Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:56:12.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Teledermatology modalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2009

Hon S. Pak
Affiliation:
Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA
Karen E. Edison
Affiliation:
Department of Dermatology and Missouri Telehealth Network, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
John D. Whited
Affiliation:
Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Hon S. Pak
Affiliation:
Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
Karen E. Edison
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
John D. Whited
Affiliation:
Duke University Medical Center, Durham
Get access

Summary

There are three major teledermatology modalities. Live-interactive and store-and-forward are the two most common modalities with the hybrid model that includes elements of both live-interactive and store-and-forward technologies emerging as the third new modality. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages and selection is based on the needs of the organization, the dermatology resources available, the teledermatology visit and/or consult volume, existing communication infrastructure, and the objectives of the program.

Live-interactive teledermatology

Live-interactive teledermatology takes advantage of videoconferencing as its core technology. Participants are separated by distance, but interact in real time. Thus, live-interactive patient visits are also known as synchronous visits or consults. By convention, the site where the patient is located is referred to as the originating site and the site where the consultant is located is referred to as the distant site. A high-resolution camera or monitor is required at the originating site. Videoconferencing systems work optimally when a connection speed of 384 kbps or higher is used. Slower connection speeds may necessitate that the individual presenting the patient perform either a still-image capture or a freeze-frame to render a diagnostic image. For most diagnostic images, a minimum resolution of 800 × 600 pixels (480,000) is required.

Live-interactive interactions are initiated similar to in-person dermatological care. Patients may make their own teledermatology appointments or a referring provider may request the visit. A live-interactive appointment is scheduled in a manner similar to that of conventional clinic-based visits.

Type
Chapter
Information
Teledermatology
A User's Guide
, pp. 5 - 8
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Teledermatology modalities
    • By Hon S. Pak, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA, Karen E. Edison, Department of Dermatology and Missouri Telehealth Network, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA, John D. Whited, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Edited by Hon S. Pak, Karen E. Edison, University of Missouri, Columbia, John D. Whited, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
  • Book: Teledermatology
  • Online publication: 29 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511547386.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Teledermatology modalities
    • By Hon S. Pak, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA, Karen E. Edison, Department of Dermatology and Missouri Telehealth Network, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA, John D. Whited, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Edited by Hon S. Pak, Karen E. Edison, University of Missouri, Columbia, John D. Whited, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
  • Book: Teledermatology
  • Online publication: 29 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511547386.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Teledermatology modalities
    • By Hon S. Pak, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, Fort Detrick, Maryland, USA, Karen E. Edison, Department of Dermatology and Missouri Telehealth Network, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA, John D. Whited, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Edited by Hon S. Pak, Karen E. Edison, University of Missouri, Columbia, John D. Whited, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
  • Book: Teledermatology
  • Online publication: 29 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511547386.002
Available formats
×