Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:06:03.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Dual Transition under Military Rule: The State Prevails

from PART V - MILITARY IN CHARGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

The weak state combined with competitive markets is James Buchanan's heaven; the strong state combined with atomistic markets is Deepak Lal's heaven; the weak state combined with monopolistic markets is Mancur Olson's hell; the strong state combined with monopolistic market[s] is Douglas North's hell.

The political system of Myanmar had changed four times during the twentieth century. In 1948 it changed from a colonial political system that allowed limited “home rule” to a parliamentary democracy system of majoritarian rule that mimicked the Westminster model. After the military coup of 2 March 1962, the country was ruled by decree as the ruling Revolutionary Council (RC) assumed executive, judicial, and legislative powers. From January 1974 until the military coup of 18 September 1988, a one-party socialist system that professed “democratic centralism” was in place. Thereafter, Myanmar's political system reverted back to that in which the military junta known as the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) exercised executive, legislative, and judicial powers. The military regime which has been conflated with the state appears to be determined to “bring the state back in” to play a domineering role after the latter's near-collapse in the upheaval of 1988.

In this latest round of regime change, the ruling military junta (re-established as the State Peace and Development Council, or SPDC, on 15 November 1997) has been managing a dual transition towards “multi-party electoral democracy” and a market-oriented economic system. A challenging task made more difficult because the junta's legitimacy and authority have been contested, since its inception, not only by the legally constituted political opposition and a constellation of illegal or unlawful organizations, insurgents, and expatriate groups, but also by some Western states and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as well.

Type
Chapter
Information
State Dominance in Myanmar
The Political Economy of Industrialization
, pp. 339 - 416
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×