Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T14:40:18.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Industrial democracy in the European Community: trade unions as a defensive transnational community, 1968–1988

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Marie-Laure Djelic
Affiliation:
ESSEC Business School, France
Sigrid Quack
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute, Cologne
Get access

Summary

In recent years social scientists and historians alike have emphasized increasingly that national political systems, economies, and societies cannot be understood in isolation from their international environment (Osterhammel 2001; Djelic and Quack 2003). The growing prominence of such concepts as transnational governance (Djelic and Sahlin-Andersson 2006) or the network society (Castells 2000) is indicative of this trend. In the field of European Union studies – the more particular context of this chapter – a similar tendency has led scholars to focus on the “informal politics” (Middlemas 1995) of the EU's multi-level governance system, which is characterized by constant communication and negotiation between supranational, national, and regional policy-makers and non-governmental groups. Studies of transnational networks ranging from the Christian Democrats (Kaiser 2007) to competition lawyers (van Waarden and Drahos 2002) have demonstrated the innovative potential of this approach. However, as emphasized by Mayntz in this volume, most contributions in these literatures concentrate on relational processes of exchange and negotiation, and pay less attention to the “community” aspect of transnational governance, that is, the bonds of shared values, knowledge or skills that underlie processes of transnational group formation.

In this chapter I explore this community aspect in relation to trade unions in the European Community between the late 1960s and late 1980s, and more specifically, their involvement in European debates about industrial democracy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Communities
Shaping Global Economic Governance
, pp. 282 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Castells, M. 2000. The rise of the network society, Second edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coates, K. 1968. Can the workers run industry?London: Sphere.Google Scholar
Cole, G. D. H. 1923. Workshop organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dartmann, C. 1996. Re-distribution of power, joint consultation or productivity coalitions? Labour and postwar reconstruction in Germany and Britain, 1945–1953. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Deutsch, S. 2005. “A researcher's guide to worker participation, labor and economic and industrial democracy,” Economic and Industrial Democracy 26 (4): 645–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L., and Quack, S. 2003. Globalization and institutions: Redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L., and Sahlin-Andersson, K. 2006. Transnational governance. Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Réau, E. 2000. “La Conférence des recteurs des Universitées européennes : une expérience pionnière de coopération universitaire,” in Bachoud, A. (ed.), Les Intellectuels et l'Europe de 1945 à nos jours. Paris: Publications Universitaires Denis Diderot, pp. 243–54.Google Scholar
Fetzer, T. 2005. “Europäische Strategien deutscher Gewerkschaften in historischer Perspektive,” in Knodt, M. and Finke, B. (eds.), pp. 299–318.
Fetzer, T. 2008. “European Works Councils as risk communities: The case of General Motors,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 14 (3): 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. 1985. History and heritage: The social origins of the British industrial relations systems. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gobin, C. 1996. Consultation et concertation sociales à l'échelle de la Communauté économique européenne. Etude des positions et stratégies de la Confédération européenne des syndicats (1958–1991). Dissertation, Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Gold, M. and Schwimbersky, S. 2008. “The European Company Statute: Implications for industrial relations in the European Union,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 14 (1): 46–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höland, A. 2000. Mitbestimmung in Europa: Rechtliche und politische Regelungen. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.Google Scholar
Hyman, R. 2001. Understanding European trade unionism: Between class, market and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kaiser, W. 2007. Christian democracy and the origins of European union. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, H., Whittall, M. and Huijgen, F. 2007. “European works councils and the problem of identity,” in Whittall, M., Knudsen, H. and Huijgen, F. (eds.), Towards a European labour identity. The case of the European works council. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecher, W.et al. 1999, The establishment of European Works Councils: From information committee to social actor. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lyon-Caen, G. 1970. Contribution a l'étude des modes de représentation des intérets des travailleurs dans le cadre des sociétés anonymes européennes. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
MacLean, D. A. 1927. “Christian industrial democracy: Its moral basis,” International Journal of Ethics 37 (4): 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlemas, K. 1995. Orchestrating Europe: The informal politics of the European Union, 1973–95. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Nehring, H. 2005. “National internationalists: British and West German protests against nuclear weapons: The politics of transnational communication and the social history of the Cold War, 1957–1964,” Contemporary European History, 14: 559–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammel, J. 2001. “Transnationale Gesellschaftsgeschichte: Erweiterung oder Alternative?,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 27: 464–79.Google Scholar
Pasture, P. 2005. “Trade unions as a transnational movement in the European space 1955–65,” in Kaiser, W. and Starie, P. (eds.), Transnational European Union: Towards a common political space. London: Routledge, pp. 109–30.Google Scholar
Piehl, E. 1973. Multinationale Konzerne und internationale Gewerkschaftsbewegung. Ein Beitrag zur Analyse und zur Strategie der Arbeiterbewegung im international organisierten Kapitalismus insbesondere in Westeuropa. Frankfurt a.M.: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Sanders, P. 1967. Projet d'un statut des sociétés anonymes européennes. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Schneider, M. 2000. Kleine Geschichte der Gewerkschaften: Ihre Entwicklung in Deutschland von den Anfängen bis heute, Second edition. Bonn: Dietz.Google Scholar
Schuller, T. 1985. Democracy at work. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smets, I. 1998. “Les régions se mobilisent–quel lobby regional à Bruxelles?,” in Claeys, P. (ed.), Lobbyisme, pluralisme et intégration europèenne. Brussels: Presses Interuniversitaires Européennes, pp. 303–27.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 1981. Gewerkschaftliche Organisationsprobleme in der sozialstaatlichen Demokratie. Königstein/Taunus.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 1997. “Neither European nor works councils: A reply to Paul Knutsen,” Economic and Industrial Democracy 18 (2): 325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. 1998. “Gewerkschaften zwischen Nationalstaat und Europäischer Union,” WSI-Mitteilungen 51 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. and Szczerbiak, A. (eds.) 2008. Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford University Press.
Teuteberg, H.-J. 1981. “Ursprünge und Entwicklung der Mitbestimmung in Deutschland,” in Mitbestimmung. Ursprünge und Entwicklung. Referate und Diskussionsbeiträge der 5. öffentlichen Vortragsveranstaltung der Gesellschaft für Unternehmengeschichte e.V. am 7. Mai 1980. Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp. 7–73.Google Scholar
Linden, M. (ed.) 2000. The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. Bern: Peter Lang.
Waarden, F. and Drahos, M. 2002. “Courts and (epistemic) communities in the convergence of competition policies,” Journal of European Public Policy 9 (6): 913–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, W. P. 1970. The International Co-operative Alliance. London: International Co-operative Alliance.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×