Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- From Fear to Torture
- The Legal Narrative
- Timeline
- Missing Documents
- Biographical Sketches
- Memoranda
- Reports
- February 2004 (The ICRC Report)
- March 2004 (The Taguba Report)
- April 2004
- July 2004 (The Mikolashek Report)
- August 2004 (The Schlesinger Report)
- May 12, 2004 (Vice Admiral Church's Brief)
- October 2004 (Department of Defense Response to the Associated Press)
- August 2004 (The Fay-Jones Report)
- August 9, 2004
- Afterword
- Appendices
August 9, 2004
from Reports
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- From Fear to Torture
- The Legal Narrative
- Timeline
- Missing Documents
- Biographical Sketches
- Memoranda
- Reports
- February 2004 (The ICRC Report)
- March 2004 (The Taguba Report)
- April 2004
- July 2004 (The Mikolashek Report)
- August 2004 (The Schlesinger Report)
- May 12, 2004 (Vice Admiral Church's Brief)
- October 2004 (Department of Defense Response to the Associated Press)
- August 2004 (The Fay-Jones Report)
- August 9, 2004
- Afterword
- Appendices
Summary
REPORT
INTRODUCTION
The use of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by United States personnel in the interrogation of prisoners captured in the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts has brought shame on the nation and undermined our standing in the world. While the U.S. government has acknowledged, and is moving to punish, the acts at Abu Ghraib that have been documented on videotape, this does not address the substantial, fundamental concerns regarding U.S. interrogation policy and the treatment of detainees.
The U.S. government maintains that its policies comport with the requirements of law, and that the violations at Abu Ghraib represent isolated instances of individual misconduct. But there apparently has been a widespread pattern of abusive detention methods. Executive Branch memoranda were developed to justify interrogation procedures that are in conflict with long-held interpretations and understandings of the reach of treaties and laws governing treatment of detainees. Whether and to what extent the memoranda were relied upon by U.S. officials may be open to question, but it is clear that those legal interpretations do not represent sound policy, risk undercutting the government's ability to assert any high moral ground in its “war on terrorism”, and put Americans at risk of being tortured or subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by governments and others willing to cite U.S. actions as a pretext for their own misconduct.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Torture PapersThe Road to Abu Ghraib, pp. 1132 - 1164Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005