Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T10:52:07.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Using auctions to assign spectrum

from Part II - Economic management of spectrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Martin Cave
Affiliation:
Imperial College London and the Competition Commission
William Webb
Affiliation:
Weightless SIG
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In economics, auctions form a part of a field of study more generally known as mechanism design. As Hurwicz and Reiter [1, p. 30] explain, “in a design problem, the goal function is the main ‘given,’ while the mechanism is the unknown. Therefore, the design problem is the ‘inverse’ of traditional economic theory, which is typically devoted to the analysis of the performance of a given mechanism.” In designing an auction the spectrum manager exercises a degree of discretion in pursuit of the chosen goals. This chapter discusses the properties of different types of auction design. Useful general accounts of auctions can be found in [2, 3]; on spectrum auction design see especially [4].

While the use of auctions to assign licenses is now the default position for most major spectrum award processes worldwide, before 1989 this was not the case. To understand why auctions have become so prevalent, it is useful to examine deficiencies in other processes. This is done in Section 4.3.

Some types and effects of auctions

An item up for auction can be described as having either private-value characteristics or common-value characteristics. This distinction can matter fundamentally.

In a private-value auction each bidder values an item by reference to the value it confers through consumption. For example, in deciding how much to bid for a family heirloom, a person is likely to be guided by sentimental rather than financial considerations. There is no reason why one person's valuation should be the same as another's.

By contrast, a common-value auction typically involves items that are not exclusively or chiefly used for final consumption. The key characteristic of an item in a common-value auction is that all bidders would agree on the valuation if they possessed the same objective information about the item. A good example would be a tract of land made available for drilling rights to extract oil. If all parties interested in the tract were given the same geophysical data, were to use the same extraction techniques, and estimated the same futures prices for oil, then they would each have the same belief about the valuation – in other words the valuation would be common to all bidders [5].

Type
Chapter
Information
Spectrum Management
Using the Airwaves for Maximum Social and Economic Benefit
, pp. 63 - 93
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hurwicz, L. and Reiter, S., Designing Economic Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Klemperer, P., “Auctions: Theory and Practice” (2004), Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Economics Papers.
[3] Milgrom, P. R., Putting Auction Theory to Work, Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Cramton, P., “Spectrum Auction Design” (March 2013) 42(2) Review of Industrial Organisation161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Cramton, P., “How Best to Auction Oil Rights: Escaping the Resource Curse,” in Humphreys, M., Sachs, J. D., and Stiglitz, J. E., eds., Escaping the Resource Curse, New York: Columbia University Press, 2007, 114.Google Scholar
[6] 2011 Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India for the year ended March 2010, at http://cag.gov.in/html/reports/civil/2010-11_19PA/Telecommunication%20Report.pdf.
[7] Bernheim, B. D. and Whinston, M., “Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence” (1986) 101 Quarterly Journal of Economics1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Kwerel, E. R. and Rosston, G. L., “An Insiders’ View of FCC Spectrum Auctions” (2000) 17(3) Journal of Regulatory Economics253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Park, M., Lee, S.-W., and Choi, Y.-J., “Does Spectrum Auctioning Harm Consumers? Lessons from 3G Licensing” (2011) 23(1) Information Economics and Policy118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] See www.fcc.gov/incentiveauctions.
[11] Vickrey, W., “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders” (1961) 16(1) Journal of Finance8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Bulow, J. and Klemperer, P., “Auctions versus Negotiations” (1996) 86(1) American Economic Review180.Google Scholar
[13] See www.fcc.gov/spectrum.
[14] Article 1(2) of the Radio Spectrum Decision, No. 676/2002/EC, March 7, 2002.
[15] Recital 22 of the Authorisation Directive 2002/20/EC, Brussels.
[16] See “Spectrum Auction Design in New Zealand,” Ministry of Economic Development (November 2005).
[17] Ausubel, L. M., “An Efficient Ascending-Bid Auction for Multiple Objects” (2004) 94(5) American Economic Review1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Morgan, J., “Combinatorial Auctions in the Information Age: An Experimental Study,” in Baye, Michael R., ed., The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce,Bingley: Emerald, 2002, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Cramton, P., Shohan, Y., and Steinberg, R., eds., Combinatorial Auctions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
[20] Myers, G., “Spectrum Floors in the UK 4G Auction: An Innovation in Regulatory Design,” at www.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/CARR/pdf/DPs/DP74-Geoffrey-Myers.pdf.
[21] National Audit Office, “4G Radio Spectrum Auction: Lessons Learned” (March 2014).
[22] Kwerel, E. and Williams, J., “A Proposal for a Rapid Transition to Market Allocation of Spectrum,” OPP Working Paper No. 38, Federal Communication Commission (November 2002).
[23] Alpcan, T., Boche, H., Honig, M. L., and Poor, H. V., eds., Mechanisms and Games for Dynamic Spectrum Allocation, Cambridge University Press, 2014, Chapter 15.Google Scholar
[24] NERA, “US 600 MHz Incentive Auction,” at www.nera.com/content/dam/nera/publications/2014/PUB_600MHz_Incentive_Auc_Fwd_Rev_Auc_Rules_1014.pdf.
[25] Moore, L., “Spectrum Policy: Provisions of the 2012 Spectrum Act,” Congressional Research Services (March 2014).
[26] Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. J., “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding” (1982) 50(5) Econometrica1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Klemperer, P., “Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature” (1999) 13(3) Journal of Economic Surveys227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] Cramton, P., “Spectrum Auctions,” in Cave, M., Majumdar, S., and Vogelsang, I., eds., Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2002, 605.Google Scholar
[29] Cramton, P., Kwerel, E., Rosston, G., and Skrzypacz, A., “Using Spectrum Auctions to Enhance Competition in Wireless Services” (2011) 54(4) Journal of Law and EconomicsS167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[30] Myerson, R. B., “Perspectives on Mechanism Design in Economic Theory” (2008) 98(3) American Economic Review586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Milgrom, P., “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer” (1989) 3(3) Journal of Economic Perspectives3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] See http://cag.gov.in/html/reports/civil/192010-11_19PA/Telecommunication%20Report.pdf.
[33] See http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc970353.pdf.
[34] Binmore, K. and Klemperer, P., “The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences” (2002) 112(478) Economic JournalC74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Coase, R. H., “The Federal Communications Commission” (1959) 2 Journal of Law and Economics1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[36] Noam, E. M., “Spectrum Auctions: Yesterday's Heresy, Today's Orthodoxy, Tomorrow's Anachronism. Taking the Next Step to Open Spectrum Access” (1998) 41 Journal of Law and Economics765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[37] See http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/aws/data/awsbandplan.pdf.
[38] See http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/maps/reag.pdf.
[39] See http://media.ofcom.org.uk/news/192013/winners-of-the-4g-mobile-auction.
[40] See www.acma.gov.au/Industry/Spectrum/Digital-Dividend-700MHz-and-25Gz-Auction/Reallocation/digital-dividend-auction-results.
[41] See https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-14-50A1.pdf.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×