The Role of ‘Experts' in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision Makers or Irrelevant Actors?

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139871365

Skip to main content Accessibility help

Home
Books
The Role of ‘Experts' in International and European Decision-Making Processes

The Role of ‘Experts' in International and European Decision-Making Processes

Advisors, Decision Makers or Irrelevant Actors?

- Get access
  
  Buy the print book
  
  Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  
  Log in Register
Cited by 18
Cited by
- 18
Crossref Citations

This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

stbye, Peder 2015. Judging Models in Legal Fact-finding. SSRN Electronic Journal,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Huggins, Anna 2015. The Desirability of Depoliticization: Compliance in the International Climate Regime. Transnational Environmental Law, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 101.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

stbye, Peder 2016. Judicial Review of Regulatory Expert Models. SSRN Electronic Journal ,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

2016. Rethinking Political Risk. p. 127.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Sato, Yasushi and Arimoto, Tateo 2016. Five years after Fukushima: scientific advice in Japan. Palgrave Communications, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Hartley, Sarah 2016. Policy masquerading as science: an examination of non-state actor involvement in European risk assessment policy for genetically modified animals. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 276.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Groux, Gaëlle M. N. Hoffman, Steven J. and Ottersen, Trygve 2018. A Typology of Scientific Advisory Committees. Global Challenges, Vol. 2, Issue. 9, p. 1800004.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Jones, Calvert W. 2019. Adviser to The King: Experts, Rationalization, and Legitimacy. World Politics, Vol. 71, Issue. 1, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

de Graeff, Nienke Jongsma, Karin R. Johnston, Josephine Hartley, Sarah and Bredenoord, Annelien L. 2019. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 374, Issue. 1772, p. 20180106.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Eckert, Sandra 2019. Corporate Power and Regulation. p. 19.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Eckert, Sandra 2019. Corporate Power and Regulation. p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Sullivan, Gavin 2020. The Law of the List.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Hulme, Moira Beauchamp, Gary and Clarke, Linda 2020. Doing advisory work: the role of expert advisers in national reviews of teacher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 44, Issue. 4, p. 498.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Canihac, Hugo 2021. Les savants et les politiques dans la construction de l'Europe. Gouvernement et action publique, Vol. VOL. 10, Issue. 2, p. 37.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Leino-Sandberg, Päivi 2021. The Politics of Legal Expertise in EU Policy-Making.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Longhini, Anna and Zimmerman, Erin 2021. Regional security dialogues in Europe and in Asia: The role of Track 1.5 forums in the practice of international security. European Journal of International Security, Vol. 6, Issue. 4, p. 481.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Abazi, Vigjilenca Adriaensen, Johan and Christiansen, Thomas 2021. The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union. p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Blom, Tannelie 2021. The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union. p. 21.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Edited by Monika Ambrus, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Karin Arts, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Ellen Hey, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Helena Raulus, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Online publication date: September 2014
Print publication year: 2014
Online ISBN: 9781139871365
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871365

Subjects: Public International Law, Law, Politics and International Relations, International Relations and International Organisations

Export citation
Recommend to librarian
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Role of ‘Experts' in International and European Decision-Making Processes
Edited by Monika Ambrus, Karin Arts, Ellen Hey, Helena Raulus
Online ISBN: 9781139871365

Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871365
Your name * Please enter your name

Your email address * Please enter a valid email address.

Who would you like to send this to *

Optional message

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Buy the print book

Information

Contents

Metrics

Experts are increasingly relied on in decision-making processes at international and European levels. Their involvement in those processes, however, is contested. This timely book on the role of 'experts' provides a broad-gauged analysis of the issues raised by their involvement in decision-making processes. The chapters explore three main recurring themes: the rationales for involving experts and ensuing legitimacy problems; the individual and collective dimensions of expert involvement in decision making; and experts and politics and the politics of expertise. With contributions from leading scholars and practitioners, they theorize the experts' involvement in general and address their role in the policy areas of environment, trade, human rights, migration, financial regulation, and agencification in the European Union.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Total number of HTML views: 0

Total number of PDF views: 0 *

Loading metrics...

Total views: 0 *

Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

The Role of ‘Experts' in International and European Decision-Making Processes

Advisors, Decision Makers or Irrelevant Actors?

Book description

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

Contents

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views