Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: May 2010

15 - Stroke units and clinical assessment

from Section IV - Therapeutic strategies and neurorehabilitation

Summary

Introduction

There is strong evidence that treatment of stroke patients in stroke units significantly reduces death, dependency and need for institutional care compared to treatment in general medical wards [1]. An acute stroke unit is one of the key elements in the critical pathway and the chain of recovery of acute stroke patients.

Only stroke unit care, thrombolytic therapy and hemicraniectomy have been shown to improve the outcome of stroke patients. The acute therapies and interventions in stroke are described in Chapter 16. The basic functions of the stroke unit, mainly covered in other chapters of this book, are etiological diagnostic work-up (Chapters 2–4 and 7–13), general management and proactive prevention of complications (Chapters 17 and 18), secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular endpoints (Chapter 19), and early rehabilitation (Chapter 20).

The purpose of this chapter is to characterize the chain of recovery of acute stroke patients from emergency phone call to acute stroke unit, including clinical evaluation of the patient and aspects of general stroke management that can be optimally delivered in stroke units, in light of current guidelines.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
,Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration: Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; CD000197.
,European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee; ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25(5):457–507.
Kothari, R, Jauch, E, Broderick, J, et al. Acute stroke: delays to presentation and emergency department evaluation. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33(1):3–8.
Schroeder, EB, Rosamond, WD, Morris, DL, et al. Determinants of use of emergency medical services in a population with stroke symptoms: the second delay in accessing stroke healthcare (dash ii) study. Stroke 2000; 31:2591–6.
Morris, DL, Rosamond, W, Madden, K, et al. Prehospital and emergency department delays after acute stroke: the Genentech Stroke Presentation Survey. Stroke 2000; 31(11):2585–90.
Kwan, J, Hand, P, Sandercock, P. A systematic review of barriers to delivery of thrombolysis for acute stroke. Age Ageing 2004; 33:116–21.
Kothari, R, Barsan, W, Brott, T, et al. Frequency and accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute stroke. Stroke 1995; 26(6):937–41.
Kothari, RU, Pancioli, A, Liu, T, et al. Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale: reproducibility and validity. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33(4):373–8.
Nor, A, Mc Allister, C, Louw, S, et al. Agreement between ambulance paramedic – and physician –recorded neurological signs using the Face Arm Speech Test (FAST) in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2004; 35:1355–9.
Kidwell, CS, Starkman, S, Eckstein, M, et al. Identifying stroke in the field. Prospective validation of the Los Angeles prehospital stroke screen (LAPSS). Stroke 2000; 31(1):71–6.
Bray, JE, Martin, J, Cooper, G, et al. Paramedic identification of stroke: community validation of the Melbourne ambulance stroke screen. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20(1):28–33.
Belvis, R, Cocho, D, Martí-Fàbregas, J, et al. Benefits of a prehospital stroke code system. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 19(2):96–101.
Gomez, CR, Malkoff, MD, Sauer, CM, et al. Code stroke. An attempt to shorten inhospital therapeutic delays. Stroke 1994; 25(10):1920–3.
Nor, AM, Davis, J, Sen, B, et al. The Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale: development and validation of a stroke recognition instrument. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4(11):727–34.
Morgenstern, LB, et al. Improving delivery of acute stroke therapy: The TLL Temple Foundation Stroke Project. Stroke 2002; 33(1):160–6.
Lindsberg, PJ, Häppölä, O, Kallela, M, et al. Door to thrombolysis: ER reorganization and reduced delays to acute stroke treatment. Neurology 2006; 67(2):334–6.
Audebert, H, Schenkel, J, Heuschmann, P, et al. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria, Germany. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5:742–8.
Hess, DC, Wang, S, Gross, H, et al. Telestroke: extending stroke expertise into underserved areas. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5(3):275–8.
Alberts, MJ, Hademenos, G, Latchaw, RE, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. Brain Attack Coalition. JAMA 2000; 283(23):3102–9.
Acker, JE 3rd, Pancioli, AM, Crocco, TJ, et al. American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Expert Panel on Emergency Medical Services Systems, Stroke Council. Implementation strategies for emergency medical services within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Expert Panel on Emergency Medical Services Systems and the Stroke Council. Stroke 2007; 38(11):3097–115.
Adams, HP, del Zoppo, G, Alberts, MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups. Stroke 2007; 38(5):1655–711.
Broderick, J, Connolly, S, Feldmann, E, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Stroke 2007; 38(6):2001–23.
Langhorne, P, Dennis, M. Stroke Units: an evidence based approach. London: BMJ Books; 1999.
Leys, D, Ringelstein, E, Kaste, M, Hacke, W, and the Executive Committee of the European Stroke Initiative. Facilities Available in European Hospitals Treating Stroke Patients. Stroke 2007; 38(11):2985–91.
Seenan, P, Long, M, Langhorne, P. Stroke units in their natural habitat. Systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2007; 38(6):1886–92.
Langhorne, P, Dey, P, Woodman, M, et al. Is stroke unit care portable? A systematic review of the clinical trials. Age Aging 2005; 34(4):324–30.
Asplund, K, Indredavik, B. Stroke units and stroke teams: evidence-based management of stroke. In: Castillo, J, Davalos, A, Toni, D, eds. Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Barcelona: Springer Verlag Iberica; 1997: 3–15.
Leys, D, Ringelstein, EB, Kaste, M, et al. for the European Stroke Initiative executive committee. The main components of stroke unit care: results of a European Expert survey. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23(5–6):344–52.
Aboderin, I, Venables, G, for the Pan European Consensus Meeting. Stroke management in Europe. J Intern Med 1996; 240(4):173–80.
Kjellström, T, Norrving, B, Shatchkute, A. Helsingborg Declaration 2006 on European stroke strategies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23(2–3):231–41.
Govan, L, Langhorne, P, Weir, CJ, for the Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Does the prevention of complications explain the survival benefit of organized inpatient (Stroke Unit) care? Further analysis of a systematic review. Stroke 2007; 38(9):2536–40.
Vahedi, K, Hofmeijer, J, Juettler, E, et al. for DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6(3):215–22.
Alberts, MJ, Latchaw, RE, Selman, WR, et al. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement of the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke 2005; 36(7):1597–616.
Sulter, G, Elting, JW, Langedijk, M, et al. Admitting acute ischemic stroke patients to a stroke care monitoring unit versus a conventional stroke unit: a randomized pilot study. Stroke 2003; 34:101–4.