Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T00:07:19.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Company security over personal property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Mark Williams
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Haitian Lu
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Chin Aun Ong
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The processes of creating, perfecting and publicising company securities in Hong Kong and China differ significantly. In Hong Kong, general law and/or the Companies Ordinance govern these three processes. In China, two statutes, namely the Property Law (2007) and the Security Law (1995), supplemented by the Judicial Interpretation of the Security Law (2000) and various administrative regulations, regulate the creation, perfection and publicity of companies granting security over their assets.

In theory, companies in Hong Kong may grant their creditor a mortgage or a charge over personal property in the same way as individuals. However, in practice, it is common for company debtors to execute a special document known as a ‘debenture’. The expression ‘debenture’ is commonly used in two situations, namely when the company raises debt capital from the public (in the case of a public company) or privately from financial institutions. Discussion here is strictly confined to the latter situation.

Chitty J described a debenture as ‘a document which either creates a debt or acknowledges it, and any document which fulfils either of these conditions is a debenture’. Section 2(1) of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) gives the term a much broader meaning. It provides that ‘debenture’ includes debenture stock, bonds and any other securities of a company, whether constituting a charge on the assets of the company or not. However, today, whether a document is a debenture rarely poses any serious ‘juristic debate’ in theory or in practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pennington, R.R., Company Law, 5th ed. (London: Butterworths, 1985)Google Scholar
Cao, Shibing, Solutions and Prospects on Questions Related to Chinese Security Mechanism: Based on Security Law and its Judicial Interpretations (Beijing: China Fa Zhi Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Chen, Liangang, ‘Introduction of Floating Charge into Chinese Law’, People's Justice 3 (1999), 28–9Google Scholar
Chen, Benhan, ‘Collective Mortgage, Floating Charge and Perfection of Enterprise Security in China’, Modern Law Review 4 (1998), 53–6Google Scholar
Farrar, J.H., ‘Floating Charges and Priorities’, Con 38 (1974), 315Google Scholar
Farrar, J.H. and Hannigan, B.M., Farrar's Company Law, 4th ed. (London: Butterworths, 1998)Google Scholar
Naser, K.J., ‘The Juridical Basis of the Floating Charge’, Co. Lawyer 15 (1994), 11 at pp. 15–16Google Scholar
Gough, W.J., Company Charges, 2nd ed. (London: Butterworths, 1996)Google Scholar
Worthington, S., ‘Fixed Charges over Book Debts and Other Receivables’, LQR 113 (1997), 562Google Scholar
Naccarato, J. and Street, P., ‘Re New Bullas Trading Ltd: Fixed Charge over Book Debts – Two into One Won't Go’, JIBL&FL 9(3) (1994), 109–16Google Scholar
Tomasic, R. and Bottomley, S., Corporations Law in Australia (Sydney: Federation Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Lipton, P. and Herzberg, A., Understanding Company Law, 6th ed. (Sydney: LBC Information Services, 1995)Google Scholar
Berg, A., ‘The Cuckoo in the Nest of Corporate Insolvency: Some Aspects of the Spectrum Case’, JBL 22 (2006), 22Google Scholar
Goode, R.M., Legal Problems of Credit and Security, 3rd ed. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003)Google Scholar
Worthington, S., Proprietary Interest in Commercial Transactions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), pp. 74–77Google Scholar
Beale, H. et al., The Law of Personal Property Security (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Lacy, J., The United Kingdom Company Law – Reflections on the Ambit and Reform of Part 12 of the Companies Act 1985 and the Doctrine of Constructive Notice (London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 2002)Google Scholar
Lawson, M., ‘The Reform of the Law Relating to Security Interests in Property’, JBL 287 (1989), at p. 297Google Scholar
Gao, Shengping, Studies on Chattel Mortgage (Beijing: China Industry and Commerce Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×