Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T12:09:52.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Ecosystem Functioning Observations for Assessing Conservation in the Doñana National Park, Spain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2018

Allison K. Leidner
Affiliation:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC
Graeme M. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Climate change is predicted to have major repercussions for the preservation of ecosystems and has already led to significant changes in terrestrial productivity and water availability. In order to preserve ecosystems, and the benefits and goods that they provide, managers, decision-makers, and stakeholders require precise and easily accessible information on ecosystem functioning. In Doñana National Park (Spain), we have developed an observatory for producing and transferring information to stakeholders on carbon and water balance based on freely available remote sensing data. The simple and intuitive graphics developed helped managers to gain a synoptic overview of the stability of ecosystems following a perturbation and also assist with monitoring the direct consequences of management practices on vegetation productivity and water demand. The working framework and the tools developed in Doñana National Park are already being incorporated in other protected areas, promoting the ability of additional locations to implement adaptive management strategies, with the goal of mitigating the consequences of climate change on ecosystem integrity.
Type
Chapter
Information
Satellite Remote Sensing for Conservation Action
Case Studies from Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems
, pp. 164 - 193
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcaraz-Segura, D., Cabello, J., Paruelo, J. M., and Delibes, M. (2009). Use of descriptors of ecosystem functioning for monitoring a national park network: a remote sensing approach. Environmental Management, 43, 3848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baettig, M. B., Wild, M., and Imboden, D. M. (2007). A climate change index: where climate change may be most prominent in the 21st century. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, 16.Google Scholar
Baret, F. and Guyot, G. (1991). Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 35, 161173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, P. and Wiman, B. L. (2007). The usefulness of stability concepts in forest management when coping with increasing climate uncertainties. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 541552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brang, P. (2001). Resistance and elasticity: promising concepts for the management of protection forests in the European Alps. Forest Ecology and Management, 145, 107119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabello, J., Fernández, N., Alcaraz-Segura, D., et al. (2012). The ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation: insights from remote sensing. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 32873305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnicer, J., Coll, M., Ninyerola, M., et al. (2011). Widespread crown condition decline, food web disruption, and amplified tree mortality with increased climate change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 14741478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapin, F. S. III, Matson, P. A., and Vitousek, P. (2011). Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., et al. (2003). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437, 529533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity (2010). Decision X/2: the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi biodiversity targets. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Tenth meeting, Nagoya, Japan, 18–29 October.Google Scholar
Costelloe, B., Collen, B., Milner‐Gulland, E. J., et al. (2016). Global biodiversity indicators reflect the modeled impacts of protected area policy change. Conservation Letters, 9, 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, X., Gibbes, C., Southworth, J., and Waylen, P. (2013). Using remote sensing to quantify vegetation change and ecological resilience in a semi-arid system. Land, 2, 108130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dakos, V., Scheffer, M., van Nes, E. H., et al. (2008). Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1430814312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Keersmaecker, W., Lhermitte, S., Honnay, O., et al. (2014). How to measure ecosystem stability? An evaluation of the reliability of stability metrics based on remote sensing time series across the major global ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 20, 21492161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De la Riva, E. G., Lloret, F., Pérez-Ramos, I.M., et al. (2016). The importance of functional diversity in the stability of Mediterranean shrubland communities after the impact of extreme climatic events. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10, 281293.Google Scholar
Del Cacho, M. and Lloret, F. (2012). Resilience of Mediterranean shrubland to a severe drought episode: the role of seed bank and seedling emergence. Plant Biology, 14, 458466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escribano, P., Fernández, N., Oyonarte, C., et al. (2017). Resistance and resilience metrics as tools for managers of protected areas: a remote sensing approach. The 24th MEDECOS and 13th AEET Meeting, Seville, Spain, 31 January–4 February.Google Scholar
Fernández, N., Paruelo, J. M., and Delibes, M. (2010). Ecosystem functioning of protected and altered Mediterranean environments: a remote sensing classification in Doñana, Spain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 211220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, N., Román, J., and Delibes, M. (2016). Variability in primary productivity determines metapopulation dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 20152998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, J. B. (2013). Land-atmosphere interactions: evapotranspiration. In Njoku, E., ed., Encyclopedia of Remote Sensing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 15.Google Scholar
García, M., Fernández, N., Villagarcía, L., et al. (2014). Accuracy of the Temperature–Vegetation Dryness Index using MODIS under water-limited vs. energy-limited evapotranspiration conditions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 149, 100117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, F. (2006). Climate change hot‐spots. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L08707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Díaz-Paniagua, C., and Bustamante, J. (2010). Evidence of hydroperiod shortening in a preserved system of temporary ponds. Remote Sensing, 2, 14391462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouveia, C. M., Trigo, R. M., Beguería, S., and Vicente-Serrano, S. M. (2017). Drought impacts on vegetation activity in the Mediterranean region: an assessment using remote sensing data and multi-scale drought indicators. Global and Planetary Change, 151, 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granier, A., Reichstein, M., Bréda, N., et al. (2007). Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143, 123145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A. J., Alcorlo, P., Peeters, E. T., et al. (2017). Creating a safe operating space for wetlands in a changing climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15, 9910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, V. and Wissel, C. (1997). Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: an inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia, 109, 323334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A., Carr, A. S., and Dash, J. (2014). Remote sensing of vegetation cover dynamics and resilience across southern Africa. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28, 131139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L., He, B., Chen, A., et al. (2016). Drought dominates the interannual variability in global terrestrial net primary production by controlling semi-arid ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 6, 24639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huete, A. (2016). Ecology: vegetation’s responses to climate variability. Nature, 531, 181182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., et al. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83, 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ivits, E., Horion, S., Erhard, M., and Fensholt, R. (2016). Assessing European ecosystem stability to drought in the vegetation growing season. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25, 11311143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krzywinski, M. and Cairo, A. (2013). Points of view: storytelling. Nature Methods, 10, 687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindenmayer, D. B. and Likens, G. E. (2009). Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 482486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloret, F., Keeling, E. G., and Sala, A. (2011). Components of tree resilience: effects of successive low‐growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos, 120, 19091920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Rodríguez, M. D., Castro, H., Arenas, M., et al. (2017). Exploring institutional mechanisms for scientific input into the management cycle of the national protected area network of Peru: gaps and opportunities. Environmental Management, 60 , 10221041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McInerny, G. J., Chen, M., Freeman, R., et al. (2014). Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 148157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteith, J. L. (1965), Evaporation and the environment. Symposium of the Society of Exploratory Biology, 19, 205234.Google Scholar
Moreno, Á., García-Haro, F. J., Martínez, B., and Gilabert, M. A. (2014a). Noise reduction and gap filling of fAPAR time series using an adapted local regression filter. Remote Sensing, 6, 82388260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J., Palomo, I., Escalera, J., Martín-López, B., and Montes, C. (2014b). incorporating ecosystem services into ecosystem-based management to deal with complexity: a participative mental model approach. Landscape Ecology, 29, 14071421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumby, P. J. and Anthony, K. (2015). Resilience metrics to inform ecosystem management under global change with application to coral reefs. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 10881096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagendra, H., Lucas, R., Honrado, J. P., et al. (2013). Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats. Ecological Indicators, 33, 4559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peñuelas, J., Lloret, F., and Montoya, R. (2001). Severe drought effects on Mediterranean woody flora in Spain. Forest Science, 47, 214218.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Ramos, I. M., Díaz‐Delgado, R., Riva, E. G., et al. (2017). Climate variability and community stability in Mediterranean shrublands: the role of functional diversity and soil environment. Journal of Ecology, 105, 13351346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickup, G. and Foran, B. D. (1987). The use of spectral and spatial variability to monitor cover change on inert landscapes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 23, 351363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. See www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Rendón, M. A., Green, A. J., Aguilera, E., and Almaraz, P. (2008). Status, distribution and long-term changes in the waterbird community wintering in Doñana, south–west Spain. Biological Conservation, 141, 13711388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholt, I., Rasmussen, K., and Andersen, J. (2002). A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of surface moisture status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79, 213224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano, L. and Zunzunegui, M. (2008). The relevance of preserving temporary ponds during drought: hydrological and vegetation changes over a 16‐year period in the Doñana National Park (south‐west Spain). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 18, 261279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoniello, T., Lanfredi, M., Liberti, M., Coppola, R., and Macchiato, M. (2008). Estimation of vegetation cover resilience from satellite time series. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 5, 511546.Google Scholar
Soja, A. J., Tchebakova, N. M., French, N. H. F., et al. (2007), Climate induced boreal forest change: predictions versus current observations. Global and Planetary Change, 56, 274296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soriguer, R. C., Rodríguez-Sierra, A., and Domínguez-Nevado, L. (2001). Análisis de la incidencia de los grandes herbívoros en la marisma y vera del Parque Nacional de Doñana. Madrid: Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales.Google Scholar
Van Ruijven, J. and Berendse, F. (2010). Diversity enhances community recovery, but not resistance, after drought. Journal of Ecology, 98, 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbesselt, J., Hyndman, R., Newnham, G., and Culvenor, D. (2010). Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 106115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, A., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Weigelt, A., and Moen, J. (2012). Grassland resistance and resilience after drought depends on management intensity and species richness. PLOS ONE, 7, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washington-Allen, R. A., Ramsey, R. D., West, N. E., and Norton, B. E. (2008). Quantification of the ecological resilience of drylands using digital remote sensing. Ecology and Society, 13, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. E., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., and Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 6773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., and Pulsford, I., eds. (2015). Protected Area Governance and Management. Canberra: ANU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×