Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:14:01.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Psychiatric epidemiology and its contributions to cultural psychiatry

from Part II - Culture and mental health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

Robert Kohn
Affiliation:
Butler Hospital 345 Blackstone Blvd Providence RI 02906 USA
Kamaldeep Bhui
Affiliation:
Department of Cultural Psychiatry and Epidemiology Institute of Community Health Sciences Queen Mary London E1 4NS UK
Dinesh Bhugra
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Kamaldeep Bhui
Affiliation:
Barts & The London, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry
Get access

Summary

EDITORS' INTRODUCTION

The relationship between cultural psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology is of constructive tension. Although in certain fields of cultural psychiatry epidemiology studies are problematic because of small numbers, the basic premise of epidemiology can be employed provided the interpretation of the findings is clearly contextualized. The measurement of psychopathology across cultures using the same set of tools is fraught with major difficulties. The category fallacy under these circumstances raises critical questions. It is also of interest that often these assessment tools move from Euro-US centric settings to the rest of the world, rather than the other way around.

Kohn and Bhui examine the contribution of psychiatric epidemiology to cultural psychiatry, and some controversial questions. They argue that psychiatric epidemiology has evolved since the study by Jarvis in 1855 in which higher rates of mental illness were found among the Irish immigrants in the pauper classes in Massachusetts, USA. Since then, psychiatric epidemiology has undergone at least three generations of evolution, followed most recently by the fourth stage from which cultural epidemiology has emerged as the a new branch of epidemiology, taking in perspectives from medical anthropology, epidemiology and public health. The implications of these changes are tremendous, both for clinicians and researchers.

Introduction

The methodological advances of psychiatric epidemiology revealed the limitations of earlier psychiatric research. These critiques had implications for the use of diagnostic instruments, and for the methodological advances needed to study cultures and compare mental-health problems in diverse cultural groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alem, A., Kebede, D., Woldesemiat, G., Jacobsson, L. & Kullgren, G. (1999). The prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of mental distress in Butajira, Ethiopia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum, 397, 48–55.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1952). Mental Disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Andrade, L., Caraveo-Anduaga, J. J., Berglund, P.et al. (2003). The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: results from the International Consortium of Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE) surveys. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12, 3–21.Google Scholar
Bhui, K., Mohamud, S., Warfa, N., Craig, T. J. & Stansfeld, S. A. (2003). Cultural adaptation of mental health measures: improving the quality of clinical practice and research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 184–186.Google Scholar
Bjil, R. V., Graff, R., Hiripi, E.et al. (2003). The prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders in five countries. Health Affairs, 22, 122–133.Google Scholar
Blazer, D., Hughes, D. C. & George, L. K. (1987). The epidemiology of depression in an elderly community population. Gerontologist, 27, 281–287.Google Scholar
Canino, G., Lewis-Fernandez, R. & Bravo, M. (1997). Methodological challenges in cross-cultural mental health research. Transcultural Psychiatry, 34, 163–184.Google Scholar
Cohen, P. & Cohen, J. (1984). The clinician's illusion. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 1178–1182.Google Scholar
Jong, J. T. & Ommeren, M. (2002). Toward a culture-informed epidemiology: combing qualitative and quantitative research in transcultural contexts. Transcultural Psychiatry, 39, 422–433.Google Scholar
Dohrenwend, B. P. & Dohrenwend, B. S. (1974). Social and cultural influences on psychopathology. Annual Review of Psychology, 25, 417–452.Google Scholar
Dohrenwend, B. P. & Dohrenwend, B. S. (1982). Perspective on the past and future of psychiatric epidemiology. The Rema Lapouse Lecture. American Journal of Public Health, 72, 1271–1279.Google Scholar
Dohrenwend, B. P., Levav, I., Shrout, P. E.et al. (1992). Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science, 255, 946–952.Google Scholar
Egeland, J. A. & Hostetter, A. M. (1983). Amish Study, I: affective disorders among the Amish, 1976–1980. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 56–61.Google Scholar
Endicott, J. & Spitzer, R. L. (1978). A diagnostic interview: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 837–844.Google Scholar
Fabrega, H. Jr. (1994). International systems of diagnosis in psychiatry. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 182, 256–263.Google Scholar
Flaherty, J. A., Kohn, R., Levav, I. & Birz, S. (1988a). Demoralization in Soviet-Jewish immigrants to the United States and Israel. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 29, 588–597.Google Scholar
Flaherty, J. A., Gaviria, F. M., Pathak, D.et al. (1988b). Developing instruments for cross-cultural psychiatric research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 257–263.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. M. & Morrison, S. L. (1963). Schizophrenia and social class. British Journal of Psychiatry, 109, 785–802.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Rickels, K., Downing, R. & Hesbacher, P. (1976). A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 61–67.Google Scholar
Hendrie, H. C., Osuntokun, B. O., Hall, K. S.et al. (1995). Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and dementia in two communities: Nigerian Africans and African Americans. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1485–1492.Google Scholar
Hwu, H. G., Yeh, E. K. & Chang, L. Y. (1989). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 79, 136–147.Google Scholar
Jablensky, A., Sartorius, N., Ernberg, G. et al. (1992). Schizophrenia: manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. A World Health Organization Ten-Country Study. Psychological Medicine, monograph supplement, 20.
Jarvis, E. (1971). Insanity and Idiocy in Massachusetts: Report of the Commission of Lunacy (1855). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Kessler, R. C. (1999). The World Health Organization International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE): initial work and future directions – the NAPE Lecture 1998. Nordic Association for Psychiatric Epidemiology. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 99, 2–9.Google Scholar
Kirkbride, J. B., Fearon, P., Morgan, C.et al. (2006). Heterogeneity in the incidence rates of schizophrenia and other psychotic syndromes: findings from the 3-center AeSOP study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(3), 250–258.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1977). Depression, somatization and the new cross-cultural psychiatry. Social Science and Medicine, 11, 3–10.Google Scholar
Kleinman, A. (1988). Rethinking Psychiatry: From Cultural Category to Personal Experience. New York: Free Press.
Kohn, R., Levav, I., Dohrenwend, B. P., Shrout, P. E. & Skodol, A. E. (1997). Jews and their intraethnic vulnerability to affective disorders, fact or artifact? II: evidence from a cohort study. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 34, 149–156.Google Scholar
Kohn, R., Dohrenwend, B. P. & Mirotznik, J. (1998). Epidemiologic findings on selected psychiatric disorders in the general population. In Adversity, Stress, and Psychopathology, ed. Dohrenwend, B. P.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–284.
Kohn, R., Saxena, S., Levav, I. & Saraceno, B. (2004). The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82, 858–866.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. C., Harding, J. S., Macklin, D. B., Hughes, C. C. & Leighton, A. H. (1963a). Psychiatric findings of the Stirling County Study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 1021–1026.Google Scholar
Leighton, A. H., Lambo, T., Hughes, J. M., Leighton, D. C., Murphy, J. & Maclin, D. (1963b). Psychiatric Disorders Among the Yoruba. Ithaca, New York: Cornell-University Press.
Levav, I. (1998). Individuals under conditions of maximum adversity: The Holocaust. In Adversity, Stress, and Psychopathology, ed. Dohrenwend, B. P.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–33.
Levav, I., Kohn, R., Dohrenwend, B. P.et al. (1993). An epidemiologic study of mental disorders in a 10-year cohort of young adults in Israel. Psychological Medicine, 23, 691–707.Google Scholar
Levav, I., Kohn, R., Golding, J. & Weissman, M. M. (1997). Vulnerability of Jews to affective disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 941–947.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. & Pelosi, A. J. (1990). Manual of the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R). London: MRC Institute of Psychiatry.
Lin, T. (1953). A study of the incidence of mental disorder in Chinese and other cultures. Psychiatry, 16, 313–336.Google Scholar
Ibor, Lopez J. J. Jr. (2003). Cultural adaptations of current psychiatric classifications: are they the solution?Psychopathology, 36, 114–119.Google Scholar
Mezzich, J. E., Fabrega, H. Jr. & Kleinman, A. (1992). Cultural validity and DSM-IV. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 180, 4.Google Scholar
Mollica, R. F., Sarajlic, N., Chernoff, M., Lavelle, J., Vukovic, I. S. & Massagli, M. P. (2001). Longitudinal study of psychiatric symptoms, disability, mortality, and emigration among Bosnian refugees. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 546–554.Google Scholar
North, C. S., Nixon, S. J., Shariat, S.et al. (1999). Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 755–762.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Helzer, J. E., Croughan, J. & Ratcliff, K. S. (1981). National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics, and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 381–389.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N., Wing, J., Wittchen, H. U.et al. (1988). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1069–1077.Google Scholar
Romanoski, A. J. & Chahal, R. (1981). The Standardized Psychiatric Examination. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Sartorius, N. & Kuyken, W. (1994). Translation of health status instruments. In Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives, ed. Orley, J. & Kuyken, W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3–18.
Selten, J. P., Veen, N., Feller, W.et al. (2001). Incidence of psychotic disorders in immigrant groups to the Netherlands. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 367–372.Google Scholar
Sharpley, M. S., Hutchinson, G., Murray, R. M. & McKenzie, K. (2001). Understanding the excess of psychosis among the African-Caribbean population in England: review of current hypotheses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178 (Suppl. 40), 60–68.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., Dohrenwend, B. P. & Levav, I. (1986). A discriminant rule for screening cases of diverse diagnostic types: preliminary results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 314–319.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1978). Research diagnostic criteria: Rationale and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 773–782.Google Scholar
Srole, L., Langer, T. S., Michael, S. T., Opler, M. K. & Rennie, T. A. (1962). Mental Health in the Metropolis: The Midtown Manhattan Study. New York: McGraw Hill.
Tseng, W. S. (2001). Handbook of Cultural Psychiatry. San Diego, California: Academic Press, pp. 195–209.
Ustun, B., Compton, W., Mager, D.et al. (1997). WHO Study on the reliability and validity of the alcohol and drug use disorder instruments: overview of methods and results. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 47, 161–169.Google Scholar
Vega, W. A., Kolody, B., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Aldrete, E. & Catalano, R. (1998). Lifetime prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders among rural and urban Mexican Americans in California. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 771–782.Google Scholar
Wang, C. H., Liu, W. T., Zhang, M. Y. et al. (1992). Alcohol use, abuse, and dependency in Shanghai. In Alcoholism in North America, Europe, and Asia, ed. Helzer, J. E. & Canino, C. J.. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 264–286.
Weiss, M. G. (2001). Cultural epidemiology: an introduction and overview. Anthropology and Medicine, 8, 1–29.Google Scholar
Weissman, M. M., Bland, R. C., Canino, G. J.et al. (1997). The cross-national epidemiology of panic disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 305–309.Google Scholar
Wing, J. H., Nixon, J., Mann, S. A. & Leff, J. P. (1977). Reliability of the PSE (ninth edition) used in a population survey. Psychological Medicine, 7, 505–516.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Babor, T., Brugha, T.et al. (1990). SCAN: schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 589–593.Google Scholar
Wittchen, H. U. (1994). Reliability and validity studies of the WHO – Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 28, 57–84.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1978). Mental Disorders: Glossary and Guide to their Classification in Accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Health Organization (2001). The World Health Report 2001 Mental Health: New Understanding New Hope. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/whr2001/
World Mental Health Survey Consortium (2004). Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health surveys. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2581–2590.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×