Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T02:31:02.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Ecological divergence between the sexes in reptiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2009

Richard Shine
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, A08, University of Sydney
Michael Wall
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, A08, University of Sydney
Kathreen Ruckstuhl
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Peter Neuhaus
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW

Living reptiles display an immense diversity in morphological, physiological, behavioural and ecological traits. Indeed, ‘reptiles’ actually constitute a highly polyphyletic assemblage, encompassing four major lineages that diverged >200 million years ago. The extant taxa comprise 7390 species of squamates (lizards and snakes), 295 of turtles, 23 of crocodilians and 2 species of sphenodontians (the New Zealand tuatara) (Uetz, 2000). Correspondingly, the ways in which ecological divergence is manifested between the sexes, and the selective pressures and proximate mechanisms responsible for such divergence, take many forms. This chapter will outline the kinds of ecological traits known to differ between males and females in reptiles, and then explore the degree to which such differences are consistent with alternative hypotheses. Historically, conceptual models to predict and explain segregation between the sexes have been developed by workers with a primary focus on endothermic vertebrates, especially ungulates (see Chapters 2, 3, 9, 10, 11 and 19). Inevitably, the kinds of arguments that have been developed rely upon specific features of these organisms, so that attempts to interpret analogous sexual segregation phenomena in reptiles cannot be neatly subsumed within the same framework. However, the analogies in many cases are clear enough, and the framing of the models broad enough, that strong parallels can be drawn. Thus, we use the conceptual framework developed by ungulate biologists to categorize and investigate causal mechanisms for segregation between the sexes within reptile populations. We then propose a framework with which to analyse studies of sexual segregation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×