Cheshire, T. Coronavirus: How South Korea’s track and trace system has kept death count below 500 [Internet]. Sky News. 2020. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-how-south-koreas-track-and-trace-system-has-kept-death-count-below–500–12103124Google Scholar

Thapa, SB, Kakar, TS, Mayer, C and Khanal, D. Clinical outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med [Internet]. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):279–281. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2771090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vlasschaert, C, Topf, JM and Hiremath, S. Proliferation of papers and preprints during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Progress or problems with peer review?Adv Chronic Kidney Dis [Internet]. 2020 Sep;27(5):418–26. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1548559520301191Google ScholarPubMed

Pai, M. Covidization of research: What are the risks? Nat Med [Internet]. 2020 Aug 27;26(8):1159. www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1015–0Google Scholar

National Bureau of Economic Research. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity [Internet]. Princeton University Press; 1962. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400879762/htmlGoogle Scholar

Mouzakitis, A. Modernity and the idea of progress. Front Sociol [Internet]. 2017 Mar 20;2:3. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2017.00003/fullGoogle Scholar

Niiniluoto, I. Scientific Progress [Internet]. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2019. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-progress/Google Scholar

Dasgupta, S. The dilemma of “progress” in science [Internet]. OUPblog. 2018. https://blog.oup.com/2018/08/the-dilemma-of-progress-in-science/Google Scholar

Owen, R, Macnaghten, P and Stilgoe, J. Responsible research and innovation:From science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy [Internet]. 2012 Dec 1;39(6):751–60. https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/scipol/scs093Google Scholar

Clauset, A, Larremore, DB and Sinatra, R. Data-driven predictions in the science of science. Science [Internet]. 2017 Feb 3;355(6324):477–80. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aal4217Google Scholar

Pielke, R. In retrospect: Science – the endless frontier. Nature [Internet]. 2010 Aug 18;466(7309):922–3. www.nature.com/articles/466922aGoogle Scholar

Bush, V. Science – The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1945.Google Scholar

Maboloc, CR. On the scientific methods of Kuhn and Popper: Implications of paradigm-shifts to development models. Philosophia (Mendoza) [Internet]. 2018 Jun 2;46(2):387–99. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11406-017-9891–3Google Scholar

Naughton, J. Thomas Kuhn: The man who changed the way the world looked at science. Guardian. 2012 Aug 19. www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/19/thomas-kuhn-structure-scientific-revolutionsGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Bird, A. Thomas Kuhn. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2018. plato.stanford.edu/entries/thomas-kuhnGoogle Scholar

Fortunato, S, Bergstrom, CT, Börner, K, et al. Science of science. Science [Internet]. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aao0185Google Scholar

US Investments in Medical and Health Research and Development 2013–2018 [Internet]. Research!America. 2019. www.researchamerica.org/sites/default/files/Publications/InvestmentReport2019_Fnl.pdfGoogle Scholar

Buranova, DD. The value of Avicenna’s heritage in development of modern integrative medicine in Uzbekistan. Integr Med Res [Internet]. 2015 Dec;4(4):220–4. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213422015005296Google Scholar

Colgan, R. Advice to the Young Physician [Internet]. Boston, MA; 2010. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978–1–4419–1034–9Google Scholar

Garfield, E. Citation, Indexes for Science. Science [Internet]. 1955 Jul 15;122(3159):108–11. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.122.3159.108Google Scholar

Wouters, P. Eugene Garfield (1925–2017). Nature [Internet]. 2017 Mar 23;543(7646):492. www.nature.com/articles/543492aGoogle Scholar

Garfield, E. The evolution of the Science Citation Index. Int Microbiol. 2007. 10:65–69. doi:10.2436/20.1501.01.10Google Scholar

Wallner, C. Ban impact factor manipulation. Science [Internet]. 2009 Jan 23;323(5913):461. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.323.5913.461aGoogle Scholar

Juyal, D, Thawani, V, Sayana, A and Pal, S. Impact factor: Mutation, manipulation, and distortion. J Fam Med Prim Care [Internet]. 2019;8(11):3475–3479. https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_515_19Google Scholar

Pan, RK and Fortunato, S. Author impact factor: Tracking the dynamics of individual scientific impact. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2015 May 12;4(1):4880. www.nature.com/articles/srep04880Google Scholar

Spicer, A. Explainer: what is an H-index and how is it calculated? The Conversation. 2015. theconversation.com/explainer-what-is-an-h-index-and-how-is-it-calculated-41162Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, J and Packalen, M. Stagnation and Scientific Incentives [Internet]. NBER:Cambridge, MA; 2020 Feb. www.nber.org/papers/w26752.pdfGoogle Scholar

Foster, JG, Rzhetsky, A and Evans, JA. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. Am Sociol Rev [Internet]. 2015 Oct 1;80(5):875–908. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122415601618Google Scholar

Biagioli, M. Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature [Internet]. 2016 Jul 12;535(7611):201. www.nature.com/articles/535201aGoogle Scholar

Mallapaty, S. China bans cash rewards for publishing papers. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Mar 5;579(7797):18. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00574–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baccini, A, De Nicolao, G and Petrovich, E. Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. Bornmann, L, ed. PLoS One [Internet]. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0221212. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221212Google Scholar

Tiokhin, L, Yan, M and Morgan, TJH. Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nat Hum Behav [Internet]. 2021 Jul 28;5(7):857–67. www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-01040–1Google Scholar

Kuruvilla, S, Mays, N, Pleasant, A and Walt, G. Describing the impact of health research: A Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2006 Dec 1;6(1):134. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472–6963–6–134Google Scholar

Marder, E. Scientific Publishing: Beyond scoops to best practices. Elife [Internet]. 2017 Jul 11;6. https://elifesciences.org/articles/30076Google Scholar

Mejlgaard, N, Bouter, LM, Gaskell, G, et al. Research integrity: Nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Oct 15;586(7829):358–60. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02847–8Google Scholar

Head, ML, Holman, L, Lanfear, R, et al. The extent and consequences of P-hacking in science. PLOS Biol [Internet]. 2015 Mar 13;13(3):e1002106. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hawkes, N. Sixty seconds on … P-hacking. BMJ [Internet]. 2018 Sep 26;k4039. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.k4039Google Scholar

Fisher, RA. Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd; 1956.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, JPA. What have we (not) learnt from millions of scientific papers with P values? Am Stat [Internet]. 2019 Mar 29;73(sup1):20–5. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2018.1447512Google Scholar

Brender, J. Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics [Internet]. Elsevier; 2006. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780123704641X5000XGoogle Scholar

Adda, J, Decker, C and Ottaviani, M. P-hacking in clinical trials and how incentives shape the distribution of results across phases. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2020 Jun 16;117(24):13386–92. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1919906117Google Scholar

The Anturane Reinfarction Trial: Reevaluation of outcome. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1982 Apr 22;306(16):1005–8. www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM198204223061640Google Scholar

McCloskey, A and Michaillat, P. Critical values robust to P-hacking. arXiv. 2022;doi:10.48550/arXiv.2005.04141Google Scholar

Nobel Prize facts. NobelPrize.org. 2021.Google Scholar

Petersen, AM, Fortunato, S, Pan, RK, et al. Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15316–21. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1323111111Google Scholar

Petersen, AM, Jung, W-S, Yang, J-S, et al. Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2011 Jan 4;108(1):18–23. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1016733108Google Scholar

Perc, M. The Matthew effect in empirical data. J R Soc Interface [Internet]. 2014 Sep 6;11(98):20140378. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378Google Scholar

Ma, Y and Uzzi, B. Scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2018 Dec 11;115(50):12608–15. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1800485115Google Scholar

Mazloumian, A, Eom, Y-H, Helbing, D, et al. How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and Nobel Prizes. Moreno, Y, ed. PLoS One [Internet]. 2011 May 4;6(5):e18975. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018975Google Scholar

Fortunato, S, Bergstrom, CT, Börner, K, et al. Science of science. Science [Internet]. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aao0185Google Scholar

Li, J, Yin, Y, Fortunato, S, et al. Scientific elite revisited: Patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact. J R Soc Interface [Internet]. 2020 Apr 22;17(165):20200135. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2020.0135Google Scholar

Jin, C, Ma, Y and Uzzi, B. Scientific prizes and the extraordinary growth of scientific topics. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2021 Dec 5;12(1):5619. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25712–2Google Scholar

Clancy, M. Building a New Research Field. New Things Under the Sun. 2022.Google Scholar

Howes, A. Why innovation prizes fail. Works in progress. 2022.Google Scholar

Krauss, L. Do the new, big-money science prizes work? [Internet]. The New Yorker. 2016. www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/do-the-new-big-money-science-prizes-workGoogle Scholar

Henrich, J, Heine, SJ and Norenzayan, A. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature [Internet]. 2010 Jul 30;466(7302):29–29. www.nature.com/articles/466029aGoogle Scholar

Arnett, JJ. The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. Am Psychol [Internet]. 2008;63(7):602–14. http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602Google Scholar

Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Policymaking Insights from Behavioral Economics. Foote, CL, Goette, L, Meier, S, eds. Boston, MA; 2009.Google Scholar

Lernmark, Å. The streetlight effect – Is there light at the end of the tunnel?: Figure 1. Diabetes [Internet]. 2015 Apr 24;64(4):1105–7. http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.2337/db15–0011Google Scholar

Bewley, MA, Budd, RC, Ryan, E, et al. Opsonic phagocytosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is enhanced by Nrf2 agonists. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2018 Sep 15;198(6):739–50. www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/rccm.201705-0903OCGoogle Scholar

Sidhaye, VK and Biswal, S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Abandoning the “streetlight effect.” Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2018 Sep 15;198(6):697–8. www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/rccm.201803-0531EDGoogle Scholar

Khamsi, R. Scientists may be using the wrong cells to study Covid-19. WIRED. 2020.Google Scholar

Waldinger, F. Bombs, brains, and science: The role of human and physical capital for the creation of scientific knowledge. Rev Econ Stat [Internet]. 2016 Dec;98(5):811–31. https://direct.mit.edu/rest/article/98/5/811-831/58619Google Scholar

Baruffaldi, S and Gaessler, F. The returns to physical capital in knowledge production: Evidence from lab disasters. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2021; www.ssrn.com/abstract=3912401Google Scholar

Mgbeoji, I. The juridical origins of the international patent system: Towards a historiography of the role of patents in industrialization. J Hist Int Law/Rev d’histoire du droit Int [Internet]. 2003;5(2):403–22. https://brill.com/view/journals/jhil/5/2/article-p403_7.xmlGoogle Scholar

Moser, P. How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world’s fairs. Am Econ Rev [Internet]. 2005 Aug 1;95(4):1214–36. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/0002828054825501Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Ding, W and Stuart, T. The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J Ind Econ [Internet]. 2009 Dec;57(4):637–76. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00395.xGoogle Scholar

Bentwich, M. Changing the rules of the game: Addressing the conflict between free access to scientific discovery and intellectual property rights. Nat Biotechnol [Internet]. 2010 Feb;28(2):137–40. www.nature.com/articles/nbt0210–137Google Scholar

Heller, MA and Eisenberg, RS. Can patents deter innovation? The Anticommons in biomedical research. Science (80-) [Internet]. 1998 May;280(5364):698–701. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.280.5364.698Google Scholar

Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges [Internet]. OECD; 2004. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/patents-and-innovation_9789264026728-enGoogle Scholar

Mazzucato, M and Li, HL. A market shaping approach for the biopharmaceutical industry: Governing innovation towards the public interest. J Law, Med Ethics [Internet]. 2021 Apr 21;49(1):39–49. www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1073110521000085/type/journal_articleGoogle Scholar

Williams, H. Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2010 Jul. www.nber.org/papers/w16213.pdfGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murray, F, Aghion, P, Dewatripont, M, et al. Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2009 Mar. www.nber.org/papers/w14819.pdfGoogle Scholar

History.com Editors. MDMA. History 2017.www.history.com/topics/crime/history-of-mdmaGoogle Scholar

Andreae, MH, Rhodes, E, Bourgoise, T, et al. An ethical exploration of barriers to research on controlled drugs. Am J Bioeth [Internet]. 2016 Apr 2;16(4):36–47. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15265161.2016.1145282Google Scholar

Nutt, DJ, King, LA and Nichols, DE. New victims of current drug laws. Nat Rev Neurosci [Internet]. 2013 Dec 23;14(12):877 www.nature.com/articles/nrn3530–c2Google Scholar

Mitchell, JM, Bogenschutz, M, Lilienstein, A, et al. MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Nat Med [Internet]. 2021 Jun 10;27(6):1025–33. www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01336–3Google Scholar

End the ban on psychoactive drug research [Internet]. Scientific American. 2014. www.scientificamerican.com/article/end-the-ban-on-psychoactive-drug-research/Google Scholar

Joint evaluation of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 o [Internet]. Brussels; 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/files/paediatrics/docs/orphan-regulation_eval_swd_2020-163_part-1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Sakushima, K, Takeda, H and Aoi, Y. Orphan drug designation and development in Japan: 25 years of experience and assessment. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet]. 2021 Dec 15;20(12):893–4. www.nature.com/articles/d41573-021-00045–3Google Scholar

Marselis, D and Hordijk, L. From blockbuster to “nichebuster”: How a flawed legislation helped create a new profit model for the drug industry. BMJ [Internet]. 2020 Jul 28;m2983. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.m2983Google Scholar

Scannell, JW, Blanckley, A, Boldon, H, et al. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet]. 2012 Mar 1;11(3):191–200. www.nature.com/articles/nrd3681Google Scholar

Wuchty, S, Jones, BF and Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2007 May 18;316(5827):1036–9. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1136099Google Scholar

Fortunato, S, Bergstrom, CT, Börner, K, et al. Science of science. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2018 Mar 2;359(6379). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aao0185Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Zivin, JSG and Wang, J. Superstar extinction. Q J Econ [Internet]. 2010 May;125(2):549–89. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-lookup/doi/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.549Google Scholar

Wu, L, Wang, D and Evans, JA. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature [Internet]. 2019 Feb 13;566(7744):378–82. www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-0941–9Google Scholar

Azoulay, P. Small research teams “disrupt” science more radically than large ones. Nature [Internet]. 2019 Feb 13;566(7744):330–2. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00350–3Google Scholar

Girotra, K, Terwiesch, C and Ulrich, KT. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Manage Sci [Internet]. 2010 Apr;56(4):591–605. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144Google Scholar

Xu, F, Wu, L and Evans, J. Flat teams drive scientific innovation. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2022 Jun 7;119(23). https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2200927119Google Scholar

Thomas, EG, Jayabalasingham, B, Collins, T, et al. Gender disparities in invited comm-entary authorship in 2459 medical journals. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2019 Oct 23;2(10):e1913682. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2753395Google Scholar

Morgan, AC, Way, SF, Hoefer, MJD, et al. The unequal impact of parenthood in academia. Sci Adv [Internet]. 2021 Feb 24;7(9). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd1996Google Scholar

Witteman, HO, Hendricks, M, Straus, S, et al. Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. Lancet [Internet]. 2019 Feb;393(10171):531–40. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673618326114Google Scholar

Sugimoto, CR, Ahn, Y-Y, Smith, E, et al. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: A cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis. Lancet [Internet]. 2019 Feb;393(10171):550–9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673618329957Google Scholar

Koning, R, Samila, S and Ferguson, J-P. Female inventors and inventions. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2019; www.ssrn.com/abstract=3401889Google Scholar

Yang, Y, Tian, TY, Woodruff, TK, et al. Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2022 Sep 6;119(36). https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2200841119Google Scholar

Cheng, W and Weinberg, B. Marginalized and Overlooked? Minoritized Groups and the Adoption of New Scientific Ideas [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2021 Aug. www.nber.org/papers/w29179.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. Science in a Democratic Society. Prometheus Books; 2011.Google Scholar

Bhakuni, H and Abimbola, S. Epistemic injustice in academic global health. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1465–70. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214109X21003016Google Scholar

Harris, M, Marti, J, Watt, H, et al. Explicit bias toward high-income-country research: A randomized, blinded, crossover experiment of English clinicians. Health Aff [Internet]. 2017 Nov;36(11):1997–2004. www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0773Google Scholar

Wahls, WP. Biases in grant proposal success rates, funding rates and award sizes affect the geographical distribution of funding for biomedical research. PeerJ [Internet]. 2016 Apr 11;4:e1917. https://peerj.com/articles/1917Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Graff Zivin, JS and Sampat, BN. The Diffusion of Scientific Knowledge across Time and Space. In: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited [Internet]. University of Chicago Press; 107–55. http://chicago.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7208/chicago/9780226473062.001.0001/upso-9780226473031-chapter–6Google Scholar

Gruber, J, Johnson, S and Moretti, E. Place-based productivity and costs in science. NBER. 2022. Report No.: 30416.Google Scholar

Banal-Estañol, A, Macho-Stadler, I and Pérez-Castrillo, D. Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against? Res Policy [Internet]. 2019 Sep;48(7):1823–40. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S004873331930099XGoogle Scholar

Myers, K. The Direction of Biomedical Science. 2016. (Value of Medical Research).www.nber.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/WhitePaper-Myers11.28.2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Romer, P. Should the Government Subsidize Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers? [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2000 Jun. www.nber.org/papers/w7723.pdfGoogle Scholar

Arrow, KJ and Capron, WM. Dynamic shortages and price rises: The engineer-scientist case. Q J Econ [Internet]. 1959 May;73(2):292. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-lookup/doi/10.2307/1883726Google Scholar

Goolsbee, A. Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers? [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 1998 Apr. www.nber.org/papers/w6532.pdfGoogle Scholar

Jones, BF. The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev Econ Stud [Internet]. 2009 Jan;76(1):283–317. https://academic.oup.com/restud/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00531.xGoogle Scholar

Alberts, B, Kirschner, MW, Tilghman, S, et al. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5773–7. https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1404402111Google Scholar

Freeman, R and Van Reenen, J. What if congress doubled R&D spending on the physical sciences? Innov Policy Econ [Internet]. 2009 Jan;9:1–38. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/592419Google Scholar

Mason, JL, Johnston, E, Berndt, S, et al. Labor and skills gap analysis of the biomedical research workforce. FASEB J [Internet]. 2016 Aug 13;30(8):2673–83. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1096/fj.201500067 RGoogle Scholar

Simoneschi, D. We need to improve the welfare of life science trainees. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jan 5;118(1). https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2024143118Google Scholar

Gewin, V. Has the “great resignation” hit academia? Nature [Internet]. 2022 Jun 2;606(7912):211–3. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01512–6Google Scholar

Langin, K. As professors struggle to recruit postdocs, calls for structural change in academia intensify. Science. 2022; Vol 376, Issue 6600.Google Scholar

Cyranoski, D, Gilbert, N, Ledford, H, et al. Education: The PhD factory. Nature [Internet]. 2011 Apr 20;472(7343):276–9. www.nature.com/articles/472276aGoogle Scholar

Lambert, WM, Wells, MT, Cipriano, MF, et al. Career choices of underrepresented and female postdocs in the biomedical sciences. Elife [Internet]. 2020 Jan 3;9. https://elifesciences.org/articles/48774Google Scholar

Gibbs, KD, McGready, J, Bennett, JC, et al. Biomedical science Ph.D. Career interest patterns by race/ethnicity and gender. Launois, P, ed. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 Dec 10;9(12):e114736. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114736Google Scholar

Budget [Internet]. National Institutes of Health. 2020. www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/budgetGoogle Scholar

Wang, Y, Jones, BF and Wang, D. Early-career setback and future career impact. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1;10(1):4331. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12189–3Google Scholar

Ray, D. “Red and expert” and China’s Cultural Revolution. Pac Aff [Internet]. 1970;43(1):22. www.jstor.org/stable/2753832?origin=crossrefGoogle Scholar

Kshetri, N. Forces shaping the development of the Chinese technology workforce. In: The Rapidly Transforming Chinese High-Technology Industry and Market [Internet]. Elsevier; 2008. 89–106. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9781843344643500064Google Scholar

Freeman, R and Huang, W. China’s “Great Leap Forward” in Science and Engineering [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2015 Apr. www.nber.org/papers/w21081.pdfGoogle Scholar

Tollefson, J. China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles. Nature [Internet]. 2018 Jan 18;553(7689):390. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927–4Google Scholar

Xie, Y, Zhang, C and Lai, Q. China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2014 Jul 1;111(26):9437–42. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1407709111Google Scholar

Shi, Y and Rao, Y. China’s research culture. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2010 Sep 3;329(5996):1128. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1196916Google Scholar

Xin, H. Defying Critics, China’s Science Ministry defends research culture. Science. 2010.Google Scholar

Ministry of Science and Technology. Ministry of Science and Technology responds to Shi Yigong and Rao Yi’s “Science” editorial [Internet]. Science Network. 2010. https://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2010/11/239907.shtmGoogle Scholar

Kaiser, J. NIH uncovers racial disparity in grant awards. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):925–6. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.333.6045.925Google Scholar

Cole, S, Cole, JR and Simon, GA. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science (80-) [Internet]. 1981 Nov 20;214(4523):881–6. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.7302566Google Scholar

Bromham, L, Dinnage, R and Hua, X. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature [Internet]. 2016 Jun 30;534(7609):684–7. www.nature.com/articles/nature18315Google Scholar

Boudreau, KJ, Guinan, EC, Lakhani, KR, et al. Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Manage Sci [Internet]. 2016 Sep;62(10):2765–83. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285Google Scholar

Lane, JN, Teplitskiy, M, Gray, G, et al. Conservatism gets funded? A field experiment on the role of negative information in novel project evaluation. Manage Sci [Internet]. 2021 Oct 28; http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4107Google Scholar

Day, TE. The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review. Res Policy [Internet]. 2015 Jul;44(6):1266–70. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733315000086Google Scholar

Callier, V. A little bias in peer review scores can translate into big money, simulation finds [Internet]. Science Magazine. 2015. www.science.org/content/article/little-bias-peer-review-scores-can-translate-big-money-simulation-findsGoogle Scholar

Allison, PD, Long, JS and Krauze, TK. Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. Am Sociol Rev [Internet]. 1982 Oct;47(5):615. www.jstor.org/stable/2095162?origin=crossrefGoogle Scholar

Bol, T, de Vaan, M and van de Rijt, A. The Matthew effect in science funding. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2018 May 8;115(19):4887–90. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1719557115Google Scholar

Madsen, EB and Aagaard, K. Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers. Quant Sci Stud [Internet]. 2020 Aug;1(3):1159–81. https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/1/3/1159-1181/96125Google Scholar

Nimgaonkar, A, Mughal, AY, Heimer, H, et al. Exploring static and dynamic relationships between burden of disease and research funding in the United States. Heal Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2022 Dec 3;20(1):60. https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-022-00837–yGoogle Scholar

Aagaard, K, Kladakis, A and Nielsen, MW. Concentration or dispersal of research funding? Quant Sci Stud [Internet]. 2019 Aug 29;1–33. https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/1/1/117-149/15557Google Scholar

Chu, JSG and Evans, JA. Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2021 Oct 12;118(41):e2021636118. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.2021636118Google Scholar

Katz, Y and Matter, U. Metrics of inequality: The concentration of resources in the US biomedical elite. Sci Cult (Lond) [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1;29(4):475–502. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09505431.2019.1694882Google Scholar

Hu, AGZ. Public funding and the ascent of Chinese science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Res Policy [Internet]. 2020 Jun;49(5):103983. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733320300639Google Scholar

Mongeon, P, Brodeur, C, Beaudry, C, et al. Concentration of research funding leads to decreasing marginal returns. Res Eval [Internet]. 2016 Mar 25;rvw007. https://academic.oup.com/rev/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/reseval/rvw007Google Scholar

Thompson, D. Silicon Valley’s New Obsession [Internet]. The Atlantic. 2022. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/01/scientific-funding-is-broken-can-silicon-valley-fix-it/621295/Google Scholar

Fang, FC and Casadevall, A. Research funding: The case for a modified lottery. MBio [Internet]. 2016 May 4;7(2). https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00422–16Google Scholar

Liu, M, Choy, V, Clarke, P, et al. The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants. Res Integr Peer Rev [Internet]. 2020 Dec 3;5(1):3. https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-019-0089–zGoogle Scholar

Edgerton, D. Lessons from the Past – Why Our Current Understanding of UK Research Policy Is Wrong. LSE BLogs. 2019.Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Graff Zivin, JS, Li, D, et al. Public R&D investments and private-sector patenting: Evidence from NIH funding rules. Rev Econ Stud [Internet]. 2019 Jan 1;86(1):117–52. https://academic.oup.com/restud/article/86/1/117/5038510Google Scholar

Azoulay, P and Li, D. Scientific Grant Funding [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2020 Mar. www.nber.org/papers/w26889.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mazzucato, M. Rethinking value in health innovation: From mystifications towards prescriptions. 2017. Report No.: IIPP WP 2017–04.Google Scholar

Sampat, BN and Lichtenberg, FR. What are the respective roles of the public and private sectors in pharmaceutical innovation?Health Aff [Internet]. 2011 Feb;30(2):332–9. www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0917Google Scholar

Galkina Cleary, E, Beierlein, JM, Khanuja, NS, et al. Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2018 Mar 6;115(10):2329–34. https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1715368115Google Scholar

Myers, K. The Direction of Biomedical Science. 2016. (Value of Medical Research).Google Scholar

Sussex, J, Feng, Y, Mestre-Ferrandiz, J, et al. Quantifying the economic impact of government and charity funding of medical research on private research and development funding in the United Kingdom. BMC Med [Internet]. 2016 Dec 24;14(1):32. www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/14/32Google Scholar

Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE). Value of Research [Internet]. Brussels; 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/60_-_rise-value_of_research-june15_1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Science funding: Championing research in tough times. Nat Cell Biol [Internet]. 2012 May 2;14(5):439–439. www.nature.com/articles/ncb2499Google Scholar

Eisenstein, M. Assessment: Academic return. Nature [Internet]. 2016 May 5;533(7601):S20–1. www.nature.com/articles/533S20aGoogle Scholar

Caulfield, T and Ogbogu, U. The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]. 2015 Dec 14;16(1):70. http://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-015-0064–2Google Scholar

Blumenthal, D, Campbell, EG, Causino, N, et al. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1996 Dec 5;335(23):1734–9. www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM199612053352305Google Scholar

So, AD, Sampat, BN, Rai, AK, et al. Is Bayh-Dole good for developing countries? Lessons from the US experience. PLoS Biol [Internet]. 2008 Oct 28;6(10):e262. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060262Google Scholar

Mazzucato, M and Li, HL. The Entrepreneurial State and public options: Socialising risks and rewards [Internet]. 2020. (IIPP WP 2020–20). www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2020–20Google Scholar

Murray, F. Evaluating the Role of Science Philanthropy in American Research Universities [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2012 Jun. www.nber.org/papers/w18146.pdfGoogle Scholar

Feldman, M, Kongsted, H and Tartari, V. The Demand for Science Funding. In: DRUID19. Copenhagen; 2019.Google Scholar

Shekhtman, LM, Gates, AJ and Barabási, A-L. Mapping philanthropic support of science. 2022 Jun 9; https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10661Google Scholar

Kundu, O and Matthews, NE. The role of charitable funding in university research. Sci Public Policy [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1;46(4):611–9. https://academic.oup.com/spp/article/46/4/611/5418575Google Scholar

Michael, J. Fox Takes the Stage as the Foundation’s Annual #FoxGala Celebrates $1.5 Billion in Research Funded [Internet]. The Michael J. Fox Foundation. 2021. www.michaeljfox.org/news/michael-j-fox-takes-stage-foundations-annual-foxgala-celebrates-15-billion-research-fundedGoogle Scholar

Merton, RK. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Storer, N, ed. University of Chicago Press; 1973.Google Scholar

Eisenstadter, I. Foundations could allocate money more productively. Nature [Internet]. 2010 Mar 3;464(7285):31–31. www.nature.com/articles/464031cGoogle Scholar

Madsen, EB and Aagaard, K. Concentration of Danish research funding on individual researchers and research topics: Patterns and potential drivers. Quant Sci Stud [Internet]. 2020 Aug;1(3):1159–81. https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/1/3/1159-1181/96125Google Scholar

Bourne, HR. Opinion: Expansion fever and soft money plague the biomedical research enterprise. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2018 Aug 28;115(35):8647–51. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1813115115Google Scholar

Korn, D, Rich, RR, Garrison, HH, et al. The NIH budget in the “postdoubling” era. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2002 May 24;296(5572):1401–2. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1072486Google Scholar

Ottaviani, M. Grantmaking [Internet]. Milano; 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3723581Google Scholar

Levitt, M and Levitt, JM. Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2017 Jun 20;114(25):6498–503. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1609996114Google Scholar

Nosengo, N. Can you teach old drugs new tricks? Nature [Internet]. 2016 Jun 14;534(7607):314–6. www.nature.com/articles/534314aGoogle Scholar

Angell, M. Big Pharma, Bad Medicine. Boston Review. 2009.Google Scholar

Loise, V and Stevens, AJ. The Bayh-Dole Act turns 30. Sci Transl Med [Internet]. 2010 Oct 6;2(52). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001481Google Scholar

Ku, MS. Recent trends in specialty pharma business model. J Food Drug Anal [Internet]. 2015 Dec;23(4):595–608. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1021949815000575Google Scholar

Arora, A, Belenzon, S, Patacconi, A, et al. The changing structure of American innovation: Some cautionary remarks for economic growth. Innov Policy Econ [Internet]. 2020 Dec;20:39–93. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/705638Google Scholar

Naci, H, Carter, AW, Mossialos, E. Why the drug development pipeline is not delivering better medicines. BMJ [Internet]. 2015 Oct 23;h5542. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.h5542Google Scholar

Krieger, J, Li, D and Papanikolaou, D. Missing Novelty in Drug Development [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2018 May. www.nber.org/papers/w24595.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bryan, KA, Lemus, J and Marshall, G. R&D competition and the direction of innovation. Int J Ind Organ [Internet]. 2022 May;82:102841. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167718722000170Google Scholar

Wellcome Trust. Why is it so hard to develop new antibiotics? [Internet]. 2020. https://wellcome.org/news/why-is-it-so-hard-develop-new-antibioticsGoogle Scholar

Dall, C. Achaogen bankruptcy raises worry over antibiotic pipeline. CIDRAP News. 2019.Google Scholar

Dall, C. Antibiotic developer Melinta files for bankruptcy [Internet]. CIDRAP News. 2019. www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2019/12/antibiotic-developer-melinta-files-bankruptcyGoogle Scholar

Rotman, D. We’re not prepared for the end of Moore’s Law. MIT Technology Review. 2020.Google Scholar

Rea, PA, Pauly, MV and Burns, LR. Managing Discovery in the Life Sciences [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2018. www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781316459263/type/bookGoogle Scholar

Scannell, JW, Blanckley, A, Boldon, H, et al. Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet]. 2012 Mar 1;11(3):191–200. http://www.nature.com/articles/nrd3681Google Scholar

Ringel, MS, Scannell, JW, Baedeker, M, et al. Breaking Eroom’s Law. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet]. 2020 Dec 16;19(12):833–4. www.nature.com/articles/d41573-020-00059–3Google Scholar

Wu, Q, Liu, J, Wang, X, et al. Organ-on-a-chip: Recent breakthroughs and future prospects. Biomed Eng Online [Internet]. 2020 Dec 12;19(1):9. https://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12938-020-0752–0Google Scholar

Morgan, P, Brown, DG, Lennard, S, et al. Impact of a five-dimensional framework on R&D productivity at AstraZeneca. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet]. 2018 Mar 19;17(3):167–81. www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.244Google Scholar

Nguyen, PA, Born, DA, Deaton, AM, et al. Phenotypes associated with genes encoding drug targets are predictive of clinical trial side effects. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2019 Dec 5;10(1):1579. www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09407–3Google Scholar

King, EA, Davis, JW and Degner, JF. Are drug targets with genetic support twice as likely to be approved? Revised estimates of the impact of genetic support for drug mechanisms on the probability of drug approval. Marchini, J, ed. PLOS Genet [Internet]. 2019 Dec 12;15(12):e1008489. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008489Google Scholar

Dewey, FE, Gusarova, V, Dunbar, RL, et al. Genetic and Pharmacologic Inactivation of ANGPTL3 and Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017 Jul 20;377(3):211–21. www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1612790Google Scholar

Agarwal, R and Gaule, P. What drives innovation? Lessons from COVID-19 R&D. J Health Econ [Internet]. 2022 Mar;82:102591. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016762962200011XGoogle Scholar

Lo, AW. Can financial economics cure cancer? Atl Econ J [Internet]. 2021 Mar 1;49(1):3–21. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11293-021-09704–7Google Scholar

Pushpakom, S, Iorio, F, Eyers, PA et al. Drug repurposing: Progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov [Internet]. 2019 Jan 12;18(1):41–58. www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2018.168Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Li, D. Scientific Grant Funding [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2020 Mar. www.nber.org/papers/w26889.pdfGoogle Scholar

UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. The people’s prescription: Re-imagining health innovation to deliver public value [Internet]. 2018. www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/sites/public-purpose/files/peoples_prescription_report_final_online.pdfGoogle Scholar

Yoshinori Ohsumi Nobel Lecture [Internet]. The Nobel Prize; 2016. www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2016/ohsumi/lecture/Google Scholar

Aitkenhead, D. Peter Higgs: I wouldn’t be productive enough for today’s academic system. The Guardian. 2013.Google Scholar

Burns, LR and Rea, PA. Organizing Discovery: Wild Ducks Nested in Multilevel Ecosystems. In: Managing Discovery in the Life Sciences [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 449–89. www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781316459263A036/type/book_partGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Perennial; 2013.Google Scholar

Is it true that creativity resides in the right hemisphere of the brain? Scientific American. 1998.Google Scholar

Amabile, TM. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J Pers Soc Psychol [Internet]. 1983;45(2):357–76. http://content.apa.org/journals/psp/45/2/357Google Scholar

Manso, G. Motivating innovation. J Finance [Internet]. 2011 Oct;66(5):1823–60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01688.xGoogle Scholar

Packalen, M and Bhattacharya, J. NIH funding and the pursuit of edge science. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2020 Jun 2;117(22):12011–6. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1910160117Google Scholar

Packalen, M. Edge factors: Scientific frontier positions of nations. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2019 Mar 4;118(3):787–808. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-018-2991–4Google Scholar

Antonoyiannakis, M, Hemmelskamp, J and Kafatos, FC. The European Research Council takes flight. Cell [Internet]. 2009 Mar;136(5):805–9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867409002074Google Scholar

Veugelers, R, Wang, J and Stephan, P. Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from ERC Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2022 Aug. www.nber.org/papers/w30320.pdfGoogle Scholar

Boudreau, KJ, Guinan, EC, Lakhani, KR, et al. Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Manage Sci [Internet]. 2016 Sep;62(10):2765–83. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285Google Scholar

Ohniwa, RL and Hibino, A. Generating process of emerging topics in the life sciences. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2019 Dec 12;121(3):1549–61. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-019-03248–zGoogle Scholar

Azoulay, P, Graff Zivin, JS and Manso, G. Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J Econ [Internet]. 2011 Sep;42(3):527–54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.xGoogle Scholar

Azoulay, P, Graff Zivin, JS and Manso, G. National Institutes of Health Peer Review: Challenges and avenues for reform. Innov Policy Econ [Internet]. 2013 Jan;13:1–22. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/668237Google Scholar

Wilhelm, M. Truly Legendary Freedom: Funding, Incentives, and the Productivity of Scientists. NBER; 2019.conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f121384.pdfGoogle Scholar

Sinkjær, T. Fund ideas, not pedigree, to find fresh insight. Nature [Internet]. 2018 Mar 6;555(7695):143. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02743–2Google Scholar

Ronai, I and Griffiths, PE. The case for basic biological research. Trends Mol Med [Internet]. 2019 Feb;25(2):65–9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1471491418302272Google Scholar

Dijkgraaf, R. Curiosity-Driven Knowledge Is a Vital Form of Infrastructure [Internet]. Scientific American. 2017. www.scientificamerican.com/article/curiosity-driven-knowledge-is-a-vital-form-of-infrastructure/Google Scholar

Altman, L. Rare cancer seen in 41 homosexuals. The New York Times [Internet]. 1981 Jul 3; www.nytimes.com/1981/07/03/us/rare-cancer-seen-in-41-homosexuals.htmlGoogle Scholar

Sienkiewicz, D and Lingen C van. The added value of patient organizations [Internet]. 2017. www.eu-patient.eu/globalassets/library/publications/epf_added_value_report_final.pdfGoogle Scholar

Roehr, B. Larry Kramer: Author and founding father of AIDS activism. BMJ [Internet]. 2020 Jun 12;m2300. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.m2300Google Scholar

Woubshet, D. Let the Record Show Is an Essential Story of the AIDS Movement [Internet]. The Atlantic. 2021. www.theatlantic.com/books/archive/2021/11/sarah-schulman-let-record-show-aids-activism/620753/Google Scholar

Bix, AS. Diseases chasing money and power: Breast cancer and AIDS activism challenging authority. J Policy Hist [Internet]. 1997 Jan 14;9(1):5–32. www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0898030600005807/type/journal_articleGoogle Scholar

Visco, F. Breast cancer advocacy and public policy. Washingt Univ J Law Policy [Internet]. 2005;19. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol19/iss1/7Google Scholar

Best, RK. Disease politics and medical research funding. Am Sociol Rev [Internet]. 2012 Oct 30;77(5):780–803. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122412458509Google Scholar

Armstrong, EM, Carpenter, DP and Hojnacki, M. Whose deaths matter? Mortality, advocacy, and attention to disease in the mass media. J Health Polit Policy Law [Internet]. 2006 Aug;31(4):729–72. https://read.dukeupress.edu/jhppl/article/31/4/729-772/77240Google Scholar

Rose, SL, Highland, J, Karafa, MT, et al. Patient advocacy organizations, industry funding, and conflicts of interest. JAMA Intern Med [Internet]. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):344. http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8443Google Scholar

Fabbri, A, Parker, L, Colombo, C, et al. Industry funding of patient and health consumer organisations: Systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ [Internet]. 2020 Jan 22;l6925. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.l6925Google Scholar

Bruno, B and Rose, S. Corporate sponsorship of patient groups. BMJ [Internet]. 2020 Jan 22;m168. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.m168Google Scholar

McCoy, MS, Carniol, M, Chockley, K, et al. Conflicts of interest for patient-advocacy organizations. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017 Mar 2;376(9):880–5. www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMsr1610625Google Scholar

Moynihan, R, Albarqouni, L, Nangla, C, et al. Financial ties between leaders of influential US professional medical associations and industry: Cross sectional study. BMJ [Internet]. 2020 May 27;m1505. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.m1505Google Scholar

Nissen, SE and Wolski, K. Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular Causes. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2457–71. www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/nejmoa072761Google Scholar

Wang, AT, McCoy, CP, Murad, MH, et al. Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: Cross sectional systematic review. BMJ [Internet]. 2010 Mar 18;340(mar18 1):c1344–c1344. www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.c1344Google Scholar

Big Pharma lobby group spent record amount as reform push grows [Internet]. Bloomberg. 2019. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-22/big-pharma-lobby-group-spent-record-amount-as-reform-push-growsGoogle Scholar

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) [Internet]. LobbyFacts.eu. 2021. https://lobbyfacts.eu/representative/0e0020135cfc4775bb5a4bd0313b120d/european-federation-of-pharmaceutical-industries-and-associationsGoogle Scholar

Sekerka, L and Benishek, L. Thick as thieves? Big Pharma wields its power with the help of government regulation. Emory Corp Gov Account Rev [Internet]. 2018;113. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/ecgar/vol5/iss2/4/Google Scholar

Strategic Research Agenda [Internet]. Innovative Medicines Initiative. 2021. www.imi.europa.eu/about-imi/strategic-research-agendaGoogle Scholar

Corporate Europe Observatory. Agrofuels and the EU research budget: Public funding for private interests [Internet]. 2009. https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/sites/default/files/files/article/agrofuel_eu_research_2009.pdfGoogle Scholar

IMI Research Diverges from WHO Goals [Internet]. Spiegel International. 2015. www.spiegel.de/international/business/imi-research-diverges-from-who-goals-a-1025572.htmlGoogle Scholar

European Partnership on Innovative Health. Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing the Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe [Internet]. Brussels; 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:9f0e350e-75de-11eb-9ac9-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_5&format=PDFGoogle Scholar

Hegde, D and Mowery, DC. Politics and funding in the US public biomedical R&D system. Science [Internet]. 2008 Dec 19;322(5909):1797–8. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1158562Google Scholar

Pedersen, DB and Hendricks, VF. Science bubbles. Philos Technol [Internet]. 2014 Dec 18;27(4):503–18. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13347-013-0142–7Google Scholar

Banks, M. The one billion euro brain. Horizon: The EU Research & Innovation Magazine. 2013.Google Scholar

Rzhetsky, A, Foster, JG, Foster, IT, et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2015 Nov 24;112(47):14569–74. https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1509757112Google Scholar

Foster, JG, Rzhetsky, A and Evans, JA. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. Am Sociol Rev [Internet]. 2015 Oct 1;80(5):875–908. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122415601618Google Scholar

Miyajima, T and Yamaguchi, H. I want to but I won’t: Pluralistic ignorance inhibits intentions to take paternity leave in Japan. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2017 Sep 20;8. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01508/fullGoogle Scholar

Flack, HD. Louis Pasteur’s discovery of molecular chirality and spontaneous resolution in 1848, together with a complete review of his crystallographic and chemical work. Acta Crystallogr Sect A Found Crystallogr [Internet]. 2009 Sep 1;65(5):371–89. http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0108767309024088Google Scholar

Our History [Internet]. The Institut Pasteur. www.pasteur.fr/en/institut-pasteur/historyGoogle Scholar

Pasteur, Louis. Science History Institute. 2021.Google Scholar

Jia, T, Wang, D and Szymanski, BK. Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution. Nat Hum Behav [Internet]. 2017 Apr 20;1(4):0078. www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017–0078Google Scholar

Motz, L and Weaver, JH. The Newtonian Era. In: The Story of Astronomy [Internet]. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1995. 107–28. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4899-6309-3_8Google Scholar

The, Myers K. Elasticity of Science. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2018; www.ssrn.com/abstract=3176991Google Scholar

Hill, R, Yin, Y, Stein, C, et al. Adaptability and the pivot penalty in science. arXiv [Internet]. 2021; https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06476Google Scholar

Kelchtermans, S, Neicu, D and Veugelers, R. Off the beaten path: what drives scientists’ entry into new fields? Ind Corp Chang [Internet]. 2021 Sep 11; https://academic.oup.com/icc/advance-article/doi/10.1093/icc/dtab054/6368419Google Scholar

Acemoglu, D and Linn, J. Market size in innovation: Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Q J Econ [Internet]. 2004 Aug 1;119(3):1049–90. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-lookup/doi/10.1162/0033553041502144Google Scholar

Finkelstein, A. Static and dynamic effects of health policy: Evidence from the vaccine industry. Q J Econ [Internet]. 2004 May 1;119(2):527–64. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-lookup/doi/10.1162/0033553041382166Google Scholar

Clancy, M. Medicine and the limits of market driven innovation. New Things Under the Sun. 2021.Google Scholar

Dubois, P, de Mouzon, O, Scott‐Morton, F, et al. Market size and pharmaceutical innovation. RAND J Econ [Internet]. 2015 Oct 26;46(4):844–71. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756–2171.12113Google Scholar

Dranove, D, Garthwaite, C and Hermosilla, M. Expected Profits and The Scientific Novelty of Innovation [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2020 May. www.nber.org/papers/w27093.pdfGoogle Scholar

Byrski, D, Gaessler, F and Higgins, M. Market Size and Research: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2021 May. www.nber.org/papers/w28858.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bryan, KA, Lemus, J and Marshall, G. R&D competition and the direction of innovation. Int J Ind Organ [Internet]. 2022 May;82:102841. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167718722000170Google Scholar

Agarwal, R and Gaule, P. What drives innovation? Lessons from COVID-19 R&D. J Health Econ [Internet]. 2022 Mar;82:102591. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016762962200011XGoogle Scholar

Li, Y, Yu, S and Zhang, Y. The Successor’s Dilemma in Authoritarian Regimes: Theory and Evidence. 2015.Google Scholar

Ciampa, D and Watkins, MD. The Successor’s Dilemma. Harvard Business Review. 1999.Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Fons-Rosen, C and Zivin, JSG. Does science advance one funeral at a time? Am Econ Rev [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1;109(8):2889–920. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.20161574Google Scholar

Agrawal, A, McHale, J and Oettl, A. Why Stars Matter [Internet]. Cambridge, MA; 2014 Mar. www.nber.org/papers/w20012.pdfGoogle Scholar

Levitt, M and Levitt, JM. Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2017 Jun 20;114(25):6498–503.www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1609996114Google Scholar

Azoulay, P, Graff Zivin, JS and Manso, G. National Institutes of Health peer review: Challenges and avenues for reform. Innov Policy Econ [Internet]. 2013 Jan;13:1–22. www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/668237Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Patsali, S, Pezzoni, M and Visentin, F. The impact of research independence on PhD students’ careers: Large-scale evidence from France [Internet]. 2021. (Investments in Early Career Scientists: Data and Research Gaps, Fall 2021). https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f159357.pdfGoogle Scholar

Malmgren, RD, Ottino, JM and Nunes Amaral, LA. The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature [Internet]. 2010 Jun;465(7298):622–6. www.nature.com/articles/nature09040Google Scholar

Ma, Y, Mukherjee, S and Uzzi, B. Mentorship and protégé success in STEM fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14077–83. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1915516117Google Scholar

Vanneste, SF. Medical progress and the influenza pandemic of 1918. Mich Acad [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1;41(1):68–91. https://meridian.allenpress.com/michigan-academician/article/41/1/68/82460/Medical-Progress-and-the-Influenza-Pandemic-ofGoogle Scholar

Geist, ES. Some of the things that orthopedic surgery has done for the war. J Am Med Assoc [Internet]. 1919 Sep 20;73(12):875. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.1919.02610380001001Google Scholar

Stansbury, LG and Hess, JR. Blood transfusion in World War I: The roles of Lawrence Bruce Robertson and Oswald Hope Robertson in the “most important medical advance of the War.” Transfus Med Rev [Internet]. 2009 Jul;23(3):232–6. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0887796309000339Google Scholar

Center for the History of Medicine. The Harvard Surgical Unit [Internet]. Countway Library of Medicine. https://collections.countway.harvard.edu/onview/exhibits/show/noble-work-for-a-worthy-end/harvard-surgical-unitGoogle Scholar

Allard, G. Progress in Medicine and Surgery during the First World War [Internet]. 2012.www.reseau-canope.fr/apocalypse-10destins/en/theme-based-files/progress-in-medicine-and-surgery-during-the-first-world-war.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hoyt, K. Vaccine innovation: Lessons from World War II. J Public Health Policy [Internet]. 2006 Apr 23;27(1):38–57. http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200064Google Scholar

Gaynes, R. The discovery of penicillin – New insights after more than 75 years of clinical use. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2017 May;23(5):849–53. wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/23/5/16-1556_article.htmGoogle Scholar

Hoyt, K. How World War II spurred vaccine innovation. The Conversation. 2015.Google Scholar

Whiting, K. A science journalist explains how the Spanish flu changed the world [Internet]. World Economic Forum. 2020. www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/covid-19-how-spanish-flu-changed-world/Google Scholar

Weindling, P. Epidemics and Genocide in Eastern Europe, 1890–1945. Oxford University Press; 2000.Google Scholar

Else, H. How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing – in seven charts. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Dec 24;588(7839):553. www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03564–yGoogle Scholar

Callaway, E, Ledford, H, Viglione, G, et al. COVID and 2020: An extraordinary year for science. Nature. 2020.Google Scholar

Gibney, E. The pandemic mixed up what scientists study – and some won’t go back. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Jun 11;582(7811):173–4.www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01525–zGoogle Scholar

Adam, D. Scientists fear that “covidization” is distorting research. Nature [Internet]. 2020 Dec 17;588(7838):381–2.www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03388–wGoogle Scholar

Pai, M. Covidization of research: What are the risks? Nat Med [Internet]. 2020 Aug 1;26(8):1159–1159. www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1015–0Google Scholar

Eichengreen, B, Aksoy, CG and Saka, O. Revenge of the experts: Will COVID-19 renew or diminish public trust in science? J Public Econ [Internet]. 2021 Jan;193:104343. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0047272720302073Google Scholar

Matsuyama, W, Mitsuyama, H, Watanabe, M, et al. RETRACTED: Effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on inflammatory markers in COPD. Chest [Internet]. 2005 Dec;128(6):3817–27. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012369215496230Google Scholar

George, SL and Buyse, M. Data fraud in clinical trials. Clin Investig (Lond) [Internet]. 2015 Feb;5(2):161–73. www.future-science.com/doi/abs/10.4155/cli.14.116Google Scholar

Michalek, AM, Hutson, AD, Wicher, CP, et al. The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: A case study. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2010 Aug 17;7(8):e1000318. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318Google Scholar

Reich, ES. The Specter of Fraud. Sci Am [Internet]. 2009 Jul;301(1):24–5. www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-specter-of-fraudGoogle Scholar

Steen, RG. Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? J Med Ethics [Internet]. 2011 Apr 1;37(4):249–53. https://jme.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/jme.2010.040923Google Scholar

Katz, TJ. Propagation of errors in review articles. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2006 Sep;313(5791):1236–1236. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.313.5791.1236aGoogle Scholar

Schneider, J, Ye, D, Hill, AM, et al. Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data. Scientometrics [Internet]. 2020 Dec 14;125(3):2877–913. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03631–1Google Scholar

True Costs of Research Misconduct [Internet]. 2012. www.rcr.ucf.edu/rcr_True_Costs_Of_Research_Misconduct.pdfGoogle Scholar

Stern, AM, Casadevall, A, Steen, RG, et al. Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. Elife [Internet]. 2014 Aug 14;3. https://elifesciences.org/articles/02956Google Scholar

Jones, R, Wilsdon, J. The Biomedical Bubble: Why UK research and innovation needs a greater diversity of priorities, politics, places and people [Internet]. 2018. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/The_Biomedical_Bubble_v6.pdfGoogle Scholar

Müller, MJ, Landsberg, B, Ried, J. Fraud in science: A plea for a new culture in research. Eur J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2014 Apr 2;68(4):411–5. www.nature.com/articles/ejcn201417Google Scholar

Boetto, E, Golinelli, D, Carullo, G et al. Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them. J Med Ethics [Internet]. 2021 Dec;47(12):e19–e19. https://jme.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/medethics–2020–106639Google Scholar

The great chain of being sure about things. The Economist [Internet]. 2015; www.economist.com/briefing/2015/10/31/the-great-chain-of-being-sure-about-thingsGoogle Scholar

Charisius, H. When scientists experiment on themselves: H. pylori and ulcers. Scientific American. 2014.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. Ulcers and bacteria I: Discovery and acceptance. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci [Internet]. 1998 Mar;29(1):107–36. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1369848698000065Google Scholar

Marshall, B and Adams, PC. Helicobacter Pylori: A Nobel pursuit? Can J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2008;22(11):895–6. www.hindawi.com/journals/cjgh/2008/459810/Google Scholar

Kauffman, GB. Science by accident. Chem Eng News Arch [Internet]. 1989 Dec 4;67(49):35–8. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cen-v067n049.p035Google Scholar

Yaqub, O. Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res Policy [Internet]. 2018 Feb;47(1):169–79. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733317301774Google Scholar

Copeland, S. On serendipity in science: Discovery at the intersection of chance and wisdom. Synthese [Internet]. 2019 Jun 16;196(6):2385–406. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-017-1544–3Google Scholar

Pina e Cunha, M, Rego, A, Clegg, S, et al. The dialectics of serendipity. Eur Manag J [Internet]. 2015 Feb;33(1):9–18. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263237314001236Google Scholar

Burns, LR and Rea, PA. Organizing Discovery: Wild Ducks Nested in Multilevel Ecosystems. In: Managing Discovery in the Life Sciences [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 449–89. www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781316459263A036/type/book_partGoogle Scholar

Lane, JN, Ganguli, I, Gaule, P, et al. Engineering serendipity: When does knowledge sharing lead to knowledge production? Strateg Manag J [Internet]. 2021 Jun 24;42(6):1215–44. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.3256Google Scholar

Patra, JK, Das, G, Fraceto, LF et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnology [Internet]. 2018 Dec 19;16(1):71. https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12951-018-0392–8Google Scholar

Sharp, P, Cooney, C, Kastner, M et al. The Third Revolution: The Convergence of the Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Engineering [Internet]. Washington, DC; 2011. www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/research-science-and-technology/hibar/resources/MITwhitepaper.pdfGoogle Scholar

Coccia, M and Wang, L. Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2016 Feb 23;113(8):2057–61. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510820113Google Scholar

Convergence [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2014. www.nap.edu/catalog/18722Google Scholar

Eyre, HA, Lavretsky, H, Forbes, M, et al. Convergence science arrives: How does it relate to psychiatry? Acad Psychiatry [Internet]. 2017 Feb 10;41(1):91–9. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40596-016-0496–0Google Scholar

Imperial College London. Convergence Science Centre [Internet]. 2021. www.convergencesciencecentre.ac.uk/Google Scholar

Niiler, E. $150 M for Stanford Bio-X center. Nat Biotechnol [Internet]. 1999 Dec;17(12):1148. www.nature.com/articles/nbt1299_1148aGoogle Scholar

Esvelt, KM. Precaution: Open gene drive research. Science (80-) [Internet]. 2017 Feb 10;355(6325):589.2–590. www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aal5325Google Scholar

Rehemtulla, A. The war on cancer rages on. Neoplasia [Internet]. 2009 Dec;11(12):1252–63. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1476558609800948Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Histoire de la sexualité. Éditions Gallimard; 1976.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press; 2005.Google Scholar

Valérie Burri, R. Book Review: Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 374 pp. Sci Technol Hum Values [Internet]. 2008 Jan 1;33(1):134–7. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08959048053032041Google Scholar

Willmott, C. What’s cropping up in this issue? Biochem (Lond) [Internet]. 2020 Aug 17;42(4):3. https://portlandpress.com/biochemist/article/42/4/3/225993/What-s-cropping-up-in-this-issueGoogle Scholar

Zhang, JY. The “credibility paradox” in China’s science communication: Views from scientific practitioners. Public Underst Sci [Internet]. 2015 Nov 24;24(8):913–27. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963662515598249Google Scholar

Fiebrich, CA. History of surface weather observations in the United States. Earth-Science Rev [Internet]. 2009 Apr;93(3–4):77–84. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012825209000142Google Scholar

Strasser, BJ, Baudry, J, Mahr, D, et al. “Citizen Science”? Rethinking science and public participation. Sci Technol Stud [Internet]. 2018 Oct 30;52–76. https://sciencetechnologystudies.journal.fi/article/view/60425Google Scholar

Wicks, P, Vaughan, TE, Massagli, MP, et al. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat Biotechnol [Internet]. 2011 May 24;29(5):411–4. www.nature.com/articles/nbt.1837Google Scholar

Lewis, D. History and perspective on DIY closed looping. J Diabetes Sci Technol [Internet]. 2019 Jul 22;13(4):790–3. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1932296818808307Google Scholar

Goldfarb, JL and Kriner, DL. Building public support for science spending. Sci Commun [Internet]. 2017 Feb 1;39(1):77–100. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1075547016688325Google Scholar

Funk, C. Key findings about Americans’ Center. 2020.Google Scholar

Pham, D. Public engagement is key for the future of science research. npj Sci Learn [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1;1(1):16010. www.nature.com/articles/npjscilearn201610Google Scholar

Liang, X, Su, LY-F, Yeo, SK, et al. Building Buzz. Journal Mass Commun Q [Internet]. 2014 Dec 12;91(4):772–91. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077699014550092Google Scholar

Feynman, R. The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen Scientist. Addison-Wesley; 1998.Google Scholar

Reynolds, BR. There’s a Lot of Uncertainty Right Now – This Is What Science Says That Does to Our Minds, Bodies. University of California San Francisco. 2020.Google Scholar

Kreps, SE and Kriner, DL. Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Adv [Internet]. 2020 Oct 23;6(43). www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd4563Google Scholar

Norn, MT. What do we know about risk-taking in science and science funding? A policy-oriented survey of the literature. 2019.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. Embracing the uncertainties. The New York Times. 2020 April 7. www.nytimes.com/2020/04/07/science/coronavirus-uncertainty-scientific-trust.htmlGoogle Scholar

Tetlock, P and Gardner, D. Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York: Crown Publishing Group; 2015.Google Scholar

Freedman, B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141–5. www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM198707163170304Google Scholar

Emergence of Pharmaceutical Science and Industry: 1870–1930. The top pharmaceuticals that changed the world [Internet]. 2005; https://pubsapp.acs.org/cen/coverstory/83/8325/8325emergence.htmlGoogle Scholar

Metcalf, S. Neoliberalism: The idea that swallowed the world. The Guardian. 2017.Google Scholar

Münch, R. Academic Capitalism. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2016. https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e–15Google Scholar

Brosnan, C. Bourdieu and the Future of Knowledge in the University. In: Bourdieusian Prospects. Routledge; 2017.Google Scholar

Johnson, DR. A Fractured Profession: Commercialism and Conflict in Academic Science [Internet]. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2017. https://jhupbooks.press.jhu.edu/title/fractured-professionGoogle Scholar

Caulfield, T and Ogbogu, U. The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits. BMC Med Ethics [Internet]. 2015 Dec 14;16(1):70. http://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-015-0064–2Google Scholar

Critchley, CR and Nicol, D. Understanding the impact of commercialization on public support for scientific research: Is it about the funding source or the organization conducting the research? Public Underst Sci [Internet]. 2011 May 9;20(3):347–66. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963662509346910Google Scholar

Critchley, CR. Public opinion and trust in scientists: The role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Underst Sci [Internet]. 2008 Jul 22;17(3):309–27. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963662506070162Google Scholar

Montalban, M and Sakinc, ME. Financialization and productive models in the pharmaceutical industry. Ind Corp Chang [Internet]. 2013 Aug 1;22(4):981–1030. https://academic.oup.com/icc/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/icc/dtt023Google Scholar

Busfield, J. Documenting the financialisation of the pharmaceutical industry. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2020 Aug;258:113096. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953620303154Google Scholar

Nielsen, MW and Andersen, JP. Global citation inequality is on the rise. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2021 Feb 16;118(7):e2012208118. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.2012208118Google Scholar

Jones, R and Wilsdon, J. The incentives for elite biomedical research have become decoupled from basic health needs [Internet]. www.nesta.org.uk/feature/health-design/incentives-elite-biomedical-research-have-become-decoupled-basic-health-needs/Google Scholar

Baru, RV and Mohan, M. Globalisation and neoliberalism as structural drivers of health inequities. Heal Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2018 Oct 9;16(S1):91. https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-018-0365–2Google Scholar

McCoy, D, Kembhavi, G, Patel, J, et al. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s grant-making programme for global health. Lancet [Internet]. 2009 May;373(9675):1645–53. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673609605717Google Scholar

Levin, Y. The Moral Challenge of Modern Science. 2006.Google Scholar

Harris, J. Scientific research is a moral duty. J Med Ethics [Internet]. 2005 Apr 1;31(4):242–8. https://jme.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/jme.2005.011973Google Scholar

Owen, R, Macnaghten, P and Stilgoe, J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Sci Public Policy [Internet]. 2012 Dec 1;39(6):751–60. https://academic.oup.com/spp/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/scipol/scs093Google Scholar

Porsdam Mann, S, Donders, Y, Mitchell, C, et al. Opinion: Advocating for science progress as a human right. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2018 Oct 23;115(43):10820–3. www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/10.1073/pnas.1816320115Google Scholar

Yong, E. How Science Beat the Virus [Internet]. The Atlantic. 2020. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/01/science-covid-19-manhattan-project/617262/Google Scholar