Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:22:22.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Intolerability of Meaning: Myth, Faith, and Reason in Philosophical Responses to Moral Atrocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Thomas Brudholm
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Thomas Cushman
Affiliation:
Wellesley College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

In recent years the philosopher and social theorist Jürgen Habermas, long known for his championing of Enlightenment ideals, has begun to endorse the suggestion that the erosion of the “power of articulation” of religious traditions has left a gap in the ethical vocabulary of predominantly postreligious, individualistic, modern societies. “Secular languages,” Habermas claims, “which simply eliminate what was once intended leave behind feelings of discomfort. As sin was transformed into guilt, and the transgression of divine commands into the breaking of human laws, something was lost.” If we enquire more specifically what has been lost, then Habermas's answer seems to be the eye-opening and heart-opening, the ethically inspirational power of symbolic modes of expression, such as religion once made available to many. Habermas, in fact, has become increasingly concerned that, no matter how deeply the aspiration to universal justice may be anchored in modern consciousness, as an ideal it is simply too abstract and formal to inspire the level of commitment required to advance humankind toward it. In his view, “Pure practical reason can no longer be so confident of countering a process of modernization which is running out of control, empty-handed except for the insights of a theory of justice. For such a theory lacks the creativity of linguistic world disclosure, which would enable it to regenerate a normative consciousness which is withering on all sides.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Religious in Responses to Mass Atrocity
Interdisciplinary Perspectives
, pp. 60 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×