Shaping Foreign Policy in Times of Crisis The Role of International Law and the State Department Legal Adviser
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Foreword: America's Conscience on International Law
- Introduction
- SHAPING FOREIGN POLICY IN TIMES OF CRISIS
- 1 The Compliance Debate
- 2 A Brief History of L
- 3 The Path to L
- 4 The Carter Administration – Herbert J. Hansell (1977–1979)
- 5 The Carter Administration – Roberts B. Owen (1979–1981)
- 6 The Reagan Administration – Davis R. Robinson (1981–1985)
- 7 The Reagan and Bush Administrations – Abraham D. Sofaer (1985–1990)
- 8 The Bush (41st) Administration – Edwin D. Williamson (1990–1993)
- 9 The Bush (41st) Administration – Michael J. Matheson
- 10 The Clinton Administration – Conrad K. Harper (1993–1996)
- 11 The Clinton Administration – David R. Andrews (1997–2000)
- 12 The Bush (43rd) Administration – William H. Taft IV (2001–2005)
- 13 The Bush (43rd) Administration – John B. Bellinger III (2005–2009)
- 14 Department of State Legal Advisers' Roundtable
- 15 Foreign Legal Advisers' Roundtable
- 16 Lawyering the Treatment of Detainees in the War on Terrorism
- 17 Conclusion
- Glossary of Terms
- Notes
- Annex: Legal Advisers of the U.S. Department of State
- Select Bibliography of Legal Scholarship by Department of State Legal Advisers
- About the Authors
- Other Books by the Authors
- Index
- References
Notes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Foreword: America's Conscience on International Law
- Introduction
- SHAPING FOREIGN POLICY IN TIMES OF CRISIS
- 1 The Compliance Debate
- 2 A Brief History of L
- 3 The Path to L
- 4 The Carter Administration – Herbert J. Hansell (1977–1979)
- 5 The Carter Administration – Roberts B. Owen (1979–1981)
- 6 The Reagan Administration – Davis R. Robinson (1981–1985)
- 7 The Reagan and Bush Administrations – Abraham D. Sofaer (1985–1990)
- 8 The Bush (41st) Administration – Edwin D. Williamson (1990–1993)
- 9 The Bush (41st) Administration – Michael J. Matheson
- 10 The Clinton Administration – Conrad K. Harper (1993–1996)
- 11 The Clinton Administration – David R. Andrews (1997–2000)
- 12 The Bush (43rd) Administration – William H. Taft IV (2001–2005)
- 13 The Bush (43rd) Administration – John B. Bellinger III (2005–2009)
- 14 Department of State Legal Advisers' Roundtable
- 15 Foreign Legal Advisers' Roundtable
- 16 Lawyering the Treatment of Detainees in the War on Terrorism
- 17 Conclusion
- Glossary of Terms
- Notes
- Annex: Legal Advisers of the U.S. Department of State
- Select Bibliography of Legal Scholarship by Department of State Legal Advisers
- About the Authors
- Other Books by the Authors
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shaping Foreign Policy in Times of CrisisThe Role of International Law and the State Department Legal Adviser, pp. 251 - 282Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
. The Role of the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, 85 AM. J. INT'L L. 358–373 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Office of the Legal Adviser: The State Department Lawyer and Foreign Affairs, 56 AM. J. INT'L L. 633–684 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Why Do Nations Obey International Law? 106 YALE L.J. 2599, 2618–2627
, The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Law Home, 35 HOUS. L. REV.623 (1998)Google Scholar
, A Common Lawyer Looks at International Law, 78 HARV. L. REV.1396, 1413 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Role of Legal Advisers in Ensuring that Foreign Policy Conforms to International Legal Standards, 14 MICH. J. INT'L L.139 (1992)Google Scholar
& , Rationalism and Revisionism in International Law, 119 HARV. L. REV.1404, 1441 (2006)Google Scholar
, The Office of the Legal Adviser: The State Department Lawyer and Foreign Affairs, 56 AM. J. INT'L L.633 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Role of the Legal Advisers in Ensuring that Foreign Policy Conforms to International Legal Standards, 14 MICH. J. INT'L L.139 (1992)Google Scholar
, Coordination versus Prisoners' Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes, 79 AM. POL. SCI. REV. 923 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers, 14 YALE J. INT'L L.335 (1989)Google Scholar
, An Iterative Perspective on Treaties: A Synthesis of International Relations Theory and International Law, 37 HARV. INT'L L.J.139 (1996)Google Scholar
, International Law in a World of Liberal States, 6 EUR. J. INT'L L.503 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Restoring and (Risking) Interest in International Law, 100 AM. J. INT'L L.259 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Rule-Skepticism, Strategy, and the Limits of International Law, 46 VA. J. INT'L L.563, 583 (2006)Google Scholar
, Do States Have a Moral Obligation to Obey International Law? 55 STANFORD L. REV.1901, 1918 (2003)Google Scholar
, Applying Rational Choice Theory to International Law: The Promise and Pitfalls, J. LEG. STUDIES, 31 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Democracy and the Commitment to International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'l & COMP. L.306, 307 (2006)Google Scholar
, Exploring the Limits of International Human Rights Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L.393, 421 (2006)Google Scholar
, A Negative Proof of International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L.445, 453 n.16 (2006)Google Scholar
, Remarks by an Idealist on the Realism of the Limits of International Law, 34GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 253, 280–281 (2006)Google Scholar
, A Negative Proof of International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L.445, 454–462 (2006)Google Scholar
, Leaving Customary International Law Where It Is: Goldsmith and Posner's The Limits of International Law 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 333, 345 (2006)Google Scholar
, Leaving Customary International Law Where It Is: Goldsmith and Posner's The Limits of International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L. 333, 345 (2006)Google Scholar
, Leaving Customary International Law Where It Is: Goldsmith and Posner's The Limits of International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L.333 (2006)Google Scholar
, Leaving Customary International Law Where It Is: Goldsmith and Posner's The Limits of International Law, 34 GA. J. INT'L & COMP. L.333 (2006)Google Scholar
, The Office of the Legal Adviser: The State Department Lawyer and Foreign Affairs, 57 AM. J. INT'L L.633, 634 (1963)Google Scholar
, , & , Agora: U.S. Forces in Panama: Defenders, Aggressors or Human Rights Activists? 84 AM. J. INT'L L.494 (1990)Google Scholar
, Note, Treaty Termination under the United States Constitution: Reassessing the Legacy of Goldwater v. Carter, 27 N.Y.U. J. INT'L L. & POL.859 (1995)Google Scholar
, Americans Still Captive in Tehran Embassy: British Mission Held 5 Hours by Students, WASHINGTON POST, Nov. 6, 1979, at A1Google Scholar
, , & , Some Perspective on Adjudicating Before the World Court: The Gulf of Maine Case, 79 AM. J. INT'L L.578 (1985)Google Scholar
PARRY AND GRANT ENCYCLOPAEDIC DICTIONARY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW109 ( & eds., Oceana Publications 2003)
, International Law and the State of the Constitution: The Twenty-Fifth Annual National Student Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Policy – 2006: The Constitutional Status of Customary International Law, 30 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y65 (2006)Google Scholar
, , , , , & , Agora: May the President Violate Customary International Law? 81 AM. J. INT'L L.371 (1987)Google Scholar
, THE RISE AND FALL OF THE BREZHNEV DOCTRINE IN SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill & London 2003)Google Scholar
, Adjudication in the International Court of Justice: Progress through Realism, 44 REC. ASS'N B. CITY N.Y.462 (1989)Google Scholar
& , The Reagan Doctrine, Human Rights, and International Law, inRIGHT V. MIGHT: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE USE OF FORCE19–36, (Council on Foreign Relations, 1989)Google Scholar
& , Testing and Development of ‘Exotic’ Systems under the ABM Treaty: The Great Reinterpretation Caper, 99 HARV. L. REV.1956 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The ABM Treaty and the Strategic Defense Initiative, 99 HARV. L. REV.1972 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The ABM Treaty: Legal Analysis in the Political Cauldron, 10 WASHINGTON Q.59, 61–62, (Autumn 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, A Thorn on the Tulip – A Scottish Trial in the Netherlands: The Story behind the Lockerbie Trial, 36 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L.307 (2004)Google Scholar
, , , , & , Agora: The Gulf Crisis in International and Foreign Relations Law, 85 AM. J. INT'L L.63 (1991)Google Scholar
& , A U.S. Perspective on Treaty Succession and Related Issues in the Wake of the Breakup of the USSR and Yugoslavia, 33 VA. J. INT'L L.261 (1993)Google Scholar
, , & , 1993 Correspondents' Agora: UN Membership of the Former Yugoslavia, 87 AM. J. INT'L L. 248 (1993)Google Scholar
, Treaty Succession: Conflicting State Practice, 23 DENVER J. INT'L L. & POL'Y1 (1994)Google Scholar
, State Succession and the International Financial Institutions: Political Criteria or Sound Management? 43 INT'L & COMP. L.Q.776 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , Emote Control: The Substitution of Symbol for Substance in Foreign Policy and International Law, 80 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1045, 1071–1072 (2005)Google Scholar
& , International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, 32 INT'L L.509 (1997)Google Scholar
& , PEACE WITH JUSTICE? WAR CRIMES AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA (Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), at 216–220Google Scholar
(Leigh), Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law, 90 AM. J. INT'L L.278 (1996)Google Scholar
, The Opinions of the International Court of Justice on the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, 91 AM. J. INT'L L.417 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, A Thorn on the Tulip – A Scottish Trial in the Netherlands: The Story Behind the Lockerbie Trial, 36 CASE W. RES. J. INT'L L.307, 308 (2004)Google Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: Legal Regulation of the Use of Force, 93 AM. J. INT'L L. 628 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Legal Basis for NATO Military Action Taken against Serbia/Montenegro, 5 INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING (Winter 1999)Google Scholar
, Reconsidering the Legality of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from Kosovo, 41 WM. & MARY L. REV.1743 (2000)Google Scholar
, , , , , , , , , , , and , Agora: Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict, 97 AM. J. INT'L L.553 (2003)Google Scholar
, , , , , and , Agora (Cont'd): Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict, 97 AM. J. INT'L L.803 (2003)Google Scholar
, Attorney General's Advice on the Iraq War Iraq: Resolution 1441, 54 INT'L & COMP. L.Q., 767–778 (2005)Google Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: Use of Force and Arms Control: Legality of U.S.-Led Invasion of Iraq, 99 AM. J. INT'L L.269 (2005)Google Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: Brief Note: United States Supports Geneva Convention Protocol Authorizing New Emblem, 100 AM. J. INT'L L.244 (2006)Google Scholar
, United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS): Should conservatives Support or Oppose Ratification? 12 TEX. REV. L. & POL'Y459 (2008)Google Scholar
& , The Future of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 88 AM. J. INT'L L.488 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: State Jurisdiction and Immunities: U.S. Supreme Court Finds No Immunity in Tax Lien Case against India, 101 AM. J. INT'L L.642 (2007)Google Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: International Human Rights and Criminal Law: United States Stresses Importance of Accountability, Seeks Lessened Confrontation Over the International Criminal Court, 100 AM. J. INT'L L.477 (2006)Google Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International law : General International and U.S. Foreign Relations Law: United States Abstains on Security Council Resolution Authorizing Referral of Darfur Atrocities to International Criminal Court, 99 AM. J. INT'L L.691 (2005)Google Scholar
, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law: U.S. Strategy for Responding to ICJ's Avena Decision, 99 AM. J. INT'L L.489, 489–90 (2005)Google Scholar
, The Right of Self-Defence and the New Security Imperatives, 9 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (2004)Google Scholar
, Armed Intervention in the 1956 Suez Canal Crisis: The Legal Advice Tendered to the British Government, 37 INT'L COMP. L.Q. 773 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, WAR BY OTHER MEANS: AN INSIDER'S ACCOUNT OF THE WAR ON TERROR168 (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, WAR BY OTHER MEANS: AN INSIDER'S ACCOUNT OF THE WAR ON TERROR33 (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, WAR BY OTHER MEANS: AN INSIDER'S ACCOUNT OF THE WAR ON TERROR47 (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, WAR BY OTHER MEANS: AN INSIDER'S ACCOUNT OF THE WAR ON TERROR168 (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, WAR BY OTHER MEANS: AN INSIDER'S ACCOUNT OF THE WAR ON TERROR183 (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, WAR BY OTHER MEANS: AN INSIDER'S ACCOUNT OF THE WAR ON TERROR182–183 (Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006)Google Scholar
, Abuse of Detainees Undercuts U.S. Authority, 9/11 Panel Says, USA TODAY, Nov. 15, 2005, at 8AGoogle Scholar
, Is There Really “Law” in International Affairs, 10 TRANSNAT'L L. & CONTEMP. PROBS.1, 48 (2000)Google Scholar
, Principle versus Politics: The Solicitor General's Office in Constitutional and Bureaucratic Theory, 44 STAN. L. REV. 799 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Remarks on the Role of the Legal Adviser of the U.S. State Department, 2 EUR. J. INT'L L. 132, 133 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Armed Intervention in the 1956 Suez Canal Crisis: The Legal Advice Tendered to the British Government, 37 INT'L & COMP. L.Q. 773 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar