Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:52:00.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Art and Science of Negotiation: De-politicizing and Technicizing Negotiations

from PART I - WTO Accessions and the New Trade Multilateralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2017

Micheline Calmy-Rey
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
Svenja Rauch
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
Alexei Kireyev
Affiliation:
International Monetary Fund Institute, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization
Get access

Summary

Abstract

On 16 December 2011, the Russian Federation signed the protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), marking the end of a long and complex negotiation process. At the end of 2010, Switzerland had agreed to facilitate the accession of the Russian Federation to the WTO by mediating an agreement between Georgia and the Russian Federation over customs procedures for trade to and from the disputed territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In its role as facilitator, Switzerland used a process-based approach, narrowing gaps, seeking convergences, organizing formal and informal consultations in flexible and different formats, using technical knowledge and producing draft texts for decision-making. This process-based approach, which was developed within the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs and aimed at establishing new channels of communication and negotiating techniques, was baptized ‘diplomatic engineering’. Diplomatic engineering splits a complex negotiation problem into sub-problems that can be solved individually and irrespective of geopolitical and trade policy considerations. It de-politicizes them by focusing on the technical aspects of a dispute, thus creating space for a rational dialogue. While the Swiss mediation between Georgia and the Russian Federation remains little known by the public, important lessons for future accession negotiations can be drawn from this case study. In particular, the diplomatic engineering approach can be used by the WTO to underline its role as a convener, negotiating platform, hub of technical expertise and honest broker.

In June 1993, the Russian Federation applied for accession to the WTO, then still the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). On 14 July of that year, a working party – which would subsequently become a WTO working party – was formed. Negotiations continued for many years and were not concluded until 2011, with the Russian Federation formally joining the WTO in August 2012. They included bilateral trade negotiations between the Russian Federation and Georgia (which had been a member of the WTO since 2000), which were concluded in 2004.

Since 2008, however, the customs crossings in the disputed territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia have been de facto under Russian control. In view of this altered situation, Georgia argued that its bilateral negotiations with Russia were not in fact closed, and it intended to veto the Russian Federation's accession to the WTO.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trade Multilateralism in the Twenty-First Century
Building the Upper Floors of the Trading System through WTO Accessions
, pp. 55 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambühl, M. and Langenegger, T. (2015). ‘Negotiation Engineering: A Structured Problem-Solving Approach to Negotiation’, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research Paper Series, 15-01. Zurich, ETH.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2nd edition. London, Random House Business Books.Google Scholar
Hopmann, P. T. (2010). ‘Synthesizing Rationalist and Constructivist Perspectives on Negotiated Cooperation’, in Zartman, I. W. and Touval, S. (eds.), International Cooperation: The Extents and Limits of Multilateralism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
Placidi-Frot, D. (2013). ‘Les négociations internationales à travers le prisme des sciences sociales’, in Petiteville, F. and Placidi-Frot, D. (eds.), Négociations internationales. Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 27–75.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×