Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T07:11:06.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Twelve - Evolutionary indirect effects

examples from introduced plant and herbivore interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Jennifer A. Lau
Affiliation:
W. K. Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Oswald Schmitz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Biological invasions result in a wide range of novel ecological and evolutionary interactions with native community members. Invaders may be predators or competitors, with direct negative impacts on native taxa, and they may be prey or mutualists, which could have positive effects on native taxa. In addition to these initial direct effects, as invading species become integrated into native communities, they begin to interact both directly and indirectly with a multitude of native taxa in the invaded community. While the direct effects of biological invasions on natives are well appreciated, the indirect effects of biological invasions remain relatively unstudied (White et al. 2006), especially from an evolutionary perspective. However, indirect effects are likely common, can be strong, and may impact an even wider array of community members than the initial direct effects resulting from the invasion.

In this chapter, I first briefly discuss: (1) the evidence for evolutionary changes in both natives and invaders during the invasion process and (2) the many potential and documented indirect effects of invaders on natives. I then combine these two themes to address the main thesis: how evolutionary changes in both natives and invaders during the invasion process can alter interactions with additional community members (i.e. ‘evolutionary indirect effects’). While specific tests for evolutionary indirect effects in the context of biological invasions are still rare, I present a series of examples linking evolutionary change and strong indirect effects to illustrate the possibility for important evolutionary indirect effects. I conclude by discussing open questions and experimental designs that could explicitly test the importance of evolutionary indirect effects to natural communities and the study of biological invasions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 221 - 243
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. A. 1995 Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communitiesAmerican Naturalist 146 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. A. 2000 Character shifts of prey species that share predatorsAmerican Naturalist 156 S45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abrams, P. A.Chen, X. 2002 The effect of competition between prey species on the evolution of their vulnerabilities to a shared predatorEvolutionary Ecology Research 4 897Google Scholar
Abrams, P. A.Fung, S. R. 2010 The impact of adaptive defence on top-down and bottom-up effects in systems with intraguild predationEvolutionary Ecology Research 12 307Google Scholar
Abrams, P. A.Matsuda, H. 1993 Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behaviour in a two-prey-one-predator systemEvolutionary Ecology 7 312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. A.Vos, M. 2003 Adaptation, density dependence and the responses of trophic level abundances to mortalityEvolutionary Ecology Research 5 1113Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. A.Kotanen, P. M. 2003 Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experimentEcology Letters 6 712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. A.Lau, J. A.Hambäck, P. A. 2006 Community heterogeneity and the evolution of interactions between plants and insect herbivoresQuarterly Review of Biology 81 349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allan, E.Pannell, J. R. 2009 Rapid divergence in physiological and life-history traits between northern and southern populations of the British introduced neo-species, Oikos 118 1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atsatt, P. R.O’Dowd, D. J. 1976 Plant defense guildsScience 193 24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, H. G. 1967 Support for Baker’s Law as a ruleEvolution 21 853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. C. H.Colautti, R. IEckert, C. G. 2008 Plant reproductive systems and evolution during biological invasionMolecular Ecology 17 373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, S. C. H.Emerson, B.Mallet, J. 1996 The reproductive biology and genetics of island plants (and discussion)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 351 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. C. H.Morgan, M. T.Husband, B. C. 1989 The dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous (Pontederiaceae)Evolution 43 1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkman, C. W.Siepielski, A. M.Parchman, T. L. 2008 The local introduction of strongly interacting species and the loss of geographic variation in species and species interactionsMolecular Ecology 17 395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blossey, B.Notzold, R. 1995 Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesisJournal of Ecology 83 887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowicz, V. A. 2001 Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant-pathogen relations?Ecology 82 3057Google Scholar
Bossdorf, O.Auge, H.Lafuma, L. 2005 Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populationsOecologia 144 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bossdorf, O.Lipowsky, A.Prati, D. 2008 Selection of preadapted populations allowed to invade Central EuropeDiversity and Distributions 14 676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaway, R. M.Ridenour, W. M.Laboski, T.Weir, T.Vivanco, J. M. 2005 Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plantsJournal of Ecology 93 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, L.Escarre, J.Vrieling, K.Sans, F. X. 2009 Palatability to a generalist herbivore, defence and growth of invasive and native species: testing the evolution of increased competitive ability hypothesisOecologia 159 95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, D.Cappuccino, N. 2005 Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plantsJournal of Ecology 93 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. P.Boyd, C. 1992 Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural history with the historyEvolution 46 1052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S. P.Dingle, H.Klassen, S. P. 1997 Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bugEvolution 51 1182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S. P.Loye, J. E.Dingle, H. 2005 And the beak shall inherit: evolution in response to invasionEcology Letters 8 944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colautti, R. I.Ricciardi, A.Grigorovich, I. A.MacIsaac, H. J. 2004 Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis?Ecology Letters 7 721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colautti, R. I.White, N. A.Barrett, S. C. H. 2010 Variation of self-incompatibility within invasive populations of purple loosestrife ( L.) from eastern North AmericaInternational Journal of Plant Sciences 171 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, J. K. 2003 Artificial selection: a powerful tool for ecologistsEcology 84 1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G. W. 2004 Alien Species and Evolution: The Evolutionary Ecology of Exotic Plants, Animals, Microbes, and Interacting Native SpeciesWashington DCIsland PressGoogle Scholar
Crutsinger, G. M.Collins, M. D.Fordyce, J. A. 2006 Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem processScience 313 966CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crutsinger, G. M.Souza, L.Sanders, N. J. 2008 Intraspecific diversity and dominant genotypes resist plant invasionsEcology Letters 11 16Google ScholarPubMed
Davis, H. G. 2005 -Selected traits in an invasive populationEvolutionary Ecology 19 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, L. L.Whitham, T. G. 1996 Genetically based plant resistance traits affect arthropods, fungi, and birdsOecologia 106 400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dlugosch, K. M.Parker, I. M. 2008 Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecksEcology Letters 11 701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donohue, K.Messiqua, D.Pyle, E. H.Heschel, M. S.Schmitt, J. 2000 Evidence of adaptive divergence in plasticity: density- and site-dependent selection on shade-avoidance responses in Evolution 54 1956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorn, L. A.Pyle, E. H.Schmitt, J. 2000 Plasticity to light cues and resources in : testing for adaptive value and costsEvolution 54 1982CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudley, S. A.Schmitt, J. 1996 Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in American Naturalist 147 445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facelli, E.Smith, S. E.Facelli, J. M.Christophersen, H. M.Smith, F. A. 2010 Underground friends or enemies: model plants help to unravel direct and indirect effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant competitionNew Phytologist 185 1050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. 1930 The Genetical Theory of Natural SelectionOxfordClarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C.Smith, A. K. 2005 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence visitation rates of pollinating insectsEcological Entomology 30 600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C.West, H. M. 1994 Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and foliar-feeding insects in LNew Phytologist 128 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, C. A.Cobb, N. S.Whitman, T. G. 1997 Three-way interactions among ectomycorrhizal mutualists, scale insects, and resistant and susceptible pinyon pinesAmerican Naturalist 149 824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genton, B. J.Kotanen, P. M.Cheptou, P. O.Adolphe, C.Shykoff, J. A. 2005 Enemy release but no evolutionary loss of defence in a plant invasion: an inter-continental reciprocal transplant experimentOecologia 146 404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. E.Werner, P. A. 1983 Equivalence of competitors in plant communities – A null hypothesis and field experimental approachAmerican Journal of Botany 70 1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncalves-Souza, T.Omena, P. M.Souza, J. C.Romero, G. Q. 2008 Trait-mediated effects on flowers: artificial spiders deceive pollinators and decrease plant fitnessEcology 89 2407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gribben, P. E.Byers, J. E.Clements, M. 2009 Behavioural interactions between ecosystem engineers control community species richnessEcology Letters 12 1127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, W.Feng, Y.Ridenour, W. M. 2009 Novel weapons and invasion: biogeographic differences in the competitive effects of and its root exudate (±)-catechinOecologia 159 803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herms, D. A.Mattson, W. J. 1992 The dilemma of plants: to grow or defendQuarterly Review of Biology 67 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. D. 1994 Linking species and ecosystems: where’s Darwin?Jones, C. G.Lawton, J. H.Linking Species and EcosystemsNew YorkChapman and Hall273Google Scholar
Hughes, A. R.Inouye, B. D.Johnson, M. T. J.Underwood, N.Vellend, M. 2008 Ecological consequences of genetic diversityEcology Letters 11 609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. T. J. 2008 Bottom-up effects of plant genotype on aphids, ants, and predatorsEcology 89 145CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. T. J.Lajeunesse, M. J.Agrawal, A. A. 2006 Additive and interactive effects of plant genotypic diversity on arthropod communities and plant fitnessEcology Letters 9 24Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. T. J.Smith, S. D.Rausher, M. D. 2009 Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivoresProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 18079CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koricheva, J.Gange, A. C.Jones, T. 2009 Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on insect herbivores: a meta-analysisEcology 90 2088CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koslow, J. M.DeAngelis, D. L. 2006 Host mating system and the prevalence of disease in a plant populationProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273 1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N.Odling-Smee, F. J.Feldman, M. W. 1999 Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecologyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96 10242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lankau, R. 2010 Soil microbial communities alter allelopathic competition between and a native speciesBiological Invasions 12 2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankau, R. A.Nuzzo, V.Spyreas, G.Davis, A. S. 2009 Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plantProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 15362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambrinos, J. G. 2004 How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamicsEcology 85 2061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, J. A. 2008 Beyond the ecological: biological invasions alter natural selection on a native plant speciesEcology 89 1023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, J. A. 2012 Evolutionary indirect effects of biological invasionsOecologiaCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C. E. 2002 Selection and physiological evolution during biological invasion eventsIntegrative and Comparative Biology 42 1264Google Scholar
Leger, E. A. 2008 The adaptive value of remnant native plants in invaded communities: an example from the Great BasinEcological Applications 18 1226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leimu, R.Koricheva, J. 2006 A meta-analysis of genetic correlations between plant resistances to multiple enemiesAmerican Naturalist 168 E15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, H.Stiling, P. 2006 Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysisBiological Invasions 8 1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H.Stiling, P.Pemberton, R. W. 2007 Does enemy release matter for invasive plants? Evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among invasive, non-invasive and native congenersBiological Invasions 9 773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddox, G. D.Root, R. B. 1990 Structure of the encounter between goldenrod () and its diverse insect faunaEcology 71 2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, H.Hori, M.Abrams, P. A. 1994 Effects of predator-specific defence on community complexityEvolutionary Ecology 8 628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mealor, B. A.Hild, A. L. 2007 Post-invasion evolution of native plant populations: a test of biological resilienceOikos 116 1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menge, B. A. 1995 Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interaction webs – Patterns and importanceEcological Monographs 65 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. E. 1995 Evolution of L (Cruciferae) populations in intra- and interspecific competitionEvolution 49 1125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, C. E.Power, A. G. 2003 Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogensNature 421 625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Odling-Smee, F. J.Laland, K. N.Feldman, M. W. 2003 Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in EvolutionPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. D.Burkepile, D. E.Hay, M. E. 2006 Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasionsScience 311 1459CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. A.Malek, W.Parker, I. M. 2006 Growth of an invasive legume is symbiont limited in newly occupied habitatsDiversity and Distributions 12 563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, F.Garant, D.Hendry, A. P. 2009 Eco-evolutionary dynamicsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 364 1483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, B. L.Shine, R. 2004 Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 17150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelman, E. H.Loon, J. J. A.Dicke, M. 2008 Consequences of variation in plant defense for biodiversity at higher trophic levelsTrends in Plant Science 13 534CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, D. M.Palkovacs, E. P. 2009 Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary playPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 364 1629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulton, J. L.Bryla, D.Koide, R. T.Stephenson, A. G. 2002 Mycorrhizal infection and high soil phosphorus improve vegetative growth and the female and male functions in tomatoNew Phytologist 154 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preisser, E. L.Bolnick, D. I.Benard, M. F. 2005 Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactionsEcology 86 501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambuda, T. D.Johnson, S. D. 2004 Breeding systems of invasive alien plants in South Africa: does Baker’s rule apply?Diversity and Distributions 10 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rausher, M. D. 1996 Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants and their natural enemiesTrends in Genetics 12 212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, D. M.Allsopp, N.D’Antonio, C. M.Milton, S. J.Rejmanek, M. 2000 Plant invasions: the role of mutualismsBiological Reviews 75 65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridenour, W. M.Vivanco, J. M.Feng, Y. L.Horiuchi, J.Callaway, R. M. 2008 No evidence for trade-offs: plants from America are better competitors and defendersEcological Monographs 78 369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, R. B.Cappuccino, N. 1992 Patterns in population change and the organization of the insect community associated with goldenrodEcological Monographs 62 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sax, D. F.Stachowicz, J. J.Brown, J. H. 2007 Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasionsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 22 465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schueller, S. K. 2004 Self-pollination in island and mainland populations of the introduced hummingbird-pollinated plant, (Solanaceae)American Journal of Botany 91 672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. A.Miller, R. M.Jastrow, J. D.Rivetta, C. V.Bever, J. D. 2001 Evidence of a mycorrhizal mechanism for the adaptation of (Poaceae) to high- and low-nutrient prairiesAmerican Journal of Botany 88 1650CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweitzer, J. A.Bailey, J. K.Hart, S. C.Whitham, T. G. 2005 Nonadditive effects of mixing cottonwood genotypes on litter decomposition and nutrient dynamicsEcology 86 2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, J. A.Madritch, M. D.Bailey, J. K. 2008 From genes to ecosystems: the genetic basis of condensed tannins and their role in nutrient regulation in a model systemEcosystems 11 1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, E. K.Bever, J. D.Maron, J. L. 2009 Evidence for the evolution of reduced mycorrhizal dependence during plant invasionEcology 90 1055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siemann, E.Rogers, W. E. 2003 Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetleEcological Applications 13 1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stief, P.Holker, F. 2006 Trait-mediated indirect effects of predatory fish on microbial mineralization in aquatic sedimentsEcology 87 3152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y.Lau, J. A.Carroll, S. P. 2006 Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities?Ecology Letters 9 354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, S. C.Bazzaz, F. A. 1993 The genetic component in plant size hierarchies: norms of reaction to density in a speciesEcological Monographs 63 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchin, M. E.Lafferty, K. D.Dobson, A. P.McKenzie, V. J.Kuris, A. M. 2003 Introduced species and their missing parasitesNature 421 628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utsumi, S. 2011 Eco-evolutionary dynamics in herbivorous insect communities mediated by induced plant responsesPopulation Ecology 53 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, S.Nakamura, M.Ohgushi, T. 2009 Community consequences of herbivore-induced bottom-up trophic cascades: the importance of resource heterogeneityJournal of Animal Ecology 78 953CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhoeven, K. J. F.Biere, A.Harvey, J. A.van der Putten, W. H. 2009 Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naïve?Ecology Letters 12 107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogelsang, K. M.Bever, J. D. 2009 Mycorrhizal densities decline in association with nonnative plants and contribute to plant invasionEcology 90 399CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardle, D. A.Bardgett, R. D.Klironomos, J. N. 2004 Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biotaScience 304 1629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, E. E.Peacor, S. D. 2003 A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communitiesEcology 84 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M.Wilson, J. C.Clarke, A. R. 2006 Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biologyDiversity and Distributions 12 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, K. D.Gabler, C. A. 2008 Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potentialDiversity and Distributions 14 569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. L.Auge, H.Maron, J. L. 2008 Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardensOecologia 157 239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, B. E.Husband, B. C.Klironomos, J. N. 2005 Effects of a belowground mutualism on an aboveground mutualismEcology Letters 8 218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, L. M.Elzinga, J. A.Biere, A. 2004 Increased susceptibility to enemies following introduction in the invasive plant Ecology Letters 7 813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C. L.Byers, J. E.Cottingham, K. L. 2007 Parasites alter community structureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 9335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, C. Y.Julien, M. H.Fatemi, M. 2010 Phenotypic divergence during the invasion of in Australia and France: evidence for selection-driven evolutionEcology Letters 13 32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×