Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E.L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ASCE, UNESCO (1998). Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. ASCE, Reston.Google Scholar

Babel, M., Pandey, V., Rivas, A., & Wahid, S. (2011). Indicator-based approach for assessing the vulnerability of freshwater resources in the Bagmati River Basin, Nepal. Environmental Management 48, 1044–1059.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020). System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–64.Google Scholar

Bonriposi, M. (2013). Les usages de l’eau dans la région de Crans-Montana-Sierre: description, quantification et prévisions (Doctoral thesis). University of Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar

CH2011 (2011). Les scénarios du changement climatique en Suisse CH2011. www.ch2011.ch (accessed 08.05.2012).Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.Google Scholar

Franco, L. (2006). Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: A conceptual development. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 813–821.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of Justice: Re-imagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24, 170–182.Google Scholar

Gleick, P. H. (1998). Water in crisis: Paths to sustainable water use. Ecological Applications, 8, 571–579.Google Scholar

Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13, 459–471.Google Scholar

Hartmuth, G., Huber, K., & Rink, D. (2008). Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustainable Development, 16, 261–270.Google Scholar

Hill, M. (2013). Climate Change and Water Governance: Adaptive Capacity in Chile and Switzerland. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Ioris, A. A. R., Hunter, C., & Walker, S. (2008). The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 1190–1201.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. DOI:http://10.1177/1558689806298224.Google Scholar

Kondratyev, S., Gronskaya, T., Ignatieva, N., Blinova, I., Telesh, I., & Yefremova, L. (2002). Assessment of present state of water resources of Lake Ladoga and its drainage basin using sustainable development indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2, 79–92.Google Scholar

Lachavanne, B., & Juge, R. (2009). LEMANO. Pour une gestion durable de l’eau. Lémaniques, 72, 1–16.Google Scholar

Larson, K. L., Wiek, A., & Withycombe Keeler, L. (2013). A comprehensive sustainability appraisal of water governance in Phoenix, AZ. Journal of Environmental Management, 116, 58–71.Google Scholar

McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013). Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 416–427.Google Scholar

McDonald, D., Bammer, G., & Deane, P. (2009). Research Integration Using Dialogue Methods. Canberra: ANU E Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). The value-loadedness of sustainability: Implications for the transformative potential of sustainability assessments. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

Merino-Saum, A. (2020). Assessing sustainability through participatory multi-criteria approaches (PMCAs): An updated comparative analysis. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–238.Google Scholar

Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 94–106.Google Scholar

Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 18. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss11/art18/.Google Scholar

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.Google Scholar

Reed, P. M., & Kasprzyk, J. (2009). Water resources management: The myth, the wicked, and the future. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 135, 411–413.Google Scholar

Reynard, E., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., et al. (2014.) Interdisciplinary assessment of complex regional water systems and their future evolution: How socio-economic drivers can matter more than climate. WIREs Water, 1, 413–426.Google Scholar

Rixen, C., Stoeckli, V., & Ammann, W. (2003). Does artificial snow production affect soil and vegetation of ski pistes? A review. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 5, 219–230.Google Scholar

Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, F., & Homewood, C. (2013). Exploring water governance arrangements in the Swiss Alps from the perspective of adaptive capacity. Mountain Research and Development, 33, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, F., & Rist, S. (2014). Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches. Sustainability Science 9, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, F., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., et al. (2015). Assessing the sustainability of water governance systems: The sustainability wheel. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 1577–1600.Google Scholar

Schneider, F., Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A., Buser, T., Ingalls, M., & Messerli, P. How Can Science Support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development? Four Tasks to Deal with the Normative Dimension of Sustainability. Sustainability Science, 1–12.Google Scholar

Shen, L.-Y., Jorge Ochoa, J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35, 17–29.Google Scholar

Sullivan, C., & Meigh, J. (2007). Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resources Management, 21, 111–128.Google Scholar

Tompkins, E. L., & Adger, W. (2004). Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecology and Society, 9, 10. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss12/art10.Google Scholar

Turcu, C. (2013). Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56, 695–719.Google Scholar

Valenzuela Montes, L. M., & Matarán Ruiz, A. (2008). Environmental indicators to evaluate spatial and water planning in the coast of Granada (Spain). Land Use Policy, 25, 95–105.Google Scholar

WCED. (1987). Our Common Future (“The Brundtland Report”). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiek, A., & Larson, K. (2012). Water, People, and Sustainability: A systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resources Management, 26, 3153–3171.Google Scholar

Ziegler, R., & Ott, K. (2011). The quality of sustainability science: A philosophical perspective. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 7, 31–44.Google Scholar

Acker-Widmaier, G. (1999). Intertemporale Gerechtigkeit und nachhaltiges Wirtschaften. Zur normativen Begründung eines Leitbildes. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar

Barton, J., Jordan, F. R., León, A. S. M., & Solis, M. O. (2007). ¿Cuán sustentable es la Región Metropolitana de Santiago? Metodologías de evaluación de la sustentabilidad. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), pp. 65–70.Google Scholar

Barton, J., & Kopfmüller, J. (2012). Sustainable urban development in Santiago de Chile: Background – concept – challenges. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martinez, F. (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

Birnbacher, D. (1999). Kommentargutachten, beauftragt im Rahmen des HGF-Projekts „Untersuchung zu einem integrativen Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Bestandsaufnahme, Problemanalyse, Weiterentwicklung.” Düsseldorf Edition.Google Scholar

Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Kopfmüller, J., & Paetau, M. (2001). Das integrative Konzept: Mindestbedingungen nachhaltiger Entwicklung. In Grunwald, A, Coenen, R, Nitsch, J, Sydow, A, & Wiedemann, P (eds.), Forschungswerkstatt Nachhaltigkeit – Wege zur Diagnose und Therapie von Nachhaltigkeitsdefiziten. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 79–102.Google Scholar

Bräutigam, K.-R., Gonzalez, T., Szanto, M., Seifert, H., & Vogdt, J. (2012). Municipal solid waste management in Santiago de Chile: Challenges and perspectives towards sustainability. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 279–301.Google Scholar

Brown-Weiss, E. (1989). In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony and Intergenerational Equity. Dobbs Ferry, NY: The United Nations University and Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar

District Future – Urban Lab. (2018). www.itas.kit.edu/english/num_current_paro11_quazu.php (accessed 26.4.2018).Google Scholar

Emmrich, R., & Melzer, M. (2012). Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept der HGF als Baustein der Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 171–188.Google Scholar

Energy Ministry. (2013). Balance National de Energía 2012. Santiago de Chile. www.minenergia.cl/documentos/balance-energetico.html (accessed 10.11.2018).Google Scholar

ES 2050. (2018). Energy System 2050: A Contribution of the Research Field Energy. www.helmholtz.de/en/research/energy/energy_system_2050/ (accessed 26.4.2018).Google Scholar

Fuss, M., Vasconcelos Barros, R. T., & Poganietz, W. R. (2018). Designing a framework for municipal solid waste management towards sustainability in emerging economy countries: An application to a case study in Belo Horizonte (Brazil). Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, pp. 655–664.Google Scholar

Grunwald, A., Coenen, R., Nitsch, J., Sydow, A., & Wiedemann, P. (2001). Forschungswerkstatt Nachhaltigkeit: Wege zur Diagnose und Therapie von Nachhaltigkeitsdefiziten. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar

Hartlieb, N., Bräutigam, K.-R., Kopfmüller, J., Sardeman, G., Achternbosch, M., & Kupsch, C. (2012). Das Nachhaltigkeitskonzept im Kontext der Abfallwirtschaft. Anwendung auf das Beispiel der Cadmiumstoffströme. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 213–233.Google Scholar

Hartmuth, G., Huber, K., & Rink, D. (2012). Downscaling von Nachhaltigkeit: Das Integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept als Bauplan für kommunale Indikatorensysteme. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, D., Krellenberg, K., Hansjürgens, B., & Martínez, F. (2012). Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Jörissen, J., Coenen, R., & Stelzer, V. (2005). Zukunftsfähiges Wohnen und Bauen. Herausforderungen, Defizite, Strategien. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar

Justen, A., Martinez, F., Lenz, B., & Cortés, C. (2012). Santiago 2030: Perspectives on the urban transport system. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 207–227.Google Scholar

Kopfmüller, J. (2006). Das integrative Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Motivation, Architektur, Perspektiven. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edtion sigma, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar

Kopfmüller, J. (2011). The integrative sustainability concept of the Helmholtz Association. The “Risk Habitat Megacity” project as a case of application. In: Banse, G, Nelson, G. L., & Parodi, O (eds.), Sustainable Development – The Cultural Perspective. Concepts – Aspects – Examples. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar

Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., et al. (2001). Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet. Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar

Kopfmüller, J., Barton, J., & Salas, A. (2012). How sustainable is Santiago? In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 305–326.Google Scholar

Lehn, H., McPhee, J., Vogdt, J., et al. (2012). Risks and opportunities for sustainable management of water resources and services in Santiago de Chile. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 251–278.Google Scholar

Ministry of Planning. (2006). Final results of energy sector in metropolitan region, year 2006. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar

MINVU – Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo (2006). Manual de aplicación, Reglamentación térmica. MINVU e Instituto de la Contrucción. Santiago de Chile. www.sodal.cl/files/1_Manual%20A%20 R%20 T.pdf (accessed 10.11.2018).Google Scholar

National Institute of Statistics (2011). Electric generation and distribution. Historical series: Electric distribution by sector in GWh, years 1997–2010. Santiago de Chile. www.ine.cl/canales/chile_estadistico/estadisticas_economicas/energia/series_estadisticas/series_estadisticas.php (accessed 10.11.2018).Google Scholar

Nayono, S., Lehmann, A., Kopfmüller, J., & Lehn, H. (2016). Improving sustainability by technology assessment and systems analysis: The case of IWRM Indonesia. Applied Water Science, 6(3), 279–292. DOI:http://0.1007/s13201-016-0427-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parodi, O. (2008). Technik am Fluss: Philosophische und kulturwissenschaftliche Betrachtungen zum Wasserbau als kulturelle Unternehmung. Munich: oekom.Google Scholar

Paulesich, R. (2012). EaseyX. Der HGF-Ansatz in einem Modell zur Bewertung börsennotierter Unternehmen. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 189–212.Google Scholar

Quevedo, D.L. (Ed.) (2010). Escenarios Energéticos Chile 2030. Santiago de Chile.Google Scholar

Quitzow, R., Ollier, L., Bangert, A., et al. (2018). Multikriterieller Bewertungsansatz für eine nachhaltige Energiewende: Von der Analyse zur Entscheidungsfindung mit ENavi. Potsdam: IAAS.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rösch, C., Raab, K., Skarka, J., & Stelzer, V. (2007). Energie aus dem Grünland: Eine nachhaltige Entwicklung? Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis. www.itas.kit.edu/english/num_completed_roes03_gruen.php (accessed 12.10.2018).Google Scholar

Rösch, C., Skarka, J., Raab, K., & Stelzer, V. (2009). Energy production from grassland: Assessing the sustainability of different process chains under German conditions. Biomass & Bioenergy, 33(4), 689–700. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.10.008.Google Scholar

Rösch, C., Bräutigam, K. -R., Kopfmüller, J., Stelzer, V., & Lichtner, P. (2017). Indicator system for the sustainability assessment of the German energy system and its transition. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7(1), 1–13. DOI:10.1186/s13705-016-0103-y.Google Scholar

Rösch, C., Bräutigam, K. -R., Kopfmüller, J., Stelzer, V., Lichtner, P., & Fricke, A. (2018). Indicator-based Sustainability Assessment of the German Energy System and its Transition. Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Schäfer, M. (2012). Der Beitrag wirtschaftlicher Akteure zu nachhaltiger Entwicklung und Lebensqualität. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 115–137.Google Scholar

Schidler, S. (2012). Interdisziplinäre Bildung von Nachhaltigkeitskriterien. Fallbeispiel Nachwachsende Rohstoffe: Grüne Bioraffinerie. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar

Schultz, J., Brand, F., Kopfmüller, J., & Ott, K. (2008). Building a “theory of sustainable development”: Two salient conceptions within the German discourse. International Journal for Environment and Sustainable Development, 7(4), 465–482. DOI:10.1504/IJESD.2008.022390.Google Scholar

Schumacher, U., Bonas, I., & Tisch, A. (2012): Gemeinschaftseinrichtungen zur nachhaltigen Entwicklung in Brandenburg. In Kopfmüller, J (ed.), Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand: Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar

Simon, S., Stelzer, V., Quintero, A., et al. (2010). Thematic field: Energy. In Krellenberg, K, Kopfmüller, J, & Barton, J (eds.), How Sustainable is Santiago de Chile? Current Performance – Future Trends – Potential Measures: Synthesis Report of the Risk Habitat Megacity Research Initiative (2007–2011). Leipzig: UFZ.Google Scholar

Simon, S., Stelzer, V., Vargas, L., Gonzalo, P., Quintero-Márquez, A., & Kopfmüller, J. (2012). Energy systems. In Heinrichs, D, Krellenberg, K, Hansjürgens, B, & Martínez, F (eds.), Risk Habitat Megacity. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar

Spangenberg, J. (2005). Die ökonomische Nachhaltigkeit der Wirtschaft. Theorien, Kriterien und Indikatoren. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar

Stelzer, V., Kopfmüller, J., & Simon, S. (2010). Nachhaltige Energieversorgung in Megacities. Das Beispiel Santiago de Chile. Technikfolgenabschätzung Theorie und Praxis, 19(3), 30–38.Google Scholar

Stelzer, V., Knapp, M., Meyer, R., & Pehle, A. (2017). Integrative sustainability assessment to evaluate OUI biomass scenarios over URR. In Schumacher, K, Fichtner, K. W., and Schultmann, F (eds.), Innovations for Sustainable Biomass Utilisation in the Upper Rhine Region. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing, pp. 218–226.Google Scholar

Stelzer, V., Quintero, A., Vargas, L., et al. (2014). Indicator based sustainability analysis of future energy situation of Santiago de Chile. In Awrejcewicz, J, Shitikova, M, Niola, V, Panagopoulos, T, Wenzel, W, Gorunescu, F, Horova, I, & Korobeinikov, A (eds.), Energy, Environment, Biology and Biomedicine. Prague: WSEAS – World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society. ISBN: 978–1-61804–232-3, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar

UN – United Nations (1992a). Agenda 21. New York: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed 12.10.2018).Google Scholar

UN – United Nations (1992b). Report of the United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992, Annex I, Rio declaration on environment and development. A/CONF.151/26(I). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

UN – United Nations (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations. www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ (accessed 12.10.2018).Google Scholar

WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakshi, B. R., Gutowski, T., & Sekulic, D. (Eds.). (2011). Thermodynamics and the Destruction of Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976049.Google Scholar

Berardi, U. (2012). Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating systems and rated buildings. Sustainable Development, 20(6), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.532.Google Scholar

Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Feola, G., & Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, B. (2020a). System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–64.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., Schmid, A., & Steinberger, J. K. (2012). Sustainability solution space of the Swiss milk value added chain. Ecological Economics, 83, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.022.Google Scholar

Binder, C. R., & Wiek, A. (2007). The role of transdisciplinary processes in sustainability assessment of agricultural systems. In Binder, C. R. & Wiek, A, From Common Principles to Common Practice: Proceedings and Outputs of the First Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA). Bern: International Institute of Sustainable Development and Swiss College of Agriculture, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar

Boesch, A., & de Montmollin, A. (2020). Indicators for assessing the sustainability of cities. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–331.Google Scholar

Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for Sustainable Development: Theory, Method, Applications: A Report to the Balaton group. Winnipeg: IISD.Google Scholar

Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: “Our Common Future.” United Nations.Google Scholar

European Commission, Directorate-General for the Environment, Intrasoft International, University of the West of England (UWE), & Science Communication Unit. (2017). Indicators for Sustainable Cities.Google Scholar

Fritz, L. & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessments: An analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar

Halla, P., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–29.Google Scholar

Hashemian, B., Massaro, E., Bojic, I., Arias, J. M., Sobolevsky, S., & Ratti, C. (2017). Socioeconomic characterization of regions through the lens of individual financial transactions. PloS one, 12(11), e0187031.Google Scholar

Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006.Google Scholar

Kangas, P. C. (2002). Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Center for Environmental Policy.Google Scholar

Klopp, J. M., & Petretta, D. L. (2017). The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019.Google Scholar

Massaro, E., Athanassiadis, A., Psyllidis, A., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Ontology-based integration of urban sustainability indicators. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 332–350.Google Scholar

Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). The value-loadedness of sustainability: Implications for the transformative potential of sustainability assessments. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar

Merino-Saum, A. (2020). Assessing sustainability through participatory multi-criteria approaches (PMCAs): An updated comparative analysis. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–238.Google Scholar

Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023.Google Scholar

Nijkamp, P., & Vreeker, R. (2000). Sustainability assessment of development scenarios: Methodology and application to Thailand. Ecological Economics, 33(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00135-4.Google Scholar

Pagani, A., Laurenti, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Sustainability assessment of the housing system: Exploring the interplay between the material system and the social structure. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 384–416.Google Scholar

Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable – And why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4–6), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4.Google Scholar

Schilling, T., Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020). A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–138.Google Scholar

Scholz, R. W., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Sciubba, E. (2008). Exergy destruction as an ecological indicator. In Encyclopedia of Ecology. pp. 1510–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00107-5.Google Scholar

Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007.Google Scholar

Stelzer, V., & Kopfmüller, J. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–180.Google Scholar

UN-Habitat. (2012). The State of the World’s Cities 2012/2013: Prosperity of Cities. http://unhabitat.org/books/prosperity-of-cities-state-of-the-worlds-cities-20122013/.Google Scholar

Waheed, B., Khan, F., & Veitch, B. (2009). Linkage-based frameworks for sustainability assessment: Making a case for Driving Force-Pressure-State-Exposure-Effect-Action (DPSEEA) frameworks. Sustainability, 1(3), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1030441.Google Scholar

Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009.Google Scholar

Williams, B., & Hummelbrunner, R. (2011). Systems Concepts In Action: A Practitioner’s Toolkit. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univesity Press. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10459535.Google Scholar

Alberti, M., & Susskind, L. (1996). Managing urban sustainability: An introduction to the Special Issue. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J. M., & Boulaire, C. (1998). A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15, 15–32.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., Vaughan, N. E., & Lenton, T. M. (2013). Opening up geoengineering appraisal: Multi-criteria mapping of options for tackling climate change. Global Environmental Change, 23, 926–937.Google Scholar

Bromley, D. W. (2007). Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability: Moving beyond “market failure.” Ecological Economics, 63, 676–683.Google Scholar

Bromley, D. W., & Paavola, J. (2002). Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy. In Bromley, D. W. & Paavola, J, (eds.), Economics, Ethics, and Environmental Policy: Contested Choices. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 261–276.Google Scholar

Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63.Google Scholar

Chamaret, A. (2007). Une démarche top‐down / bottom‐up pour l”évaluation en termes multicritères et multiacteurs des projets miniers dans l”optique du développement durable. Application sur les mines d”Uranium d”Arlit (Niger). PhD Dissertation. University of Versailles Saint‐Quentin-en‐ Yvelines, Guyancourt.Google Scholar

Cole, J., Sharvelle, S., Grigg, N., Pivo, G., & Haukaas, J. (2018). Collaborative, risk-informed, triple bottom line, multi-criteria decision analysis planning framework for integrated urban water management. Water, 10(12), 1722.Google Scholar

De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation: An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34, 267–282.Google Scholar

De Montis, A., De Toro, P., Droste-Franke, B., Omann, I., & Stagl, S. (2000). Criteria for quality assessment of MCDA methods. Paper presented at the 3^rd Conference of the ESEE, May 3–6, Vienna.Google Scholar

De Montis, A., & Lai, S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation and planning support choosing among alternative scenarios for an urban natural park in Sardinia, Italy. In Vreeker, R, Deakin, M, & Curwell, S (eds.), Sustainable Urban Development, Volume 3: The Toolkit for Assessment, London: Routledge, pp. 62–82.Google Scholar

Da Cunha, C. (2010). Quelle prise en compte de la diversité dans les enjeux de performances de l’activité agricole en Ile de France? : expérimentation d’une démarche d’évaluation participative multicritère. PhD Dissertation. University of Versailles Saint‐Quentin-en‐ Yvelines, Guyancourt.Google Scholar

Dodgson, J., Spackman, M., Pearman, A., & Phillips, L. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar

Domenèch, L., March, H., & Saurí, D. (2011). Degrowth initiatives in the urban water sector? A social multi-criteria evaluation of non-conventional water alternatives in Metropolitan Barcelona. Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 44–55.Google Scholar

Finco, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2001). Pathways to urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3, 289–302.Google Scholar

Foster, J. (Ed.). (1997). Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment, Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Gamboa, G. (2006). Social multi-criteria evaluation of different development scenarios of the Aysén region, Chile. Ecological Economics, 59, 157–170.Google Scholar

Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessments: an analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar

Gamboa, G., & Munda, G. (2007). The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy, 35, 1564–1583.Google Scholar

Garmendia, E., Gamboa, G., Franco, J., Garmendia, J. M., Liria, P., & Olazabal, M. (2010). Social multi-criteria evaluation as a decision support tool for integrated coastal zone management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53(7), 385–403.Google Scholar

Gerber, J. -F., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Yánez, I., et al. (2012). Guide to Multicriteria Evaluation for Environmental Justice Organisations. EJOLT Report No. 8, 45 p.Google Scholar

Giampietro, M. (2002). Complexity and Scales: The Challenge for Integrated Assessment. Integrated Assessment, 3(2–3), 247–265.Google Scholar

Godard, O. (2004). La pensée économique face à la question de l”environnement. Cahiers du Laboratoire d”Econométrie de l”Ecole Polytechnique, Cahier n° 2004–013, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau.Google Scholar

Gregory, R., Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1993). Valuing Environmental Resources: A Constructive Approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 177–197.Google Scholar

Guitouni, A., & Martel, J. M. (1998). Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. European Journal of Operational Research. 109, 501–521.Google Scholar

Halla, P., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Conceptualising Urban Systems for Sustainability Assessment: Four Powerful Metaphors. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 241–260.Google Scholar

Hansen, S. F. (2010). Multicriteria mapping of stakeholder preferences in regulating nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12, 1959–1970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Jacobs, M. ([1991] 1997). La Economía Verde. Medio Ambiente, Desarrollo Sostenible y la Política del Futuro. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar

Janssen, R., & Munda, G. (1999). Multi-criteria methods for quantitative, qualitative and fuzzy evaluation problem. In van den Bergh, J (ed.), Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 837–852.Google Scholar

Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., & Hokkanen, J. (2000). Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 26(6), 595–605.Google Scholar

Landert, J., Schader, C., Moschitz, H., & Stolze, M. (2017). A holistic sustainability assessment method for urban food system governance. Sustainability, 9, 490.Google Scholar

Liu, S., Proctor, W., & Cook, D. (2010). Using an integrated fuzzy set and deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach to facilitate decision-making in invasive species management. Ecological Economics, 69(12), 2374–2382.Google Scholar

Lockwood, M. (1999). Humans valuing nature: synthesising insights from philosophy, psychology and economics, Environmental Values, 8, 381–401.Google Scholar

Lupo, T., & Cusumano, M. (2018). Towards more equity concerning quality of Urban Waste Management services in the context of cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1324–1341.Google Scholar

Martel, J. M., & Rousseau, A. (1993). Cadre de référence d’une démarche multicritère de gestion intégrée des ressources en milieu forestier. Rapport préparé pour le Gouvernement du Québec, Ministère du loisir, de la chasse et de la pêche, Ministère des Forêts et Ministère de l’Environnement, document technique 93/11, 49 pages.Google Scholar

Martí, N. (2005). La multidimensionalidad de los sistemas locales de alimentación en los Andes peruanos: los chalayplasa del Valle de Lares (Cusco). PhD Dissertation. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar

Martínez-Alier, J., Munda, G., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological Economics. Ecological Economics, 26, 277–286.Google Scholar

Martínez-Alier, J., & Roca, J. ([2000] 2001). Economía Ecológica y Política Ambiental, México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

Maxim, L. (2008). Mobilisation d’un outil multimédia d’aide à la délibération pour l’analyse socio‐économique des changements de la biodiversité. Réflexions autour de trois études de cas, à l’échelle régionale (Île‐de‐France), nationale (France) et continentale (Europe). PhD Dissertation. University of Versailles Saint‐Quentin-en‐ Yvelines, Guyancourt.Google Scholar

Merino-Saum, A. (2015). Vivre avec le feu en région méditerranéenne. Une approche participative multicritère et multi-scénarios appliquée au cas du massif des Maures (Var, France). PhD Dissertation. University of Versailles Saint‐Quentin-en‐ Yvelines, Guyancourt.Google Scholar

McDowall, W., & Eames, M. (2006). Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: A multi-criteria mapping of the UKSHEC hydrogen futures. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar

Millstone, E., & Lobstein, T. (2007). The PorGrow project: Overall cross-national results, comparisons and implications. Obesity Reviews, 8, 29–36.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2003). Multicriteria assessment. In Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. International Society for Ecological Economics.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2004a). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 662–677.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2004b). Multi-criteria evaluation. In Proops, J & Safonov, P (eds.), Modelling in Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 130–154.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2006). Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy, 23, 86–94.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2008). Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Munda, G. (2009). A conflict analysis approach for illuminating distributional issues in sustainability policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 307–322.Google Scholar

Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2003). Mathematical modelling of composite indicators for ranking countries, Proceedings of the First OECD/JRC Workshop on Composite Indicators of Country Performance, JRC, Ispra.Google Scholar

Munda, G., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). Qualitative multicriteria methods for fuzzy evaluation problems: An illustration of economic-ecological evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 79–97.Google Scholar

Munda, G., & Russi, D. (2008). Social multicriteria evaluation of conflict over rural electrification and solar energy in Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 712–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., Voogd, H. (1991). Multicriteria Analysis for Physical Planning.Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M. (1997). Environmental valuation: From the point of view of sustainability. In Dragun, A. K. & Jakobsson, M. J. (eds.), Sustainability and Global Environmental Policy: New Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.149–178.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M. (2000). Pathways for environmental evaluation: A walk in the (Hanging) Gardens of Babylon. Ecological Economics, 34, 175–193.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M. (2006). Deliberative Sustainability Assessment: Multiple Scales, Multiple Stakeholders, Multidisciplinarity and Multiple Bottom Lines. Rapport de Recherche du C3ED, University of Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Guyancourt.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M. (2007). Deliberative Sustainability Assessment with the on line KerDST Deliberation Support Tool. Cahiers du C3ED, n°07–03, University of Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Guyancourt.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M., Faucheux, S., Froger, G., Funtowicz, S., & Munda, G. (1996). Emergent complexity and procedural rationality: Post-normal science for sustainability. In Constanza, R, Segura, O, & Martínez-Alier, J (eds.), Getting down to Earth, Island Press, Washington DC: International Society of Ecological Economics, pp. 223–247.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M., van den Hove, S. O’Neill, J., & Hue, C. (2001). Le Modèle Politique de la Démocratie Délibérative, Documentation interne du C3ED.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2007). A methodology for CSR reporting: Assuring a representative diversity of indicators across stakeholders, scales, sites and performance issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(13), 1399–1415.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M., Small, B., & Wedderburn, M. E. (2010). Sustainable Agriculture in Aotearoa: Social Learning through Piecewise Deliberation. REEDS Working Papers series 2010–10, Université de Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Rambouillet.Google Scholar

Omann, I. (2004). Multi-criteria decision aid as an approach for sustainable development analysis and implementation. PhD Dissertation, University of Graz.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (1993). Ecology, Policy and Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. (1997). Value pluralism, incommensurability and institutions. In Foster, J (ed.), Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment. London: Routledge, pp. 75–88.Google Scholar

Paneque Salgado, P., Quintana, S. C., Guimaraes Pereira, A., Del Moral, Ituarte, L., & Pedregal Mateos, B. (2009). Participative multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation of water governance alternatives: A case in the Costa del Sol (Málaga). Ecological Economics, 68, 990–1005.Google Scholar

Proctor, W. (2009). Environmental Decision Making: An application of Multi-criteria Analysis to a Case Study of Australia’s Forests. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Proctor, W., & Dreschler, M. (2006). Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 169–190.Google Scholar

Quintana, S. C. (2001). Una Metodología integrada de exploración y compensión de los procesos de elaboración de políticas públicas. PhD Dissertation. University of La Laguna.Google Scholar

Rauschmayer, F., & Wittmer, H. (2006). Evaluating deliberative and analytical methods for the resolution of environmental conflicts. Land Use Policy, 23, 108–122.Google Scholar

Ravetz, J. (2000). Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 31–64.Google Scholar

Reichel, V., Chamaret, A., & O’Connor, M. (2010). Les Avenirs de la Boucle de Moisson : un projet de réflexion participative pour un développement territorial soutenable. Rapport de Recherche REEDS n° 2010‐06, University of Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Rambouillet.Google Scholar

Remvikos, Y., Mahamat, A., & Reichel, V. (2010). L’interface science/décision au travers d’une évaluation multicritères et multi-acteurs du plan régional pour la qualité de l’air en Ile-de-France, Cahiers du Centre REEDS n° 2010–12, University of Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Rambouillet.Google Scholar

Renn, O. (1986). Decision analytic tools for resolving uncertainty in the energy debate. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 93(2–3), 167–180.Google Scholar

Renn, O. (2003). Social assessment of waste energy utilization scenarios. Energy, 28, 1345–1357.Google Scholar

Renn, O. (2006). Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy, 23, 34–43.Google Scholar

Renn, O., & Webler, T. (1992). Anticipating Conflicts: Public Participation in Managing the Solid Waste Crisis. GAIA, 2, 84–94.Google Scholar

Renn, O., Webler, T., Horst, R., Dienel, P., & Johnson, B. (1993). Public participation in decision-making: A three-step procedure. Policy Science, 26, 189–214.Google Scholar

Renn, O., Webler, T., & Kastenholz, , H. (1996). Procedural and substantive fairness in landfill siting: A Swiss Case Study. RISK: Health, Safety & Environment, 7(2), 145–168.Google Scholar

Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritère à la décision: méthodes et cas. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Roy, B., & Vincke, P. (1981). Multicriteria analysis: Survey and new directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 8, 207–218.Google Scholar

Royuela, J. B., Eames, M., & Buckingham, S. (2016). “Participative foresight scenario mapping”: Adapting an MCM method to appraise foresight scenarios for the long-term sustainable development of a small island. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 6(2), 118–137.Google Scholar

Sagoff, M. (1998). Aggregation and deliberation in valuing environmental public goods: A look beyond contingent pricing. Ecological Economics, 24, 213–230.Google Scholar

Schkade, D. A., & Payne, J. W. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88–109.Google Scholar

Schneider, E., Oppermann, B., Renn, O. (1998). Implementing structured participation for regional level waste management planning. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 9, 379–395.Google Scholar

Scolobig, A., Castán Broto, V., & Zabala, A. (2008). Integrating multiple perspectives in social multicriteria evaluation of flood-mitigation alternatives: The case of Malborghetto-Valbruna. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 1143–1161.Google Scholar

Spash, C. (2008). Contingent valuation design and data treatment: If you can’t shoot the messenger, change the message. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 34–53.Google Scholar

Stagl, S. (2003). Multicriteria Evaluation and Public Participation: In Search for Theoretical Foundations. Paper presented at the ESEE Conference (European Society for Ecological Economics), Tenerife, Spain, 12–15 February.Google Scholar

Stagl, S. (2006). Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: the case of UK energy policy. Land Use Policy, 23, 53–62.Google Scholar

Stagl, S. (2007). Emerging Methods for Sustainability Valuation and Appraisal. Rapid Research and Evidence Reviews, The Sustainable Development Research Network.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. (1997). Multi-criteria mapping: Mitigating the problems of environmental valuation? In Foster, J (ed.), Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment. London: Routledge, pp. 186–210.Google Scholar

Stirling, A. (2005). Multi-Criteria Mapping: A Detailed Interview Protocol. Unpublished technical report.Google Scholar

Stirling, A., & Mayer, S. (1999). Rethinking Risk: A Pilot Multi-criteria Mapping of a Genetically Modified Crop in Agricultural Systems in the UK. University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit.Google Scholar

Stirling, A., & Mayer, S. (2000). A precautionary approach to technology appraisal? A multi-criteria mapping of genetic modification in UK agriculture. SCHWERPUNKTHEMA, 3(9), 39–51.Google Scholar

Vatn, A. (2005a). Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Vatn, A. (2005b). Rationality, institutions and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 55, 203–217.Google Scholar

Vatn, A., & Bromley, D. W. (1994). Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 129–148.Google Scholar

Walter, M., Latorre Tomás, S., Munda, G., & Larrea, C. (2016). A social multi-criteria evaluation approach to assess extractive and non-extractive scenarios in Ecuador: Intag case study. Land Use Policy, 57, 444–458.Google Scholar

Whitehead, M. (2003). (Re)Analysing the sustainable city: Nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Studies, 40(7), 1183–1206.Google Scholar