Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T21:04:23.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 14 - Cystic and Developmental Diseases of the Kidney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2017

By
Xin Jin (Joseph) Zhou  and
Ramesh Saxena
Edited by
Xin Jin (Joseph) Zhou ,
Zoltan G. Laszik ,
Tibor Nadasdy  and
Vivette D. D'Agati
Xin Jin (Joseph) Zhou
Affiliation:
Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas
Zoltan G. Laszik
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Tibor Nadasdy
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Vivette D. D'Agati
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Silva's Diagnostic Renal Pathology , pp. 521 - 551
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Loftus, H, Ong, AC. Cystic kidney diseases: many ways to form a cyst. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013;28:33–49.Google Scholar
Eknoyan, GA. Clinical view of simple and complex renal cysts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1874–6.Google Scholar
Harris, PC, Torres, VE. Genetic mechanisms and signaling pathways in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseases. J Clin Invest 2014; 124:2315–24.Google Scholar
Weber, S, Moriniere, V, Knuppel, T, et al. Prevalence of mutations in renal developmental genes in children with renal hypodysplasia: results of the ESCAPE study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17:2864–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, KM. The role of cilia in the pathogenesis of cystic kidney disease? Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015; 27:212–8.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, F, Benzing, T, Katsanis, N. Ciliopathies. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1533–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newby, LJ, Streets, AJ, Zhao, Y, et al. Identification, characterization, and localization of a novel kidney polycystin-1–polycystin-2 complex. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277:20763–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hateboer, N, v Dijk, MA, Bogdanova, N, et al. Comparison of phenotypes of polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2. European PKD1–PKD2 Study Group. Lancet. 1999; 353:103–7.Google Scholar
Grantham, JJ, Torres, VE, Chapman, AB, et al. Volume progression in polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:2122–30.Google Scholar
Grantham, JJ, Cook, LT, Torres, VE, et al. Determinants of renal volume in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2008; 73:108–16.Google Scholar
Fick-Brosnahan, GM, Tran, ZV, Johnson, AM, et al. Progression of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease in children. Kidney Int. 2001; 59:1654–62.Google Scholar
Shamshirsaz, A, Bekheirnia, R, Kamgar, M, et al. Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease in infancy and childhood: progression and outcome. Kidney Int. 2005; 68:2218–24.Google Scholar
Mehler, K, Beck, BB, Kaul, I, et al. Respiratory and general outcome in neonates with renal oligohydramnios – a single centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26:3514–22.Google Scholar
Brook-Carter, PT, Peral, B, Ward, CJ, et al. Deletion of the TSC2 and PKD1 genes associated with severe infantile polycystic kidney disease – a contiguous gene syndrome. Nat Genet. 1994; 8:328–32.Google Scholar
Cobben, JM, Breuning, MH, Schoots, C, ten Kate, LP, Zerres, K. Congenital hepatic fibrosis in autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 1990; 38:880–5.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J, Evan, AP, Gardner, KD Jr. Epithelial hyperplasia in human polycystic kidney diseases. Its role in pathogenesis and risk of neoplasia. Am J Pathol. 1987; 129:92–101.Google Scholar
Gregoire, JR, Torres, VE, Holley, KE, Farrow, GM. Renal epithelial hyperplastic and neoplastic proliferation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1987; 9:27–38.Google Scholar
Keith, DS, Torres, VE, King, BF, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994; 4:1661–9.Google Scholar
Bisceglia, M, Creti, G. AMR series unilateral (localized) renal cystic disease. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005; 12:227–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nauli, SM, Zhou, J. Polycystins and mechanosensation in renal and nodal cilia. Bioessays. 2004; 26:844–56.Google Scholar
Patel, A, Honoré, E. Polycystins and renovascular mechanosensory transduction. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010; 6:530–8.Google Scholar
Nauli, SM, Rossetti, S, Kolb, RJ, et al. Loss of polycystin-1 in human cyst-lining epithelia leads to ciliary dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17:1015–25.Google Scholar
Fain, PR, McFann, KK, Taylor, MR, et al. Modifier genes play a significant role in the phenotypic expression of PKD1. Kidney Int. 2005; 67:1256–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torres, VE, Chapman, AB, Devuyst, O, et al. Tolvaptan in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367:2407–18.Google Scholar
Takiar, V, Nishio, S, Seo-Mayer, P, et al. Activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) slows renal cystogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 106:2462–7.Google Scholar
McCarty, MF, Barroso-Aranda, J, Contreras, F. Activation of AMP-activated kinase as a strategy for managing autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Med Hypoth. 2009; 73:1008–10.Google Scholar
Walz, G, Budde, K, Mannaa, M, et al. Everolimus in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:830–40.Google Scholar
Serra, AL, Poster, D, Kistler, AD, et al. Sirolimus and kidney growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. New Engl J Med. 2010; 363:820–9.Google Scholar
Cornec-Le Gall, E, Audrezet, M-P, Rousseau, A, et al. The PROPKD score: a new algorithm to predict renal survival in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016; 27:942–51.Google Scholar
Schrier, RW, Abebe, KZ, Perrone, RD, et al. Blood pressure in early autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:2255–66.Google Scholar
Torres, VE, Abebe, KZ, Chapman, AB, et al. Angiotensin blockade in late autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:2267–76.Google Scholar
Bergmann, C, Senderek, J, Kupper, F, et al. PKHD1 mutations in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). Hum Mutat. 2004; 23:453–63.Google Scholar
Bergmann, C, Senderek, J, Windelen, E, et al. Clinical consequences of PKHD1 mutations in 164 patients with autosomal-recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). Kidney Int. 2005; 67:829–48.Google Scholar
Adeva, M, El-Youssef, M, Rossetti, S, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization define a broadened spectrum of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). Medicine (Baltimore), 2006; 85:1–21.Google Scholar
LIapis, H, Winyard, P. Cystic diseases and developmental defects. In Jennette, JL, D’Agati, V, Olson, JL, Silva, FG (eds), Heptinstall’s Pathology of the Kidney, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2014; 119.Google Scholar
Lieberman, E, Salinas-Madrigal, L, Gwinn, JL, et al. Infantile polycystic disease of the kidneys and liver: clinical, pathological and radiological correlations and comparison with congenital hepatic fibrosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1971; 50:277–318.Google Scholar
Blickman, JG, Bramson, RT, Herrin, JT. Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: long-term sonographic findings in patients surviving the neonatal period. Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 164:1247–50.Google Scholar
Johnson, CA, Gissen, P, Sergi, C. Molecular pathology and genetics of congenital hepatorenal fibrocystic syndromes. J Med Genet. 2003; 40:311–9.Google Scholar
Sweeney, WE Jr,Avner, ED. Molecular and cellular pathophysiology of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD). Cell Tissue Res. 2006; 326:671–85.Google Scholar
Menezes, LF, Cai, Y, Nagasawa, Y, et al. Polyductin, the PKHD1 gene product, comprises isoforms expressed in plasma membrane, primary cilium, and cytoplasm. Kidney Int. 2004; 66:1345–55.Google Scholar
Bergmann, C. ARPKD and early manifestation of ADPKD: the original polycystic kidney disease and phenotypes. Pediat Nephrol. 2015; 30:15–30.Google Scholar
Guay-Woodford, LM, Bissler, JJ, Braun, MC, et al. Consensus expert recommendation for the diagnosis and management of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease: report of an international conference. J Pediatr. 2014; 165:611–7.Google Scholar
Wolf, MT, Hildebrandt, F. Nephronophthisis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011; 26:181–94.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, F, Zhou, W. Nephronophthisis-associated ciliopathies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18:1855–71.Google Scholar
Gagnadoux, MF, Bacri, JL, Broyer, M, Habib, R. Infantile chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis with cortical microcysts: variant of nephronophthisis or new disease entity? Ped Nephrol. 1989; 3:50–55.Google Scholar
Benzing, T, Schermer, B. Clinical spectrum and pathogenesis of nephronophthisis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012; 21:272–8.Google Scholar
Omran, H, Fernandez, C, Jung, M, et al. Identification of a new gene locus for adolescent nephronophthisis, on chromosome 3q22 in a large Venezuelan pedigree. Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 66: 118–27.Google Scholar
Kumada, S, Hayashi, M, Arima, K, et al. Renal disease in Arima syndrome is nephronophthisis as in other Joubert-related Cerebello-oculo-renal syndromes. Am J Med Genet A. 2004; 131: 71–6.Google Scholar
Otto, EA, Schermer, B, Obara, T, et al. Mutations in INVS encoding inversin cause nephronophthisis type 2, linking renal cystic disease to the function of primary cilia and left-right axis determination. Nat Genet. 2003; 34:413–20.Google Scholar
Waldherr, R, Lennert, T, Weber, HP, et al. The nephronophthisis complex. A clinicopathologic study in children. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1982; 394:235–54.Google Scholar
Witzleben, CL, Sharp, AR. “Nephronophthisis–congenital hepatic fibrosis”: an additional hepatorenal disorder. Hum Pathol. 1982; 13:728–33.Google Scholar
Failler, M, Gee, HY, Krug, P, et al Mutations of CEP83 cause infantile nephronophthisis and intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2014; 94:905–14.Google Scholar
Taskiran, EZ, Korkmaz, E, Gucer, S, et al. Mutations in ANKS6 cause a nephronophthisis-like phenotype with ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 25:1653–61.Google Scholar
Halbritter, J, Porath, JD, Diaz, KA, et al. Identification of 99 novel mutations in a worldwide cohort of 1,056 patients with a nephronophthisis-related ciliopathy. Hum Genet. 2013; 132:865–84.Google Scholar
Hurd, TW, Hildebrandt, F. Mechanisms of nephronophthisis and related ciliopathies. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2011; 118:e9–e14.Google Scholar
O’Toole, JF, Otto, EA, Hoefele, J, et al. Mutational analysis in 119 families with nephronophthisis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007; 22:366–70.Google Scholar
Parisi, MA, Doherty, M, Eckert, ML, et al. AHI1 mutations cause both retinal dystrophy and renal cystic disease in Joubert syndrome. J Med Genet. 2006; 43:334–9.Google Scholar
Stoetzel, C, Muller, J, Laurier, V, et al. Identification of a novel BBS gene (BBS12) highlights the major role of a vertebrate-specific branch of chaperonin-related proteins in Bardet–Biedl syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80:1–11.Google Scholar
Eckardt, KU, Alper, SL, Antignac, C, et al. Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease: diagnosis, classification, and management – a KDIGO consensus report. Kidney Int. 2015; 88:676–83.Google Scholar
Venkat-Raman, G, Gast, C, Marinaki, A, Fairbanks, L. From juvenile hyperuricaemia to dysfunctional uromodulin: an ongong metamorphosis. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016. Doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3308-y.Google Scholar
Ekici, AB, Hackenbeck, T, Morinière, V, et al. Renal fibrosis is the common feature of autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney diseases caused by mutations in mucin 1 or uromodulin. Kidney Int. 2014; 86:589–99.Google Scholar
Bleyer, AJ, Kmoch, S, Antignac, C, et al. Variable clinical presentation of an MUC1 mutation causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 9:527–35.Google Scholar
Dahan, K, Devuyst, O, Smaers, M, et al. A cluster of mutations in the UMOD gene causes familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy with abnormal expression of uromodulin. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14:2883–93.Google Scholar
Kirby, A, Gnirke, A, Jaffe, DB, et al. Mutations causing medullary cystic kidney disease type 1 lie in a large VNTR in MUC1 missed by massively parallel sequencing. Nat Genet. 2013; 45:299–303Google Scholar
Wolf, MT, Mucha, BE, Hennies, HC, et al. Medullary cystic kidney disease type 1: mutational analysis in 37 genes based on haplotype sharing. Hum Genet. 2006; 119: 649–58.Google Scholar
Wolf, MT, Beck, BB, Zaucke, F, et al. The Uromodulin C744G mutation causes MCKD2 and FJHN in children and adults and may be due to a possible founder effect. Kidney Int. 2007; 71:574–81.Google Scholar
Hodanova, K, Majewski, J, Kublova, M, et al. Mapping of a new candidate locus for uromodulin-associated kidney disease (UAKD) to chromosome 1q41. Kidney Int. 2005; 68:1472–82.Google Scholar
Bernascone, I, Vavassori, S, Di Pentima, A, et al. Defective intracellular trafficking of uromodulin mutant isoforms. Traffic. 2006; 7:1567–79.Google Scholar
Zivna, M, Hulkova, H, Matignon, M, et al. Dominant renin gene mutations associated with early-onset hyperuricemia, anemia, and chronic kidney failure. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 85:204–13.Google Scholar
Bleyer, AJ, Zivná, M, Kmoch, S. Uromodulin-associated kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011; 118:c31–6.Google Scholar
Fabris, A, Anglani, F, Lupo, A, Gambaro, G. Medullary sponge kidney: state of the art. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28:1111–9.Google Scholar
Indridason, OS, Thomas, L, Berkoben, M. Medullary sponge kidney associated with congenital hemihypertrophy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996; 7: 1123–30.Google Scholar
Maw, AM, Megibow, AJ, Grasso, M, Goldfarb, DS. Diagnosis of medullary sponge kidney by computed tomographic urography. Am J Kid Dis. 2007; 50:146–50.Google Scholar
Evan, AP, Worcester, EM, Williams, JC Jr, et al. Biopsy proven medullary sponge kidney: clinical findings, histopathology, and role of osteogenesis in stone and plaque formation. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015; 298:865–77.Google Scholar
McPhail, EF, Gettman, MT, Patterson, DE, Rangel, LJ, Krambeck, AE. Nephrolithiasis in medullary sponge kidney: evaluation of clinical and metabolic features. Urology. 2012; 79:277–81.Google Scholar
Gambaro, G, Feltrin, GP, Lupo, A, et al. Medullary sponge kidney (Lenarduzzi–Cacchi–Ricci disease): a Padua Medical School discovery in the 1930s. Kidney Int. 2006; 69:663–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesney, RW, Kaufman, R, Stapleton, FB, Rivas, ML. Association of medullary sponge kidney and medullary dysplasia in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. J Pediatr. 1989; 115:761–4.Google Scholar
Lennerz, JK, Spence, DC, Iskandar, SS, et al. Glomeruocystic kidney – one hundred-year perspective. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010; 134:583–605.Google Scholar
Edghill, EL, Bingham, C, Ellard, S, Hattersley, AT. Mutations in hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta and their related phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2006; 43:84–90.Google Scholar
Ulinski, T, Lescure, S, Beaufils, S, et al. Renal phenotypes related to hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta (TCF2) mutations in a pediatric cohort. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17:497–503.Google Scholar
Decramer, S, Parant, O, Beaufils, S, et al. Anomalies of the TCF2 gene are the main cause of fetal bilateral hyperechogenic kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18:923–33.Google Scholar
Bingham, C, Ellard, S, Cole, TR, et al. Solitary functioning kidney and diverse genital tract malformations associated with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta mutations. Kidney Int. 2002; 61:1243–51.Google Scholar
Bellanne-Chantelot, C, Chauveau, D, Gautier, JF, et al. Clinical spectrum associated with hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta mutations. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140:510–7.Google Scholar
Feather, SA, Winyard, PJ, Dodd, S, Woolf, AS. Oral–facial–digital syndrome type 1 is another dominant polycystic kidney disease: clinical, radiological and histopathological features of a new kindred. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1997; 12:1354–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narayanan, V. Tuberous sclerosis complex: genetics to pathogenesis. Pediatr Neurol. 2003; 29:404–9.Google Scholar
Crino, PB, Nathanson, KL, Henske, EP. The tuberous sclerosis complex. New Engl J Med. 2006; 355:1345–56.Google Scholar
Bisceglia, M, Galliani, CA, Senger, C, et al, Renal cystic diseases: a review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006; 13:26–56.Google Scholar
Dabora, SL, Jozwiak, S, Franz, DN, et al. Mutational analysis in a cohort of 224 tuberous sclerosis patients indicates increased severity of TSC2, compared with TSC1, disease in multiple organs. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 68:64–80.Google Scholar
Rakowski, SK, Winterkorn, EB, Paul, E, et al. Renal manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex: incidence, prognosis, and predictive factors. Kidney Int. 2006; 70:1777–82.Google Scholar
Siroky, BJ, Yin, H, Bissler, JJ. Clinical and molecular insights into tuberous sclerosis complex renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011; 26:839–52.Google Scholar
Martignoni, G, Bonetti, F, Pea, M, et al. Renal disease in adults with TSC2/PKD1 contiguous gene syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26:198–205.Google Scholar
Kleymenova, E, Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O, Kugoh, H, et al. Tuberin-dependent membrane localization of polycystin-1: a functional link between polycystic kidney disease and the TSC2 tumor suppressor gene. Mol Cell. 2001; 7:823–32.Google Scholar
Pan, D, Dong, J, Zhang, Y, Gao, X. Tuberous sclerosis complex: from Drosophila to human disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2004; 14:78–85.Google Scholar
Tiberio, D, Franz, DN, Phillips, JR. Regression of a cardiac rhabdomyoma in a patient receiving everolimus. Pediatrics. 2011; 127:e1335–7.Google Scholar
Budde, K, Gaedeke, J. Tuberous sclerosis complex-associated angiomyolipomas: focus on mTOR inhibition. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 59:276–83.Google Scholar
Robinson, CM, Ohh, M. The multifaceted von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor protein. FEBS Lett. 2014; 588:2704–11.Google Scholar
Lonser, RR, Wait, SD, Butman, JA, et al. Surgical management of lumbosacral nerve root hemangioblastomas in von Hippel–Lindau syndrome. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99:64–69.Google Scholar
Truong, LD, Choi, YJ, Shen, SS, et al. Renal cystic neoplasms and renal neoplasms associated with cystic renal diseases: pathogenetic and molecular links. Adv Anat Pathol. 2003; 10:135–59.Google Scholar
Chatha, RK, Johnson, AM, Rothberg, PG, et al. Von Hippel–Lindau disease masquerading as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37:852–8.Google Scholar
Paraf, F, Chauveau, D, Chretien, Y, et al. Renal lesions in von Hippel–Lindau disease: immunohistochemical expression of nephron differentiation molecules, adhesion molecules and apoptosis proteins. Histopathology. 2000; 36 :457–65.Google Scholar
Schermer, B, Ghenoiu, C, Bartram, M, et al. The von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor protein controls ciliogenesis by orienting microtubule growth. J Cell Biol. 2006; 175:547–54.Google Scholar
Thoma, CR, Frew, IJ, Hoerner, CR, et al. pVHL and GSK3beta are components of a primary cilium‐maintenance signalling network. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9:588–95.Google Scholar
Muller, RU, Fabretti, F, Zank, S, et al. The von Hippel Lindau tumor suppressor limits longevity. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20:2513–7.Google Scholar
Caruana, G, Bertram, JF. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract genetics in mice and men. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015; 20:309–11.Google Scholar
Bonsib, SM. The classification of renal cystic diseases and other congenital malformations of the kidney and urinary tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010; 134:554–68.Google Scholar
Sase, M, Tsukahara, M, Oga, A, et al. Diffuse cystic renal dysplasia: nonsyndromal familial case. Am J Med Genet. 1996; 63:332–4.Google Scholar
Rottenberg, GT, Gordon, I, De Bruyn, R. The natural history of the multicystic dysplastic kidney in children. Br J Radiol. 1997; 70:347–50.Google Scholar
Hiraoka, M, Tsukahara, H, Ohshima, Y, et al. Renal aplasia is the predominant cause of congenital solitary kidneys. Kidney Int. 2002; 61:1840–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, E, Carey, J, Kramer, A, et al. Dominantly inherited renal adysplasia. Am J Med Genet. 1987; 26:863–72.Google Scholar
Narchi, H. Risk of Wilms’ tumour with multicystic kidney disease: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90:147–9.Google Scholar
Salomon, R, Tellier, AL, Attie-Bitach, T, et al. PAX2 mutations in oligomeganephronia. Kidney Int. 2001; 59:457–62.Google Scholar
Suzuki, H, Tokuriki, T, Kamita, H, et al. Age-related pathophysiological changes in rat oligomeganephronic hypoplastic kidney. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006; 21:637–42.Google Scholar
Luyckx, VA, Bertram, JF, Brenner, BM, et al. Effect of fetal and child health on kidney development and long-term risk of hypertension and kidney disease. Lancet. 2013; 382:273–83.Google Scholar
Shindo, S, Bernstein, J, Arant, BS Jr. Evolution of renal segmental atrophy (Ask–Upmark kidney) in children with vesicoureteric reflux: radiographic and morphologic studies. J Pediatr. 1983; 102:847–54.Google Scholar
Pope, JC 4th, Brock, JW 3rd, Adams, MC, Stephens, FD, Ichikawa, I. How they begin and how they end: classic and new theories for the development and deterioration of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, CAKUT. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10:2018–28.Google Scholar
Blake, J, Rosenblum, ND. Renal branching morphogenesis: morphogenetic and signaling mechanisms. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014; 36:2–12.Google Scholar
Thomas, JC, DeMarco, RT, Pope, JC, 4th. Molecular biology of ureteral bud and trigonal development. Curr Urol Rep. 2005; 6:146–51.Google Scholar
Vivante, A, Hwang, D, Kohl, S, et al. Exome sequencing discerns syndromes in patients from consanguineous families with congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016. Doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015080962.Google Scholar
Hwang, DW, Dworschak, GC, Kohl, S, et al. Mutations in 12 known dominant disease-causing genes clarify many congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Kidney Int. 2014; 85:1429–33.Google Scholar
Dziarmaga, A, Quinlan, J, Goodyer, P. Renal hypoplasia: lessons from Pax2. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006; 21:26–31.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J, Hu, M, Berman, Y, et al. Multicystic dysplastic kidney and variable phenotype in a family with a novel deletion mutation of PAX2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16:2754–61.Google Scholar
Bower, M, Salomon, R, Allanson, J, et al. Update of PAX2 mutations in renal coloboma syndrome and establishment of a locus specific database. Hum Mutat. 2012; 33:457–66.Google Scholar
Jenkins, D, Bitner-Glindzicz, M, Malcolm, S, et al. De novo Uroplakin IIIa heterozygous mutations cause human renal adysplasia leading to severe kidney failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16:2141–9.Google Scholar
Smith, UM, Consugar, M, Tee, LJ, et al. The transmembrane protein meckelin (MKS3) is mutated in Meckel–Gruber syndrome and the wpk rat. Nat Genet. 2006; 38:191–6.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H, Pringle, KC, Zuccolo, J, et al. The pathogenesis of dysplastic kidney in a urinary tract obstruction in the female fetal lamb. J Pediatr Surg. 1999; 34:1678–83.Google Scholar
Gribouval, O, Gonzales, M, Neuhaus, T, et al. Mutations in genes in the renin angiotensin system are associated with autosomal recessive renal tubular dysgenesis. Nat Genet. 2005; 37:964–8.Google Scholar
Nicolaou, N, Renkema, KY, Bongers, EMHF, Giles, RH, Knoers, NVAM. Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015; 11:720–31.Google Scholar
Westland, R, Verbitsky, M, Vukojevic, K, et al. Copy number variation analysis identifies novel CAKUT candidate genes in children with a solitary functioning kidney. Kidney Int. 2015; 88:1402–10.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×