Book contents
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Reviews
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought: History, Image, and Structure
- Part I Histories of the Legal Contemporary
- Part II Images of the Legal Contemporary?
- Part III Structures of the Legal Contemporary
- Index
- References
Part III - Structures of the Legal Contemporary
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 December 2017
Book contents
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Reviews
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought: History, Image, and Structure
- Part I Histories of the Legal Contemporary
- Part II Images of the Legal Contemporary?
- Part III Structures of the Legal Contemporary
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 363 - 550Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited – Chapter 19
Arnold, Thurman 1937. The Folklore of Capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix 1935. “Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–49.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1963. “Certain neurotic mechanisms in jealousy, paranoia and homosexuality,” in Freud, Sigmund, Sexuality and the Psychology of Love. Rieff, Philip (ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 1986. “Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology,” Journal of Legal Education 36: 518–62.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2004. “The disenchantment of logically formal legal rationality, or Max Weber's sociology in the genealogy of the contemporary mode of western legal thought,” Hastings Law Journal 55: 1031–76.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2007. “A left phenomenological alternative to the Hart/Kelsen theory of legal interpretation,” in Kennedy, Duncan, Essays on Adjudication. Boulder, CO: Davies, available at http://www.duncankennedy.net/documents/Photo%20articles/A%20Left%20Phenomenological%20Alternative%20to%20the%20HartKelsen%20Theory%20of%20Legal%20Interpretation.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan M. 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law and Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mathias 2006. “Who is afraid of the total constitution? Constitutional rights as principles and constitutionalization of private law,” German Law Journal 7: 341–69.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2013. “Ronald Dworkin: the moral quest,” New York Review of Books 60(18), available at www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/nov/21/ronald-dworkin-moral-quest/?pagination = false. Accessed March 6, 2014.Google Scholar
Peller, Gary 1985. “The metaphysics of American law,” California Law Review 73: 1151–290.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 1972. “A theory of negligence,” The Journal of Legal Studies 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard 1997. “Bad faith: review of Duncan Kennedy, A Critique of Adjudication (Fin De Siecle). New Republic (June 9), pp. 34–7.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 1998. “The problematics of moral and legal theory,” Harvard Law Review 111: 1637–717.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. Savage, Denis (transl.) New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2007. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 20
Anghie, Anthony 2007. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, Anthony 1993. “The heart of my home: colonialism, environmental damage, and the Nauru case,” Harvard International Law Journal 34: 445–506.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy and Halley, Janet (eds.) 2002. Left Legalism/Left Critique, Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Paul 2013. Meeting Place: The Human Encounter and the Challenge of Coexistence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley 2006. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John and Comaroff, Jean 2012. Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America is evolving Toward Africa. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal 2006. “The persona of the philosopher and the rhetorics of office in early modern England,” in Condren, , Gaukroger, , and Hunter, (eds.), pp. 66–89.Google Scholar
Condren, Conal, Gaukroger, Stephen, and Hunter, Ian (eds.) 2006. The Philosopher in Early Modern Europe: The Nature of a Contested Identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn 2007. Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cooper, John 2014. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Curthoys, Ann, Genovese, Ann and Reilly, Alexander 2008. Rights and Redemption: History, Law and Indigenous People. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
de Búrca, Gráinne, Kilpatrick, Claire, and Scott, Joanne (eds.) 2014. Liber Amicorum David M Trubek. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2015. “Structuralist Legal Histories,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 37–59.Google Scholar
Dorsett, Shaunnagh and Hunter, Ian (eds.) 2010. Law and Politics in British Colonial Thought: Transpositions of Empire. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McVeigh, Shaun 2012b. “Conduct of laws: Native Title, responsibility, and some limits of jurisdictional thinking,” Melbourne University Law Review 36: 470–93.Google Scholar
Duncanson, Ian and Tomlins, Christopher 1982. “The first Australian law and history conference,” Australian Historical Association Bulletin 32: September.Google Scholar
Geary, Adam 2005–2006. “Anxiety and affirmation: critical legal studies and the critical tradition(s),” New York University Review of Law and Social Change 31: 585.Google Scholar
Gaita, Raimond 2000. Common Humanity: Thinking about Love and Humanity. Melbourne: Text Publishers.Google Scholar
Gaita, Raimond 2004b. “Breach of trust: truth, morality and politics,” Quarterly Essay 16: 1–68.Google Scholar
Genovese, Ann 2014. “On Australian feminist tradition: three notes on conduct, inheritance and the relations of historiography and jurisprudence,” Journal of Australian Feminist Studies 38: 430–44.Google Scholar
Genovese, Ann 2015. “On The Liberal Promise: A conversation,” Australian Feminist Law Journal 41: 1–18.Google Scholar
Genovese, Ann and McVeigh, Shaun 2015. “Nineteen eighty three: A Jurisographic report on Commonwealth v Tasmania,” Griffith Law Review 24: 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds.) 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 1993. “Sleeping with the enemy: an essay on the politics of critical legal studies in America,” New York University Law Review 68: 389–425.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2000. “Law induced anxiety: legists, anti-lawyers and the boredom of legality,” Social and Legal Studies 9: 143–63.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2001. “The personal and the political: Duncan Kennedy as I imagine him: The man, the work, his scholarship, and the polity,” Cardozo Law Review 22: 971–90.Google Scholar
Goot, Murray and Rowse, Tim (eds.) 1994. Make a Better Offer: the Politics of Mabo. Leichhardt, NSW: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 1994. “‘Native Title: Acts of State and the Rule of Law,” in Goot, and Rowse, (eds.), pp. 97–109.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2001. Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2008. “The desire for deconstruction: Derrida's metaphysics of law,” Communication, Politics and Culture 41: 6–29.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2009. “Postmodernist histories,” Intellectual History Review 19: 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian 2010. “Global justice and regional metaphysics: on the critical history of the law of nation and nations,” in Dorsett, and Hunter, (eds.), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David 1995. “Walks of life: Mauss on the human gymnasium,” Body and Society 1: 65–81.Google Scholar
Kairys, David (ed.) 1982. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1982. “Legal education as training for hierarchy” in Kairys, (ed.), pp. 54–75.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1994. “A semiotics of legal argument,” in Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law (Yearbook), 1992, Vol. III – Book 2: The Protection of Human Rights in Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic and Martinus Nijhoff; Florence, Academy of European Law, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1997. A Critique of Adjudication [Fin De Siecle]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2002. “The critique of rights in critical legal studies,” in Brown, and Halley, (eds.), pp. 178–210.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2004. “The disenchantment of logically formal legal rationality or Max Weber's sociology in the genealogy of the contemporary mode of western legal thought,” Hastings Law Journal 55: 1031–76.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006a. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Washington, D.C.: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006b. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014a. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law and Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014b. “Critical legal perspectives on global governance,” in de Búrca, , Kilpatrick, , and Scott, (eds.), pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
Lea, Tess and Bill, Wilson (eds.) 2005. The State of the North: A Selection of Papers from the 2003 Charles Darwin Symposium. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund 1969. “Vico and Lévi-Strauss on the origins of humanity,” in Tagliacozzo, (ed.), pp. 309–18.Google Scholar
MacLean, Ian 1992. Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance: the Case of Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, Mark 2014. “Koowarta and the rival Indigenous international: our place as Indigenous peoples in the International,” Griffith Law Review 23: 110–26.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Shaun (ed.) 2007. Jurisprudence of Jurisdiction. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Cavendish.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Shaun 2016. “Jurisprudent of London: arts of association,” Law Text Culture 20 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Manderson, Desmond 1998. “Unutterable shame/unuttered guilt: semantics, aporia, and the possibility of Mabo,” Law Text Culture 4: 234–44.Google Scholar
Memmott, Paul 2005. “Values of a bi-cultural society in Alice Springs,” in Lea, and Wilson, (eds.), pp. 231–242.Google Scholar
Minson, Jeffrey 2009. “S. Toussaint, Humanismes Antihumanismes, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 2008,” Cromohs, 14: 1–19.Google Scholar
Minson, Jeffrey 2014. “How to speak well of the state: a rhetoric of civil prudence,” UC Irvine Law Review 4: 437–70.Google Scholar
Munday, Martha and Alain, Pottage (eds.) 2004. Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Noel 2000. “Principles of communal Native Title,” Indigenous Law Bulletin 5(3): 4–7.Google Scholar
Pether, Penny 1999. “On foreign ground: grand narratives, situated specificities, and the praxis of critical theory and law,” Law and Critique 10: 211–36.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul 1970. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rush, Peter 1997. “An altered jurisdiction: corporeal traces of law,” Griffith Law Review 6: 144–68.Google Scholar
Saunders, David 2002. Anti-Lawyers: Religion and the Critics of Law and State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tagliacozzo, Giorgio (ed.) 1969. Gambattista Vico: An International Symposium. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan 2004. “Res religiosae on the categories of religion and commerce in Roman law,” in Munday, and Pottage, (eds.), pp. 40–72.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2015. “The presence and absence of legal mind: a commentary on Duncan Kennedy,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 78: 1–17.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Irene 2015. Aboriginal Peoples Colonialism and International Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webber, Jonathan 2011. “Bad Faith and the other,” in Webber, Jonathan (ed.) Reading Sartre: on Phenomenology and Existentialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Case Cited – Chapter 20
Mabo v Queensland (N0 2) (1992) 175 Commonwealth Law Reports 1.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 21
Beaney, Michael (ed.) 2013b. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1989. “The religiously devout judge,” Notre Dame Law Review 64: 932–44.Google Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie 1990. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules and Scott, Shapiro (eds.), 2002. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2012. “Experimental pragmatism in the third globalization,” Contemporary Pragmatism 9: 181–204.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014a. “Pragmatic liberalism: the outlook of the dead,” Boston College Law Review 55: 1042–98.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Kennedy, Duncan 2015. “Foreword: theorizing contemporary legal thought,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: i–x.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2016. “A context for legal history, or, this is not your father's contextualism,” American Journal of Legal History 56: 29–40.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2014. “A Short history of the British critical legal conference or, the responsibility of the critic,” Law & Critique 25: 187–98.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1993. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Enoch, David 2011. “Reason-giving and the law,” in Green, and Leiter, (eds.), pp. 35–73.Google Scholar
Enoch, David. Unpublished. “Is general jurisprudence interesting?” https://www.academia.edu/11623290/Is_General_Jurisprudence_InterestingGoogle Scholar
Finkin, Matthew W. 2011. “The death and transfiguration of labor law,” Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 33: 171–86.Google Scholar
Fischl, Richard M. 1992. “The question that killed critical legal studies,” Law & Social Inquiry 17: 779–820.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun 2012. “On the possibility of naturalizing phenomenology,” in Zahavi, (ed.) pp. 70–85.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Grant 1974. The Death of Contract. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2004. “Satirical legal studies: from the legists to the lizard,” Michigan Law Review 103: 397–517.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2017. “Who are we? Persona, office, suspicion, and critique,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie and Leiter, Brian (eds.) 2011. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark 2011. “The Standard picture and its discontents,” in Green, and Leiter, (eds.), pp. 39–104.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark 2014. “The moral impact theory of law,” Yale Law Journal 123: 1288–343.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Mark 2016. “How to explain things with force,” Harvard Law Review 129: 1932–980.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1986. “Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology,” Journal of Legal Education 36: 518–62.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1997. A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2004. “Legal education and the reproduction of hierarchy: a polemic against the system,” in Kennedy, Duncan (ed.) Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic Against the System. New York University Press, pp. 9–144.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law & Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. 2015. “Doing without the concept of law,” New York University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Working Paper no. 15–33, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2640605)Google Scholar
Kreitner, Roy 2012. “On the new pluralism in contract theory,” Suffolk University Law Review 45: 915–34.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah and Williford, Kenneth (eds.) 2006. Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian 2004. “The end of empire: Dworkin and jurisprudence in the 21st century,” Rutgers Law Journal 36: 165–18.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian 2007. Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luban, David 2016. “Time mindedness and jurisprudence,” Virginia Law Review 101: 903–17.Google Scholar
May, Todd 2002. “On the very idea of continental (or for that matter Anglo-American) philosophy,” Metaphilosophy 33: 401–25.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception. Smith, Colin (transl.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2017. “Legal theory among the ruins,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1974. The Gay Science. Kaufmann, Walter (transl.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen R. 1996. “The varieties of legal positivism,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 9: 361–81.Google Scholar
Pojanowski, Jeffrey A. 2015. “Redrawing the dividing lines between natural law and positivism(s),” Virginia Law Review 101: 1023–7.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric 2003. “Economic analysis of contract law after three decades: success or failure?” Yale Law Journal 112: 829–80.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2009. Law and Literature. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 2015. “Jurisprudence, the sociable science,” Virginia Law Review 101: 869–902.Google Scholar
Preston, Aaron 2006. Analytic Philosophy: The History of an Illusion. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Reginster, Bernard 2006. The Affirmation of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schaus, Steven 2015. “How to think about law as morality: a comment on Greenberg and Hershovitz,” Yale Law Journal Forum 124: 224–45.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1997. “Law as the continuation of god by other means,” California Law Review 85: 427–40.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2002. “The aesthetics of American law,” Harvard Law Review 115: 1047–118.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009. “Formalism and realism in ruins (mapping the logics of collapse),” 95 Iowa Law Review 95: 195–244.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven D. 1988. “Why should courts obey the law?” Georgetown Law Journal 77: 113–64.Google Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff 2013. “The role of phenomenology in analytic philosophy,” in Beaney, (ed.), pp. 1117–31.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2002. “Phenomenology and the development of analytic philosophy,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 40: 115–42.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2007a. “In what sense is phenomenology transcendental?” Southern Journal of Philosophy 45: 85–92.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2007b. “Conceptual analysis in phenomenology and ordinary language philosophy,” in Beaney, (ed.), pp. 270–84.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2015. “The presence and absence of legal mind: a comment on Duncan Kennedy's Three Globalizations,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: 1–17.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2017. “Of origin: toward a history of contemporary legal thought,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Burg, Wibren forthcoming. “Law as a second-order essentially contested concept,” JurisprudenceGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy 2002. “Legal and political philosophy,” in Coleman, and Shapiro, (eds.), pp. 352–81.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. unpublished. “Jurisprudence for hedgehogs,” New York University School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Working Paper no. 13–45, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2290309Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1988. “Legal formalism: on the immanent rationality of law,” Yale Law Journal 97: 949–1016.Google Scholar
Wells, Catharine P. 2012. “Thoughts on Duncan Kennedy's third globalization,” Comparative Law Review 3: 1–10.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Dan (ed.) 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 22
Barzun, Charles 2014. “Inside-out: beyond the internal/external distinction in legal scholarship,” Virginia Law Review 101: 1203–88.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander and Tobin, Emma 2008. “Natural Kinds,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar
Bloom, Frederic M. 2005. “Unconstitutional courses,” Washington University Law Quarterly 83: 1679–731.Google Scholar
Clark, David S. (ed.) 2007. International Encyclopedia of Law and Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earle, William 1955. “Introduction,” in Jaspers, Karl, Reason and Existenz. New York: Noonday Press, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald 1985. “The evolutionary tradition in jurisprudence,” Columbia Law Review 85: 38–94.Google Scholar
Fennell, Lee Ann 2012. “Lumpy property,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160: 1955–93.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Smith, A. M. Sheridan (transl.). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Freeman, Alan 1981. “Truth and mystification in legal scholarship,” Yale Law Journal 90: 1229–37.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1974. “Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change,” Law & Society Review 9: 95–161.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J. 1984. “Value creation by business lawyers: legal skills and asset pricing,” Yale Law Journal 94: 234–313.Google Scholar
Hale, Robert 1923. “Coercion and distribution in a supposedly noncoercive state,” Political Science Quarterly 38: 470–94.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr. 1959. “Foreword: the time chart of the justices,” Harvard Law Review 73: 84–125.Google Scholar
Harvey, David 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David 2011. “A rotation in contemporary legal scholarship,” German Law Journal 12: 338–75.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1991. “The stakes of law or Hale and Foucault!” Legal Studies Forum 15: 327–65.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre 1980. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel. Bloom, Allan (ed.), Nichols, James H., Jr. (transl.). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence 1995. “Understanding changed readings: fidelity and theory,” Stanford Law Review 47: 395–472.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl 1934. “The Constitution as an institution,” Columbia Law Review 34: 1–40.Google Scholar
LoPucki, Lynn M. 2016. “Dawn of the discipline-based law school,” Journal of Legal Education 65: 506–42.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg 1971b. “Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat,” in Lukács, Georg 1971a pp. 83–222.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2017. “Legal theory among the ruins,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
Plato, , 2013. Cratylus. Jowett, Benjamin (transl.) The Internet Classics Archive. Available at http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/cratylus.html.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2009. “The state of legal scholarship today, a comment on Schlag,” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 845–55.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard 2016. Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Post, Robert and Siegel, Neil S 2007. “Theorizing the law/politics distinction: neutral principles, affirmative action, and the enduring legacy of Paul Mishkin,” California Law Review 95: 1473–513.Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J. 2015. “Jurisprudence – the sociable science,” Virginia Law Review 101: 869–901.Google Scholar
Rubio, Fernando Dominguez and Baert, Patrick (eds.) 2012. The Politics of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von 1975. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. Hayward, Abraham (transl.). New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1989. “The problem of transaction costs,” Southern California Law Review 62: 1661–1700.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1991. “Normativity and the Politics of Form,“ University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139: 801–932.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2002. “The aesthetics of American law,” Harvard Law Review 115: 1047–1115.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009a. “Spam jurisprudence, air law, and the rank anxiety of nothing happening,” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 803–35.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009b. “The dedifferentiation problem,” Continental Philosophy Review 42: 35–62.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2013. “Coase minus the Coase theorem – some problems with Chicago transaction cost analysis,” Iowa Law Review 99: 175–223.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2015. “How to do things with Hohfeld,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 185–234.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Jeanne L. 1991. “Abduction from the seraglio: feminist methodologies and the logic of imagination,” Texas Law Review 70: 109–210.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1989. “The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics,” Harvard Law Review 130: 1–39.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 2009. The Self Awakened: Pragmatism Unbound. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
West, Robin L. 2011. Normative Jurisprudence: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd 1984. When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 23
Abel, Richard L. (ed.) 1976b. The Politics of Informal Justice: The American Experience. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Addresses Delivered at the National Conference on the Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice 1976. Federal Rules Decisions 70: 79–246.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2009. “Revisiting against settlement: some reflections on dispute resolution and public values,” Fordham Law Review 78: 1143–70.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2010. “Governance legalism: Hayek and Sabel on reason and rules, organization and law,” Wisconsin Law Review 2010: 357–87.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2011. “The family, the market, and ADR,” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2011: 91–126.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–120.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Kennedy, Duncan 2015. “Foreword: theorizing contemporary legal thought,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: i–x.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Christopher, Tomlins (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. and Sabel, Charles F. 1998. “A constitution of democratic experimentalism,” Columbia Law Review 98: 267–473.Google Scholar
Elkin, Mayer 1982. “Divorce mediation: an alternative process for helping families to close the book gently,” Family Court Review 20: iii–vi.Google Scholar
Fine, Ben 2001. Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1982. “The social and political foundations of adjudication,” Law and Human Behavior 6: 121–8.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1970. “Mediation – its forms and functions,” Southern California Law Review 44: 305–39.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1978. “The forms and limits of adjudication,” Harvard Law Review 92: 353–409.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B. 1985. Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 1: Rules and Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard 1982. “Neighborhood justice and the social control problems of American capitalism: a perspective,” in Abel, (ed.) pp. 207–48.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard 1987. Neighborhood Justice in Capitalist Society: The Expansion of the Informal State. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kolb, Deborah M. (ed.) 1994. When Talk Works: Profiles of Mediators (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. “Popular constitutionalism, circa 2004,” California Law Review 92: 959–1011.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Jethro K. and Henry, James F. 1986. “Lessons from the alternative dispute resolution movement,” University of Chicago Law Review 53: 424–39.Google Scholar
McThenia, Andrew W., and Shaffer, Thomas L. 1985. “For reconciliation,” Yale Law Journal 94: 1660–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie 1995a. “The many ways of mediation: the transformations of traditions, ideologies, paradigms and practices,” Negotiation Journal 11: 217–42.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1995b. “Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases),” Georgetown Law Journal 83: 2663–96.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 1994. “Albie M. Davis: community mediation as community organizing,” in Kolb, (ed.), pp. 245–78.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. 1975. “Child-custody adjudication: judicial functions in the face of indeterminacy,” Law and Contemporary Problems 39: 226–93.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. 1985. “Divorce bargaining: the limits on private ordering,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 18: 1015–37.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis 1979. “Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce,” Yale Law Journal 88: 950–97.Google Scholar
Muehlebach, Andrea K. 2012. The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pahuja, Sundhya 2004. “This is the world: have faith,” European Journal of International Law 15: 381–93.Google Scholar
Patton, Leah K. 1984. “Settling environmental disputes: the experience with and future of environmental mediation,” Environmental Law 14: 547–54.Google Scholar
Phillips, Barbara A. and Piazza, Anthony C. 1983. “The role of mediation in public interest disputes,” Hastings Law Journal 34: 1231–44.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe 1911. “The scope and purpose of sociological jurisprudence,” Harvard Law Review 25: 140–68.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe 1912. “Social problems and the courts,” The American Journal of Sociology 18: 331–41.Google Scholar
Riles, Annnelise 2015. ”From comparison to collaboration: experiments with a new scholarly and political form,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 147–83.Google Scholar
Rittich, Kerry 2006. “The future of law and development: second-generation reforms and the incorporation of the social,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 203–52.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas 2000. “Community, citizenship, and the third way,” American Behavioral Scientist 43: 1395–411.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles and William, H. Simon 2017. “Democratic experimentalism,” in Desautels-Stein and Tomlins (eds.), pp. 477–98.Google Scholar
Sander, Frank E. A. and Goldberg, Stephen B. 1994. “Fitting the forum to the fuss: a user-friendly guide to selecting an ADR procedure,” Negotiation Journal 10: 49–68.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin 1987. “The ‘new formalism’ in disputing and dispute processing,” Law and Society Review 21: 695–715.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen (2008). “Corporate social responsibility: towards a new market-embedded morality?” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9: 371–94.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1985. “Legal informality and redistributive politics,” Clearinghouse Review 19: 384–91.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence and Cruikshank, Jeffrey L. 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ury, William L., Brett, Jeanne M., and Goldberg, Stephen B. 1988. Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 24
Alberstein, Michal 2002. Pragmatism and Law: From Philosophy to Dispute Resolution. United Kingdom: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Alberstein, Michal 2008. “ADR and collective trauma: constructing the forum for the traumatic fuss,” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 10: 11–42.Google Scholar
Alberstein, Michal 2009. “Measure of legal formalism in traumatic cases: stylistic analysis,” Hamishpat 6: 349–408 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Alberstein, Michal 2012. “Measuring legal formalism: reading hard cases with soft frames,” in Sarat, Austin (ed.) Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Vol. 57. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, pp. 161–99.Google Scholar
Alberstein, Michal 2016. “The ‘law of alternatives’: conflict resolution as the art of reconstruction,” in Sarat, Austin (ed.) Studies in Law, Politics, and Society Volume 70. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, pp. 149–80.Google Scholar
Burton, John W. 1997. Violence Explained: The Sources of Conflict, Violence and Crime and Their Prevention. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. and Resnik, Judith 2003. Adjudication and its Alternatives: An Introduction to Procedure. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1979. “The Supreme Court, 1978 term. Foreword: the forms of justice,” Harvard Law Review 93: 1–58.Google Scholar
Golding, Martin P. 1979. “The nature of compromise: a preliminary inquiry,” Nomos 21: 3–25.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1976. “Form and substance in private law adjudication,” Harvard Law Review 89: 1685–778.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1986. “Freedom and constraint in adjudication: a critical phenomenology,” Journal of Legal Education 36: 518–62.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. ”Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73).Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David 2002. The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territories. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H. and Kornhauser, Lewis 1979. “Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce,” Yale Law Journal 88: 950–97.Google Scholar
Rothman, Jay and Land, Randy 2004. “The Cincinnati police-community relations collaborative,” Criminal Justice 18: 34–42.Google Scholar
Rothman, Jay 2006. “Identity and conflict: collaboratively addressing policy-community conflict in Cincinnati, Ohio,” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 22: 105.Google Scholar
Rothman, Jay 2012. “Applying action evaluation on a large scale: Cincinnati police-community relations collaborative–successes, failures and lessons learned,” In Rothman, Jay (ed.) From Identity-Based Conflict to Identity-Based Cooperation. New York: Springer, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
Scenes from a Mediation 1983 (VHS video). Mill Valley, CA: Center for the Development of Mediation in the Law.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2004. “Solving problems vs. claiming rights: the pragmatist challenge to legal liberalism,” William & Mary Law Review 46: 127–212.Google Scholar
Sinai, Yuval and Alberstein, Michal 2016. [Forthcoming]. “Expanding judicial discretion: between legal and conflict considerations,” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 21: 221–78.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1988. “Legal formalism: on the immanent rationality of law,” Yale Law Journal 97: 949–1016.Google Scholar
Cases Cited – Chapter 24
Floyd v. City of New York (2013) 959 F. Supp. 2D 540.Google Scholar
Plonit and Ploni (Prospective Adoptive Parents) v Attorney-General [2005] AFA 377/05.Google Scholar
Chalfa v. Gold [1987] 48 Israeli SC (1) 22, CA 724/87.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 251
De Burca, Grainne, Keohane, Robert O., and Sabel, Charles, 2013. “New modes of pluralist governance,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45: 723–83.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. and Sabel, Charles F. 1998. “A constitution of democratic experimentalism,” Columbia Law Review 98: 267–469.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald, Scott, Robert and Sabel, Charles F. 2008. “Contracting for innovation,” Columbia Law Review 109: 431–502.Google Scholar
Noonan, Kathleen G., Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H., 2009. “Legal accountability in the service-based welfare state,” Law & Social Inquiry 34: 523–68.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 2006. “A real time revolution in routines,” in Adler, Paul and Hecksher, Charles (eds.) The Corporation as a Collaborative Community. New York: Russell Sage, pp. 106–56.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 2012. “Dewey, democracy, and democratic experimentalism,” Contemporary Pragmatism 9: 35–55.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan, 2008. “Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU,” European Law Journal 14: 271–327.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Simon, William H., 2012. “Contextualizing regimes: institutionalization as a response to the limits of interpretation and policy engineering,” Michigan Law Review 110: 1265–1308.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Simon, William H., 2015. “Minimalism and experimentalism in the administrative state,” Georgetown Law Journal 100: 53–93.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Simon, William H., 2016. “The duty of responsible administration and the problem of police accountability,” Yale Journal on Regulation 33: 165–212.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2006. “Toyota jurisprudence: legal theory and rolling rule regimes,” in de Burca, Grainne and Scott, Joanne (eds.) Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Oxford: Hart, pp. 37–64.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2012. “The institutional configuration of Deweyan democracy,” Contemporary Pragmatism 9: 5–34.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 26
Anderson, Terence and Twining, William 1991. Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Gargi 2003. “In defense of amateurism,” Ethnic & Racial Studies 26: 523–7.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1961. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Oxford, UK: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Gordley, James 1993. “Mere brilliance: the recruitment of law professors in the United States,” American Journal of Comparative Law 41: 367–84.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1994. “A game of cat's cradle: science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies,” Configurations 2: 59–71.Google Scholar
Keen, Andrew 2008. The Cult of the Amateur: How Blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the Rest of Today's User-Generated Media Are Destroying Our Economy, Our Culture and Our Values. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kocourek, Albert and Wigmore, John Henry (eds.) 1915. Primitive and Ancient Legal Institutions. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth 1997. “Recontextualization as socialization: text and pragmatics in the law school classroom,” in Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg (eds.), Natural Histories of Discourse. University of Chicago Press, pp. 229–52.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth 2007. The Language of Law School: Learning to Think Like a Lawyer. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pistor, Katharina 2012. “Toward a legal theory of finance” (working paper prepared for the European Corporate Governance Institute) https://works.bepress.com/katharina_pistor/17/.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise 2011. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise and Uchida, Takashi 2009. “Reforming knowledge? A socio-legal critique of the legal education reforms in Japan,” Drexel Law Review 1: 3–51.Google Scholar
Roalfe, William R. 1977. John Henry Wigmore: Scholar and Reformer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stebbins, Robert A. 1992. Amateurs, Professionals, and Serious Leisure. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Gillian, Tett 2015. The Silo Effect: The Perils of Expertise and the Promise of Breaking Down Barriers. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Twining, William 1985. Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry 1897a. “The pledge idea: a study in comparative legal ideas,” Harvard Law Review 10: 321–50.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry 1897b. “The pledge idea: a study in comparative legal ideas II,” Harvard Law Review 10: 389–417.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry 1904. A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry 1913. The Principles of Judicial Proof as Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry 1936. A Panorama of the World's Legal Systems. Washington, DC: Washington Law Book Company.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry 1941. A Kaleidoscope of Justice: Containing Authentic Accounts of Trial Scenes from All Times and Climes. Washington, DC: Washington Law Book Company.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 27
Aranda, Julieta et al. 2010. “What is contemporary art? Issue two,” E-Flux Journal 12: 1.Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix 1935. “Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach,” Columbia Law Review 6: 809–49.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2017. “Law and language as information systems: perish the thought!” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 155–76.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur 2014. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History, updated edition. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014. “Pragmatic liberalism: the outlook of the dead,” Boston College Law Review 55: 1041–98.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2018. The Jurisprudence of Style: A Structuralist History of American Pragmatism and Liberal Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert and Taylor, Charles 2015. Retrieving Realism. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heuer, Christopher P, Jackson, Matthew Jesse, and Perchuk, Andrew 2009. “Questionnaire: Heuer, Jackson, and Perchuk,” October 130: 84–7.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2017. “Who are we? Persona, office, suspicion, and critique,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric 1992. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1979. “The structure of Blackstone's Commentaries,” Buffalo Law Review 28: 205–382.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1997. A Critique of Adjudication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Shaun 2015. “Afterword: Office and the Conduct of the Minor Jurisprudent,” UC Irvine Law Review 5: 499–512.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2017. “Legal theory among the ruins,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1997. Untimely Meditations. Breazeale, Daniel (ed.), Hollingdale, Reginald John (transl.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles and Simon, William H. 2017. “Democratic experimentalism,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 477–98.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009. “Formalism and realism in ruins (mapping the logics of collapse),” Iowa Law Review 95: 195–244.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2017. “The knowledge bubble: something amiss in Expertopia,” in Desautels-Stein, and Tomlins, (eds.), pp. 428–53.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Afterword
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2012a. “The market as a legal concept,” Buffalo Law Review 60: 387–492.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2012b. “Race as a legal concept,” Columbia Journal of Race and Law 2: 1–74.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014. “Pragmatic liberalism: the outlook of the dead,” Boston College Law Review 55: 1041–98.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Kennedy, Duncan 2015. “Foreword: theorizing contemporary legal thought,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: i–x.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2016a. “International legal structuralism: a primer,” International Theory 8: 201–35.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2016b. “A context for legal history, or, this is not your father's contextualism,” American Journal of Legal History 56: 29–40.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2004. “History in the American juridical field: narrative, justification, and explanation,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 16: 323–98.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2007. “How autonomous is law?” Annual Reviews in Law and Social Science 3: 45–68.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2009. “The strait gate: the past, history, and legal scholarship,” Law, Culture, and the Humanities 5: 11–42.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher and Comaroff, John 2011. “‘Law as…’: theory and practice in legal history,” UC Irvine Law Review 1: 1039–79.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2012. “After critical legal history: scope, scale, and structure,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 31–68.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2016. “Historicism and materiality in legal theory,” in del Mar, Maksymilian and Lobban, Michael (eds.), Law in Theory and History: New Essays in a Neglected Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 58–83.Google Scholar