Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:08:27.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - International politics and East and Southeast Asia

The Cold War and the Sino–Soviet split

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Nick Knight
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Michael Heazle
Affiliation:
Griffith Asia Institute
Get access

Summary

THE CONCEPT OF A REGION suggests that the societies incorporated within it, while undoubtedly differing in significant ways, share some fundamental characteristics that provide them a regional quality. Issues that have affected one society have likewise influenced other societies; there have been shared historical, social, and political experiences. Moreover, increasing economic integration (internal trade and investment flows, convergence of economic systems) supports the suggestion that East and Southeast Asia is a region. Regionalisation of politics, through institutions such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), is also premised on an increasing convergence of political interests between the nations of East and Southeast Asia. Finally, the case for characterising East and Southeast Asia as a region is built on its importance to Australia. From the Australian perspective, East and Southeast Asia is ‘its region’. Australia's economic, political and strategic interests are closely and increasingly linked to developments in the region, and Australia has increasingly adopted a regional foreign policy response to developments in East and Southeast Asia (see Chapters 10 and 12).

Nevertheless, the concept of ‘a region’ remains problematic, for no region can remain immune from international forces. This is particularly the case with East and Southeast Asia, which has been subject to a number of extremely powerful external influences. For example, European colonialism from the late fifteenth century, while uneven in spread and degree of control, cumulatively exerted a profound impact on the societies of East and Southeast Asia. In particular, colonialism had the effect of drawing these societies into an international trading economy increasingly dominated by the economic imperatives of industrial capitalism. There had been significant intra-regional trade in East and Southeast Asia prior to European colonialism, and some international trade. However, colonialism opened the economies of East and Southeast Asia to trade, capital movements, and technology transfer on an unprecedented scale. This brought new commodities and new forms of production, which impelled social changes that impacted on the lives and fortunes of millions of people in countless ways. Similarly, the various societies and states of the region were, through the agency of colonialism, exposed to an international political order in which the nation-state had become, by the beginning of the nineteenth century, the dominant form of political organisation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Australia's Neighbours
An Introduction to East and Southeast Asia
, pp. 120 - 136
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buhite, Russell D 1981 Soviet–American Relations in Asia, 1945–1954NormanUniversity of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
Ham, Paul 2008 Vietnam: The Australian WarSydneyHarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
Herring, George C. 1979 America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975New YorkJohn WileyGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1980 The impact of the Korean War on the Cold WarJournal of Conflict Resolution 24 563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahin, George McT 1986 Intervention: How America became involved in VietnamNew YorkAlfred A. KnopfGoogle Scholar
LaFeber, Walter 1997 America, Russia and the Cold War, 1945–1996New YorkMcGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn P 1992 A Preponderance of Power: National security, the Truman administration, and the Cold WarStanford, CAStanford University PressGoogle Scholar
McDougall, Derek 1997 Studies in International Relations: The Asia–Pacific, the nuclear age, AustraliaRydalmereHodder EducationGoogle Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne 1998 Brothers in Arms: The rise and fall of the Sino–Soviet alliance, 1945–1963Washington DC and StanfordWoodrow Wilson Center Press and Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×