Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-20T22:15:58.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postscript: What Inefficient History and Malleable Practices Say about Nation-States and Supranational Democracy When Territoriality Is No Longer Exclusive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Giuseppe Di Palma
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
Christopher K. Ansell
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Giuseppe Di Palma
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

This book focused attention on the restructuring of the territorial bases of public authority and societal interests in the contemporary Western state. We employed two analytical tracers. Stefano Bartolini provides the first, Sidney Tarrow the second. Bartolini employs an exit-voice decoder to highlight the subversion of state-centered territorial order, leading to new forms of territorial representation. Tarrow's attention to the relational, exchange, and opportunity strategies available to institutional actors takes us one important step forward. The underlying forces that unpack the state-territorial container, which Bartolini traces, may be insufficient to map how authority and interests will be reshaped: whether around new territorial venues, functional concerns, or both. Thus, exit-voice analysis benefits when cast in an opportunity structure. Together, Bartolini and Tarrow give us a map to visit the contributions to the book.

Christopher Ansell's introduction uses the map to point out the contributors' shared attention to the restructuring of authority and interests. Personally, I am particularly struck by those parts of Bartolini's and Tarrow's analyses that, together, suggest the open-ended, contingent, still unfathomable direction of restructuring. At the same time, I am reminded that, within the modern Western state, territoriality is bundled with sovereignty and by way of it with democracy. Hence, to raise issues about territoriality and its restructuring is to raise empirical and normative issues about democracy.

I therefore revisit the book by way of a postscript.

Type
Chapter
Information
Restructuring Territoriality
Europe and the United States Compared
, pp. 246 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×