Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:24:40.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - My suburban bridgehead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2020

Gaby Magomola
Affiliation:
University of South Africa
Get access

Summary

In 1986, my family relocated to Wendywood, part of the affluent white suburb of Sandton, north of Johannesburg. This radical move, in defiance of the apartheid government laws, caused a major stir in South Africa. To my recollection, no black family had attempted to challenge the government in the manner we had just done.

I had asked Chris Ball to assist me in relocating my family out of Soweto, after the incident with the children. Of course, my wife was also putting pressure on me, because we had the option of returning to the USA. Moving into Sandton was a huge step for us but a major challenge to the governing authorities. I achieved this by suggesting that the bank (and Chris in particular) purchase the house for me because in terms of the Group Areas Act 36 of 1966, no African was allowed to own property in a white suburb in the country. Chris and I had a long discussion about the undertaking. In the end, we agreed that if I was prepared to take the political risk, the Bank would take the commercial risk. Stated differently it meant, in the worst case scenario, I would go to prison and the bank would forfeit the mortgage investment. There was also the socio-political risk that I could be viewed as a sell-out, deserting the community in Soweto and moving into a so-called white suburb.

In addition, possible abuse and physical attack from the lunatic fringe of reactionary whites, the verkramptes, was not a far-fetched fear. These fears loomed large in the decision-making process, considering that, at the time, the attitude of many white South Africans was not fully tested in this regard. Many others had accepted the status quo; their lives were protected and secured by the existence of the discriminatory laws. That the government of the day had been consistently returned to power, with an ever-increasing majority, since 1948 was part evidence of this perception among the majority of the population. There seemed to be some kind of acquiescence by most of the white electorate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: University of South Africa
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×