Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:38:04.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - How Much Does the Family Want to Be Involved in Decision-Making?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2021

Matthew N. Jaffa
Affiliation:
Hartford Hospital, Connecticut
David Y. Hwang
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

As advancements in medical therapy improve survival, we are confronted with more patients who either cannot communicate or lack decisional capacity, leaving a more common dependency on collaborations with surrogate decision makers. Accompanying these advancements also come radically more complex scenarios to consider that require us to occasionally compromise between quality of life and longevity of life. For instance, modalities such as continuous renal replacement therapy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, left ventricular assist devices, and organ transplantation can certainly extend the lives of their recipients, but at a cost of potential complications, time in the hospital, and variable success. Further, the scale between physician-directed decision-making and medical consumerism is weighing heavier toward giving patients a wider breadth of decisional authority in their health care, and the intensive care unit (ICU) is no exception. The recognition of the importance of autonomous decision-making in the latter half of the twentieth century created a need to establish the shared medical decision-making model that incorporates the values and choices of patients with the medical expertise of the physician, as discussed elsewhere in this text (see Chapter 1, When Does Shared Decision-Making Apply in Adult Critical Care?). A natural extension to the increasingly used shared decision-making model requires that we make reasonable efforts to seek the collaboration with surrogate decision-makers when the patient is unable to represent themselves.1

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kon, A.A., Davidson, J.E., Morrison, W., White, D.B.. Shared decision making in intensive care units: executive summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2016; 44(1): 188201.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.K., Bautista, C.A., Hong, S.Y., Weissfeld, L., White, D.B.. An empirical study of surrogates’ preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2011; 183(7): 915–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenzie, M.S., Auriemma, C.L., Olenik, J., Cooney, E., Gabler, N.B., Halpern, S.D.. An observational study of decision making by medical intensivists. Critical Care Medicine 2015; 43(8): 1660–8.Google Scholar
Azoulay, E., Chevret, S., Leleu, G., Pochard, F., Barboteu, M., Adrie, C., et al. Half the families of intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians. Critical Care Medicine 2000; 28(8): 3044–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilly, C.M., Sonna, L.A., Haley, K.J., Massaro, A.F.. Intensive communication: four-year follow-up from a clinical practice study. Critical Care Medicine 2003; 31(5): S394–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, R.G., Tonietto, T.F., da Silva, D.B., Gutierres, F.A., Ascoli, A.M.. Effectiveness and safety of an extended ICU visitation model for delirium prevention: a before and after study. Critical Care Medicine 2017; 45(10): 1660–7.Google Scholar
McAdam, J.L., Arai, S., Puntillo, K.A.. Unrecognized contributions of families in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34(6): 1097–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azoulay, E., Pochard, F., Kentish-Barnes, N., Chevret, S., Aboab, J.. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 2005; 171(9): 987–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vig, E., Starks, H., Taylor, J., Hopley, E., Fryer-Edwards, K.. Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007; 22(9): 1274–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×