Aalen, Odd Olai, Røysland, Kjetil, Gran, Jon Michael, Kouyos, Roger, and Lange, Tanja. 2016. Can we believe the DAGs? A comment on the relationship between causal DAGs and mechanisms. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(5), 2294–2314.Google Scholar

Ahn, Woo-Kyoung, Kalish, Charles W., Medin, Douglas L., and Gelman, Susan A. 1995. The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54(3), 299–352.Google Scholar

Albert, David Z. 2000. Time and Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, William P. 1998. Empiricism. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Taylor and Francis. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/empiricism/v-1.Google Scholar

Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(434), 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret, . 1971. Causality and Determination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arntzenius, Frank, and Greaves, Hilary. 2009. Time reversal in classical electromagnetism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(3), 557–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, W. Brian. 2009. The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Au, Yin Chung. 2016. Synthesising heterogeneity: trends of visuality in biological sciences circa 1970s - 2000s. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Bacciagaluppi, Guido. 2006. Probability, arrow of time and decoherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(2), 439–456.Google Scholar

Bang, Heejung, and Robins, James M. 2005. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics, 61(4), 962–973.Google Scholar

Bareinboim, Elias, and Pearl, Judea. 2013. A general algorithm for deciding transportability of experimental results. Journal of Causal Inference, 1(1), 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barndorff-Nielsen, Ole E., and Shephard, Neil. 2001. Non-Gaussian Ornstein– Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 167–241.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 2013. The Presocratic Philosophers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bechlivanidis, Christos, and Lagnado, David A. 2013. Does the “why” tell us the “when”? Psychological Science, 24(8), 1563–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechlivanidis, Christos, and Lagnado, David A. 2016. Time reordered: Causal perception guides the interpretation of temporal order. Cognition, 146, 58–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bechtel, William. 2006. Discovering Cell Mechanisms: The Creation of Modern Cell Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bechtel, William. 2015. Can mechanistic explanation be reconciled with scale-free constitution and dynamics? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 53, 84–93.Google Scholar

Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2005. Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(2), 421–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bechtel, William, Burnston, Daniel, Sheredos, Benjamin, and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2014. Representing time in scientific diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher Read, and Menzies, Peter (eds). 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beilock, Sian L., Gunderson, Elizabeth A., Ramirez, Gerardo, and Levine, Susan C. 2010. Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(5), 1860–1863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ben-Yami, Hanoch. 2007. The impossibility of backwards causation. The Philosophical Quarterly, 57(228), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Yami, Hanoch. 2010. Backwards causation still impossible. Analysis, 70(1), 89–92.Google Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth. 2006. Duverger’s law and the study of electoral systems. French Politics, 4(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth. 2007. Electoral laws as political consequences: Explaining the origins and change of electoral institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bequette, B. Wayne. 2010. Continuous glucose monitoring: Real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 4(2), 404–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Black, Max. 1956. Why cannot an effect precede its cause? Analysis, 16(3), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackwell, Kenneth. 1989. Portrait of a philosopher of science. In Savage, C. Wade, and Anderson, C. Anthony (eds), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 12. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 281–293.Google Scholar

Blais, André, and Carty, R. K. 1991. The psychological impact of electoral laws: Measuring Duverger’s elusive factor. British Journal of Political Science, 21(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohm, David (ed). 1951. Quantum Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bramley, Neil R. 2017. Constructing the world: Active causal learning in cognition. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Bramley, Neil R., Gerstenberg, Tobias, and Lagnado, David A. 2014. The order of things: Inferring causal structure from temporal patterns. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 236–242.Google Scholar

Bramley, Neil R., Lagnado, David A., and Speekenbrink, M. 2015. Conservative forgetful scholars: How people learn causal structure through interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 41(3), 708–731.Google ScholarPubMed

Bramley, Neil R., Mayrhofer, R., Gerstenberg, Tobias, and Lagnado, David A. 2017a. Causal learning from interventions and dynamics in continuous time. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Bramley, Neil R., Dayan, Peter, Griffiths, Thomas L., and Lagnado, David A. 2017b. Formalizing Neurath’s ship: Approximate algorithms for online causal learning. Psychological Review, 124(3), 301–338.Google Scholar

Bramley, Neil R., Gerstenberg, Tobias, Tenenbaum, Joshua B., and Gureckis, Todd M. 2018a. Intuitive experimentation in the physical world. Cognitive Psychology, 105, 9–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bramley, Neil R., Gerstenberg, Tobias, Mayrhofer, Ralf, and Lagnado, David A. 2018b. Time in causal structure learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 44(12), 1880–1910.Google Scholar

Bressler, Steven L., and Seth, Anil K. 2011. Wiener-Granger causality: A well established methodology. Neuroimage, 58(2), 323–329.Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome S., Jolly, Alison, and Sylva, Kathy (eds). 1976. Play: Its Role in Development and Evolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Buehner, Marc J., and Humphreys, Gruffydd R. 2009. Causal binding of actions to their effects. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1221–1228.Google Scholar

Buehner, Marc J., and May, Jon. 2002. Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction. Thinking & Reasoning, 8(4), 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buehner, Marc J., and May, Jon. 2003. Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: Effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(5), 865–890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buehner, Marc J., and May, Jon. 2004. Abolishing the effect of reinforcement delay on human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, 57(2), 179–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buehner, Marc J., and McGregor, Stuart. 2006. Temporal delays can facilitate causal attribution: Towards a general timeframe bias in causal induction. Thinking & Reasoning, 12(4), 353–378.Google Scholar

Burns, Patrick, and McCormack, Teresa. 2009. Temporal information and children’s and adults’ causal inferences. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(2), 167–196.Google Scholar

Caplan, Ben, and Matheson, Carl. 2004. Can a musical work be created? British Journal of Aesthetics, 44(2), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, Bob, Gelman, Andrew, Hoffman, Matthew D., Lee, Daniel, Goodrich, Ben, Betancourt, Michael, Brubaker, Marcus, Guo, Jiqiang, Li, Peter, and Riddell, Allen. 2017. Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Sean. 2010. From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. Causal laws and effective strategies. In: How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–42.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Cheng, Patricia W. 1997. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 367–405.Google Scholar

Cheng, Patricia W., and Novick, Laura R. 1990. A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 545.Google Scholar

Chickering, David Maxwell. 2002. Optimal structure identification with greedy search. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Nov), 507–554.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.Google Scholar

Cobelli, Claudio, Schiavon, Michele, Chiara, Dalla Man, Ananda, Basu, and Basu, Rita. 2016. Interstitial fluid glucose is not just a shifted-in-time but a distorted mirror of blood glucose: Insight from an in silico study. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 18(8), 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coenen, Anna, Rehder, Robert, and Gureckis, Todd M. 2015. Strategies to intervene on causal systems are adaptively selected. Cognitive Psychology, 79, 102–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coenen, Anna, Nelson, Jonathan D., and Gureckis, Todd M. 2017a. Asking the right questions about human inquiry. Retrieved from psyarxiv. com/h457v.Google Scholar

Coenen, Anna, Bramley, Neil R., Ruggeri, Azzurra, and Gureckis, Todd M. 2017b. Beliefs about sparsity affect causal experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Colyvan, Mark. 1998. Can the eleatic principle be justified? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 28(3), 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Contessa, Gabriele. 2007. Scientific representation, interpretation, and surrogative reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 48–68.Google Scholar

Cook, Roy T. 2012. Impure sets are not located: A Fregean argument. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1(3), 219–229.Google Scholar

Cowling, Sam. 2014. No simples, no gunk, no nothing. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 95(2), 246–260.Google Scholar

Cox, David Roxbee, and Isham, Valerie. 1980. Point processes. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol. 12. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Cramer, John G. 1980. Generalized absorber theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physical Review D, 22(2) 362–76.Google Scholar

Craver, Carl F., and Darden, Lindley. 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries Across the Life Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dash, Denver. 2003. Caveats for causal reasoning with equilibrium models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1967. Causal relations. The Journal of Philosophy, 64(21), 691–703.Google Scholar

Davis, James A. 1985. The Logic of Causal Order. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Davis, Zachary, Bramley, Neil R., and Rehder, Robert E. 2018a. Causal learning from continuous variables in continuous time. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Davis, Zachary, Bramley, Neil R., Gureckis, Todd M., and Rehder, Robert E. 2018b. A causal model approach to dynamic control. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Dayan, Peter. 1993. Improving generalization for temporal difference learning: The successor representation. Neural Computation, 5(4), 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Bal, Inge. 2017. Physical causal knowledge: A user’s manual. Revisiting the debate about causation in physics from a use-perspective. Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University.Google Scholar

de Souza, Daniel Câmara, and De Luca, Jayme. 2015. Solutions of the Wheeler-Feynman equations with discontinuous velocities. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25(1), 013102–11.Google Scholar

Dean, Thomas, and Kanazawa, Keiji. 1989. A model for reasoning about persistence and causation. Computational Intelligence, 5(2), 142–150.Google Scholar

Demirci, Kadir, Akgönül, Mehmet, and Akpinar, Abdullah. 2015. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 85–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deverett, Ben, and Kemp, Charles. 2012. Learning deterministic causal networks from observational data. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Di Blasi, Zelda, Harkness, Elaine, Ernst, Edzard, Georgiou, Amanda, and Kleijnen, Jos. 2001. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. The Lancet, 357(9258), 757–762.Google Scholar

Dowe, Phil. 1992. Wesley Salmon’s process theory of causality and the conserved quantity theory. Philosophy of Science, 59(2), 195–216.Google Scholar

Dowe, Phil. 2000. Physical Causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowe, Phil. 2008. Causal processes. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Ducheyne, Steffen. 2011. Newton on action at a distance and the cause of gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42(1), 154–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, A.E., and Flew, Antony. 1954. Symposium: Can an effect precede its cause? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 28, 27–62.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael. 1964. Bringing about the past. The Philosophical Review, 73(3), 338–359.Google Scholar

Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1951. Les partis politiques. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1959. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State (second English revised edition). London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar

Duverger, Maurice. 1961. Les partis politiques (quatrième edition). Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Eames, Elizabeth R. 1989. Cause in the later Russell. In: Savage, C. Wade, and Anderson, C. Anthony (eds), Minesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 12. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 264–280.Google Scholar

Earman, John. 1972. Notes on the causal theory of time. Synthese, 24(1–2), 74–86.Google Scholar

Earman, John. 1976. Causation: a matter of life and death. Journal of Philosophy, 73(1), 5–25.Google Scholar

Earman, John, Smeenk, Christopher, and Wüthrich, Christian. 2009. Do the laws of physics forbid the operation of time machines? Synthese, 169(1), 91–124.Google Scholar

Eells, Ellery. 1991. Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Effingham, Nikk. 2012. Impure sets may be located: a reply to Cook. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 1(4), 330–336.Google Scholar

Eichler, Michael. 2012. Causal inference in time series analysis. In: Berzuini, C., Dawid, P., and Bernardinelli, L., Causality: Statistical perspectives and applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 327–354.Google Scholar

Eichler, Michael, and Didelez, Vanessa. 2010. On Granger causality and the effect of interventions in time series. Lifetime Data Analysis, 16(1), 3–32.Google Scholar

Elhai, Jon D., Levine, Jason C., Dvorak, Robert D., and Hall, Brian J. 2016. Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elwert, Felix, and Winship, Christopher. 2014. Endogenous selection bias: the problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.Google Scholar

Engle, Robert F, and Granger, Clive W.J. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251–276.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter W. 2017. Quantum causal models, faithfulness, and eetrocausality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(3), 745–774.Google Scholar

Faye, Jan. 2015. Empiricism. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/peirce/.Google Scholar

Fedorov, Valerii Vadimovich. 1972. Theory of optimal experiments. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Feldbaum, A.A. 1960. Dual control theory I–IV. Avtomatika i Telemekhanika.Google Scholar

Fernbach, Philip M, and Sloman, Steven A. 2009. Causal learning with local computations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 35(3), 678.Google Scholar

Field, Hartry. 2003. Causation in a physical world. In: Loux, Michael J., and Zimmerman, Dean, W. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 435–460.Google Scholar

Fieser, James. 2018. David Hume (1711–1776). In: The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/hume/.Google Scholar

Fisher, Franklin M. 1970. A correspondence principle for simultaneous equation models. Econometrica, 38(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flew, Antony. 1956. Effects before their causes?—addenda and corrigenda. Analysis, 16(5), 104–110.Google Scholar

Flew, Antony. 1957. Causal disorder again. Analysis, 17(4), 81–86.Google Scholar

Forster, Malcolm, Raskutti, Garvesh, Stern, Reuben, and Weinberger, Naftali. 2017. The frugal inference of causal relations. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 69(3), 821–848.Google Scholar

Freedman, David A. 1997. From association to causation via regression. In: McKim, Vaughn R., and Turner, Stephen P. (eds), Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 113–61.Google Scholar

Freedman, David A. 2009. Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. Revised edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, William J. 1993. Memory for the Time of Past Events. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 44–66.Google Scholar

Frisch, Mathias. 2014. Causal Reasoning in Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friston, Karl J., Bastos, André M., Oswal, Ashwini, van Wijk, Bernadette, Richter, Craig, and Litvak, Vladimir. 2014. Granger causality revisited. NeuroImage, 101, 796–808.Google Scholar

Frosch, Caren A., McCormack, Teresa, Lagnado, David A, and Burns, Patrick. 2012. Are causal structure and intervention judgments inextricably linked? A developmental study. Cognitive Science, 36, 261–285.Google Scholar

Futch, Michael J. 2008. Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Time and Space. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Galavotti, Maria Carla. 2018. Wesley Salmon. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wesley-salmon/CausProc.Google Scholar

Gale, Richard M. 1965. Why a cause cannot be later than its effect. The Review of Metaphysics, 19(2), 209–234.Google Scholar

Gallistel, C. R., and Gibbon, John. 2000. Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107(2), 289.Google Scholar

Gandini, Sara, Botteri, Edoardo, Iodice, Simona, Boniol, Mathieu, Lowenfels, Albert B., Maisonneuve, Patrick, and Boyle, Peter. 2008. Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Cancer, 122(1), 155–164.Google Scholar

Garant, Dan, and Jensen, David. 2016. Evaluating causal models by comparing interventional distributions. CoRR. http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.04698Google Scholar

Garrett, Brian. 2014. Black on backwards causation. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 3(3), 230–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrett, Brian. 2015. On the epistemic bilking argument. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 4(3), 139–140.Google Scholar

Gastil, Raymond D. 1978. Freedom in the World: Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Boston, MA: Freedom House.Google Scholar

Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, Noah D., Lagnado, David A., and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2015. How, whether, why: Causal judgments as counterfactual contrasts. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 782–787.Google Scholar

Gerstenberg, Tobias, and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2017. Intuitive theories. Pages 515–548 of: Waldmann, Michael R. (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gerstenberg, Tobias, Bechlivanidis, Christos, and Lagnado, David A. 2013. Back on track: backtracking in counterfactual reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 35^th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Getoor, Lise, and Taskar, Ben. 2007. Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar

Getoor, Lise, Friedman, Nir, Koller, Daphne, and Taskar, Benjamin. 2001. Learning Probabilistic Models of Relational Structure. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-’01), pp. 170–177.Google Scholar

Ghahramani, Zoubin. 1998. Learning dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Giles, C. Lee, and Gori, Marco (eds), Adaptive Processing of Sequences and Data Structures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 168–197.Google Scholar

Giere, Ronald. 1997. Understanding Scientific Reasoning (4th edition). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar

Gijsbers, Victor. On the presuppositions of (nearly) all current theories of causation. Under Review.Google Scholar

Glennan, Stuart. 1996a. Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis, 44(1), 49–71.Google Scholar

Glennan, Stuart. 1996b. Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation. Erkenntnis, 44(1), 49–71.Google Scholar

Glennan, Stuart. 2009. Productivity, relevance and natural selection. Biology & Philosophy, 24(3), 325–339.Google Scholar

Glennan, Stuart. 2017. The New Mechanical Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Glymour, Clark. 1999. Rabbit hunting. Synthese, 121(1), 55–78.Google Scholar

Glymour, Clark. 2001. The Mind’s Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Glymour, Clark, Scheines, Richard, Spirtes, Peter, and Kelley, Kevin. 1987. Discovering Causal Structure: Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy of Science, and Statistical Modeling. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Glymour, Clark, Scheines, Richard, Spirtes, Peter, and Meek, Christopher. 1994. “Regression and Causation”. Tech. rept. CMU-PHIL-60. Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Glymour, Clark, and Eberhardt, Frederick. 2016. Hans Reichenbach. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reichenbach/DirTim195.Google Scholar

Goodman, Noah, Mansinghka, Vikash, Roy, Daniel M., Bonawitz, Keith, and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2012. Church: a language for generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.3255.Google Scholar

Gopnik, Alison, Glymour, Clark, Sobel, David M., Schulz, Laura E., Kushnir, Tamar, and Danks, David. 2004. A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111(1), 3.Google Scholar

Gopnik, Alison, and Schulz, Laura E. 2007. Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gopnik, Alison, and Sobel, David M. 2000. Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Development, 71(5), 1205–1222.Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew D., Henzinger, Thomas A., Nori, Aditya V., and Rajamani, Sriram K. 2014. Probabilistic programming. In: Proceedings of the on Future of Software Engineering. ACM, pp. 167–181.Google Scholar

Granger, Clive W.J. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.Google Scholar

Granger, Clive W.J. 1980. Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329–352.Google Scholar

Granger, Clive W.J. 2004. Time series analysis, cointegration, and applications. American Economic Review, 421–425.Google Scholar

Green, Sara, and Batterman, Robert. 2017. Biology meets physics: reductionism and multi-scale modeling of morphogenesis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 61, 20–34.Google Scholar

Greenwald, Anthony G. 1976. Within-subjects designs: to use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin, 83(2), 314–320.Google Scholar

Greville, W. James, and Buehner, Marc J. 2007. The influence of temporal distributions on causal induction from tabular data. Memory & Cognition, 35(3), 444–453.Google Scholar

Greville, W. James, and Buehner, Marc J. 2010. Temporal predictability facilitates causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 756–771.Google Scholar

Greville, W. James, and Buehner, Marc J. 2016. Temporal predictability enhances judgements of causality in elemental causal induction from both observation and intervention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(4), 678–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greville, W. James, Cassar, Adam A., Johansen, Mark K., and Buehner, Marc J. 2013. Structural awareness mitigates the effect of delay in human causal learning. Memory & Cognition, 41(6), 1–13.Google Scholar

Grice, G Robert. 1948. The relation of secondary reinforcement to delayed reward in visual discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(1), 1.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas L., Lucas, Christopher G., Williams, Joseph, and Kalish, Michael L. 2009. Modeling human function learning with Gaussian processes. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 553–560.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas L. 2005. Causes, coincidences, and theories. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas L., and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2005. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51(4), 334–384.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Thomas L., and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2009. Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116(4), 661–716.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Adolf. 1963. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Adolf. 1968. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Guez, Arthur. 2015. Sample-based Search Methods for Bayes-Adaptive Planning. Ph.D. thesis, University College London.Google Scholar

Haggard, Patrick, Clark, Sam, and Kalogeras, Jeri. 2002. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4), 382–385.Google Scholar

Hagmayer, York, and Waldmann, Michael R. 2002. How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments. Memory & Cognition, 30(7), 1128–1137.Google Scholar

Hahn, Jinyong, Todd, Petra, and Klaauw, Van der, Wilbert, . 2001. Identification and estimation of treatment effects with a regression-discontinuity design. Econometrica, 69(1), 201–209.Google Scholar

Hall, Ned. 2004. Two Concepts of Causation. In: Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, Laurie (eds), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, Joseph Y. 2016. Actual Causality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hausman, Daniel M. 1998. Causal Asymmetries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hausman, Daniel M., and Woodward, James. 1999. Independence, invariance and the causal Markov condition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50(4), 521–583.Google Scholar

Hill, Austin Bradford. 1965. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58(5), 295–300.Google Scholar

Hinkle, Dennis E., Wiersma, William, and Jurs, Stephen G. 1988. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edition). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Christopher. 2001. The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs. The Journal of Philosophy, 98(6), 273–299.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Christopher. 2012. Events and times: a case study in means–ends metaphysics. Philosophical studies, 160(1), 79–96.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Christopher. 2016. Probabilistic causation. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, winter 2016 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Hoefer, Carl. 2009. Causation in spacetime theories. In: Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher Read, and Menzies, Peter (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 687–706.Google Scholar

Holland, Paul W. 1986. Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.Google Scholar

Holyoak, Keith J., and Cheng, Patricia W. 2011. Causal learning and inference as a rational process: the new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 135–63.Google Scholar

Hoover, Kevin D. 2001. Causality in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoover, Kevin D. 2003. Nonstationary time series, cointegration, and the principle of the common cause. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(4), 527–551.Google Scholar

Hoover, Kevin D. 2015. The ontological status of shocks and trends in macroeconomics. Synthese, 192(11), 3509–3532.Google Scholar

Huemer, Michael, and Kovitz, Ben. 2003. Causation as simultaneous and continuous. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(213), 556–565.Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1739/1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch.Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1740/1978. An Abstract of A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge & P. H. Nidditch.Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Beauchamp, Ed. T. 2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ilhan, Zehra Esra, DiBaise, John K., Isern, Nancy G., Hoyt, David W., Marcus, Andrew K., Kang, Dae-Wook, Crowell, Michael D., Rittmann, Bruce E., and Krajmalnik-Brown, Rosa. 2017. Distinctive microbiomes and metabolites linked with weight loss after gastric bypass, but not gastric banding. The ISME Journal, 11(9), 2047–2058.Google Scholar

Illari, Phyllis, and Russo, Federica. 2014. Causality: Philosophical Theory Meets Scientific Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Illari, Phyllis McKay. 2011. Mechanistic evidence: disambiguating the Russo-Williamson thesis. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 25(2), 139–157.Google Scholar

Illari, Phyllis McKay, and Williamson, Jon. 2012. What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(1), 119–135.Google Scholar

Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765–789.Google Scholar

Ismael, Jenann. 2016. How do causes depend on us? Synthese, 193(1), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iwasaki, Yumi, and Simon, Herbert A. 1994. Causality and model abstraction. Artificial intelligence, 67(1), 143–194.Google Scholar

James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. Dover (2000 reprint).Google Scholar

Janiak, Andrew. 2013. Three concepts of causation in Newton. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 44(3), 396–407.Google Scholar

Janiak, Andrew, and Schliesser, Eric (eds). 2012. Interpreting Newton: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, David D, and Cohen, Paul R. 2000. Multiple comparisons in induction algorithms. Machine Learning, 38(3), 309–338.Google Scholar

Jordan, Michael I, and Rumelhart, David E. 1992. Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 307–354.Google Scholar

Jung, Carl. 1973. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1781/1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karin, Michael. 1999. How NF-κB is activated: the role of the IκB kinase (IKK) complex. Oncogene, 18, 6867–6874.Google Scholar

Kim, Nancy S, and Ahn, Woo-Kyoung. 2002. Clinical psychologists’ theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(4), 451.Google Scholar

Kirby, James B. 2002. The influence of parental separation on smoking initiation in adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(1), 56–71.Google Scholar

Klenske, Edgar D., and Hennig, Philipp. 2016. Dual control for approximate bayesian reinforcement learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(127), 1–30.Google Scholar

Kline, Rex B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd edn. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Koller, Daphne, and Friedman, Nir. 2009. Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar

Korb, Kevin B., Hope, Lucas R., Nicholson, Ann E., and Axnick, Karl. 2004. Varieties of causal intervention. In: Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 322–331.Google Scholar

Korman, Daniel Z. 2014. The Vagueness Argument against Abstract Artifacts. Philosophical Studies, 167(1), 57–71.Google Scholar

Kreuz, Sebastian, Siegmund, Daniela, Rumpf, Jost-Julian, Samel, Dierk, Leverkus, Martin, Janssen, Ottmar, Häcker, Georg, Dittrich-Breiholz, Oliver, Kracht, Michael, Scheurich, Peter, and Wajant, Harald. 2004. NFκB activation by Fas is mediated through FADD, caspase-8, and RIP and is inhibited by FLIP. The Journal of Cell Biology, 166(3), 369–380.Google Scholar

Kutach, Douglas. 2014. Causation. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar

Lacey, Hugh M. 1968. The causal theory of time: a critique of Grünbaum’s version. Philosophy of Science, 35(4), 332–354.Google Scholar

Lacko, Vladimír. 2012. Planning of experiments for a nonautonomous Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, 51(1), 101–113.Google Scholar

Lagnado, David A, and Sloman, Steven A. 2002. Learning causal structure. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lagnado, David A, and Sloman, Steven A. 2004. The advantage of timely intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30, 856–876.Google Scholar

Lagnado, David A, and Sloman, Steven A. 2006. Time as a guide to cause. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 451–460.Google Scholar

Lagnado, David A, and Speekenbrink, Maarten. 2010. The influence of delays in real-time causal learning. The Open Psychology Journal, 3(2), 184–195.Google Scholar

Lagnado, David A, Gerstenberg, Tobias, and Zultan, Ro’i. 2013. Causal responsibility and counterfactuals. Cognitive Science, 37(6), 1036–1073.Google Scholar

Lake, Brenden M, Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, and Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2015. Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266), 1332–1338.Google Scholar

Lauritzen, Steffen L, and Richardson, Thomas S. 2002. Chain graph models and their causal interpretations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 64(3), 321–348.Google Scholar

Lee, Sanghack, and Honavar, Vasant. 2016a. A characterization of Markov equivalence classes of relational causal models under path semantics. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-16).Google Scholar

Lee, Sanghack, and Honavar, Vasant. 2016b. On learning causal models from relational data. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16), pp. 3263–3270.Google Scholar

Leuridan, Bert. 2012. Three problems for the mutual manipulability account of constitutive relevance in mechanisms. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(2), 399–427.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1972. Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 50(3), 249–258.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973a. Causation. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(17), 556–567.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1980. A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In: Jeffrey, Richard C. (ed), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Volume II. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 263–293.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1979. Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. Noûs, 13(4), 455–476.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1986. A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–132.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973b. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Little, Daniel. 2012. Explanatory autonomy and Coleman’s boat. THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 27(2), 137–151.Google Scholar

Lucas, Christopher G, and Kemp, Charles. 2015. An improved probabilistic account of counterfactual reasoning. Psychological Review, 122(4), 700.Google Scholar

McCormack, Teresa, Bramley, Neil R., Frosch, Caren A., Patrick, Fiona, and Lagnado, David A. 2016. Children’s use of interventions to learn causal structure. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 1–22.Google Scholar

Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F. 2000. Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Mackie, John L. 1974/1980. The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Maier, Marc. 2014. Causal Discovery for Relational Domains: Representation, Reasoning, and Learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar

Maier, Marc, Marazopoulou, Katerina, Arbour, David, and Jensen, David. 2013. A sound and complete algorithm for learning causal models from relational data. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, pp. 371–380.Google Scholar

Malthus, Thomas Robert. 1888. An Essay on the Principle of Population: or, A View of its Past and Present Effects on Human Happiness. London: Reeves & Turner.Google Scholar

Mandler, George, and Shebo, Billie J. 1982. Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(1), 1.Google Scholar

Mansinghka, Vikash, Selsam, Daniel, and Perov, Yura. 2014. Venture: a higher-order probabilistic programming platform with programmable inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.0099.Google Scholar

Marazopoulou, Katerina, Maier, Marc, and Jensen, David. 2015. Learning the structure of causal models with relational and temporal dependence. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-15), pp. 66–75.Google Scholar

Marom, Shimon. 2010. Neural timescales or lack thereof. Progress in Neurobiology, 90(1), 16–28.Google Scholar

Maudlin, Tim. 2007. The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. 1961. Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134(3489), 1501–1506.Google Scholar

Mayrhofer, Ralf, and Waldmann, Michael R. 2016. Sufficiency and necessity assumptions in causal structure induction. Cognitive Science, 40(8), 2137–2150.Google Scholar

Mehlberg, Henry. 1980. Time, Causality and the Quantum Theory. Volume 1: Essay on the Causal Theory of Time. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. 1991. Causation and the direction of time. Erkenntnis, 35(1), 191–203.Google Scholar

Menzies, Peter. 1996. Probabilistic causation and the pre-emption problem. Mind, 105(417), 85–117.Google Scholar

Menzies, Peter. 2014. Counterfactual theories of causation. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Menzies, Peter, and Price, Huw. 1993. Causation as a secondary quality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(2), 187–203.Google Scholar

Michotte, Albert. 1946. La Perception de la Causalité. Louvain: Editions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar

Miele, Christopher. 2016. Pushing that crosswalk button may make you feel better, but …. New York Times, October 27.Google Scholar

Mill, John S. 1843/1911. A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E. 1999. Temporal order and causal inference. Political Analysis, 8(2), 119–146.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Sandra D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Momennejad, Ida, Russek, Evan M., Cheong, Jin H., Botvinick, Matthew M., Daw, N. D., and Gershman, Samuel J. 2017. The successor representation in human reinforcement learning. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(9), 680–692.Google Scholar

Morris, William Edward, and Brown, Charlotte R. 2017. David Hume. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2017 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen, and Anjum, Rani Lill. 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Kevin. 2002. Dynamic Bayesian Networks: Representation, Inference and Learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkley.Google Scholar

Nikolic, Milena, and Lagnado, David A. 2015. There aren’t plenty more fish in the sea: a causal network approach. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 564–582.Google Scholar

Nodelman, Uri, Shelton, Christian R., and Koller, Daphne. 2002. Continuous time Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 378–387.Google Scholar

North, Jill. 2008. Two views on time reversal. Philosophy of Science, 75(2), 201–223.Google Scholar

Oates, Tim, and Jensen, David. 1999. Toward a theoretical understanding of why and when decision tree pruning algorithms fail. In: Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence and the eleventh Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference innovative applications of artificial intelligence, pp. 372–378.Google Scholar

Odum, Eugene P. 1959. Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders company.Google Scholar

Pacer, Michael D, and Griffiths, Thomas L. 2011. A rational model of causal induction with continuous causes. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2384–2392.Google Scholar

Pacer, Michael D, and Griffiths, Thomas L. 2015. Upsetting the contingency table: causal induction over sequences of point events. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Paek, Andrew L., Liu, Julia C., Loewer, Alexander, Forrester, William C., and Lahav, Galit. 2016. Cell-to-Cell Variation in p53 Dynamics Leads to Fractional Killing. Cell, 165(3), 631–642.Google Scholar

Park, Gunwoong, and Raskutti, Garvesh. 2016. Identifiability assumptions and algorithm for directed graphical models with feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.04418.Google Scholar

Paudel, Jayash, and Crago, Christine L. 2017. Fertilizer Subsidy and Agricultural Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Nepal. Tech. rept. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.Google Scholar

Paul, L. A., and Hall, Ned. 2013. Cases that Threaten Transitivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2009. Causal inference in statistics: an overview. Statistics Surveys, 3, 96–146.Google Scholar

Pearl, Judea. 2014. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, Avi. 2016. Practical Probabilistic Programming. Shelter Island, NY: Manning Publications Co.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, Brad E, and Foster, David J. 2013. Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature, 497(7447), 74–79.Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean, and Valsiner, Jaan. 1930. The Child’s Conception of Physical Causality. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Price, Huw. 1991. Agency and probabilistic causality. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 42(2), 157–176.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 1992. Agency and causal asymmetry. Mind, 101(403), 501–520.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 1996. Time’s Arrow & Archimedes’ Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 2005. Causal Perspectivalism. In: Price, Huw, and Corry, Richard (eds), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 250–292.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 2011. Naturalism Without Mirrors. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 2012a. Causation, chance, and the rational significance of supernatural evidence. Philosophical Review, 121(4), 483–538.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 2012b. Does time-symmetry imply retrocausality? How the quantum world says “maybe”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43(2), 75–83.Google Scholar

Price, Huw. 2017. Causation, intervention and agency—Woodward on Menzies and Price. In: Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher, and Menzies, Peter (eds), Making a Difference: Essays on the Philosophy of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis. 2002. Causation and Explanation. Chesham: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar

Raiffa, Howard. 1974. Applied Statistical Decision Theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rehder, Robert E. 2003. A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 1141.Google Scholar

Rehder, Robert E. 2017. Reasoning with causal cycles. Cognitive Science, 41.Google Scholar

Rehder, Robert E., and Burnett, Russell C. 2005. Feature inference and the causal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50(3), 264–314.Google Scholar

Rehder, Robert E., and Waldmann, Michael R. 2017. Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 245–260.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans. 1928. Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans. 1956. The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press. Reprint, Dover Publications, 2000.Google Scholar

Reichenbach, Hans. 1956/1971. The Direction of Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Reiss, Ira L. 1967. The Social Context of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Reiss, Julian. 2007. Time series, nonsense correlations and the principle of the common cause. In Russo, Federica and Williamson, Jon, (eds.), Causality and Probability in the Sciences. Texts in Philosophy (5). London: College Publications, pp. 179–196.Google Scholar

Rescorla, Robert A, and Wagner, Allan R. 1972, . A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black, Abraham H, and Prokasy, William Frederick (eds), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 64–99.Google Scholar

Richardson, Thomas. 1996. A discovery algorithm for directed cyclic graphs. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., pp. 454–461.Google Scholar

Rips, Lance J. 2010. Two causal theories of counterfactual conditionals. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 175–221.Google Scholar

Rips, Lance J., and Edwards, Brian J. 2013. Inference and explanation in counterfactual reasoning. Cognitive Science, 37(6), 1107–1135.Google Scholar

Roache, Rebecca. 2009. Bilking the Bilking Argument. Analysis, 69(4), 605–611.Google Scholar

Romero, Felipe. 2015. Why there isn’t inter-level causation in mechanisms. Synthese, 192(11), 3731–3755.Google Scholar

Rosen, Gideon. 2014. Abstract Objects. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2014 edn.Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, Paul R, and Rubin, Donald B. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.Google Scholar

Ross, Lauren N. 2018. Causal selection and the pathway concept. Philosophy of Science, 85(4), 551–572.Google Scholar

Rothe, Anselm, Deverett, Ben, and Kemp, Charles. Successful structure learning from observational data. Cognition, 179, 266–297.Google Scholar

Rottman, Benjamin M. 2016. Searching for the best cause: roles of mechanism beliefs, autocorrelation, and exploitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(8), 1233–1256.Google Scholar

Rottman, Benjamin M., and Keil, Frank C. 2012. Causal structure learning over time: observations and interventions. Cognitive Psychology, 64(1), 93–125.Google Scholar

Rottman, Benjamin M., Kominsky, Jonathan F., and Keil, Frank C. 2014. Children use temporal cues to learn causal directionality. Cognitive Science, 38(3), 489–513.Google Scholar

Rubin, Donald B. 2005. Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 322–331.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1913. On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. 1990. Scientific explanation: causation and unification. Critica, 22(66), 3–23.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. 1994. Causality without counterfactuals. Philosophy of Science, 61(2), 297–312.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. 1997. Causality and explanation: a reply to two critiques. Philosophy of Science, 64(3), 461–477.Google Scholar

Saraiva, Nuno, Prole, David L., Carrara, Guia, Johnson, Benjamin F., Taylor, Colin W., Parsons, Maddy, and Smith, Geoffrey L. 2013. hGAAP promotes cell adhesion and migration via the stimulation of store-operated Ca²⁺ entry and calpain 2. The Journal of Cell Biology, 202(4), 699–713.Google Scholar

Schlottmann, Anne. 1999. Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: how children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 303–317.Google Scholar

Schulz, Eric, Klenske, Edgar D, Bramley, Neil R, and Speekenbrink, Maarten. 2017b. Strategic exploration in human adaptive control. In: Proceedings of the 39^th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Schulz, Eric, Tenenbaum, Joshua B, Duvenaud, David, Speekenbrink, Maarten, and Gershman, Samuel J. 2017a. Compositional inductive biases in function learning. Cognitive Psychology, 99, 44–79.Google Scholar

Schulz, Laura E. 2001. Do-calculus? Adults and preschoolers infer causal structure from patterns of outcomes following interventions. In: Second Biennial Meeting of the Cognitive Development Society.Google Scholar

Scriven, Michael. 1956. Randomness and the causal order. Analysis, 17(1), 5–9.Google Scholar

Shadish, William, Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T. 2001. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Shanks, David R, and Dickinson, Anthony. 1987. Associative accounts of causality judgment. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 229–261.Google Scholar

Shanks, David R., Pearson, Susan M., and Dickinson, Anthony. 1989. Temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality by human subjects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 B(2), 139–159.Google Scholar

Shannon, Claude E. 1951. Prediction and entropy of printed English. The Bell System Technical Journal, 30, 50–64.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert. 1977. Causal ordering and identifiability. In: Hood, W., and Koopmans, T. (eds), Studies in Econometric Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 49–74.Google Scholar

Simons, Leslie Gordon, Burt, Callie Harbin, and Peterson, F. Ryan. 2009. The effect of religion on risky sexual behavior among college students. Deviant Behavior, 30(5), 467–485.Google Scholar

Sloman, Steven A. 2005. Causal Models: How People Think about the World and its Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sloman, Steven A., and Lagnado, David A. 2005. Do we “do”? Cognitive Science, 29(1), 5–39.Google Scholar

Sloman, Steven A., Love, Bradley C., and Ahn, Woo-Kyoung. 1998. Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 189–228.Google Scholar

Smart, John J. C. 1969. Causal theories of time. The Monist, 53(3), 385–395.Google Scholar

Smeenk, Chris, and Wüthrich, Christian. 2011. Time travel and time machines. In: Callender, Craig (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, online edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Nicholas J. J. 2018. Time Travel. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, summer 2018 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Sobel, David M, and Kushnir, Tamar. 2006. The importance of decision making in causal learning from interventions. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 411–419.Google Scholar

Sobel, David M, Tenenbaum, Joshua B, and Gopnik, Alison. 2004. Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 303–333.Google Scholar

Sobel, Michael E. 1990. Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 55(3), 495–515.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. 2001. Venetian sea levels, British bread prices, and the principle of the common cause. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 331–346.Google Scholar

Soo, Kevin W, and Rottman, Benjamin M. 2014. Learning causal direction from transitions with continuous and noisy variables. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, vol. 36.Google Scholar

Soo, Kevin W, and Rottman, Benjamin M. 2018. Causal strength induction from time series data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(4), 485.Google Scholar

Spirtes, Peter, and Scheines, Richard. 1997. Reply to Freedman. In: McKim, Vaughn R., and Turner, Stephen P. (eds), Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 163–182.Google Scholar

Spirtes, Peter, Glymour, Clarke, and Scheines, Richard. 2000. Causation, Prediction, and Search. Second edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First published 1993.Google Scholar

Steel, Daniel. 2004. Social mechanisms and causal inference. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(1), 55–78.Google Scholar

Steel, Daniel. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stephan, Simon, Mayrhofer, Ralf, and Waldmann, Michael R. 2018, . Assessing singular causation: the role of causal latencies. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Steyvers, Mark, Lee, Michael D, and Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan. 2009. A Bayesian analysis of human decision-making on bandit problems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(3), 168–179.Google Scholar

Steyvers, Mark, Tenenbaum, Joshua B, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, and Blum, Ben. 2003. Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions. Cognitive Science, 27(3), 453–489.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter. 1966. The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Strotz, Robert H., and Wold, H. O. A. 1960. Recursive vs. nonrecursive systems: an attempt at synthesis. Econometrica, 28(2), 417–427.Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick. 1970. A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Swoyer, Chris. 1991. Structural representation and surrogative reasoning. Synthese, 87(3), 449–508.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles Lewis, and Jodice, David A. 1983. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators III. Volume 2: Political Protest and Government Change. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Timberlake, Michael, and Williams, Kirk R. 1984. Dependence, political exclusion, and government repression: some cross-national evidence. American Sociological Review, 49(1), 141–146.Google Scholar

Tolpin, David, van de Meent, Jan-Willem, and Wood, Frank. 2015. Probabilistic programming in Anglican. In: Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 308–311.Google Scholar

Tooley, Michael. 1997. Time, Tense and Causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Tsamardinos, Ioannis, Brown, Laura E, and Aliferis, Constantin F. 2006. The max-min hill-climbing Bayesian network structure learning algorithm. Machine Learning, 65(1), 31–78.Google Scholar

Tulving, Endel. 1972. Episodic and semantic memory. In: Tulving, Endel, and Donaldson, Wayne (eds), Organization of memory. Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 381–403.Google Scholar

Uffink, Jos. 2017. Boltzmann’s work in statistical physics. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, spring 2017 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Uhlenbeck, George E, and Ornstein, Leonard S. 1930. On the theory of the Brownian motion. Physical Review, 36(5), 823.Google Scholar

van de Meent, Jan-Willem, Paige, Brooks, Yang, Hongseok, and Wood, Frank. 2018. An introduction to probabilistic programming. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10756.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas. 1970. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas. 1972. Earman on the causal theory of time. Synthese, 24(1–2): 87–95.Google Scholar

VanderWeele, Tyler J. 2009. Mediation and mechanism. European Journal of Epidemiology, 24(5), 217–224.Google Scholar

Vernon, David and Lowe, Robert and Thill, Serge and Ziemke, Tom. 2015. Embodied cognition and circular causality: on the role of constitutive autonomy in the reciprocal coupling of perception and action. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1660.Google Scholar

Verschuur, Gerrit L. 1996. Hidden Attraction: The History and Mystery of Magnetism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Vul, Ed, Alvarez, George, Tenenbaum, Joshua B., and Black, Michael J. 2009. Explaining human multiple object tracking as resource-constrained approximate inference in a dynamic probabilistic model. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 1955–1963.Google Scholar

Waldmann, Michael R. 2000. Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 53–76.Google Scholar

Waldmann, Michael R., and Holyoak, Keith J. 1992. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(2), 222–236.Google Scholar

Waldmann, Michael R, and Martignon, Laura. 1998. A Bayesian network model of causal learning. In: Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1102–1107.Google Scholar

Waldmann, Michael R., and Hagmayer, York. 2005. Seeing versus doing: two modes of accessing causal knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 216–227.Google Scholar

Wallace, David. 2012. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wheeler, John Archibald, and Feynman, Richard Phillips. 1949. Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21(3), 425.Google Scholar

White, Peter A. 2006. How well is causal structure inferred from cooccurrence information? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 454–480.Google Scholar

White, Peter A. 2008. Beliefs about interactions between factors in the natural environment: a causal network study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(4), 559–572.Google Scholar

Wiseman, Howard M. 2014. The two Bell?s Theorems of John Bell. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 47(42), 424001.Google Scholar

Wolfe, John B. 1921. The effect of delayed reward upon learning in the white rat. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2009. Agency and Interventionist Theories. In: Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher, and Menzies, Peter (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 234–262.Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2016. Causation and manipulability. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-mani/AgenTheo.Google Scholar

Woodward, James. 2017. Interventionism and the missing metaphysics. In: Slater, Matthew, and Yudell, Zanja (eds), Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–228.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2015, . Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Boston, MA : Cengage Learning Nelson Education.Google Scholar

Young, Michael E, and Nguyen, Nam. 2009. The problem of delayed causation in a video game: constant, varied, and filled delays. Learning and Motivation, 40(3), 298–312.Google Scholar

Zhang, Jiji. 2012. A comparison of three Occam’s razors for Markovian causal models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64(2), 423–448.Google Scholar

Zwart, P. J. 1967. Causaliteit. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar