Abergel, A. et al. (2011), “Planck early results. XXIV. Dust in the diffuse interstellar medium and the galactic halo”, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 536.Google Scholar

Adams, H. & Carlsson, G. (2015), “Evasion paths in mobile sensor networks”, International Journal of Robotics Research 34(1), 90–104.Google Scholar

Adams, H., Emerson, T., Kirby, M., Neville, R., Peterson, C., Shipman, P. et al. (2017), “Persistence images: a stable vector representation of persistent homology”, Journal of Machine Learning Research 18(1), 218–252.Google Scholar

Adler, R. (1981), The Geometry of Random Fields, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Adler, R. &Taylor, J. (2007), RandomFields and Geometry, Springer Monographs inMathematics, Springer.Google Scholar

Adler, R., Bobrowski, O., Borman, M., Subag, E. & Weinberger, S. (2010), “Persistent homology for random fields and complexes”, in Borrowing Strength: Theory Powering Applications. A Festschrift for Lawrence D. Brown, J. O. Berger, T. T. Cai, and I. M. Johnstone eds., IMS Collections Vol. 6, Institute of Mathematical Science.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, C. (2018), Neural Networks and Deep Learning, Springer.Google Scholar

Artin, M. & Mazur, B. (1986), Étale Homotopy, Springer.Google Scholar

Baez, J. (2010), “This week’s finds in mathematical physics”. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week293.htmlGoogle Scholar

Bank, P. D. (1971), “Protein data bank”, Nature New Biology 233, 223.Google Scholar

Bardeen, J., Bond, J., Kaiser, N. & Szalay, A. (1986), “The statistics of peaks of gaussian random fields”, Astrophysical Journal 304, 15–61.Google Scholar

Bauer, U., Kerber, M., Reininghaus, J. & Wagner, H. (2017), “Phat – persistent homology algorithms toolbox”, Journal of Symbolic Computation 78, 76–90.Google Scholar

Bennett, C., Hill, R., Hinshaw, G., Nolta, M., Odegard, N., Page, L. et al., (2003), “First-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap)* observations: foreground emission”, Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 148(1), 97–117.Google Scholar

Berwald, J., Gidea, M. & Vejdemo-Johansson, M. (2014), “Automatic recognition and tagging of topologically different regimes in dynamical systems”, Discontinuity, Nonlinearity and Complexity 3(4), 413–426.Google Scholar

Biscio, C. & Møller, J. (2016), ‘The accumulated persistence function, a new useful functional summary statistic for topological data analysis, with a view to brain artery trees and spatial point process applications’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00630.Google Scholar

Bishop, R. & Crittenden, R. (1964), Geometry of Manifolds, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Blumberg, A., Gal, I., Mandell, M. & Pancia, M. (2014), “Robust statistics, hypothesis testing, and confidence intervals for persistent homology on metric measure spaces”, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 14(4), 745–789.Google Scholar

Bonnet, O. (1848), “Memoire sur la theorie generale des surfaces”, Journal de l’École polytechnique 19, pp. 1–146.Google Scholar

Borg, I. & Groenen, P. (1997), Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, Springer.Google Scholar

Borsuk, K. (1948), “On the imbedding of systems of compacta in simplicial complexes”, Fundamenta Mathematicae 35(1), 217–234.Google Scholar

Borsuk, K. (1975), Shape Theory, PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar

Bottou, L., Cortes, C., Denker, J., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Jackel, L. et al., (1994), “Comparison of classifier methods: a case study in handwritten digit recognition”, in Pattern Recognition, 1994, Vol. 2, Conference B: Computer Vision & Image Processing Proceedings of the 12th International IAPR Conference, IEEE, pp. 77–82.Google Scholar

Bronstein, A. M., Bronstein, M. M. & Kimmel, R. (2008), Numerical Geometry of Non-Rigid Shapes, Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Bubenik, P. (2015), “Statistical topological data analysis using persistence landscapes”, Journal of Machine Learning Research 16(1), 77–102.Google Scholar

Buneman, P. (1974), “A note on the metric properties of trees”, Journal of Combinatorial Theory B 17, 48–50.Google Scholar

Burago, D., Burago, Y. & Ivanov, S. (2001), A Course in Metric Geometry, Vol. 33 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Busaryev, O., Dey, T., Sun, J. & Wang, Y. (2010), “ShortLoop software for computing loops in a shortest homology basis”, Software, https://web.cse.ohio-state.edu/~dey.8/shortloop.html.Google Scholar

Cang, Z. & Wei, G. (2017), ‘Topology based deep convolutional and multi-task neural networks for biomolecular property predictions’, PLoS Computational Biology 13(7).Google Scholar

Cang, Z. & Wei, G. (2018), ‘Integration of element specific persistent homology and machine learning for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction’, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 34(2), e2914.Google Scholar

Cang, Z. & Wei, G. (2020), ‘Persistent cohomology for data with multicomponent heterogeneous information’, SIAM Journal Mathematics of Data Science 2(2), 396–418.Google Scholar

Cang, Z., Mu, L. & Wei, G. (2018), ‘Representability of algebraic topology for biomolecules in machine learning based scoring and virtual screening’, PLoS Computational Biology 14(1).Google Scholar

Carlsson, G. & de Silva, V. (2010), “Zigzag persistence”, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 10(4), 367–405.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G. & Filippenko, B. (2020), “The space of sections of a smooth function”, arXiv preprint: arXiv:2006.12023.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G. & Gabrielsson, R. (2020), “Topological approaches to deep learning”. In Topological Data Analysis, Proceedings of Abel Symposium 2018, Springer, pp. 119–146.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G. & Kališnik Verovšek, S. (2016), “Symmetric and r-symmetric tropical polynomials and rational functions”, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 220, 3610–3627.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G. & Zomorodian, A. (2009), “The theory of multidimensional persistence”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 42(1), 71–93.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G., Zomorodian, A., Collins, A. and Guibas, L. (2005a), “Persistence barcodes for shapes”, in Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Geometry Processing, ACM, pp. 124–135.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G., Zomorodian, A., Collins, A. &Guibas, L. (2005b), “Persistence barcodes for shapes”, International Journal of Shape Modeling 11(2), 149–187.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G., Ishkhanov, T., de Silva, V. & Zomorodian, A. (2008), “On the local behavior of spaces of natural images”, International Journal of Computer Vision 76(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Carlsson, G., de Silva, V. & Morozov, D. (2009), “Zigzag persistent homology and real-valued functions”, in Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry ACM.Google Scholar

Carrière, M. & Oudot, S. (2018), ‘Structure and stability of the one-dimensional mapper’, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 18(6), 1333–1396.Google Scholar

Čech, E. (1932), “Höherdimensionale Homotopiegruppen”, Verhandlungen des Internationalen Mathematikerkongress 2, 203.Google Scholar

Chan, J., Carlsson, G. & Rabadan, R. (2013), “The topology of viral evolution”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(46), 18566–18571.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, S. (2008), Crystallography and the World of Symmetry, Springer.Google Scholar

Chazal, F., Cohen-Steiner, D., Guibas, L., Memoli, F. & Oudot, S. (2009), “Gromov–Hausdorff stable signatures for shapes using persistence”, in Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing 2009, Vol. 28.Google Scholar

Chazal, F., Cohen-Steiner, D. & Merigot, Q. (2011), “Geometric inference for probability measures”, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 11(6), 733–751.Google Scholar

Chazal, F., de Silva, V., Glisse, M. & Oudot, S. (2016), The Structure and Stability of Persistence Modules, Springer.Google Scholar

Chung, Y.-M. & Lawson, A. (2019), ‘Persistence curves: a canonical framework for summarizing persistence diagrams’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07768.Google Scholar

Chung, Y.-M., Hu, C.-S., Lawson, A. & Smyth, C. (2019), “TopoResNet: a hybrid deep learning architecture and its application to skin lesion classification”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.08607.Google Scholar

CMU Graphics Lab (2012), “CMU graphics lab motion capture database”, http://mocap.cs. cmu.edu/, accessed November 2012.Google Scholar

Cohen-Steiner, D., Edelsbrunner, H. & Harer, J. (2007), “Stability of persistence diagrams”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 37(1), 103–120.Google Scholar

Cohen-Steiner, D., Edelsbrunner, H., Harer, J. & Mileyko, Y. (2010), “Lipschitz functions have l ^p-stable persistence”, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 10(2), 127–139.Google Scholar

Collins, A., Zomorodian, A., Carlsson, G. & Guibas, L. (2004), “A barcode shape descriptor for curve point cloud data”, Computers & Graphics 28(6), 881–894.Google Scholar

Curry, J. (2013), “Sheaves, cosheaves and applications”, arXiv E-Print 1303.3255.Google Scholar

Dalbec, J. (1999), “Multisymmetric functions”, Beiträge Algebra Geometrie. 40(1), 27–51.Google Scholar

de Silva, V. & Carlsson, G. (2004), “Topological estimation using witness complexes”, in M. Alexa & S. Rusinkiewicz, eds. Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Point-Based Graphics.Google Scholar

de Silva, V. & Ghrist, R. (2006), “Coordinate-free coverage in sensor networks with controlled boundaries via homology”, International Journal of Robotics Research 25(12), 1205–1222.Google Scholar

de Silva, V., Morozov, D. & Vejdemo-Johansson, M. (2011), “Persistent cohomology and circular coordinates”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 45(4), 737–759.Google Scholar

de Silva, V., Skraba, P. & Vejdemo-Johansson, M. (2012), “Topological analysis of recurrent systems”, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Algebraic Topology and Machine Learning, NIPSGoogle Scholar

de Silva, V., Munch, E. & Patel, A. (2016), “Categorified reeb graphs”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 854–906.Google Scholar

Derksen, H. &Weyman, J. (2005), ‘Quiver representations’, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52(2), 200–206.Google Scholar

Dey, T. K., Sun, J. & Wang, Y. (2011), “Approximating cycles in a shortest basis of the first homology group from point data”, Inverse Problems 27(12), 124004.Google Scholar

Diaconis, P. & Friedman, J. (1980), “M and n plots”, Technical report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Donaldson, S. (1984), “Gauge theory and topology”, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians pp. 641–645.Google Scholar

Donoho, D. (1999), “Wedgelets: nearly minimax estimation of edges”, Annals of Statistics 27, 859–897.Google Scholar

Doolittle, W. (1999), “Phylogenetic classification and the universal tree”, Science 284(5423), 2124–2129.Google Scholar

Drummond, A., Nicholls, F., Rodrigo, A. &Solomon, W. (2002), “Estimating mutation parameters, population history, and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data”, Genetics 161(3), 1307–1320.Google Scholar

Dummit, D. & Foote, R. (2004), Abstract Algebra, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Duponchel, L. (2018 (. “Exploring hyperspectral imaging data sets with topological data analysis”, Analytica Chimica Acta 1000, 123–131.Google Scholar

Duvroye, L. (1987), A Course in Density Estimation, Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Duy, T., Hiraoka, Y. & Shirai, T. (2016), “Limit theorems for persistence diagrams”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08371.Google Scholar

Dydak, J. & Segal, J. (1978), Shape Theory: An Introduction, Springer.Google Scholar

Easley, D. & Kleinberg, J. (2011), Networks, Crowds, and Markets, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Edelsbrunner, H., Kirkpatrick, D. & Seidel, R. (1983), “On the shape of a set of points in the plane”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 29(4), 551–559.Google Scholar

Eilenberg, S. (1944), “Singular homology theory”, Annals of Mathematics 45(2), 407–447.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, J. (2018), Introduction to Natural Language Processing, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Erickson, J. & Whittlesey, K. (2005), “Greedy optimal homotopy and homology generators”, in Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM–SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1038–1046.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1741), “Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis”, 8, 128–140.Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1752a), “Elementa doctrinae solidorum”, Novi Comm. Acad. Sci. Imp. Petropol. (4), 109–140. (Opera Omnia Series 1, vol. 26, pp. 71–93.)Google Scholar

Euler, L. (1752b), “Demonstratio nonnullarum insignium proprietatum quibas solida hedris planis inclusa sunt praedita”, Novi Comm. Acad. Sci. Imp. Petropol. (4) 140–160. (Opera Omnia Series 1, vol. 26, pp. 94–108.)Google Scholar

Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M. & Stahl, D. (2011), Cluster Analysis, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Faúndez-Abans, M., Ormenoño, M. & de Oliveira-Abans, M. (1996), “Classification of planetary nebulae by cluster analysis and artificial neural networks”, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement 116, 395–402.Google Scholar

Federer, H. (1969), Geometric Measure Theory, Springer.Google Scholar

Feichtinger, H. & Strohmer, T. (1998), Gabor Analysis and Algorithms: Theory and Applications, Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Felsenstein, J. (2004), Inferring Phylogenies, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. (1944), “L’intégrale abstraite d’une fonction abstraite d’une variable abstraite et son application á la moyenne d’un élément aléatoire de natur quelconque”, Reviews of Science 82, 483–512.Google Scholar

Fréchet, M. (1948), “Les éléments aléatoires de nature quelconque dans un espace distancié”, Annals Institut Henri Poincaré 82, 215–310.Google Scholar

Freitag, E. & Kiehl, R. (1988), Étale Cohomology and the Weil Conjecture, Springer.Google Scholar

Gabriel, P. (1972), “Unzerlegbare Darstellungen I”, Manuscr. Math. (6), 71–103.Google Scholar

Ghrist, R. & Krishnan, S. (2017), ‘Positive Alexander duality for pursuit and evasion’, SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry 1(1), 308–327.Google Scholar

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. (2016), Deep Learning, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gott, J., Dickinson, M. & Melott, A. (1986), “The sponge-like topology of large-scale structure in the universe”, Astrophysical Journal 306, 341–357.Google Scholar

Greven, A., Pfaffelhuber, P. & Winter, A. (2009), “Convergence in distribution of random metric measure spaces”, Prob. Theo. Rel. Fields 145(1), 285–322.Google Scholar

Grosman, L., Smikt, O. & Smilansky, U. (2008), “On the application of 3-d scanning technology for the documentation and typology of lithic artifacts”, Journal of Archaeological Science 35(12), 3101–3110. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440308001398Google Scholar

Gross, P. & Kotiuga, P. (2004), Electromagnetic Theory and Computation – A Topological Approach, I Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications Vol. 48, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gusfield, D. (1997), Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, A., Gott, J. & Weinberg, D. (1986), “The topology of the large-scale structure of the universe”, Astrophysical Journal (309), 1–12.Google Scholar

Hartigan, J. (1975), Clustering Algorithms, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, R. (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Springer.Google Scholar

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. (2009), The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer.Google Scholar

Hatcher, A. (2002), Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. (2016), “Deep residual learning for image recognition”, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition pp. 770–778.Google Scholar

Hein, J. (2003), Discrete Mathematics, Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar

Hilton, P. (1988), “A brief, subjective history of homology and homotopy theory in this century”, Mathematics Magazine 60, 282–291.Google Scholar

Hiraoka, Y., Nakamura, T., Hirata, A., Escolar, E., Matsue, K. & Nishiura, Y. (2016), “Hierarchical structures of amorphous solids characterized by persistent homology”, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , Vol. 13, pp. 7035–7040.Google Scholar

Horst, A. M., Hill, A. P. & Gorman, K. B. (2020), “Palmerpenguins: Palmer Archipelago (Antarctica) penguin data.” R package version 0.1.0. https://allisonhorst.github.io/ palmerpenguins/Google Scholar

Hubel, D. (1988), Eye, Brain, and Vision, Holt, Henry, and Co.Google Scholar

Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. (1964), “Effects of monocular deprivation in kittens”, Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv for Experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie 248, 492–497. http://hubel.med.harvard.edu/papers/HubelWiesel1964NaunynSchmiedebergs ArchExpPatholPharmakol.pdf. (Accessed September 10, 2017)Google Scholar

Huchra, J., Jarrett, T., Skrutskie, M., Cutri, R., Schneider, S. & Macri, L. (2005), “The 2mass redshift survey and low galactic latitude large-scale structure”, in Nearby Large-Scale Structures and the Zone of Avoidance, Proceedings of the 2004 Conference in Cape Town, South Africa, Vol. 329 of ASP Conference Series.Google Scholar

Hurewicz, W. (1935), “Beiträge zur Topologie der Deformationen. i. Höherdimensionale Homotopiegruppen”, Proceedings of Koninklijke Academie Wetenschappen, Amsterdam 38, 112–119.Google Scholar

Kališnik, S. (2019), “Tropical coordinates on the space of persistence barcodes”, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 19(1), 101–129.Google Scholar

Kantz, H. & Schreiber, R. (2004), Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karcher, H. (1977), “Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing”, Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 30, 509–541.Google Scholar

Kendall, W. (1990), “Probability, convexity, and harmonic maps with small image: I. uniqueness and fine existence”, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (Third Series) 61, 371–406.Google Scholar

Khryashchev, D., Chu, J., Vejdemo-Johansson, M. & Ji, P. (2020), “A distributed approach to the evasion problem”, Algorithms 13(6), 149.Google Scholar

Kirchgässner, G. & Wolters, J. (2007), Introduction to Modern Time Series Analysis, Springer.Google Scholar

Klee, V. (1980), “On the complexity of d-dimensional voronoi diagrams”, Archiv der Mathematik 34, 75–80.Google Scholar

Kogan, J. (2007), Introduction to Clustering Large and High-Dimensional Data, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kovacev-Nikolic, V., Bubenik, P., Nikolić, D. & Heo, G. (2016), “Using persistent homology and dynamical distances to analyze protein binding”, Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 15(1), 19–38.Google Scholar

Lee, A., Pedersen, K. & Mumford, D. (2003), “The nonlinear statistics of high-contrast patches in natural images”, International Journal of Computer Vision 1/2/3(54), 83–103.Google Scholar

Lesnick, M., Rabadan, R. & Rosenbloom, D. (2019), “Quantifying genetic innovation: mathematical foundations for the topological study of reticulate evolution”, SIAM Journal of Applied Algebra and Geometry, 141–184.Google Scholar

Li, L. et al. (2015). “Identification of type 2 diabetes subgroups through topological analysis of patient similarity.” Science Translational Medicine 7Google Scholar

Lipsky, D., Skraba, P. & Vejdemo-Johansson, M. (2011), “A spectral sequence for parallelized persistence”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.1245.Google Scholar

Listing, J. (1848), Vorstudien zur Topologie, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Louie, A., Song, K. H., Hotson, A., Thomas Tate, A. & Schneider, D. S. (2016), “How many parameters does it take to describe disease tolerance?”, PLoS Biology 14(4), e1002435.Google Scholar

Love, E., Filippenko, B., Maroulas, V. & Carlsson, G. (2020), “Topological convolutional neural networks”, in Proceedings of the Neurrips Workshop on Topological Data Analysis and Beyond.Google Scholar

Lum, P., Singh, G., Carlsson, J., Lehman, A., Ishkhanov, T., Vejdemo-Johansson, M. et al. (2013), “Extracting insights from the shape of complex data using topology”, Scientific Reports 3, 1236.Google Scholar

Maclagan, D. & Sturmfels, B. (2015), Introduction to Tropical Geometry, American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

MacLane, S. (1998), Categories for the Working Mathematician, second edition, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Maleki, A., Shahram, M. & Carlsson, G. (2008), “Near optimal coder for image geometries”, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), San Diego, CA.Google Scholar

Manning, C. & Schütze, H. (1999), Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing, MIT Press.Google Scholar

Marzinotto, A., Stork, J.A., Dimarogonas, D. V. & Kragic, D. (2014), “Cooperative grasping through topological object representation”, in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE–RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots pp. 685–692.Google Scholar

Mileyko, Y., Mukherjee, S. & Harer, J. (2011), “Probability measures on the space of persistence diagrams”, Inverse Problems 27, 1–22.Google Scholar

Milnor, J. (1963), Morse Theory, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Milnor, J. & Stasheff, J. (1974), Characteristic Classes, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Monro, G. (1987), “The concept of multiset”, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik (33), 171–178.Google Scholar

Montgomery, D., Peck, E. & Vining, G. (2006), Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley Sons.Google Scholar

Munkres, J. (1975), Topology: a First Course, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Nelson, B. (2020), “Parameterized topological data analysis”, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Nguyen, D., Gao, K., Chen, J., Wang, R. & Wei, G. (2020a), “Potentially highly potent drugs for 2019-ncov”, bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.05.936013.Google Scholar

Nguyen, D., Gao, K., Wang, M. & Wei, G. (2020b), “Mathdl: mathematical deep learning for d3r grand challenge 4”, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 34, 131–147.Google Scholar

Nicolau, M., Levine, A. &Carlsson, G. (2011), “Topology based data analysis identifies a subgroup of breast cancers with a unique mutational profile and excellent survival”, Proceedings of the National Aacademy of Science 108(17), 7265–7270.Google Scholar

Niyogi, P., Smale, S. & Weinberger, S. (2008), “Finding the homology of submanifolds with high confidence from random samples”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 39, 419–441.Google Scholar

Offroy, M. & Duponchel, L. (2016), ‘Topological data analysis: a promising big data exploration tool in biology, analytical chemistry, and physical chemistry’, Analytica Chimica Acta 910, 1–11.Google Scholar

Otter, N., Porter, M. A., Tillmann, U., Grindrod, P. & Harrington, H. A. (2017), “A roadmap for the computation of persistent homology”, EPJ Data Science 6(1), 17.Google Scholar

Park, C., Pranav, P., Chingangram, P., van de Weygaert, R., Jones, B., Vegter, G. et al. (2013), “Betti numbers of gaussian fields”, Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society 46, 125–131.Google Scholar

Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O. et al. (2011), “Scikitlearn: machine learning in Python”, Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2825–2830.Google Scholar

Perea, J. & Carlsson, G. (2014), ‘A Klein bottle-based dictionary for texture representation’, International Journal of Computer Vision 107(1), 75–97.Google Scholar

Perea, J. & Harer, J. (2015), ‘Sliding windows and persistence: an application of topological methods to signal analysis’, Foundations of Computational Mathematics 15(3), 799–838.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. (1895), “Analysis situs”, Journal de l’École Polytechnique 1(2), 1–123.Google Scholar

Pokorny, F. T., Stork, J. A. & Kragic, D. (2013), “Grasping objects with holes: a topological approach”, in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1100–1107.Google Scholar

Rabadan, R. & Blumberg, A. (2019), Topological Data Analysis for Genomics and Evolution, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reaven, G. & Miller, R. (1979), ‘An attempt to define the nature of chemical diabetes using a multidimensional analysis’, Diabetologia 16(1), 17–24.Google Scholar

Reeb, G. (1946), “Sur les points singuliers d’une forme de pfaff completement integrable ou d’une fonction numerique”, Comptes Rendus des Seances de l’Academie des Sciences 222, 847–849.Google Scholar

Richardson, E. & Werman, M. (2014), “Efficient classification using the euler characteristic”, Pattern Recognition Letters 49, 99–106. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167865514002050Google Scholar

Riehl, E. (2017), Category Theory in Context, Courier Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Riemann, B. (1851), “Grundlagen für eine allgemeine Theorie der Functionen einer veränderlichen complexen Grösse”, Ph.D. thesis, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.Google Scholar

Robins, V. (1999), “Towards computing homology from finite approximations”, Topology Proceedings 24(1), 503–532.Google Scholar

Robinson, M. (2014), Topological Signal Processing, Springer.Google Scholar

Rolfsen, D. (1976), Knots and Links, Publish or Perish.Google Scholar

Saggar, M. et al. (2018). “Towards a new approach to reveal dynamical organization of the brain using topological data analysis.” Nature Communications 9.Google Scholar

Scott, D. (2015), Multivariate Density Estimation. Theory, Practice, and Visualization, JohnWiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Segal, G. (1968), “Classifying spaces and spectral sequences”, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 34, 105–112.Google Scholar

Singh, G., Mémoli, F. & Carlsson, G. (2007), “Topological methods for the analysis of high dimensional data sets and 3d object recognition”, in Proceedings of the Conferences on Point Based Graphics 2007.Google Scholar

Skryzalin, J. & Carlsson, G. (2017), “Numeric invariants from multidimensional persistence”, Journal of Applied and Computational Topology 1(1), 89–119.Google Scholar

Sneath, P. & Sokal, R. (1973), Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar

Sousbie, T. (2011), “The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure – I. Theory and implementation”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 414, 350–383.Google Scholar

Sousbie, T., Pichon, C. & Kawahara, H. (2011), “The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure – II. Illustrations”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 414, 384–403.Google Scholar

Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Doré, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J. et al. (2007), “Three year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Microwave Probe (WMAP) observations: implications for cosmology.” Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 170(2), 377.Google Scholar

Stork, J. A., Pokorny, F. T. & Kragic, D. (2013), “A topology-based object representation for clasping, latching and hooking”, in Proceedings of thea IEEE–RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 138–145.Google Scholar

Symons, M. (1981), “Clustering criteria and multivariate normal mixtures”, Biometrics 37(1) pp. 35–43.Google Scholar

Szabo, R. (2000), Equivariant Cohomology and Localization of Path Integrals, Springer.Google Scholar

Takens, F. (1981), “Detecting strange attractors in turbulence”, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898(1), 366–381.Google Scholar

Tellegen, B. (1952), “A general network theorem, with applications”, Philips Research Reports 7, 256–269.Google Scholar

Tenenbaum, J., de Silva, V. & Langford, J. (2000), “A global geometric framework for non-linear dimensionality reduction”, Science 290(5500), 2319–2323.Google Scholar

Torres, B., Oliveira, J., Tate, A., Rath, P., Cumnock, K. & Schneider, D. (2016), “Tracking resilience to infections by mapping disease space”, PLoS Biology 14.Google Scholar

Tralie, C., Saul, N. & Bar-On, R. (2018), “Ripser.py: a lean persistent homology library for python”, Journal of Open Source Software 3(29), 925. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00925Google Scholar

Turner, K., Mileyko, Y., Mukherjee, S. & Harer, J. (2014), “Fréchet means for distributions of persistence diagrams”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 52(1), 44–70.Google Scholar

van de Weygaert, R., Vegter, G., Edelsbrunner, H., Jones, B., Pranav, P., Park, C. et al. (2011), “Alpha, betti, and the megaparsec universe: on the topology of the cosmic web”, in Transactions on Computational Science XIV, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6970, pp. 60–101.Google Scholar

van Hateren, J. & van der Schaaf, A. (1990), “Statistical dependence between orientation filter outputs used in a human vision based image code”, Proceedings SPIE Visual Communication and Image Processing 1360, 909–922.Google Scholar

Vandermonde, A. (1771), “Remarques sur les problèmes de situation”, Memoires de l’Acadèmie Royale des Sciences, 566–574.Google Scholar

Vapnik, V. (1998), Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Vejdemo-Johansson, M. & Leshchenko, A. (2020), “Certified mapper: repeated testing for acyclicity and obstructions to the nerve lemma”, in Topological Data Analysis, Springer, pp. 491–515.Google Scholar

Vejdemo-Johansson, M., Pokorny, F., Skraba, P. & Kragic, D. (2015), “Cohomological learning of periodic motion”, Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing 26(1–2), 5–26.Google Scholar

Wahab, M. (2014), Essentials of Crystallography, Narosa Publishing House.Google Scholar

Weininger, D. (1988), “Smiles, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 28, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar

Xia, K., Zhao, Z. & Wei, G. (2015), “Multiresolution persistent homology for excessively large biomolecular datasets”, Journal of Chemical Physics 143(13), 134103.Google Scholar

Yanai, H., Takeuchi, K. & Takane, Y. (2011), Projection Matrices, Generalized Inverse Matrices, and Singular Value Decomposition, Springer.Google Scholar

Zomorodian, A. (2010), “The tidy set: a minimal simplicial set for computing homology of clique complexes”, Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry ACM, pp. 257–266.Google Scholar

Zomorodian, A. & Carlsson, G. (2005), “Computing persistent homology”, Discrete and Computational Geometry 33(2), 247–274.Google Scholar