Book contents
- Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands
- Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Challenge
- Part III Engineered Rivers
- Part IV Response
- 16 River Basin Management and Irrigation
- 17 “Intelligent” Water Transfers
- 18 Better Basin Management with Stakeholder Participation
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
17 - “Intelligent” Water Transfers
from Part IV - Response
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 September 2021
Book contents
- Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands
- Sustainability of Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Challenge
- Part III Engineered Rivers
- Part IV Response
- 16 River Basin Management and Irrigation
- 17 “Intelligent” Water Transfers
- 18 Better Basin Management with Stakeholder Participation
- Part V Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Inter-basin water transfers (IBWT) offer an approach to addressing water scarcity by confronting the mismatch between water supply and demand in the context of a sustainable development policy. However, IBWTs are often criticized – particularly when the water transfer involves crossing political boundaries. In those circumstances, the policy debate often tends to lose sight of important aspects that guarantee a rational water policy. This chapter addresses issues related to water transfers between river basins, not only in the hydrological term but also, quite frequently, over political boundaries (transboundary water transfer). We present a number of case studies chosen to provide a representative geographical view of IBWTs around the world and insights on the different aspects that involve IBWTs. Intelligent IBWT should be implemented in the context of more general sustainable development strategies and Integrated Water Resources Management.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sustainability of Engineered Rivers In Arid LandsChallenge and Response, pp. 246 - 259Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abu-Zeid, M. (1983). The River Nile: Main Water Transfer Projects in Egypt and Impacts on Egyptian Agriculture. In Biswas, A. K., Zuo, D., Nickum, J. E., and Liu, C., eds., Long-Distance Water Transfer: A Chinese Case Study and International Experiences. United Nations University.Google Scholar
Aguirre, C. and Drinot, P. (2017). The Peculiar Revolution: Rethinking the Peruvian Experiment under Military Rule. Paperback. Austin: University of Texas Press, p. 353.Google Scholar
Azevedo, L. G. T. de, Porto, R. L. L., Mello, A. V. Jr et al. (2005). Inter-Basin Water Transfers. World Bank – Water Series, 7, p. 93.Google Scholar
Ballestero, E. (2004). Inter-Basin Water Transfer Public Agreements: A Decision Approach to Quantity and Price. Water Resources Management, 18, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar
Beijing Qingnianbao [Beijing Youth News] (2017). Caofeidian baiwan dun danhua haishui jiang jinjing [曹妃甸百万吨淡化海水将进京 (Caofeidian Will Provide a Million Tonnes of Desalinated Seawater to Beijing)]. Available at www.bj.xinhuanet.com/bjyw/2017-12/08/c_1122079691.htmGoogle Scholar
Biswas, A. K., Liu, C., Zuo, D., and Nickum, J. E. (1983). Long-Distance Water Transfer: A Chinese Case Study and International Experiences. United Nations University, p. 432.Google Scholar
Casana, A. C. (2005). Rationalize the Use of Water Demand: Chavimochic Project. Available at www.laindustria.com/satelliteGoogle Scholar
Cox, William E. (1999). Determining when Interbasin Water Transfer Is Justified: Criteria for Evaluation. In Inter-basin Water Transfer: Looking for Solutions for the Future, Technical Documents in Hydrology Vol. 28. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Donia, N. S. (2012). Development of El-Salam Canal Automation System. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4, pp. 597–604. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.48069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghassemi, F. and White, I. (2007). Inter-Basin Water Transfer: Case Studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China, and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gichuki, F. and McCornick, P. G. (2008). International Experiences of Water Tranfers: Relevance to India. In Amarasinghe, U. A. and Sharma, B. R., eds., Strategic Analyses of the National River Linking Project (NRLP) of India - Proceedings of the Workshop on Analyses of Hydrological, Social and Ecological Issues of the NRLP, pp. 345–371.Google Scholar
Hafez, A. (2005). Investigation of El-Salam Canal Project in Northern Sinai, Egypt – Phase I: Environmental Baseline, Soil and Water Quality Studies. Proceedings of the Ninth International Water Technology Conference, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt: IWTC9 2005, pp. 953–970.Google Scholar
Jia, S. and Liu, J. (2014). Daguo Shuiqing: Zhongguo Shui Wenti Baogao [The Water Regime of a Large Country: A Report On China’s Water Problems]. Wuhan: Huazhong Keji Daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
Kuo, L. (2014). China Is Moving More than a River Thames of Water across the Country to Deal with Water Scarcity, Quartz. Available at qz.com/158815/chinas-so-bad-at-water-conservation-that-it-had-to-launch-the-most-impressive-water-pipeline-project-ever-builtGoogle Scholar
Lund, J. R. and Israel, M. (1995). Water Transfers in Water Resources Systems. 1–16. Available at https://watershed.ucdavis.edu/shed/lund/ftp/Transfers.docGoogle Scholar
Lynch, B. (2013). River of Contention: Scarcity Discourse and Water Competition in Highland Peru. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 42, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
Magalhães, A. R. and Martins, E. S. P. R. (2019). The Case of the São Francisco River. In Engineered Rivers in Arid Lands: Searching for Sustainability in Theory and Practice. Philadelphia: CRC.Google Scholar
National Academy Press (2017). Water Conservation, Reuse, and Recycling, p. 293. https://doi.org/10.17226/11241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quosy, D. E. (2005). Agricultural Development in Egypt across Two Millenniums. Virtual Global Super Project Conference, 2001: World Development Federation. Available at www.wdf.org/gspcGoogle Scholar
Roman, P. (2017). The São Francisco Interbasin Water Transfer in Brazil: Tribulations of a Megaproject through Constraints and Controversy. Water Alternatives, 10(2), pp. 395–419.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1999). Interbasin Water Transfer: Looking for Solutions for the Future. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Technical Documents in Hydrology Vol. 28, Paris.Google Scholar
USDI (2004). Bureau of Reclamation. Colorado – Big Thompson Project. Available at www.usbr.gov/dataweb.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. and Liu, Y. (1983). An Investigation of the Water Quality and Pollution in the Rivers of the Proposed Water Transfer Region. In Biswas et al., Long-Distance Water Transfer, pp. 361–371.Google Scholar
Wang, K. and Zhang, A. (2018). Climate Change, Natural Disasters, and Adaptation Investments: Inter- and Intra-port Competition and Cooperation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 117, pp. 158–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.08.003Google Scholar
World Commission on Dams (2000). Dams and Development, A New Framework for Decision Making.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WWF (2007). Pipedreams? Interbasin Water Transfers and Water Shortages. Global Freshwater Programme, WWF, p. 49.Google Scholar
Yang, H. and Zehnder, A. J. B. (2005). The South-North Water Transfer Project in China: An Analysis of Water Demand Uncertainty and Environmental Objectives In Decision Making. Water International, 30(3), pp. 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, B. and Chen, Q. (1983). South-North Water Transfer Project plans. In Biswas et al., Long-Distance Water Transfer, pp. 127–149.Google Scholar
Zimbelman, D. D. and Werner, B. R. (2001). Water Management in the Northern Colorado Water Conservation District. In Schaack, J. and Anderson, S. S., eds., Transbasin Water Transfers. Proceedings of the 2001 USCID Water Management Conference, Denver, Colorado, 27–30 June 2001. Denver, CO: US Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, pp. 331–339.Google Scholar