References

Ian Roberts; Anna Roussou

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486326.007

Abney, S. 1987. ‘The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect’, PhD diss., MIT

Abraham, W. 1997. ‘The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the verbal genitive’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–61

Acquaviva, P. 1996, ‘Negation in Irish and the representation of monotone decreasing quantifiers’, in R. Borsley and I. Roberts (eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages, Cambridge University Press, pp. 284–313

Adams, M. 1987. ‘From Old French to the theory of pro-drop’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5:1–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Agouraki, Y. 1990. ‘On the projection of maximal categories: the case of CP and FP in Modern Greek’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2:183–200Google Scholar

Agouraki, Y. 1991. ‘A Modern Greek complementizer and its significance for UG’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3:1–24Google Scholar

Agouraki, Y. 2001. ‘The position of clitics in Cypriot Greek’, in A. Ralli, B. Joseph, and M. Janse (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, University of Patras, pp. 1–18

Aissen, J. and D. Perlmutter. 1983. ‘Clause reduction in Spanish’, in D. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1, University of Chicago Press, pp. 360–403

Alexiadou, A. 1997, Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E.. 1998. ‘Parameterizing AGR: word order, Ⅴ-movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16:491–539CrossRef Google Scholar

Alexiadou, A. and Fanselow, G.. 2001. ‘Laws of diachrony as a source for syntactic generalizations: the case of Ⅴ to Ⅰ’, GLOW Newsletter 46:57–58Google Scholar

Andriotis, N. P. 1983. Etymologiko Lexiko tis Koinis Neoellinikis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Institute of Modern Greek Studies. Reprint 1990

Aoun, J. and A. Li. 1993. The Syntax of Scope, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Arad, M. and A. Roussou. 1997. ‘Particles and C-positions in Classical Greek’, ms., University College London and University of Wales, Bangor

Bach, E. 1971. ‘Questions’, Linguistic Inquiry 2:153–166Google Scholar

Baker, M. 1989. ‘Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 20:513–554Google Scholar

Bânescu, N. 1915. Die Entwincklung des griechischen Futurums von der frühbyza-ntinischen Zeit bis zur Gegenwart, Bucharest: Königliche Hofbuchdruckerei F. Göbl Söhne

Barwise, J. and Cooper, R.. 1981. ‘Generalized quantifiers and natural language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159–219CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassols de Climent, M. 1948. Sintaxis historica de la lengua latina, Ⅱ: Las formas personales del verbo, Barcelona: Escuela de Filologia

Batllori, M. and F. Roca. 2001. ‘The value of definite determiners from Old Spanish to Modern Spanish’, in S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, pp. 241–254

Battistella, E. 1991. ‘The treatment of negation in double modal constructions’, Linguistic Analysis 21:49–65Google Scholar

Belletti, A. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement, Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier

Belletti, A. 1999. ‘Inversion as focalisation’, ms., University of Siena

Benincà, P. 1994. La variazione sintattica: Studi di dialettologia romanza, Bologna: Ⅱ Mulino

Benincà, P. 1995. ‘Complement clitics in Medieval Romance: the Tobler-Mussafia law’, in A. Battye and I. Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, pp. 325–344

Benincà, P. and C. Poletto. 1997. ‘The diachronic development of a modal verb of necessity’, in A. van kemenede and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–118

Benincà, P. and Vanelli, L.. 1975. ‘Morfologia del verbo friulano: il presente indicativo’, Lingua e contesto 1:1–62Google Scholar

Benincà, P. and L. Vanelli 1982. ‘Appunti di sintassi veneta’, in M. Cortelazzo (ed.), Guida ai dialetti veneti, vol. Ⅳ, Padova: CLEUP, pp. 7–38. Reprinted in P. Benincà 1994, La variazione sintattica: Studi di dialettologia romanza, Bologna: Ⅱ Mulino, pp. 29–68

Bennis, H. 2000. ‘On the interpretation of functional categories’, in H. Bennis, M. Everaert and E. Reuland (eds.), Interface Strategies, Amsterdam: KNAW Publications, pp. 21–36

Benveniste, E. 1968. ‘Mutations of linguistic categories’, in W. Lehmann and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 83–94

Bernstein, J. 1991. ‘DPs in French and Walloon: evidence for parametric variation in nominal head movement’, Probus 3:1–26CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. 2001. ‘The DP hypothesis: identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain’, in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 536–561

Besten, H. den. 1983. ‘On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules’, in W. Abraham (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47–131

Beths, F. 1999. ‘The history of dare and the status of unidirectionality’, Linguistics 37:1069–1110CrossRef Google Scholar

Beukema, F. and W. van der Wurff. 2002. ‘Modals, objects and negation in Late Middle English’, in S. Barbiers, F. Beukema and W. van der Wurff (eds.), Modality and its Interaction with the Verbal System, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 75–102

Bianchi, V. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Bianchi, V. 2000. ‘The raising analysis of relative clauses: a reply to Borsley’, Linguistic Inquiry 31:123–140CrossRef Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1991. Language and Species, University of Chicago Press

Blass, F., A. Debrunner and R. Funk. 1961. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, University of Chicago Press

Bobaljik, J. 2000. ‘The implication of rich agreement: why morphology does not drive syntax’, GLOW Newsletter 46:28–29Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. 1972. Degree Words, The Hague: Mouton

Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax, Dordrecht: Foris

Borsley, R. 1997. ‘Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 28:629–647Google Scholar

Bourciez, E. 1967. Eléments de linguistique romane, Paris: Klincksieck

Brandi, L. and P. Cordin. 1989. ‘Two Italian dialects and the null-subject parameter’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 111–142

Bresnan, J. 1972. ‘Theory of complementation in English syntax’, PhD diss., MIT

Brody, M. 1995. Lexico-Logical Form, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Brody, M. 1997. ‘Perfect chains’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 139–167

Brown, K. 1992, ‘Double modals in Hawick Scots’, in P. Trudgill and J. K. Chambers (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, London: Longman, pp. 74–103

Browning, R. 1983 (2nd edition). Medieval and Modern Greek, Cambridge University Press

Brugè, L. 1994. ‘Aspetti della struttura dei nominali nelle lingue romanze’, PhD diss., University of Padua

Brugmann, K. 1893–1894. Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff der Totalität in den Indogermanischen Sprachen: eine semasiologisch-etymologische Untersuchung, Leipzig: Edelmann

Bullock, B. 1991. ‘The mora and the syllable as prosodic licensers in the lexicon’, PhD diss., Stanford University

Bybee, J., R. D. Perkins and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World, University of Chicago Press

Calabrese, A. 1993. ‘The sentential complementation of Salentino: a study of a language without infinitival clauses’, in A. Belletti (ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier, pp. 28–98

Callaway, M. 1913. The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon, Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution

Campbell, A. 1959. Old English Grammar, Oxford University Press

Cardinaletti, A. 1994. ‘Subject positions’, GenGenP 2:64–78Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. 1997. ‘Subjects and clause structure’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, London: Longman, pp. 33–63

Cardinaletti, A. and G. Giusti. 2002. ‘Quantifiers as lexical categories,’ paper presented at the ⅩⅩⅤⅢ Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Lecce, 28 February–2 March 2002

Cardinaletti, A. and Starke, M.. 1995. ‘Deficient pronouns’, GenGenP 3:22–49Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, A. and M. Starke 1999. ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns’, in H. Van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145–234

Carlson, G. 1981. ‘Reference to kinds in English’, PhD diss., University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Castillo, J. C. J. Drury and Grohmann, K.. 1999. ‘Merge over Move and the Extended Projection Principle’, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 8:63–103Google Scholar

Chatzidakis, G. 1905. Mesaionika kai Nea Ellinka, vol Ⅰ. Reprint 1989, Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert

Cheng, L. 1991. ‘On the typology of wh-questions’, PhD diss., MIT

Chila-Markopoulou, D. 2000. ‘The indefinite article in Greek: a diachronic approach’, Glossologia 11–12: 111–130Google Scholar

Chila-Markopoulou, D. 2001, ‘Thelo na … alla dhen tha: phenomena of grammaticalisation and modal multiple use’ [in Greek], in Studies in Greek Linguistics 21, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 822–833

Chomsky, N. 1970. ‘Remarks on nominalizations’, in R. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), English Transformational Grammar, Waltham, MA: Ginn, pp. 184–221

Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris

Chomsky, N. 1986a. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins and Use, New York: Praeger

Chomsky, N. 1986b. Barriers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. 1991. ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, in R. Friedin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 417–454

Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, N. 2000. ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, in R. Martin, D. Michael and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–155

Chomsky, N. 2001. ‘Derivation by phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52

Christidis, A. Ph. 1985. ‘The deictic na’ [in Greek], in Studies in Greek Linguistics 6. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 221–241

Christidis, A. Ph. 1986. ‘The morpheme pu as a definite clause nominalizer’ [in Greek], in Studies in Greek Linguistics 7, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 135–148

Christidis, A. Ph. 1989. ‘Particles’ [in Greek], in Studies in Greek Linguistics 10, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 307–322

Cinque, G. 1991. Types of A’-Dependencies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Cinque, G. 1994. ‘On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’, in G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, Georgetown University Press, pp. 85–110

Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and the Universal Hierarchy of Functional Projections, Oxford University Press

Cinque, G. 2001. ‘“Restructuring” and the order of aspectual and root modals’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 137–153

Clark, R. 1990. Papers on Learnability and Natural Selection, Technical Reports on Formal and Computational Linguistics, 1, Université de Genève

Clark, R. and Roberts, I.. 1993. ‘A computational model of language learnability and language change’, Linguisitic Inquiry 24:299–345Google Scholar

Clark, R. and I. Roberts 1994. ‘On complexity as the engine of variation’, ms., Universities of Pennsylvania and Bangor

Collins, C. 1993. ‘Argument sharing in serial verb constructions’, Linguistic Inquiry 28:461–497Google Scholar

Cormack, A. and Smith, N.. 1994. ‘Serial verbs’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6:63–88Google Scholar

Cormack, A. and Smith, N. 1999. ‘Where is a sign merged?’ GLOT 4/6: 20Google Scholar

Cormack, A. and N. Smith 2000. ‘Head movement and negation in English’, in P. Rowlett (ed.), Transactions of the Philological Society: Special Number, Papers from the Salford Negation Conference 1998, 1:49–85

Cottell, S. 1995. ‘The representation of Tense in Modern Irish’, GenGenP 3:105–124Google Scholar

Croft, W. 1990. Typology and Universals, Cambridge University Press

Culicover, P. 1976. Syntax, New York: Academic Press

Damonte, F. 2002, ‘The syntax and semantics of Salentino ku’, paper presented at the ⅩⅩⅧ Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Lecce, 28 February–2 March 2002

Davidson, D. 1968. ‘On saying that’, Synthese 19:130–146. Reprint 1997 in P. Ludlow (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 817–832

Davis, S. 2000. ‘Identifying agreement’, GLOW Newsletter 44:68–69Google Scholar

Déchaine, R. 1993. ‘Serial verb constructions’, in J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 799–825

Déchaine, R. and Tremblay, M.. 1998. ‘On category features’, GLOW Newsletter 40:26–27Google Scholar

Delbrück, B. 1893, 1897, 1900. Vergleichende Syntax der Indogermanischen Sprachen (vols. 3–5 of K. Brugmann and B. Delbrück (1886–1900) Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen), Strasbourg: Trübner

Denison, D. 1985. ‘The origins of periphrastic do: Ellegård and Visser reconsidered’, in R. Eaton et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, April 10–13, 1985, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–60

Denison, D. 1990. ‘Aux + impersonal in Old English’, Folia Linguistica Historica 9:139–166Google Scholar

Denison, D. 1993. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions, London: Longman

Déprez, V. 1997. ‘Two types of negative concord’, Probus 10:1–85CrossRef Google Scholar

Déprez, V. 1999. ‘The roots of negative concord in French lexifier Creoles’, in M. deGraff (ed.), Language Creation and Language Change: Creoles, Diachrony and Development, Cambridge, MA: MlT Press, pp. 375–427

Déprez, V. 2000. ‘Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18:253–342CrossRef Google Scholar

Diesing, M. 1992. Indefinites, Cambridge, MA, MlT Press

Dikken, M. and Sybesma, R.. 1998. ‘Take serials light up the middle’, GLOW Newsletter 40:30–31Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 2001. ‘Head-to-head merge in Balkan subjunctives and Locality’, in M. L. Rivero and A. Ralli (eds.), Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, Oxford University Press, pp. 44–73

Donohue, M. 1995. ‘The Tuking Besi language of Southeast Sulawesi’, PhD diss., Australian National University

Drachman, G. 1994. ‘Verb movement and minimal clauses’, in I. Philippaki-Warburton, K. Nicolaidis and M. Sifianou (eds.), Themes in Greek Linguistics (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–52

Dresher, E. 1999. ‘Charting the learning path: cues to parameter setting’, Linguistic Inquiry 30:27–68CrossRef Google Scholar

Emonds, J. 1970. ‘Root, structure-preserving and local transformations’, PhD diss., MIT

Emonds, J. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-Preserving and Local Transformations, New York: Academic Press

Enç, M. 1987. ‘Anchoring conditions for tense’, Linguistic Inquiry 8:633–657Google Scholar

Ernout, A. and F. Thomas. 1953. Syntaxe latine, Paris: Klincksieck

Evers, A. 1975. ‘The transformational cycle in Dutch and German’, PhD diss., University of Utrecht [distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club]

Farkas, D. 1992. ‘On obviation’, in I. Sag and A. Szabolsci (eds.), Lexical Matters, Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 85–109

Ferraresi, G. 1991. ‘Die Stellung des gotischen Verbs im Lichte eines Vergleichs mit dem Althochdeutschen’, MA thesis, University of Venice

Ferraresi, G. 1997. ‘Word order and phrase structure in Gothic’, PhD diss., University of Stuttgart

Fintel, K. 1995. ‘The formal semantics of grammaticalization’, NELS 25:175–189Google Scholar

Fischer, O., A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman and W. van der Wurff. 2000. The Syntax of Early English, Cambridge University Press

Fleischman, S. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance, Cambridge University Press

Fodor, J. 1998. ‘Unambiguous triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 29:1–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Fontana, J. 1993. ‘Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish’, PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania (IRCS Report No. 93–24)

Foulet, L. 1990. Petite syntaxe de l'ancien français. Paris: Champion

Garrett, A. 1990. ‘The syntax of Anatolian pronominal clitics’, PhD diss., Harvard University

Giannakidou, A. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non-)Veridical Dependency, Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Giannakidou, A. 2000. ‘Negative … concord?’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18:457–523CrossRef Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 2001. ‘Free choice is not universal quantification’, in Y. Agouraki, A. Arvaniti, J. Davy et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, pp. 251–258

Gibson, E. and Wexler, K.. 1994. ‘Triggers’, Linguistic Inquiry 25:407–454Google Scholar

Gimson, A. 1980. An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English, London: Arnold

Giorgi, A. and G. Pianesi. 1997. Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax, Oxford University Press

Giusti, G. 1993. La sintassi dei determinanti, Padua: Unipress

Giusti, G. 1997. ‘The categorial status of determiners’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 95–123

Giusti, G. 2001. ‘The birth of a functional category: from Latin ILLE to the Romance article and personal pronoun’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 157–171

Goodwin, W. 1894. A Greek Grammar, London: Macmillan. Reprint 1992, Nelson St Martin's Press

Goodwin, W. 1897. Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, London: Macmillan

Görlach, M. 1991. Early Modern English, Cambridge University Press

Gray, D. 1985. The Oxford Book of Late Medieval Prose and Verse, Oxford University Press

Greenberg, J. 1966. ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 73–113

Grimes, E. 1991. ‘The Buru language of Eastern Indonesia’, PhD diss., Australian National University

Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Grimshaw, J. 1997. ‘Projection, heads and optimality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28:373–422Google Scholar

Grohmann. K. 2000. ‘Prolific peripheries: a radical view from the left’, PhD thesis, University of Maryland

Haegeman, L. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West Flemish, Cambridge University Press

Haegeman, L. 1995. The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press

Haegeman, L. 1999. ‘Embedded verb positions and remnant movement in the West Germanic SOV languages’, ms., University of Geneva

Haegeman, L. 2002. ‘Speculations on adjunct fronting and the left periphery’, ms., Université Charles de Gaulle Lille Ⅲ

Hale, M. 1987. ‘Wackernagel's Law in the language of the Rigveda’, PhD thesis, Harvard University

Hale, K. and J. Keyser. 1993. ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations’, in K. Hale and J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 53–109

Harris, A. and L. Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Cambridge University Press

Harris, M. 1978. The Evolution of French Syntax: A Comparative Approach, London: Longman

Harris, M. 1980. ‘The marking of definiteness in Romance’, in J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 141–156

Harris, M. and N. Vincent. 1988. The Romance Languages, London: Routledge

Haspelmath, M. 1989. ‘From purposive to infinitive – a universal path of grammaticalization’, Folia Linguistica Historica 10/1–2:287–310Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1995. ‘Diachronic sources of “all” and “every”’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer and B. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 363–382

Haspelmath, M. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns, Oxford University Press

Hawkins, J. 1983, Word Order Universals, New York: Academic Press

Haeberli, E. 1999. ‘Features, categories and the syntax of A-positions: synchronic and diachronic variation in the Germanic languages’, PhD diss., University of Geneva

Heim, I. 1982. ‘The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases’, PhD diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Heine, H., U. Claudi, and F. Hünnemeyer. 1991, Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework, University of Chicago Press

Heine, H. and T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalisation, Cambridge University Press

Heine, H. and M. Reh. 1994. Patterns of Grammaticalization in African Languages. AKUP 47 (Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts). Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Cologne

Henry, A. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting, Oxford University Press

Higginbotham, J. 1985. ‘On semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16:547–593Google Scholar

Hoeksema, J. 2001. ‘Rapid change among expletive polarity items’, in Laurel J. Binton (ed.), Historical Linguistic 1999. Selected Papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistic, Vancouver, 9–13 August 1999, Amsterdam and Philodelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 175–186

Holton, D. 1993. ‘The formation of the future in Modern Greek literary texts up to the 17th century’, in N. M. Panayiotakis (ed.), Origini delle letteratura neogreca. The Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference ‘Neograeca Medii Aevi’, vol. Ⅰ, Venice, pp. 118–128

Holton, D., P. Mackridge and I. Philippaki-Warburton. 1997. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London and New York: Routledge

Hopper, P. and E. Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization, Cambridge University Press

Horn, L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation, University of Chicago Press

Horn, L. 2000. ‘Pick a theory (not just any theory): indiscriminatives and the free-choice indefinite’, in L. Horn and Y. Kato (eds.), Negation and Polarity, Oxford University Press, pp. 115–146

Hornstein, N. 1999. ‘Movement and control’, Linguistic Inquiry 30:69–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Horrocks, G. 1997. Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers, London: Longman

Horrocks, G. and Stavrou, M.. 1987. ‘Bounding theory and Greek syntax: evidence for wh-movement in NP’, Journal of Linguistics 23:79–108CrossRef Google Scholar

Hróarsdottir, T. 1999. ‘Verb phrase syntax in the history of Icelandic’, PhD thesis, University of Troms⊘. [Published 2000 as Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]

Huang, J. 1984. ‘On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 15:531–574Google Scholar

Huang, J. 1989. ‘Pro-drop in Chinese: a generalized control theory’, in O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 185–214

Hyams, N. 1986. Language Acquisition and The Theory of Parameters, Dordrecht: Kluwer

Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Janda, R. 2001. ‘Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization’, in Language Sciences 23:265–340 (special issue edited by L. Campbell)

Janda, R. and B. Joseph. 1999. ‘The Modern Greek negator mi(n)- as a morphological constellation’, in A. Moser (ed.), Greek Linguistics 97: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Language, Athens: Ellinika Grammata, pp. 333–340

Jannaris, A. 1897. An Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect, Hildesheim: Georg Olms. Reprint 1987

Jarad, N. 1997, ‘The origin and development of for-infinitives’. PhD diss., University of Wales, Bangor

Jespersen, O. 1909–1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, London: George Allen and Unwin

Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages, Copenhagen: A F. H⊘st

Jespersen, O. 1938. Growth and Structure of the English Language, Oxford: Blackwell. Reprint 1982

Joseph, B. 1981. ‘On the synchrony and diachrony of Modern Greek na’, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 7:139–154CrossRef Google Scholar

Joseph, B. 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive, Cambridge University Press

Joseph, B. 1990. Morphology and Universals in Syntactic Change: Evidence from Medieval and Modern Greek, New York: Garland

Joseph, B. 1994, ‘On weak subjects and pro-drop in Greek’, in I. Philippaki-Warburton, K. Nicolaidis and M. Sifianou (eds.), Themes in Greek Linguistics (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21–32

Joseph, B. 2001a. ‘Is there such as thing as “grammaticalization”?’, in Language Sciences 23:113–161 (special issue edited by L. Campbell)

Joseph, B. 2001b. ‘Language contact and the development of negation in Greek and the Balkans’, in Y. Agouraki, A. Arvaniti, J. Davy et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, 346–353

Joseph, B. and A. Zwicky (eds.). 1990. When Verbs Collide: Papers from the 1990 Ohio State Mini-Conference on Serial Verbs, Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics

Kamp, H. 1981, ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janseen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre, pp. 277–321

Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Kayne, R. 1982. ‘Predicates and arguments, verbs and nouns’, GLOW Newsletter 8:24Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching, Dordrecht: Foris

Kayne, R. 1991. ‘Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 22:647–686Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1993. ‘Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection’, Studia Linguistica 47:3–31CrossRef Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Kayne, R. 1998. ‘Overt versus covert movement’, Syntax 1:128–191CrossRef Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 2000, Parameters and Universals, Oxford University Press

Keenan, E. 1996, ‘Creating anaphors: an historical study of the English reflexive pronouns’, ms., UCLA

Kemenade A. van. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English, Dordrecht: Foris

, Kemenade A. 1993. ‘The history of the English modals: a reanalysis’, Folia Linguistica Historica 13/1–2:143–166Google Scholar

Kemenade A. van 1997. ‘V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 326–352

Kemenade A. van 2000. ‘Jespersen's cycle revisited: formal properties of grammaticalization’, in S. Pitzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, pp. 51–74

Kempchinsky, P. 1986. ‘Romance subjunctive clauses and logical form’, PhD diss., UCLA

Kenstowicz, M. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell

King, G. 1993. Modern Welsh: A Comprehensive Grammar, London: Routledge

Kiparsky, P. 1995. ‘Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax’, in A. Battye and I. Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, pp. 140–169

Klamer, M. 2000. ‘How report verbs become quote markers and complementisers’, Lingua 110:69–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Klima, E. 1964. ‘Negation in English’, in J. Fodor and J. Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 246–323

Koster, J. and E. Reuland (eds.). 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press

Krapova, I. 2001. ‘Subjunctives in Bulgarian and Modern Greek’, in M. L. Rivero and A. Ralli (eds.), Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, Oxford University Press, pp, 105–126

Kroch, A. and A. Taylor. 1997. ‘Verb movement in Old and Middle English: dialect variation and language contact’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–325

Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change Ⅰ: Internal Factors, Oxford University Press

Ladusaw, W. 1992. ‘Expressing negation’, Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) Ⅱ, Cornell University Press, pp. 237–259

Larson, R. 1987. ‘Missing prepositions and the analysis of English free relative clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 28:239–266Google Scholar

Lasnik, H. and M. Saito. 1991. ‘On the subject of infinitives’, in L. Dobrin, L. Nichols and R. Rodriguez (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 324–343. Reprint 1999 in H. Lasnik, Minimalist Analysis, Oxford: Blackwell

Lasnik, H. and M. Saito 1992. Move α: Conditions on its Application and Output, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Ledgeway, A. 1998. ‘Variation in the Romance infinitive: the case of the Southern Calabrian inflected infinitive’, Transactions of the Philological Society 96:1–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Ledgeway, A. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach, Publications of the Philological Society 33, Oxford: Blackwell

Lefebvre, C. (ed.), 1991. Serial Verbs: Grammatical, Comparative and Cognitive Approaches, Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Lehmann, C. 1985. ‘Grammaticalization: synchronic variation and diachronic change’, Lingua e Stile 20:303–318Google Scholar

Lema, J. and Rivero, M. L.. 1991. ‘Types of verbal movement in Old Spanish: modals, futures, and perfects’, Probus 3:237–278CrossRef Google Scholar

Lencho, M. 1992. ‘Evidence that “to” is a complementizer’, paper presented at the Comparative 8th Workshop on Germanic Syntax, University of Troms⊘, 20–22 November 1992

Liddell H. G., and R. Scott. 1968 (7th edition). Greek–English Lexicon, Oxford: Clarendon Press

Lightfoot, D. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax, Cambridge University Press

Lightfoot, D. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Lightfoot, D. 1998. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution, Oxford: Blackwell

Lindström, P. 1966. ‘First order predicate logic with generalized quantifiers’, Theoria 32:186–195Google Scholar

Lombardi, A. 1997. ‘The grammar of complementation in the dialects of Calabria’, PhD diss., University of Manchester

Longobardi, G. 1978. ‘Problemi di sintassi gotica. Aspetti teorici e descrittivi’, MA thesis, University of Pisa

Longobardi, G. 1991. ‘Alcune riflessioni informali sulla posizione del verbo in gotico e le prospettive di una sintassi comparata dei complementatori generici’, ms., University of Venice

Longobardi, G. 1994a, ‘La posizione del verbo gottico’, in P. Cipriano, P. di Giovine and M. Mancini (eds.), Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi. Roma: Il calamo, pp. 353–373

Longobardi, G. 1994b. ‘Reference and proper names’, Linguistic Inquiry 25:609–665Google Scholar

Longobardi, G. 2001a. ‘Formal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: the history of French chez’, Linguistic Inquiry 32:275–302CrossRef Google Scholar

Longobardi, G. 2001b. ‘The structure of DPs: some principles, parameters, and problems’, in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 562–603

Lord, C. 1976. ‘Evidence for syntactic reanalysis: from verb to complementizer in Kwa’, in S. Steever, C. Walker and S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 179–191

Lord, C. 1993. Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions, Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Los, B. 1999. Infinitival Complementation in Old and Middle English, The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics

Lyell, C. 1830. Principles of Geology, London

Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness, Cambridge University Press

Mackridge, P. 1993. ‘An editorial problem in Medieval Greek texts: the position of the object clitic pronoun in the Escorial Digenes Akrites’, in N. M. Panayiotakis (ed.), Origini delle letteratura neogreca, Proceedings of the 2nd International conference Neograeca Medii Aevi, vol. Ⅰ, Venice, pp. 325–342

Madeira, A. M. 1995. ‘Topics in Portuguese syntax: The licensing of T and D’, PhD diss., University College London

Mandilaras, B. 1973. The Verb in the Greek Non-literary Papyri, Athens: Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sciences

Manolesson, I. 2000. ‘Greek noun phrase structure: a study in syntactic evolution’. PhD diss., University of Cambridge

Manzini, M. R. and Roussou, A.. 2000. ‘A minimalist theory of A-movement and control’, Lingua 110:409–447CrossRef Google Scholar

Manzini, M. R. and L. Savoia. 1998. ‘Negation parameters and their interaction in Italian dialects’, Quaderni di lavoro dell'ASIS 2, University of Padova, pp. 39–60

Manzini, M. R. and L. Savoia 1999. ‘The syntax of middle-reflexive and object clitics: a case of parametrization in Arbëresh dialects’, in M. Mandalà (ed.), Studi di onore di Luigi Markelaj, Bari: Adriatica, pp. 283–328

Manzini, M. R. and L. Savoia 2001. ‘The syntax of object clitics: si in Italian dialects’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 233–264

Manzini, M. R. and L. Savoia 2002. ‘Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects’, in P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Expletives and the LEPP, Oxford University Press, pp. 157–199

Manzini, M. R. and L. Savoia Forthcoming. Morfosintassi dei dialetti italiani, Bologna: Ⅱ Mulino

Marantz, A. 1997. ‘No escape from the syntax: don't try a morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon’, ms., MIT

Martins, A. M. 2001. ‘Polarity items in Romance: underspecification and lexical change’, in S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, pp. 191–219

McCarthy, J. and A. Prince. 1986. ‘Prosodic morphology’, ms., Brandeis University

McCawley, J. 1971. ‘Tense and time reference in English’, in C. Fillmore and T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, pp. 96–113. Reprint 1973 in J. McCawley, Grammar and Meaning, Tokyo, Taishukan and New York: Academic Press, pp. 257–272

McCloskey, J. 1996. ‘The scope of verb-movement in Irish,’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14:47–104CrossRef Google Scholar

McMahon, A. 1994. Understanding Language Change, Cambridge University Press

Meillet, A. 1912. ‘L’évolution des formes grammaticales’. Reprint 1958 in A. Meillet, Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale, Paris: Champion, pp. 130–158

Morris-Jones, J. 1913. A Welsh Grammar: Phonology and Accidence, Oxford University Press

Mostowski, A. 1957. ‘On a generalization of quantifiers’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 44: 12–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Newmeyer, F. 1998. Language Form and Language Function, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Niyogi, P. and R. Berwick. 1995. ‘The logical problem of language acquisiton’, MIT AI Memo No. 1516

Nocentini, A. 1990. ‘L'uso dei dimostrativi nella Peregrinatio Egeriae e la genesi dell’ articolo romanzo’, in Atti del convegno internazionale sulla Peregrinatio Egeriae, Arezzo: Accademia Petrarca, pp. 137–158

Nocentini, A. Forthcoming. ‘Le genesi del futuro e condizionale sintetico romanzo’, Zeitschrift für Romanische PhilologieGoogle Scholar

Nosu, N. 2002. ‘Aspects of the syntax of A-movement: a study of English infinitival constructions and related phenomena’, PhD diss., University of Essex

Ouhalla, J. 1991. Functional Categories and Parametric Variation, London: Routledge

Ouhalla, J. 1996. ‘Remarks on the binding properties of wh-pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 27:676–707Google Scholar

Ouhalla, J. 1997. ‘Types of negation elements’, talk given at the 9th Wuppertaler Linguistisches Kolloquium, University of Wuppertal

Panagiotidis, Ph. 2002. Pronouns, Clitics, and Empty Pronouns, Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Pappas, P. 2001. ‘The microcosm of a morphological change: variation in thelō + infinitive futures and ēthela + infinitive counterfactuals in Early Modern Greek’, Diachronica 18:59–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Pappas, P. and B. Joseph. 2001. ‘The development of the Greek future system: setting the record straight’, in Y. Agouraki, A. Arraniti, J. Davy et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, pp. 354–359

Pesetsky, D. 1982, ‘Paths and categories’, PhD diss., MIT

Pesetsky, D. 1991. ‘Zero syntax Ⅱ: an essay on infinitives’, ms., MIT

Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1987. ‘The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek’, Journal of Linguistics 23:289–318CrossRef Google Scholar

Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1992. ‘On mood and complementizers in Modern Greek’, Reading University Working Papers in Linguistics 1:5–41Google Scholar

Philippaki-Warburton, I. 1998. ‘Functional categories and Modern Greek syntax’, The Linguistic Review 15:159–186CrossRef Google Scholar

Philippaki-Warburton, I. and Spyropoulos, V.. 2000. ‘A change of mood: The mood system of Hellenistic and Roman Koine Greek (3rd BC – 4th AD)’, Studies in Greek Linguistics 20: 567–578Google Scholar

Philippi, J. 1997. ‘The rise of the article in the Germanic languages’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp 62–93

Pica, P. 1987. ‘On the nature of the reflexivization cycle’, NELS 17:483–499Google Scholar

Picallo, C. 1985. ‘Opaque domains’, PhD diss., City University of New York

Pinkster, H. 1987. ‘The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin’, in M. Harris and P. Ramat (eds.), Historical Development of Auxiliaries, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 193–223

Pintzuk, S. 1991. ‘Phrase structures in competition: variation and change in Old English word order’, PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Platzack, C. 1987. ‘The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5:377–401CrossRef Google Scholar

Platzack, C. 2001. ‘Multiple interfaces’, in U. Nikanne and E. van der Zee (eds.), Cognitive Interfaces: Constraints on Linking Cognitive Information, Oxford University Press, pp. 21–53

Plank, F. 1984, ‘The modals story retold’, Studies in Language 8:305–364CrossRef Google Scholar

Poletto, C. 1993. ‘Subject clitic-verb inversion in North Eastern Italian dialects’, in A. Belletti (ed.), Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier, pp. 204–251

Poletto, C. 1995, ‘The diachronic development of subject clitics in North Eastern Italian dialects’, in A. Battye and I. Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, pp. 295–324

Poletto, C. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects, Oxford University Press

Poletto, C. and P. Benincà. 1997. ‘The diachronic development of a modal verb of necessity’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 94–118

Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. ‘Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20:365–424Google Scholar

Postal, P. 1966. ‘On so-called pronouns in English’, in F. Dinneen (ed.), Nineteenth Monograph on Languages and Linguistics, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press

Postal, P. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Postma, G. 1995. ‘Zero semantics’, PhD diss., Holland Institute of Linguistics

Pullum, G. K. 1982. ‘Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to’, Glossa 16:181–215Google Scholar

Pullum, G. K. and Wilson, D.. 1977. ‘Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries’, Language 53:741–788CrossRef Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Radford, A. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell

Radford, A. 1997. Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Cambridge University Press

Renzi, L. 1976. ‘Grammatica e storia dell'articolo italiano’, Studi di grammatica italiana 5:5–42Google Scholar

Renzi, L. 1992. ‘Le développement de l'article en roman’, Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 37:161–76Google Scholar

Renzi, L. 1993. ‘Vestiges de la flexion casuelle dans les langues romanes’, in Actes du Xxème Congrès Internationale de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, vol Ⅱ, Bern: Francke, pp. 672–67

Renzi, L. 1997. ‘Fissione di lat. ILLE nelle lingue romanze’, in G. Holtus, J. Kramer and W. Sweckhard (eds.), Italica et Romanica. Festschrift für Max Pfister zum 65. Geburtstag, Tübingen: Niemeyer

Repetti, L. 1989. ‘The bimoraic norm of tonic syllables in Italo-Romance’. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles

Repetti, L. 1991. ‘A moraic analysis of raddoppiamento sintattico’, Rivista di Linguistica 3:307–330Google Scholar

Ribeiro, I. 1995. ‘Evidence for a Verb-second phase in Old Portuguese’, in A. Battye and I. Roberts (eds.), Clause Structure and Language Change, Oxford University Press, pp. 110–139

Ritter, E. 1991. ‘Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Hebrew’, in S. D. Rothstein (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Syntax and Semantics 25, New York and London: Academic Press, 37–62

Rivero, M.-L. 1994. ‘Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12:63–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Rivero, M.-L. 1997. ‘On two locations for complement clitic pronouns: Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian and Old Spanish’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–206

Rivero, M.-L. and Terzi, A.. 1995. ‘Imperatives, V-movement, and logical mood’, Journal of Linguistics 31:301–332CrossRef Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax, Dordrecht: Foris

Rizzi, L. 1986a. ‘Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17:501–557Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1986b. ‘On the status of subject clitics in Romance’, in O. Jaeggli and C. Silva-Corvalàn (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 137–152

Rizzi, L. 1997. ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337

Rizzi, L. 2001. ‘On the position Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 287–296

Roberts, I. 1985. ‘Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3:21–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1993a. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer

Roberts, I. 1993b. ‘A formal account of grammaticalisation in the history of the Romance futures’, Folia Linguistica Historica 13:219–258Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1994. ‘Two types of head movement in Romance’, in D. Lightfoot and N. Hornstein (eds.), Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–242

Roberts, I. 1997a. ‘Directionality and word order change in the history of English’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–426

Roberts, I. 1997b. ‘Restructuring, head movement, and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28:423–460Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1998. ‘Have/be raising, Move F, and Procrastinate’, Linguistic Inquiry 29:113–125CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, I. 1999. ‘Verb movement and markedness’, in M. de Graff (ed.), Language Change and Language Creation: Creolization, Diachrony and Development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 287–327

Roberts, I. 2001. ‘Language change and learnability’, in S. Bertolo (ed.), Language Acquisition and Learnability, Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–125

Roberts, I. Forthcoming. Principles and Parameters in a VSO Language: A Case Study in Welsh Syntax, Oxford University Press

Roberts, I. and Roussou, A.. 1999. ‘A formal approach to “grammaticalization”’, Linguistics 37:1011–1041CrossRef Google Scholar

Roberts, I. and A. Roussou. 2002. ‘The EPP as a condition on the T-dependency’, in P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Oxford University Press, pp. 125–155

Roberts, I. and U. Shlonsky. 1996. ‘Pronominal enclisis in VSO languages’, in R. Borsley and I. Roberts (eds.), The Syntax of the Celtic Languages: A Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press, pp. 171–200

Rohlfs, G. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti: Sintassi e formazione delle parole, Turin: Einaudi

Rosenbaum, P. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Ross, J. 1967. ‘Auxiliaries as main verbs’, in W. Todd (ed.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, Series Ⅰ, Evanston, IL: Great Expectations Press

Rouchota, V. 1994. ‘The semantics and pragmatics of subjunctive in Modern Greek: a Relevance-theoretic approach’, PhD diss., University College London

Roussou, A. 1991. ‘Nominalised clauses in the syntax of Modern Greek’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 3:77–100Google Scholar

Roussou, A. 1994. ‘The syntax of complementisers’, PhD diss., University College London

Roussou, A. 1998. ‘Wh-interrogatives: from Classical Greek to Modern Greek’, in S. Lambropoulou (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 109–126

Roussou, A. 1999. ‘Modals and the subjunctive’, in A. Alexiadou, G. Horrocks and M. Stavrou (eds.), Studies in Greek Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 169–183

Roussou, A. 2000. ‘On the left periphery: modal particles and complementisers’, Journal of Greek Linguistics 1:65–94CrossRef Google Scholar

Roussou, A. 2001. ‘Control and Raising in and out of subjunctive complements’, in M. L. Rivero and A. Ralli (eds.), Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, Oxford University Press, pp. 74–104

Roussou, A. 2002a. ‘The syntax of non-volitional thelo in Modern Greek’, ms., University of Patras

Roussou, A. 2002b. ‘C, T, and the subject: that-t phenomena revisited’, Lingua 112:13–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Roussou, A. and I. Roberts. 2001. ‘Pou-complements and Acc-ing constructions: a comparative analysis’, in Y. Agouraki, A. Arvaniti, J. Davy et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, pp. 201–208

Roussou, A. and I. M. Tsimpli. 1994. ‘On the interaction of Case and definiteness in Modern Greek’, in I. Philippaki-Warburton, K. Nicolaidis and M. Sifianou (eds.), Themes in Greek Linguistics (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–76

Rouveret, A. 1991. Syntaxe du Gallois: principes généraux et typologie, Paris: CNRS

Rowlands, T. 1853. Rowland's Welsh Grammar, Wrexham: Hughes and Son

Ruhlen, M. 1987. A Guide to the World's Languages, vol. Ⅰ, Classification, London: Edward Arnold

Russell, P. 1995. An Introduction to the Celtic Languages, London: Longman

Rutten, J. 1991. Infinitival Complements and Auxiliaries, Amsterdam Studies in Generative Grammar 4, University of Amsterdam

Salles, H. M. 2002. ‘The prepositional complementiser para in Brazilian Portuguese’, ms., University of Brasilia

Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale, C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with A. Riedlinger. Reprint 1972 (with introduction and notes by T. de Mauro), Paris: Payot

Scappatura, M. 1992. Antologia di poeti dialettali di Reggio Calabria e provincia, Reggio Calabria: Il Grifo

Ščur, G. 1968. ‘On the non-finite forms of the verb can in Scottish’, Acta Linguistica Hafniensa 11:211–218CrossRef Google Scholar

Selig, M. 1992. Die Entwicklung der Nominaldeterminanten im Spätlatein, Tübingen: Niemeyer

Sher, G. 1996. ‘Semantics and Logic’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 511–537

Sihler, A. L. 1995. A New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford University Press

Siloni, T. 1990. ‘Hebrew noun phrases: generalized noun raising’, ms., University of Geneva

Simpson, A. and Z. Wu. 2001. ‘The grammaticalization of formal nouns and nominalizers in Chinese, Japanese and Korean’, in T. E. McCauley (ed.), Language Change in East Asia, Sheffield Conference on Language Change in Japan and East Asia. London: Curzon, pp. 250–283

Smith, N. and I. M. Tsimpli. 1995. The Mind of a Savant: Language, Learning and Modularity, Oxford: Blackwell

Sorrento, L. 1951. Sintassi romanza, ricerche e prospettive, Varese-Milan: Cisalpino

Sportiche, D. 1996. ‘Clitic constructions’, in J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 213–276

Stowell, T. 1981. ‘Origins of phrase structure’, PhD thesis, MIT

Stowell, T. 1996. ‘The phrase structure of tense’, in J. Rooryk and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 277–292

Szabolsci, A. 1983/1984. ‘The possessor that ran away from home’, The Linguistic Review 3:89–102Google Scholar

Szemerényi, O. 1996. Introduction to Indo-European Linguistics, Oxford University Press

Tabor, W. and E. Closs-Traugott. 1998. ‘Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization’, in A. Giacalone-Ramat and P. Hopper (eds.), The Limits of Grammaticalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 229–272

Tekavčić, P. 1980. Grammatica storica dell'Italiano, Bologna: Il Mulino

Terzi, A. 1992. ‘PRO in finite clauses: A study of the inflectional heads of the Balkan languages’, PhD diss., City University of New York

Thráinsson, H. 1996. ‘On the (non-)universality of functional categories’, in W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thráinsson and J. W. Zwart (eds.), Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 253–281

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. 1987. The Auxiliary Do in Eighteenth-Century English: A Sociohistorical-Linguistic Approach, Dordrecht: Foris

Trumper, J. 1997. ‘Calabria and Southern Basilicata’, in M. Maiden and M. Parry (eds.), The Dialects of Italy, London: Routledge, pp. 355–364

Trypanis, A. C. 1960. ‘Early medieval Greek hina’, Glotta 38:312–313Google Scholar

Tsangalidis, A. 1999. ‘Will’ and ‘tha’: A Comparative Study of the Category Future, Thessaloniki: University Studio Press

Tsangalidis, A. 2002. ‘“Tenses” and “moods” of the Modern Greek verb’, Studies in Greek Linguistic 22:647–658Google Scholar

Tsangalidis, A. and F. Valetopoulos. 1999. ‘The “aorist subjunctive” in early Modern Greek’ [in Greek], Studies in Greek Linguistics 19, Thessaloniki, pp. 523–534

Tsimpli, I. M. 1990. ‘Clause structure and word order in Modern Greek’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2:226–255Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I. M. 1995. ‘Focusing in Modern Greek’, in È. Kiss (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages, Oxford University Press, pp. 176–206

Tsimpli, I. M. 1997. ‘Resumptive strategies and L2A: a minimalist account’, in E. Hughes, M. Hughes and A. Greenhill (eds.), Boston University Conference on Language Development 21, vol. Ⅱ, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 639–655

Tsoulas, G. 1993. ‘Remarks on the structure and interpretation of na-clauses’, Studies in Greek Linguistics 14, Thessaloniki, pp. 191–206

Uriagereka, J. 1997. ‘Formal and substantive elegance in the minimalist program’, in C. Wilder, H.-M. Gärtner and M. Bierwisch (eds.), The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, Berlin: Akademie Ver1ag, pp. 170–204

Vance, B. 1988. ‘Null subjects and syntactic change in Medieval French’, PhD thesis, Cornell Univesity

Vance, B. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb Second and Null Subjects, Dordrecht: Kluwer

Vanelli, L., L. Renzi and P. Benincà. 1986. ‘Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes’, in Linguistique descriptive: Actes du ⅩⅤlle Congrès International de Linguistiques et Philologie Romanes, vol. Ⅲ, Aix-en-Provence: University of Provence, pp. 164–176

Varlokosta, S. 1994. ‘Issues on Modern Greek sentential complementation’, PhD diss., University of Maryland

Vassere, S. 1993. I pronomi clitici del luganese, Milano: Franco Angeli

Veloudis, I. 1985. ‘Tensed na-complements in Modern Greek’ [in Greek], in Studies in Greek Linguistics 6, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 183–198

Veloudis, I. and I. Philippaki-Warburton. 1983. ‘The subjunctive in Modern Greek’ [in Greek], in Studies in Greek Linguistics 4, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 151–168

Vergnaud, J.-R. 1974. ‘French relatives clauses’, PhD thesis, MIT. [Published 1985 as Dépendences et niveaux de representation en syntaxe, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]

Vergnaud, J.-R. and Zubizarreta, M. L.. 1992. ‘The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and in English’, Linguistic Inquiry 23:595–652Google Scholar

Vikner, S. 1988. Modals in Danish and Event Expressions, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 39

Vikner, S. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press

Vikner, N. 1997. ‘Ⅴ0-to-Ⅰ0 movement and inflection for person in all tenses’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, London: Longman, pp. 189–213

Vincent, N. 1982. ‘The development of the auxiliaries HABERE and ESSE in Romance’, in N. Vincent and M. Harris (eds.), Studies in the Romance Verb, London: Croom Helm, pp. 71–96

Vincent, N. 1997. ‘The emergence of the D-system in Romance’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–169

Vincent, N. 1999. ‘The evolution of c-structure: prepositions and PPs from Indo-European to Romance’, Linguistics 37:1111–1153CrossRef Google Scholar

Visser, F. T. 1963–73. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: Brill

Vogel, I. 1994. ‘Phonological interfaces in Italian’, in M. Mazola (ed.), Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Linguistics Symposium on the Romance Languages ⅩⅩⅢ, pp. 109–125

Vogel, I. 1999. ‘Subminimal constituents in prosodic phonology’, in S. J. Hannahs and M. Davenport (eds.), Issues in Phonological Structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 251–267

Wahba, W. A.-F. B. 1991. ‘LF movement in Iraqi Arabic’, in C.-T. J. Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 253–276

Warner, A. 1983. ‘Review of Lightfoot 1979’, Journal of Linguistics 19:187–209CrossRef Google Scholar

Warner, A. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History, Cambridge University Press

Warner, A. 1997. ‘The structure of parametric change, and V movement in the history of English’, in A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Cambridge University Press, pp. 380–393

Wanner, D. 1987. The Development of Romance Clitic Pronouns: From Latin to Old Romance, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Watkins, C. 1962. The Indo-European Origins of the Celtic Verb: Ⅰ, the Sigmatic Aorist, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies

Watkins, C. 1996. ‘Proto-Indo-European: comparison and reconstruction’, in A. Giacalone-Ramat and P. Ramat (eds.), The Indo-European Languages, London: Routledge, pp. 25–73

Wexler, K. and M. R. Manzini. 1987. ‘Parameters and learnability in binding theory’, in T. Roeper and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter Setting, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 41–76

Whitman, J. 2001. ‘Relabelling’, in S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas and A. Warner (eds.), Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, pp. 220–238

Williams, E. 1984. ‘There-insertion’, Linguistic Inquiry 15:131–153Google Scholar

Willis, D. 1998. Syntactic Change in Welsh: A Study of the Loss of Verb-Second, Oxford University Press

der, Wurff W.. 1997. ‘Deriving object-verb order in late Middle English’, Journal of Linguistics 33:485–509Google Scholar

der, Wurff W. 1999. ‘Objects and verbs in Modern Icelandic and fifteenth-century English: a word order parallel and its causes’, Lingua 109:237–265Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, S. 1998. ‘Infinitives’, PhD diss., MIT

Zamparelli, R. 1996. ‘Layers in the Determiner Phrase’, PhD thesis, University of Rochester, NY

Zanuttini, R. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages, Oxford University Press

Zubizaretta, M.-L. 1982. ‘On the relation of the lexicon to syntax’. PhD thesis, MIT

Zwart, J.-W. 1993. ‘Dutch Syntax’, PhD thesis, University of Groningen. [Revised version Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.]