Alcoff, L., and Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Altmann, J. (1974). Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods. Behavior, 49, 227–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Angier, N. (1991, April 14). Molecular “Hot Spot” Hits at a Cause of Liver Cancer. New York Times.Google Scholar

Antony, L. (1993). Quine as Feminist: The Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology. In Antony, L. and Witt, C. (Eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Antony, L., and Witt, C. (Eds.). (1993). A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Aoki, K. (1982). A Condition for Group Selection to Prevail over Counteracting Individual Selection. Evolution, 36, 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, A. J., and Fristrup, K. (1982). The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion. Paleobiology, 8, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, S. J., and Wade, M. J. (1984). On the Measurement of Natural and Sexual Selection: Applications. Evolution, 38, 720–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atkinson, T. (1974). Amazon Odyssey. New York: Links Books.Google Scholar

Awards: 1989. (1989). Science, 243, 672 (3).

Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The Evolution of Cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Babbitt, S. E. (1993). Feminism and Objective Interests: The Role of Transformation Experiences in Rational Deliberation. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bailey, N. T. J. (1967). The Mathematical Approach to Biology and Medicine. London and New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Baird, P. A. (1990). Genetics and Health Care: A Paradigm Shift. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 33, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1992). The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bayer, R. (1981). Homosexuality and American Psychology: The Politics of Diagnosis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Beach, F. (1973). Human Sexuality and Evolution. In Montanga, W. and Sadler, W. (Eds.) Advances in Behavioral Biology (pp. 333–365). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Beatty, J. (1980). Optimal-Design Models and the Strategy of Model Building in Evolutionary Biology. Philosophy of Science, 47, 532–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beatty, J. (1981). What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory? PSA 1980: Vol. Two. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Beatty, J. (1982). The Insights and Oversights of Molecular Genetics: the Place of the Evolutionary Perspective. PSA 1982: Vol. One. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Beckner, M. (1959). The Biological Way of Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, D. (1975). The T-Locus of the Mouse. Cell, 6, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, J. (1965). Substance, Reality, and Primary Qualities. American Philosophical Quarterly, 2(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Berkeley, G. (1871). Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein. R. (1988). The Rage against Reason. In McMullin, E. (Ed.), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Bleier, R. (1984). Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Bleier, R. (1986). Sex Differences Research: Science or Belief? In Bleier, R. (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Blonder, L. (1993). Review of The Adapted Mind. American Anthropologist, 95, 777–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bock, W. (1980). The Definition and Recognition of Biological Adaptation. American Zoologist, 20, 217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boorman, S. A., and Levitt, P. R. (1973). Group Selection on the Boundary of a Stable Population. Theoretical Population Biology, 4, 85–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boorman, S. A. (1978). Mathematical Theory of Group Selection: Structure of Group Selection in Founder Populations Determined from Convexity of the Extinction Operator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 69, 1909–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordo, S. (1987). The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Bordo, S. (1989). The View from Nowhere and the Dream of Everywhere: Heterogeneity, Adequation and Feminist Theory. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy, 88(2), 19–25.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. (1980). The Current Status of Scientific Realism. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Boyle, R. (1744). The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle. London.Google Scholar

Brandon, R. N. (1978). Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 9 (3), 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandon, R. N. (1981a). Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 12 (2), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandon, R. N. (1981b). A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory. Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 427–439.Google Scholar

Brandon, R. N. (1982). The Levels of Selection. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982, 1, 315–23.Google Scholar

Brandon, R. N. (1985). Adaptation Explanations: Are Adaptations for the Good of Replicators or Interactors? In Depew, D. and Weber, B. (Eds.), Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science (pp. 81–96). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.Google Scholar

Brandon. R. N. (1988). Levels of Selection: A Hierarchy of Interactors. In Plotkin, H. C. (Ed.), The Role of Behavior in Evolution (pp. 51–71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brandon, R. N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bruck, D. (1957). Male Segregation Ratio Advantage as a Factor in Maintaining Lethal Alleles in Wild Populations of House Mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 43, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bum, E. A. (1932). The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar

Burian, R. M. (1983). Adaptation. In Greene, M. (Ed.), Dimensions of Darwinism (pp. 287–314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Butts, R. E. (1977). Consilience of Inductions and the Problem of Conceptual Change in Science. In Logic, Laws and Life. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Callebaut, W. (Ed.) (1993). The Naturalistic Turn: How Real Philosophy of Science Is Done. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (1967). Human Evolution: An Introduction to Man's Adaptations. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Caplan, A. L. (1981). The Concept of Health and Disease. In Veatch, R. M., (Ed.) Medical Ethics (pp. 49–62). Boston: Jones & Bartlett.Google ScholarPubMed

Carnap, R. (1928). Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin-Schlachtensee: Weltkreis-Verlag.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1956). Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1967). The Logical Structure of the World: Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, N. (1990). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cassidy, J. (1978). Philosophical Aspects of the Group Selection Controversy. Philosophy of Science, 45, 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cat, J. (1998). The Physicists' Debates on Unification in Physics at the End of the 29th Century. Historical Studies of the Physical Sciences, 28 (2), 253–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cat, J. (2000). Must Microcausality Condition Be Interpreted Causally? Beyond Reduction and Matters of Fact. Theoria, 37, 59–85.Google Scholar

Cat, J. (forthcoming). Physics Beyond Laws & Theories: The Limits of Unity, Universality and Precision. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Cheetham, A. H. (1986). Tempo of Evolution in a Neogene Bryozoan: Rates of Morphologic Change Within and Across Species Boundaries. Paleobiology, 12, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, P. W., and K. J. Holyoak (1983). Schema-Based Inferences in Deductive Reasoning. Anaheim, 25th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.

Cheng, P. W., and K. J. Holyoak (1984). Pragmatic Schemas for Deductive Reasoning. San Antonio, 25th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society.

Cheng, P. W., and Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. et al. (1986). Pragmatic Versus Syntactic Approaches to Training Deductive Reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cheng, P. W., and Holyoak, K. J. (1989). On the Natural Selection of Reasoning Theories. Cognition, 33, 285–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1974). Male-Female, Female-Female, and Male-Male Sexual Behavior in the Stumptail Monkey, with Special Attention to the Female Orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3(2), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1976). Homosexual Behavior in a Laboratory Group of Stumptail Monkeys (Macaca Arctoides): Forms, Contexts, and Possible Social Functions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5(6), 511–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. (1989). A Neurocomputational Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S. (1993). Can Neurobiology Teach Us Anything about Consciousness?Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, 67(4), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Code, L. (1993). Taking Subjectivity into Account. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 15–48). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Colwell, R. K. (1981). Evolution of Female-Based Sex Ratios: The Essential Role of Group Selection. Nature, 290: 401–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conkey, M. W. (1984). Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 1–38.Google Scholar

Conkey, M. W., and S. H. Williams (1991). Original Narratives: The Political Economy of Gender in Archaeology. In Leonardo, M. di (Ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, W. S. (1984). Expected Time to Extinction and the Concept of Fundamental Fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 107, 603–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby (1987). From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link. In Dupre, J. (Ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality (pp. 277–306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby (1995). Beyond Intuition and Instinct Blindness: Toward an Evolu-tionary Rigorous Cognitive Science. In Mehler, J. and Franck, S. (Eds.), Cognition on Cognition (pp. 69–105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cosmides, L. (1985). Deduction or Darwinian Algorithms?: An Explanation of the “Elusive” Content Effect on the Wason Selection Task. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.

Cosmides, L. (1989). The Logic of Social Exchange: Has Natural Selection Shaped How Humans Reason? Studies with the Wason Selection Task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Council for Responsible Genetics. (1990). Position Paper on Human Genome Initiative. Boston: Committee for Responsible Genetics.

Craig, D. M. (1982). Group Selection versus Individual Selection: An Experimental Analysis. Evolution, 36, 271–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cranor, C. F. (1994). Genetic Causation. In Cranor, C. F., (Ed.), Are Genes Us? (pp. 125–141). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Crook, J. H. (1972). Sexual Selection, Dimorphism, and Social Organization in the Primates. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Cronin, H. (1991). The Peacock's Tail. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crow, J. F., and Aoki, K. (1982). Group Selection for a Polygenetic Behavioral Trait: A Differential Proliferation Model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 79, 2628–2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crow, J. F., and Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Culliton, B. J. (1990). Mapping Terra Incognita (Humani Corporis). Science, 250, 211.Google Scholar

Curley, E. (1972). Locke, Boyle, and the Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities. Philosophical Review, 81, 438–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, E. (1978). Descartes against the Skeptics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damuth, J., and Heisler, I. L. (1988). Alternative Formulations of Multilevel Selection. Biology and Philosophy, 3, 407–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darden, L., and Maull, N. (1977). Interfield Theories. Philosophy of Science, 44(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darlington, C. D. (1939). The Evolution of Genetic Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1903). More Letters of Charles Darwin (Darwin, Francis, Ed.). New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1919). Life and Letters of Charles Darwin (Darwin, Francis, Ed.). New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1964). On the Origin of Species (1st edition facsimile). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1967). Darwin and Henslow: The Growth of an Idea (Barlow, Nora, Ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Daston, L. (1992). Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective. Social Studies of Science, 22, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, L., and Galison, P. (1992). The Image of Objectivity. Representations, 40, 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davenport, W. (1977). Sex in Cross-Cultural Perspective. In Beach, F. (Ed.), Human Sexuality in Four Perspectives (pp. 115–163). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1967). Truth and Meaning. Synthese, 17, 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. (1974). The Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, B. D. (1990). The Human Genome and Other Initiatives. Science, 249, 342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dawkins, R. (1978). Replicator Selection and the Extended Phenotype. Zeitschrill fur Tierpsychologie, 47, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dawkins, R. (1982a). Replicators and Vehicles. In King's College Sociobiology Group, Cambridge, Current Problems in Sociobiology (pp. 45–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1982b). The Extended Phenotype. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1989a). The evolution of evolvability. In Langdon, C. (Ed.), Artificial Life, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity (pp. 201–220). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1989b). The Selfish Gene, Revised Edition. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Peacemaking among Primates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Waal, F. B. M. (1991a). The Chimpanzee's Sense of Social Regularity and Its Relation to the Human Sense of Justice. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(3), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waal, F. B. M. (1991b). Complementary Methods and Convergent Evidence in the Study of Primate Social Cognition. Behaviour, 118, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waal, F. B. M., and Harcourt, A. H. (Eds). (1992). Coalitions and Alliances in Humans and Other Animals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waal, F B. M., and Johanowicz, D. L. (1993). Modification of Reconciliation Behavior through Social Experience: An Experiment with Two Macaque Species. Child Development, 64, 897–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waal, F. B. M., and Luttrell, L. M. (1988). Mechanisms of Social Reciprocity in Three Primate Species: Symmetrical Relationship Characteristics or Cognition?Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. (1978a). Brainstorms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1978b). Current Issues in the Philosophy of Mind. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(4), 249–261.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1988). Quining Qualia. In Marcel, A. J. and Bisiach, E. (Eds.), Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Clarendon, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and Nature. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty. New York: Minton, Balch.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. M. (1969). Avifaunal Equilibria and Species Turnover Rates on the Channel Islands of California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 64, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dobzhansky, T. (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1956). What Is an Adaptive Trait?American Naturalist, 40(855), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1968). Adaptedness and Fitness. In Lewontin, R. C. (Ed.), Population Biology and Evolution, (p. 109–21). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A., and Reeve, H. K. (1994). Behavioral Ecology and Levels of Selection: Dissolving the Group Selection Controversy. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 23, 101–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulbecco, R. (1986). A Turning Point in Cancer Research: Sequencing the Human Genome. Science, 231, 1055–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1982). Adaptation, Fitness and the Evolutionary Tautology. In King's College Sociobiology Group, Cambridge, Current Problems in Sociobiology (pp. 9–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dupre, J. (1983). The Disunity of Science. Mind, 92, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dupre, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Duran, J. (1991). Toward a Feminist Epistemology. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Economist. (1993). Review of The Adapted Mind. 326, 82.

Eldredge, N. (1971). The Allopatric Model and Phylogeny in Paleozoic Invertebrates. Evolution, 25, 156–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eldredge, N. (1985). Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eldredge, N., and S. J. Gould (1972). Punctuated Equilibrium: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism. In Schopfied, T. J. M., (Ed.), Models in Paleobiology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993). The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough. The Sciences, 33(2), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fedigan, L. (1982). Primate Paradigms. Montreal, Can: Eden.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against Method. London: New Left Bookstore.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (1984). The Natural Ontological Attitude. In Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (1986). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism and the Quantum Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1958). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1987). Interview of M. Foucault: Questions of Method. In After Philosophy: End or Transformation?Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. W., and MacMahon, J. A. (1982). Selective Extinction and Speciation: Their Influence on the Structure and Functioning of Communities and Ecosystems. American Naturalist, 119, 480–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fradkin, P. (1989). Fallout. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, I., and Lewontin, R. C. (1970). Is the Gene the Unit of Selection?Genetics, 65, 707–734.Google ScholarPubMed

Friedman, T. (1989). Progress toward Human Gene Therapy. Science, 244, 1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, T. (1990). The Human Genome Project – Some Implications of Extensive “Reverse Genetic” Medicine [opinion]. American Journal of Human Genetics, 46, 409.Google Scholar

Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. E., Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., and Zellman, G. L. (1978). Women and Sex Roles: A Social Psychological Perspective. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Fujimara, J. (1998). The Molecular Biological Bandwagon in Cancer Research: Where Social Worlds Meet. Social Problems, 35, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gajdusek, D. C. (1970). Physiological and Psychological Characteristics of Stone Age Man. Engineering and Science, 22, 56–62.Google Scholar

Gallup, G. G., and Suarez, S. D. (1983). Optimal Reproductive Strategies for Bipedalism. Journal of Human Evolution, 12, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garber, D. (1978). Science and Certainty in Descartes. In Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Garber, D. (1992). Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Garber, D. (1993). Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and Essays. In Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1990, November 8). A Lab of One's Own. NY Review of Books, 37.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Giere, R. (1985). Constructive Realism. In Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A. (Eds.), Images of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., and Hug, K. (1992). Domain-Specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating, and Perspective Change. Cognition, 43, 127–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilinsky, N. (1986). Species Selection as a Causal Process. Evolutionary Biology, 20, 248–273.Google Scholar

Glennan, S. (2002). Contextual Unanimity and the Units of Selection Problem. Philosophy of Science, 69(1), 118–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glymour, B. (1999). Population Level Causation and a Unified Theory of Natural Selection. Biology and Philosophy, 14(4), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P. (1992). Additivity and the Units of Selection. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1992 Vol 1, 315–328.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P., and Kerr, B. (2002). Group Fitness and Multi-Level Selection: Replies to Commentaries. Biology and Philosophy, 17(4), 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, P., and Lewontin, R. (1993). The Dimensions of Selection. Philosophy of Science, 60, 373–395.Google Scholar

Goldfoot, D., Westerborg-van Loon, J., Groeneveld, W., and Slob, A. Koos (1980). Behavioral and Physiological Evidence of Sexual Climax in the Female Stump-Tailed Macaque (Macaca Arctoides). Science, 208, 1477–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, J. C., J. J. McCarthy, and D. G. Peavey (1979). Growth Rate Influence the Chemical Composition of Phytoplankton in Oceanic Matters. Nature, 279, 210–215.

Goldman, J. C., C. D. Taylor, and P. M. Glibert (1981). Nonlinear Time-Course Uptake of Carbon and Ammonium by Marine Phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 137–148.

Gollin, E. S., Stahl, G., and Morgan, E. (1989). On the Uses of the Concept of Normality in Developmental Biology and Psychology. Advances in Child Development Behavior, 21, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goodnight, C. J., and Stevens, L. (1997). Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell Us about Group Selection in Nature?The American Naturalist, 150, S 59–S79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gould, S. J. (1982). The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and Its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution. In Milkman, R. (Ed.), Perspectives in Evolution (pp. 83–104). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1983). The Meaning of Punctuated Equilibrium and Its Role in Validating a Hierarchical Approach to Macroevolution. In Milkman, R. (Ed.), Perspectives in Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1987). Freudian Slip. Natural History (Feb), 14–21.Google ScholarPubMed

Gould, S. J. (1989). Punctuated Equilibrium in Fact and Theory. Journal of Social Biology Structure, 12, 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (2002). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3, 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205, 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grene, M. (1985). Descartes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Grene, M. (1991). Descartes among the Scholastics. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Griesemer, J. R. (2005). The Informational Gene and the Substantial Body: On the Generalization of Evolutionary Theory by Abstraction. In Cartwright, N. and Jones, M. (Eds.), Idealization XII: Correcting the Model, Idealization and Abstraction in the Sciences (pp. 59–115). Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, vol 86. Amsterdam: Rodopi Publishers.Google Scholar

Griesemer, J. (2000). Development, Culture and the Units of Inheritance. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings), 67, S348-S368.Google Scholar

Griesemer, J. R., and Wade, M. J. (1988). Laboratory Models, Causal Explanation, and Group Selection. Biology and Philosophy, 3, 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griesemer, J. R., and W. Wimsatt (1989). Picturing Weismannism: A Case Study of Conceptual Evolution. In Ruse, M. (Ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is, Essays for David Hull (pp. 75–137). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, P., and Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. (1988). Philosophers of Experiment. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Hafez, E. S. E. (1971). Reproductive Cycles. In Hafez, E. S. E. (Ed.), Comparative Reproduction of Non-human Primates. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The Causes of Evolution. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. (1967). Extraordinary Sex Ratios. Science, 156, 477–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamilton, W. D. (1975). Innate Social Aptitudes in Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics. In Fox, R. (Ed.), Biosocial Anthropology (pp. 133–55). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. D., Axelrod, R., and Tanese, R. (1990). Sexual Reproduction as an Adaptation to Resist Parasites (A Review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 87, 3566–3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampe, M., and Morgan, S. R. (1988). Two Consequences of Richard Dawkins' View of Genes and Organisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 19, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, T. A. (1978). Larval Dispersal and Species Longevity in Lower Tertiary Gastropods. Science, 199, 885–887.

Hansen, T. A. (1980). Influence of Larval Dispersal and Geographic Distribution on Species Longevity in Neogastropods. Paleobiology, 8, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, D. (1989). Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (1991). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1989). Why “Physics” is a Bad Model for Physics. In The End of Science? Attack and Defense (25th Nobel Conference, 1989). Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1992). After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics, and “Strong Objectivity.” Social Research, 59(3), 567–587.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993a). The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1993b). Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is Strong Objectivity? In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 49–82), New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1995). Strong Objectivity: A Response to the New Objectivity Question. Synthese, 104(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, G. (1965). The Inference to the Best Explanation. Philosophical Review, 74, 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, G. (1968). Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 5, 164–173.Google Scholar

Haskell, T. (1990). Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Rhetoric vs. Practice in Peter Novick's That Noble Dream. History and Theory, 29, 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslanger, S. (1993). On Being Objective and Being Objectified. In Antony, L. and Witt, C. (Eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Heisler, I. L., and Damuth, J. (1988). A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured Populations. American Naturalist, 130, 582–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herschel, J. F. W. (1831). A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy.London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesse, M. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Inference. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hesse, M. (1988). Socializing Epistemology. In McMullin, E. (Ed.), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Hite, S. (1976). The Hite Report. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1651, 1962). Leviathan, (Ed. Oakeshott, M.). London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hobbes. T. (1839 ff.). Works (Ed. Molesworth, ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Holden, C. (1991). Probing the Complex Genetics of Alcoholism. Science, 251, 163–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holton, G. (1993). Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1986). Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female. In Bleier, R. (Ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Hubbard., R. (1990). The Politics of Women's Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Hubbard, R., Henifen, M. S., and Fried, B. (Eds.). (1982). Biological Woman, the Convenient Myth: A Collection of Feminist Essays and a Comprehensive Bibliography. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar

Hull, D. L. (1980). Individuality and Selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, D. L. (1988a). Interactors versus Vehicles. In Plotkin, H. C. (Ed.), The Role of Behavior in Evolution (pp. 19–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jablonski, D. (1986). Background and Mass Extinctions: The Alternation of Macroevolutionary Regimes. Science, 231, 129–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jablonski, D. (1987). Heritability at the Species Level: Analysis of Geographic Ranges of Cretaceous Mollusks. Science, 238, 360–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jaggar, A., and Bordo, S. (Eds.). (1989). Gender/Body/Knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jukes, T. H. (1988). The Human Genome Project: Labeling Genes. California Monthly, December, 15–17.Google Scholar

Kano, T. (1980). Special Behavior of Wild Pygmy Chimpanzees (Pan Paniscus) of Wambe: A Preliminary Report. Journal of Human Evolution, 9, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kano, T. (1982). The Social Group of Pygmy Chimpanzees of Wamba. Primates, 23(2), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karjala, D. S. (1992). A Legal Research Agenda for the Human Genome Initiative. Jurimetrics, 32, 121–219.Google ScholarPubMed

Kawata, M. (1987). Units and Passages: A View for Evolutionary Biology. Biology and Philosophy, 2, 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kekule, F. A. (1965). Origin of the Benzene and Structural Theory. Chemistry, 38.Google Scholar

Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Keller, E. F., and Lloyd, E. A. (1992). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kerr, B., and Godfrey-Smith, P. (2002). Individualist and Multi-Level Perspectives on Selection in Structured Populations. Biology and Philosophy, 17(4), 477–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimura, M., and Ohta, T. (1971). Theoretical Aspects of Population Genetics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Kinsey, A. C., et al. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, M. (1987). Sexual Selection by Female Choice in Polygynous Animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 187, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science, 48, 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P., Sterelny, K., and Waters, K. (1990). The Illusory Riches of Sober's Monism. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 158–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koruda, S. (1980). Social Behavior of the Pygmy Chimpanzees. Primates, 21(2), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krimbas, C. B. (1984). On Adaptation, Neo-Darwinian Tautology, and Population Fitness. Evolutionary Biology, 17, 1–57.

Kuhn., T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1992). The Trouble with the Historical Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: Dept. of the History of Science, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Lande, R. (1980). Sexual Dimorphism, Sexual Selection, and Adaptation in Polygenic Characters. Evolution, 34(2), 292–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lande, R., and Arnold, S. J. (1983). The Measurement of Selection on Correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (1971). William Whewell on the Consilience of Inductions. Monist, 55, 368–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, L. (1981). A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science, 48, 19–49. Reprinted in Leplin, J. (Ed.), Scientific Realism (pp. 218–249). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Leacock, E. B. (1977). Women in Egalitarian Societies. In Becoming Visible: Women in European History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Leacock, E. B. (1978a). Structuralism and Dialectics. Reviews in Anthropology, 5(1), 17–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leacock, E. B. (1978b). Society and Gender. In Genes and Gender. New York: Guardian Press.Google Scholar

Leacock, E. B. (1981). History, Development, and the Division of Labor by Sex: Implications for Organization. Signs, 7(2), 474–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leacock, E. B., and Safa, H. I. (1986). Women's Work: Development and the Division of Labor. South Hadley, MA: Gender, Bergin & Garve.Google Scholar

Leacock, E. B., and Nash, J. (1977). Ideologies of Sex: Archetypes and Stereotypes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 285, 618–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leigh, E. G. (1977). How Does Selection Reconcile Individual Advantage with the Good of the Group?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 74, 4542–4546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levay, S. (1991). A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure between Homosexual and Heterosexual Men. Science, 253, 1034–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, M. (1988). Caring New Science: Feminism and Science. American Scholar, 57 (Winter).Google Scholar

Levin, B. R., and Kilmer, W. L. (1974). Interdemic Selection and the Evolution of Altruism: A Computer Simulation Study. Evolution, 28, 527–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Levins, R., and Lewontin, R. C. (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1956). The Family. In Shapiro, H. L. (Ed.), Man, Culture, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969). The Elementary Structure of Kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. (1958). Cold Spring Harbor Symposium of Quantitative Biology 22, 395–408.

Lewontin, R. C. (1958). A General Method for Investigating the Equilibrium of Gene Frequency in a Population. Genetics, 43, 421–433.Google ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. C. (1962). Interdeme Selection Controlling a Polymorphism in the House Mouse. The American Naturalist, 46(887), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1967). The Principle of Historicity in Evolution. In Moorehead, P. S. and Kaplan, M. M. (Eds.), Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution (pp. 81–88). Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1970). The Units of Selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1, 1–18.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C. (1978). Adaptation. Scientific American, 239, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. C. (1985). Adaptation. In Levins, R. and Lewontin, R. C. (Eds.), The Dialectical Biologist (pp. 65–84). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Originally published as “Adattamento” in Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. 1. Turin, 1977.Google Scholar

Lewontin., R. C. (1990). Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. C., and Dunn, L. C. (1960). The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse. Genetics, 45, 701–722.Google ScholarPubMed

Li, C. C. (1967). Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection. Nature, 214, 505–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lloyd, E. (1983) A Semantic Approach to the Structure of Population Genetics. Philosophy of Science, 51, 242–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, E. (1983). The Nature of Darwin's Support for the Theory of Natural Selection. Philosophy of Science, 50, 112–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, E. (1986a). Thinking about Models in Evolutionary Theory. Philosophica, 37, 87–100.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. (1986b). Empirical Evaluation of Group Selection Debates. Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, Vol. I, 1986. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1986c). Evaluation of Evidence in Group Selection Debates. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986, 1, 483–493.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1988/1994). The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Paperback edition with new preface, Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1989). A Structural Approach to Defining Units of Selection. Philosophy of Science, 56, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1992). Unit of Selection. In Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (Eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (pp. 334–340). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1993). Pre-Theoretical Assumptions in Evolutionary Explanations of Female Sexuality. Philosophical Studies, 69, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1995). Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies. Synthese, 104 (September), 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (1999). Altruism Revisited. Review of Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, by Sober, Elliott and Wilson, David S.. Quarterly Review of Biology, 74(4), 447–449.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. A. (2001). Units and Levels of Selection: An Anatomy of the Units of Selection Debates. In Singh, Rama S., Krimbas, Costas B., Paul, Diane B., Beatty, John (Eds.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives, Volume Two (pp. 267–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. A., and Gould, S. J. (1993). Species Selection on Variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 90, 595–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lloyd, E. A., R. C. Lewontin, and M. Feldman (2006). The Generational Cycle of State Spaces and Adequate Genetical Representation. Manuscript.

Locke. J. (1694, 1959). Essay Concerning Human Understanding (2nd edition). Ed. Fraser, A. C.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Longino, H. (1995). Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues. Synthese, 104(3), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, H. E. (1979). Evidence and Hypothesis: An Analysis of Evidential Relations. Philosophy of Science, 46, 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, H. E. (1993a). Subjects, Power, and Knowledge: Description and Prescription in Feminist Philosophies of Science. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 101–120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Longino, H. E. (1993b). The Essential Tensions – Phase Two: Feminist. Philosophical and Social Studies of Science. In Antony, L. and Witt, C. (Eds.), A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Longino, H. E., and Doell, R. (1983). Body, Bias and Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Reasoning in Two Areas of Biological Science. Signs, 9, 206–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O. (1963). An Equilibrium Theory of Insular Zoogeography. Evolution, 17, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, E. O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1974). The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Clarendon, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1976). Problems from Locke. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, W. H., and V. Johnson (1961). Orgasm, Anatomy of the Female. In Ellis, A. and Abarbanal, A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Sexual Behavior, Vol. II. New York: Hawthorn.Google Scholar

Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. (1966). Human Sexual Response. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Matessi, C., and Jayakar, S. D. (1976). Conditions for the Evolution of Altruism under Darwinian Selection. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 360–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maynard, Smith J. (1964). Group Selection and Kin Selection: A Rejoinder. Nature, 201, 1145–1147.Google Scholar

Maynard, Smith J. (1968). Mathematical Ideas in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard, Smith J. (1976). Group Selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51, 277–283.Google Scholar

Maynard, Smith J. (1978). The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard, Smith J. (1981). The Evolution of Social Behavior and Classification of Models. In Kings College Sociobiology Group (Eds.), Current Problems in Sociobiology (pp. 29–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1984). The Population as a Unit of Selection. In Shorrocks, B. (Ed.), Evolutionary Ecology, 23rd British Ecological Society Symposium (pp. 195–202). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1987). Evolutionary Progress and Levels of Selection. In Dupre, J. (Ed.), The Latest on the Best. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mayo, D., and Gilinsky, N. (1987) Philosophy of Science, 54, 515–538.CrossRef

Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayr, E. (1967). Evolutionary Challenges to the Mathematical Interpretation of Evolution. In Moorehead, P. S. and Kaplan, M. M. (Eds.), Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution (pp. 47–54). Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1976). Evolution and the Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1978). Evolution. Scientific American, 239, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayr, E. (1982a). Adaptation and Selection. Biologisches Zentralblatt, 101, 161–174.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1982b). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1983). How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Program?American Naturalist, 121, 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, J. (1979). Virtue and Reason. Monist, 62, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, J. (1988). Values and Secondary Qualities. In Sayre-McCord, G. (Ed.), Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

McKusick, V. A. (1989). Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome. New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 910–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McMullin, E. (Ed.). (1988a). Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

McMullin, E. (1988b). Panel Discussion. In McMullin, E. (Ed.), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Michod, R. (1999). Darwinian Dynamics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Michod, R., and Levin, B. (Eds.). (1988). The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1859, 1989). On Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F., and Todd, P. M. (1994). A Bottom-Up Approach with a Clear View of the Top: How Evolutionary Psychology Can Inform Adaptive Behavior Research. Adaptive Behavior, 3(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, S. (1987). Competing Units of Selection? A Case of Symbiosis. Philosophy of Science, 54, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mithin, S. (Spring 1997). Review of The Adapted Mind. Journal of Anthropological Research, 53, 100–102.Google Scholar

Mori, A. (1984). An Ethological Study of Pygmy Chimpanzees in Wambe Zaire: A Comparison with Chimpanzees. Primates, 25(3), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, D. (1967). The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Moulines, C. U. (1975). A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics. Erkenntnis, 9, 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munson, R. (1971). Biological Adaptation. Philosophy of Science, 38, 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, J. P. (1990). Pragmatism: From Peirce to Davidson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1980). The Limits of Objectivity. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (pp. 77–139). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1993, March 4). The Mind Wins! Review of J. R. Searle's The Rediscovery of the Mind. New York Review of Books, 37–41.

Nelson, L. H. (1990). Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, L. H. (1993). Epistemological Communities. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 121–160). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1726, 1972). Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (3rd edition). Koyre, A. and Cohen, I. B. (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nicholson, A. J. (1960). The Role of Population Dynamics in Natural Selection. In Tax, D. (Ed.), Evolution After Darwin: The Evolution of Life (pp. 477–522). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. (1887, 1967). On the Genealogy of Morals & Ecco Homo. New York: Vintage Books, Random House.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., and Cheng, P. W. (1988). Conditional Reasoning. 29th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., Fong, G. T., Lehman, D., and Cheng, P. W. (1987). Teaching Reasoning. Science, 238, 625–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Novick, P. (1988). That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowotny, H., and Rose, H. (Eds.). (1979). Counter-Movements in the Sciences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunney, L. (1985). Group Selection, Altruism, and Structured-Deme Models. American Naturalist, 126, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohm, K. (1983). Hierarchical Theory of Selection: The Covariance Formula of Selection and Its Application. Bulletin of the Biometrical Society of Japan, 4, 25–33.Google Scholar

Okasha, S. (2004). Multilevel Selection and the Partitioning of Covariance: A Comparison of Three Approaches. Evolution, 58(3), 486–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oster, G. F., and Wilson, E. O. (1978). Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Peirce, C. S. (1868, 1992). Some Consequences of Four Incapacities. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 140–157. Reprinted in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1871, 1992). Review of Fraser's The Works of George Berkeley. North American Review, 113, 449–472. Reprinted in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce. C. S. (1877, 1992). The Fixation of Belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1–15. Reprinted in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1878a, 1992). How to Make our Ideas Clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302. Reprinted in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1878b, 1992). The Order of Nature. Popular Science Monthly, 13, 203–217. Reprinted in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1892, 1992). The Doctrine of Necessity Examined. The Monist, 2, 321–327. Reprinted in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (Eds.), The Essential Peirce Vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Perutz, M. F. (1995, December 21).The Pioneer Defended. Review of Gerald L. Geison's The Private Science of Louis Pasteur (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). New York Review of Books, XⅬII (20).Google Scholar

Pfeifer, E. J. (1972). United States. In Glick, (Ed.), The Comparative Reception of Darwinism (pp. 185–210). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, S., and Bloom, P. (1990). Natural Language and Natural Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784. Reprinted (1992) in Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (Eds.), The Adapted Mind, pp. 451–493.

Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong Inference. Science, 146, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Polanyi, M. (1969a). The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. In Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1969b). The Structure of Consciousness. In Knowing and Being: Essays by Michael Polanyi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Potter, E. (1993). Gender and Epistemic Negotiation. In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (Eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 161–186). Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Price, G. R. (1972). Extension of Covariance Selection Mathematics. Annals of Human Genetics, 35, 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Proctor, R. (1991). Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pugh, G. (1977). Biological Origins of Human Values. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1992). Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1963). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View (Revised Edition) (pp. 20–46). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1969). Epistemology Naturalized. In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1974). The Roots of Reference. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1981). Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Quinn, J. F., and Dunham, A. E. (1983). On Hypothesis Testing in Ecology and Evolution. American Naturalist, 122, 602–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ranelagh, J. (1986). The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Reid, J. P. (1970). A Law of Blood: The Primitive Law of the Cherokee Nation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Reiter, R. R. (Ed.). (1975). Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Rescher, N. (1978). Peirce's Philosophy of Science: Critical Studies in His Theory of Induction and Scientific Method.South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Rescher, N. (1992). A System of Pragmatic Idealism, Vol. I: Human Knowledge. In Idealist Perspective. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Roan, S. (1991, April 18). Check It Out. Oakland Tribune.Google Scholar

Rodis-Lewis, G. (1993). From Metaphysics to Physics: Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1986). Pragmatism, Davidson and Truth. In LePore, E. (Ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1987). Pragmatism and Philosophy. In Baynes, K., Bohman, J., and McCarthy, T. (Eds.), After Philosophy: End or Transformation?Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1988). Is Natural Science a Natural Kind? In McMullin, E. (Ed.), Construction and Constraint: The Shaping of Scientific Rationality. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, H. (1983). Hand, Brain and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences. Signs, 9, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roughgarden, J. (1983). Competition and Theory in Community Ecology. American Naturalist, 122, 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Rudwick, M. J. S. (1976). The Meaning of Fossils (2nd ed.). New York: Neale Watson Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (1975a). Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution: An Analysis. Journal of the History of Biology, 8(2), 219–241.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (1975b). Darwin's Debt to Philosophy. Studies in the History and Philosophy ofScience, 6(2), 159–181.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (1979). The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (1981). Is Science Sexist? And Other Problems in the Biomedical Sciences. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sarkar, S. (1994). The Selection of Alleles and the Additivity of Variance. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1994, Vol. One, 3–12.Google Scholar

Scheffler, I. (1967). Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1993). Rationality and Realism: What Is at Stake?Daedalus, 122(4), 55–84.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, P. (1973). Illness – Mental and Otherwise. Hastings Center Report, 1, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sellars. W. (1968). Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. London: International Library of Philosophy and Scientific Method, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Shanahan, T. (1997). Pluralism, Antirealism, and the Units of Selection. Acta Biotheoretica, 45, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapere, D. (1981). Meaning and Scientific Change. In Hacking, Ian (Ed.), Scientific Revolutions (pp. 28–59). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S.. (1985). Leviathan and the Air Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shepard, R. N. (1987). Evolution of a Mesh between Principles of the Mind and Regularities of the World. In Dupre, J. (Ed.), The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Shimony, A. (1970). Scientific Inference. In Colodny, R. (Ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Simberloff, D. (1983). Competition Theory, Hypothesis Testing, and Other Community Ecological Buzzwords. American Naturalist, 122, 625–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simberloff, D., and Wilson, E. O. (1969). Experimental Zoogeography of Islands: The Colonization of Empty Islands. Ecology, 50, 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simberloff, D., and Wilson, E. O. (1970). Experimental Zoogeography of Islands: A Two-Year Record of Colonization. Ecology, 51, 934–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simpson, G. G. (1953). The Major Features of Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Singer, I., and Singer, J. (1972). Periodicity of Sexual Desire in Relation to Time of Ovulation in Women. Journal of Biosocial Science, 4, 471–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siskind, J. (1978). Kinship and Mode of Production. American Anthropologist, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slatkin, M. (1972). On Treating the Chromosome as the Unit of Selection. Genetics, 72, 157–168.Google ScholarPubMed

Slatkin, M. (1981). A Diffusion Model of Species Selection. Paleobiology, 7(4), 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slatkin, M., and Wade, M. (1978). Group Selection on a Quantitative Character. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 75, 3531–3534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Slobodkin, L. B., and Rapoport, A. (1974). An Optimal Strategy of Evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, 49, 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. (1963). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Smith, L., and Hood, L. (1987). Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome: How to Proceed. Biotechnology, 5, 933–939.Google Scholar

Sneed, J. (1971). The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E. (1981). Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980, 2, 93–121.Google Scholar

Sober, E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sober, E. (1990). The Poverty of Pluralism: A Reply to Sterelny and Kitcher. The Journal of Philosophy, 87(3),151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E., and Lewontin, R. C. (1982). Artifact, Cause and Genic Selection. Philosophy of Science, 49, 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E., and Wilson, D. S. (1994). A Critical Review of Philosophical Work on the Units of Selection Problem. Philosophy of Science, 61, 534–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, E., and Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Spencer, H. G. (2001). Optimization, Limitations of. In Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Spencer, H., and J. Masters (1992). Sexual Selection: Contemporary Debates. In Keller, E. F. and Lloyd, E. A. (Eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stanford, P. K. (2001). The Units of Selection and the Causal Structure of the World. Erkenntnis, 54, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, S., and Yang, X. (1987). Approximate Evolutionary Stasis for Bivalve Morphology Over Millions of Years: A Multivariate, Multilineage Study. Paleobiology, 13, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, S. (1975a). Clades versus Clones in Evolution: Why We Have Sex. Science, 190, 382–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, S. (1975b). A Theory of Evolution above the Species Level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 72(2), 646–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, S. (1979). Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Starfield, A. M., et al. (1980). An Exploratory Model of Impala Population Dynamics. In Levin, S. (Ed.), Mathematical Modelling in Biology and Ecology, Vol. 33 of Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Stegmuller, W. (1976). The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, H. (1993). On Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century. In French, P., Uehling, T. Jr., and Wettstein, H. (Eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Volume XVIII: Philosophy of Science, pp. 177–201.

Sterelny, K., and Kitcher, P. (1988). The Return of the Gene. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stich, S. (1983). From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. (1959). Individuals. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strong, D. R. (1983). Natural Variability and the Manifold Mechanisms of Ecological Communities. American Naturalist, 122, 636–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, B. (1980). Berkeley v. Locke on Primary Qualities. Philosophy, 55, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud., B. (1984). The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strum, S. (1987). Almost Human: A Journey into the World of Baboons. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Suppe, F. (1972). What's Wrong with the Received View on the Structure of Scientific Theories?Philosophy of Science, 39, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suppe, F. (1973). Theories, Their Formulations, and the Operational Imperative. Synthese, 25, 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suppe, F. (1974). Theories and Phenomena. In Leinfellner, W. and Kohler, E. (Eds.), Developments of the Methodology of Social Science (pp. 45–92). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suppe, F. (1974a). Some Philosophical Problems in Biological Speciation and Taxonomy. In Wojcieckowski, (Ed.), Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge (pp. 190–243). Munich: Verlag Dokumentation.Google Scholar

Suppe, F. (1976). Theoretical Laws. In Przelecki, M. et al. (Eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences (pp. 247–267). Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suppe, F. (Ed.) (1977). The Structure of Scientific Theories (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Suppe, F. (1979). Theory Structure. In Current Research in Philosophy of Science (pp. 317–338). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to Logic. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand and Co.Google Scholar

Suppes, P. (1961). A Comparison of the Meaning and Use of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences. In Freudenthal, H. (Ed.), The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences (pp. 163–177). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suppes, P. (1962). Models of Data. In Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A. (Eds.), Logic, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, Vol. 1 (pp. 252–261). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Suppes, P. (1967). What Is a Scientific Theory? In Morgenbesser, S. (Ed.), Philosophy of Science Today. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar

Suppes, P. (1978). The Plurality of Science. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar

Symons, D. (1987). If We're All Darwinians, What's the Fuss About? In Crawford, C., Krebs, D., and Smith, M. (Eds.), Sociobiology and Psychology.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Teller, P. (1992). Subjectivity and Knowing What It's Like: Emergence or Reduction? In J. Kim (Ed.), Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. Berlin, GR: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Temkin, O. (1977). The Double Face of Janus. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Thagard, P. (1978). The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice. Journal of Philosophy, 75, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Thoday, J. M. (1953). Components of Fitness. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, 7, 96–113.Google Scholar

Thompson, P. (1983). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: a Semantic Approach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 14, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, P. (1985). Sociobiological Explanation and the Testability of Sociobiological Theory. In Fetzer, James H. (Ed.), Sociobiology and Epistemology. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toft, C. A., and Shea, P. J. (1983). Detecting Communitywide Patterns: Estimating Power Strengthens Statistical Inference. American Naturalist, 122, 618–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tooby, J. (1985). The Emergence of Evolutionary Psychology. In Pines, D. (Ed.), Emerging Syntheses in Science. Proceedings of the Founding Workshops of the Santa Fe Institute (pp. 67–75). Santa Fe, NM: The Santa Fe Institute.Google Scholar

Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1989). Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Part I: Theoretical Considerations. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 29–49. Pt II: Case Study: A Computational Theory of Social Exchange. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1990a). The Past Explains the Present: Emotional Adaptations and the Structure of Ancestral Environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1990b). On the Universality of Human Nature and the Uniqueness of the Individual: The Role of Genetics and Adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides (1992). The Psychological Foundations of Culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (Eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J., and I. DeVore (1987). The Reconstruction of Hominid Behavioral Evolution through Strategic Modeling. In Kinzey, W. G. (Ed.), The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models (pp. 183–237). New York:State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. (1971). The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tuana, N. (Ed.). (1989). Feminism and Science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Tuana, N. (1995). The Values of Science: Empiricism from a Feminist Perspective. Synthese, 104(3), 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, J. (1986). In Raup, D. M. and D. Jablonski, (Eds.), Patterns and Processes in the History of Life (pp. 183–207). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uyenoyama, M. K. (1979). Evolution of Altruism under Group Selection in Large and Small Populations in Fluctuating Environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 15, 58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uyenoyama, M. K., and Feldman, M. W. (1980). Evolution of Altruism under Group Selection in Large and Small Populations in Fluctuating Environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 17, 380–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steen, W. J. and Berg, H. A. (1999). Dissolving Disputes over Genic Selectionism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 184–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. (1969). Meaning Relations and Modalities. Nous, 3, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. (1970). On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories. Philosophy of Science, 37, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. (1972). A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science. In Colodny, R. E. (Ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

van Fraassen, B. C. (1974). The Labyrinth of Quantum Logic. In Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (Eds.), Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol XIII. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraassen, B. C. (1986). Aim and Structure of Scientific Theories. In R. B. Marcus, G. Dorn, and P. Weingartner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (pp. 397–318). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vehrencamp, S. L., and J. W. Bradbury (1984). Mating Systems and Ecology. In Krebs, J. R. (Ed.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (pp. 251–278). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Vicedo, M. (MS, 1991). The History, Scientific Value, and Social Implications of the Human Genome Project.

Voss, S. (Ed.) (1993). Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vrba, E. (1980). Evolution, Species and Fossils: How Does Life Evolve?South African Journal of Science, 76, 61–84.Google Scholar

Vrba, E. (1983). Macroevolutionary Trends: New Perspectives on the Roles of Adaptation and Incidental Effect. Science, 221, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vrba, E. (1984). What Is Species Selection?Systematic Zoology, 33, 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vrba, E. (1989). Levels of Selection and Sorting with Special Reference to the Species Level. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 6, 111–168.Google Scholar

Vrba, E., and Eldredge, N. (1984). Individuals, Hierarchies and Processes: Towards a More Complete Evolutionary Theory. Paleobiology, 10, 146–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vrba, E., and Gould, S. J. (1986). The Hierarchical Expansion of Sorting and Selection: Sorting and Selection Cannot Be Equated. Paleobiology, 12, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waddington, C. H. (1956). Genetic Assimilation of the Bithorax Phenotype. Evolution, 10, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wade, M. J. (1976). Group Selection Among Laboratory Populations of Tribolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 73(12), 4604–4607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wade, M. J. (1977). An Experimental Study of Group Selection. Evolution, 31, 134–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wade, M. J. (1978). A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 53, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wade, M. J. (1980). Kin Selection: Its Components. Science, 210, 665–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wade, M. J. (1985). Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group Selection. American Naturalist, 125, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wade, M. J., and Breden, F. (1981). The Effect of Inbreeding on the Evolution of Altruistic Behavior by Kin Selection. Evolution, 35, 844–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wade, M. J., and McCauley, D. E. (1980). Group Selection: The Phenotypic and Genotypic Differentiation of Small Populations. Evolution, 34, 799–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Waters, K. (1986). Models of Natural Selection: From Darwin to Dawkins. Ph.D. diss., History and Philosophy of Science Department. Bloomington:Indiana University.Google Scholar

Waters, K. (1991). Tempered Realism About the Force of Selection. Philosophy of Science 58(4), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, J. D. (1990). The Human Genome Project: Past, Present, and Future. Science, 248, 44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wessels, L. (1976). Laws and Meaning Postulates (in van Fraassen's View of Theories). In Cohen, R. S. et al. (Eds.), PSA 1974 (pp. 215–235). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitbeck, C. (1984). A Different Reality: Feminist Ontology. In Gould, C. (Ed.), Beyond Domination: New Perspectives on Women and Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. (1976). Truth, Invention and the Meaning of Life. Proceedings of the British Academy, LXII, 331–378.Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. (1980). What Would Be a Substantial Theory of Math? Philosophical Subjects: Essays Presented to P. F. Strawson. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiggins, D. (1987). Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar