Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:18:25.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Blood Loss: Does It Change My Intravenous Anesthetic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Ken Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
Talmage D. Egan
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
Charles E. Smith
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Objectives

  1. Review emerging data on the influence of blood loss and resuscitation on the behavior of commonly used intravenous sedative hypnotics and opioids.

  2. Discuss the rational selection and dosing of sedative hypnotics and opioids in settings of intravascular volume depletion.

SUMMARY

Anesthesiologists have long recognized the need to moderate doses of intravenous anesthetics in settings of significant blood loss. The scientific rationale for this practice, however, has not been well established. This chapter reviews recent investigations that have quantified how blood loss influences intravenous anesthetic behavior and synthesizes these findings into a set of clinical “take-home messages” targeted at improving patient safety.

INFLUENCE OF BLOOD LOSS ON INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETICS

Dr. Halford, a surgeon, wrote a letter to the editor of Anesthesiology after caring for several trauma victims after the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941. He noticed that anesthetists had started using the intravenous (IV) anesthetic sodium pentothal. His comments were:

Then let it be said that intravenous anesthesia is also an ideal form of euthanasia … With this heterogeneous mass of emergency anesthetists, it is necessary to choose an anesthetic involving the WIDEST MARGIN OF SAFETY for the patient … Stick with ETHER [1].

Anesthesiologists have recognized the need to incrementally dose these anesthetics, and to moderate the overall dose for patients who have significant blood loss before or during surgery. Through experience, they have learned that a full dose of certain IV anesthetics can lead to pronounced and often unwanted side effects with potentially disastrous consequences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trauma Anesthesia , pp. 133 - 141
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Halford, F.A critique of intravenous anesthesia in war surgery. Anesthesiology 1943;4: 67–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paepe, P, Belpaire, FM, Rosseel, MT, Buylaert, WA. The influence of hemorrhagic shock on the pharmacokinet and the analgesic effect of morphine in the rat. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1998;12: 624–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, TD, Kuramkote, S, Gong, G, Zhang, J, McJames, SW, Bailey, PL. Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in hemorrhagic shock: A porcine model. Anesthesiology 1999;91: 156–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, KB, Kern, SE, Hamber, EA, McJames, SW, Kohnstamm, KM, Egan, TD. Influence of hemorrhagic shock on remifentanil; a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesthesiology 2001;94: 322–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, I, Grathwohl, K, IB, T, Martini, W, Johnson, K.The influence of hemorrhagic shock on ketamine: a pharmacokinetic analysis. Anesthesiology 2006; ASA Annual Meeting Abstracts A203.Google Scholar
Paepe, P, Belpaire, FM, Rosseel, MT, Hoey, G, Boon, PA, Buylaert, WA: Influence of hypovolemia on the pharmacokinetics and the electroencephalographic effect of propofol in the rat. Anesthesiology 2000;93: 1482–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paepe, P, Belpaire, FM, Hoey, G, Boon, PA, Buylaert, WA. Influence of hypovolemia on the pharmacokinetics and the electroencephalographic effect of etomidate in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;290: 1048–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K, Egan, T, Kern, S, McJames, S, Cluff, M, Pace, N.Influence of hemorrhagic shock followed by crystalloid resuscitation on propofol: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesthesiology 2004.;101: 647–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, KB, Egan, TD, Kern, SE, White, JL, McJames, SW, Syroid, N, Whiddon, D, Church, T.The influence of hemorrhagic shock on propofol: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesthesiology 2003;99: 409–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, KB, Egan, TD, Layman, J, Kern, SE, White, JL, McJames, SW. The influence of hemorrhagic shock on etomidate: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis. Anesth Analg 2003;96: 1360–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klockowski, P, Levy, G.Kinetics of drug action in disease states. XXV. Effect of experimental hypovolemia on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of desmethyldiazepam. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1988;245: 508–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Weiskopf, RB, Bogertz, MS, Roizen, MF, Reid, IA.Cardiovascular and metabolic sequelae of inducing anesthesia with ketamine or thiopental in hypovolemic swine. Anesthesiology 1984;60: 214–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, P, Gelman, S, Reves, JG, Greenblatt, DJ, Alvis, M, Bradley, E.Midazolam pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics during acute hypovolemia. Anesthesiology 1985;63: 140–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benowitz, N, Forsyth, RP, Melmon, KL, Rowland, M.Lidocaine disposition kinetics in monkey and man II. Effect of hemorrhage and sympathomimetic drug administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1973;16: 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, S.Shock values. Anesthesiology 2004;101: 568–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlin, DJ, Arends, RH, Gunn, HC, Norman, G, Koerschgen, ME, Shen, DD. Optimal propofol-alfentanil combinations for supplementing nitrous oxide for outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology 1999;91: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazama, T, Ikeda, K, Morita, K.The pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses to skin incision, peritoneum incision, and wall retraction. Anesthesiology 1998;89: 894–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, TK, Palter, M, Grasberger, R, Vezina, R, Gerstein, L, Yeston, N, Egdahl, RH. Endorphins in primate hemorrhagic shock: Beneficial action of opiate antagonists. J Surg Res 1986;40: 265–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina, P.Opiate modulation of hemodynamic, hormonal, and cytokine response to hemorrhage. Shock 2001;15: 471–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuggle, D, Horton, J.beta-Endorphins in canine hemorrhagic shock. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986;163: 137–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Dutta, S, W, F.Formulation-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol 1998;50: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struys, MM, Vereecke, H, Moerman, A, Jensen, EW, Verhaeghen, D, Neve, N, Dumortier, FJ, Mortier, EP. Ability of the bispectral index, autoregressive modelling with exogenous input-derived auditory evoked potentials, and predicted propofol concentrations to measure patient responsiveness during anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesiology 2003;99: 802–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, M, Thiessen, D, Mutch, W.Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function is unaltered during propofol infusion in newborn swine. Anesth Analg 1998;86: 717–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodchild, C, Serrao, J.Cardiovascular effects of propofol in the anaesthetized dog. Br J Anesth 1989;63: 87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brussel, T, Theissen, JL, Vigfusson, G, Lunkenheimer, PP, Aken, H, Lawin, P.Hemodynamic and cardiodynamic effects of propofol and etomidate: Negative inotropic properties of propofol. Anesth Analg 1989;69: 35–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Pagel, PS, Warltier, DC. Negative inotropic effects of propofol as evaluated by the regional preload recruitable stroke work relationship in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesthesiology 1993;78: 100–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holford, NH, Sheiner, LB. Understanding the dose-effect relationship: Clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin Pharmacokinet 1981;6: 429–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×