Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:07:22.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Representing and reasoning with conceptual understanding

from Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Brent Yarnal
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Colin Polsky
Affiliation:
Clark University, Massachusetts
James O'Brien
Affiliation:
Kingston University, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the primary goals for HERO was to provide a knowledge management system for interdisciplinary research that also provides a link between human understanding and formal systems, for example databases, analyses, and models. Chapter 2 elaborated extensively on how concepts that people create and use in their attempts to understand and manage Earth's dynamic systems are defined differently depending on place and situation. It was specifically pointed out that it is of particular importance for multidisciplinary research such as HERO to articulate how concepts and understanding change with context. While Chapter 3 demonstrated progress made in developing support for the process of collaboratory research this chapter addresses representational issues involved in linking human understanding with formal systems. We present two ways of modeling knowledge about both the conceptual understanding of human–environment interaction and the process of decision-making.

A parameterized representation of uncertain conceptual spaces

The collaboratory Web portal (Chapter 2) embodies the idea of a customizable window onto distributed resources and ways to make these accessible to a group of users. For a portal to be able to filter and customize the content to a specific user community, one of the critical components to any such solution is a metadata structure that describes and represents available resources. The goal is to enable users to exchange methods, data, ideas, and results. Most results presented in this book were achieved by negotiating a common understanding, adhering to a shared vocabulary, and using a common set of methods.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sustainable Communities on a Sustainable Planet
The Human-Environment Regional Observatory Project
, pp. 59 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlqvist, O., 2004. A parameterized representation of uncertain conceptual spaces, Transactions in GIS 8(4): 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlqvist, O., 2005. Using uncertain conceptual spaces to translate between land cover categories. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19(7): 831–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlqvist, O., and Gahegan, M., 2005. Probing the relationship between classification error and class similarity. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 71(12): 1365–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlqvist, O., and Shortridge, A., 2006. Characterizing land cover structure with semantic variograms. In Progress in Spatial Data Handling, eds. Reidl, A., Kainz, W., and Elmes, G. A., pp. 401–415. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlqvist, O., Keukelaar, J., and Oukbir, K., 2003. Rough and fuzzy geographical data integration. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 17(3): 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E., 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data, Professional Paper No. 964. Washington, D. C.: United States Geological Survey.
Bishr, Y., 1997. Semantic Aspects of Interoperable GIS. ITC Ph.D. Publication Series No. 56. Enschede, The Netherlands: International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences.
Collins, A. M., and Quillian, M. R., 1969. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8: 240–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, D., and Prade, H., 1992. Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together. In Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, ed. Slowinski, R., pp. 203–232. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahegan, M. N., 1999. Characterizing the semantic content of geographic data, models, and systems. In Interoperating Geographic Information Systems, eds. Goodchild, M. F., Egenhofer, M. J., Fegeas, R., and Kottman, C A, pp. 71–83. Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P., 2000. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giarrantano, J. C., 1998. Otter: an automated deduction system. Accessed at www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/AR/otter.
Luck, M., and d'Inverno, M., 2001. Autonomy: a nice idea in theory. In Intelligent Agents VII: Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, eds. Castelfranchi, C. and Lesperance, Y., pp. 351–353. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennis, J. L., 2003. Derivation and implementation of a semantic GIS data model informed by principles of cognition. Computers, Environment and Urban Sytems 27: 455–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M., 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. Winston, P. H., pp. 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Minsky, M., 1991. Logical versus analogical or symbolic versus connectionist or neat versus scruffy. AI Magazine 12(2): 34–51.Google Scholar
Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B., 1984. Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, Z., 1991. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Regional Earth Science Applications Center (RESAC), 2004. RESAC Chesapeake Bay Watershed Land Cover – 2000, Version 1.05. Accessed at www.geog.umd.edu/resac/.
Robinson, V. B., 2003. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 7(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, M. A. and Egenhofer, M., 2004. Comparing geospatial entity classes. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 18: 229–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowa, J. F., 1984. Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau, 2000. Accessed at http://factfinder.census.gov.
,United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2005. National Land Cover Dataset 1992. Accessed at http://landcover.usgs.gov/natllandcover.asp.
,United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2003. Water on Tap: What You Need to Know, EPA 816-K-03-007. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.Google Scholar
Yu, C., 2004. GeoAgent-based knowledge acquisition, representation, and validation. In GIScience 2004, eds. Egenhofer, M. J., Freksa, C., and Harvey, M., pp. 338–341. Adelphi, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Yu, C., 2005. GeoAgent-based knowledge systems. Unpublished dissertation. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.
Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×