Achtziger, A. and Gollwitzer, Peter M., “Motivation and Volition in the Course of Action,” in Heckhausen, J. and Heckhausen, H. (eds.), Motivation and Action (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 202–226.Google Scholar

Alfano, Mark, “Ramsifying Virtue Theory,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 124–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alfano, Mark, Character as Moral Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Alfano, Mark, “Identifying and Defending the Hard Core of Virtue Ethics,” Journal of Philosophical Research, 38 (2013), 233–260.Google Scholar

Alfano, Mark, “Expanding the Situationist Challenge to Responsibilist Virtue Epistemology,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 62 (2012), 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angier, Tom, Techne in Aristotle’s Ethics: Crafting the Moral Life (New York: Continuum, 2010).Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, “Virtue, Skill and Vice,” Ethics & Politics, XVII:2 (2015), 94–106.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, Intelligent Virtue (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annas, Julia, “The Phenomenology of Virtue,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7 (2008), 21–34.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, “Virtue Ethics,” in Copp, David (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 515–536.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, “The Structure of Virtue,” in DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda (eds.), Intellectual Virtue (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annas, Julia, “Virtue as a Skill,” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 3:2 (1995), 227–243.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia, The Morality of Happiness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (New York: Viking, 1963).Google Scholar

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics (Grinnell: The Peripatetic Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Badhwar, Neera K., “The Limited Unity of Virtue,” Noûs, 30:3 (1996), 306–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baehr, Jason, “Character Virtues, Epistemic Agency, and Reflective Knowledge,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 74–86.Google Scholar

Baehr, Jason, The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert, “Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency,” Journal of Moral Education, 31:2 (2002), 101–119.Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert, “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3:3 (1999), 193–209.Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert, “Social Cognitive Theory of Personality,” in Pervin, Lawrence A. and John, Oliver P. (eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (New York: The Guilford Press, 1999), 154–196.Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert, “Self-Regulation of Motivation through Anticipatory and Self-Reactive Mechanisms,” in Dienstbier, R. A. (ed.), Perspectives on Motivation: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 38 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1991), 69–164.Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert, “Self-Regulation of Motivation and Action through Internal Standards and Goal Systems,” in Pervin, Lawrence A. (ed.), Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989), 19–85.Google Scholar

Bargh, John, “The Four Horsemen of Automaticity: Awareness, Intention, Efficiency, and Control in Social Cognition,” in Wyer, R. S. and Srull, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 1 (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1994), 1–40.Google Scholar

Barsky, Adam, “Investigating the Effects of Moral Disengagement and Participation on Unethical Work Behavior,” Journal of Business Ethics, 104 (2011), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battaly, Heather, “A Pluralist Theory of Virtue,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 7–21.Google Scholar

Battaly, Heather, “What Is Virtue Epistemology?,” Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (2000) www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Valu/ValuBatt.htmGoogle Scholar

Battaly, Heather, “Epistemic Self-Indulgence,” Metaphilosophy, 41 (2010), 214–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F. and Vohs, Kathleen D., “Self-Regulation [Self-Control],” in Peterson, Christopher and Seligman, Martin (eds.), Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 499–516.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F., Vohs, Kathleen D., and Tice, Dianne M., “The Strength Model of Self-Control,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16:6 (2007), 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benner, Patricia, From Novice to Expert (New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health, 2001).Google Scholar

Bloom, Benjamin, Developing Talent in Young People (New York: Ballantine Books, 1985).Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Paul, The Virtues of Happiness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Paul, Moral Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Paul, “Virtue Epistemology and the Epistemology of Virtue,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60:1 (2000), 23–43.Google Scholar

Brandstätter, Veronika and Jonas, Kai J., “Moral Courage Training Programs as a Means of Overcoming Societal Crises,” in Jonas, Kai J. and Morton, Thomas A. (eds.), Restoring Civil Societies: The Psychology of Intervention and Engagement Following Crisis (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), 265–283.Google Scholar

Brandstätter, Veronika, Jonas, Kai J., Koletzko, Svenja H., and Fischer, Peter, “Self-Regulatory Processes in the Appraisal of Moral Courage Situations,” Social Psychology , 47:4 (2016), 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, Bruce G., Davis, Randall, and Feigenbaum, Edward A., “Expert Systems: A Perspective from Computer Science,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 705–722.Google Scholar

Büttner, Oliver B., Wieber, Frank, Schulz, Anna Maria, Bayer, Ute C., Florack, Arnd, and Gollwitzer, Peter M., “Visual Attention and Goal Pursuit: Deliberative and Implemental Mindsets Affect Breadth of Attention,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40:10 (2014), 1248–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cantor, Nancy, “From Thought to Behavior: ‘Having’ and ‘Doing’ in the Study of Personality and Cognition,” American Psychologist, 45:6 (1990), 735–750.Google Scholar

Carver, Charles S. and Scheier, Michael F., “Self-Regulatory Perspectives on Personality,” in Millon, Theodore and Lerner, Melvin J. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 5: Personality and Social Psychology (Hobokon, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003), 185–208.Google Scholar

Cassam, Quassim, Self-Knowledge for Humans (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Chi, Michelene T. H., “Two Approaches to the Study of Experts’ Characteristics,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christen, Markus and Alfano, Mark, “Outlining the Field: A Research Program for Empirically Informed Ethics,” in Christen, Markus, van Schaik, Carel, Fischer, Johannes, and Huppenbauer, Markus (eds.), Empirically Informed Ethics: Morality between Facts and Norms (Springer, 2014), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, Wayne, Sutton, John, and Mcilwain, Doris J. F., “Cognition in Skilled Action: Meshed Control and the Varieties of Skill Experience,” Mind & Language, 31:1 (2016), 37–66, 49.Google Scholar

Choudhry, N. K., Fletcher, R. H., and Soumerai, S. B., “Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 142 (2005), 260–273.Google Scholar

Cianciolo, Anna T., Matthew, Cynthia, Sternberg, Robert J., and Wagner, Richard K., “Tacit Knowledge, Practical Intelligence, and Expertise,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 613–632.Google Scholar

Conant, Roger C. and Ashby, W. Ross, “Every Good Regulator of a System Must Be a Model of that System,” International Journal of Systems Science, 1:2 (1970), 89–97.Google Scholar

Cramer, Robert Ervin, McMaster, M. Rosalie, Bartell, Patricia A., and Dragna, Margurite, “Subject Competence and Minimization of the Bystander Effect,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18:13 (1988), 1133–1148.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihay, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (New York: HarperCollins, 1991).Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Rathunde, Kevin, and Whalen, Samuel, Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Darley, J. M. and Batson, C. D., “From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27 (1973), 100–108.Google Scholar

Detert, James R., Trevino, Linda Klebe, and Sweitzer, Vicki L, “Moral Disengagement in Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 93 (2008), 374–391.Google Scholar

DeYoung, Colin G., “Cybernetic Big Five Theory,” Journal of Research in Personality, 56 (2015), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, Colin G. and Weisberg, Yanna J., “Cybernetic Approaches to Personality and Social Behavior,” in Snyder, M. and Deaux, K. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, Second Edition, in press (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Diedrichsen, Jorn, Shadmehr, Reza, and Ivry, Richard B., “The Coordination of Movement: Optimal Feedback Control and Beyond,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (2009), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doris, John, Lack of Character (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert, “Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79:2 (2005), 47–65.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert, “Could Anything Be More Intelligible than Everyday Intelligibility? Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the light of Division II,” in Faulconer, James E. and Wrathall, Mark A. (eds.), Appropriating Heidegger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert, What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart, “The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model,” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24:3 (2004), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart, “Sustaining Non-Rationalized Practices: Body-Mind, Power, and Situational Ethics.”Interview conducted by Bent Flyvbjerg, Praxis International, 11 (1991), 93–113.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart, “Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise,” Human Studies, 14 (1991), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart, “What Is Morality: A Phenomenological Account of the Development of Expertise,” in Rasmussen, D. (ed.), Universalism vs. Communitarianism, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990), 237–264.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Hubert and Dreyfus, Stuart, Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar

Duckworth, Angela Lee, Grant, Heidi, Loew, Benjamin, Oettingen, Gabriele and Gollwitzer, Peter M., “Self-Regulation Strategies Improve Self-Discipline in Adolescents: Benefits of Mental Contrasting and Implementation Intentions,” Educational Psychology, 31:1 (2010), 17–26.Google Scholar

Duckworth, Angela and Gross, James J., “Self-Control and Grit: Related but Separable Determinants of Success,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23:5 (2014), 319–325.Google Scholar

Duckworth, Angela Lee and Tsukayama, Eli, “Domain Specificity in Self-Control”, in Miller, Christian B., Furr, R. Michael, Knobel, Angela, and Fleeson, William (eds.) Character: New Directions from Philosophy, Psychology, and Theology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endsley, Mica, “Expertise and Situation Awareness,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 633–651.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders, “Deliberate Practice and Acquisition of Expert Performance: A General Overview,” Academic Emergency Medicine, 15 (2008), 988–994.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders, “An Introduction to Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its Development, Organization, and Content,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders, “Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts’ Performance on Representative Tasks,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders, “The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 683–704.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders, The Road to Excellence (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders, Whyte, J., and Ward, P., “Expert Performance in Nursing: Reviewing Research on Expertise in Nursing Within the Framework of the Expert-Performance Approach,” ANS Advances in Nursing Science, 30 (2007), E58–E71.Google Scholar

Evans, Jonathan and Stanovich, Keith, “Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8:3 (2013), 223–241.Google Scholar

Fairweather, Abrol, “Duhem-Quine Virtue Epistemology,” Synthese, 187 (2012), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feltovich, Paul J. and Barrows, H. S., “Issues of Generality in Medical Problem Solving,” in Schmidt, Henck G. and de Volder, Maurice L. (eds.), Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning (Maaastricht, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1984), 128–142.Google Scholar

Feltovich, Paul J., Prietula, Michael J., and Ericsson, K. Anders, “Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 41–68.Google Scholar

Fishbach, Ayelet and Converse, Benjamin A., “Identifying and Battling Temptation,” in Vohs, Kathleen D. and Baumeister, Roy F. (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications, Second Edition (New York: The Guilford Press), 244–260.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent, “Phronetic Planning Research: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections,” Planning Theory & Practice, 5:3 (2004), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flyvbjerg, Bent, Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Forgas, Joseph P., Dunn, Elizabeth, and Granland, Stacey, “Are You Being Served …? An Unobtrusive Experiment of Affective Influences on Helping in a Department Store,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (2008), 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fossheim, Hallvard J., “Virtue Ethics and Everyday Strategies,” Association Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 267 (2014), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Ellen, “Knowing How: Problems and Considerations,” European Journal of Philosophy, 23:3 (2015), 703–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Ellen, “They’ve Lost Control: Reflections on Skill,” Synthese, 191 (2014), 2729–2750.Google Scholar

Fridland, Ellen, “Skill Learning and Conceptual Thought: Making a Way through the Wilderness,” in Bashour, B. and Muller, H. (eds.), Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications (New York: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Fridland, Ellen, “Problems with Intellectualism,” Philosophical Studies, 165:3 (2013), 879–891.Google Scholar

Fujita, Kentaro, Trope, Yaacov, Cunningham, William A., and Liberman, Nira, “What Is Control? A Conceptual Analysis,” in Sherman, Jeffrey W., Gawronski, Bertram, and Trope, Yaacov, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind (New York: The Guilford Press, 2014), 50–65.Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, Peter M., “Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans,” American Psychologist, 54:7 (1999), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gollwitzer, Peter M., “Action Phases and Mind-Sets,” in Higgins, E. Tory and Sorrentino, Richard M. (eds.), Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2 (New York: The Guilford Press, 1990), 53–92.Google Scholar

Greco, John, Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Haase, Claudia Maria, Poulin, Michael, and Heckhausen, Jutta, “Engagement and Disengagement Across the Life Span: An Analysis of Two-Process Models of Developmental Regulation,” in Greve, W., Rothermund, K., and Wentura, D. (eds.), The Adaptive Self: Personal Continuity and Intentional Self-Development (New York: Hogrefe, 2005), 117–135.Google Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan, “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment,” Psychological Review, 108 (2001), 814–834.Google Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan and Bjorklund, Frederick, “Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions about Moral Psychology,” in Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity (Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2008), 181–218.Google Scholar

Haney, C., Banks, C., and Zimbardo, P., 1973, “A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison,” in Readings about the Social Animal, Aronson, E. (ed.), Third Edition (San Francisco: Freeman), 52–67.Google Scholar

Harman, Gilbert, “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99 (1999), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, Gilbert, The Nature of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hashem, Ahmad, Chi, Michelene T. H., and Friedman, Charles P., “Medical Errors as a Result of Specialization,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36 (2003), 61–69.Google Scholar

Heckhausen, Jutta, “The Motivation–Volition Divide and Its Resolution in Action-Phase Models of Developmental Regulation,” Research in Human Development, 4:3–4 (2007), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, Judith, Trauma and Recovery (New York: Basic Books, 1997).Google Scholar

Hill, Nicole M. and Schneider, Walter, “Brain Changes in the Development of Expertise: Neuroanatomical and Neurophysiological Evidence about Skill-Based Adaptations,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 653–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogarth, Robin M., Educating Intuition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Horgan, Terry and Timmons, Mark, “Morphological Rationalism and the Psychology of Moral Judgment,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10 (2007) 279–295.Google Scholar

Horn, John and Masunaga, Hiromi, “A Merging Theory of Expertise and Intelligence,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 587–612.Google Scholar

Hunt, Earl, “Expertise, Talent, and Social Encouragement,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind, “Virtue Ethics,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2013 Edition, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue/.Google Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind, “Practical Wisdom: A Mundane Account,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106 (2006), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind, On Virtue Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D.S., “Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate Concerning Skills in Fourth-Century Medicine, Rhetoric, and Ethics,” Apeiron, 21 (1988), 17–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Inzlicht, Michael, Berkman, Elliot, and Elkins-Brown, Nathaniel, “The Neuroscience of ‘Ego Depletion’: How the Brain Can Help Us Understand why Self-control Seems Limited,” in Harmon-Jones, Eddie and Inzlicht, Michael (eds.), Social Neuroscience: Biological Approaches to Social Psychology (New York: Routledge, 2016), 101–123.Google Scholar

Isen, A., Clark, M., and Schwartz, M., “Duration of the Effect of Good Mood on Helping: ‘Footprints on the Sands of Time’,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (1976), 385–393.Google Scholar

Isen, A. and Levin, P., “Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (1972), 384–388.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Daniel, “Seeing by Feeling: Virtues, Skills, and Moral Perception,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 8 (2005), 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansson, Anders, “Goal Achievement and Mental Models in Everyday Decision Making,” in Juslin, Peter and Montgomery, Henry (eds.), Judgment and Decision Making: Neo-Brunswikian and Process-Tracing Approaches (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999), 23–43.Google Scholar

Johnson, Robert, “Virtue and Right,” Ethics, 113 (2003), 810–834.Google Scholar

Jourden, Forest J., Bandura, Albert, and Banfield, Jason T., “The Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Factors and Motor Skill,” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 8 (1991), 213–226.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011).Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel and Klein, Gary, “Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree,” American Psychologist, 64:6 (2009), 515–526.Google Scholar

Keren, Gideon and Schul, Yaccov, “Two Is Not Always Better than One: A Critical Evaluation of Two-System Theories,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4 (2009), 533–550.Google Scholar

King, Nathan, “Responsibilist Virtue Epistemology: A Reply to the Situationist Challenge,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 64 (2014), 243–253.Google Scholar

Kirkeby, Inge, “Transferable Knowledge: An Interview with Bent Flyvbjerg,” Architectural Research Quarterly, 15:1 (2011), 9–14.Google Scholar

Klein, Gary A. and Hoffman, Robert R., “Seeing the Invisible: Perceptual-Cognitive Aspects of Expertise,” in Rabinowitz, Mitchell (ed.), Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993).Google Scholar

Krampe, Ralf and Charness, Neil, “Aging and Expertise,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaBarge, Scott, “Socrates and Moral Expertise,” in Rasmussen, Lisa. M. (ed.), Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives, and Applications (The Netherlands: Springer, 2005), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapsley, Daniel and Hill, Patrick, “On Dual Processing and Heuristic Approaches to Moral Cognition,” Journal of Moral Education, 37:3 (2008), 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lapsley, Daniel and Narvaez, Darcia, “A Social-Cognitive Approach to the Moral Personality,” in Lapsley, Daniel K. and Narvaez, Darcia (eds.), Moral Development, Self and Identity: Essays in Honor of Augusto Blasi (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latané, Bibb and Darley, John M., The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help? (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970,).Google Scholar

Loehr, James E., The Mental Game (New York: Plume, 1991).Google Scholar

Ludwig, Timothy D. and Geller, E. Scott, “Assigned versus Participatory Goal Setting and Response Generalization,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (1997), 253–261.Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven, “Comment: Do People Have Character Traits?,” in Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 291–298.Google Scholar

Mathews, K. E. and Cannon, L. K., “Environmental Noise Level as a Determinant of Helping Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (1975), 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, John, “Virtue and Reason,” The Monist, 62:3 (1979), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mele, Alfred R. and Shepherd, Joshua, “Situationism and Agency,” Journal of Practical Ethics, 1 (2014), 62–83.Google Scholar

Merritt, Maria W., Doris, John M., and Harman, Gilbert, “Character,” in Doris, John Michael (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook (Oxford University Press, 2010), 355–401.Google Scholar

Milgram, Stanley, Obedience to Authority (New York: Harper and Row, 1974)Google Scholar

Miller, Christian, “Character and Situationism: New Directions,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20:3 (2017), 459–471.Google Scholar

Miller, Christian B., “Honesty,” in Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter and Miller, Christian B. (eds.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 5: Virtue and Character (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2017), 237–273.Google Scholar

Miller, Christian B., “Russell on Acquiring Virtue,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 106–117.Google Scholar

Miller, Christian, Character and Moral Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Christian, “The Problem of Character,” in Van Hooft, Stan (ed.), The Handbook of Virtue Ethics (New York: Routledge, 2014), 418–429.Google Scholar

Miller, Christian, Moral Character: An Empirical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Miscevic, Nenad. “Virtue-Based Epistemology and the Centrality of Truth (Towards a Strong Virtue Epistemology),” Acta Analytica, 22 (2007), 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mischel, W. and Shoda, Y.. “A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing Situations, Dispositions, Dynamics, and Invariance in Personality Structure,” Psychological Review, 102 (1995), 246–268.Google Scholar

Montmarquet, James, “Ramsify (by All Means) – but Do Not ‘Dumb Down’ the Moral Virtues,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 136–146.Google Scholar

Moore, Celia, “Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption,” Journal of Business Ethics, 80 (2008), 129–139.Google Scholar

Moskowitz, Gordon B., “The Implicit Volition Model: The Unconscious Nature of Goal Pursuit,” in Sherman, Jeffrey W., Gawronski, Bertram, and Trope, Yaacov, Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind (New York: The Guilford Press, 2014), 400–422.Google Scholar

Moskowitz, Gordon B., Gollwitzer, Peter M., Wasel, Wolfgang, and Schaal, Bernd, “Preconscious Control of Stereotype Activation through Chronic Egalitarian Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 1 (1999), 167–184.Google Scholar

Nakamura, Jeanne and Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, “The Concept of Flow,” in Snyder, C. R. and Lopez, S. J. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 89–105.Google Scholar

Narvaez, Darcia, “Wisdom as Mature Moral Functioning: Insights from Developmental Psychology and Neurobiology,” in Jones, Mark, Lewis, Paul, and Reffitt, Kelly (eds.), Toward Human Flourishing: Character, Practical Wisdom and Professional Formation (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Narvaez, Darcia, “De neurobiology van ons morel functioneren [The neurobiology of moral formation and moral functioning]” Pastorale Perspectieven, 153:4 (2011), 10–18.Google Scholar

Narvaez, Darcia, “Integrative Ethical Education,” in Killen, Melanie and Smetana, Judith (eds.), Handbook of Moral Development (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006), 703–733.Google Scholar

Narvaez, Darcia, “The Neo-Kohlbergian Tradition and Beyond: Schemas, Expertise and Character,” in Carlo, Gustav and Pope-Edwards, Carolyn (eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 51: Moral Motivation through the Lifespan (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2005), 119–163.Google Scholar

Narvaez, Darcia, Gleason, Tracy and Mitchell, Christyan, “Moral Virtue and Practical Wisdom: Theme Comprehension in Children, Youth and Adults,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, 171:4 (2010), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Narvaez, Darcia and Lapsley, Daniel, “The Psychological Foundations of Everyday Morality and Moral Expertise,” in Lapsley, Daniel K. and Power, F. Clark (eds.) Character Psychology and Character Education (Notre Dame: IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005), 140–165.Google Scholar

Olin, Lauren and Doris, John M., “Vicious Minds: Virtue Epistemology, Cognition, and Skepticism,” Philosophical Studies, 168 (2014), 665–692.Google Scholar

Parry, Richard, “Episteme and Techne,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/episteme-techne.Google Scholar

Plant, E. Ashby, Peruche, B. Michelle, and Butz, David A., “Eliminating Automatic Racial Bias: Making Race Non-Diagnostic for Responses to Criminal Suspects,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41 (2005), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pritchard, Duncan, “Virtue Epistemology and the Acquisition of Knowledge,” Philosophical Explorations, 8:3 (2005), 229–243.Google Scholar

Railton, Peter, “Social Skill and Empathetic Modelling,” Presented at Virtue and Skill Workshop, Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature, University of Oslo, Norway (June 1–2, 2015).Google Scholar

Railton, Peter, “The Affective Dog and Its Rational Tale: Intuition and Attunement,” Ethics, 124 (2014), 813–859.Google Scholar

Roberts, Bob, “Will Power and the Virtues,” The Philosophical Review, 93:2 (1984), 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, Karol, Shafer, Jennifer, and Klein, Gary, “Professional Judgments and “Naturalistic Decision Making,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, William B. and Morris, Nancy M, “On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models” (No. DTIC #AD-A159080). (Atlanta, GA: Center for Man-Machine Systems Research, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1985).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Origin of Inequality, Cole, GDH (trans), (London: Cosmo Classics, 2005).Google Scholar

Russell, Daniel C., “From Personality to Character to Virtue,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 92–105.Google Scholar

Russell, Daniel C., Practical Intelligence and the Virtues (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind, (New York: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert, “On Forgetting the Difference between Right and Wrong,” in Melden, A. I. (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958).Google Scholar

Sabini, John and Silver, Maury, “Lack of Character? Situationism Critiqued,” Ethics, 115: 3 (2005), 535–562.Google Scholar

Seligman, Martin E. P., Railton, Peter, Baumeister, Roy F., and Sripada, Chandra, “Navigating into the Future or Driven by the Past,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8:2 (2013), 119–141.Google Scholar

Snow, Nancy E., “Virtue and Oppression,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 49–58.Google Scholar

Snow, Nancy E., Virtue as Social Intelligence: An Empirically Grounded Theory (New York: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

Snow, Nancy E., “Habitual Virtuous Actions and Automaticity,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 9 (2006), 545–561.Google Scholar

Sosa, Ernest, “Virtue Epistemology: Character versus Competence,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (Routledge, 2015), 62–74.Google Scholar

Sosa, Ernest, “Situations against Virtues: The Situationist Attack on Virtue Theory,” in Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 274–290.Google Scholar

Sosa, Ernest, A Virtue Epistemology: Apt Belief and Reflective Knowledge, Vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Aaron, “Virtue as Mastery in Early Confucianism,” Journal of Religious Ethics 38:3 (2010), 404–428.Google Scholar

Stanley, Jason, Know How (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy, “Knowing How,” Journal of Philosophy, 98:8 (2001), 414–444.Google Scholar

Steutel, Jan, “The Virtues of Will-Power: Self-Control and Deliberation,” in Carr, David and Steutel, Jan (eds.), Virtue Ethics and Moral Education (London and New York, Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Stichter, Matt, “Practical Skills and Practical Wisdom in Virtue,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94:3 (2016): 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stichter, Matt, “Philosophical and Psychological Accounts of Expertise and Experts,” Humana.Mente – Journal of Philosophical Studies, 28: Experts and Expertise. Interdisciplinary Issues (2015).Google Scholar

Stichter, Matt, “Virtues as Skills in Virtue Epistemology,” Journal of Philosophical Research, 38 (2013), 331–346.Google Scholar

Stichter, Matt, “Virtues, Skills, and Right Action,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 14 (2011): 73–86.Google Scholar

Stichter, Matt, “Ethical Expertise,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10 (2007), 183–194.Google Scholar

Stichter, Matt, “The Skill Model of Virtue,” Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 14 (2007): 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swartwood, Jason, “Wisdom as an Expert Skill,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16 (2013), 511–528.Google Scholar

Sylvan, Kurt, “Veritism Unswamped,” Mind, fzw070, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw07. Published 28 July 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanner, Carmen and Christen, Markus, “Moral Intelligence – A Framework for Understanding Moral Competences,” in Christen, Markus, van Schaik, Carel, Fischer, Johannes, and Huppenbauer, Markus (eds.), Empirically Informed Ethics: Morality between Facts and Norms (Switzerland: Springer, 2014), 119–136.Google Scholar

Tanner, Carmen and Medin, Douglas L., “Protected Values: No Omission Bias and No framing Effects,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11:1 (2004), 185–191.Google Scholar

Tanney, Julia, “Rethinking Ryle: A Critical Discussion of the Concept of Mind,” in Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind, (New York: Routledge, 2009), xxviii.Google Scholar

Tenbrunsel, Ann E., and Messick, David M., “Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior,” Social Justice Research, 17:2 (2004), 223–236.Google Scholar

Thornberg, Robert and Jungert, Tomas, “Bystander Behavior in Bullying Situations: Basic Moral Sensitivity, Moral Disengagement and Defender Self-Efficacy,” Journal of Adolescence, 36:3 (2013), 475–483.Google Scholar

Tiberius, Valerie, “In Defense of Reflection,” Philosophical Issues, 23: Epistemic Agency (2013), 223–243.Google Scholar

Tiberius, Valerie and Swartwood, Jason, “Wisdom Revisited: A Case Study in Normative Theorizing,” Philosophical Explorations, 14:3 (2011), 277–295.Google Scholar

Trope, Yaacov and Liberman, Nira, “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance,” Psychological Review, 117:2 (2010), 440–463.Google Scholar

Trötschel, Roman and Gollwitzer, Peter M., “Implementation Intentions and the Willful Pursuit of Prosocial Goals in Negotiations,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43 (2007), 579–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel, “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science, 211:30 (1981), 453–457.Google Scholar

Van Zyl, Liezl, “Against Radical Pluralism,” in Alfano, Mark (ed.), Current Controversies in Virtue Theory (New York: Routledge, 2015), 22–32.Google Scholar

Voss, James F. and Wiley, Jennifer, “Expertise in History,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 569–586.Google Scholar

Wallace, James, Virtues and Vices (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Watson, Gary, “Two Faces of Responsibility,” in Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webb, Thomas L. and Sheeran, Paschal, “Does Changing Behavioral Intentions Engender Behavior Change? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence,” Psychological Bulletin, 132: 2 (2006), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinstein, Bruce D., “The Possibility of Ethical Expertise,” Theoretical Medicine 15 (1994), 61–75.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred North, An Introduction to Mathematics (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911).Google Scholar

Wieber, Frank, Gollwitzer, Peter M., and Sheeran, Paschal, “Strategic Regulation of Mimicry Effects by Implementation Intentions,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53 (2014), 31–39.Google Scholar

Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., and LaFleur, S. J., “Introspecting about Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19 (1993), 331–359.Google Scholar

Wilson, T. D. and Schooler, J. W., “Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decision,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (1991), 181–192.Google Scholar

Wolf, Susan, “Moral Psychology and the Unity of the Virtues,” Ratio, 20:2 (2007), 145–167.Google Scholar

Wu, Wayne, “Mental Action and the Threat of Automaticity,” in Clark, Andy, Kiverstein, Julian and Vierkant, Tillman (eds.), Decomposing the Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yarrow, Kielan, Brown, Peter and Krakauer, John W., “Inside the Brain of an Elite Athlete: the Neural Processes that Support High Achievement in Sports,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10:8 (2009), 585–596.Google Scholar

Zagzebski, Linda, Virtues of the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, Barry J., “Development and Adaptation of Expertise: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs,” in Ericsson, K. Anders (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmerman, Barry J., “Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective,” in Boekaerts, Monique, Pintrich, Paul R., and Zeidner, Moshe (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (San Diego: Academic Press, 2000), 13–39.Google Scholar

Zsambok, Caroline E., “Naturalistic Decision Making – Where Are We Now?,” in Zsambok, Caroline E. and Klein, Gary (eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making (New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1997), 17–28.Google Scholar