Abercrombie, R. E. and Rice, J. R. (2005). Can observations of earthquake scaling constrain slip weakening?Geophys. J. Int., 162, 406–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adda Bedia, M. and Madariaga, R. (2008). Seismic radiation from a kink on an antiplane fault. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 98, 2291–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aki, K. (1966). Generation and propagation of G waves from the Niigata earthquake of June 16, 1964. Estimation of earthquake movement, released energy and stress–strain drop from G wave spectrum. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., 44, 23–88.Google Scholar

Aki, K. (1967). Scaling law of seismic spectrum. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 5359–5376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aki, K. (1979). Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 6140–6148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aki, K. (1984). Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5867–5872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aki, K. and Richards, P. G. (1980). Quantitative Seismology. Theory and Methods. Two volumes. San Francisco: W. H. FreemanGoogle Scholar

Ampuero, J. P. and Rubin, A. M. (2008). Earthquake nucleation on rate and state faults – aging and slip laws. J. Geophys. Res., 113, B01302, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, D. J. (1976). Rupture velocity of plain stress shear cracks. J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5679–5687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, D. J. (1989). Mechanics of fault junctions. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9389–9397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, D. J. (1999). Test of two methods for faulting in finite-difference calculations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 89, 931–937.Google Scholar

Aochi, H. and Madariaga, R. (2003). The 1999 Izmit, Turkey, earthquake: non-planar fault structure, dynamic rupture process, and strong ground motion. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 1249–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aochi, H., Fukuyama, E., and Matsu'ura, M. (2000). Spontaneous rupture propagation on a non-planar fault in 3-D elastic medium. Pure Appl. Geophys. 157, 2003–2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archuleta, R. J. (1984). A faulting model for the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 4559–4585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arias, R., Madariaga, R. and Adda-Bedia, M. (2011). Singular elasto-static field near a fault kink. Pageoph., 168, 2167–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avallone, A., Marzario, M., Cirella, A., Piatanesi, A., Rovelli, A., Di Alessandro, C. et al. (2011). Very high rate (10 Hz) GPS seismology for moderate-magnitude earthquakes: the case of the MW 6.3 L'Aquila (Central Italy) event. J. Geophys. Res., 116, B02305, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, G. E. (1977). Interpreting the seismic glut moments of total degree two or less. Geophys. J. Roy Astr. Soc., 51, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, G. E. and Mulcahy, M. (1976a). Moment tensors and other phenomenological descriptions of seismic waves. I. Continuous displacements. Geophys. J. Roy Astr. Soc., 46, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, G. E. and Mulcahy, M. (1976b). Moment tensors and other phenomenological descriptions of seismic waves. II. Discontinuous displacements. Geophys. J. Roy Astr. Soc., 47, 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbot, S., Lapusta, N. and Avouac, J. P. (2012). Under the hood of the earthquake machine: toward predictive modeling of the seismic cycle. Science, 336, 707–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barenblatt, G. I. (1959a). The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 23, 622–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barenblatt, G. I. (1959b). On equilibrium cracks, formed in brittle fracture. Doklady, USSR Academy of Sciences, 127, 47–50 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Barenblatt, G. I. (1962). The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv. Appl. Mech., 7, 55–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barka, A., Akyüz, H. S., Altunel, E., Sunal, G., Cakir, Z., Dikbas, A. et al. (2002). The surface rupture and slip distribution of the August 17, 1999 Izmit earthquake, M 7.4, North Anatolian Fault. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Båth, M. (1965). Lateral inhomogeneities of the upper mantle. Tectonophys., 2, 483–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beeler, N. M. and Tullis, T. E. (1996). Self-healing slip pulses in dynamic rupture models due to velocity dependent strength. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 1130–1148.Google Scholar

Beeler, N. M., Tullis, T. E. and Weeks, J. D. (1994). The roles of time and displacement in the evolution effect in rock friction. Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1987–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben Menahem, A. (1961). Radiation of seismic surface waves from finite moving sources. Bull. Seism. Soc Am., 51, 401–453.Google Scholar

Ben Menahem, A. (1962). Radiation of seismic body waves from finite moving sources in the earth. J. Geophys. Res., 67, 396–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben Menahem, A. and Singh, S. J. (1981). Seismic Waves and Sources. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berckhemer, H. (1962). Die Ausdehnung der Bruchfläche im Erdbebenherd und ihr Einfluss auf das seismiche Wellenspektrum. Gerland Beitr. Geophys., 71, 5–26.Google Scholar

Bernard, P. and Madariaga, R. (1984). A new asymptotic method for the modeling of near-field accelerograms. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 74, 539–557,Google Scholar

Bilich, A., Cassidy, J. F. and Larson, K. (2008). GPS seismology: application to the 2002 MW 7.9 Denali fault earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 98, 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bizzarri, A. and Cocco, M. (2003). Slip-weakening behavior during the propagation of dynamic ruptures obeying rate- and state-dependent friction laws. J. Geophys. Res., 108, . Issn: 0148-0227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bizzarri, A. and Das, S. (2012). Mechanics of 3-D shear cracks between Rayleigh and shear wave rupture speeds. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 357–358, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boatwright, J. (1978). Detailed spectral analysis of two small New York state earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 68, 1117–1131.Google Scholar

Bodin, P. and Brune, J. N. (1996). On the scaling of slip and rupture for shallow strike-slip earthquakes: quasi-static models and dynamic rupture propagation. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 86, 1292–1299.Google Scholar

Boore, D. M., Stephens, C. and Joyner, W. B. (2002). Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 1543–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M. (1981). A simple method to calculate Green's function for elastic layered media. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 959–971.Google Scholar

Bouchon, M. (1982). The complete synthesis of seismic crustal phases at regional distances. J. Geophys. Res. B, 87, 2156–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M. (1997). The state of stress on some faults of the San Andreas system as inferred from near-field strong motion data. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 1731–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M. and Vallée, M. (2003). Observation of long supershear rupture during the M = 8.1 Kunlunshan (Tibet) earthquake. Science, 301, 824–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M., Bouin, M., Karabulut, H., Toksöz, M. N., Dietrich, M. and Rosakis, A. J. (2001). How fast is rupture during an earthquake? New insights from the 1999 Turkey earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2723–2726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M., Durand, V., Marsan, D., Karabulut, H. and Schmittbuhl, J. (2012). The long precursory phase of most large interplate earthquakes. Nature Geosci., 6, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouchon, M., Toksoz, N., Karabulut, H., Bouin, M.-P., Dieterich, M., Aktar, M. et al. (2002). Space and time evolution of rupture and faulting during the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 92, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brace, W. F. and Walsh, J. B. (1962). Some direct measurements of the surface energy of quartz and orthoclase. Amer. Mineral., 47, 111–112.Google Scholar

Bracewell, R. (1965). The Fourier Transform and its Applications. New York: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Brantut, N. and Rice, J. R. (2011). How pore fluid pressurization influences crack tip processes during dynamic rupture. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L24314, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brillinger, D. R., Udías, A. and Bolt, B. A. (1980). A probability model for regional focal mechanism solutions. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 149–170.Google Scholar

Broberg, K. B. (1999). Cracks and Fracture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Brodsky, E. E., Gilchrist, J. G., Sagy, A. and Colletini, C. (2011). Faults smooth gradually as a function of slip. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 302, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brune, J. N. (1970). Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4997–5009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brune, J. N. (1971). Correction. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5002.Google Scholar

Buforn, E. (1994). Métodos para la determinación del mecanismo focal de los terremotos. Fisica de la Tierra, 6, 113–139.Google Scholar

Burridge, R. (1969). The numerical solution of certain integral equations with non-integral kernel arising in the theory of cracks propagation and elastic wave diffraction. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 265, 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burridge, R. and Halliday, G. S. (1977). Dynamic shear cracks with friction as models for shallow focus earthquakes. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 25, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burridge, R. and Knopoff, L. (1964). Body force equivalents for seismic dislocations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 54, 1875–1888.Google Scholar

Burridge, R. and Knopoff, L. (1967). Model and theoretical seismicity. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 57, 341–371.Google Scholar

Byerly, P. (1928). The nature of the first motion in the Chilean earthquake of November 11, 1922. Am. J. Sci. (series 5), 16, 232–236.Google Scholar

Candela, T., Renard, F., Klinger, Y., Mair, K., Schmittbuhl, J. and Brodsky, E. E. (2012). Roughness of fault surfaces over nine decades of length scales. J. Geophys. Res., 117, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, J. M. and Langer, J. S. (1989). Properties of earthquakes generated by fault dynamics. Phys Rev. Lett. 32, 2632–2635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cesca, S., Buforn, E. and Dahm, T. (2006). Moment tensor inversion of shallow earthquakes in Spain. Geophys. J. Int., 166, 839–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cesca, S., Heimann, S., Stammler, K. and Dahm, T. (2010). Automated point and kinematic source inversion at regional distances. J. Geophys. Res., 115, B06304, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, C. H. (1978). A new method for computing synthetic seismograms. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 54, 481–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Y. T. and Xu, L. S. (2000). A time-domain inversion technique for the tempo-spatial distribution of slip on a finite fault with applications to recent large earthquakes in the Tibetan plateau. Geophys. J. Int., 143, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocco, M. and Bizzari, A. (2002). On the slip-weakening behavior of rate and state friction laws. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochard, A. and Madariaga, R. (1994). Dynamic faulting under rate depending friction. Pageoph., 142, 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochard, A. and Madariaga, R. (1996). Complexity of seismicity due to high rate-dependent friction. J. Geophys. Res., 101, 25 321–25 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corish, S. C., Bradley, R. and Olsen, K. B. (2007). Assessment of a nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion technique. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 901–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottrell, A. H. and Bilby, B. (1949). Dislocation theory of yielding and strain ageing of iron. Proc. Phys. Soc. A, 62, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coutant, O. (1990). Programme de simulation numerique AXITRA, Rapport LGIT. University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.

Cowie, P. A. and Scholz, C. H. (1992). Displacement–length scaling relationship for faults: data synthesis and discussion. J. Struct. Geol., 14, 1149–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruz-Atienza, V. M. and Virieux, J. (2004). Dynamic rupture simulation of non-planar faults with a finite-difference approach. Geophys. J. Int., 158, 939–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Custodio, S., Liu, P. and Archuleta, R. J. (2005). The 2004 MW 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: inversion of near-source ground motion using multiple data sets. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L23312, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlen, F. A. and Tromp, J. (1998). Theoretical Global Seismology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dahm, T. (1996). Relative moment tensor inversion based on ray theory: theory and synthetic tests. Geophys. J. Int., 124, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahm, T. and Krüger, F. (1999). Higher-degree moment tensor inversion using far-field broad-band recordings: theory and evaluation of the method with application to the 1994 Bolivia earthquake. Geophys. J. Int., 137, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahm, T., Manthei, G. and Eisenblatter, J. (1999). Automated moment tensor inversion to estimate source mechanisms of hydraulically induced micro-seismicity in salt rock. Tectonophys., 306, 1–17, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalguer, L. A. and Day, S. M. (2006). Comparison of fault representation methods in finite difference simulations of dynamic rupture. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 96, 1764–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalguer, L. A. and Day, S. M. (2007). Staggered-grid split-node method for spontaneous rupture simulation. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B02302, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, S. (1980). A numerical method for determination of source time functions for general 3 dimensional rupture propagation. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 62, 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, S. and Aki, K. (1977a). Fault planes with barriers: a versatile earthquake model. J. Geophys. Res., 82, 5648–5670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, S. and Aki, K. (1977b). A numerical study of two dimensional spontaneous rupture propagation. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 50, 643–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, S. and Kostrov, B. V. (1983). Breaking of a single asperity: rupture process and seismic radiation. J. Geophys. Res., 88, 4277–4288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, S. and Kostrov, B. V. (1997). Determination of the polynomial moments of the seismic moment rate density distribution with positivity constraints. Geophys. J. Int., 131, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, S. M. (1982). Three dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture, the effect of non uniform prestress. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 1881–1902.Google Scholar

Delouis, B., Lundgren, P., Salichon, J. and Giardini, D. (2000). Joint inversion of InSAR and teleseismic data for the slip history of the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3389–3392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deschamps, A., Lyon-Caen, H. and Madariaga, R. (1980). Mise au point sur les méthodes de calcul de séismogrammes synthétiques de long périod. Ann. Géophys., 36, 167–178.Google Scholar

Di Carli, S., Francois-Holden, C., Peyrat, S. and Madariaga, R. (2010). Dynamic inversion of the 2000 Tottori earthquake based on elliptical subfault approximations. J. Geophys. Res., 115, B12 328, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Di Toro, G., Han, R., Hirose, T., De Paola, N., Mizoguchi, S. N. K., Ferri, F. et al. (2011). Fault lubrication during earthquakes, Nature, 471, 494–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dieterich, J. H. (1979a). Modeling of rock friction. 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2161–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dieterich, J. H. (1979b). Modeling of rock friction. 2. Simulation of preseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2169–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dieterich, J. H. (1992). Earthquake nucleation on faults with rate and state-dependent strength. Tectonophys., 21, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dieterich, J. H. (2007) Application of rate-and-state-dependent friction to models of fault slip and earthquake occurrence. In: Earthquake Seismology, eds. Schubert, G., and Kanamori, H., Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 4, pp.107–129. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Doornbos, D. J. (1982). Seismic moment tensors and kinematic source parameters. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 69, 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreger, D. S. (1994). Empirical Green's function study of the January 17, 1994 Northridge, California earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2633–2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreger, D. S. and Helmberger, D. V. (1993). Determination of source parameters at regional distances with three-component sparse network data. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 8107–8125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duan, B. (2010). Role of initial stress rotations in rupture dynamics and ground motion: a case study with implications for the Wenchuan earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., 115, B05301, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duan, B. and Oglesby, D. D. (2006). Heterogeneous fault stresses from previous earthquakes and the effect on dynamics of parallel strike–slip faults. J. Geophys. Res., 111, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugdale, D. S. (1960). Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 8, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunham, E. M. and Archuleta, R. J. (2004). Evidence of supershear transient during the 2002 Denali Fault earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94, S256–S268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A. M. and Anderson, D. L. (1981). Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 25, 297–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dziewonski, A. M. and Woodhouse, J. H. (1983). Studies of the seismic source using normal mode theory. In: Earthquakes: Observation, Theory and Interpretation, eds. Kanamori, H. and Boschi, E., pp. 45–137. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar

Dziewonski, A. M., Chou, T. A. and Woodhouse, J. H. (1981). Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2825–2852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellsworth, W. L. and Beroza, G. C. (1995). Seismic evidence for an earthquake nucleation phase. Science, 268, 851–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Engdahl, E. R., and Villaseñor, A. (2002). Global seismicity: 1900–1999. In: International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, eds. Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C. and Kisslinger, C., Part A, pp. 665–690. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eshelby, J. D. (1957). The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 241, 376–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eshelby, J. D. (1959). The elastic field outside an ellipsoidal inclusion. Proc. Royal Soc. A, 252, 561–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fossum, A. F. and Freund, L. B. (1975). Non uniformly moving shear crack model of a shallow focus earthquake mechanism. J. Geophys. Res., 80, 3343–3347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, L. B. (1972a). Crack propagation in an elastic solid subjected to general loading. I. Constant rate of extension. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 20, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, L. B. (1972b). Energy flux into the tip of an extending crack in an elastic solid. J. Elasticity, 2, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, L. B. (1979). The mechanics of dynamic shear crack propagation. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2199–2209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fröhlich, C. (2006). Deep Earthquakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, K. and Müller, G. (1971). Computation of synthetic seismograms with the reflectivity method and comparison with observations. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 23, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, E. and Irikura, K. (1986). Rupture process of the 1983 Japan Sea (Akita-Oki) earthquake using a wave form inversion method. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 76, 1623–1649.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, E. and Madariaga, R. (1998). Rupture dynamics of a planar fault in a 3D elastic medium: rate and slip weakening friction. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1–17.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, E. and Mikumo, T. (1993). Dynamic rupture analysis: inversion for the process of the 1990 Izu-Oshima, Japan, earthquake (M = 6.5). J. Geophys. Res., 98, 6529–6542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gel'fand, I. M. and Shilov, G. E. (1964). Generalized Functions. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gershanik, S. (1996). Sismología. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de la Plata.Google Scholar

Gilbert, F. (1970). Excitation of the normal modes of the Earth by earthquakes sources. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 22, 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldsby, L. and Tullis, T. E. (2011). Flash heating leads to low frictional strength of crustal rocks at earthquake slip rates. Science, 334, 216–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Griffith, A. (1921). The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 221, 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guatteri, M., and Spudich, P. (2000). What can strong-motion data tell us about slip-weakening fault-friction laws?Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 90, 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gubbins, D. (1990). Seismology and Plate Tectonics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. (1942). Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 32, 163–191.Google Scholar

Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. (1954). Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena. 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. (1956). Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper). Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 46, 105–145.Google Scholar

Han, R., Shimamoto, T., Hirose, T., Ree, J. H. and Ando, J. (2007). Ultralow friction of carbonate faults caused by thermal decomposition. Science, 316, 878–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hanks, T. C. (1977). Earthquake stress-drops, ambient tectonics stresses and stresses that drive plates. Pure Appl. Geophysics, 115, 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanks, T. C. and Kanamori, H. (1979). A moment magnitude scale. J. Geophys. Res, 84, 2348–2350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanks, T. C. and Wyss, M. (1972). The use of body-wave spectra in the determination of seismic source parameters. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 62, 561–589.Google Scholar

Harris, R., and Day, S. (1993), Dynamics of fault interaction: parallel strike–slip faults. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 4461–4472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, R. A., Barall, M., Archuleta, R., Dunham, E., Aagaard, B., Ampuero, J. P. et al. (2009). The SCEC/USGS dynamic earthquake rupture code verification exercise. Seismol. Res. Lett., 80, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, S. H. (1978). Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophys. Res. Lett., 5, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartzell, S. H. and Heaton, T. H. (1983). Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 73, 1553–1583.Google Scholar

Haskell, N. A. (1964). Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 54, 1811–1841.Google Scholar

Haskell, N. A. (1966). Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults, Part II. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 56, 125–140.Google Scholar

Havskov, J. and Ottemöller, L. (2010). Routine Data Processing in Earthquake Seismology. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heaton, T. H. (1990). Evidence for and implications of self-healing pulses of slip in earthquake rupture. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 64, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heimann, S. (2001). A robust method to estimate kinematic earthquake source parameters. Doctoral thesis, University of Hamburg.

Helmberger, D. V. (1974). Generalized ray theory for shear dislocations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 64, 45–64.Google Scholar

Herrero, A. and Bernard, P. (1994). A kinematic self-similar rupture process for earthquakes. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 2037–2062.Google Scholar

Hirasawa, T. and Stauder, W. (1965). On the seismic body waves from a finite moving source. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 55, 237–262.Google Scholar

Houston, H., Benz, H., and Vidale, J. E. (1998). Time functions of deep earthquakes from broadband and short period stacks. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 29 895–29 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, J. A. (1980). The Excitation and Propagation of Elastic Waves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Husseini, M. I. and Randall, M. J. (1976). Rupture velocity and radiation efficiency. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 66, 1173–1187.Google Scholar

Husseini, M. J., Jovanovich, D. B., Randall, M. J. and Freund, L. B. (1975). The fracture energy of earthquakes. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 43, 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ida, Y. (1972). Cohesive forces across the tip of a longitudinal shear crack and Griffith's specific surface energy. J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3796–3805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ida, Y. (1973). Stress concentration and unsteady propagation of longitudinal shear cracks. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 3418–3429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, S. (2002). Estimation of radiated energy of finite-source earthquake models. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 2994–3005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, S. and Takeo, M. (1997). Determination of constitutive relations of fault slip based on seismic wave analysis. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 27 379–27 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, S., Beroza, G., Prejean, S. and Ellsworth, W. (2003). Apparent break in earthquake scaling due to path and site effects on deep borehole recordings. J. Geophys. Res., 108, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irwin, G. R. (1957). Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack transversing a plate. J. Appl. Mech., 64, 361–364.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, H. (1931). On the cause of oscillatory movements in seismograms. Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. Geophys. Suppl., 2, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, L. R. and Nadeau, R. M. (2002). Asperity model of an earthquake: static problem. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92, 672–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, L. R. and Nadeau, R. M. (2005). Asperity model of an earthquake: dynamic problem. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 95, 75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jost, M. L. and Herrmann, R. B. (1989). A student's guide to and review of moment tensors. Seism. Res. Lett., 60, 37–57.Google Scholar

Kame, N. and Yamashita, T. (1997). Dynamic nucleation process of shallow earthquake faulting on a fault zone. Geophys. J. Int., 128, 204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kame, N. and Yamashita, T. (1999a). A new light on arresting mechanism of dynamic earthquake faulting. Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1997–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kame, N. and Yamashita, T. (1999b). Simulation of the spontaneous growth of a dynamic crack without constraints on the crack tip path. Geophys. J. Int., 139, 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanamori, H. (2004). The diversity of the physics of earthquakes. Proc. Japan Acad. B, 80, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanamori, H. and Anderson, D. L. (1975). Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65, 1073–1095.Google Scholar

Kanamori, H. and Brodsky, E. E. (2004). The physics of earthquakes. Rep. Progr. Phys., 67, 1429–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanamori, H. and Given, J. W. (1981). Use of long period surface waves for rapid determination of earthquake source parameters. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 27, 8–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanamori, H. and Steward, G. S. (1978). Seismological aspects of the Guatemala earthquake of February 4, 1976. J. Geophys. Res., 83, 3427–3434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaneko, Y., Avouac, J. P. and Lapusta, N. (2010). Towards inferring earthquake patterns from geodetic observations of interseismic coupling. Nature Geosci., 3, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasahara, K. (1963). Computer program for a fault plane solution. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 53, 1–13.Google Scholar

Kasahara, K. (1981). Earthquake Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kennet, B. L. N. (1981). Seismic waves in a stratified half space – II. Theoretical seismograms. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 61, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennet, B. L. N. (2001). The Seismic Wavefield. Vol. I: Introduction and Theoretical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kennet, B. L. N. and Engdahl, E. R. (1991). Traveltime for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys. J. Int., 105, 429–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keylis-Borok, B. V. (1956). Methods and results of the investigation of earthquake mechanism. Publ. Bureau Central Seism. Inter. Ser A. Trav. Scient., 19, 205–14.Google Scholar

Keylis-Borok, B. V. (1959). On the estimation of the displacement in an earthquake source and of source dimensions. Ann. Geofisica, 12, 205–214.Google Scholar

Keylis-Borok, V. I., Pistetskii-Shapiro, I. I., Pisarenko, V. F. and Zhelankina, T. S. (1972). Computer determination of earthquake mechanism. In: Computational Seismology. New York: Plenum Publishing.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, M. and Kanamori, H. (1982). Inversion of complex body waves. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 491–506.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, M. and Kanamori, H. (1991). Inversion of complex body waves III. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 2335–2350.Google Scholar

Knopoff, L. (1958). Energy release in earthquakes. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 1, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knopoff, L. (1961). Analytical calculation of the fault-plane problem. Publ. Dominion Observatory, 24, 309–315.Google Scholar

Knopoff, L. (1967). The mathematics of the seismic source. Institute of Geophysics, University of Karlsruhe (unpublished lecture notes).

Knopoff, L. and Gilbert, F. (1960). First motions from seismic sources. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 50, 117–134.Google Scholar

Knopoff, L. and Randall, M. (1970). The compensated vector linear dipole: a possible mechanism for deep earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4957–4963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, K. (1991). Moment tensor inversion of local earthquake data. Investigation of the method and its numerical stability with model calculations. Geophys. J. Int., 106, 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostrov, B. V. (1964). Self-similar problems of propagation of shear cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 28, 1077–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostrov, B. V. (1966). Unsteady propagation of longitudinal cracks. J. Appl. Math. Mech., 30, 1241–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostrov, B. V. (1975). On the crack propagation with variable velocity. Int. J. Fracture, 11, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostrov, B. V. and Das, S. (1982). Idealized models of fault behavior prior to dynamic rupture. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 679–703.Google Scholar

Kostrov, B. V. and Das, S. (1988). Principles of Earthquake Source Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kostrov, B. V. and Nikitin, L. V. (1970). Some general problems of mechanics of brittle fracture. Archiwum Mechaniki Stosowanej, 22, 749–776.Google Scholar

Lamb, H. (1904). On the propagation of tremors over the surface of an elastic solid. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 203, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lancieri, M., Madariaga, R. and Bonilla, F. (2012). Spectral scaling of the aftershocks of the Tocopilla 2007 earthquake in northern Chile. Geophys. J. Int., 188, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapwood, E. R. (1949). The disturbance to a line source in a semi-infinite elastic medium. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. A, 242, 63–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, K. (2009). GPS seismology. J. Geod., 83, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lay, T. and Wallace, T. C. (1995). Modern Global Seismology. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Liu, P., Archuleta, R. J. and Hartzell, S. H. (2006). Prediction of broadband ground-motion time histories: hybrid low/high-frequency method with correlated random source parameters. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 96, 2118–2130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, A. E. H. (1927). The Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. 4th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luco, J. E. and Apsel, R. J. (1982). On the Green’s functions for a layered half-space: Part I. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 275–302.Google Scholar

Luco, J. E. and Apsel, R. J. (1983). On the Green function for a layered half-space: Part II. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 73, 909–929.Google Scholar

Ma, S., Custodio, S., Archuleta, R. and Liu, P. (2008). Dynamic modeling of the 2004 MW 6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., 113, B02 301, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCaffrey, R., Abers, G. and Zwick, P. (1991). Inversion of teleseismic body waves. In: Digital Seismogram Analysis and Wave Form Inversion, ed. Lee, W. H. K.. IASPEI Software Library, vol. 3, pp. 81–166.Google Scholar

Madariaga, R. (1976). Dynamics of an expanding circular fault. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 66, 639–666.Google Scholar

Madariaga, R. (1977). High frequency radiation from crack (stress drop) models of earthquake faulting. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 51, 525–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madariaga, R. (1979). On the relation between seismic moment and stress drop in the presence of stress and strength heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res., 84, 2243–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madariaga, R. (2009). Seismic source theory. In: Earthquake Seismology (Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 4), eds. Kanamori, H. and Schubert, G., pp. 59–82. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Madariaga, R. and Cochard, A. (1994). Seismic source dynamics, heterogeneity and friction. Ann. Geofis., 37, 1349–1375.Google Scholar

Madariaga, R. and Olsen, K. B. (2000). Criticality of rupture dynamics in three dimensions. Pageoph., 157, 1981–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madariaga, R. and Olsen, K. B. (2002). Earthquake dynamics. In: Int. Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, vol. 81A, pp. 175–194.

Madariaga, R., Olsen, K. B. and Archuleta, R. (1998). Modeling dynamic rupture in a 3D earthquake fault model. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1182–1197.Google Scholar

Mai, P. M. and Beroza, G. C. (2002). A spatial random field model to characterize complexity in earthquake slip. J. Geophys. Res., 107, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marone, C. (1998). Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 26, 643–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGarr, A. and Fletcher, J. B. (2003). Maximum slip in earthquake fault zones, apparent stress, and stick-slip friction. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 93, 2355–2362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, J. J. (2004). Estimating finite source properties of small earthquake ruptures. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, J. J., Zhao, Li and Jordan, H. (2001). Teleseismic inversion for the second-degree moment of earthquake space–time distributions. Geophys. J. Int., 145, 661–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mendiguren, J. (1977). Inversion of surface wave data in source mechanism studies. J. Geophys. Res., 82, 889–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menke, W. (2012). Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory. 3rd edn. Waltham, Massachusetts: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Mikumo, T. (1992). Dynamic fault rupture and stress recovery processes in continental crust under depth dependent shear strength and frictional parameters. Tectonophys., 211, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikumo, T. (1994). Dynamic fault rupture of moderate size earthquakes inferred from the results of kinematic wave form inversion. Ann. Geofis., 37, 1377–1389.Google Scholar

Mikumo, T. and Miyatake, T. (1978). Dynamic rupture process on a three-dimensional fault with non-uniform friction and near field seismic waves. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 54, 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mikumo, T. and Miyatake, T. (1995). Heterogenous distribution of dynamic stress drop and relative fault strength recovered from the results of wave form inversion: the 1984 Morgan Hill, California earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 85, 178–193.Google Scholar

Mikumo, T., Fukuyama, E., Olsen, K. B. and Yagi, Y. (2003). Stress breakdown time and critical weakening slip inferred from the slip-velocity function on earthquakes faults. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 93, 264–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mizoguchi, K., Hirose, T., Shimamoto, T., and Fukuyama, E. (2007). Reconstruction of seismic faulting by high-velocity friction experiments: an example of the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L01 308, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molnar, P., Tucker, B. E. and Brune, J. N. (1973). Corner frequency of P and S waves and models of earthquakes sources. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 63, 101–104.Google Scholar

Morse, P. M. and Feshbach, H. (1953). Methods of Theoretical Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Müller, G. (1985). The reflectivity method: a tutorial. J. Geophys., 58, 153–174.Google Scholar

Muskhelishvili, N. I. (1973). Singular Integral Equations. Groningen, Netherlands: P. Noordho.Google Scholar

Nabelek, J. L. (1984). Determination of earthquake source parameters from inversion of body waves. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Nakano, H. (1923). Notes on the nature of forces which give rise to the earthquakes motion. Seism. Bull. Cent. Meteor. Obs. Japan, 1, 92–120.Google Scholar

Nielsen, S. and Madariaga, R. (2003). On the self-healing fracture mode. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 93, 2375–2388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nishimura, G. (1937). On the elastic waves due to pressure variations on the inner surface of a spherical cavity in an elastic solid. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo, 15, 614–635.Google Scholar

Noda, H., Dunham, E. M., and Rice, J. R. (2009). Earthquake ruptures with thermal weakening and the operation of major faults at low overall stress levels, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B07 302, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 401, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohnaka, M. (2000). Physical scaling relation between the size of an earthquake and its nucleation zone size. Pageoph., 157, 2259–2282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohnaka, M. (2013). The Physics of Rock Failure and Earthquakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okada, Y. (1992). Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 82, 1018–1040.Google Scholar

Okubo, P. G. (1989). Dynamic rupture modeling with laboratory-derived constitutive relations. J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12 321–12 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, K. B., Madariaga, R. and Archuleta, R. J. (1997). Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of the 1992 Landers earthquake. Science, 278, 834–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, K. B., Day, S. M., Dalguer, L. A., Mayhew, J., Cui, Y., Zhu, J. et al. (2009). ShakeOut-D: ground motion estimates using an ensemble of large earthquakes on the southern San Andreas fault with spontaneous. rupture propagation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L04 303, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, H., Orcutt, J. A. and Frazier, G. A. (1984). The discreet wavenumber/finite element method for synthetic seismograms. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 77, 421–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Omori, F. (1894). On the aftershocks of earthquakes. J. Coll. Sci., Imperial University of Tokyo, 7, 111–200.Google Scholar

Palmer, A. C. and Rice, J. R. (1973). The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of over-consolidated clay. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 332, 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panza, G. (1985). Synthetic seismograms: the Rayleigh waves modal summation. J. Geophys., 58, 125–145.Google Scholar

Passelègue, F. X., Schubnel, A., Nielsen, S., Bhat, H. S., and Madariaga, R. (2013). From sub-Rayleigh to supershear ruptures during stick–slip experiments on rocks. Science, 340, 1208–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peyrat, S. (2001). Modélisation des tremblements de terre: rupture, rayonnement et inversion. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris Sud.

Peyrat, S. and Olsen, K. B. (2004). Nonlinear dynamic rupture inversion of the 2000 Western Tottori, Japan, earthquake, .

Peyrat, S., Olsen, K. B. and Madariaga, R. (2001). Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 26 467–26 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peyrat, S., Olsen, K. B.. and Madariaga, R. (2004). Which dynamic parameters can be estimated from strong ground motion?Pageoph., 161, 2155–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poliakov, A., Dmowska, R., and Rice, J. R. (2002). Dynamic shear rupture interactions with fault bends and off-axis secondary faulting, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2295, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prawirodirjo, L. and Bock, Y. (2004). Instantaneous global plate motion model from 12 years of continuous GPS observations. J. Geophys. Res., 109, .Google Scholar

Pro, C. (2002). Estudio del efecto de directividad en la forma de ondas. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Pujol, J. and Herrmann, R. H. (1990). Student's guide to point sources in homogeneous media. Seism. Res. Lett., 61, 209–224.Google Scholar

Reasenberg, P. and Oppenheimer, D. (1985). FPFIT, FPPLOT and FPPAGE: Fortran computer programs for calculating and displaying earthquake fault-plane solutions. US Geological Survey, Open File Report, pp. 85–739.

Reches, Z. and Lockner, D. A. (1994). Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle rocks. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 18 159–18 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, H. F. (1911). The elastic rebound theory of earthquakes. Bull. Dept. Geol., University of California, 6, 412–444.Google Scholar

Rice, J. R. (1968). A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J. Appl. Mech., 35, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, J. R. (1980). The mechanics of earthquake rupture. In: Physics of Earth's Interior, eds. Dziewonski, A. M. and Boschi, E., pp. 555–649. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Rice, J. R. and Ruina, A. L. (1983). Stability of steady frictional slipping. J. Appl. Mech., 50, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rice, J. R., Lapusta, N. and Ranjith, K. (2001). Rate and state dependent friction and the stability of sliding between elastically deformable solids. J. Mech. Phys. Sol., 49, 1865–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romanowicz, B. (1982). Moment tensor inversion of long period Rayleigh waves. A new approach. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 5395–5407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romanowicz, B. (1992). Strike–slip earthquakes on quasi-vertical transcurrent faults: inferences for general scaling relations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1944–1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosakis, A., Samadrula, J. O. and Coker, D. (1999). Cracks faster than the shear wave speed. Science, 248, 1337–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, A. M. and Ampuero, J.-P. (2005). Earthquake nucleation on (aging) rate and state faults, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B11 312, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruina, A. (1983). Slip instability and state variable friction law. J. Geophys. Res., 88, 10 359–10 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruiz, S. and Madariaga, R. (2013). Kinematic and dynamic inversion of the 2008 Northern Iwate earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 103, 694–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sambridge, M. (1999). Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm – I. Searching a parameter space. Geophys. J. Int., 138, 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sambridge, M. (2001). Finding acceptable models in nonlinear inverse problems using a neighbourhood algorithm. Inverse Problems, 17, 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sato, T. and Hirasawa, T. (1973). Body wave spectra from propagating shear cracks. J. Phys. Earth, 21, 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, J. C. (1966). Radiation from a realistic model of faulting. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 56, 577–592.Google Scholar

Savage, J. C. (1972). Relation of corner frequency to fault dimensions. J. Geophys. Res., 77, 3788–3795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, J. C. and Burford, R. O. (1973). Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California. J. Geophys. Res., 78, 832–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, J. C. and Wood, M. D. (1971). The relation between apparent stress and stress drop. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 61, 1381–1388.Google Scholar

Scherbaum, F. (1996). Of Poles and Zeros. Fundamentals of Digital Seismology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmedes, J., Archuleta, R. J. and Lavallée, D. (2010). Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 115, CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmedes, J., Archuleta, R. J., and Lavallée, D. (2013). A kinematic rupture model generator incorporating spatial interdependency of earthquake source parameters. Geophys. J. Int., 192, 1116–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scholz, C. H. (1990). The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scholz, C. H. (2007). Fault mechanics. In: Treatise on Geophysics, ed. Watts, A. B., vol. 6, pp. 441–483. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwab, F., Nakanishi, K., Cuscito, M., Panza, G. F., Liang, G. and Frez, J. (1984). Surface wave computations and the synthesis of theoretical seismograms at high frequencies. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 74, 1555–1578.Google Scholar

Shimazaki, K. (1986). Small and large earthquakes: the effect of the thickness of the seismogenic layer and the free surface. Earthquake Source Mechanics, AGU Geophys. Mon., 37. American Geophysical Union, pp. 209–216.Google Scholar

Silver, P. G. and Jordan, T. H. (1982). Optimal estimation of scalar seismic moment. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 70, 755–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silver, P. G. and Jordan, T. H. (1983). Total moment spectra of fourteen large earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3273–3299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sin Vigny, C., Socquet, A., Peyrat, S., Ruegg, J.-C., Metois, M., Madariaga, R. et al. (2011). The 2010 MW 8.8 Maule mega-thrust earthquake of Central Chile, monitored by GPS. Science, 331, 1417–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sipkin, S. A. (1982). Estimation of earthquake source parameters by the inversion of wave form data: synthetic waveforms. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 30, 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sipkin, S. A. (1986). Estimation of earthquake source parameters by the inversion of waveform data. Global seismicity, 1981–1983. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 76, 1515–1541.Google Scholar

Sipkin, S. A. (1994). Rapid determination of global moment-tensor solutions. Geophys. Res. Letters, 21, 1667–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Somerville, P., Irikura, K., Graves, R., Sawada, S., Wald, D., Kagawa, Y. I. T. et al. (1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seism. Res. Letters, 70, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spudich, P. and Cranswick, E. (1984). Direct observation of rupture propagation during the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake using a short baseline accelerometer array. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 74, 2083–2114.Google Scholar

Spudich, P. and Frazer, L. N. (1984). Use of ray theory to calculate high-frequency radiation from earthquake sources having spatially variable rupture velocity and stress drop. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 2061–2082.Google Scholar

Steketee, J. A. (1958). Some geophysical applications of the theory of dislocations. Can. J. Phys. 36, 1168–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strelitz, R. A. (1978). Moment tensor inversion and source models. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 52, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strelitz, R. A. (1989). Choosing the best double couple from a moment tensor inversion. Geophys. J. Int., 99, 811–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stump, B. W. and Johnson, L. R. (1977). The determination of source properties by linear inversion of seismograms. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 67, 1489–1502.Google Scholar

Suzuki, W., Aoi, S. and Sekiguchi, H. (2009). Rupture process of the 2008 northern Iwate intraslab earthquake derived from strong-motion records. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 99, 2825–2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tago, J., Cruz-Atienza, V. M., Virieux, J., Etienne, V. and Sánchez-Sesma, F. J. (2012). A 3D hp-adaptive discontinuous Galerkin method for modeling earthquake dynamics. J. Geophys. Res., 117, B09 312, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tapley, W. C. and Tull, J. E. (1992). Guide to the UNIX version of SAC. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California.

Tarantola, A. (1987). Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Thio, H. K. and Kanamori, H. (1995). Moment-tensor inversions for local earthquakes using surface waves recorded at TERRAscope. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 85, 1021–1038.Google Scholar

Tinti, E., Spudich, P. and Cocco, M. (2005a). Earthquake fracture energy inferred from kinematic rupture models on extended faults, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B12 303, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinti, E., Fukuyama, E., Piatanesi, A. and Cocco, M. (2005b). A kinematic source time function compatible with earthquake dynamics. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 95, 1211–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinti, E., Cocco, M., Fukuyama, E. and Piatanesi, A. (2009). Dependence of slip weakening distance (D) on final slip during dynamic rupture of earthquakes. Geophys. J. Int., 177, 1205–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toda, S., Stein, R. S., Sevilgen, V. and Lin, J. (2011). Coulomb 3.3 graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching – User guide. US Geological Survey Open File Report 2011-1060, 63 pp., available at .

Tsuboi, C. (1956). Earthquake energy, earthquake volume, aftershock area and strength of the earth's crust. J. Phys. Earth, 4, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsutsumi, A. and Miyamoto, T. (1997). High-velocity frictional properties of gabbro. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 699–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twardzik, C., Madariaga, R., Das, S. and Custodio, S. (2012). Robust features of the source process for the 2004 Parkfield, California, earthquake from strong-motion seismograms. Geophys. J. Int., 191, 1245–1254.Google Scholar

Udías, A. (1971). Source parameters of earthquakes from spectra of Rayleigh waves. Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 22, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Udías, A. (1989). Development of fault plane studies for the mechanism of earthquakes. In: Observatory Seismology, ed. Litehisser, J. J., pp. 243–256. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Udías, A. (1999). Principles of Seismology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Udías, A. and Buforn, E. (1988). Single and joint fault-plane solutions from first data. In: Seismological Algorithms, ed. Doornbos, D., pp. 443–453. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Vallée, M. and Bouchon, M. (2004). Imaging coseismic rupture in far field by slip patches. Geophys. J. Int., 156, 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vallée, M., Landès, M., Shapiro, N. M. and Klinger, Y. (2008). The 2001/11/14 Kokoxili (Tibet) earthquake: high frequency seismic radiation originates from the transitions between subRayleigh and supershear rupture velocity regimes. J. Geophys. Res., 113, B07 305, .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Virieux, J. and Madariaga, R. (1982). Dynamic faulting studied by a finite difference method. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 72, 345–369.Google Scholar

Vvedenskaya, A. V. (1956). Determination of displacement fields for earthquakes by means of the dislocation theory. Izv. Akad. Nauka SSSR, Geofiz., 3, 277–284 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Wald, D. J. and Heaton, T. H. (1994). Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 668–691.Google Scholar

Weertman, J. (1967). Uniformly moving transonic and supersonic dislocations. J. Appl. Phys., 38, 5293–5302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wesnouzky, S. G. (1998). The Gutenberg–Richter or characteristic earthquake distribution, which is it?Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1940–1959.Google Scholar

Wickens, A. J. and Hogdson, J. H. (1967). Computer reevaluation of earthquake mechanism solutions. Publ. Dominion Observatory, 33, 1–560.Google Scholar

Wyss, M. and Brune, J. N. (1967). The Alaska earthquake of March 28, 1964. A complex multiple event. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 57, 1017–1023.Google Scholar

Wyss, M. and Brune, J. N. (1968). Seismic moment, stress and source dimensions for earthquakes in the California-Nevada region. J. Geophys. Res., 73, 4681–4694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xia, K., Rosakis, A. J. and Kanamori, H. (2004). Laboratory earthquakes: the sub-Rayleigh-to-supershear transition. Science, 303, 1859–861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yagi, Y. and Kikuchi, M. (2000). Source rupture process of the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999, obtained by joint inversion of near-field data and teleseismic data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1969–1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yamashita, T. and Ohnaka, M. (1991). Nucleation process of unstable rupture in the brittle regime: theoretical approach based on experimentally inferred relations. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 8351–8367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yoffe, E. (1951). The moving Griffith crack. Phil. Mag., 42, 739–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zheng, G. and Rice, J. R. (1998). Conditions under which velocity-weakening friction allows a self healing versus a cracklike mode of rupture. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88, 1466–1483.Google Scholar