Acharya, Amitav. “Power Shift or Paradigm Shift? China's Rise and Asia's Emerging Security Order.” International Studies Quarterly 58, 1 (March 2014): 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. “International Practices.” International Theory 3, 1 (2011): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society.” International Organization 68, 1 (January 2014): 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alagappa, Muthiah. “Constructing Security Order in Asia: Conceptions and Issues.” In Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features, edited by Alagappa, Muthiah, 70–105. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Alderson, Kai. “Making Sense of State Socialization.” Review of International Studies 27, 3 (2001): 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aruga, Tadashi. “The Security Treaty Revision of 1960.” In The United States and Japan in the Postwar World, edited by Iriye, Akira and Warren, I. Cohen, 61–79. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1989.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. How To Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Ba, Alice D. (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Baek, Kwang-Il. The United States and Korea: A Study of the ROK-U.S. Security Relationship with the Conceptual Framework of Alliances between Great and Small Powers. Seoul: Research Center for Peace and Unification, 1988.Google Scholar

Baek, Yeong-seo et al. Dong Asia ui jiyeok jilseo [The East Asian Regional Order]. Seoul: Changbi Publishers, 2005.Google Scholar

Ball, Terence. “Conceptual History and the History of Political Thought.” In History of Concepts: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Hampsher-Monk, Iain, Tilmans, Karin, and Van Vree, Frank, 75–86. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L.. “Introduction.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, edited by Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Russell, L. Hanson, 1–5. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Balzacq, Thierry. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11, 2 (2005): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, Ernest. Introduction to Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume, and Rousseau. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960[1947].Google Scholar

Barker, Rodney. Political Legitimacy and the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkin, Samuel J., and Cronin, Bruce. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Organization 48, 1 (Winter 1994): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59, 1 (Winter 2005): 39–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beasley, W. G. Japan Encounters the Barbarian: Japanese Travelers in America and Europe. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Beeson, Mark. “Hegemonic Transition in East Asia? The Dynamics of Chinese and American Power.” Review of International Studies 35, 1 (2009): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beetham, David. The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Duncan S. A. “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27, 3 (2002): 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Thomas U. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Thomas U. War, Guilt, and World Politics after World War II. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betts, Richard K. “Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War.” International Security 18, 3 (Winter 1993/94): 34–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bially Mattern, Janice, and Zarakol, Ayşe. “Review Essay: Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization, 70, 3 (July 2016): 623–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, Casey Nelson. “The Usable Past, the Comfortable Past, and the Civic Past: Memory in Contemporary America.” Cultural Anthropology 14, 3 (August 1999): 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaydes, Lisa, and Drew, A. Linzer. “Elite Competition, Religiosity, and Anti-Americanism in the Islamic World.” American Political Science Review 106, 2 (May 2012): 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleiker, Roland. Divided Korea: Toward a Culture of Reconciliation. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bowden, Brett. The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Imperial Idea. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowden, Brett, and Seabrooke, Leonard. “Civilizing Markets through Global Standards.” In Global Standards of Market Civilization, edited by Bowden, Brett and Seabrooke, Leonard, 3–16. New York: Routledge, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Barbara J. Japan's Imperial Diplomacy: Consuls, Treaty Ports, and War in China 1895–1938. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Brooks, William L. “The Politics of the Futenma Base Issue in Okinawa.” Asia-Pacific Policy Paper Series, No. 9, 2010.Google Scholar

Buckley, Roger. U.S.-Japan Alliance Diplomacy, 1945–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bull, Hedley, and Watson, Adam, eds. The Expansion of International Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Burbank, Jane, and Cooper, Frederick. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Buszynsi, Leszek. “Hatoyama and the US Alliance.” East Asia Forum, November 27, 2009. Available at www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/27/hatoyama-and-the-us-alliance/ (accessed December 17, 2013).Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry. “The International Society Approach and Asia.” In Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, edited by Saadia, M. Pekknaen, Ravenhill, John, and Foot, Rosemary, 100–119. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George “The Global Transformation: The Nineteenth Century and the Making of Modern International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 57, 3 (2013): 620–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George “Rethinking Benchmark Dates in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 20, 2 (2014): 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, Barry, and Wæver, Ole. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni, and Kelemen, R. Daniel. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, 3 (April 2007): 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, Allen. Unifying China, Integrating with the World: Securing Chinese Sovereignty in the Reform Era. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cassel, Pär Kristoffer. Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cha, Ju Ho. “9–11 tereo sageon eul dulleossan Ilbon jisik-in ui baneung [The Responses of Japanese Elites to the 9–11 Terror Attacks].” Gukje jeongchi nonchong (Korean Journal of International Relations) 42, 2 (2002): 151–173.Google Scholar

Cha, Victor D. Alignment despite Antagonism: the United States-Korea-Japan Security Triangle. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cha, Victor D. “Security and Democracy in South Korean Development.” In Korea's Democratization, edited by Samuel, S. Kim, 201–219. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandra, Vipan. Imperialism, Resistance, and Reform in Late Nineteenth-Century Korea: Enlightenment and the Independence Club. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley, 1988.Google Scholar

Chanlett-Avery, Emma, and Rinehart, Ian E.. “The U.S. Military Presence in Okinawa and the Futenma Base Controversy.” CRS Report for Congress R42645, August 3, 2012.Google Scholar

Cheong, Sung-Hwa. The Politics of Anti-Japanese Sentiment in Korea: Japanese-South Korean Relations Under American Occupation, 1945–1952. New York: Greenwood Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Cho, Il Hyun. Global Rogues and Regional Orders: The Multidimensional Challenge of North Korea and Iran. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Cho, Young Nam (Cho, Yeong-nam). Yong-gwa chum-eul chuja [Let's Dance with the Dragon]. Seoul, Mineumsa, 2012.Google Scholar

Choe, Dong-hi. “1880 nyeondae Joseon ui munje wa gumi yeolgang gwa ui oegyo gwan-gye [Issues in Foreign Relations with the Western Powers in 1880s Joseon].” In Han-guk oegyosa [The History of Korea's Foreign Relations], edited by Han-guk jeongchi oegyosa hakhoe [The Korean Diplomatic History Association], 125–144. Seoul: Jimmundang, 1993.Google Scholar

Choi, Sang-Yong. “Trusteeship Debate and the Korean Cold War.” Korea under the American Military Government, edited by Bonnie, B.C. Oh, 13–39. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.Google Scholar

Chong, Dennis, and James, N. Druckman. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, Ray. Ending the LDP Hegemony: Party Cooperation in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J. The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.Google Scholar

Christensen, Thomas J. “China, the U.S.-Japan Alliance and the Security Dilemma in East Asia.” International Security 23, 4 (Spring 1999): 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chun, Chaesung (Jeon, Jae-seong), Dong Asia gukje jeongchi: yeoksa eseo iron euro [Theory of East Asian International Relations]. Seoul: East Asia Institute, 2011.Google Scholar

Chun, Chaesung (Jeon, Jae-seong “South Korea's Foreign Policy and East Asia.” In Korea and East Asia, edited by Frank, Rudiger and Swenson-Wright, John, 155–179. Leiden: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chun, Chaesung (Jeon, Jae-seong “Why Is There No Non-Western International Relations Theory? Reflections on and From Korea.” In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia, edited by Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry, 69–91. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Chun, Hae-jong. Hanjung gwan-gyesa [The History of Korea-China Relations]. Seoul: Ilchogak, 1970.Google Scholar

Chun, Hae-jong “Sino-Korean Tributary Relations in the Ch'ing Period.” In The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John King, 63–89. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Chung, Chai-sik. A Korean Confucian Encounter with the Modern World: Yi Hang-no and the West. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1995.Google Scholar

Chung, Henry. Korea and the United States Through War and Peace. Seoul: Yonsei University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Chung, Jae Ho. Between Ally and Partner: Korea-China Relations and the United States. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Chung, Jae Ho Joongguk-ui Busang-gwa Hanbando-ui Mirae [The Rise of China and the Future of the Korean Peninsula]. Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Chung, Yong-Hwa (Jeong, Yong-hwa). “Jeonhwan-gi jaju oegyo ui gaenyeom gwa jogeon: 19 segi mal Joseon ui dae-Cheong oegyo ui ironjeok gochal [The Concept and Conditions of Autonomous Diplomacy in a Period of Transition: Theoretical Review of Korean Diplomacy to Qing China during the Late 19th Century].” Gukje jeongchi nonchong 43, 2 (2003): 201–220.Google Scholar

Chung, Yong-Hwa (Jeong, Yong-hwa “Geundae Hanguk-ui ju-gwon gaenyeom ui suyong gwa jeok-yong [The Adoption and Application of the Sovereignty Concept in Modern Korea.” Segye jeongchi (World Politics) 25, 1 (Spring/Summer 2004): 43–69.Google Scholar

Chung, Yong-Hwa (Jeong, Yong-hwa Munmyeong ui jeongchi sasang: Yu Giljun gwa geundae Han-guk [The Political Ideology of Civilization: Yu Giljun and Modern Korea]. Seoul: Munhak gwa jiseongsa, 2004.Google Scholar

Chwe, Michael Suk-Young. Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Felix, Ciută. “Security and the Problem of Context: A Hermeneutical Critique of Securitisation Theory.” Review of International Studies 35, 2 (2009): 301–326.Google Scholar

Clark, Donald N. “Faith and Betrayal: Notes on Korea's Experience in the Chinese Tributary System.” Papers on the 3rd International Conference on Korean Culture and Its Characteristics on the Occasion of the 400^th Anniversary of Yi Yulgok's Death, 1984.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian. Hegemony in International Society. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Ian Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Clark, Ian “Towards and English School Theory of Hegemony.” European Journal of International Relations 15, 2 (2009): 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, David et al. “Essentially Contested Concepts: Debate and Applications.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 3 (October 2006): 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Connolly, William ed. Legitimacy and the State. New York: New York University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander. Logics of Hierarchy: The Organization of Empires, States, and Military Occupations. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander Base Politics: Democratic Change and the U.S. Military Overseas. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Craig, Albert M. Chōshū in the Meiji Restoration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Cranmer-Byng, John. “The Chinese View of Their Place in the World: A Historical Perspective.” The China Quarterly 53 (January–March 1973): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crossley, Pamela Kyle. A Translucent Mirror: History and Identity in Qing Imperial Ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Crowley, James B. Japan's Quest for Autonomy: National Security and Foreign Policy, 1930–1938. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Cumings, Bruce. The Origins of the Korean War, volume 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Davidson, Arnold I. The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

The Democratic Party of Japan. “The Democratic Party of Japan's Basic Policies on Security (Provisional Version),” June 1999. Available at www.dpj.or.jp/english/policy/security/html (accessed December 17, 2013).Google Scholar

Deuchler, Martina. Confucian Gentlemen and Barbarian Envoys: The Opening of Korea, 1875–1885. Seattle and London: The University of Washington Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Deuchler, Martina “Neo-Confucianism: The Impulse for Social Action in Early Yi Korea.” The Journal of Korean Studies 2 (1980): 71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deudney, Daniel. “Binding Sovereigns: Authorities, Structures, and Geopolitics in Philadelphian Systems.” In State Sovereignty as Social Construct, edited by Biersteker, Thomas J. and Weber, Cynthia, 190–239. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Cosmo, Nicola. Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. “Rethinking Political Structures: From ‘Ordering Principles’ to ‘Vertical Differentiation’ – and beyond.” International Theory 1 (March 2009): 49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnelly, Jack “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12, 2 (2006): 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dore, R. P. “The Prestige Factor in International Affairs.” International Affairs 51, 2 (April 1975): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dower, John W. Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1999.Google Scholar

Dower, John W. Empire and Aftermath: Yoshida Shigeru and the Japanese Experience, 1878–1954. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Downs, Erica Strecker, and Saunders, Phillip C.. “Legitimacy and the Limits of Nationalism.” International Security 23, 3 (Winter 1998/99): 114–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James N. “Competing Frames in a Political Campaign.” In Winning with Words: The Origins and Impact of Political Framing, edited by Schaffner, Brian F. and Sellers, Patrick J., 101–120. New York and London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Duara, Prasenjit. Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and East Asian Modern. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2003.Google Scholar

Dudden, Alexis. “Japan's Engagement with International Terms.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, edited by Liu, Lydia, 165–191. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, John. “Proto-nationalism in Premodern Korea.” In Perspectives on Korea, edited by Lee, Sang-Oak and Park, Duk-Soo, 198–221. Sydney: Wild Peony Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Dunne, Tim. Inventing International Society: A History of English School. London: Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easley, Leif-Eric, Kotani, Tetsuo, and Mori, Aki. “On the Foreign Policy of the Democratic Party of Japan.” Asia Policy 9 (January 2010): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Carter J. et al. Korea Old and New: A History. Seoul: Ilchokak Publishers, distributed by Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Edström, Bert. Japan's Evolving Foreign Policy Doctrine. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Em, Henry H. The Great Enterprise: Sovereignty and Historiography in Modern Korea. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John K. “A Preliminary Framework.” In The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John King, 1–19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farr, James. “Understanding Conceptual Change Politically.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, edited by Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L., 24–49. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Fehl, Caroline. “Explaining the International Criminal Court: A ‘Practice Test’ for Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches.” European Journal of International Relations 10, 3 (2004): 357–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fierke, K. M., and Nicholson, Michael. “Divided by a Common Language: Formal and Constructivist Approaches to Games.” Global Society 15, 1 (2001): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. “Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity: Why Being a Unipole Isn't All It's Cracked Up to Be.” World Politics 61, 1 (January 2009): 58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franck, Thomas M. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeden, Michael. “Ideology and Political Theory.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 1 (February 2006): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedberg, Aaron L. “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia.” International Security 18, 3 (Winter 1993/94): 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujimura, Michio. “Japan's Changing Views of Asia.” Japan Quarterly 24, 4 (1977): 423–431.Google Scholar

Fukushima, Akiko. Japanese Foreign Policy: the Emerging Logic of Multilateralism. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallie, W. B. Philosophy and the Historical Understanding. New York: Schocken Books Inc., 1964.Google Scholar

Gamson, William A. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Gamson, William A., and Meyer, David S.. “Framing Political Opportunity.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 275–290. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giffard, Sydney. Japan Among the Powers, 1890–1990. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gills, Barry K. Korea versus Korea: A Case of Contested Legitimacy. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Gills, Barry K., and Gills, Dong-Sook S.. “South Korea and Globalization: The Rise to Globalism?” In East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S., 81–104. Lanham: Rowman Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2000.Google Scholar

Gluck, Carol. Japan's Modern Myths: Ideology in the Late Meiji Period. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gluck, Carol, and Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, eds. Words in Motion: Toward a Global Lexicon. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goddard, Stacie E. Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Goh, Evelyn. “Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies.” International Security 32, 3 (Winter 2007/08): 113–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goh, Evelyn “Hierarchy and the Role of the United States in the East Asian Security Order.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 8, 3 (2008): 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goh, Evelyn The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, and Keohane, Robert O., eds. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Belief, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. “The Beginning of History: Remembering and Forgetting as Strategic Issues.” The Washington Quarterly 24, 2 (Spring 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. “China's Entrance into International Society.” In The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 170–184. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew. A Modern History of Japan: From Tokugawa Times to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew Labor and Imperial Democracy in Prewar Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew, ed. Postwar Japan as History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Michael J. “U.S.-Japan Relations after Koizumi: Convergence or Cooling?” The Washington Quarterly 29, 4 (Autumn 2006): 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (2000): 147–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano “Which Puzzle? An Expected Return of Geopolitical Thought in Europe?” In The Return of Geopolitics in Europe? Social Mechanisms and Foreign Policy Identity Crises, edited by Guzzini, Stefano, 9–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ha, Young-Sun (Ha, Yeong-seon). Geundae Han-guk ui sahoe gwahak gaenyeom hyeongseongsa [The History of the Development of Social Science Concepts in Modern Korea]. Seoul: Changbi, 2009.Google Scholar

Ha, Young-Sun (Ha, Yeong-seon “Nuclearization of Small States and World Order: The Case of Korea.” Asian Survey 18, 11 (November 1978): 1134–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ha, Young-Sun (Ha, Yeong-seon “South Korea.” In Arms Production in Developing Countries, edited by Katz, James Everett, 225–233. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Haboush, JaHyun Kim. “The Confucianization of Korean Society.” In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, edited by Rozman, Gilbert, 84–110. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Haboush, JaHyun Kim A Heritage of Kings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Haboush, JaHyun Kim, and Deuchler, Martina. “Introduction.” In Culture and the State in Late Choson Korea, edited by Haboush, JaHyun Kim and Deuchler, Martina, 1–21. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Center, 1999.Google Scholar

Hahm, Pyung Choon. “Korea and the Emerging Asian Power Balance.” Foreign Affairs 50, 2 (January 1972): 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamashita, Takeshi. China, East Asia and the Global Economy: Regional and Historical Perspectives, edited by Grove, Linda and Selden, Mark. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Hamashita, Takeshi “The Intra-Regional System in East Asia in Modern Times.” In Network Power: Japan and Asia, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J. and Shiraishi, Takashi, 113–135. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hamashita, Takeshi “Tribute and Treaties: East Asian Treaty Ports in the Era of Negotiation, 1834–1894.” European Journal of East Asian Studies 1, 1 (2002): 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampsher-Monk, Iain, Tilmans, Karin, and Vree, Frank Van, eds. History of Concepts: Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampton, Jean. “Contract and Consent.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, edited by Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip, and Pogge, Thomas, 478–492. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar

Han, Hong-Koo. “South Korea and the Vietnam War.” In Developmental Dictatorship and the Park Chung-Hee Era: The Shaping of Modernity in the Republic of Korea, edited by Lee, Byeong-cheon, 248–270. Paramus, NJ: Homa & Sekey Books, 2005.Google Scholar

Han, Jung-Sun N. An Imperial Path to Modernity: Yoshino Sakuzō and a New Liberal Order in East Asia, 1905–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Prses, 2012.Google Scholar

Han, Myung-Ki (Han, Myeong-gi). Imjin oeran gwa Hanjung gwangye [A Study on the Relations between Korea and China from the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592 to the Manchu Invasion of Korea in 1636]. Seoul: Yeoksa Bipyeongsa, 1999.Google Scholar

Han, Sung-Joo, ed. Coping with 9–11: Asian Perspectives on Global and Regional Order. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2003.Google Scholar

Han, Sungjoo. The Failure of Democracy in South Korea. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Yong-Sup (Han, Yong-seop). “Dongmaeng sok e seo ui jaju gukbang [Autonomous Defense within Alliance].” In Jaju nya dongmaeng inya: 21segi Hanguk anbo oegyo ui jinro [Self-Reliance or Alliance? Korea's Security and Foreign Policy in the 21st Century], edited by Han, Yong-Sup, 17–65. Seoul: Oruem, 2004.Google Scholar

Hansen, Lene. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Hara, Takemichi. “Korea, China, and Western Barbarians: Diplomacy in Early Nineteenth-Century Korea.” Modern Asian Studies 32, 2 (1998): 389–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harootunian, Harry D. “The Functions of China in Tokugawa Thought.” In The Chinese and the Japanese: Essays in Political and Cultural Interactions, edited by Iriye, Akira, 9–36. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hatoyama, Yukio. “Basic Policies of the Hatoyama Government,” September 16, 2009. Available at //www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/hatoyama/statement/200909/16policies_e.html (accessed October 30, 2013).Google Scholar

Hatoyama, Yukio. “Policy Speech by Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama at the 173rd Session of the Diet,” October 26, 2009. Available at www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/hatoyama/statement/200910/26syosin_e.html (accessed December 18, 2013).Google Scholar

Healy, Brian, and Stein, Arthur. “The Balance of Power in International History: Theory and Reality.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 17, 1 (March 1973): 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heginbotham, Eric, and Samuels, Richard J.. “Japan's Dual Hedge.” Foreign Affairs 81, 5 (September/October 2002): 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemmer, Christopher, and Katzenstein, Peter J.. “Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism.” International Organization 56, 3 (Summer 2002): 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heo, Uk, and Woo, Jung-Yeop. “Changing National Identity and Security Perception in South Korea.” In Korean Security in a Changing East Asia, edited by Roehrig, Terence, Seo, Jungmin, and Heo, Uk, 192–209. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2007.Google Scholar

Hevia, James. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, John M., and Sharman, J. C.. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11, 1 (2005): 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holden, Gerard. “Who Contextualizes the Contextualizers? Disciplinary History and the Discourse about IR Discourse.” Review of International Studies 28, 2 (April 2002): 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hong, Gyu-deok. “Park Chung Hee ui Beteunam chamjeon gyeoljeong gwa Hanmi dongmaeng gwan-gye ui byeonhwa [Park Chung Hee's Decision to Dispatch Troops to Vietnam and the Transformation of the Korea-U.S. Alliance Relations].” In Park Chung Hee sidae yeongu ui jaengjeom gwa gwaje [Issues and Challenges in the Study of the Park Chung Hee Era], edited by Cheong, Seong-Hwa, 295–315. Seoul: Seon-in, 2005.Google Scholar

Hong, Sun-ho. “Gaehang jeon ui daeoe gwan-gye [Joseon's Foreign Relations before Its Opening].” In Han-guk oegyosa [The History of Korea's Foreign Relations], edited by Hakhoe, Han-guk Jeongchi Oegyosa (The Korean Diplomatic History Association), 41–65. Seoul: Jimmundang, 1993.Google Scholar

Hook, Glenn D., and McCormack, Gavan. Japan's Contested Constitution: Documents and Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted. Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howland, Douglas R. Translating the West: Language and Political Reason in Nineteenth-Century Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. China's Entrance into the Family of Nations: The Diplomatic Phase, 1858–1880. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, Thomas M. “Chōshū Activists in the Meiji Restoration.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1975.Google Scholar

Hughes, Christopher W. Japan's Security Agenda: Military, Economic, and Environmental Dimensions. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunsberger, Warren S. “Introduction: Japan's International Rankings and Roles.” In Japan's Quest: The Search for International Role, Recognition, and Respect, edited by Warren, Hunsberger. M. E. Sharpe, 1997, xxv–xxxiii.Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53, 2 (Spring 1999): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hwang, Byung-Moo. “‘Hyeop ryeok jeok jaju gukbang eun otteoke ganeung han ga” [How to Make “Cooperative Autonomous Defense” Possible]. Sin Dong-a, July 2004.Google Scholar

Hwang, In K. The Korean Reform Movement of the 1880s. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, 1978.Google Scholar

Hwang, Weon-gu. “Korean World View through Relations with China.” Korea Journal (October 1973): 10–17.Google Scholar

Iida, Yumiko. Rethinking Identity in Modern Japan: Nationalism as Aesthetics. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

John., Ikenberry. G. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

John., Ikenberry. G. “America in East Asia: Power, Markets, and Grand Strategy.” In Beyond Bilateralism: U.S.-Japan Relations in the New Asia-Pacific, edited by Ellis, S. Krauss and Pempel, T. J., 37–54. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

John., Ikenberry. G. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, and Inoguchi, Takashi. “Introduction.” In Reinventing the Alliance: U.S.-Japan Security Partnership in an Era of Change, edited by Ikenberry, G. John and Inoguchi, Takashi, 1–20. New York: Palgrave, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi. “Japan's Response to the Gulf Crisis: An Analytic Overview.” Journal of Japanese Studies 17, 2 (Summer 1991): 257–273.Google Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi “Japanese Strategic Thought toward Asia in the 1980s.” In Japanese Strategic Thought Toward Asia, edited by Rozman, Gilbert, Togo, Kazuhiko, and Ferguson, Joseph P., 35–56. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi “Korea in Japanese Visions of Regional Order.” In Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia, edited by Charles, K. Armstrong, Rozman, Gilbert, Samuel, S. Kim, and Kotkin, Stephen, 5–14. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2006.Google Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi, and Bacon, Paul. “Japan's Emerging Role as a ‘Global Ordinary Power.’” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 6, 1 (2006): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iriye, Akira. After Imperialism: The Search for a New Order in the Far East 1921–1931. Chicago: Imprint Publications, 1990[1965].Google Scholar

Iriye, Akira. “Japan's Drive to Great-Power Status,” in The Cambridge History of Japan, Volume 5: The Nineteenth Century, edited by Marius, B. Jansen, 721–782. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ish-Shalom, Piki. “Political Constructivism: The Political Construction of Social Knowledge.” In Arguing Global Governance: Agency, Lifeworld and Shared Reasoning, edited by Bjola, Cornelieu and Kornprobst, Markus, 231–246. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Ito, Kenichi. “The Japanese State of Mind: Deliberations on the Gulf Crisis.” Journal of Japanese Studies 17, 2 (Summer 1991): 275–290.Google Scholar

Ito, Kobun. “Japan's Security in the 1970s: A Symposium.” Asian Survey 10, 12 (December 1970): 1031–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ito, Narihiko. “Toward an independent Japanese Relationship with the United States.” Gunshuku (Arms Control), August 2004.Google Scholar

Izumikawa, Yasuhiro. “Explaining Japanese Antimilitarism: Normative and Realist Constraints on Japan's Security Policy.” International Security 35, 2 (2010): 123–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H.. “Contructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?” International Studies Review 6 (2004): 337–341.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jager, Sheila Miyoshi. Narratives of Nation Building in Korea: A Genealogy of Patriotism. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2003.Google Scholar

Jansen, Marius B. China in the Tokugawa World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansen, Marius B. “Meiji Ishin: The Political Context.” In Meiji Ishin: Restoration and Revolution, edited by Nagai, Michio and Urrutia, Miguel, 1–16. Tokyo: The United Nations University, 1985.Google Scholar

Jeon, Sang Sook. “U.S. Korean Policy and the Moderates During the U.S. Military Government Era.” In Korea Under the American Military Government, 1945–1948, edited by Bonnie, B. C. Oh, 79–102. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.Google Scholar

Jeong, Ok-ja. Joseon junghwa sasang yeongu [A Study of the Ideology of Sinocentrism in Joseon Korea]. Seoul: Iljisa, 1998.Google Scholar

Johnson, Chalmers A. “‘Low Posture’ Politics in Japan.” Asian Survey 3, 1 (January 1963): 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Paul M. “The Subordinate States and Their Strategies.” In Dominant Powers and Subordinate States, edited by Triska, Jan F., 285–309. Durham: Duke University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain. “Conclusions and Extensions: Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and Beyond Europe.” International Organization 59, 4 (October 2005): 1013–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain “How New and Assertive is China's New Assertiveness?” International Security 37, 4 (Spring 2013): 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain “Is China A Status Quo Power?” International Security 27, 4 (Spring 2003): 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain “What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (2012): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jung, Walter B. Nation Building: The Geopolitical History of Korea. Lanham: University Press of America, 1998.Google Scholar

Kal, Hong. Aesthetic Constructions of Korean Nationalism: Spectacle, Politics and History. London and New York: Routledge, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, David C. China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kang, David C. East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kang, David C. “Getting Asia Wrong: the Need for New Analytic Frameworks.” International Security 27, 4 (Spring 2003): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, David C. “Hierarchy and Stability in Asian International Relations.” In International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, edited by Ikenberry, G. John and Mastanduno, Michael, 163–190. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kang, Dong-guk. “‘Zokuhō’ no seiji sisōsi: 19 seikigo ni okeru ‘Chousen tii mondai’ wo meguru gensetsu no keifu [The Political History of Zokuhō: The Discourse on the ‘Choson Problem’ in the Late 19th Century].” PhD diss., University of Tokyo, 2004.Google Scholar

Kang, Etsuko Hae-Jin. Diplomacy and Ideology in Japanese-Korean Relations: From the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kang, Jae-eun. The Land of Scholars: Two Thousand Years of Korean Confucianism. Paramus, NJ: Noma & Sekye Books, 2003.Google Scholar

Kang, Jae-eon. Seoyang gwa Joseon: geu yimunhwa gyeoktu ui yeoksa [The West and Joseon Korea: A History of the Clash between Civilizations]. Seoul: Hakgojae, 1994.Google Scholar

Kang, Man-gil. Gocheo sseun Han-guk geundaesa [Rewriting Modern Korean History]. Seoul: Changjak gwa bipyeongsa, 1994.Google Scholar

Kang, Sang-jung, ed. Nichibei kankei kara no jiritsu: ku jūichi kara Iraku, Kita Chōsen kiki made [Towards Autonomy in US-Japan Relations: From 9/11 to Iraq to the North Korea Crisis]. Tokyo: Fujiwara Shoten, 2003.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. “Japanese Security in Perspective.” In Rethinking Japanese Security: Internal and External Dimensions, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 1–31. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. “Same War – Different Views: Germany, Japan and Counter-Terrorism.” International Organization 57, 4 (Fall 2003): 731–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. Sinicization and the Rise of China: Civilizational Processes beyond East and West. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. “A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions, and Practices.” In Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 1–40. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Alison Adcock. “The ‘Century of Humiliation,’ Then and Now: Chinese Perceptions of the International Order.” Pacific Focus 25, 1 (April 2010): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufmann, Chaim. “Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars.” International Security 20, 4 (Spring 2001): 136–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, Edward. “The Standard of ‘Civilization,’ the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-century International Social Space.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42, 3 (2014): 651–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khong, Yuen Foong. “The American Tributary System.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 6 (2013): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khong, Yuen Foong “Foreign Policy Analysis and the International Relations of Asia.” In Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, edited by Pekkanen, Saadia M., Ravenhill, John and Foot, Rosemary, 82–99. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Kim, Dalchoong (Kim, Dal-jung). “1880 nyeon dae Han-guk guknae jeongchi wa oegyo jeongchaek: Min ssi jeongchi jidoryeok mit oegyo jeongchaek jaepyong-ga [Korean Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy in the 1880s: A Reevaluation of the Min Clan's Political Leadership and Foreign Policy].” Han-guk jeongchi hakhoebo (Korean Political Science Journal) 10 (1976): 231–251.Google Scholar

Kim, Gwan-ok. “Han-guk pabyeong oegyo e daehan yangmyeon geim ironjeok bunseok: Beteunam pabyeong gwa Iraku pabyeong sarye bigyo [A Two-Level Game Analysis of Korea's Troops Dispatch Diplomacy: A Comparative Study of the Vietnam and Iraq Cases].” Daehan Jeongchi Hakhoepo 13, 1 (2005): 358–385.Google Scholar

Kim, Gwang-sik. “8·15 jik hu jeongchi jidojadeul ui noseon bigyo [A Comparison of the Political Ideologies of Korean Leaders in the Immediate Aftermath of the 1945 Liberation].” In Haebang jeonhusa ui insik [Views on the History of Korean Politics Before and After Liberation], volume 2, edited by Kang, Man-gil et al., 45–58. Seoul: Hangilsa, 1985.Google Scholar

Kim, Han-kyu. Hanjung gwan-gyesa II [The History of Korea-China Relations, volume 2]. Seoul: Arke, 1999.Google ScholarPubMed

Kim, Heaseung (Kim, Hye-seung). Han-guk minjokjuui: balsaeng yangsik gwa jeon-gae gwajeong [A Study on the Origins and Development of Korean Nationalism]. Seoul: Bibong, 1997.Google Scholar

Kim, Ho-ki (Kim, Ho-gi). “Ije Miguk eun eopda? Sungmi eseo banmi kkaji, Han-guk-in ui bokjaphan simri bunseok [Is the United States No More Now? From Adulation to Anti-Americanism, An Analysis of the Complex Sentiments Held by Koreans].” Shin Dong-a, January 2003.Google Scholar

Kim, Hyung-A. Korea's Development under Park Chung Hee: Rapid Industrialization, 1961–79. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Hyung I. Fundamental Legal Concepts of China and the West: A Comparative Study. Port Washington, NY: National University Publications, 1981.Google Scholar

Kim, Hyung-Kook. The Division of Korea and the Alliance Making Process: Internationalization of Internal Conflict and Internalization of International Struggle, 1945–1948. Lanham: University Press of America, 1995.Google Scholar

Kim, Il-yeong, and Cho, Seong-ryeol. Juhan Migun: yeoksa, jaengjeom, jeonmang [U.S. Forces in Korea: History, Issues, Prospects]. Seoul: Hanwool Academy, 2003.Google Scholar

Kim, Jae-hong. “Iraku chuga pabyeong ui je munje: gukje anbo wa guknae jeongchijeok gwanjeom [Issues Surrounding the Additional Dispatch of Troops to Iraq: From the Perspective of International Security and Domestic Politics].” In Iraku pabyeong gwa hanmi dongmaeng [Iraq Troops Dispatch and the Korea-U.S. Alliance]. Institute for Far Eastern Studies Report 2003–3 (October 2003).Google Scholar

Kim, Jiyul. “Pan-Korean Nationalism, Anti-Great Power-ism and U.S.-South Korean Relations.” Japan Focus, December 13, 2005, http://japanfocus.org/products/details/1679 (accessed February 20, 2007).Google Scholar

Kim, Key-Hiuk. The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order: Korea, Japan, and the Chinese Empire, 1860–1882. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kim, Samuel S. “East Asia and Globalization: Challenges and Responses.” In East Asia and Globalization, edited by Kim, Samuel S., 1–29. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2000.Google Scholar

Kim, Samuel S. The Two Koreas and the Great Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Seung-Yong. “Security, Nationalism and the Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons and Missiles: The South Korean Case, 1970–82.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 12, 4 (December 2001): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Sunhyuk. “Civic Engagement and Democracy in South Korea.” Korea Observer 40, 1 (Spring 2009): 1–26.Google Scholar

Kim, Yeong-jak. Hanmal naesheoneollijeum yeongu [The Study of Nationalism in Late Joseon Korea]. Seoul: Cheong-gye Yeon-guso, 1989.Google Scholar

Kim, Yongkoo (Kim, Yong-gu). The Five Years’ Crisis, 1866–1871: Korea in the Maelstrom of Western Imperialism. Seoul: Circle, 2001.Google Scholar

Kim, Yongkoo (Kim, Yong-gu Segye-gwan chungdol gwa Hanmal oegyosa, 1866–1882 [The Clash of World Views and Korean Diplomatic History in the Late Joseon Period, 1866–1882]. Seoul: Munhak gwa jiseongsa, 2001.Google Scholar

Kimura, Kan. Chōsen/Kankoku nashonarizumu to ‘shōkoku’ ishiki: chōkōkoku kara kokuminkokka e [Choson/Korean Nationalism and “Small State” Identity: From Tributary State to Nation-State]. Kyoto: Minerva Shobō, 2000.Google Scholar

Kitaoka, Shinichi, Nihon no jirutsu: taibei kyōchō to Ajia gaikō; [Japan's Independence: Cooperation with the United States and Foreign Policy toward Asia]. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 2004.Google Scholar

Kliman, Daniel M. Japan's Security Strategy in the Post-9/11 World: Embracing a New Realpolitik. Westport: Praeger, 2006.Google Scholar

Koh, Byong-ik. “Confucian Ideology and Political Equilibrium in East Asia.” Social Science Journal 4 (1976–77): 7–15.Google Scholar

Kohno, Masaru. “The Domestic Foundations of Japan's International Contribution.” In Japan in International Politics: The Foreign Policies of an Adaptive State, edited by Thomas, U. Berger, Mike, M. Mochizuki, and Tsuchiyama, Jitsuo, 23–46. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohno, Masaru. “On the Meiji Restoration: Japan's Search for Sovereignty?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1, 2 (August 2001): 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koizumi, Junichiro. “Prime Minister Koizumi's Report on Japan's Measures in Response to the Situation following the Use of Force against Iraq.” Plenary Session of the House of Representatives, Plenary Session of the House of Councilors, March 20, 2003. Available at http://japan.kantei.go.jp/koizumispeech/2003/03/20houkoku_e.html.Google Scholar

Kojima, Tomoyuki. “Hendōki higashi Ajia no tokujitsu [Characteristics of East Asia in Transformation].” In Higashi Ajia no anzen hoshō; [East Asian Security], edited by Kojima, Tomoyuki and Takeda, Isami, 23–45. Tokyo: Nansosha, 2002.Google Scholar

Kokubun, Ryosei. “Changing Japanese Strategic Thinking toward China.” In Japanese Strategic Thought toward Asia, edited by Rozman, Gilbert, Togo, Kazuhiko, and Ferguson, Joseph P., 137–158. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kokubun, Ryosei, and Wang, Jisi, eds. The Rise of China and a Changing East Asian Order. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Translated by Todd Samuel Presner et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. “Organized Hypocrisy in Nineteenth-Century East Asia.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1, 2 (August 2001): 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauss, Ellis S. Japanese Radicals Revisited: Student Protest in Postwar Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krauss, Ellis S., and Pempel, T. J., eds., Beyond Bilateralism: U.S.-Japan Relations in the New Asia-Pacific. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Krebs, Ronald R. Fighting for Rights: Military Service and the Politics of Citizenship. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Ku, Dai Yeol (Gu, Dae-yeol). “Dongseoyang gukje jilseo-gwan ui chungdol gwa saeroun jilseo-gwan ui hyeongseong [Clash of Eastern and Western Views of the International Order and the Formation of a New Worldview].” Gukje jeongchi nonchong 28, 1 (1988): 3–21.Google Scholar

Kurtz, Joachim. The Discovery of Chinese Logic. Leiden: Brill, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurtz, Joachim “Translating the Vocation of Man: Liang Qichao (1873–1929), J.G. Fichte, and the Body Politic in Early Republican China.” In Why Concepts Matter: Translating Social and Political Thought, edited by Martin, J. Burke and Richter, Melvin, 153–175. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwan, Alan Shiu Cheung. “Hierarchy, Status and International Society: China and the Steppe Nomads.” European Journal of International Relations (2015): 1–22.Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. “The Social Contract Tradition.” In A Companion to Ethics, edited by Singer, Peter, 186–196. Oxford: Blackwell Reference, 1991.Google Scholar

Lackner, Michael, Amelung, Iwo, and Kurtz, Joachim, eds. New Terms for New Ideas: Western Knowledge and Lexical Change in Late Imperial China. Leiden: Brill, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laffey, Mark, and Weldes, Jutta. “Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 3, 2 (1997): 193–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laitin, David D. Language Repertoires and State Construction in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David A. “Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics.” International Security 32, 1 (Summer 2007): 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David A. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. “Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of U.S. International Hierarchy.” International Security 38, 2 (Fall 2013): 74–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lake, David A., and Donald, S. Rothchild. “Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict.” International Security 21, 2 (Fall 1996): 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanoszka, Alexander. “Protection States Trust? Major Power Patronage, Nuclear Behavior, and Alliance Dynamics.” PhD diss., Princeton University, 2014.Google Scholar

Larsen, Kirk Wayne. Tradition, Treaties, and Trade: Qing Imperialism and Choson Korea, 1850–1910. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Larson, Deborah Welch, and Shevchenko, Alexei. “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy.” International Security 34, 4 (Spring 2010): 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Eric V., et al. Ambivalent Allies? A Study of South Korean Attitudes toward the U.S. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2004.Google Scholar

Lawson, George. “The Eternal Divide? History and International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 18, 2 (2010): 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledyard, Gari. “Confucianism and War: The Korean Security Crisis of 1598.” Journal of Korean Studies 6 (1988–1989): 81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ledyard, Gari “Han-guk-in ui sadaejueui [Koreans and the sadae ideology].” Sin Dong-a, October 1968.Google Scholar

Lee, Chae-Jin, and Sato, Hideo. U.S. Policy Toward Japan and Korea. New York: Praeger, 1982.Google Scholar

Lee, Chong-sik. The Politics of Korean Nationalism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Hong Yung, Ha, Yong-Chool, and Sorensen, Clark W., eds. Colonial Rule and Social Change in Korea, 1910–1945. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Lee, Jung-Hoon. “The Emergence of ‘New Elites’ in South Korea and Its Implications for Popular Sentiment Toward the United States.” In Strategy and Sentiment: South Korean Views of the United States and the U.S.-ROK Alliance, edited by Mitchell, Derek J., 59–66. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2004.Google Scholar

Lee, Sang-Dawn. Big Brother, Little Brother: The American Influence on Korean Culture in the Lyndon B. Johnson Years. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Lee, Seong-hun. “Iraku chuga pabyeong jeongchaek gyeoljeong: yangmyeon geim-jeok sigak e seo [The Decision-making Process on the Additional Troops Dispatch to Iraq: A Two-level Game Perspective].” Gunsa nondan (Defense Forum), no. 39 (Autumn 2004): 61–72.Google Scholar

Lee, Sook-Jong. “Allying with the United States: Changing South Korean Attitudes.” The Korea Journal of Defense Analysis 17, 1 (Spring 2005): 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Yong Wook, and Son, Key-young, eds. China's Rise and Regional Integration in East Asia: Hegemony or Community? New York: Routledge, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Legro, Jeffrey W. Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Leheny, David. The Rules of Play: National Identity and the Shaping of Japanese Leisure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hartmut, and Richter, Melvin, eds. The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Washington, D.C.: German Historical Institute, 1996.Google Scholar

Lessnoff, Michael. Social Contract. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, David. “Framing Peace Policies: The Competition for Resonant Themes.” Political Communication 22, 1 (2005): 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lind, Jennifer. Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lipschutz, Ronnie D. “On Security.” In On Security, edited by Ronnie, D. Lipschutz, 1–23. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Liu, Lydia H. The Clash of Empires: The Invention of China in Modern World Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Lydia H. “Legislating the Universal: The Circulation of International Law in the Nineteenth Century.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, edited by Liu, Lydia, 127–164. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Lydia H. ed. Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Lydia H. Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity – China, 1900–1937. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Marc. “Lie to Me: Sanctions on Iraq, Moral Argument and the International Politics of Hypocrisy.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Price, Richard, 165–196. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Paul K. Networks of Domination: The Social Foundations of Peripheral Conquest in International Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, James. The Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Mancall, Mark. “The Ch'ing Tribute System: An Interpretive Essay.” In The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John, 63–89. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Maruyama, Masao. Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan. Translated by Mikiso Hane. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Masini, Federico. The Formation of Modern Chinese Lexicon and Its Evolution Toward a National Language: The Period from 1840 to 1898. Berkeley: Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1993.Google Scholar

Mastanduno, Michael. “Incomplete Hegemony: The United States and the Security Order in Asia.” In Asian Security Order, edited by Alagappa, Muthiah, 141–166. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

McCormack, Gavan. “Ampo's Troubled 50th: Hatoyama's Abortive Rebellion, Okinawa's Mounting Resistance and the US-Japan Relationship (Part 1).” The Asia-Pacific Journal, 22–3–10, May 31, 2010.Google Scholar

McCormack, Gavan “Ampo's Troubled 50th: Hatoyama's Abortive Rebellion, Okinawa's Mounting Resistance and the US-Japan Relationship (Part 2).” The Asia-Pacific Journal, 22–4–10, May 31, 2010.Google Scholar

McCormack, Gavan Client State: Japan in the American Embrace. London and New York: Verso, 2007.Google Scholar

McCune, George M. “The Exchange of Envoys between Korea and Japan during the Tokugawa Period.” The Far Eastern Quarterly 5, 3 (May 1946): 308–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonald, Matt. “Securitization and the Construction of Security.” European Journal of International Relations 14, 4 (2008): 563–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michishita, Narushige. “Japan's Response to 9–11.” In Coping with 9–11: Asian Perspectives on Global and Regional Order, edited by Han, Sung-Joo, 40–55. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2003.Google Scholar

Midford, Paul. “Japan's Response to Terror: Dispatching the SDF to the Arabian Sea.” Asian Survey 43, 2 (2003): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Midford, Paul Rethinking Japanese Public Opinion and Security: From Pacifism to Realism? Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Mills, Charles W. The Racial Contract. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Min, Byeong-cheon. Han-guk anboron [Theories of Korean Security]. Seoul: Taegwang munhwasa, 1985.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Diplomatic Bluebook for 1971. Tokyo: Public Information Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, July 1972.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Diplomatic Bluebook for 1973. Tokyo: Public Information Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, December 1974.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Diplomatic Bluebook for 1975. Tokyo: Public Information Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, December 1976.Google Scholar

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Diplomatic Bluebook for 1977. Tokyo: Public Information Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, December 1978.Google Scholar

Mitani, Hiroshi. Escape from Impasse: The Decision to Open Japan. Translated by David Noble. Tokyo: International House of Japan, 2006.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Derek. “Does Popular Sentiment Matter? What's at Stake?” In Strategy and Sentiment: South Korean Views of the United States and the U.S.-ROK Alliance, edited by Mitchell, Derek J., 5–10. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2004.Google Scholar

Mitzen, Jennifer. Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mizukoshi, Hideaki. “Terrorists, Terrorism, and Japan's Counter-terrorism Policy.” Gaiko Forum (Summer 2003): 53–62.Google Scholar

Mochizuki, Mike M. “Japan's Changing International Role.” In Japan in International Politics: The Foreign Policies of an Adaptive State, edited by Berger, Thomas U., Mochizuki, Mike M., and Tsuchiyama, Jitsuo, 1–22. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar

Monteiro, Nuno P. Theory of Unipolar Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moon, Katharine H. S. “Korean Nationalism, Anti-Americanism and Democratic Consolidation.” In Korea's Democratization, edited by Kim, Samuel S., 135–158. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moon, Katharine H.S. Protesting America: Democracy and the U.S.-Korea Alliance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Morris-Suzuki, Tessa. “The Frontiers of Japanese Identity.” In Asian Forms of the Nation, edited by Tønnesson, Stein and Antlöv, Hans, 41–66. Richmond: Curzon, 1996.Google Scholar

Morrison, Charles E., and Suhrke, Astri. Strategies of Survival: The Foreign Policy Dilemma of Smaller Asian States. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Mörth, Ulrika. “Competing Frames in the European Commission – the Case of the Defence Industry and Equipment Issue.” Journal of European Public Policy 7, 2 (June 2000): 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel H.. “Singularity or Aberration? A Response to Buzan and Lawson.” International Studies Quarterly 57, 3 (2013): 637–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nahm, Andrew C. “American-Korean Relations.” In The United States and Korea: American-Korean Relations, 1866–1976, edited by Nahm, Andrew C.. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, 1979.Google Scholar

Nahm, Andrew C. Korea: Tradition and Transformation. Elizabeth, NJ: Hollym International Corp., 1988.Google Scholar

Najita, Tetsuo. “Conceptual Consciousness in the Meiji Ishin.” In Meiji Ishin: Restoration and Revolution, edited by Nagai, Michio and Urrutia, Miguel, 83–99. Tokyo: The United Nations University, 1985.Google Scholar

Nakamura, Masanori. “Democratization, Peace, and Economic Development in Occupied Japan, 1945–1952.” In The Politics of Democratization: Generalizing East Asian Experiences, edited by Friedman, Edward, 61–80. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Nam, Joo-Hong. America's Commitment to South Korea: The First Decade of the Nixon Doctrine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narsimhan, Sushila. Japanese Perceptions of China in the Nineteenth Century. New Delhi: Phoenix Publishing House Pvt Ltd, 1999.Google Scholar

Nelson, Frederick M. Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1946.Google Scholar

Ng-Quinn, Michael. “The Internationalization of the Region: The Case of Northeast Asian International Relations.” Review of International Studies 12, 1 (January 1986): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nish, Ian. Japan's Struggle with Internationalism: Japan, China and the League of Nations, 1931–3. London and New York: Kegan Paul International, 1993.Google Scholar

Oberdorfer, Don. The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1997.Google Scholar

Odgaard, Liselotte. The Balance of Power in Asia-Pacific Security: U.S.-China Policies on Regional Order. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogata, Sadako. “Japanese Attitudes toward China.” Asian Survey 5, 8 (August 1965): 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oh, Bonnie B. C. “Kim Kyu-sik and the Coalition Effort.” In Korea Under the American Military Government, 1945–1948, edited by Bonnie, B. C. Oh, 103–122. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.Google Scholar

Oh, Bonnie B.C. “Sino-Japanese Rivalry in Korea, 1876–1885.” In The Chinese and the Japanese: Essays in Political and Cultural Interactions, edited by Iriye, Akira, 37–52. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oh, Jennifer S. “Strong State and Strong Civil Society in Contemporary South Korea: Challenges to Democratic Governance.” Asian Survey 52, 3 (May/June 2012): 528–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oh, John Kie-chang. Korean Politics: The Quest for Democratization and Economic Development. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okamoto, Yukio. “Toward Reconstruction Aid for Iraq: A Path via the Indian Ocean and the Nile.” Gaiko Forum 3, 2 (Summer 2003): 3–15.Google Scholar

Oksenberg, Michel. “The Issue of Sovereignty in the Asian Historical Context.” InProblematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, edited by Stephen, D. Krasner, 83–104. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olick, Jeffrey K. “From Usable Pasts to the Return of the Repressed.” The Hedgehog Review 9, 2 (Summer 2007): 19–31.Google Scholar

Olsen, Niklas. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, Barry. Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas, and Klink, Frank F.. “Anarchy, Authority, Rule.” International Studies Quarterly 33, 2 (June 1989): 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oros, Andrew L. 2008. Normalizing Japan: Politics, Identity, and the Evolution of Security Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Osiander, Andreas. “Sovereignty, International Relations and the Westphalian Myth.” International Organization 55, 2 (2001): 251– 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Packard, George R., III. Protest in Tokyo: The Security Treaty Crisis of 1960. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palonen, Kari. “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself: From Method to Theory in Reinhart Koselleck's Begriffsgeschifte.” Redescriptions 1 (1997): 39–69.Google Scholar

Palonen, Kari Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity, 2003.Google Scholar

Palonen, Kari “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change.” Redescriptions 3 (1999): 41–58.Google Scholar

Park, Choong-Seok (Pak, Chung-seok). “Concept of International Order in the History of Korea.” Korea Journal 18, 7(July 1978): 15–21.Google Scholar

Park, Choong-Seok (Pak, Chung-seok Han-guk jeongchi sasangsa [The History of Korean Political Thought]. Seoul: Sanyoungsa, 1982.Google Scholar

Park, Choong-Seok (Pak, Chung-seok “Han-guk-sa ui isseoseo ui gukje jilseo gwan-nyeom e daehan sochal [A Study of Conceptions of World Order in Korean History].” Gukje jeongchi nonchong (Review of International Political Studies) 17 (1977): 215–227.Google Scholar

Park, Choong-Seok (Pak, Chung-seok “Hanil yang guk ui gukje jilseo-gwan e daehan bigyo yeongu – teukhi 19 segi jungyeop ui byeon-yong eul jungsim euro” [A Comparative Study of the Korean and Japanese Worldviews – with Special Reference to the Transformation of the Hwa-i Ideology in the Mid-19th Century]. Asea Yeon-gu (The Journal of Asiatic Studies) 23, 2 (July 1980): 1–23.Google Scholar

Park, Chung Hee. Major Speeches by President Park Chung Hee (The Country, The Revolution, and I). Seoul: Hollym Corporation Publishers, 1970[1963].Google Scholar

Park, Chung Hee Major Speeches by President Park Chung Hee. Seoul: Hollym Corporation Publishers, 1970.Google Scholar

Park, Chung Hee Our Nation's Path: Ideology of Social Reconstruction. Seoul: Dong-a Publishing Co., 1962.Google Scholar

Park, Seo-Hyun. “Changing Definitions of Sovereignty in Nineteenth-Century East Asia.” Journal of East Asian Studies 13 (2013): 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parsons, Craig. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pateman, Carole, and Mills, Charles W.. “Contract and Social Change.” In Contract and Domination, edited by Pateman, Carole and Mills, Charles W., 10–34. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C. eds. Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pempel, T. J. Policy and Politics in Japan: Creative Conservatism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Perdue, Peter C. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perdue, Peter C. “Where Do Incorrect Political Ideas Come From? Writing the History of the Qing Empire and the Chinese Nation.” In The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State: Japan and China, edited by Fogel, Joshua A., 174–200. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Peyrefitte, Alain. The Collision of Two Civilizations: The British Expedition to China in 1792–4. Translated by Rothschild, Jon. London: Harvill, 1993.Google Scholar

Phillips, Andrew. War, Religion and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Pittau, Joseph. Political Thought in Early Meiji Japan, 1868–1889. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. New York: Atheneum, 1971.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. Virtue, Commerce and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Polletta, Francesca, and Ho, M. Kai. “Frames and Their Consequences.” In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Goodin, Robert E. and Tilly, Charles, 187–197. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization 62, 2 (Spring 2008): 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Presidential Secretariat. Park Chung Hee Daetongnyeong yeonseol munjip [President Park Chung Hee's Speeches]. vol. 8 (1971).Google Scholar

Pressman, Jeremy. Warring Friends: Alliance Restraint in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Purrington, Courtney. “Tokyo's Policy Responses During the Gulf War and the Impact of the ‘Iraqi Shock’ on Japan.” Pacific Affairs 65, 2 (Summer 1992): 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pyle, Kenneth B. Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. New York: PublicAffairs, 2007.Google Scholar

Pyle, Kenneth B. “Meiji Conservatism.” In The Cambridge History of Japan, volume 5: The Nineteenth Century, edited by Jansen, Marius B., 674–720. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinones, C. Kenneth. “South Korea's Approaches to North Korea: A Glacial Process.” InKorean Security Dynamics in Transition, edited by Park, Kyung-Ae and Kim, Dalchoong, 19–48. New York: Palgrave, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reischauer, Edwin O. “The Broken Dialogue with Japan.” Foreign Affairs 39, 1 (October 1960): 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Republic of Korea National Defense Committee. Gukgun budae ui Iraku pa-gyeon yeonjang mit gamchuk gyehwek dong-ui-an saimsa bogoseo [Report on the review of the Iraq troops dispatch extension and reduction bill], December 2006, http://search.assembly.go.kr/bill/doc_20/17/pdf/175543_200.HWP.PDF (accessed February 21, 2007).Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. “International Crises of Legitimacy.” International Politics 44, 2/3 (March/May 2007): 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian “Reading History through Constructivist Eyes.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37, 2 (2008): 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Melvin. “Conceptual History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory.” Political Theory 14, 4 (November 1986): 604–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Melvin “A German Version of the ‘Linguistic Turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the History of Political and Social Concepts (Begriffsgeschichte).” In The History of Political Thought in National Context, edited by Castiglione, Dario and Iain, Hampsher-Monk, 58–79. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Melvin The History of Political and Social Concepts: A Critical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richter, Melvin “Introduction: Translation, the History of Concepts, and the History of Political Thought.” In Why Concepts Matter: Translating Social and Political Thought, edited by Burke, Martin J. and Richter, Melvin. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Ringmar, Erik. “Performing International Systems: Two East-Asian Alternatives to the Westphalian Order.” International Organization 66, 1 (Winter 2012): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Michael Edson. Cultural Nationalism in Colonial Korea, 1920–1925. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2014[1988].Google Scholar

Robinson, Michael Edson “Perceptions of Confucianism in Twentieth-Century Korea.” In The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation, edited by Rozman, Gilbert, 204–225. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rogers, Michael C. “National Consciousness in Medieval Korea: The Impact of Liao and Chin on Koryo.” In China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries, edited by Rossabi, Morris, 151–172. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roh, Gye-hyeon. Goryeo oegyosa [The History of Goryeo Korea's Diplomacy]. Seoul: Kap-in, 1994.Google Scholar

Rose, Caroline. Interpreting History in Sino-Japanese Relations: A Case Study in Political Decision-Making. London and New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Ross, Robert S. “Balance of Power Politics and the Rise of China: Accommodation and Balancing in East Asia.” Security Studies 15, 3 (July–September 2006): 355–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rossabi, Morris. “Introduction.” In China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries, edited by Rossabi, Morris, 1–16. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozman, Gilbert, ed. The East Asian Region: Confucian Heritage and Its Modern Adaptation. Princeton: Princeton Universitiy Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rozman, Gilbert Northeast Asia's Stunted Regionalism: Bilateral Distrust in the Shadow of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, Charlotte, and Gamson, William A.. “The Art of Reframing Political Debates.” Contexts 5, 1 (Winter 2006): 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sabel, Charles F. Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akihiro, Sadō. “Atarashii hōi seisaku ni motomerareru mono [Demands for a New Security Policy].” Gaiko Forum 1 (November 2001): 44–49.Google Scholar

Akihiro, Sadō Sengo Nihon no Bōei to Seiji [Postwar Japan's Defense and Politics]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2003.Google Scholar

Samuels, Richard J. Machiavelli's Children: Leaders and Their Legacies in Italy and Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Samuels, Richard J. Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Scalapino, Robert A., and Masumi, Junnosuke. Parties and Politics in Contemporary Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Schaar, John H. Legitimacy in the Modern State. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1981.Google Scholar

Schaller, Michael. Altered States: the United States and Japan since the Occupation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, Andre. “Decentering the ‘Middle Kingdom’: The Problem of China in Korean Nationalist Thought, 1895–1910.” In Nation Work: Asian Elites and National Identities, edited by Brook, Timothy and Schmid, Andre, 83–108. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Schmid, Andre Korea Between Empires, 1895–1919. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Schmid, Andre “Tributary Relations and the Qing-Chosŏn Frontier on Mount Paektu.” In The Chinese State at the Borders, edited by Lary, Diana, 126–149. Vancouver and Toronto: UBC Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schoenhals, Michael. Doing Things with Words in Chinese Politics: Five Studies. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 1992.Google Scholar

Schoppa, Leonard J. “Two-Level Games and Bargaining Outcomes: Why Gaiatsu Succeeds in Japan in Some Cases but Not Others.” International Organization 47, 3 (Summer 1993): 353–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Paul W. “Historical Reality vs. Neorealist Theory.” International Security 19, 1 (Summer 1994): 108–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schweller, Randall. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Schweller, Randall, and Pu, Xiaoyu. “After Unipolarity: China's Vision of International Order in an Era of U.S. Decline.” International Security 36, 1 (Summer 2011): 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, David. Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Sharman, J. C. “International Hierarchies and Contemporary Imperial Governance: A Tale of Three Kingdoms.” European Journal of International Relations 19, 2 (2011): 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shimazu, Naoko. Japan, Race and Equality: Racial Equality Proposal of 1919. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Shimazu, Naoko Japanese Society at War: Death, Memory and the Russo-Japanese War. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Shin, Gi-Wook. Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics, and Legacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shin, Gi-Wook Peasant Protest and Social Change in Colonial Korea. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Shin, Gi-Wook “South Korean Anti-Americanism.” Asian Survey 36, 8 (1996): 787–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shin, Gi-Wook, and Chang, Paul Y.. “The Politics of Nationalism in U.S.-Korean Relations.” Asian Perspective 28, 4 (2004): 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shin, Gi-Wook, and Robinson, Michael, eds. Colonial Modernity in Korea. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Shin, Yong-ha. Modern Korean History and Nationalism. Seoul: Jimoondang Publishing Company, 2000.Google Scholar

Shiota, Ushio. Kishi Nobusuke. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 1996.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Volume One: The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, 1 (1969): 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, Quentin “A Reply to My Critics.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James. London: Polity, 1988.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin “Some Problems in the Analysis of Thought and Action.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by Tully, James. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.Google Scholar

Smith, Anthony D. “The Origins of Nations.” In Becoming National: A Reader, edited by Eley, Geoff and Suny, Ronald, 106–130. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Smith, Sheila A. Intimate Rivals: Japanese Domestic Politics and a Rising China. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Sneider, Daniel. “The New Asianism: Japanese Foreign Policy under the Democratic Party of Japan.” Asia Policy 12 (July 2011).Google Scholar

Snyder, Glenn H. Alliance Politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Soeya, Yoshihide. “DPJ's Foreign Policy Raises Hopes…and Worries.” East Asia Forum, November 18, 2009. Available at www.eastasiaforum.org/2009/11/18/dpjs-foreign-policy-raises-hopes-and-worries/ (accessed December 17, 2013).Google Scholar

Soeya, Yoshihide “Japan: Normative Constraints versus Structural Imperatives.” In Asian Security Practice: Material and Ideational Influences, edited by Alagappa, Muthiah, 198–232. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soeya, Yoshihide Nihon no “midoru pawaa” gaikō; [Japan's “Middle Power” Diplomacy]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho, 2005.Google Scholar

Solingen, Etel. Regional Orders at Century's Dawn: Global and Domestic Influences on Grand Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Son, Seung-Cheul (Son, Seung-cheol). Joseon sidae hanil gwan-gyesa yeongu [A Study of Korea-Japan Relations during the Joseon Period]. Seoul: Jiseong ui saem, 1994.Google Scholar

Stegewerns, Dick ed. Nationalism and Internationalism in Imperial Japan: Autonomy, Asian Brotherhood, or World Citizenship? London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.Google Scholar

Steinberg, David I., and Shin, Myung. “Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in Transition.” Asian Survey 46, 4 (2006): 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinberg, Marc W. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners.” American Journal of Sociology 105, 3 (November 1999): 736–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, John Peter. The Japanese Interpretation of the ‘Law of Nations,’ 1854–1874. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Stirk, Peter M. R. “The Westphalian Model and Sovereign Equality.” Review of International Studies 38 (2012): 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stockwin, J. A. A. The Japanese Socialist Party and Neutralism. London and New York: Melbourne University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Strauss, Julia C. “The Past in the Present: Historical and Rhetorical Lineages in China's Relations with Africa.” The China Quarterly 199 (September 2009): 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strauss, Julia C., and Saavedra, Martha. “Introduction: China, Africa and Internationalization.” The China Quarterly 199 (September 2009): 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suchman, Mark C. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, Hidemi. “Japan's Entry into International Society.” In The Expansion of International Society, edited by Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, 185–199. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Suganami, Hidemi “Understanding Sovereignty through Kelsen/Schmitt.” Review of International Studies 33, 3 (July 2007): 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugita, Yoneyuki. Pitfall or Panacea: The Irony of US Power in Occupied Japan, 1945–1952. New York and London: Routledge, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Suh, Jae-Jung. Power, Interest, and Identity in Military Alliances. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, Shogo. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan's Encounter with European International Society. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suzuki, Shogo, Zhang, Yongjin, and Quirk, Joel, eds. International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Svensson, Marina. Debating Human Rights in China: A Conceptual and Political History. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2002.Google Scholar

Swartout, Robert R. Jr. Mandarins, Gunboats, and Power Politics: Owen Nickerson Denny and the International Rivalries in Korea. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swenson-Wright, John. Unequal Alliance? United States Security and Alliance Policy Toward Japan, 1945–1960. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takahara, Akio. “A Japanese Perspective on China's Rise and the East Asian Order.” In China's Ascent: Power, Security, and the Future of International Politics, edited by Ross, Robert S. and Feng, Zhu. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Akihiko. Waadō politikusu: gurōbarizeisyon no naka no nihon gaikō; [Word Politics: Japanese Foreign Policy in the Era of Globalization]. Tokyo: Chikuma shohō, 2000.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Stefan. Japan's Orient: Rendering Pasts into History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Tannenwald, Nina. “Ideas and Explanation: Advancing the Theoretical Agenda.” Journal of Cold War Studies 7, 2 (Spring 2005): 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar