Book contents
- Representations and Rights of the Environment
- Series page
- Representations and Rights of the Environment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 An Introduction
- Part I Challenges
- 2 Environmental Humanities
- 3 Decolonising the Dialogue on Climate Change
- 4 Our Relationship with the Land
- 5 A Common Space of Legal Communication
- Part II Recollection
- Part III Perspectives
- Index
- References
5 - A Common Space of Legal Communication
from Part I - Challenges
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2023
Book contents
- Representations and Rights of the Environment
- Series page
- Representations and Rights of the Environment
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 An Introduction
- Part I Challenges
- 2 Environmental Humanities
- 3 Decolonising the Dialogue on Climate Change
- 4 Our Relationship with the Land
- 5 A Common Space of Legal Communication
- Part II Recollection
- Part III Perspectives
- Index
- References
Summary
Engaging with Indigenous legal traditions brings to light the existence of different forms of legal conscience. The Indigenous legal traditions catalyse both the ontological questioning and its response. And they also offer a response to the critique of law and the evolution of legal practice. Approaching different legal traditions requires, however, a change of perspective. This reflection considers the insights of anthropology, linguistics, literature, translation and semiotics as applied to law. Towards a ‘shared framework’ and ‘common legal sense’, the semiotic approach enables us to visualise the legal landscape, beyond the borders of modern constituted forms, on a wider horizon of legal communication. It allows us to approach the narrative semiotics of different legal traditions, such as the dances, storytelling, artefacts like Wampum belts and protocols for ceremonies in Indigenous law. Furthermore, reconnecting legal traditions contributes to recalling, re-embodying and reconnecting the legal subject with the more-than-human realm – reconstituting the legal experience in its integrity. Beyond the operation of translation, what is at stake in the evolution of the legal language and practice is the constitution of a common semiotic space, a space of legal communication and understanding.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Representations and Rights of the Environment , pp. 110 - 144Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Alliot, M. (2003). Anthropologie et juristique: Sur les conditions de l’élaboration d’une science du droit. In Kuyu, C. (ed.), Le droit et le service public au miroir de l’anthropologie. Paris: Karthala, 283–305.Google Scholar
Amselek, P. and Grzegorczyk, C (eds.) (1989). Controverses autour de l’ontologie du droit. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Anaya, J. (2004). Indigenous Peoples in International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arregui, A. G. (2019). This mess is a ‘World’! Environmental diplomats in the mud of anthropology. In Bold, R. (ed.), Indigenous Perceptions of the End of the World: Creating a Cosmopolitics of Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 183–202.Google Scholar
Aspremont, J. and Gardiner, R. (2020). Methodological observations on interpretation in international law, ILA Study Group on the Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation. Kyoto Conference.Google Scholar
Austin-Broos, D. and Merlan, F. (eds.) (2017). People and Change in Indigenous Australia. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
Barbéris, J. A. (1983). Nouvelles questions concernant la personnalité juridique internationale. In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (179). Leiden: Brill, 145–304.Google Scholar
Bederman, D. J. (1996). The souls of international organizations: Legal personality and the lighthouse at Cape Spartel. Virginia Journal of International Law 36(2): 275–377.Google Scholar
Bergthaller, H., Emmet, R., Johns-Putra, A. et al. (2012). Mapping common ground: Ecocriticism, environmental history, and the environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities 5: 261–76.Google Scholar
Birkland, B. (2011). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bold, R. (ed.) (2019). Indigenous Perceptions of the End of the World: Creating a Cosmopolitics of Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Borrows, J. (2002). Recovering Canada: The Resurgence of Indigenous Law. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Borrows, J. (2010). Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. R. (2017). The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution that Could Save the World. Toronto: ECW Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. (1991). Is subjectivity possible? The postmodern subject in legal theory. University of Colorado Law Review 62: 489–524.Google Scholar
Broekman, J. (2016). Meaning, Narrativity and the Real: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education IV. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Burdon, P. (2013). The earth community and ecological jurisprudence. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(5): 815–37.Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, L. (2020). Final Report on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (iacom.hr) & the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). ILA Study Group on the Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation, 29 November–13 December, Kyoto.Google Scholar
Cadava, E., Connor, P. and Nancy, J.-L. (eds.) (1991). Who Comes after the Subject? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (ed.) (1990). Post-Modern Law, Enlightenment, Revolution and the Death of Man. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (1991). Critical international law: Recent trends in the theory of international law. European Journal of International Law 2(1): 66–97.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (2005). International legal personality and the end of the subject: Natural law and phenomenological responses to new approaches to international law. Melbourne Journal of International Law 6: 534–52.Google Scholar
Carty, A. (2007). Philosophy of International Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Castillo, M. M. and Strecker, A. (2017). Heritage and Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Castree, N., Hulme, M. and Proctor, J. D (eds.) (2018). Companion to Environmental studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, A. (2010). Truth and representation in science: Two inspirations from art. In Frigg, R. and Hunter, M. (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 33–50.Google Scholar
Chual, L. J. and Engel, David M. (2019). Legal consciousness reconsidered. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15: 335–53.Google Scholar
Cosnard, M. 2005. Rapport introductif. In Le sujet en droit international. Paris: Pedone, 3–35.Google Scholar
Costa, R. da (2009). Indigenous diplomacies before the nation-state. In Beier, J. (ed.), Indigenous Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–77.Google Scholar
Clark, C., Emmanouil, N., Page, J. and Pelizzon, A. (2019). Can you hear the rivers sing? Legal personhood, ontology, and the nitty-gritty of governance. Ecology Law Quarterly 45(4): 787.Google Scholar
Clarkson, L., Morrissette, V. and Régallet, G. (1992). Our Responsibility to the Seventh Generation: Indigenous Peoples and Sustainable Development. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).Google Scholar
Commaille, J. and Jobert, B. (1998). Les métamorphoses de la régulation juridique. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Craft, A. (2014). Anishinaabe Nibi Inaakonigewin Report. Reflecting the Water Laws Research Gathering conducted with Anishinaabe Elders, 20–23 June 2013 at Roseau River, Manitoba. University of Manitoba’s Centre for Human Rights Research (CHRR) and the Public Interest Law Centre (PILC).Google Scholar
Cunneen, C. and Rowe, S. (2014). Changing narratives: Colonised peoples, criminology and social work. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3(1): 49–67.Google Scholar
Delio (2003). A Franciscan View of Creation: Learning to Live in a Sacramental World, Synthesis provided by: Marie Puleo, The Franciscan Heritage Series, Volume 2.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. (2008). Les forces imaginantes du droit. Cours au Collège de France, Cours no. 6.Google Scholar
Deloria, V. Jr. (1992). God Is Red: A Native View of Religion. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
Descola, P. (2006–07). ‘Modalités de la figuration’, Anthropologie de la nature. Cours au Collège de France, ‘Ontologie des images’.Google Scholar
Dews, P. (2007). Logics of Disintegration, Poststructuralist Thought, and the Claims of Critical Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Dorough, D. (2009). The significance of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its future implementation. In Charters, C. and Stavenhagen, R. (eds.), Making the Declaration Work. Copenhagen: IWGIA, 264–78.Google Scholar
Dubreuil, E. H. (2005). The Personalism of Denis de Rougemont: Spirituality and Politics in 1930s Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eberhard, C. (ed.) (2008). Traduire nos responsabilités planétaires: Recomposer nos paysages juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Eberhard, C. and Vernicos, G. (eds.) (2006). La quête anthropologique du droit. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Erdoes, R. and Ortiz, A.. (2013). American Indian Myths and Legends. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Fagot-Largeault, A. (2006–08). Ontologie du devenir. Paris: Cours au Collège de France.Google Scholar
Favareau, D. et al. (2017). How can the study of the humanities inform the study of biosemiotics? Biosemiotics 10: 9–31.Google Scholar
Frigg, R. and Hunter, M. (eds.) (2010). Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Gaja, G. (2003). First Report on the Responsibility of International Organisations. 26 March, ACN.4/532Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick (2003). La tradition juridique nationale. Revue internationale de droit comparé 2: 276–78.Google Scholar
Goodrich, P. (1987). Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gotti, M. and Williams, C. (eds.) (2010). Legal Discourse across Languages and Cultures. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gounelle, M. (2005). Communicabilité en droit international public. In Baudrez, M. and di Manno, T. (eds.), Liber Amicorum Jean-Claude Escarras. La communicabilité entre les systèmes juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Grant, E., Kotzé, L. J. and Morrow, K. (2013). Human rights and the environment: In search of a new relationship. Synergies and common themes. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(5): 953–65.Google Scholar
Grzegorczyk, C. (1989). Le sujet de droit: Trois hypostases. Archives de Philosophie du Droit 34: 9–32.Google Scholar
Gunn, B. L. (2018). Exploring the International Character of Treaties 1–11 and the Legal Consequences, in Canada in International Law at 150 and Beyond, Paper No. 5, January, Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
Harries-Jones, P. (ed.) (2004). Semiotics, evolution, energy, and development: In honor of the work and life of Gregory Bateson. Seed 4(1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Harrison, K. D. (2010). The Last Speakers: The Quest to Save the World’s Most Endangered Languages. Washington, DC: National Geographic.Google Scholar
Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an Indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work 1(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. G. (2016). Indigenous restorative justice: Approaches, meaning and possibility. University of New Brunswick Law Journal 67: 313–35.Google Scholar
Howard, R., Andrade Ciudad, L. and de Pedro Ricoy, R. (2018). Translating rights: The Peruvian Languages Act in Quechua and Aymara. Amerindia 40: 219–45.Google Scholar
Husson, C. A. D. (1986). Expanding the legal vocabulary: The challenge posed by the deconstruction and defense of law. Yale Law Journal 95: 969–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILC (2006). Report on the Fragmentation of International Law. International Law Commission. UN Doc. A/CN.4/l.682.Google Scholar
Jaccoud, M. (2014). Peuples autochtones et pratiques d’accommodements en matière de justice pénale au Canada et au Québec. Archives de politique criminelle 1(36): 227–39.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. S. (1988). Law, Fact, and Narrative Coherence. Merseyside, UK: Deborah Charles.Google Scholar
Jansen, M. and Pérez Jiménez, G. A. (2017). The Indigenous condition: An introductory note. In Castillo, M. M and Strecker, A. (eds.), Heritage and Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 25–39.Google Scholar
Jodelet, D. (2006). La Place de l’expérience vécue dans les processus de formation des représentations sociales. In Haas, V. (ed.), Les savoirs du quotidien: Transmissions, appropriations, représentations. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 235–55.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2006). The last treatise: Project and person. German Law Journal 7(12): 982–92.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (1997). A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siècle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (2004). The disenchantment of the logically formal legal rationality. Hastings Law Journal 55: 1031–76.Google Scholar
Kimmerer, R. W. (2020). Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
King, J. T. (2007). The value of water and the meaning of water law for the Native Americans known as the Haudenosaunee. Cornell Journal of Public Law and Policy 3(16): 449.Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J., Macdonald, M. E. and Brass, G. M. (2000). The Mental Health of Indigenous Peoples. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
Kohn, E. (2013). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Korten, D. C. (2015). Change the Story, Change the Future: A Living Economy for a Living Earth. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). International law in Europe: Between tradition and renewal. European Journal of International Law 16: 113–24.Google Scholar
Kotze, L. J. (2018). Reflections on the future of environmental scholarship and methodology in the Anthropocene. In Pedersen, O. (ed.), Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–61.Google Scholar
Kotze, L. J. and Kim, R. E. (2019). Earth System Law: The Juridical Dimensions of Earth System Governance. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2014a). L’évolution conceptuelle dans le langage juridique international ou la traduction d’une nouvelle littéralité. Revue Semiotica 201: 145–65.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2014b). Multilevel translation analysis of a key legal concept: Persona juris and legal pluralism. In Le Cheng, K. K. Sin, and Wagner, A. (eds.), Ashgate Handbook on Legal Translation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2015). Reconciliation in Canada: A healing force for social and institutional change. Indigenous Law Bulletin 8(16): 20–23.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2020a). De l’Entendement juridique et des perspectives jurilinguistiques, Actes du Colloque Le droit au prisme des langues. Revue de droit international et de droit compare 1: 69–100.Google Scholar
Lamalle, S. (2020b). L’horizon de la sémiotique juridique. In Emerich, Y, Hulin, A. S. and Lamalle, S (eds.), Coder–Décoder: Linguistique et concepts juridiques. Montreal: Éditions Yvon Blais.Google Scholar
Law Commission of Canada (2006). Justice within: Indigenous legal traditions. www.lcc.gc.caGoogle Scholar
Le Moigne, J. L. (2000) Sur quelques topiques de la complexité … des situations que peut connaître le juriste dans ses pratiques. Droit et Société 46: 407–27.Google Scholar
Le Roy, E. (2004). Pour une anthropologie de la juridicité. Cahiers d’Anthropologie du Droit: 241–47.Google Scholar
Lévesque, C., Cloutier, É. and Salée, D. (eds.) (2011). Co-construction des connaissances en contexte autochtone, Actes de colloque, Réseau de recherche et de connaissances relatives aux peuples autochtones (DIALOG) et Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS). Cahier DIALOG 2013–03.Google Scholar
Lévesque, C., Cloutier, É., Salée, D., Dugré, S. and Cunningham, J. (2009). Aboriginal people in Québec cities: Scientific perspectives and societal challenges. Cahier ODENA 2009–02.Google Scholar
McCaslin, D. W. (ed.) (2005). Justice as Healing: Indigenous Ways, Writings on Community Peacemaking and Restorative Justice, Native Law Centre, University of Saskatchewan. St Paul, MN: Living Justice Press.Google Scholar
McGibbon, E. (2019). Truth and reconciliation: Healthcare organizational leadership. Healthcare Management Forum 32(1): 20–24.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (2018). From ‘decolonized’ to reconciliation research in Canada: Drawing from Indigenous research paradigms. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 17(3): 810–31.Google Scholar
McNally, M. and Martin, D. (2017). First Nations, Inuit and Métis health: Considerations for Canadian health leaders in the wake of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada Report. Healthcare Management Forum 30(2): 117–22.Google Scholar
Mannoni, M. (2020). Rights metaphors across hybrid legal languages, such as Euro English and legal Chinese. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 34: 1375–99.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. (2006). Comparative Legal Linguistics, Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas. Goddard, Christopher (trans.). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. E. S. (2012). Jurilinguistique comparée: Langages du droit, latin et langues modernes. Gémar, Jean-Claude (trans.). Montreal: Éditions Yvon Blais.Google Scholar
May, M. (2017). Desacralizing landscapes: Maya heritage in the global picture. In Castillo, M. M. and Strecker, A. (eds.), Heritage and Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 333–55.Google Scholar
Mazzocchi, F. (2006). Western science and traditional knowledge. EMBO Reports 7(5): 463.Google Scholar
Menski, W. (2005). Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merkouris, P. and Peat, D. (2020). Final Report. ILA Study group on the content and evolution of the rules of interpretation, 29 November–13 December, Kyoto.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (1996). Intuitions de Génie: Images et créativité dans les sciences et les arts. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1998). Nature and the environment on Indigenous and traditional cultures. In Cooper, D. E. and Palmer, J. A. (eds.), Spirit of the Environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. (ed.) (2011). Transforming Law and Institutions, Indigenous Peoples, the United Nations and Human Rights, Non-State Actors in International Law. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Moses, J. (2018). Traditional Care of Sensitive Canadian Indigenous Materials, Delaware Band, Six Nations of the Grand River. Government of Canada: Canadian Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Murtagh, C. (2019). Shifting strategies: The myth of Wanamei and the Amazon. Indigenous REDD+ Programme in Madre de Dios, Peru. In Bold, R (ed.), Indigenous Perceptions of the End of the World: Creating a Cosmopolitics of Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 115–39.Google Scholar
Naffine, N. (2003). Who are law’s persons? From Cheshire Cats to responsible subjects. Modern Law Review 66: 346, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoleon, V. (2007). Thinking about Indigenous legal orders. Research paper, National Centre for First Nations Governance, Canada.Google Scholar
Napoleon, V. and Friedland, H. (2016). The inside job: Engaging with Indigenous legal traditions through stories. McGill Law Journal/Revue de droit de McGill 61(4): 725–54.Google Scholar
Nash, C. (ed.) (1994). Narrative in Culture: The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nijman, J. E. (2004). The Concept of International Personality: An Inquiry into the History and Theory of International Law. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.Google Scholar
Nikolić, M. (2017). All that is air melts into city: Minoritarian apparatuses for a more-than-human. In Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. and Brooks, V. (eds.), Research Methods in Environmental Law: A Handbook. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 482–508.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1989). The Meaning of Meaning: Practical Criticism. New York: Mariner.Google Scholar
Ost, F. (2008). La septième cite: La traduction. In Eberhard, C. (ed.), Traduire nos responsabilités planétaires: Recomposer nos paysages juridiques Brussels: Bruylant, 87–100.Google Scholar
Pahuja, S. (2011). Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parmenter, J. (2013). The meaning of Kaswentha and the two Row Wampum Belt in Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) history: Can Indigenous oral tradition be reconciled with the documentary record? Journal of Early American History 3: 86–87.Google Scholar
Pedro Ricoy, R. de, Howard, R. and Andrade Ciudad, L. (2018). Translators’ perspectives: The construction of the Peruvian Indigenous Languages Act in Indigenous languages. Meta, Journal des traducteurs/Translators’ Journal 63(1): 1–276.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. ([1878] 1958). How to make our ideas clear. In Values in a Universe of Chance, Selected Writings, 1839–1914. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Pelizzon, A. and O’Shannessy, G. (2016). Autonomous legal persons and interconnected ecosystems: An ‘ecological’ self towards the age of re-embodiment’. In Thomas-Pellicer, R., de Lucia, V. and Sullivan, S. (eds.), Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology: Exploring Re-embodiments. New York: Routledge, 224–38.Google Scholar
Petrilli, S. (2021). The law challenged and the critique of identity with Emmanuel Levinas. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 35: 31–69.Google Scholar
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. and Brooks, V. (eds.) (2017). Research Methods in Environmental Law: A Handbook. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pitarch, P. (2008). The labyrinth of translation. In Pitarch, P., Speed, S. and Leyva-Solano, X. (eds.), Human Rights in the Maya Region. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 91–121.Google Scholar
Poirier, S. (2008). Reflections on Indigenous cosmopolitics: Poetics. Anthropologica 50(1), L’expérience et la problématique de la (dé)colonisation: Autour de l’œuvre d’Éric Schwimmer/(De)colonization as experience and field of enquiry: The work of Eric Schwimmer (2008), 75–85, Canadian Anthropology Society.Google Scholar
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Povinelli, E. A. (2002). The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pulitano, E. (2012). Indigenous Rights in the Age of the UN Declaration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramlogan, R. (2002). The environmental and international law: Rethinking the traditional approach. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 3: 1–15.Google Scholar
Report of the International Expert Group Meeting on Indigenous Languages (2008). UN Document: E/C.19/2008/3, http://documents.un.orgGoogle Scholar
Rouland, N. (1991). Aux confins du droit: Anthropologie juridique de la modernité. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. (2011). Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, A/HRC/17/31.Google Scholar
Ruiz Fabri, H. (2005). Les catégories de sujets du droit international. In Le sujet en droit international. Paris: Pedone, 55–71.Google Scholar
Sadongei, A. (2004). What about sacred objects? In Ogden, S. (ed.), Caring for American Indian Objects: A Practical and Cultural Guide. St Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society Press, 17–19.Google Scholar
Salée, D. and Lévesque, C. (2016). The politics of Indigenous peoples–settler relations in Quebec: Economic development and the limits of intercultural dialogue and reconciliation. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 40(2): 31–50.Google Scholar
Santos-Granero, F. and Mentore, G. (eds.) (2006). Special issue in honor of Joanna Overing: In the world and about the world: Amerindian modes of knowledge. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 4(1): 57–80.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (2017). Legal translation: A multidimensional endeavour. Comparative Legilinguistics 36: 37–66.Google Scholar
Sellers, M. N. S. (2005). International legal personality. American Journal of International Law 11: 67–78.Google Scholar
Slaughter, M. and Ratner, S. (1999). Appraising the methods of international law: A prospectus for readers, symposium on method in international law. American Journal of International Law 93(2): 291–302.Google Scholar
Sofoulis, Z. (2018). Representation and reality. In Castree, N., Hulme, M. and Proctor, J. D (eds.), Companion to Environmental Studies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 819.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2004). Vers un nouveau sens commun juridique: Droit, science et politique dans la transition paradigmatique. Gonzales Lajoie, N. (trans.). Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. (2005). Law and Globalisation from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (2012). The politics of translation. In Venuti, Lawrence (ed.), The Translation Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 312–30.Google Scholar
Spretnak, C. (2011). Relational Reality, New Discoveries of Interrelatedness that Are Transforming the Modern World. Topsham, ME: Green Horizon Books.Google Scholar
Stanton, K. (2017). Reconciling reconciliation: Differing conceptions of the Supreme Court of Canada and the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Journal of Law and Social Policy 26: 21–42.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1998). After Babel, Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart-Harawira, M. (2009). Responding to a deeply bifurcated world: Indigenous diplomacies in the twenty-first century. In Beier, J. (ed.), Indigenous Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 207–24.Google Scholar
Subramanian, N. and Chung, S. (2005). Measuring the evolvability of legal personality. Ius Gentium 11: 79–133.Google Scholar
Thomas-Pellicer, R., de Lucia, V. and Sullivan, S. (eds.) (2016). Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology: Exploring Re-embodiments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). Summary of the Final Report. Report Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future. http://nctr.ca/reports.phpGoogle Scholar
UNESCO (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage and UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2005). Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2020). Outcome Document. Los Pinos [Chapoltepek]: Making a Decade of Action for Indigenous Languages, High-level closing event of the International Year, 27–28 February, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2001). Policy of Engagement with Indigenous People.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2014). Report of the Secretary-general, Achievement of the Goal and Objectives of the Second International Decade of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, 6 August, A/69/271.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 25 September, A/RES/70/1.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2019). Report of Special Rapporteur, Human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment, 15 July, A/74/161.Google Scholar
Vaarzon-Morel, P. (2017). Reconfiguring relational personhood among Lander Warlpiri. In Austin-Broos, D. and Merlan, F. (eds.), People and Change in Indigenous Australia. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.Google Scholar
Viala, A. (2001). La définition de l’état de droit: L’histoire d’un défi à la science juridique. Revue Européenne de Droit Public 13(1): 673–691.Google Scholar
Victor, W. (2007). Indigenous Justice: Clearing space and place for Indigenous epistemologies. Research paper for the National Centre for First Nations Governance.Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1968). La formation de la pensée juridique moderne. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wagner, A., King-Kui, S. and Cheng, Le (2014). Legal translatability process as the ‘third space’: Insights into theory and practice. In Le Cheng, K. K. Sin, and Wagner, A. (eds.), Ashgate Handbook on Legal Translation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilmer, F. (2009). Where you stand depends on where you sit? In Beier, J. (ed.), Indigenous Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 185ff.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Philosophical Investigations, Anscombe, G. E. M. (trans.) [1953], 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar