Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).

People v. Harley Blankenship, 16 Cal. App. 2d 606 (1936).

Anonymous interviewees (four)

Brown, Ernest, September 5, 2003, Lumberton, NC

Bullivant, Gordon (Executive Director, Foothills Academy, Calgary), October 16, 2003, Calgary, AB

Faulds, Jon (attorney for plaintiffs in class action suit), October 17, 2003, Edmonton, AB

Hayes, Velma, July 21, 2003, Portland, OR

Heath, Dennis, July 19, 2003, Portland, OR

Hern, Warren, June 2003, Boulder, CO

Lampard, Robert, October 17, 2003, Red Deer, AB

Lovrien, Everett W., July 22, 2003, Fairview, OR

Lynch, Bill (Council on Developmental Disabilities), July 16, 2003, Portland, OR

Lytton, Judy, October 19, 2003, Edmonton, AB

McNeil, Ted, May 16, 2003, Portland, OR

Morris, Ruth, July 22, 2003, Eugene, OR

Muir, Leilani, October 18, 2003, Edmonton, AB

Murphy, John (President, Portland Habilitation Center), July 21, 2003, Portland, OR

Nelson, Ken, October 14, 2003, Edmonton, AB

Newman, Ken, July 18, 2003, Portland, OR

Throckhorn, Laverne, July 17, 2003, Portland, OR

Uditsky, Bruce (CEO, Alberta Association for Community Living), Edmonton, AB, October 18, 2003

West, William (Adult and Family Case Coordinator, Association for Retarded Citizens [ARC]), Portland, OR, July 16–18, 2003

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers, 2012.Google Scholar

Allen, Robert Loring.Irving Fisher: A Biography. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar

Allen, William R.Review of Irving Fisher: A Biography, by Allen, Robert Loring. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17, no. 1 (1995): 153–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applebaum, Nancy, MacPherson, Anne S., and Rosemblatt, Karin Alejandra, eds. Race and Nation in Modern Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.

Baker, Jean H.Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion. New York: Hill and Wang, 2011.Google Scholar

Baker-Benfield, G. J.The Horrors of the Half-Known Life: Male Attitudes Toward Women and Sexuality in Nineteenth Century America. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.Google Scholar

Baragar, C. A., Davidson, G. A., McAlister, W. J., and McCullough, D. L.. “Sexual Sterilization: Four Years Experience in Alberta.” American Journal of Psychiatry 91, no. 5 (1935): 897–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, William J. “Irving Fisher (1867–1947): Career Highlights and Formative Influences.” In The Economics of Irving Fisher: Reviewing the Scientific Work of a Great Economist, edited by Loef, Hans-E. and Monissen, Hans G., 3–21. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1999.Google Scholar

Barkan, Elazar.The Retreat of Scientific Racism: Changing Concepts of Race in Britain and the United States between the Two World Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Barker, David. “The Biology of Stupidity: Genetics, Eugenics and Mental Deficiency in the Inter-War Years.” British Journal of the History of Science 22, no. 3 (1989): 347–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philippa, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Baumgartner, Frank R.Conflict and Rhetoric in French Policymaking. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank R. , and Jones, Bryan D.. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Baur, Erwin, Fischer, Eugen, and Lenz, Fritz. Grundriss der menschlichen Erblichkeitslehre und Rassenhygiene. 2 vols. Munich: J. F. Lehmanns Verlag, 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bearman, Peter, ed. “Exploring Genetics and Social Structure.” Special issue, American Journal of Sociology 114, no. S1 (2008).CrossRef

Béland, Daniel and Cox, Robert H., eds. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Berman, Sheri. “Ideas, Norms and Culture in Political Analysis.” Comparative Politics 33, no. 2 (2001): 231–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bess, Michael.Choices under Fire: Moral Dimensions of World War II. New York: Knopf, 2006.Google Scholar

Bessel, Richard.Germany 1945: From War to Peace. New York: Harper, 2009.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A., Rhodes, R. A. W., and Rockman, Bert A., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Black, Edwin.War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 2003.Google Scholar

Bliven, Bruce. “A Gloomy Prophecy.” New Republic 131, no. 7 (August 16, 1954): 20.Google Scholar

Bloom, Mark. “Sterilization Guidelines: 22 Months on the Shelf.” Medical World News, November 9, 1973.

Blyth, Mark. “Any More Bright Ideas? The Ideational Turn in Comparative Political Economy.” Comparative Politics 29, no. 2 (1997): 229–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, Gisela. “Racism and Sexism in Nazi Germany: Motherhood, Compulsory Sterilization and the State.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 8, no. 3 (1983): 400–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, Gisela.Zwangssterilisation im Nationalsozialismus. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar

Braslow, Joel T. “In the Name of Therapeutics: The Practice of Sterilization in a California State Hospital.” Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences 51, no. 1 (1996): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braslow, Joel T.Mental Ills and Bodily Cures: Psychiatric Treatment in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Broberg, Gunnar, and Roll-Hansen, Nils, eds. Eugenics and the Welfare State: Sterilization Policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996.

Bruinius, Harry.Better for All the World: The Secret History of Forced Sterilization and America’s Quest for Racial Purity. New York: Knopf, 2006.Google Scholar

Burleigh, Michael.Death and Deliverance: “Euthanasia” in Germany, c. 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Burleigh, Michael. “Eugenic Utopias and the Genetic Present.” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 1, no. 1 (2000): 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burleigh, Michael.The Third Reich: A New History. London: Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar

Cahn, Susan K.Sexual Reckonings: Southern Girls in a Troubling Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, Elof Axel.The Unfit: A History of a Bad Idea. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Caron, Simone M.Who Chooses? American Reproductive History since 1830. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castles, Katherine. “Quiet Eugenics: Sterilization in North Carolina’s Institutions for the Mentally Retarded, 1945–1965.” Journal of Southern History 68, no. 4 (2002): 849–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattel, Raymond B.The Fight for Our National Intelligence. London: P. S. King & Son, 1937.Google Scholar

Chesterton, G. K.Eugenics and Other Evils: An Argument against the Scientifically Organized Society. Seattle: Inkling Books, 2000. First published 1922 by Cassel, London.Google Scholar

Collins, Ronald K. L., ed. The Fundamental Holmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRef

Connelly, Mark T.The Response to Prostitution in the Progressive Era. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Connelly, Matthew.Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cook, Robert C.Human Fertility: The Modern Dilemma. New York: W. Sloane, 1951.Google Scholar

Crackenthorpe, Montague H.Population and Progress. London: Chapman and Hall, 1907.Google Scholar

Crane, R. Newton. “Recent Eugenic and Social Legislation in America.” Eugenics Review 10, no. 1 (April 1918): 24–9.Google Scholar

Critchlow, Donald T.Intended Consequences: Birth Control, Abortion, and the Federal Government in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

D’Antonio, Michael.The State Boys Rebellion. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004.Google Scholar

Darwin, Francis. ed., The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1887.

Darwin, Charles Galton.The Next Million Years. London: R. Hart-Davis, 1952.Google Scholar

Decker, Julio. “The Immigration Restriction League and the Political Regulation of Immigration, 1894–1924.” Ph.D. diss., University of Leeds, 2012.

Degler, Carl N.In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. New York, Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

DeWolfe Howe, Mark, ed. Holmes-Laski Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Harold J. Laski, 1916–1935. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.CrossRef

DeWolfe Howe, Mark, ed. Holmes-Pollock Letters: The Correspondence of Mr. Justice Holmes and Sir Frederick Pollock, 1874–1932. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1941.

Dickinson, Robert L. “Sterilization without Unsexing.” Journal of the American Medical Association 92, no. 5 (1929): 373–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dorr, Gregory M.Segregation’s Science: Eugenics and Society in Virginia. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Dowbiggin, Ian R.Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada, 1880–1940. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Dowbiggin, Ian R.A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Dowbiggin, Ian R.“ ‘A Rational Coalition’: Euthanasia, Eugenics, and Birth Control in America, 1940–1970.” Journal of Social Policy History 14, no. 3 (2002): 223–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowbiggin, Ian R.The Sterilization Movement and Global Fertility in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Paul R.The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine, 1968.Google Scholar

Evans, Richard J.The Coming of the Third Reich. London: Allen Lane, 2003.Google Scholar

Evans, Richard J.The Third Reich in Power. London: Allen Lane, 2005.Google Scholar

Evans, Richard J.The Third Reich at War. New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar

Fangerau, Heiner.Etablierung eines Rassenhygienischen Standardwerkes 1924–1941: der Baur-Fischer-Lenz im Spiegel der zeitgenössischen Rezensionsliteratur. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2001.Google Scholar

Fogarty, Gerald P.Commonwealth Catholicism: A History of the Catholic Church in Virginia. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Franks, Angela.Margaret Sanger’s Eugenic Legacy: The Control of Female Fertility. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., 2005.Google Scholar

Freeden, Michael. “Eugenics and Progressive Thought: A Study in Ideological Affinity.” Historical Journal 22, no. 3 (1979): 645–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallagher, Nancy L.Breeding Better Vermonters: The Eugenics Project in the Green Mountain State. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1999.Google Scholar

Gamble, Clarence, and Richardson, William P.. “The Sterilization of the Insane and Mentally Deficient in North Carolina.” North Carolina Medical Journal 8, no. 1 (January 1947): 19–21.Google Scholar

Gerstle, Gary.American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Gerstle, Gary. “The Resilient Power of the States across the Long Nineteenth Century: An Inquiry into a Pattern of American Governance.” In Jacobs, and King, , The Unsustainable American State, 61–87. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gessler, Bernhard.Eugen Fischer (1874–1967): Leben und Werk des Freiburger Anatomen, Anthropologen und Rassenhygienikers bis 1927. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2000.Google Scholar

Gillham, Nicholas Wright.A Life of Sir Francis Galton: From African Exploration to the Birth of Eugenics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Goddard, Henry H.The Kallikak Family: A Study of the Heredity of Feeblemindedness. New York: Macmillian, 1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Linda.Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay.The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton, 1981.Google Scholar

Graham, Loren R. “Science and Values: The Eugenics Movement in Germany and Russia in the 1920s.” American Historical Review 82, no. 5 (1977): 1133–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenhalgh, Susan.Just One Child: Science and Policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grekul, Jana. “Sterilization in Alberta, 1928 to 1972: Gender Matters.” Canadian Review of Sociology 45, no. 3 (2008): 247–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grekul, Jana. “A Well-Oiled Machine: Alberta’s Eugenics Program, 1928–1972.” Alberta History 59, no. 3 (2011): 16–23.Google Scholar

Grekul, Jana. , Krahn, Harvey, and Odynak, Dave. “Sterilizing the ‘Feeble-minded’: Eugenics in Alberta, Canada 1929–1972.” Journal of Historical Sociology 17, no. 4 (2004): 358–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grob, Gerald N.The Inner World of American Psychiatry, 1890–1940: Selected Correspondence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Grob, Gerald N.The Mad Among Us: A History of the Care of America’s Mentally Ill. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Grob, Gerald N.Mental Illness and American Society, 1875–1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Grotjahn, Alfred.Die Hygiene der menschlichen Fortpflanzung: Versuch einer praktischen Eugenik. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1926.Google Scholar

Haffner, Sebastian.Geschichte eines Deutschen: die Erinnerungen 1914–1933. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2000.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter.Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Haller, Mark.Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Hansen, Bent Sigurd. “Something Rotten in the State of Denmark: Eugenics and the Ascent of the Welfare State.” In Broberg, and Roll-Hansen, , Eugenics and the Welfare State, 9–76. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hansen, Randall, and King, Desmond. “Eugenic Ideas, Political Interests, and Policy Variance: Immigration and Sterilization Policy in Britain and the US.” World Politics 53, no. 2 (2001): 237–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harkavy, Oscar, and Roy, Krishna. “Emergence of the Indian National Family Planning Program.” In The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs, edited by Robinson, Warren C. and Ross, John A., 301–24. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar

Hendricks, Melissa. “Raymond Pearl’s ‘Mingled Mess.’” Johns Hopkins Magazine 58, no. 2 (April 2006): 50–6.Google Scholar

Herlitzius, Anette.Frauenbefreiung und Rassenideologie. Rassenhygiene und Eugenik im politischen Programm der “Radikalen Frauenbewegung” (1900–1933). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar

Hern, Warren. “Biological Tyranny.” New Republic (February 27, 1971): 15–17.Google Scholar

Hodges, Jeffrey Alan. “Dealing with Degeneracy: Michigan Eugenics in Context.” Ph.D. diss., Michigan State University, 2001.

Hodgson, Dennis. “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America.” Population and Development Review 17, no. 1 (1991): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgson, Dennis. “Notestein, Frank W.” In The Encyclopedia of Population, edited by Demeny, Paul and McNicoll, Geoffrey, 1: 696. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2003.Google Scholar

Hornblum, Allen M.Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg Prison; A True Story of Abuse and Exploitation in the Name of Medical Science. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Immergut, Ellen.Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence, and King, Desmond, eds. The Unsustainable American State. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRef

Jacobson, Matthew Frye.Barbarian Virtues: The United States Encounters Peoples at Home and Abroad,1876–1917. New York: Hill and Wang, 2000.Google Scholar

Johnson, Kimberley. Governing the States: Congress and the New Federalism, 1877–1929. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Kimberley. Governing the States: Congress and the New Federalism, . Reforming Jim Crow: Southern Politics and State in the Age before Brown. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Jones, James H.Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: The Free Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Jones, Kathleen.Asylums and After: A Revised History of the Mental Health Services; From the Early 18th Century to the 1990s. London: Athlone Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Judt, Tony.Thinking the Twentieth Century. With Timothy Snyder. New York: Penguin Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kaelber, Lutz. “Eugenics: Compulsory Sterilization in 50 American States.” University of Vermont. Available at .

Kantor, William M. “Beginnings of Sterilization in America.” Journal of Heredity 28, no. 11 (1937): 374–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerlin, Isaac Newton.The Mind Unveiled; or, A Brief History of Twenty-Two Imbecile Children. Philadelphia, PA: U. Hunt and Son, 1858.Google Scholar

Kevles, Daniel J.In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kincheloe, Marsha R., and Hunt, Jr Herbert G.. Empty Beds: A History of Vermont State Hospital. Barre, VT: Northlight Studio Press, 1989.Google Scholar

King, Desmond.In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Desmond.Making Americans: Immigration, Race, and the Origin of the Diverse Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

King, Desmond. , and Hansen, Randall. “Experts at Work: State Autonomy, Social Learning and Eugenic Sterilisation in 1930s Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 29, no. 1 (1999): 77–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

King, Desmond. , and Smith, Rogers M.. “Racial Orders in American Political Development.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 1 (2005): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kline, Wendy.Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Kline, Wendy. “Eugenics in the United States.” In Bashford, and Levine, , Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, 511–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Klinkner, Philip A., and Smith, Rogers M.. The Unsteady March: The Rise and Decline of Racial Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Kluchin, Rebecca M.Fit to Be Tied: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America, 1950–1980. Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Knodel, John E.The Decline of Fertility in Germany, 1871–1939. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Kröner, Hans-Peter.Von der Rassenhygiene zur Humangenetik: Das Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Anthropologie, menschliche Erbe und Eugenik nach dem Kriege. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar

Kühl, Stefan.The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism and German National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kühl, Stefan. “The Relationship between Eugenics and the So-called ‘Euthanasia Action’ in Nazi Germany.” In Szöllösi-Janze, , Science in the Third Reich, 185–211.

Lael, Richard L., Brazos, Barbara, and McMillen, Margot Ford. Evolution of a Missouri Asylum: Fulton State Hospital 1851–2006. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lagemann, Ellen Condliffe. The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy, and Public Policy. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Lampard, Robert.Alberta’s Medical History: “Young and Lusty, and Full of Life.” Red Deer, AB: privately printed, 2008.Google Scholar

Lantzer, Jason S., and Stern, Alexandra M.. “Building a Fit Society: Indiana’s Eugenics Crusaders.” Traces of Indiana and Midwestern History 19, no. 1 (2007): 4–11.Google Scholar

Largent, Mark. “‘The Greatest Curse of the Race’: Eugenic Sterilization in Oregon, 1909–1983.” Oregon Historical Quarterly 103, no. 2 (2002): 188–209.Google Scholar

Largent, Mark.Breeding Contempt: The History of Coerced Sterilization in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Larson, Edward J.Sex, Race, and Science: Eugenics in the Deep South. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Larson, Edward J. , and Nelson, Leonard J.. “Involuntary Sexual Sterilization of Incompetent in Alabama: Past, Present and Future.” Alabama Law Review 43, no. 2 (1992): 399–444.Google Scholar

Latham, Michael E.The Right Kind of Revolution: Modernization, Development, and U.S. Foreign Policy from the Cold War to the Present. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Jane. “The Indian Health Service and the Sterilization of Native American Women.” American Indian Quarterly 24, no. 3 (2000): 400–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lenz, Fritz.Die Rasse als Wertprinzip. Zur Erneuerung der Ethik. Munich: J. F. Lehmanns Verlag, 1933.Google Scholar

Leon, Sharon M. “‘A Human Being, and Not a Mere Social Factor’: Catholic Strategies for Dealing with Sterilization Statutes in the 1920s.” Church History 73, no. 2 (2004): 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, Robert C.Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Lidbetter, E. J.Heredity and the Social Problem Group. London: E. Arnold, 1933.Google Scholar

Littlewood, Thomas B.The Politics of Population Control. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Lombardo, Paul A., ed. A Century of Eugenics in America: From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011.

Lombardo, Paul A., ed. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.

London, Gary D. “Family Planning Programs of the Office of Economic Opportunity: Scope, Operation, and Impact.” Demography 5, no. 2 (1968): 924–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Marshall, Dominique. “Children’s Rights and Children’s Action in International Relief and Domestic Welfare: The Work of Herbert Hoover between 1914 and 1950.” Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth 1, no. 3 (2008): 351–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Matthew D.. “The Dysfunctional Progeny of Eugenics: Autonomy Gone AWOL.” Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 15, no. 2 (2007): 371–421.Google Scholar

Mastin, Joseph T. Mental Defectives in Virginia: A Special Report of the State Board of Charities and Corrections to the General Assembly 1916, on Weak Mindedness in the State of Virginia; together with a Plan for the Training, Segregation and Prevention of the Procreation of the Feebleminded. Buck v Bell Documents. Paper 2. Available at .

Maynard Smith, John. “Eugenics and Utopia,” Daedalus 94, no. 2 (1965): 487–505.Google Scholar

McLaren, Angus. “The Creation of a Haven for ‘Human Thoroughbreds’: The Sterilization of the Feeble-Minded and the Mentally Ill in British Columbia.” Canadian Historical Review 67, no. 2 (1986): 127–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McLaren, Angus.Our Own Master Race: Eugenics in Canada, 1885–1945. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehta, Jal. “The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From ‘Whether’ to ‘How.’” In Béland, and Cox, , Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, 23–46. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Mennel, Robert M., and Compston, Christine L., eds. Holmes and Frankfurter: Their Correspondence, 1912–1934. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1996.

Moreno, Jonathan D.Undue Risks: Secret State Experiments on Humans. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Morison, Elting E., Blum, John Morton, and Buckley, John J., eds. The Letters of Theodore Roosevelt. 8 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951–54.

Morning, Ann. “Reconstructing Race in Science and Society: Biology Textbooks, 1952–2002.” In “Exploring Genetics and Social Structure,” edited by Bearman, Peter: 106–37. Special issue, American Journal of Sociology 114, no. S1 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mottier, Véronique. “Eugenics and the State: Policy-Making in Comparative Perspective.” In Bashford, and Levine, , Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, 134–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Müller-Hill, Benno.Murderous Science: Elimination by Scientific Selection of Jews, Gypsies, and others, Germany, 1933–1945. Translated by Fraser, George R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Originally published as Tödliche Wissenschaft: die Aussonderung von Juden, Zigeunern und Geisteskranken 1933–1945 (Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, 1984).Google Scholar

Ngai, Mae M.Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Noll, Steven.Feeble-Minded in Our Midst: Institutions for the Mentally Retarded in the South, 1900–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Noll, Steven. “The Public Face of Southern Institutions for the ‘Feeble-Minded.’” The Public Historian 27, no. 2 (2005): 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noll, Steven. “Southern Strategies for Handling the Black Feeble-Minded: From Social Control to Profound Indifference.” Journal of Policy History 3, no. 2 (1991): 130–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Notestein, Frank W. “Class Differences in Fertility.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 188, no. 1 (1936): 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, Kurt.Geschichte des Christentums in Deutschland. Munich: C.H. Beck, 1995.Google Scholar

Nyiszli, Miklos.Auschwitz: A Doctor’s Eyewitness Account. New York: Fell, 1960.Google Scholar

Ochsner, A. J. “Surgical Treatment of Habitual Criminals.” Journal of the American Medical Association 32, no. 16 (April 22, 1899): 867–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Office of Economic Opportunity, Executive Office of the President. “OEO Instruction 6130–1, May 18, 1971.” [Copy provided to authors by Dr. Warren Hern.]

Office of Policy Planning and Research. The Negro Family: The Case for National Action. U.S. Department of Labor, March 1965. Available at .

Ordover, Nancy.American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Osborn, Frederick.The Future of Human Heredity; An Introduction to Eugenics in Modern Society. New York: Weybright and Talley, 1968.Google Scholar

Overy, Richard.Interrogations: The Nazi Elite in Allied Hands, 1945. New York: Viking, 2001.Google Scholar

Paul, Diane B. “Eugenics and the Left,” in Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biometrics, and the Nature-Nature Debate. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Paul, Julius. “The Return of Punitive Sterilization Proposals: Current Attacks on Illegitimacy and the AFDC Program.” Law & Society Review 3, no. 1 (1968): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, Julius. “State Eugenic Sterilization History: A Brief Overview.” In Eugenic Sterilization, edited by Robitscher, Jonas, 25–40. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1973.Google Scholar

Paul, Julius.“Three Generations of Imbeciles Are Enough”: State Eugenic Sterilization Laws in American Thought, and Practice. Washington, DC: Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 1965.Google Scholar

Pearl, Raymond.The Biology of Population Growth, Rev. ed. New York: Knopf, 1930.Google Scholar

Pearl, Raymond. “The Biology of Superiority.” The American Mercury 12, no. 47 (1927): 257–66.Google Scholar

Peart, Hartley F.“Vasectomy and Salpingectomy under California Law,” California and Western Medicine 6 (May–June 1941): 1–8, Box 73, AVS.Google Scholar

Pernick, Martin S.The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of “Defective” Babies in American Medicine, and Motion Pictures Since 1915. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Perske, Robert.Hope for the Families: New Directions for Parents of Persons with Retardation of Other Disabilities. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (2000): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ploetz, Alfred.Die Tüchtigkeit unserer Rasse und der Schutz der Schwachen. Berlin: S. Fischer, 1895.Google Scholar

Popenoe, Paul. “The Progress of Eugenic Sterilization.” Journal of Heredity 25, no. 1 (1934): 19–26.Google Scholar

Porter, Roy.Madness: A Brief History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert. “From Anthropologie to Rassenkunde in the German Anthropological Tradition.” In Bones, Bodies, and Behavior: Essays on Biological Anthropology, edited by Stocking, Jr George W.., 138–79. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Proctor, Robert.Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Rafter, Nicole Hahn.White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies, 1877–1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Reilly, Philip R. “Involuntary Sterilization in the United States: A Surgical Solution.” Quarterly Review of Biology 62, no. 2 (1987): 153–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reilly, Philip R.The Surgical Solution: A History of Involuntary Sterilization in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Reilly, Philip R. “The Surgical Solution: The Writings of Activist Physicians in the Early Days of Eugenical Sterilization.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 26, no. 4 (1983): 637–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rein, Martin, and Schön, Donald A.. “Problem-Setting in Policy Research.” In Using Social Research in Public Policy, edited by Weiss, Carol H., 235–51. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Co., 1977.Google Scholar

ReVelle, Penelope, and ReVelle, Charles. The Global Environment: Securing a Sustainable Future. Boston: Jones and Barlett, 1992.Google Scholar

Richardson, William P., and Gamble, Clarence J.. “The Sterilization of the Insane and Mentally Deficient in North Carolina.” North Carolina Medical Journal 8, no. 1 (1947): 19–21.Google ScholarPubMed

Rissom, Renate.Fritz Lenz und die Rassenhygiene. Husum: Matthiesen, 1983.Google Scholar

Rodgers, Daniel T.Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rosen, Christine.Preaching Eugenics: Religious Leaders and the American Eugenics Movement. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenberg, Charles E. “Charles Benedict Davenport and the Beginning of Human Genetics.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 35 (1961): 266–76.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Bernard, Wolfe, Sidney M., and McGarrah, Jr Robert E.. A Health Research Group Study on Surgical Sterilization: Present Abuses and Proposed Regulations. Washington, DC: Health Research Group, 1973.Google Scholar

Ryan, Patrick J. “‘Six Blacks from Home’: Childhood, Motherhood, and Eugenics in America.” Journal of Policy History 19, no. 3 (2007): 253–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, Patrick J. “Unnatural Selection: Intelligence Testing, Eugenics and American Political Cultures.” Journal of Social History 30, no. 3 (1997): 669–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rydell, Robert W.World of Fairs: The Century-of-Progress Expositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sabbatini, Renato M. E. “The History of Shock Therapy in Psychiatry.” Available at .

Sanger, Margaret. “A Plan for Peace.” Birth Control Review 16, no. 4 (April 1932): 107–8.Google Scholar

Sanger, Margaret.An Autobiography. New York: Dover Publications, 1971.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Ronald.Wings of Judgment: American Bombing in World War II. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Vivien A. “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 2 (2002): 168–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, William H.Quality and Quantity: The Biological Request for Regeneration in Twentieth-Century France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schön, Donald A., and Rein, Martin. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Schoen, Johanna.Choice and Coercion: Birth Control, Sterilization, and Abortion in Public Health and Welfare. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Searle, G. R.Eugenics and Politics in Britain, 1900–1914. Leyden: Noordhof International Publishers, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sen, Amartya Kumar.Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Joseph P.No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Times Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. “Rational Choice Institutionalism.” In Binder, Rhodes, and Rockman, , Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, 23–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Siemens, Hermann Werner.Die biologischen Grundlagen der Rassenhygiene und der Bevölkerungspolitik. Für Gebildete aller Berufe. Munich: J. F. Lehmann, 1917.Google Scholar

Siemens, Hermann Werner.Grundzüge der Vererbungslehre, Rassenhygiene, und Bevölkerungspolitik. 8th ed. Munich: J. F. Lehmann, 1937.Google Scholar

Sieveking, G. Herman.“Sterilisierungsgesetze des Auslandes.” Deutsches Ärzteblatt 35, no. 64 (August 25, 1934): 829–31.

Simmons, Harvey G. “Explaining Social Policy: The English Mental Deficiency Act of 1913.” Journal of Social History 11, no. 3 (1978): 387–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Snyder, Timothy.Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin. New York: Basic Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Soloway, Richard A.Demography and Degeneration: Eugenics and the Declining Birthrate in Twentieth Century Britain. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Spektorowski, Alberto. “The Eugenic Temptation in Socialism: Sweden, Germany and the Soviet Union.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 46, no. 1 (2004): 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank, eds. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRef

Stepan, Alfred, and Juan, J. Linz. “Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 9, no. 4 (2011): 841–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stepan, Nancy Leys.The Hour of Eugenics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Stephens, Martha.The Treatment: The Story of Those Who Died in the Cincinnati Radiation Tests. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Alexandra M.Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Stern, Alexandra M. “From Legislation to Lived Experience: Eugenic Sterilization in California and Indiana, 1907–79.” In Lombardo, , A Century of Eugenics, 95–116. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Stern, Alexandra M. “From Mestizophilia to Biotypology: Racialization and Science in Mexico, 1920–1960.” In Applebaum, MacPherson, and Rosemblatt, , Race and Nation in Modern Latin America, 187–210. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Stern, Alexandra M. “Gender and Sexuality: A Global Tour and Compass.” In Bashford, and Levine, , Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, 173–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Stern, Alexandra M. “‘The Hour of Eugenics’ in Veracruz, Mexico: Radical Politics, Public Health, and Latin America’s only Sterilization Law.” Hispanic American Historical Review 91, no. 3 (2011): 431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Alexandra M. “Sterilized in the Name of Public Health: Race, Immigration, and Reproductive Control in Modern California.” American Journal of Public Health 95, no. 7 (2005): 1128–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stern, Alexandra M. “‘We Cannot Make a Silk Purse Out of a Sow’s Ear’: Eugenics in the Hoosier Heartland.” Indiana Magazine of History 103, no. 1 (2007): 3–38.Google Scholar

Stoddard, Lothrop.The Rising Tide of Color Against White-Supremacy. New York: Scribner, 1920.Google Scholar

Stopes, Marie C.Married Love. Edited by McKibbin, Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Stopes, Marie C.Radiant Motherhood: A Book for Those who Are Creating the Future. London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1920.Google Scholar

Strange, Carolyn, and Jennifer, A. Stephen. “Eugenics in Canada: A Checkered History, 1850s–1990s.” In Bashford, and Levine, , Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, 523–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Swift, Katherine. “Sinister Science: Eugenics, Nazism, and the Technocratic Rhetoric of the Human Betterment Foundation.” Lore 6, no. 2 (May 2008): 1–11.Google Scholar

Szöllösi-Janze, Margit, ed. Science in the Third Reich. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2001.

Thelen, Kathleen. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2, no. 1 (1999): 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen.How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Warren S. “Eugenics and the Social Good.” The Journal of Social Forces 3, no. 3 (March 1925): 414–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Mathew.The Problem of Mental Deficiency: Eugenics, Democracy, and Social Policy in Britain, c. 1870–1959. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timm, Annette F.The Politics of Fertility in Twentieth-Century Berlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tomes, Nancy.A Generous Confidence: Thomas Story Kirkbride and the Art of Asylum-Keeping, 1840–1883. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Tone, Andrea. Devices and Desires: A History of Contraception in America. New York: Hill and Wang, 2001, 271.Google Scholar

Trent, James W.. Inventing the Feeble Mind: A History of Mental Retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Trent, James W.. “‘Who shall say who is a useful person?’: Abraham Myerson’s Opposition to the Eugenics Movement.” History of Psychiatry 12, no. 45 (2001): 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trombley, Stephen.The Right to Reproduce: A History of Coercive Sterilization. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988.Google Scholar

Trudeau, Chad. F., ed. Public School Laws of Louisiana and Sanitary Regulations of the State Board of Health, 11th compilation. Baton Rouge, LA: Ramires-Jones Printing Company, 1919.

Tsebelis, George.Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turda, Marius. “Race, Science, and Eugenics in the Twentieth Century.” In Bashford, and Levine, , Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, 62–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Tydén, Mattias “The Scandinavian States: Reformed Eugenics Applied,” in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, ed. Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philippa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Valles, Sean A. “Lionel Penrose and the Concept of Normal Variation in Human Intelligence.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43, no. 1 (2012): 281–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Valone, David A. “Eugenic Science in California: Guide to E. S. Gosney Papers and Records of the Human Betterment Foundation.” Pasadena: California Institute of Technology, 1996.Google Scholar

Verschuer, Otmar.“Eugen Fischer zum 70. Geburtstag am 5. Juni 1944.” Der Erbarzt 12, nos. 5–6 (May/June 1944): 57–9.Google Scholar

Wahlsten, Douglas. “Leilani Muir versus the Philosopher King: Eugenics on Trial in Alberta.” Genetica 99, nos. 2–3 (1997): 185–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waylen, Georgina, Celis, Karen, Kantola, Johanna, and Weldon, Laurel, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRef

Weinberg, Gerhard L.A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Weindling, Paul.Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Weindling, Paul.Nazi Medicine and the Nuremburg Trials: From Medical War Crimes to Informed Consent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weindling, Paul. “The Survival of Eugenics in 20th Century Germany.” American Journal of Human Genetics 52, no. 3 (1993): 643–9.Google ScholarPubMed

Weindling, Paul. “Weimar Eugenics: The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Social Context.” Annals of Science 42, no. 3 (1985): 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingart, Peter. “German Eugenics between Science and Politics.” Osiris 2nd series, vol. 5 (1989): 260–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weiss, Sheila F. “Race and Class in Fritz Lenz’s Eugenics.” Medizinhistorisches Journal: Internationale Vierteljahresschrift für Wissenschaftsgeschichte 27, nos. 1–2 (1992): 5–25.Google ScholarPubMed

Weiss, Sheila F.Race Hygiene and National Efficiency: The Eugenics of Wilhelm Schallmayer. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Weiss, Sheila F. “The Race Hygiene Movement in Germany, 1904–1945.” In The Wellborn Science: Eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil, and Russia, edited by Adams, Mark B., 8–68. New York, Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Whitney, E. A. “Presenting Mental Deficiency to Students.” American Journal of Mental Deficiency 50, no. 1 (July 1945): 54–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Wood, H. C. “A Prescription for the Alleviation of Welfare Abuses and Illegitimacy.” Journal of the Kentucky State Medical Association 61, no. 4 (1963): 319–23.Google ScholarPubMed

Zenderland, Leila.Measuring Minds: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Origins of American Intelligence Testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ziegler, Mary. “The Framing of a Right to Choose: Roe v. Wade and the Changing Debate on Abortion Law.” Law and History Review 27, no. 2 (summer 2009): 281–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ziegler, Mary. “Reinventing Eugenics: Reproductive Choice and Law Reform after World War II.” Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender 14, no. 2 (April 2008): 319–50.Google Scholar