Agarzarian, Y. and Peters, R. 1981. The Visible and Invisible Group: Two Perspectives on Group Psychotherapy and Group Process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Ahmad, Y., Whitney, I. and Smith, P.K. 1991. ‘A survey service for schools on bully/victim problems’. In Smith, P. K. and Thompson, D. A. (eds), Practical Approaches to Bullying, pp.103–11. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar

Allan, J. 1997. ‘With a little help from my friends? Integration and the role of mainstream pupils’. Children and Society, 11: 183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Alsaker, F. D. 2004. ‘Bernese programme against victimisation in kindergarten and elementary school’. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be, pp. 289–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ananiadou, K. and Smith, P.K. 2002. ‘Legal requirements and nationally circulated materials against school bullying in European countries’. Criminal Justice, 2: 471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anstey, M. 1982. ‘Scapegoating in groups: some theoretical perspectives and a case record of intervention’. Social Work with Groups, 5 (3): 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argyris, C. and Schon, D.A. 1978. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Arora, T. 1994. ‘Measuring bullying with the “Life in School” checklist’. Pastoral Care in Education, 12: 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atria, M., Strohmeier, D. and Spiel, C. 2007. ‘The relevance of the school class as social unit for the prevalence of bullying and victimization’. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (4), 372–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, K. D. 1990. Social Entropy Theory. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, R. V. 1973. ‘The scapegoat – or the one that got away’. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 1 (2): 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bales, R. F. 1950. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Barlow, D. and Durand, V.M. 2008. Abnormal Psychology: an Integrative Approach, 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Barner-Barry, C. 1986. ‘Rob: children's tacit use of peer ostracism to control aggressive behaviour’. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7 (3–4): 281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, M. and Trevitt, J. 1991. Attachment Behaviour and the School Child. London: Tavistock/Routledge.Google Scholar

Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Basilier, T. 1964. ‘Surdophrenia: the psychic consequences of congenital or early acquired deafness’. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 40: 362–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Beck, A. P. and Peters, L.N. 1981. ‘The research evidence for distributed leadership in therapy groups’. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 31: 43–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beck, A. P., Eng, A.M. and Brusa, J.A. 1989. ‘The evolution of leadership during group development’. Group, 13 (3–4): 155–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benbenishty, R. and Astor, R.A. 2005. School Violence in Context. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennis, W. G. and Shepard, H.A. 1956. ‘A theory of group development’. Human Relations, 9(4): 415–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, K. S. 1998. The Developing Person through the Lifespan, 4th edn. New York: Worth.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, L. 1962. Aggression: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Berne, E. 1961. Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Bion, W. R. 1959. ‘Attacks on linking’. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 40: 308–15.Google Scholar

Bion, W.R. 1961. Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. London: Tavistock.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. and Kaukiainen, A. 1992. ‘Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression’. Aggressive Behavior, 18: 117–27.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boehm, C. 1986. ‘Capital punishment in tribal Montenegro: implications for law, biology and theory of social control’. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7 (3–4): 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulton, M. J. 1995. ‘Playground behaviour and peer interaction patterns of primary school boys classified as bullies, victims and not involved’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65: 165–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boulton, M. J. 1997. ‘Teachers’ views on bullying definitions, attitudes and ability to cope'. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67: 223–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowlby, J. 1988. A Secure Base: Clinical Application of Attachment Theory. London: Routledge.

Bridger, H. 1981. Consultative Work with Communities and Organisations. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar

Brusa, J. A., Stone, M.H., Beck, A.P., Dugo, J.M. and Peters, L.N. 1994. ‘A sociometric test to identify emergent leader and member roles: Phase 1’. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 44 (1): 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D., Coldicott, T. and Kinsella, K. 1994. Systemic Work with Organisations: A New Model for Managers and Change Agents. London: Karnac Books.

Caravita, S.C.S., Di Blasio, P. and Salmivalli, C. 2009. ‘Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying’. Social Development, 18 (1): 140–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charmaz, C. 1995. ‘Grounded theory’. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre and Langenhove, L. (eds), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, pp. 27–49. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. and Glaser, R. 1981. ‘Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices’. Cognitive Science, 5 (2): 121–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R. and Farr, M.J. (eds). 1988. The Nature of Expertise. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., Terry, R. and Wright, V. 1991. ‘The role of aggression in peer relations: an analysis of aggression episodes in boys’ play groups'. Child Development, 62: 812–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Colson, D. 1985. ‘Transferance–countertransference patterns in psychoanalytic group therapy: a family systems view’. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 35 (4): 503–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cowie, H. 2000. ‘Bystanding or standing by: gender issues in coping with bullying in English schools’. Aggressive Behavior, 26: 85–97.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Talamelli, L., Chauhan, P. and Smith, P.K. 2002. ‘Knowledge, use of and attitudes towards peer support’. Journal of Adolescence, 25: 453–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crick, N.R. and Grotpeter, J.K. 1995. ‘Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment’. Child Development, 66: 710–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dalenoort, G.J. 1989. ‘Mechanisms of self organisation’. In Dalenoort, G. J. (ed.), The Paradigm of Self Organisation: Current Trends in Self Organisation. In Studies in Cybernetics, Vol 19, pp. 298–308. London: Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Dallos, R. 1991. Family Belief Systems, Therapy and Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Dare, C. 1993. ‘The family scapegoat: an origin for hating’. In Varma, V. (ed.), How and Why Children Hate, pp. 31–45. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar

Davidson, J.E. 1995. ‘Insights about insightful problem solving’. In Davidson, J. E. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds), The Psychology of Problem Solving, pp. 149–75. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, H., Day, C. and Bidmead, C. 2002. Working in Partnership with Parents: The Parent Advisor Model. London: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar

DeFrates-Densch, N., Smith, M.C., Schrader, T.O. and Rique, J. 2004. ‘Impact of course-work and field experience on pre-service and in-service teachers’ implicit theories of development and learning'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Dixon, R. 2005. ‘Integrative thinking: building personal, working models of psychology that support problem-solving’. Psychology: Learning and Teaching 5 (1): 15–22.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. 2006. ‘A framework for managing bullying that involves students who are deaf or hearing impaired’. Deafness and Education International, 8 (1): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. 2007a. ‘Systemic thinking as a framework for research into complex psychosocial problems’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4 (1 and 2): 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. 2007b. ‘Ostracism: one of the many causes of bullying in groups?’. Journal of School Violence, 6 (3): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. 2007c. ‘Scapegoating: another cause of bullying in groups?’. Journal of School Violence, 6 (4): 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. 2008. ‘Developing and integrating theory on school bullying’. Journal of School Violence, 7 (1): 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R., Smith, P.K. and Jenks, C. 2004a. ‘Bullying and difference: a case study of peer group dynamics in one school’. Journal of School Violence, 3 (4): 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R., Smith, P.K 2004b. ‘Managing difference and managing bullying: a case study of one secondary school’. Journal of School Violence, 3 (4):41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodge, K. and Coie, J. 1987. ‘Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (6): 1146–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollard, J., Doob, L.W., Miller, N.E., Mowrer, O.H. and Sears, R.R. 1939. Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowling, E. and Osborne, E. 1985. The Family and the School: A Joint Systems Approach to Problems with Children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, N. 1999. Sexual Bullying: Gender Conflict in Pupil Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Duncker, K. 1945. ‘On problem solving’. Psychological Monographs, 58, No. 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunphy, D.C. 1968. ‘Phases, roles and myths in self-analytic groups’. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 4 (2): 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkin, H.E. 1981. ‘The group therapies and General System Theory as an integrative structure’. In Durkin, J. E. (ed.), Living Groups: Group Psychotherapy and General System Theory, pp. 5–23. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Durkin, J.E. (ed.). 1981. Living Groups: Group Psychotherapy and General System Theory. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

Eagle, J. and Newton, P.M. 1981. ‘Scapegoating in small group: an organisational approach’. Human Relations, 34 (4): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eileenberg, M.E. and Wyman, S.E. 1998. ‘Scapegoating in an early adolescent girls group’. Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy, 8 (1): 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberger, N.I. and Lieberman, M.D. 2005. ‘Why it hurts to be left out: the neurocognitive overlap between physical and social pain’. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas and Hippel, W. (eds), The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection and Bullying, pp. 109–30. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K.A. (2003). ‘The acquisition of expert performance as problem solving: construction and modification of mediating mechanisms through deliberate practice’. In E Davidson, J. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds), The Psychology of Problem Solving, pp. 31–86. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eslea, M. and Smith, P.K. 1998. ‘The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools’. Educational Research, 40: 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eslea, M. and Smith, P.K. 2000. ‘Pupil and parent attitudes towards bullying in primary schools’. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1 (2): 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espelage, D.L. and Swearer, S.M. (eds). 2004. Bullying in American Schools: A Socio-ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Eysenck, M. 1998. Psychology: An Integrated Approach. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. 1993. ‘Understanding and preventing bullying’. In Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, pp. 381–458. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. and Baldry, A. 2007. ‘Effectiveness of programs to prevent school bullying’. Victims and Offenders, 2: 183–204.Google Scholar

Fonagy, P., Steele, H., Steele, M. and Holder, J. 1997. ‘Attachment and theory of mind: overlapping constructs?’ In Forrest, G. (ed.), Bonding and Attachment: Current Issues in Research and Practice. Occasional Papers No. 14. London: ACPP.Google Scholar

Foulkes, S.H. and Antony, E.J. 1957. Group Psychotherapy: The Psychoanalytic Approach. London: Maresfield Library.Google Scholar

Frustenberg, K. and Doyal, G. 1994. ‘The relationship between emotional-behavioural functioning and personal characteristics on performance outcomes of hearing impaired students’. American Annals of the Deaf, 139 (4): 410–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrison, W.M. and Tesch, S. 1978. ‘Self concept and deafness: a review of research literature’. Volta Review, December: 457–66.Google Scholar

Gemmill, G. 1989. ‘The dynamics of scapegoating in small groups’. Small Group Behaviour, 20 (4): 406–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P.M. eds. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gilhooly, K.J. 1996. Thinking: Directed, Undirected and Creative. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M.T. and Kusche, C.A. 1993. ‘Promoting social and emotional development in deaf children: the PATHS Project’. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

Greenberg, M.T. and Kusche, C.A. 1998. ‘Preventative intervention for school-age deaf children: the PATHS curriculum’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3 (1): 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, M.B. 2006. ‘Bullying in schools: a plea for a measure of human rights’. Journal of Social Issues, 62: 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, S., Bishop, J. and Sheldon, L. 1995. Deaf Young People and their Families: Developing Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gruter, M. 1986. ‘Ostracism on trial: the limits of individual rights’. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7 (3–4): 271–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haghighat, R. (2001). ‘A unitary theory of stigmatisation: pursuit of self interest and routes to destigmatisation’. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178: 207–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harvey, M. 1989. Psychotherapy with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Persons: A Systemic Model. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hawker, D.S.J. and Boulton, M.J. 2000. ‘Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies'. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychiatry, 41: 441–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hawkins, P. and Shohet, R. 1989. Supervision in the Helping Professions. Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar

Hindley, P. 1995. Signs of Feeling. London: Royal National Institute for the Deaf.Google Scholar

Hinshelwood, R.D. 1989. A Dictionary of Kleinian Thought. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar

Hodges, E.V.E. and Perry, D.G. 1999. ‘Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimisation by peers’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 677–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodges, E.V.E., Malone, M.J. and Perry, D.G. 1997. ‘Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimisation in the peer group’. Developmental Psychology, 33: 1032–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoel, H., Rayner, C. and Cooper, C.L. 1999. ‘Workplace bullying’. International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, 14: 195–230.Google Scholar

Hugh-Jones, S. and Smith, P.K. 1999. ‘Self reports of short- and long-term effects of bullying on children who stammer’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69: 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, S.C. and Boyle, J.M.E. 2004. ‘Appraisal and coping strategy use of victims of school bullying’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 83–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hycner, R.H. 1985. ‘Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data’. Human Studies, 8: 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jimerson, S.R., Swearer, S. and Espelage, D.L. (eds). 2010. The Handbook of Bullying in Schools: An International Perspective. New York: Routledge.

Jones, E.E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A.H., Markus, H., Miller, D.T., Scott, R.A. and French, R.S. 1984. Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar

Juvonen, J. and Gross, E.F. 2005. ‘The rejected and the bullied: lessons about social misfits from developmental psychology’. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas and Hippel, W. (eds), The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection and Bullying, pp. 1559–70. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kahney, H. 1993. Problem Solving: Current Issues, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Marttunen, M., Rimpela, A. and Rantenan, P. 1999. ‘Bullying, depression, and suicidal ideation in Finnish adolescents: school survey’. British Medical Journal, 319: 348–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaukiainen, A., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., Österman, K., Salmivalli, C., Forsblom, S. and Ahlbom, A. 1999. ‘The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression’. Aggressive Behavior, 25: 81–89.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, P.M., and Kitchener, K.S. 1994. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kitson, N. 1990. ‘Pre-lingual deafness and psychiatry’. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 44: 353–56.Google Scholar

Kitson, N., Fernando, J. and Douglas, J. 1998. ‘Psychodynamic therapies: psychotherapy’. In Hindley, P. and Kitson, N. (eds), Mental Health and Deafness, pp. 337–56. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Knox, E. and Conti-Ramsden, G. 2003. ‘Bullying risks of 11-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI): does school placement matter?’. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 38: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kochenderfer, B.J. and Ladd, G.W. 1996. ‘Peer victimization: cause or consequence of school maladjustment?’. Child Development, 67: 1305–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koo, H., Kwak, K. and Smith, P.K. 2008. ‘Victimization in Korean schools: the nature, incidence and distinctive features of Korean bullying or wang-ta’. Journal of School Violence, 7: 119–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, G.W. and Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. 2002. ‘Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims’. Psychological Assessment, 14:74–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkvist, K., Berts, M. and King, E. 1982. ‘Group aggression among children in three schools’. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leary, M.R. 1990. ‘Responses to social exclusion: social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression and low self-esteem’. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9 (2): 221–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leman, P.J. and Watling, D. 2007. ‘Scapegoating and classroom dynamics: perspectives on the theoretical significance of social groups: commentary on Atriaet al. and Mahdavi & Smith’. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (4): 400–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levine, B. 1979. Group Psychotherapy: Practice and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Limber, S.P., Nation, M., Tracy, A.J., Melton, G.B. and Flerx, V. 2004. ‘Implementation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme in the Southeastern United States’. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 55–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lindzey, G. 1950. ‘An experimental examination of the scapegoat theory of prejudice’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45: 296–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lyndon, P. 1994. ‘The leader and the scapegoat: a dependency group study’. Group Analysis, 27:95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, R. 1981. ‘The concept of role as a boundary structure in small groups’. In Durkin, J. E. (ed.), Living Groups: Group Psychotherapy and General System Theory, pp. 113–26. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Mahdavi, J. and Smith, P.K. 2007. ‘Individual risk factors or group dynamics? An investigation of the scapegoat hypothesis of victimization in school classes’. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (4): 353–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahdi, N.Q. 1986. ‘Pukhtunwali: ostracism and honor among the Pathan Hill tribes’. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7(3–4): 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malcomess, K. 2005. ‘The Care Aims Model’. In Anderson, C. and Gaag, A. (eds), Speech and Language Therapy: Issues in Professional Practice, 43–71. London: Whurr Publishers.Google Scholar

Malekoff, A. 1994. ‘Moments and madness: humanising the scapegoat in the group’. Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy, 4 (3): 171–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, R. 1967. Interpersonal Styles and Group Development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Marschark, M. and Clark, M.D. (eds). 1993. Psychological Perspectives on Deafness. Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Martlew, M. and Hodson, J. 1990. ‘Children with mild learning difficulties in an integrated and in a special school: comparisons of behaviour, teasing and teachers’ attitudes'. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61: 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masters, R.D. 1986. ‘Ostracism, voice and exit: the biology of social participation’. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7 (3–4): 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaughlin, C., Byers, R. and Peppin Vaughan, R. 2010. A comprehensive review of the literature and meta-analysis: responding to bullying among children with special educational needs and for disabilities. Consultation paper. University of Cambridge Faculty of Education for the Anti-Bullying Alliance, Cambridge.Google Scholar

McGrath, H. and Noble, T. 2006. Bullying Solutions: Evidence-based Approaches to Bullying in Australian schools. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar

Mellor, A. 1999. ‘Scotland’. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. and Slee, P. (eds), The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-national Perspective, pp. 91–111. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Menesini, E. 2003. Il bullismo: le azioni efficaci della scuola [Bullying: Effective School Interventions]. Trento: Erickson Edizione.Google Scholar

Merriam, S.B. and Caffarella, R.S. 1999. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide, 2nd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Mezirow, J. 2000. Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Monks, C. and Coyne, I. 2010. Bullying in Different Contexts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Monks, C.P., Smith, P.K., Naylor, P., Barter, C., Ireland, J.L. and Coyne, I. 2009. ‘Bullying in different contexts: commonalities and differences’. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14: 146–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monks, C.P., Smith, P.K. and Swettenham, J. 2003. ‘Aggressors, victims and defenders in preschool: peer, self and teacher reports’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49: 453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, S., Smith, P.K., Thompson, D. and Whitney, I. 1993. ‘Ethnic differences in experiences of bullying: Asian and white children’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63: 431–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morita, Y. 2001. Ijime no kokusai hikaku kenkyu (Cross-national Comparative Study of Bullying). Japan: Kaneko Shobo.Google Scholar

Morita, Y., Soeda, H., Soeda, K. and Taki, M. 1999. ‘Japan’. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. and Slee, P. (eds), The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-national Perspective, pp. 309–23. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Morrison, G.M., Furlong, M.J. and Smith, G. 1994. ‘Factors associated with the experience of school violence among general education, leadership class, opportunity class and special day pupils’. Education and Treatment of Children, 17 (3): 356–69.Google Scholar

Nabuzoka, D. 2000. Children with Learning Difficulties: Social Understanding and Adjustment. Leicester: BPS Books.Google Scholar

Nabuzoka, D. and Smith, P. 1993. ‘Sociometric status and social behaviour of children with and without learning difficulties’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34: 1435–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Najavits, L.M. 1997. ‘Psychotherapists’ implicit theories of psychotherapy'. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 7: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naylor, P., Cowie, H. and del Rey, R. 2001. ‘Coping strategies of secondary school children in response to being bullied’. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 6: 114–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nesdale, D. 2007. ‘Peer groups and children's school bullying: scapegoating and other group processes’. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (4): 388–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickerson, A.B., Mele, D. and Princiotta, D. 2008. ‘Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions’. Journal of School Psychology, 46: 687–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nicolaides, S., Toda, Y. and Smith, P.K. 2002. ‘Knowledge and attitudes about school bullying in trainee teachers’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72: 105–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olweus, D. 1978. Aggression in Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar

Olweus, D. 1992. ‘The Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire’. Unpublished material. Bergen, Norway: Research Centre for Health Promotion.

Olweus, D. 1993. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Olweus, D. 1999. ‘Sweden’. In Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. and Slee, P. (eds), The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-national Perspective, pp. 7–27. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Olweus, D 2004. ‘The Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme: design and implementation issues and a new national initiative in Norway’. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 13–36. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olweus, D. and Endresen, I.M. 1998. ‘The importance of sex-of-stimulus object: age trends and sex differences in empathic responsiveness’. Social Development, 3: 370–88.Google Scholar

O'Moore, A.M. and Hillery, B. 1989. ‘Bullying in Dublin schools’. Irish Journal of Psychology, 10 3: 426–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Moore, A., Kirkham, C. and Smith, M. 1997. ‘Bullying behaviour in Irish schools: a nationwide study’. Irish Journal of Psychology, 18: 141–69.Google Scholar

O'Moore, M. and Minton, S.J. 2004. ‘Ireland: the Donegal Primary School's anti-bullying project’. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 275–87. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Orobio de Castro, B. 2007. ‘Do the same social mechanisms explain bullying in different classrooms? A commentary on Madhavi & Smith and Atria, Strohmeier, & Spiel’. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (4): 393–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ortega, R., del Rey, R. and Mora-Merchan, J. 2004. ‘SAVE model: an anti-bullying intervention in Spain’. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 167–85. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ouwerkerk, J.W., Lange, P.A.M., Gallucci, M. and Kerr, N.L. 2005. ‘Avoiding the social death penalty: ostracism and co-operation in social dilemmas’. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas and Hippel, W. (eds), The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection and Bullying, pp. 321–32. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Owens, L., Shute, R. and Slee, P. 2000. ‘“Guess what I just heard!”: indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia’. Aggressive Behavior, 26: 67–83.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owers, R. 1996. ‘Hearing children's attitudes towards deafness’. Journal of the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, 20 (3): 83–89.Google Scholar

Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Pellegrini, A. D. and Bartini, M. 2000. ‘An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92: 360–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellegrini, A. D. and Bartini, M. 2001. ‘Dominance in early adolescent boys: affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47: 142–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pepler, D. J. 2006. ‘Bullying interventions: a binocular perspective’. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15 (1): 16–20.Google ScholarPubMed

Pepler, D. J. and Craig, W.M. 1995. ‘A peek behind the fence: naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording’. Developmental Psychology, 31: 548–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pepler, D. J., Craig, W.M., O'Connell, P., Atlas, R. and Charach, A. 2004. ‘Making a difference in bullying: evaluation of a systemic school-based programme in Canada’. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 125–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pepler, D. J., Craig, W.M. and Roberts, W.L. 1998. ‘Observations of aggressive and nonaggressive children in the school playground’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44: 55–76.Google Scholar

Perry, D. G., Kusel, S.J. and Perry, L.C. 1988. ‘Victims of peer aggression’. Developmental Psychology, 24: 807–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, W. G., Jr. 1981. ‘Cognitive and ethical growth: the making of meaning’. In Chickering, A. W. (ed.), The Modern American College: Responding to the New Realities of Diverse Students and a Changing Society. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Pidgeon, N. and Henwood, K. 1996. ‘Grounded theory: practical implication’. In Richardson, J. T. E. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and Social Sciences, pp. 86–101. Leicester: BPS Books.Google Scholar

Pikas, A. 1989. ‘A pure conception of mobbing gives the best results for treatment’. School Psychology International, 10: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pikas, A. 2002. ‘New developments of the Shared Concern Method’. School Psychology International, 23: 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pillari, V. 1991. Scapegoating in Families: Intergenerational Patterns of Physical and Emotional Abuse. New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Pitts, J. and Smith, P. 1995. Preventing School Bullying. London: Home Office Police Research Group.Google Scholar

Plous, S. 1999. The Psychology of Judgement and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

,Pupil Attitude Survey. 2005/06. Leicestershire, MIS, Statistics and Information Unit.

,QAA. 2002. Psychology: Subject Benchmark Statements. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.Google Scholar

Rice, C.A. 1992. ‘Contributions from object relations theory’. In R. H. Klein, H. S. Bernard and Singer, D. L. (eds), Handbook of Contemporary Group Psychotherapy, pp. 27–54. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Riegel, K.F. 1973. ‘Dialectic operations: the final period of cognitive development’. Human Development, 16: 346–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rigby, K. 2002. New Perspectives on Bullying. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar

Rigby, K. 2008. Children and Bullying: How Parents and Educators can Reduce Bullying at School. London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rigby, K. and Slee, P.T. 1991. ‘Bullying among Australian schoolchildren: reported behavior and attitudes to victims’. Journal of Social Psychology, 131: 615–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ringwald, J.W. 1974. ‘An investigation of group reaction to central figures’. In Gibbard, G., Hartmen, J. and Mann, R. (eds), Analysis of groups. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Rivers, I. 1995. ‘Mental health issues among young lesbians and gay men bullied in school’. Health and Social Care in the Community, 3: 380–83.Google Scholar

Rivers, I. and Noret, N. 2010. ‘“I h8 u”: findings from a five-year study of text and email bullying’. British Educational Research Journal, 36: 643–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, B. and Maines, G. 2007. Bullying: A Complete Guide to the Support Group Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Roland, E. 1989. ‘A system oriented strategy against bullying’. In Roland, E. and Munthe, E. (eds), Bullying: An International Perspective. London: Fulton Books.Google Scholar

Roland, E. 2000. ‘Bullying in school: three national innovations in Norwegian schools in 15 years’. Aggressive Behavior, 26: 135–43.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roland, E. and Munthe, E. 1997. ‘The 1996 Norwegian Program for preventing and managing bullying in schools’. Irish Journal of Psychology, 18: 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, D.M. 2002. Childhood Bullying and Teasing: What School Personnel, Other Professionals, and Parents Can Do, 2nd edn. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.Google Scholar

Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J. and Lagerspetz, K. 1996b. ‘How do victims respond to bullying?’ Aggressive Behaviour, 22: 99–109.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Kaistaniemi, L. and Lagerspetz, K. 1999. ‘Self-evaluated self-esteem, peer-evaluated self-esteem and defensive egotism as predictors of adolescents’ participation in bullying situations'. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25: 1268–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Voeten, M. and Sinisammal, M. 2004. ‘Targeting the group as a whole: the Finnish anti-bullying intervention’. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 251–73. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K. and Kaukiainen, A. 1996a. ‘Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group’. Aggressive Behavior, 22: 1–15.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandler, J. 1983. ‘Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice’. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64: 35–45.Google ScholarPubMed

Sapsford, R., Still, A., Wetherell, M., Miell, D.E. and Stevens, R. 1998. Theory and Social Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Sarafino, E.P. 2008. Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Interactions, 6th edn. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Sarason, B.S. 1996. Revisiting ‘The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change’. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Sarfaty, L. and Shlomo, S. 1978. ‘The self concept and adjustment patterns of hearing impaired pupils in different school settings’. American Annals of the Deaf, 123: 438–41.Google ScholarPubMed

Schafer, M. and Smith, P.K. 1996. ‘Teachers’ perceptions of play fighting and real fighting in primary school'. Educational Research, 38 (2): 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schulman, L. 1967. ‘Scapegoats, group workers and pre-emptive intervention’. Social Work, 12 (2): 37–43.Google Scholar

Schuster, B. 1999. ‘Outsiders at school: the prevalence of bullying and its relation with social status’. Group Processes and Inter-group Relations, 2: 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schuster, B. 2007. ‘The school class as a unit for prevalence estimations: methodological variations, conceptual clarifications, and implications for intervention and theory testing’. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4 (4): 405–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, D., Dodge, K.A., Pettit, G.S. and Bates, J.E. 1997. ‘The early socialization of aggressive victims of bullying’. Child Development, 68: 665–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Selvini-Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Checcin, G. and Prata, G. 1980. ‘Hypothesising-circularity-neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session’. Family Process, 19: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, S. and Rubinroit, C.I. 1987. ‘The second individuation process in handicapped adolescents’. Journal of Adolescence, 10: 373–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Siann, G., Callaghan, M., Glissov, P., Lockhart, R. and Rawson, L. 1994. ‘Who gets bullied? The effect of school, gender and ethnic group’. Educational Research, 36 (2): 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverman, F.H. and Klees, J. 1989. ‘Adolescents’ attitudes towards peers who wear visible hearing aids'. Journal of Communication Disorders, 22: 147–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinnott, J.D. 1998. The Development of Logic in Adulthood: Postformal Thought and its Applications. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slee, P. 2006. ‘The PEACE pack: A whole-school program for reducing school bullying’. In McGrath, H. and Noble, T. (eds), Bullying Solutions: Evidence-based Approaches to Bullying in Australian Schools, pp.85–99. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar

Smith, P.K. (ed.). 2003. Violence in Schools. The Response in Europe. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Smith, P.K. and Myron-Wilson, R. 1998. ‘Parenting and school bullying’. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 3: 405–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P.K. and Sharp, S. (eds). 1994. School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Smith, P.K. and Shu, S. 2000. ‘What good schools can do about bullying: findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action’. Childhood, 7 (2): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P.K., Ananiadou, K. and Cowie, H. 2003. ‘Interventions to reduce school bullying’. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48: 591–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, P.K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. and Liefooghe, A.P.D. 2002. ‘Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and sex differences, in a 14-country international comparison’. Child Development, 73: 1119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. and Tippett, N. 2008. ‘Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49: 376–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, P.K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. and Slee, P. 1999. The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-national Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, P.K., Pepler, D.J. and Rigby, K. (eds). 2004a. Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be?Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Smith, P.K., Talamelli, L., Cowie, H., Naylor, P. and Chauhan, P. 2004b. ‘Profiles of non-victims, escaped victims, continuing victims and new victims of school bullying’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 565–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stanovich, K.E. 2003. ‘The fundamental computational biases of human cognition: heuristics that (sometimes) impair decision making and problem solving’. In Davidson, J. E. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds), The Psychology of Problem Solving, pp. 291–342. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. 1985. ‘Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 607–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. and Davidson, J.E. 1982. ‘The mind of the puzzler’. Psychology Today, 16: 37–44.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. and Lubart, T.I. 1996. ‘Investing in creativity’. American Psychologist, 51 (7): 677–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, V., Oost, P. and Bourdeauhuij, I. 2004. ‘Interventions against bullying in Flemish schools: programme development and evaluation’. In P. K. Smith, D. J. Pepler and Rigby, K. (eds), Bullying in Schools: How successful Can Interventions Be?, pp. 141–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stinson, M. and Whitmire, K. 1991. ‘Self perceptions and social relationships among hearing impaired adolescents in England’. Journal of the British Association of the Teachers of the Deaf, 15 (4): 104–14.Google Scholar

Sullivan, K., Cleary, M. and Sullivan, G. 2004. Bullying in Secondary Schools. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar

Sutton, J. and Smith, P.K. 1999. ‘Bullying as a group process: an adaptation of the participant role approach’. Aggressive Behavior, 25: 97–111.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutton, J., Smith, P.K. and Swettenham, J. 1999. ‘Social cognition and bullying: social inadequacy or skilled manipulation?’. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17: 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swearer, S.M., Espelage, D.L. and Napolitano, S.A. 2009. Bullying Prevention and Intervention: Realistic Strategies for Schools. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Terry, A.A. 1998. ‘Teachers as targets of bullying by their pupils: a study to investigate incidence’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68: 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, D. and Sharp, S. 1994. Improving Schools: Establishing and Integrating Whole School Behaviour Policies. London: Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar

Thompson, D., Whitney, W. and Smith, P.K. 1994. ‘Bullying of children with special needs in mainstream schools’. Support for Learning, 9 (3): 103–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toker, E. 1972. ‘The scapegoat as an essential group phenomenon’. Psychotherapy, 22 (3): 320–32.Google ScholarPubMed

Tomm, K. 1984a. ‘One perspective on the Milan systemic approach: Part 2. Description of session format, interviewing style and interventions’. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10 (3): 253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomm, K. 1984b. ‘One perspective on the Milan systemic approach: Part 1. Overview of development, theory and practice’. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 10 (2): 113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomm, K. 1987. ‘Interventive interviewing: Part 2. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self help’. Family Process, 26: 167–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomm, K. 1988. ‘Interventive interviewing: Part 3. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic or reflexive questions?’. Family Process, 27 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Torrance, D.A. 1997. ‘“Do you want to be in my gang?”: a study of the existence and effects of bullying in a primary school class’. British Journal of Special Education 24 (4): 158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsuchiya, M., Smith, P.K., Soeda, K. and Oride, K. 2005. Ijime ni torikunda kuniguni (Responses to the issue of ijime/bullying). Kyoto: Minerva Publishing.Google Scholar

Twyman, K.A., Saylor, C.F., Saia, D., Macias, M.M., Taylor, L.A. and Spratt, E. 2010. ‘Bullying and ostracism experiences in children with special health care needs’. Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 31 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tyler, K. 1998. ‘A comparison of the No Blame Approach to bullying and the ecosystemic approach to changing problem behaviour in school’. Pastoral Care in Education, 16: 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vogel, E.F. and Bell, N.W. 1960. ‘The emotionally disturbed child as a family scapegoat’. Psychoanalysis and the Psychoanalytic Review, 47 (2): 21–42.Google Scholar

Wallas, G. 1926. The Art of Thought. New York. Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Watzlawick, P. 1964. An Anthology of Human Communication. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behaviour Books.Google Scholar

Weinberg, N. and Sterritt, M. 1986. ‘Disability and identity: a study of identity patterns in adolescents with hearing impairments’. Rehabilitation Psychology, 31 (2): 95–102.Google Scholar

Weiser, M. and Shertz, J. 1983. ‘Programming problem representation in novice and expert programmers’. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 19 (4): 391–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilde, M. and Haslam, C. 1996. ‘Living with epilepsy: a qualitative study investigating the experiences of young people attending outpatient clinics in Leicester’. Seizure, 5: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, K.D. 1997. ‘Social ostracism’. In Kowalski, R. M. (ed), Aversive Interpersonal Behaviors. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Williams, K.D. and Nida, S.A. 2009. ‘Is ostracism worse than bullying?’. In Harris, M. J. (ed), Bullying, Rejection and Peer Victimization: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective, pp. 279–96. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Williams, K.D., Chambers, M., Logan, S. and Robinson, D. 1996. ‘Association of common health symptoms with bullying in primary school children’. British Medical Journal, 313: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williams, K.D., Forgas, J.P. and Hippel, W. (eds). 2005. The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection and Bullying. New York: Psychology Press.

Wright, F., Hoffman, X. and Gore, E. 1988. ‘Perspectives in scapegoating in primary groups’. Group, 12 (1): 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zawadzki, B. 1948. ‘Limitations of the scapegoat theory of prejudice’. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43: 127–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zippelius, R. 1986. ‘Exclusion and shunning as legal and social sanction’. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7 (3–4): 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar