Book contents
- Theatrical Reenactment in Pindar and Aeschylus
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Theatrical Reenactment in Pindar and Aeschylus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Voices of Others Embedded Speech in Pindar and Aeschylus
- Chapter 2 Anachronistic Harmonies Agamemnon parodos, Pythian 4
- Chapter 3 Vocal Tools Pythian 12, Olympian 13, Seven Against Thebes
- Chapter 4 Somatic Semblances Choephoroi, Olympian 8, Pythian 2
- Chapter 5 Locating the Revenant Pythian 8, Persians
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2019
Book contents
- Theatrical Reenactment in Pindar and Aeschylus
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Theatrical Reenactment in Pindar and Aeschylus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Voices of Others Embedded Speech in Pindar and Aeschylus
- Chapter 2 Anachronistic Harmonies Agamemnon parodos, Pythian 4
- Chapter 3 Vocal Tools Pythian 12, Olympian 13, Seven Against Thebes
- Chapter 4 Somatic Semblances Choephoroi, Olympian 8, Pythian 2
- Chapter 5 Locating the Revenant Pythian 8, Persians
- Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Theatrical Reenactment in Pindar and Aeschylus , pp. 273 - 298Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Adorjáni, Z. 2014. Pindars sechste olympische Siegesode: Text, Einleitung und Kommentar, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Adrados, F.R. 1989. “La divination dans les choeurs de l’Agamemnon d’Eschyle,” Revue des Etudes Grecques 102: 295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguirre, M. 2006. “Fantasmas tragicos: Algunas observaciones sobre su papel, aparicion en escena e iconografia,” Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 16: 107–20Google Scholar
Aguirre, M. 2009. “Some Ghostly Appearances in Greece: Literary and Artistic Sources,” Gerión 27: 179–89Google Scholar
Allan, W. 2004. “Religious Syncretism: The New Gods of Greek Tragedy,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102: 113–55Google Scholar
Allen-Hornblower, E. 2016. From Agent to Spectator: Witnessing the Aftermath in Ancient Greek Epic and Tragedy, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Andrisano, A. 2002. “La definizione dello spazio scenico nei Sette,” in Aloni, A., Berardi, E., Besso, G., et al. (eds), I Sette a Tebe: Dal mito alla letteratura (Bologna), 125–44Google Scholar
Andujar, R., Coward, T., and Hadjimichael, T. (eds) 2018. Paths of Song: The Lyric Dimension of Tragedy, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 1990. “Mantic Vision and Diction in Pindar’s Victory Odes,” Diss. Providence, RIGoogle Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 1993–4. “Choral and Prophetic Discourse in the First Stasimon of the Agamemnon,” Classical Journal 89: 149–62Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2003. “Transformations of Colonial Disruption into Narrative Continuity in Pindar’s Epinician Odes,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 101: 93–128Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2004. “Deixis, Performance, and Poetics in Pindar’s First Olympian Ode,” Arethusa 37: 317–41Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2009a. “Apollo and his Oracles in Pindar’s Epinicians: Poetic Representations, Politics, and Ideology,” in Athanassaki, L., Martin, R., and Miller, J.F. (eds), Apolline Politics and Poetics (Athens), 405–71Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2009b. “Narratology, Deixis, and the Performance of Choral Lyric: On Pindar’s First Pythian Ode,” in Grethlein, J., and Rengakos, A. (eds), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin), 241–73Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2011. “Giving Wings to the Aeginetan Sculptures: The Panhellenic Aspirations of Pindar’s Eighth Olympian,” in Fearn, D. (ed.), Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry (Oxford), 257–93Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2016. “Political and Dramatic Perspectives on Archaic Sculptures: Bacchylides’ Fourth Dithyramb (Ode 18) and the Treasury of the Athenians in Delphi,” in Cazzato, V., and Lardinois, A. (eds), The Look of Lyric: Greek Song and the Visual (Leiden), 16–49Google Scholar
Bader, F. 2006. “Bellérophon et l’écriture dans l’Iliade,” in Bombi, R. (ed.), Studi linguistici in onore di Roberto Gusmani (Alessandria), 43–71Google Scholar
Bakewell, G. 1997. “Μετοικία in the Supplices of Aeschylus,” Classical Antiquity 16: 209–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakewell, G. 2013. Aeschylus’s Suppliant Women: The Tragedy of Immigration, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E.J. 1997b. “Storytelling in the Future: Truth, Time, and Tense in Homeric Epic,” in Bakker, E.J., and Kahane, A. (eds), Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic (Cambridge), 11–36Google Scholar
Bakker, E.J. 2005. Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E.J., and Kahane, A. (eds) 1997. Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakola, E. 2014. “Interiority, the ‘Deep Earth’ and the Spatial Symbolism of Darius’ Apparition in the Persians of Aeschylus,” Cambridge Classical Journal 60: 1–36Google Scholar
Bakola, E. 2016. “Textile Symbolism and the Wealth of the Earth: Creation, Production and Destruction in the Tapestry Scene of Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” in Harlow, M., Nosch, M.L., and Fanfani, G. (eds), Spinning Fates and the Song of the Loom: The Use of Textiles, Clothing and Cloth Productions as Metaphor, Symbol and Narrative Device in Greek and Latin Literature (Oxford)Google Scholar
Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction, LondonGoogle Scholar
Bardel, R. 2000. “Eidôla in Epic, Tragedy, and Vase-Painting,” in Rutter, N.K., and Sparkes, B.A. (eds), Word and Image in Ancient Greece (Edinburgh), 140–60Google Scholar
Bardel, R. 2005. “Spectral Traces: Ghosts in Tragic Fragments,” in McHardy, F., Robson, J., and Harvey, D. (eds), Lost Dramas of Classical Athens (Exeter), 83–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. 1995. “Narrative and the Messenger in Aeschylus’ Persians,” American Journal of Philology 116: 539–57Google Scholar
Barrett, J. 2002. Staged Narrative: Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. 2007. “Aeschylus,” in de Jong, I., and Nünlist, R. (eds), Time in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden), 255–73Google Scholar
Bassi, K. 1998. Acting like Men: Gender, Drama, and Nostalgia in Ancient Greece, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Bassi, K. 2014. “Homer’s Achaean Wall and the Hypothetical Past,” in Wohl, V. (ed.), Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought (Cambridge), 122–41Google Scholar
Bassi, K. 2016. Traces of the Past: Classics between History and Archaeology, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Bassi, K. 2017. “Mimesis and Mortality: Reperformance and the Dead among the Living in Hecuba and Hamlet,” in Hunter, R.L., and Uhlig, A. (eds), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric (Cambridge), 138–59Google Scholar
Battezzato, L. 2013. “Dithyramb and Greek Tragedy,” in Kowalzig, B., and Wilson, P. (eds), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford), 93–110Google Scholar
Beck, D. 2001. “Direct and Indirect Speech in the Homeric ‘Hymn to Demeter’,” Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974–) 131: 53–74Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Bednarowski, K.P. 2015. “Surprise and Suspense in Aeschylus’ Agamemnon,” American Journal of Philology 136: 179–205Google Scholar
Bell, J.M. 1984. “God, Man, and Animal in Pindar’s Second Pythian,” in Gerber, D.E. (ed.). Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of L. Woodbury (Chico, CA), 1–31Google Scholar
Benardete, S. 1968. “Two Notes on Aeschylus’ Septem 2nd Part,” Wiener Studien 81: 5–17Google Scholar
Bergerard, L. 2006. “L’organizzazione del tempo nella tragedia eschilea,” Appunti Romani di Filologia 8: 21–38Google Scholar
Bergren, A. 1982. “Sacred Apostrophe: Re-presentation and Imitation in the Homeric Hymns,” Arethusa 15: 83–108Google Scholar
Berman, D.W. 2015. Myth, Literature, and the Creation of the Topography of Thebes, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Bers, V. 1997. Speech in Speech: Studies of Incorporated Oratio Recta in Attic Drama and Oratory, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, H. 1991. “‘Race,’ Time and the Revision of Modernity,” Oxford Literary Review 13: 193–219Google Scholar
Biles, Z.P. 2006. “Aeschylus’ Afterlife: Reperformance by Decree in 5th C. Athens?,” Illinois Classical Studies 31/32: 206–42Google Scholar
Blaise, F. 1992. “L’Épisode de Typhée dans la Théogonie d’Hésiode (v. 820–885): La stabilisation du monde,” Revue des Etudes Grecques 105: 349–70Google Scholar
Blau, H. 1982. “Universals of Performance; Or, Amortizing Play,” SubStance 11/12: 140–61Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2000. “Il sotterfugio orale negli epinici pindarici,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 60: 69–86Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2004b. “Relative Pronouns and Memory: Pindar beyond Syntax,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 102: 41–68Google Scholar
Borggreen, G., and Gade, R. (eds) 2013. Performing Archives/Archives of Performance, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Bowie, A.M. 1993. “Religion and Politics in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” Classical Quarterly 43: 10–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, J. 1990. “Pindar’s Paradoxical ‘Ego’ and a Recent Controversy about the Performance of his Epinicia,” in Slings, S.R. (ed.), The Poet’s “I” in Archaic Greek Lyric (Amsterdam), 41–58Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2001. “Quand Pindare nomme Homère… Théories du nom propre, étymologies, intertextualités et énonciation lyrique,” in Dubel, S., and Rabau, S. (eds), Fiction d’auteur? Le discours biographique sur l’auteur de l’Antiquité à nos jours (Paris), 25–46Google Scholar
Brillante, C. 1998. “Ixion, Peirithoos e la stirpe dei centauri,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 40: 41–76Google Scholar
Brown, B. 2003. A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budelmann, F. 2009. “Introducing Greek Lyric,” in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric (Cambridge), 1–18Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. 2017. “Performance, Reperformance, Preperformance: The Paradox of Repeating the Unique in Pindaric Epinician and Beyond,” in Hunter, R.L., and Uhlig, A. (eds), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric (Cambridge), 42–62Google Scholar
Bushnell, R.W. 1982. “Reading ‘Winged Words’: Homeric Bird Signs, Similes, and Epiphany,” Helios 9: 1–14Google Scholar
Cairns, D.L. 1993. Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 1999. “Performative Aspects of the Choral Voice in Greek Tragedy,” in Goldhill, S., and Osborne, R. (eds), Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy (Cambridge), 125–53Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. 2004. “Deictic Ambiguity and Auto-Referentiality: Some Examples from Greek Poetics,” Arethusa 37: 415–43Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2014. “Narrative Pragmatics and Semantics: The Poetic Creation of Cyrene,” in Edmunds, L. (ed.), Approaches to Greek Myth (Baltimore, MD), 281–352Google Scholar
Calvo Martínez, J.L. 2013. “The ‘Katábasis’ of the Hero,” in Pirenne-Delforge, V., and Suárez de la Torre, E. (eds), Héros et heroines dans les mythes et les cultes grecs (Liège), 67–78Google Scholar
Cameron, H.D. 1970. “The Power of Words in the Seven Against Thebes,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 101: 95–118Google Scholar
Carey, C. 1989a. “The Performance of the Victory Ode,” American Journal of Philology 110: 545–65Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2015. “Stesichorus and the Epic Cycle,” in Finglass, P.J., and Kelly, A. (eds), Stesichorus in Context (Oxford), 45–62Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D.S. 1976. “Weaving with Points of Gold: Pindar’s Sixth Olympian,” Arion 6: 5–44Google Scholar
Castaldo, D. 2009. “‘The Sound of Krotala Maddening Women’: Krotala and Percussion Instruments in Ancient Attic Pottery,” in Yatromanolakis, D. (ed.), An Archaeology of Representations: Ancient Greek Vase-Painting and Contemporary Methodologies (Athens), 282–97Google Scholar
Catenacci, C. 2004. “Realtà e immaginario degli scudi dei Sette,” in Bernardini, P. (ed.), La città di Argo: Mito, storia, tradizioni poetiche (Rome), 163–76Google Scholar
Catenaccio, C. 2011. “Dream as Image and Action in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 51: 202–31Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P., and Milanezi, S. 2007. “Dithyramb, Tragedy – and Cyrene,” in Wilson, P. (ed.), The Greek Theatre and Festivals (Oxford), 185–214Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2007. “Theatre Rituals,” in Wilson, P. (ed.), The Greek Theater and Festivals (Oxford), 48–66Google Scholar
Chaston, C. 2010. Tragic Props and Cognitive Function: Aspects of the Function of Images in Thinking, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Chiasson, C.C. 1999. “Σωφρονοῦντες ἐν χρόνωι; The Athenians and Time in Aeschylus’ ‘Eumenides’,” Classical Journal 95: 139–61Google Scholar
Chiesi, G.M. 2014. The Play of Words: Blood Ties and Power Relations in Aeschylus’ “Oresteia,” BerlinGoogle Scholar
Cingano, E. 2003. “Entre skolion et enkomion: Réflexions sur le ‘genre’ et la performance de la lyrique chorale grecque,” in Jouanna, J., and Leclant, J. (eds), La poésie grecque antique (Paris), 17–45Google Scholar
Clay, J.S. 1992. “Pindar’s Twelfth Pythian: Reed and Bronze,” American Journal of Philology 113: 519–25Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1979. “The Hymn to Zeus, Pathe Mathos, and the End of the Parodos of the Agamemnon,” Traditio 35: 1–19Google Scholar
Coo, L. forthcoming-2019. “Satyric Nostalgia in the Aeschylean Tetralogy,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 62Google Scholar
Cousin, C. 2005. “La Nékyia homérique et les fragments des Évocateurs d’âmes d’Eschyle,” Gaia 9: 137–52Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2003. “Dolphins of Dionysus,” in Csapo, E., and Miller, M.C. (eds), Poetry, Theory, Praxis: The Social Life of Myth, Word and Image in Ancient Greece (Oxford), 69–98Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2013. “Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysiac Genre-Crossing,” in Bakola, E., Prauscello, L., and Telò, M. (eds), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres (Cambridge), 40–80Google Scholar
Csapo, E., and Miller, M.C. 2007. The Origins of Theater in Ancient Greece and Beyond: From Ritual to Drama, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Currie, B. 2017. “Festival, Symposium, and Epinician (Re)performance: The Case of Nemean 4 and Others,” in Hunter, R.L., and Uhlig, A. (eds), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric (Cambridge), 187–208Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G.B. 1994. “First-Person Problems in Pindar,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39: 117–39Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G.B. 2004. “Past Future and Present Past: Temporal Deixis in Greek Archaic Lyric,” Arethusa 37: 267–94Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G.B. 2007. “ἢν ἰδού: ecce satyri (Pratina, PMG 708 = TrGF 4 F 3): Alcuni considerazioni sull’uso della deissi nei testi lirici e teatrali,” in Perusino, F., and Colantonio, M. (eds), Dalla lirica corale alla poesia drammatica: Forme e funzioni del canto corale nella tragedia e nella commedia greca (Pisa), 95–128Google Scholar
D’Alfonso, F. 2008. “La terra desolata: Osservazioni sul destino di Bellerofonte (Il. 6, 200–202),” Museum Helveticum 65: 1–21Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1988. “Monody, Choral Lyric, and the Tyranny of the Hand-book,” Classical Quarterly 38: 52–64Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1998. “Euripides’ Electra: The Recognition Scene Again,” Classical Quarterly 48: 389–403Google Scholar
Day, J.W. 2010. Archaic Greek Epigram and Dedication: Representation and Reperformance, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
de Jong, I. 1987. “The Voice of Anonymity: τις-Speeches in the Iliad,” Eranos 85: 69–84Google Scholar
de Jong, I. 1991. Narrative in Drama: The Art of the Euripidean Messenger-Speech, LeidenGoogle Scholar
de Jong, I. 2009. “Metalepsis in Ancient Greek Literature,” in Grethlein, J., and Rengakos, A. (eds), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin), 87–116Google Scholar
Degener, J.M. 2001. ‘The Caesura of the Symbolon in Aeschylus’ Agamemnon,” Arethusa 34: 61–96Google Scholar
del Pilar Blanco, M., and Peeren, E. (eds) 2013. The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory, LondonGoogle Scholar
Depew, M., and Obbink, D. 2000. Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Detienne, M. 1971. “Athena and the Mastery of the Horse,” History of Religions 11: 161–84Google Scholar
DeVito, A. 1999. “Eteocles, Amphiaraus, and Necessity in Aeschylus’ ‘Seven against Thebes’,” Hermes 127: 165–71Google Scholar
Di Marco, M. 2009. La tragedia greca: Forma, gioco scenico, tecniche drammatiche, RomeGoogle Scholar
Dickin, M. 2009. A Vehicle for Performance: Acting the Messenger in Greek Tragedy, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
Dickson, K. 1986. “Damasiphron Krusos: Art, Implement and Techne in Pindar,” Ramus 15: 122–42Google Scholar
Duncan, A. 2018. “The Familiar Mask,” in Mueller, M., and Telò, M. (eds), The Materialities of Greek Tragedy: Object and Affect in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides (London), 79–96Google Scholar
Easterling, P.E. 1985. “Anachronism in Greek Tragedy,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 1–10Google Scholar
Easterling, P.E. 1988. “Tragedy and Ritual: ‘Cry “Woe, Woe” But May the Good Prevail’,” Metis 3: 87–109Google Scholar
Easterling, P.E. 2002. “Actor as Icon,” in Easterling, P.E., and Hall, E. (eds), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession (Cambridge), 327–34Google Scholar
Ebbott, M. 2000. “The List of the War Dead in Aeschylus’ ‘Persians’,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 83–96Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. 2011. “Pindar’s Olympian 1.17 and Solo vs. Choral Epinician Performance,” Mnemosyne 64: 83–5Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 2002. “Sounds Off Stage and On Stage in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes,” in Aloni, A., Berardi, E., Besso, G., et al. (eds), I Sette a Tebe: Dal mito alla letteratura (Bologna), 105–16Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. 1984. “Traditional Narrative, Inference and Truth in the Lives of Greek Poets,” in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar (Liverpool), 315–69Google Scholar
Faraone, C.A. 1993. “The Wheel, the Whip and Other Implements of Torture: Erotic Magic in Pindar Pythian 4.213–19,” Classical Journal 89: 1–19Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2012. “Bacchylidean Myths,” in Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds), Reading the Victory Ode (Cambridge), 321–43Google Scholar
Fearn, D. 2017. Pindar’s Eyes: Visual and Material Culture in Epinician Poetry, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Felson, N. 1999. “Vicarious Transport: Fictive Deixis in Pindar’s Pythian Four,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99: 1–31Google Scholar
Felson, N. 2004a. “The Poetic Effects of Deixis in Pindar’s Ninth Pythian Ode,” Arethusa 37: 365–89Google Scholar
Felson, N. (ed.) 2004b. The Poetics of Deixis in Alcman, Pindar, and Other Lyric, Arethusa special issueGoogle Scholar
Felson Rubin, N. 1984. “The Epinician Speaker in Pindar’s First Olympian Ode: Toward a Model for Analyzing Character in Ancient Choral Lyric,” Poetics Today 5: 377–97Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, E. 2008. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Fitton Brown, A.D. 1961. “The Recognition-Scene in Choephori,” Revue des Etudes Grecques 74: 363–70Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. 1999. “Choral Voice and Narrative in the First Stasimon of Aeschylus’ ‘Agamemnon’,” Phoenix 53: 29–49Google Scholar
Flower, M.A. 2008. “The Iamidai,” in Dignas, B., and Trampedach, K. (eds), Practitioners of the Divine: Greek Priests and Religious Officials from Homer to Heliodorus (Cambridge), 187–206Google Scholar
Föllinger, S. 2003. Genosdependenzen: Studien zur Arbeit am Mythos bei Aischylos, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Ford, A. 2006. “The Genre of Genres: Paeans and Paian in Early Greek Poetry,” Poetica 38: 277–96Google Scholar
Foster, M. 2013. “Hagesias as Sunoikistêr: Seercraft and Colonial Ideology in Pindar’s Sixth Olympian Ode,” Classical Antiquity 32: 283–321Google Scholar
Foster, M. 2017. “Fathers and Sons in War: Seven Against Thebes, Pythian 8, and the Polemics of Genre,” in Torrance, I. (ed.), Aeschylus and War (London), 150–72Google Scholar
Franklin, J. 2013. “The Songbenders of Circular Choruses: Dithyramb and the ‘Demise of Music’,” in Kowalzig, B., and Wilson, P. (eds), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford), 213–36Google Scholar
Freeman, E. 2000. “Packing History, Count(er)ing Generations,” New Literary History 31: 727–44Google Scholar
Froidefond, C. 1971. Le Mirage égyptien dans la littérature grecque d’Homère à Aristote, Aix-en-ProvenceGoogle Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1994. “Athéna et l’invention de la flute,” Musica e Storia 2: 239–67Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 1995. Du masque au visage: Aspects de l’identité en Gréce ancienne, ParisGoogle Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, F. 2007. “The Invention of the Erinyes,” in Kraus, C., Goldhill, S., Foley, H.P., et al. (eds), Visualizing the Tragic: Drama, Myth, and Ritual in Greek Art (Oxford), 165–76Google Scholar
Führer, R. 1967. Formproblem-Untersuchungen zu den Reden in der frühgriechischen Lyrik, MunichGoogle Scholar
Gantz, T. 1980. “The Aischylean Tetralogy: Attested and Conjectured Groups,” American Journal of Philology 101: 133–64Google Scholar
Gantz, T. 1983. “The Chorus of Aischylos’ Agamemnon,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 87: 65–86Google Scholar
Garvie, A.F. 1970. “The Opening of the Choephoroi,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 17: 79–91Google Scholar
Garvie, A.F. 1978. “Aeschylus’ Simple Plots,” in Dawe, R.D., Diggle, J., and Easterling, P.E. (eds), Dionysiaca: Nine Studies in Greek Poetry (Cambridge), 63–86Google Scholar
Gentili, B., and Luisi, F. 1995. “La Pitica 12 di Pindaro e l’aulo di Mida,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 49: 7–31Google Scholar
Gerber, D.E. 1987. “Pindar’s Olympian Four: A Commentary,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 54: 7–24Google Scholar
Gianvittorio, L. (ed.) 2017. Choreutika: Performing and Theorizing Dance in Ancient Greece, PisaGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1988. “Battle Narrative and Politics in Aeschylus’ Persae,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 108: 189–93Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2000. “Civic Ideology and the Problem of Difference: The Politics of Aeschylean Tragedy, Once Again,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 120: 34–56Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2007. “What’s in a Wall?,” in Kraus, C., Goldhill, S., Foley, H.P., et al. (eds), Visualizing the Tragic: Drama, Myth, and Ritual in Greek Art (Oxford), 127–50Google Scholar
Goslin, O. 2010. “Hesiod’s Typhonomachy and the Ordering of Sound,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 140: 351–73Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2007. “The Hermeneutics and Poetics of Memory in Aeschylus’ Persae,” Arethusa 40: 363–96Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2008. “Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 128: 27–51Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010. The Greeks and their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BCE, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2013. “Choral Intertemporality in the Oresteia,” in Gagné, R., and Hopman, M.G. (eds), Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy (Cambridge), 78–99Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. “Homeric Words and Speakers,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 106: 36–57Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1995. “Brilliant Dynasts: Power and Politics in the ‘Oresteia’,” Classical Antiquity 14: 62–129Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 1999. “The King and Eye: The Rule of the Father in Greek Tragedy,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 44: 20–84Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 2002. “Slaves of Dionysos: Satyrs, Audience, and the Ends of the ‘Oresteia’,” Classical Antiquity 21: 195–258Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 2007. “The King and Eye: The Rule of the Father in Greek Tragedy,” in Lloyd, M. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus (Oxford), 93–140Google Scholar
Griffith, M. 2009. “The Poetry of Aeschylus (in its Traditional Contexts),” in Jouanna, J., Montanari, F., and Hernández, A.-C. (eds), Eschyle à l’aube du théâtre occidental: Neuf exposés suivis de discussions (Geneva), 1–49Google Scholar
Griffith, R.D. 1993. “In the Dark Backward: Time in Pindaric Narrative,” Poetics Today 14: 607–23Google Scholar
Griffiths, E. 2014. “View from Vanishing Point: Kairos and the Meta-City in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes and Pindar’s Pythian 8,” Mnemosyne 67: 725–61Google Scholar
Gruber, M. 2008. Der Chor in den Tragödien des Aischylos: Affekt und Reaktion, TübingenGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. 1989. Inventing the Barbarians: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. 2006. The Theatrical Cast of Athens: Interactions between Ancient Greek Drama and Society, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. 1993. “The Function and Aesthetics of the Greek Tragic Mask,” in Slater, N., and Zimmermann, B. (eds), Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie (Stuttgart), 195–211Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Hanink, J. 2017. “Archives, Repertoires, Bodies and Bones: Thoughts on Reperformance for Classicists,” in Hunter, R. L., and Uhlig, A. (eds), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric (Cambridge), 21–41Google Scholar
Hanink, J., and Fletcher, R. (eds) 2016. Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists and Biography, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hanink, J., and Uhlig, A. 2016. “Aeschylus and his Afterlife in the Classical Period: ‘My Poetry Did Not Die with me’,” in Constantinidis, S. (ed.), The Reception of Aeschylus’ Plays through Shifting Models and Frontiers (Leiden), 51–79Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2000. The Emptiness of Asia: Aeschylus’ “Persians” and the History of the Fifth Century, BristolGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. 1999a. “Disentagling the Beast: Humans and Other Animals in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 119: 17–47Google Scholar
Heath, J. 1999b. “The Serpent and the Sparrows: Homer and the Parodos of Aeschylus’ Agamemnon,” Classical Quarterly 49: 396–407Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2005. The Talking Greeks: Speech, Animals, and the Other in Homer, Aeschylus, and Plato, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1994–5. “‘Why Should I Dance?’: Choral Self-Referentiality in Greek Tragedy,” Arion 3: 56–111Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1996. “Dancing in Athens, Dancing on Delos: Some Patterns of Choral Projection in Euripides,” Philologus 140: 48–62Google Scholar
Herington, J. 1985. Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Hopman, M.G. 2013. “Chorus, Conflict, and Closure in Aeschylus’ Persians,” in Gagné, R., and Hopman, M.G. (eds), Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy (Cambridge), 58–77Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2004. Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. 2012. “What Happened Later to the Families of Pindaric Patrons – and to Epinician Poetry?,” in Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds), Reading the Victory Ode (Cambridge), 93–110Google Scholar
Howie, J.G. 1983. “The Revision of Myth in Pindar Olympian 1,” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4: 277–313Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1985. The Pindaric Mind: A Study of Logical Structure in Early Greek Poetry, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1986. “Pegasus’ Bridle and the Poetics of Pindar’s Thirteenth Olympian,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 27–48Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1987a. “The ‘Cooking’ of Pelops: Pindar and the Process of Mythological Revisionism,” Helios 14: 3–21Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1987b. “Two Notes on the Myth of Aeacus in Pindar,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 28: 5–22Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 1993. “The Theban Amphiaraion and Pindar’s Vision on the Road to Delphi,” Museum Helveticum 50: 193–203Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 2001. “Pindar and Athens after the Persian Wars,” in Papenfuss, D., and Strocka, V.M. (eds), Gab es das Griechische Wunder? (Mainz), 387–97Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 2004. “The Dissemination of Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts,” in Mackie, C. (ed.), Oral Performance and its Context, Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece, 5 (Leiden), 71–94Google Scholar
Hubbard, T.K. 2011. “The Dissemination of Non-Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts,” in Bowie, E.L., and Athanassaki, L. (eds), Archaic and Classical Choral Poetry (Berlin), 347–64Google Scholar
Hunter, R.L. 2009. Critical Moments in Classical Literature: Studies in the Ancient View of Literature and its Uses, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Hurst, A. 1985. “Aspects du temps chez Pindare,” in Hurst, A. (ed.), Pindare: Huit exposés suivis de discussions (Vandoeuvres/Geneva), 155–206Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G.O. 2001. Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Instone, S. 1990. “Love and Sex in Pindar: Some Practical Thrusts,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 30–42Google Scholar
Jacobson, D.J. 2015. “Vocative ΟΥΤΟΣ in Greek Drama,” Classical Philology 110: 193–214Google Scholar
Johnston, S.I. 1995. “Song of the Iynx: Magic and Rhetoric in Pythian 4,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 125: 177–206Google Scholar
Johnston, S.I. 1999. Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Jouan, F. 1981. “L’évocation des morts dans la tragédie Grecque,” Revue de l’histoire des religions 198: 403–21Google Scholar
Jouan, F. 1983. “Réflexions sur le rôle du protagoniste tragique,” Théâtre et spectacles dans l’antiquité (Leiden), 63–80Google Scholar
Jouan, F. 1995. “Le mythe de Bellerophon chez Pindare,” Revue des Etudes Grecques 108: 271–87Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1992. “Rite et spectacle dans la tragédie grecque: Remarques sur l’utilisation dramaturgique des libations et des sacrifices,” Pallas 47–56Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1997. “Notes sur la scène de la reconnaissance dans les Choéphores d’Eschyle (v. 205–211) et sa parodie dans l’Électre d’Euripide (v. 532–537),” Cahiers du GITA 10: 69–85Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 2009. “Du mythe à la scène: La création théâtrale chez Eschyle,” in Jouanna, J., Montanari, F., and Hernández, A.-C. (eds), Eschyle à l’aube du théâtre occidental: Neuf exposés suivis de discussions (Geneva), 57–111Google Scholar
Käppel, L. 1999. “Die Rolle des Chores des Aeschylus: vom epischen Erzähler über das lyrische Ich zur dramatis persona,” in Riemer, P., and Zimmermann, B. (eds), Der Chor im antiken und modernen Drama (Stuttgart), 61–88Google Scholar
Katuszewski, P. 2011. Ceci n’est pas un fantôme: Essai sur les personnages de fantômes dans les théâtres antique et contemporain, ParisGoogle Scholar
Knox, B.M.W. 1972. “Aeschylus and the Third Actor,” American Journal of Philology 93: 104–24Google Scholar
Köhnken, A. 1974. “Pindar as Innovator: Poseidon Hippios and the Relevance of the Pelops Story in Olympian 1,” Classical Quarterly 27: 199–206Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. 2013. “Dancing Dolphins on the Wine-Dark Sea: Dithyramb and Social Change in the Archaic Mediterranean,” in Kowalzig, B., and Wilson, P. (eds), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford), 30–58Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B., and Wilson, P. (eds) 2013b. “The World of Dithyramb,” in Kowalzig, B., and Wilson, P. (eds), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford), 1–28Google Scholar
Krumeich, R., Pechstein, N., and Seidensticker, B. (eds) 1999. Das griechische Satyrspiel, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
Kucharski, J. 2004. “Orestes’ Lock: The Motif of Tomb Rituals in the ‘Oresteia’ and the Two ‘Electra’ Plays,” Eos 91: 9–33Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1991. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Kurke, L. 2013. “Pindar’s Pythian 11 and the Oresteia: Contestatory Ritual Poetics in the 5th c. BCE,” Classical Antiquity 32: 101–75Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. 2002. “The Subjectivity of Greek Performance,” in Easterling, P.E., and Hall, E. (eds), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession (Cambridge), 395–419Google Scholar
Lamari, A. 2009. “Knowing a Story’s End: Future Reflexive in the Tragic Narrative of the Argive Expedition Against Thebes,” in Grethlein, J., and Rengakos, A. (eds), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin), 399–420Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Leclerc, M.C. 1993. La Parole chez Hésiode: A la recherche de l’harmonie perdue, ParisGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.M. 2004. “‘Evil Wealth of Raiment’: Deadly πέπλοι in Greek Tragedy,” Classical Journal 99: 253–79Google Scholar
Lepecki, A. 2004. “Introduction: Presence and Body in Dance Performance Theory,” in Lepecki, A. (ed.), On the Presence of the Body: Essays on Dance and Performance Theory (Middletown, CT), 1–9Google Scholar
Lepecki, A. 2010. “The Body as Archive: Will to Re-enact and the Afterlives of Dances,” Dance Research Journal 42: 28–48Google Scholar
LeVen, P. 2013. “The Colors of Sound: Poikilia and its Aesthetic Contexts,” Greek and Roman Musical Studies 1: 229–42Google Scholar
LeVen, P. 2014. The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Lyric Poetry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1955. “The Structural Study of Myth,” Journal of American Folklore 68: 428–44Google Scholar
Lévy, E. 1983. “Le théâtre et le rêve: Le rêve dans le théâtre d’Eschyle,” Théâtre et spectacles dans l”antiquité (Leiden), 141–68Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 2007. “Looking at Shield Devices: Tragedy and Vase Painting,” in Kraus, C., Goldhill, S., Foley, H.P., et al. (eds), Visualizing the Tragic: Drama, Myth, and Ritual in Greek Art (Oxford), 151–64Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. 1990. “Pindar and the Afterlife,” in Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed.), Greek Epic, Lyric and Tragedy: The Academic Papers of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones (Oxford), 245–83Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S.H. 1994. “‘Homeric Hymn to Apollo’: Prototype and Paradigm of Choral Performance,” Arion 3: 25–40Google Scholar
Luckhurst, M., and Morin, E. 2014. Theatre and Ghosts: Materiality, Performance and Modernity, Houndmills, Basingstoke; New YorkGoogle Scholar
Mace, S. 2002. “Why the Oresteia’s Sleeping Dead Won’t Lie. Part I: Agamemnon,” Classical Journal 98: 35–56Google Scholar
Mace, S. 2004. “Why the Oresteia’s Sleeping Dead Won’t Lie. Part II: Choephoroi and Eumenides,” Classical Journal 100: 39–60Google Scholar
Macías Otero, S.M. 2015. “On the Threshold of Hades: Necromancy and Nékyia in Some Passages of Greek Tragedy,” Les Études Classiques 83: 137–53Google Scholar
Mackie, H.S. 2003. Graceful Errors: Pindar and the Performance of Praise, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
Maehler, H. 1997. Die Lieder des Bakchylides II: Die Dithyramben und Fragmente, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C.W. 1994. “The Rule of Three Actors in Practice,” Text and Presentation 15: 53–61Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. 1999. “Some Fifth-Century Masking Conventions,” Greece and Rome 46: 188–202Google Scholar
Marshall, C.W. 2016. “Three Actors in Old Comedy, Again,” in Harrison, G,. and Liapis, V. (eds), Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre (Leiden), 257–78Google Scholar
Martin, R.P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.P. 2004. “Home is the Hero: Deixis and Semantics in Pindar Pythian 8,” Arethusa 37: 343–63Google Scholar
Marx, P. 1993. “The Introduction of the Gorgoneion to the Shield and Aegis of Athena and the Question of Endoios,” Revue Archéologique 2: 227–68Google Scholar
Matzner, S. 2016. Rethinking Metonymy: Literary Theory and Poetic Practice from Pindar to Jakobson, OxfordGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, G. 2004. “Professional Foul: Persona in Pindar,” in Bell, S., and Davies, G. (eds), Games and Festivals in Classical Antiquity (Oxford), 25–32Google Scholar
Michelini, A.N. 1982. Tradition and Dramatic Form in the Persians of Aeschylus, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Mikellidou, K. 2016. “Aeschylus Reading Homer: The Case of the Psychagogoi,” in Efstathiou, A., and Karamanou, I. (eds), Homeric Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts (Berlin), 331–42Google Scholar
Miller, A.M. 1979. “The ‘Address to the Delian Maidens’ in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo: Epilogue or Transition?,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 109: 173–86Google Scholar
Miller, A.M. 1986. From Delos to Delphi: A Literary Study of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Minchin, E. 2011. “Arming-Scenes,” in Finkelberg, M. (ed.), The Homer Encyclopedia (Oxford), 97Google Scholar
Mitchell-Boyask, R. 2006. “The Marriage of Cassandra and the Oresteia: Text, Image, Performance,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 136: 269–98Google Scholar
Moreau, A. 1997. “Apollon, Oreste et les prédictions énigmatiques: Un paradox,” Cahiers du GITA 10: 139–52Google Scholar
Morgan, K.A. 1993. “Pindar the Professional and the Rhetoric of the Komos,” Classical Philology 88: 1–15Google Scholar
Morgan, K.A. 1994. “Apollo’s Favorites,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 35: 121–43Google Scholar
Morgan, K.A. 2015. Pindar and the Construction of Syracusan Monarchy in the Fifth Century B.C., OxfordGoogle Scholar
Moritz, H.E. 1979. “Refrain in Aeschylus: Literary Adaptation of Traditional Form,” Classical Philology 74: 187–213Google Scholar
Morrell, K.S. 1996. “The Fabric of Persuasion: Clytaemnestra, Agamemnon, and the Sea of Garments,” Classical Journal 92: 141–65Google Scholar
Morris, T. 2013. “Is Plato Really in Favour of Monotonous Literature?,” Dialogue 52: 491–521Google Scholar
Morrison, A.D. 2007. Performances and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes, LondonGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J.V. 1999. “Homeric Darkness: Patterns and Manipulation of Death Scenes in the ‘Iliad’,” Hermes 127: 129–44Google Scholar
Most, G.W. 1985. The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Mueller, M. 2015. Objects as Actors: Props and the Poetics of Performance in Greek Tragedy, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Mureddu, P. 2000. “Note dionisiache: Osservazioni sulle ‘Bacchanti’ di Euripide e sugli ‘Edoni’ di Eschilo,” Lexis 18: 117–25Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1988. “Body and Voice in Greek Tragedy,” Yale Journal of Criticism 1: 23–43Google Scholar
Murray, P., and Wilson, P. 2004. Music and the Muses: The Culture of “Mousike” in the Classical Athenian City, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Nagy, G. 1986. “Pindar’s Olympian 1 and the Aetiology of the Olympic Games,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 116: 71–88Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2000. “‘Dream of a Shade’: Refractions of Epic Vision in Pindar’s Pythian 8 and Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 97–118Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2011. “A Second Look at the Poetics of Re-enactment in Ode 13 of Bacchylides,” in Athanassaki, L., and Bowie, E.L. (eds), Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination (Berlin), 173–206Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2013. “The Delian Maidens and Choral Mimesis in Classical Drama,” in Gagné, R., and Hopman, M.G. (eds), Choral Mediations in Greek Tragedy (Cambridge), 227–56Google Scholar
Neitzel, H. 1978. “Funktion und Bedeutung des Zeus-Hymnus im ‘Agamemnon’ des Aischylos,” Hermes 106: 406–25Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. 2011. “Pindar’s Olympian 4: Psaumis and Camarina after the Deinomenids,” Classical Philology 106: 93–114Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2007. “Pindar and Bacchylides,” in de Jong, I., and Nünlist, R. (eds), Time in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden), 233–51Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
O’Higgins, D. 1997. “Medea as Muse,” in Clauss, J.J., and Johnston, S.I. (eds), Medea (Princeton), 103–26Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. 1998. “Aeschylus, Homer, and the Serpent at the Breast,” Phoenix 52: 216–29Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, P. 2000. “Satyr and Image in Aeschylus’ Theoroi,” Classical Quarterly 50: 353–66Google Scholar
Oakley, J.H. 1988. “Perseus, the Graiai, and Aeschylus’ Phorkides,” American Journal of Archaeology 92: 383–91Google Scholar
Ogden, D. 2013. Drakon: Dragon Myth and Serpent Cult in the Greek and Roman Worlds, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Papodopoulou, Z., and Pirenne-Delforge, V. 2001. “Inventire et réinventire l’aulos: Autour de la XIIe Pythique de Pindare,” in Brulé, P., and Vendries, C. (eds), Chanter les dieux: Musique et religion dans l’antiquité grecque et romaine (Rennes), 37–58Google Scholar
Park, A. 2017. “Reality, Illusion, or Both? Cloud-Women in Stesichorus and Pindar,” in Park, A. (ed.), Resemblance and Reality in Greek Thought (London), 65–79Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. 2011. “Past and Present in Pindar’s Religious Poetry,” in Blok, J., and van der Poel, M. (eds), Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World (Leiden), 58–78Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. 2012. “Pindar and the Reconstruction of the Past,” in Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L., and Maciver, C. (eds), Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras (Edinburgh), 95–112Google Scholar
Pavlovskis, Z. 1977. “The Voice of the Actor in Greek Tragedy,” Classical World 71: 113–23Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. 1987. “Pindarus Homericus: Pythian 3.1–80,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 91: 39–63Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. 2004. “Initiating the Viewer: Deixis and Visual Perception in Alcman’s Lyric Drama,” Arethusa 37: 295–316Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. 2009. “Choreia and Aesthetics in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo: The Performance of the Delian Maidens (lines 156–64),” Classical Antiquity 28: 39–70Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. 2013. “Dithyramb and the Problem of Choral Mimesis,” in Kowalzig, B., and Wilson, P. (eds), Dithyramb in Context (Oxford), 352–67Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. 2015. “Dance and Aesthetic Perception,” in Destrée, P., and Murray, P. (eds), A Companion to Ancient Aethetics (Oxford), 204–17Google Scholar
Peradotto, J.J. 1969. “Cledonomancy in the Oresteia,” American Journal of Philology 90: 1–21Google Scholar
Perris, S. 2011. “What Maketh the Messenger: Reportage in Greek Tragedy,” in Mackey, A. (ed.), ASCS 32 Selected Proceedings, ascs.org.au/news/ascs32/Perris.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pfeijffer, I.L. 1999. Three Aeginetan Odes of Pindar: A Commentary on Nemean V, Nemean III and Pythian VIII, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Phillips, T. 2013. “Epinician Variations: Music and Text in Pindar, Pythians 2 and 12,” Classical Quarterly 63: 37–56Google Scholar
Podlecki, A.J. 1972. “The Aeschylean Chorus as Dramatic Persona,” in Studi classici in onore di Quintino Cataudella (Catania), 187–204Google Scholar
Pöhlmann, E., and West, M.L. 2001. Documents of Ancient Greek Music: The Extant Melodies and Fragments, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Poli-Palladini, L. 2016. A Cloud of Dust: Mimesis and Mystification in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes, AlessandriaGoogle Scholar
Poochigian, A. 2007–8. “Arguments from Silence: Text and Stage in Aeschylus’ ‘Seven Against Thebes’,” Classical Journal 103: 1–11Google Scholar
Porter, J. 1990. “Patterns of Perception in Aeschylus,” in Griffith, M., and Mastronarde, D.J. (eds), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer (Atlanta, GA), 31–56Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2007. “Lasus of Hermione, Pindar and the Riddle of S,” Classical Quarterly 57: 1–21Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2010. The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 2011. “Making and Unmaking: The Achaean Wall and the Limits of Fictionality in Homeric Criticism,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 141: 1–36Google Scholar
Power, T. 2000. “The ‘Parthenoi’ of Bacchylides 13,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100: 67–81Google Scholar
Power, T. 2011. “Cyberchorus: Pindar’s Keledones and the Aura of the Artificial,” in Athanassaki, L., and Bowie, E.L. (eds), Archaic and Classical Choral Song (Berlin), 67–113Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. 2012. “Epinician Sounds: Pindar and Musical Innovation,” in Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds), Reading the Victory Ode (Cambridge), 58–82Google Scholar
Prins, Y. 1991. “The Power of the Speech Act: Aeschylus’ Furies and their Binding Song,” Arethusa 24: 177–96Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1967. “Euripides Heautontimoroumenos,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 98: 365–71Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1994. “Gods’ Intervention and Epiphany in Sophocles,” American Journal of Philology 115: 15–46Google Scholar
Revermann, M. 2008. “Aeschylus’ Eumenides, Chronotypes, and the ‘Aetiological Mode’,” in Revermann, M., and Wilson, P. (eds), Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin (Oxford), 237–61Google Scholar
Revermann, M. 2016. “Generalizing about Props: Greek Drama, Comparator Traditions, and the Analysis of Stage Objects,” in Harrison, G., and Liapis, V. (eds), Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre (Leiden), 77–88Google Scholar
Ringer, M. 1998. Electra and the Empty Urn: Metatheater and Role Playing in Sophocles, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
Robbins, E. 1975. “Jason and Cheiron: The Myth of Pindar’s fourth Pythian,” Phoenix 29: 205–213Google Scholar
Robbins, E. 1986. “The Broken Wall, the Burning Roof and Tower: Pindar, Ol. 8.31–46,” Classical Quarterly 36: 317–21Google Scholar
Robbins, E. 1997. “Public Poetry,” in Gerber, D.E. (ed.), A Companion to the Greek Lyric Poets (Leiden), 221–87Google Scholar
Roberts, D.H. 1985. “Orestes as Fulfillment, Teraskopos, and Teras in the Oresteia,” American Journal of Philology 106: 283–97Google Scholar
Roisman, H.M. 1990. “The Messenger and Eteocles in the ‘Seven Against Thebes’,” L’Antiquité Classique 59: 17–36Google Scholar
Roman, D. 2005. “Archival Drag: Or, the Afterlife of Performance,” in Roman, D. (ed.), Performance in America (Durham, NC), 137–78Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P.A. 2001. Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Ruffy, M.V. 2004. “Visualization and ‘Deixis am Phantasma’ in Aeschylus’ ‘Persae’,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 78: 11–28Google Scholar
Rusten, J.S. 2006. “Who ‘Invented’ Comedy? The Ancient Candidates for the Origins of Comedy and the Visual Evidence,” American Journal of Philology 127: 37–66Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2001. Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with a Survey of the Genre, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Said, S. 2007. “Tragedy and Reversal: The Example of the Persians,” in Lloyd, M. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Aeschylus (Oxford), 71–92Google Scholar
Sancassano, M. 1996–7. “Ὁ δράκων ποικίλος,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 21: 79–92Google Scholar
Schadewaldt, W. 1961. “Die Wappnung des Eteokles: Zu Aischylos Sieben gegen Theben,” in Kronymann, J.R., and Zinn, E. (eds), Eranion (Tübingen), 105–16Google Scholar
Schein, S.L. 2009. “Narrative Technique in the Parodos of Aeschylus’ Agamemnon,” in Grethlein, J., and Rengakos, A. (eds), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin), 377–98Google Scholar
Schlesier, R. 2002. “Idole und Gewebe,” in Schwindt, J.P. (ed.), Klassische Philologie “inter disciplinas” (Heidelberg), 1–23Google Scholar
Schmitz, T. 1994. “Noch einmal zum Mythos in Pindars vierter olympischer Ode,” Rheinisches Museum 137: 209–17Google Scholar
Schneider, R. 2011. Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Scodel, R. 1982. “The Achaean Wall and the Myth of Destruction,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 86: 33–50Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 1996. “Δόμων ἄγαλμα: Virgin Sacrifice and Aesthetic Object,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 126: 111–28Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1985. “Messages to the Underworld: An Aspect of Poetic Immortalization in Pindar,” American Journal of Philology 106: 199–212Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1986a. “Greek Tragedy: Writing, Truth, and the Representation of the Self,” in Segal, C. (ed.), Interpreting Greek Tragedy: Myth, Poetry, Text (Ithaca, NY), 75–112Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1986c. “Tragedy, Corporeality, and the Texture of Language: Matricide in the Three Electra Plays,” in Segal, C. (ed.), Interpreting Greek Tragedy: Myth, Poetry, Text (Ithaca, NY), 337–58Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1992. “Signs, Magic, and Letters in Euripides’ Hippolytus,” in Hexter, R., and Selden, D. (eds), Innovations of Antiquity (New York), 420–56Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1994. “The Gorgon and the Nightingale: The Voice of Female Lament in Pindar’s Twelfth Pythian Ode,” in Dunn, L.C., and Jones, N.A. (eds), Embodied Voices: Representing Female Vocality in Western Culture (Cambridge)Google Scholar
Shea, M. 2008. “Clytemnestra’s Net: Aeschylus’ Oresteia and the Text of Tapestries,” Arethusa 22: 41–58Google Scholar
Silk, M.S. 1999. “Style, Voice and Authority in the Choruses of Greek Drama,” in Riemer, P., and Zimmermann, B. (eds), Der Chor im antiken und modernen Drama (Stuttgart), 1–26Google Scholar
Slater, N. 2007. “Deconstructing Festivals,” in Wilson, P. (ed.), The Greek Theatre and Festivals (Oxford), 21–47Google Scholar
Small, J.P. 2016. “Skenographia in Brief,” in Harrison, G., and Liapis, V. (eds), Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre (Leiden), 111–30Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1967. Electra and Orestes: Three Recognitions in Greek Tragedy, N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A.H. 2010b. The Tangled Ways of Zeus: and Other Studies in and around Greek Tragedy, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sotiriou, M. 2016. “Performance, Poetic Identity and Intertextuality in Pindar’s Olympian 4,” in Efstathiou, A., and Karamanou, I. (eds), Homeric Receptions across Generic and Cultural Contexts (Berlin), 59–70Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 1993. “Pindar’s ‘Oggetti Parlanti’,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 159–80Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 1994. The Tyrant’s Writ: Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. 1995. “Eyeless in Argos: A Reading of Agamemnon 416–19,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 115: 175–82Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 1998. “Moving Images: Fifth-Century Victory Monuments and the Athlete’s Allure,” Classical Antiquity 17: 123–50Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 2001. Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Steiner, D. 2013. “The Gorgons’ Lament: Auletics, Poetics, and Chorality in Pindar’s Pythian 12,” American Journal of Philology 134: 173–208Google Scholar
Suarez de la Torre, E. 1988. “Adivinación y profecía en Píndaro (I),” Minerva 2: 65–106Google Scholar
Suarez de la Torre, E. 1989. “Adivinación y profecía en Píndaro (II),” Minerva 3: 63–101Google Scholar
Suarez de la Torre, E. 1990. “Parole de poète, parole de prophète: Les oracles et la mantique chez Pindare,” Kernos 3: 347–58Google Scholar
Sutton, D. 1971. “Aeschylus’ Edonians,” in RSC A.C.d.A.d. (ed.), Fons perennis: Saggi critici di filologia classica raccolti in onore di Vittorio d’Agostino (Turin), 387–411Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. 1988. Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Swift, L. 2015. “Stesichorus on Stage,” in Finglass, P.J., and Kelly, A. (eds), Stesichorus in Context (Oxford), 125–44Google Scholar
Taplin, O. 1972. “Aeschylean Silences and Silences in Aeschylus,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 76: 57–97Google Scholar
Taplin, O. 1977. The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Entrances and Exits in Greek Tragedy, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Taplin, O., and Wilson, P. 1993. “The Aetiology of Tragedy in the Oresteia,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 39: 169–80Google Scholar
Tarkow, T.A. 1980. “Thematic Implications of Costuming in the Oresteia,” Maia 32: 153–65Google Scholar
Taylor, D. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
Telò, M. 2016. Aristophanes and the Cloak of Comedy: Affect, Aesthetics, and the Canon, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Thalmann, W.G. 1980. “Xerxes’ Rags: Some Problems in Aeschylus’ Persians,” American Journal of Philology 101: 260–82Google Scholar
Thomas, O. forthcoming-2019. “Representation and Novelty in the Theoroi,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 62Google Scholar
Tordoff, R. 2016. “Actors’ Properties in Ancient Greek Drama: An Overview,” in Harrison, G., and Liapis, V. (eds), Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre (Leiden), 89–110Google Scholar
Torrance, I. 2011. “In the Footprints of Aeschylus: Recognition, Allusion, and Metapoetry in Euripides,” American Journal of Philology 132: 177–204Google Scholar
Trieschnigg, C. 2016. “Turning Sound into Sight in the Chorus’ Entrance Song of Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes,” in Cazzato, V., and Lardinois, A. (eds), The Look of Lyric: Greek Song and the Visual (Leiden), 217–37Google Scholar
Turner, C. 2001–2. “Perverted Supplication and Other Inversions in Aeschylus’ ‘Danaid’ Trilogy,” Classical Journal 97: 27–50Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. 2016. “A Poetic Possession: Pindar’s Lives of the Poets,” in Hanink, J., and Fletcher, R. (eds), Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity (Cambridge), 103–28Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. 2017. “Models of Reperformance in Bacchylides,” in Hunter, R.L., and Uhlig, A. (eds), Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric (Cambridge), 111–37Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. 2018a. “Noses in the Orchestra: Bodies, Objects, and Affect in Sophocles’ Ichneutai,” in Mueller, M., and Telò, M. (eds), The Materialities of Greek Tragedy: Object and Affect in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides (London), 153–67Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. 2018b. “Sailing and Singing: Alcaeus at Sea,” in Budelmann, F., and Phillips, T. (eds), Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece (Oxford), 63–92Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. forthcoming-a. “Birth by Hammer: Pandora and Somatic Construction,” in Dyer, J., and Surtees, A. (eds), Exploring Gender Diversity in the Ancient World (Edinburgh)Google Scholar
Uhlig, A. forthcoming-b. “Satyrs in Drag: Transvestism in Ion’s Omphale and Elsewhere,” in Antonopoulos, A., Christopoulos, M., and Harrison, G. (eds), Brill’s Companion to Satyr Drama (Leiden)Google Scholar
Uhlig, S. forthcoming. “Secondary Affect in Lessing, Mendelssohn, and Nicolai,” in Houen, A. (ed.), Affect and Literature (Cambridge)Google Scholar
van ‘t Wout, P.E. 2006. “Amphiaraos as Alkman: Compositional Strategy and Mythological Innovation in Pindar Pythian 8.39–60,” Mnemosyne 59: 1–18Google Scholar
Vasunia, P. 2001. The Gift of the Nile: Hellenizing Egypt from Aeschylus to Alexander, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. 1988. “The Shields of the Heroes,” in Vernant, J.P., and Vidal-Naquet, P. (eds), Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece (New York), 273–300.Google Scholar
Vierck, S. 2000 (1991). “Aigis: zu Typologie und Ikonographie eines mythischen Gegenstandes,” D.Phil. Diss. MünsterGoogle Scholar
Weiss, N. 2016. “The Choral Architecture of Pindar’s Eighth Paean,” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 146: 237–55Google Scholar
Wellenbach, M.C. 2015. “The Iconography of Dionysiac Choroi: Dithyramb, Tragedy, and the Basel Krater,” Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 55: 72–103Google Scholar
Wells, J.B. 2009. Pindar’s Verbal Art: An Ethnographic Study of Epinician Style, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
West, M.L. 2015. “Epic, Lyric, and Lyric Epic,” in Finglass, P.J., and Kelly, A. (eds), Stesichorus in Context (Oxford), 63–80Google Scholar
Whallon, W. 1958. “The Serpent at the Breast,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 89: 271–5Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 1988. “The Staging of the Recognition Scene in the Choephoroi,” Classical Quarterly 38: 82–5Google Scholar
Wiles, D. 2007. Mask and Performance in Greek Tragedy: From Ancient Festival to Modern Experimentation, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P. 1999. “The Aulos in Athens,” in Goldhill, S., and Osborne, R. (eds), Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy (Cambridge), 58–95Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R.P. 1954. “Aeschylus, Agamemnon 1343–71,” Classical Quarterly 4: 23–30Google Scholar
Winslow, R. 2012. “On Mimetic Style in Plato’s ‘Republic’,” Philosophy and Rhetoric 45: 46–64Google Scholar
Wise, J. 1998. Dionysus Writes: The Invention of Theatre in Ancient Greece, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
Wohl, V. 1998. Intimate Commerce: Exchange, Gender, and Subjectivity in Greek Tragedy, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
Worman, N. 2018. “Electra, Orestes, and the Sibling Hand,” in Mueller, M., and Telò, M. (eds), The Materialities of Greek Tragedy: Object and Affect in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides (London), 185–202Google Scholar
Young, D.C. 1968. Three Odes of Pindar: A Literary Study of Pythian II, Pythian 3. and Olympian 7, LeidenGoogle Scholar
Yziquel, P. 1997. “Le regard et la parole dans les ‘Choéphores’,” Cahiers du GITA 10: 155–89Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1965. “The Motif of the Corrupted Sacrifice in Aeschylus’ Oresteia,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 96: 463–508Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1978. “The Dynamics of Misogyny: Myth and Mythmaking in the Oresteia of Aeschylus,” Arethusa 11: 149–84Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1982. Under the Sign of the Shield: Semiotics and Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes, RomeGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1990a. “Patterns of Gender in Aeschylean Drama: Seven Against Thebes and the Danaid Trilogy,” in Griffith, M., and Mastronarde, D.J. (eds), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer (Atlanta, GA), 103–15Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1990b. “Thebes: Theater of Self and Society in Athenian Drama,” in Winkler, J.J., and Zeitlin, F. (eds), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in its Social Context (Princeton), 130–67Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 1992. “The Politics of Eros in the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” in Hexter, R., and Selden, D. (eds), Innovations of Antiquity (London), 203–52Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. 2012. “A Study in Form: Recognition Scenes in the Three Electra Plays,” Lexis 30: 361–78Google Scholar