Abeele, M. V., de Wolf, R., & Ling, R. (2018). Mobile media and social space: How anytime, anyplace connectivity structures everyday life. Media and Communication, 6(2), 5–14. doi:10.17645/mac.v6i2.1399Google Scholar

Ahn, D., & Shin, D.-H. (2013). Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2453–2462. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.022Google Scholar

Alberts, J. K., Yoshimura, C. G., Rabby, M., & Loschiavo, R. (2005). Mapping the topography of couples’ daily conversation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(3), 299–322. doi:10.1177/0265407505050941Google Scholar

Aledavood, T., López, E., Roberts, S. G., Reed-Tsochas, F., Moro, E., Dunbar, R. I., & Saramäki, J. (2015). Daily rhythms in mobile telephone communication. PloS ONE, 10(9), e0138098. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138098Google Scholar

Ambady, N., & Skowronski, J. J. (2008). First impressions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Ancu, M. (2012) Older adults on Facebook: A survey examination of motives and use of social networking by people 50 and over. Florida Communication Journal, 40(2), 1–12.Google Scholar

Andalibi, N., Bentley, F., & Quehl, K. (2017). Multi-channel topic-based mobile messaging in romantic relationships. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1 (CSCW), 1–18.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2018/05/ PI_2018.05.31_TeensTech_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar

Arminen, I. (2005). Social functions of location in mobile telephony. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(5), 319–323. doi:10.1007/s00779-005-0052-5Google Scholar

Arnold, M. (2003). On the phenomenology of technology: The “Janus” faces of mobile phones. Information and Organization, 13(4), 231–256. doi:10.1016/S1471-7727(03)00013-7Google Scholar

Axelsson, A. (2010). Perpetual and personal: Swedish young adults and their use of mobile phones. New Media & Society, 12(1), 35–54. doi:10.1177/1461444809355110Google Scholar

Badger, E., & Bui, Q. (2018). How connected is your community to everywhere else in America? Retrieved from: www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/09/19/upshot/facebook-county-friendships.html.Google Scholar

Baker, D. A., & Algorta, G. P. (2016). The relationship between online social networking and depression: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 638–648. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0206Google Scholar

Barkhuus, L., & Polichar, V. E. (2011). Empowerment through seamfulness: Smart phones in everyday life. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 15(6), 629–639. doi:10.1107/s00779-010-0342-4Google Scholar

Baron, N. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, N. (2011). Concerns about mobile phones: A cross-national study. First Monday, 6(8). Retrieved from: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3335/3032.Google Scholar

Baron, N. S., & Campbell, E. M. (2012). Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34(1), 13–27. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.018Google Scholar

Baron, N. S., & Hård af Segerstad, Y. (2010). Cross-cultural patterns in mobile-phone use: Public space and reachability in Sweden, the USA and Japan. New Media & Society, 12(1), 13–34. doi:10.1177/1461444809355111Google Scholar

Barry, C. T., Sidoti, C. L., Briggs, S. M., Reiter, S. R., & Lindsey, R. A. (2017). Adolescent social media use and mental health from adolescent and parent perspectives. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.005Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Google Scholar

Baxter, L. A., & Braithwaite, D. O. (2007). Social dialectics: The contradictions of relating. In Whaley, B. B. & Samter, W. (eds.), Explaining communication (pp. 275–292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Baxter, L. A., & Simon, E. P. (1993). Relationship maintenance strategies and dialectical contradictions in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 225–242. doi:10.1177/026540759301000204Google Scholar

Bayer, J. B., Campbell, S. W., & Ling, R. (2015). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26(2), 128–149. doi:10.1111/hcre.12067Google Scholar

Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Communication & Society, 19(7), 956–977. doi:10.1080/136918X.1084349Google Scholar

Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Baym, N. K. (2009). A call for grounding in the face of blurred boundaries. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14(3), 720–723. doi:10.1111/j/1083-6101.2009.01461.xGoogle Scholar

Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baym, N. K. (2018). Playing to the crowd: Musicians, audiences, and the intimate work of connection. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Baym, N. K., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2009). Tunes that bind?: Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication, & Society, 12(3), 408–427. doi:10.1080/1369118082635430Google Scholar

Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M-C. (2004). Social interactions across media. New Media & Society, 6(3), 299–318. doi:10.1177/1461444804041438Google Scholar

Bazarova, N. N. (2012). Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 815–832. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.xGoogle Scholar

BBC News (2010, July 9). Over 5 billion mobile phone connections worldwide. Retrieved from: www.bbc.co.uk/news/10569081.Google Scholar

Beck, J. (2019, February 4). Facebook: Where friendships go to never quite die. Retrieved from: www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2019/02/15-years-facebook-friendships-wont-die/581824/.Google Scholar

Becker, J. A., Johnson, A. J., Craig, E. A., Gilchrist, E. S., Haigh, M. M., & Lane, L. T. (2009). Friendships are flexible, not fragile: Turning points in geographically-close and long-distance friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(4), 347–369. doi:10.1177/0265407509344310Google Scholar

Bernstein, M. S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013, April 27–May 2). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. Presented at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2013 in Paris. doi:10.1145/2470654.2470658Google Scholar

Bevan, J. L., Galvan, J., Villasenor, J., & Henkin, J. (2016). “You’ve been on my mind ever since”: A content analysis of expressions of interpersonal attraction in Craigslist.org’s Missed Connections posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 18–24. doi:10.106/j.chb.2015.07.050Google Scholar

Beyens, I., Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, K., Ghosh, A., Monsivais, D., Dunbar, R. I., & Kaski, K. (2016). Sex differences in social focus across the life cycle in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 3(4), 160097. doi:10.1098/rsos.160097Google Scholar

Binder, J. F., Roberts, S. G. B., & Sutcliffe, A. G. (2012). Closeness, loneliness, support: Core ties and significant ties in personal communities. Social Networks, 34(2), 206–214. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.12001Google Scholar

Blease, C. R. (2015). Too many “friends,” too few “likes”? Evolutionary psychology and “Facebook depression.” Review of General Psychology, 19(1), 1–13. doi:10.1037/gpr0000030Google Scholar

Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project. www.pewinternet.org/.Google Scholar

boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, D. O., & Schrodt, P. (2015). Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications – A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17(4), 467–488. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01580.xGoogle Scholar

Briskin, J. L., Bogg, T., & Haddad, J. (2018). Lower trait stability, stronger normative beliefs, habitual phone use, and unimpeded phone access predict distracted college student messaging in social, academic and driving contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2633). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02633Google Scholar

Brown, B., O'Hara, K., McGregor, M., & McMillan, D. (2018). Text in talk: Lightweight messages in co-present interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(6), 42. doi: 10.1145/3152419Google Scholar

Brown, C. J., & Brown, R. M. (2006). Selective investment theory: Recasting the functional significance of close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 17(1), 1–29. doi:10.1207/s1527965pli1701_01Google Scholar

Bryant, E. M., & Marmo, J. (2012) The rules of Facebook friendship: A two-stage examination of interaction rules in close, casual, and acquaintance friendships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 29(8), 1013–1035. doi:10.1177/0265407512443616Google Scholar

Bryant, E. M., Marmo, J., & Ramirez, A. Jr. (2011). A functional approach to social networking sites. In Wright, K. B. & Webb, L. M. (eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 3–20). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Bryant, J., & Fondren, W. (2009). Displacement effects. In Nabi, R. L. & Oliver, M. B. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 505–516). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Buntain, C., & Golbeck, J. (2014, April). Identifying social roles in Reddit using network structure. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 615–620). Seoul: ACM. doi:10.1145/2567948.2579231Google Scholar

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2016). 69.7% of 2016 high school graduates enrolled in college. Retrieved from: www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2017/69-point-7-percent-of-2016-high-school-graduates-enrolled-in-college-in-october-2016.htm.Google Scholar

Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2014, April). Growing closer on Facebook: Changes in tie strength through social network site use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 4187–4196). Toronto: ACM. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557094Google Scholar

Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12162Google Scholar

Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 571–580). Vancouver, CA doi:10.1145/1978942.1979023Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2013). Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(25), 10135–10140. doi:10.1073/pnas.1222447110Google Scholar

Caplan, S. E. (2018). The changing face of problematic internet use: An interpersonal approach. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Carmichael, C. L., Reis, H. T., & Duberstein, P. R. (2015). In your 20s it’s quantity, in your 30s it’s quality: The prognostic value of social activity across 30 years of adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 95–105. doi:10.1037/pag0000014Google Scholar

Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R.W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153–170. doi:10.2307/257090Google Scholar

Cather, W. (1918). My Antonia. New York: Library of America.Google Scholar

Caughlin, J. P., & Sharabi, L. L. (2013). A communication interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63(5), 873–893. doi:10.1111/jcom/12046Google Scholar

Caughlin, J. P., & Wang, N. (2020). Relationship maintenance in the age of technology. In Ogolsky, B. G. & Monk, J. K. (eds.), Relationship maintenance: Theory, process, and context. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Center for Humane Technology (2019, June). Learn about the Center for Humane Technology & meet our team. Retrieved from https://humanetech.com/about-us/.Google Scholar

Chan, D. K. S., & Cheng, G. H. L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 305–320. doi:1177/0265407504042834Google Scholar

Chan, M. (2015). Multimodal connectedness and quality of life: Examining the influences of technology adoption and interpersonal communication on well-being across the life span. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 3–18. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12089Google Scholar

Chayko, M. (2014). Techno-social life: The internet, digital technology, and social connectedness. Sociology Compass, 8(7), 976–991. doi:10.1111/soc4.12190Google Scholar

Chayko, M. (2018). Superconnected: The internet, digital media, and techno-social life (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of phubbing on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. doi:10.1111/jasp.12506Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Powell, M. C. (1986). Keeping track of needs in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 333–338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.333Google Scholar

Cody, M. J., & Dunn, D. (2007). Accounts. In Whaley, B. B. & Samter, W. (eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 237–256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Crowley, J. P., Allred, R. J., Follon, J., & Volkmer, C. (2018). Replication of the mere presence hypothesis: The effects of cell phones on face-to-face conversations. Communication Studies, 69(3), 283–293. doi:10.1080/10510974.2018.1467941Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103–108. doi:10.1145/514236.514242Google Scholar

Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191–233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S. K., Singh, J. V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 25(1), 35–42. doi:10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_71_17Google Scholar

Davis, D. A. C. (1997). Development and initial tests of a human energy management theory of communication. Doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9835087).Google Scholar

DeAndrea, D. C., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Attributions for inconsistencies between online and offline self-presentations. Communication Research, 38(6), 805–825. doi:10.1177/0093650210385340Google Scholar

Delwiche, A. (2018). Early social computing: The rise and fall of the BBS scene (1977–1995). In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 35–52). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Dienlin, T., Masur, P. K., & Trepte, S. (2017). Reinforcement or displacement? The reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS communication and their effects on loneliness and life satisfaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(2), 71–87. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12183Google Scholar

Dimmick, J., Feaster, J. C., & Ramirez, A. Jr. (2011). The niches of interpersonal media: Relationships in time and space. New Media & Society, 13(8), 1265–1282. doi:10.1177/1461444811403445Google Scholar

Dimmick, J., Kline, S., & Stafford, L. (2000). The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone. Communication Research, 27(2), 227–248. doi:10.1177/009365000027002005Google Scholar

Domahidi, E. (2018). The associations between online media use and users’ perceived social resources: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(4), 181–200. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy007Google Scholar

Donath, J. (2008). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 231–251. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00394.xGoogle Scholar

Donner, J., Rangaswamy, N., Steenson, M. W., & Wei, C. (2008). “Express yourself” and “stay together”: The middle-class Indian family. In Katz, J. E. (ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 325–338). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Duck, S. (1994a). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Duck, S. (1994b). Relationship maintenance as a shared meaning system. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (eds.), Communication and relational maintenance. (pp. 45–60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duck, S., & Pittman, G. (1994). Social and personal relationships. In Knapp, M. L. & Miller, G. R. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 676–695). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Lenhart, A. (2015). Social media update 2014. Retrieved from: www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2010). How many friends does one person need? Dunbar’s number and other evolutionary quirks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Social cognition on the internet: Testing constrains on social network size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 2192–2201. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0121.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks? Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), e150292. doi:10.1098/rsos.150292Google Scholar

Duran, R. L., & Kelly, L. (2017). Knapp's model of relational development in the digital age. Iowa Journal of Communication, 49, 22–45.Google Scholar

Duran, R. L., Kelly, L. & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.541336Google Scholar

Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). Community participation and Internet use after September 11: Complementarity in channel consumption. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 469–484. doi:10.1111/j.1083-61-1.2006.00022.xGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, R. J., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233–239. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007Google Scholar

The Economist (2016, May 21). Censors and sensibility (pp. 23–24).Google Scholar

Eden, J. & Veksler, A. E. (2016). Relational maintenance in the digital age: Implicit rules and multiple modalities. Communication Quarterly, 64(2), 119–144. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103279Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45–62. doi:10.1177/1461444811410395Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., & Vitak, J. (2015). Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In Sundar, S. S. (ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 205–227). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078Google Scholar

Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordance in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180Google Scholar

Farman, J. (2018). Delayed: The art of waiting from the ancient to the instant world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522Google Scholar

Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Internet and face-to-face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46(3), 250–268. doi:10.1080/01463379809370100Google Scholar

Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). Internet use in the contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27(1), 153–181. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00779.xGoogle Scholar

Foote, J., Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2018). A computational analysis of social media scholarship. In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 111–134). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Fox, J., & Frampton, J. (2017). Social media stressors in romantic relationships. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. & Wrench, J. S. (eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 181–196). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Fox, J. & Moreland, J. J. (2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Computers in Human Behavior, 45(11), 168–176. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.083Google Scholar

French, M., & Bazarova, N. N. (2017). Is anybody out there?: Understanding masspersonal communication through expectations for response across social media platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 303–319. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12197Google Scholar

Frenkel, S., Confessore, N., Kang, C., Rosenberg, M., & Nicas, J. (2018, November 14). Delay, deny and deflect: How Facebook's leaders fought through crisis. Retrieved from: www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/technology/facebook-data-russia-election-racism.html.Google Scholar

Friedman, H. S., & Martin, L. R. (2011). The longevity project: Surprising discoveries for health and long life from the landmark eight-decade study. New York: Hudson Stress Press.Google Scholar

Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Browsing, posting, and liking on Instagram: The reciprocal relationships between different types of Instagram use and adolescents' depressed mood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(10), 603–609. doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0156Google Scholar

Fu, J. S., & Lai, C-H. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure and roots of online social networks 1997–2017: Challenges and opportunities for computer-mediated communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 25(1), 111–128, doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmz020Google Scholar

Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–950. doi:10.5465/256641Google Scholar

Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. (2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., & von Hippel, W. (eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–241). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, D. J., & Baxter, L. A. (1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23(1), 87–114. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00388.xGoogle Scholar

Gramlich, J. (2019). 10 facts about Americans and Facebook. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/02/01/facts-about-americans-and-facebook/.Google Scholar

Grebe, J. P., & Hall, J. A. (2013). Affinity in instant messaging. Northwest Journal of Communication, 41, 81–108. Open source: http://hdl.handle.net/1808/9964.Google Scholar

Greitemeyer, T., Mugge, D. O., & Bollerman, I. (2014). Having responsive Facebook friends affects the satisfaction of psychological needs more than having many Facebook friends. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 252–258. doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.900619Google Scholar

Halfmann, A., & Rieger, D. (2019). Permanently on call: The effects of social pressure on smartphone users’ self-control, need satisfaction, and well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24(4), 165–181. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmz008Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(6), 723–747. doi:10.1177/0265407510386192Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2012). Friendship standards: The dimensions of ideal expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(7), 884–907. doi:10.1177/0265407512448274Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2017a). The experience of mobile entrapment in daily life. Journal of Media Psychology, 29 (Special Issue), 148–158. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000228Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2017b). The regulation of social interaction in everyday life. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(5), 699–716. doi:10.1177/0265407516654580Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2018a). Energy, episode, and relationship: A test of communicate bond belong theory. Communication Quarterly, 66(4), 380–402. doi:10.1080/01463373.2017.1411377Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2018b). When is social media use social interaction? Defining mediated social interaction. New Media & Society, 20(1), 162–179. doi:10.1177/1461444816660782Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2019). How many hours does it take to make a friend? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1278–1296. doi:10.1177/0265407518761225Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., & Baym, N. K. (2012). Calling and texting (too much): Mobile maintenance expectations, (over)dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society, 14(2), 316–331. doi:10.1177/1461444811415047Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., Baym, N. K., & Miltner, K. M. (2014a). Put down that phone and talk to me: Understanding the roles of mobile phone norm adherence and similarity in relationships. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(2), 134–153. doi:10.1177/2050157913517684Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., & Davis, D. A. C. (2017). Proposing the communicate bond belong theory: Evolutionary intersections with episodic interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 27(1), 21–47. doi:10.111/comt/12106Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., Johnson, R. M., & Ross, E. M. (2019a). Where does the time go? An experimental test of what social media displaces and displaced activities’ associations with affective well-being and quality of day. New Media & Society, 21(3), 674–692. doi:10.1177/1461444818804775Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., Kearney, M., & Xing, C. (2019b). Two tests of social displacement through social media use. Information, Communication and Society, 22(10), 1396–1413. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1430162Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., Larson, K. A., & Watts, A. (2011). Satisfying friendship maintenance expectations: The role of friendship standards and biological sex. Human Communication Research, 37(4), 529–552. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01411.xGoogle Scholar

Hall, J. A., & Merolla, A. (2020). Connecting everyday talk and time alone to global well-being. Human Communication Research, 46(1), 594–619. doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz014Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., Pennington, N., & Lueders, A. (2014b). Impression management and formation on Facebook: A lens model approach. New Media & Society, 16(6), 958–982. doi:10.1177/1461444813495166Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., Xing, C., Ross, E. M., & Johnson, R. M. (in press). Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: Results of a four-week diary study. Media Psychology. doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1688171Google Scholar

Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. doi:10.1016/j.chb2017.01.051Google Scholar

Hampton, K. N. (2016). Persistent and pervasive community: New communication technologies and the future of community. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 101–124. doi:10.1177/0002764215601714Google Scholar

Hampton, K. N., Lu, W., & Shin, I. (2016). Digital media and stress: The cost of caring 2.0. Information, Communication & Society, 19(9), 1267–1286. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186714Google Scholar

Hampton, K. N., Sessions, L. F., & Her, E. J. (2011). Core networks, social isolation, and new media. Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 130–155. doi:10.1080/139118x.2010.513417Google Scholar

Hanley, S. M., Watt, S. E., & Coventry, W. (2019). Taking a break: The effect of taking a vacation from Facebook and Instagram on subjective well-being. PloS ONE, 14(6), e0217743. doi:10.1371/journal/pone.0217743Google Scholar

Harris, M. (2014). The end of absence: Reclaiming what we’ve lost in a world of constant connection. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., & Funder, D. (2006). The evolution of accuracy and bias in social judgment. In Schaller, M., Simpson, J. A., & Kendrick, D. T. (eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 15–37). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication, & Society, 8(2), 125–147. doi:10.1080/13691180500146185Google Scholar

Heffer, T., Good, M., Daly, O., MacDonell, E., & Willoughby, T. (2019). The longitudinal association between social media use and depressive symptoms among adolescents and young adults: An empirical reply to Twenge et al. (2018). Clinical Psychological Science, 7(3), 462–470. doi:10.1177/2167702618812727Google Scholar

Hefner, D., & Vorderer, P. (2016). Digital stress: Permanent connectedness and multitasking. In Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M.-B. (eds.), Handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 237–249). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2013). Comparing happiness effects of real and on-line friends. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e72754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072754Google Scholar

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1522Google Scholar

Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2011). Trust and wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 42–78. doi:10.5502/ijw.v1i1.9Google Scholar

Hinsch, C., & Sheldon, K. M. (2013). The impact of frequent social internet consumption: Increased procrastination and lower life satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(6), 496–505. doi:10.1002/cb.1453Google Scholar

Hoffner, C. A., Lee, S., & Park, S. J. (2016). “I miss my mobile phone!”: Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2452–2468. doi:10.1177/1461444815592665Google Scholar

Hruschka, D. J. (2010). Friendship: Development, ecology, and evolution of a relationship. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Huang, C. (2010). Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 241–249. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0217Google Scholar

Huang, C. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20(6), 346–354. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0758Google Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1943/1970). Characteristics of innate behavior under conditions of need. In Russell, W. A. (ed.), Milestone in motivation: Contribution to the psychology of drive and purpose (pp. 520–530). New York: Meredith Corporation. (Reprinted from Principles of Behavior [D. Appleton-Century, 1943], pp. 57–67.)Google Scholar

Humphreys, L. (2005). Cellphones in public: Social interactions in a wireless era. New Media & Society, 7(6), 810–833. doi:10.1177/1461444805058164Google Scholar

Humphreys, L. (2018). The qualified self: Social media and the accounting of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Humphreys, L., Gill, P., Krishnamurthy, B., & Newbury, E. (2013). Historicizing new media: A content analysis of Twitter. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 413–431. doi:10.1111/jcom.12030Google Scholar

Humphreys, L., von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2013). Evolving mobile media: Uses and conceptualizations of the mobile internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 491–507. doi:10.111/jcc4.12019Google Scholar

Hunt, M. G., Marx, R., Lipson, C., & Young, J. (2018). No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37(10), 751–768. doi:10.1521/jscp.2018.37.10.751Google Scholar

International Telecommunications Union (2010). Global ICT development, 2000–2010. Retrieved from: www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/statistics/material/graphs/2010/Global_ICT_Dev_00-10.jpg.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. J., & Becker, J. A. H. (2011). CMC and the conceptualization of “friendship”: How friendships have changed with the advent of new methods of interpersonal communication. In Wright, K. B. & Webb, L. M. (eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 225–243). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. J., Bostwick, E., & Bassick, M. (2017). Long-distance versus geographically close romantic relationships: The effects of social media on the development and maintenance of these relationships. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. & Wrench, J. S. (eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 113–130). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Joinson, A. N. (2008) Looking at, looking up, or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1027–1036). Florence, IT: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213Google Scholar

Karakayali, N., & Kilic, A. (2013). More network conscious than ever? Challenges, strategies, and analytic labor of users in the Facebook environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 61–79. doi:10.1111/jcc4/12005Google Scholar

Kim, H., Kim, G. J., Park, H. W., & Rice, R. E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1183–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369Google Scholar

Kim, J., & Lee, J-E. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6), 359–364. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0374Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kelly, R., Gooch, D., Patil, B., & Watts, L. (2017, February). Demanding by design: Supporting effortful communication practices in close personal relationships. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 70–83). ACM.Google Scholar

Kelly, R., & Watts, L. (2015). Characterising the inventive appropriation of emoji as relationally meaningful in mediated close personal relationships. In Experiences of technology appropriation: Unanticipated users, usage, circumstances, and design. Retrieved from: https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/characterising-the-inventive-appropriation-of-emoji-as-relational.Google Scholar

Knapp, M. L., & Daly, J. A. (2011). Background and current trends in the study of interpersonal communication. In Knapp, M. L. & Daly, J. A. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of interpersonal communication (4th ed., pp. 3–24). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Knausenberger, J., Hellmann, J. H., & Echterhoff, G. (2015). When virtual contact is all you need: Subtle reminders of Facebook preempt social-contact restoration after exclusion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 279–284. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2035Google Scholar

Knowles, M. L., Haycock, N., & Shaikh, I. (2015). Does Facebook magnify or mitigate threats to belonging? Social Psychology, 46(6), 313–324. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000246Google Scholar

Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109–125. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.6Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J. N., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74. doi:10.1111/1540-4560/00248Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031. doi:10/1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017Google Scholar

Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., … Ybarra, O. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e69841. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069841Google Scholar

Lane, B. L., & Piercy, C. W. (2017). Making sense of becoming Facebook official: Implications for identity and time. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. & Wrench, J. S. (eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 31–46). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

LaRose, R., Connolly, R., Lee, H., Li, K., & Hales, K. D. (2014). Connection overload? A cross-cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Information Systems Management, 31(1), 59–73. doi:10.1080/10580530.2014.854097Google Scholar

Larsson, A. O. (2015). Comparing to prepare: Suggesting ways to study social media today – And tomorrow. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–2. doi:10.1177/2056305115578680Google Scholar

Lasén, A., & Casado, E. (2012). Mobile telephony and the remediation of couple intimacy. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 550–559. doi:10.1080.14680777.2012.741871Google Scholar

Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.Google Scholar

Leary, M. R. (2001). The self we know and the self we show: Self-esteem, self-presentation, and the maintenance of interpersonal relationships. In Fletcher, G. J. O. & Clark, M. S. (eds.), Interpersonal processes (pp. 457–477). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Leary, M. R., & Kelly, K. M. (2008). Belonging motivation. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 400–409). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Leatham, G., & Duck, S. (1990). Conversations with friends and the dynamics of social support. In Duck, S. & Silver, R. C. (eds.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 1–29). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M. (2010). Content- and medium-specific decomposition of friendship relational maintenance: Integrating equity and media multiplexity approaches. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(7), 938–955. doi:10.1177/0265407510376254Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M. (2015). Media multiplexity theory: Technology use and interpersonal tie strength. In Braithwaite, D. O. & Schrodt, P. (eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 363–376). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ledbetter, A. M., Taylor, S. H., & Mazer, J. P. (2016). Enjoyment fosters media use frequency and determines its relational outcomes: Toward a synthesis of uses and gratifications theory and media multiplexity theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.053Google Scholar

Lee, H. P., Chen, K. Y., Lin, C. H., Chen, C. Y., Chung, Y. L., Chang, Y. J., & Sun, C. R. (2019). Does who matter?: Studying the impact of relationship characteristics on receptivity to mobile IM messages. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 526). Glasgow UK: ACM.Google Scholar

Lenhart, A. (2012). Teens, smartphones & texting. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 1–34. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/03/19/teens-smartphones-texting/.Google Scholar

Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Retrieved from: www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/.Google Scholar

Levordashka, A., & Utz, S. (2016). Ambient awareness: From random noise to digital closeness in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 147–154. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.037Google Scholar

Licoppe, C. (2004). “Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135–156. doi:10.1068/d323tGoogle Scholar

Licoppe, C. (2012). Understanding mediated appearances and their proliferation: The case of phone rings and the “crisis of the summons.” New Media & Society, 14(7), 1073–1091. doi:10.1177/1461444812452410Google Scholar

Licoppe, C., & Heurtin, J. P. (2001). Managing one’s availability to telephone communication through mobile phones: A French case study of the development dynamics of mobile phone use. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5(2), 99–108. doi:10.1007/s007790170013Google Scholar

Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. New York: Crown Publishers/Random House.Google Scholar

Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Ling, R. (2008). Mobile telephones and the disturbance of the public sphere. Europe, 115, 1–17. Retrieved from: http://richardling.com/papers/2004_disturbance_of_social_sphere.pdf.Google Scholar

Ling, R. (2010). Texting as a life phase medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 277–292. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01520.xGoogle Scholar

Ling, R., Bertel, T., & Sundsøy, P. (2012). The socio-demographics of texting: An analysis of traffic data. New Media & Society, 14(2), 280–297. doi:10.1177/1461444811412711Google Scholar

Ling, R., & Lai, C.-H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. doi:10.111/jcom.12251Google Scholar

Ling, R. & McEwen, R. (2010). Mobile communication and ethics: Implications of everyday actions on social order. Etikk i Praksis, 4(2), 11–25. doi:10.5324/eip.v4i2.1760Google Scholar

Ling, R., & Ytrri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. (eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Litt, E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 330–345. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.705195Google Scholar

Liu, D., Ainsworth, S. E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016). A meta-analysis of social networking online and social capital. Review of General Psychology, 20(4), 369–391. doi:10.1037/gpr0000091Google Scholar

Liu, D., & Yang, C-C. (2016). Media niche of electronic communication channels in friendship: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(6), 451–466. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12175Google Scholar

Lo, J. (2019). Exploring the buffer effect of receiving social support on lonely and emotionally unstable social networking users. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 103–116. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.052Google Scholar

Lomas, N. (2017, August 22). Teens favoring Snapchat and Instagram over Facebook, says eMarketer. Retrieved from: https://techcrunch.com/2017/08/22/teens-favoring-snapchat-and-instagram-over-facebook-says-emarketer/.Google Scholar

Lucas, R. E., & Dyrenforth, P. S. (2006). Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being? In Vohs, K. D. & Finkel, E. J. (eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 254–273). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667–680. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12069Google Scholar

Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486Google Scholar

Mai, L. M., Freudenthaler, R., Schneider, F. M., & Vorderer, P. (2015). “I know you’ve seen it!” Individual and social factors for users’ chatting behavior on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 296–302. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.074Google Scholar

Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 369–380. doi:10.1037/a0026338Google Scholar

Manago, A. M., & Vaughn, L. (2015). Social media, friendship, and happiness in the millennial generation. In Demir, M. (ed.), Friendship and happiness (pp. 187–206). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Manley, T. (2017). Millennials’ use of online applications for romantic development. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. & Wrench, J. S. (eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 47–64). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Marcus, B., Machilek, F., & Schütz, A. (2006). Personality in cyberspace: Personal websites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 1014–1031. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.1014Google Scholar

Marwick, A. E. (2012). The public domain: Social surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society, 9(4), 378–393. doi:10.24908/ss.v9i4.4342Google Scholar

Masur, P. K., Reinecke, L., Ziegele, M., & Quiring, O. (2014). The interplay of intrinsic need satisfaction and Facebook specific motives in explaining addictive behavior on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 376–386. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.047Google Scholar

McAndrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2359–2365. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007Google Scholar

McDaniel, B. T., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.027Google Scholar

McEwan, B. (2013) Caring, sharing, and surveilling: An actor-partner interdependence model examination of Facebook relational maintenance strategies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(12), 863–869. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0717Google Scholar

McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 299–315. doi:10.1177/1461444811412712Google Scholar

Meier, A., Reinecke, L., & Meltzer, C. E. (2016). “Facebocrastination”? Predictors of using Facebook for procrastination and its effects on students’ well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 65–76. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.011Google Scholar

Merolla, A. M., Hall, , & J. A. (2018). Unpublished dataset. Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/9pwb4?view_only=a71c471a456d445fbca10892187d9558.Google Scholar

Merolla, A. M., Hall, J. A., & Bernhold, Q. (2019). Perseverative cognition, distracted communication, and well-being in everyday social interaction. Personal Relationships, 26(3), 507–528. doi:10.1111/pere.12286Google Scholar

Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The Information Society, 22, 137–148. doi:10.1080/01972240600677805Google Scholar

Mesch, G. S., Talmud, I., & Quan-Haase, A. (2012). Instant messaging social networks: Individual, relational, and cultural characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(6), 736–759. doi:10.1177/0265407512448263Google Scholar

Middleton, C. A., & Cukier, W. (2006). Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional?: Two perspectives on mobile email usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 252–260. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000614Google Scholar

Mihailidis, P. (2014). A tethered generation: Exploring the role of mobile phones in the daily life of young people. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 58–72. doi:10.1177/2050157913505558Google Scholar

Milardo, R. M., Johnson, M. P., & Huston, T. L. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 964–976.Google Scholar

Milardo, R. M., Helms, H. M., Widmer, E. D., & Marks, S. R. (2014). Social capitalization in personal relationships. In Agnew, C. R. (ed.), Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (pp. 33–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, G. R., & Steinberg, M. (1975). Between people: A new analysis of interpersonal communication. Chicago, IL: Science Research Association.Google Scholar

Miller, J. D. (2014 ). Longitudinal study of American youth, 1987–1994, 2007–11. User guide. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. Retrieved from: www.lsay.org/about.html.Google Scholar

Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2016). Competing discourses and meaning-making in talk about romantic partners’ cell-phone contact with non-present others. Communication Studies, 67(1), 58–67. doi:10.1080/10510974.2015.1088876Google Scholar

Miritello, G., Moro, E., Lara, R., Martinez-Lopez, R., Belchamber, J., Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Time as a limited resource: Communication strategy in mobile phone networks. Social Networks, 35, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.01.003Google Scholar

Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298. doi:10.1177/0013916514539755Google Scholar

Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environment and Behavior, 44(6), 737–759. doi:10.1177/0013916511404408Google Scholar

Mollenhorst, G., Volker, B., & Flap, H. (2014). Changes in personal relationships: How social contexts affect the emergence and discontinuation of relationships. Social Networks, 37, 65–80. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.12.003Google Scholar

Morgan, D. (2009) Acquaintances: The space between intimates and strangers. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. L., Neal, M. B., & Carder, P. (1996). The stability of core and peripheral networks over time. Social Networks, 19(1), 9–25. doi:10.1016/SO378-8733(96)00288-2Google Scholar

Nagi, Ariel. (2012). 9 ways technology can ruin your relationship. Cosmopolitan for Latinas. Retrieved from: www.cosmopolitan.com/cosmo-latina/how-technology-ruins-relationships.Google Scholar

Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1 – A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–294. doi:10.1007/s10567-018-0261Google Scholar

Neustaedter, C., & Greenberg, S. (2012). Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12) (pp. 753–762). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2207676.2207785Google Scholar

New York Times (2016). Facebook bends the rules of audience engagements to its advantage. Retrieved from: www.nytimes.com/2016/05/06/business/facebook-bends-the-rules-of-audience-engagement-to-its-advantage.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavior Scientist, 45(3), 420–435. doi:10.1177/00027640121957277Google Scholar

Nie, N. H., & Hillygus, D. S. (2002). The impact of internet use on sociability: Time-diary findings. IT & Society, 1(1), 1–20. doi:10.1002/9780470774298.ch7Google Scholar

Nielsenwire (2008, September 22). In US, SMS text messaging tops mobile phone calling. Retrieved from: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-us-text-messaging-tops-mobile-phone-calling/.Google Scholar

Nielsenwire (2010). U.S. teen mobile report: Calling yesterday, texting today, using apps tomorrow. Retrieved from: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/u-s-teen-mobile-report-calling-yesterday-texting-today-using-apps-tomorrow/.Google Scholar

Nielsenwire (2013). The mobile consumer: A global snapshot. Retrieved from: www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/Mobile-Consumer-Report-2013-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. Proceedings from Americas Conference on Information Systems. Boston.Google Scholar

O’Connor, S. C., & Rosenblood, L. K. (1996). Affiliation motivation in everyday experience: A theoretical comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 513–522. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.513Google Scholar

Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., & LaRose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.053Google Scholar

O’Hara, K., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1131–1143). Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Okun, M. A., Stock, W. A., Haring, M. J., & Witter, R. A. (1984). The social activity/subjective well-being relation: A quantitative synthesis. Research on Aging, 6(1), 45–65. doi:10.1177/0164027584006001003Google Scholar

Olmstead, K., Lampe, C. & Ellison, N. B. (2016). Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org.Google Scholar

Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(21), 10226–10228. doi:10.1073/pnas.1902058116Google Scholar

Orchard, L. J., Fullwood, C., Morris, N., & Galbraith, N. (2015). Investigating the Facebook experience through Q methodology: Collective investment and a “Borg” mentality. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1547–1565. doi:10.1177/1461444814530099Google Scholar

Osnos, E. (2018). Can Mark Zuckerberg fix Facebook before it breaks democracy? The New Yorker Magazine. Retrieved from: www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/09/17/can-mark-zuckerberg-fix-facebook-before-it-breaks-democracy.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, P. B. (2005). Masspersonal communication: Rethinking the mass interpersonal divide. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. doi:10.1177/1461444816686104Google Scholar

Park, N., Chung, J. E., & Lee, S. (2012). Explaining the use of text-based communication media: An examination of three theories of media use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(7), 357–363. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0121.Google Scholar

Parks, M. R. (2007). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Parks, M. R. (2011). Boundary conditions for the application of three theories of computer‐mediated communication to MySpace. Journal of Communication, 61(4), 557–574. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01569.xGoogle Scholar

Parks, M. R. (2017). Embracing the challenges and opportunities of mixed-media relationships. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 505–517. doi:10.1111/hcre.12125Google Scholar

Pennington, N. (2015). Building and maintaining relationships in the digital age: Using social penetration theory to explore communication through social networking sites. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Pennington, N., & Hall, J. A. (2014). An analysis of humor orientation on Facebook: A lens model approach. Humor, 27(1), 1–21. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0053Google Scholar

Pew Research Center (2018). Mobile fact sheet. Retrieved from: www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.Google Scholar

Pinsker, J. (2019). The new long-distance relationship. Retrieved from: www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2019/05/long-distance-relationships/589144/.Google Scholar

Piquart, M. & Sorensen, S. (2003). Risk factor for loneliness in adulthood and old age: A meta-analysis. In Shohov, S. P. (ed.), Advances in psychology research (vol. 19, pp. 111–143). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar

Platt, C. A., Bourdeaux, R., & DiTunnariello, N. (2014). Should I text or should I call?: How college students navigate mediated connections with family. In Robinson, L., Cotton, S. R., & Schulz, J. (eds.), Communication and Information Technologies Annual (pp. 75–101). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar

Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 253–258. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0161Google Scholar

Poushter, J. (2016). Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/Google Scholar

Prentice, M., Halusic, M., Sheldon, K. M. (2014). Integrating theories of psychological needs-as-requirements and psychological needs-as-motives: A two process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 73–85. doi:10.1111/spc3.12088Google Scholar

Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., Barrett, E. L., Sidani, J. E., Colditz, J. B., & James, A. E. (2017). Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: A nationally-representative study among U.S. young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.013Google Scholar

Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014Google Scholar

Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246. doi:10.1177/0265407512453827Google Scholar

Quan-Haase, A. (2007). University students' local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 671–693. doi:10.1080/13691180701658020Google Scholar

Quan-Haase, A., & Collins, J. L. (2008). I’m there, but I might not want to talk to you. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 526–543. doi:10.1080/13691180801999043Google Scholar

Quinn, K. (2013). We haven’t talked in 30 years! Relationship reconnection and internet use at midlife. Information, Communication, and Society, 16(3), 397–420. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.756047Google Scholar

Quinn, K., & Papacharissi, Z. (2018). Our networked selves: Personal connection and relational maintenance in social media use. In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 353–371). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Rae, J. R., & Lonborg, S. D. (2015). Do motivations for using Facebook moderate the association between Facebook use and psychological well-being? Frontiers in Psychology, 6(771), 271–280. doi:103389/fpsyg.2015.00771Google Scholar

Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rainie, L., & Zickhur, K. (2015, August 26). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Retrieved from: www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/.Google Scholar

Rains, S. A., Brunner, S. R., & Oman, K. (2016). Self-disclosure and new communication technologies: The implications of receiving superficial self-disclosures from friends. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(1), 42–61. doi:10.117/0265407514562561Google Scholar

Rains, S. A., Peterson E, B., & Wright, K. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 403–430. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530Google Scholar

Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 309–336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.xGoogle Scholar

Ramirez, A. Jr., & Broneck, K. (2009). “IM me”: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2–3), 291–314. doi:10.1177/025407509106719Google Scholar

Ramirez, A. Jr., Dimmick, J., Feaster, J., & Lin, S.-F. (2008). Revisiting interpersonal media competition: The gratification niches of instant messaging, e-mail, and the telephone. Communication Research, 35(4), 529–547. doi:10.1177/0093650208315979Google Scholar

Ramirez, A. Jr., Sumner, E. M., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2015). When online dating partners meet offline: The effect of modality switching on relationship communication between online daters. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 99–115. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12101Google Scholar

Ramirez, A. Jr., Sumner, E. M., & Spinda, J. (2017). The relational reconnection function of social network sites. New Media & Society, 19(6), 807–825. doi:10.1177/1461444815614199Google Scholar

Ramirez, A. Jr., & Wang, Z. (2008). When online meets offline: An expectancy violation theory perspective on modality switching. Journal of Communication, 58, 20–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00372.xGoogle Scholar

Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rawlins, W. K. (2009). The compass of friendship. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Reinecke, L. (2017). POPC and well-being: A risk-benefit analysis. In. Vorderer, P., Hefner, D., Reinecke, L., & Klimmt, C. (eds.), Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world (pp. 233–243). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reinecke, L., Aufenanger, S., Beutel, M. E., Dreier, M., Quiring, O., Stark, B., … Müller, K. W. (2017). Digital stress over the life span: The effects of communication load and Internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychology, 20(1), 90–115. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832Google Scholar

Reinecke, L., Vorderer, P., & Knop, K. (2014). Entertainment 2.0? The role of intrinsic and extrinsic need satisfaction for the enjoyment of Facebook use. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 417–438. doi:10.1111/jcom.12099Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2001) Relationship experiences and emotional well-being. In Ryff, C. D. & Singer, B. H. (eds.), Emotion, social relationships, and health (pp. 57–85). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Requena, F., & Ayuso, L. (2018). Individualism or complementarity? The effect of digital personal networks on face-to-face personal networks. Information, Communication & Society, 22(14), 2097–2111. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477968Google Scholar

Rettberg, J. W. (2018). Self-representation in social media. In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 429–443). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Rettie, R. (2007). Texters not talkers: Phone aversion among mobile phone users. Psychology Journal, 5(1), 33–57.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134–141. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058Google Scholar

Roberts, S. B. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The costs of family and friends: An 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.005Google Scholar

Robinson, J. P. (2011). IT use and leisure time displacement: Convergent evidence over the last 15 years. Information, Communication & Society, 14(4), 495–509. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2011.562223Google Scholar

Rook, K. S. (1984). Promoting social bonding: Strategies for helping the lonely and socially isolated. American Psychologist, 39(12), 1389–1407. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.12.1389Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., & Falcon, M. (2016). How couples meet and stay together (HCMST), Wave 1 2009, Wave 2 2010, Wave 3 2011, Wave 4 2013, Wave 5 2015, United States. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. doi:10.3886/ICPSR30103.v8Google Scholar

Rowling, J. K. (2000). Harry Potter and the chamber of secrets. New York: Scholastic Press.Google Scholar

Rudd, D. C. (1989, October). AT&T plans cuts in long-distance rates. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from: www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1989-12-20-8903190444-story.html.Google Scholar

Ruppel, E. K., & Burke, T. J. (2015). Complementary channel use and the role of social competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 37–51.Google Scholar

Ruppel, E. K., Burke, T. J., & Cherney, M. R. (2018). Channel complementarity and multiplexity in long-distance friends’ patterns of communication technology use. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1564–1579. doi:10.1177/1461444817699995Google Scholar

Ruppel, E. K., Gross, C., Stoll, A., Peck, B., Allen, M. R., & Kim, S. (2017). Reflecting on connecting: Meta-analysis of differences between mediated and face-to-face self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 18–34. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12179Google Scholar

Sacco, D. F., & Ismail, M. M. (2014). Social belongingness satisfaction as a function of interaction medium: Face-to-face interactions facilitate greater social belonging and interaction enjoyment compared to instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 359–364. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.004Google Scholar

Sagioglou, C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2014). Facebook’s emotional consequences: Why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 359–363. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.003Google Scholar

Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(7), 910–922. doi:10.1177/0146167214529799Google Scholar

Saramaki, J., Leicht, E. A., Lopez, E., Roberts, S. G. B., Reed-Tsochas, F., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Persistence of social signatures in human communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(3), 942–947. doi:10.1073/pnas.1308540110Google Scholar

Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2016). Does singlehood isolate or integrate? Examining the link between marital status and ties to kin, friends, and neighbors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 361–384. doi:10.1177/0265407515597564Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar

Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2018). Procrastination out of habit? The role of impulsive versus reflective media selection in procrastinatory media use. Media Psychology, 21(4), 640–668. doi:10.1080/152132269.2018.1476156Google Scholar

Scissors, L. E., & Gergle, D. (2013). Back and forth, back and forth: Channel switching in romantic couple conflict. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 237–248. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Scott, C. R. (2009). A whole-hearted effort to get it half right: Predicting the future of communication technology scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 753–757. doi:10.111/j.1083-6101.2009.01467.xGoogle Scholar

Scott, V. M., Mottarella, K. E., & Lavooy, M. J. (2006). Does virtual intimacy exist? A brief exploration into reported levels of intimacy in online relationships. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 759–761.Google Scholar

Seltzer, L. J., Ziegler, T. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2010). Social vocalizations can release oxytocin in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1694), 2661–2666. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0567Google Scholar

Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2012). The evolutionary origins of friendship. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 153–177. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120810-100337Google Scholar

Shakya, H. B., & Christakis, N. A. (2017). Association of Facebook use with compromised well-being: A longitudinal study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(3), 203–211. doi:10.1093/aje/kww189Google Scholar

Sharabi, L. & Caughlin, J. P. (2017a). Usage patterns of social media across stages of romantic relationships. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. & Wrench, J. S. (eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 15–30). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Sharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2017b). What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 370–391. doi:10.1111/pere.12188Google Scholar

Sharabi, L. L., & Dykstra-DeVette, T. A. (2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3389–3407. doi:10.1177/0265407518822780Google Scholar

Sheer, V. C. (2011). Teenagers’ use of MSN features, discussion topics, and online friendship development: The impact of media richness and communication control. Communication Quarterly, 59, 82–103. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.525702Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., & Hinsch, C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 766–775. doi:10.1037/a0022407Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M., & Gunz, A. (2009). Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1467–1492. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00589.xGoogle Scholar

Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Small, M. L. (2017). Someone to talk to. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Small, M. L., Pamphile, V. D., & McMahan, P. (2015). How stable is the core discussion network? Social Networks, 40, 90–102. doi:10.1016/j/socnet/2014.09.001Google Scholar

Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011) Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011Google Scholar

Song, H., Zmyslinski-Seelig, A., Kim, J., Drent, A., Victor, A., Omori, K., & Allen, M. (2014). Does Facebook make you lonely?: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 446–452. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.011Google Scholar

Sprecher, S. (2014). Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.029Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., Hampton, A. J., Heinzel, H. J., & Felmlee, D. (2016). Can I connect with both you and my social network? Access to network-salient communication technology and get-acquainted interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 423–432. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.090Google Scholar

St. Clair, B. (2016, June 30). The real reason so many millennials are living at home. Washington Post. Retrieved from: www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/06/30/the-real-reason-so-many-millennials-are-living-at-home/.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2015). Long‐distance relationships. In Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., Wilson, S. R., Dillard, J. P., Caughlin, J. P., & Solomon, D. (eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–3). New York: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic075Google Scholar

Standlee, A. (2019). Friendship and online filtering: The use of social media to construct offline social networks. New Media & Society, 21(3), 770–785. doi:10.1177/1461444188806844Google Scholar

Steele, R. G., Hall, J. A. & Christofferson, J. L. (2019). Conceptualizing digital stress in adolescents and young adults: Toward the development of an empirically based model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23(1), 15–26, doi:10.1007/s10567-019-00300-5Google Scholar

Steers, M.-L. N., Wickham, R. E., & Acitelli, L. K. (2014). Seeing everyone else’s highlight reels: How Facebook usage is linked to depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(8), 701–731.Google Scholar

Stepanikova, I., Nie, N. H., & He, X. (2010). Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 329–338. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.002Google Scholar

Stevenson, M. (2018). From hypertext to hype and back again: Exploring the roots of social media in early web culture. In Burgess, J., Marwick, A., & Poell, T. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 69–88). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Stieger, S., & Lewetz, D. (2018). A week without using social media: Results from an ecological momentary intervention study using smartphones. Cyberpsycholgy, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(10), 618–624. doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0070Google Scholar

Stone, A. R. (1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Wibowo, K. A., & Nanni, D. P. (2017). What have we learned about social media by studying Facebook? A decade in review. New Media & Society, 19(6), 968–980. doi:10.1177/1461444817695745Google Scholar

Sutcliffe, A., Dunbar, R., Binder, J., & Arrow, H. (2012). Relationships and the social brain: Integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives. British Journal of Psychology, 103(2), 149–168. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02061.xGoogle Scholar

Taylor, S. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2018). Revisiting media multiplexity: A longitudinal analysis of media use in romantic relationships. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1104–1126. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy055Google Scholar

Terrell, J. E. (2015). A talent for friendship: Rediscovery of a remarkable trait. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomée, S., Härenstam, A., & Hagberg, M. (2011). Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults – A prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 11(66), 1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-66Google Scholar

Thompson, A. K. (2018). Creative quest. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Thulin, E., & Vilhelmson, B. (2005). Virtual mobility of urban youth: ICT‐based communication in Sweden. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 477–487. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00480.xGoogle Scholar

Tillema, T., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2010). Face-to-face and electronic communications in maintaining social networks: The influence of geographical and relational distance and of information content. New Media & Society, 12(6), 965–983. doi:10.1177/146144480953011Google Scholar

Tinbergen, N. (1951/1970). An attempt at a synthesis. In Russell, W. A. (ed.), Milestones in motivation: Contribution to the psychology of drive and purpose (pp. 53–79). New York: Meredith Corporation. (Reprinted from The study of instinct (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951).)Google Scholar

Tokunaga, R. S. (2016a). An examination of functional difficulties from Internet use: Media habit and displacement theory explanations. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 339–370. doi:10.1111/hcre/12081Google Scholar

Tokunaga, R. S. (2016b). Interpersonal surveillance over social network sites: Applying a theory of negative relational maintenance and the investment model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(2), 171–190. doi:10.1177/02654075168749Google Scholar

Tokunaga, R. S., & Rains, S. A. (2016). A review and meta-analysis examining conceptual and operational definitions of problematic Internet use. Human Communication Research, 42(2), 165–199. doi:10.111/hcre.12075Google Scholar

Toma, C. L., & D’Angelo, J. D. (2017). Connecting profile-to-profile: How people self-present and form impressions of others through online dating profiles. In Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. & Wrench, J. S. (eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 147–162). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Tong, S. T., van der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549. doi:10.111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.xGoogle Scholar

Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and computer-mediated communication. In Wright, K. & Webb, L. (eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98–118). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Tong, S. T., & Walther, J. B. (2015). The confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 42(2), 186–212. doi:10.1177/0093650212466257Google Scholar

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2008). The evolutionary psychology of emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 114–137). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Tosun, L. P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing “true self” on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1510–1517. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.018Google Scholar

Tromholt, M. (2016). The Facebook experiment: Quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(11), 661–666. doi:10.1089/cyber.2016.0259Google Scholar

Trottier, D. (2012). Interpersonal surveillance on social media. Canadian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 319–332. doi:10.22230/cjc.2012v37n2a2536Google Scholar

Tskhay, K. O. & Rule, N. O. (2014). Perceptions of personality in text-based media and OSN: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.004Google Scholar

Tufecki, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook, and MySpace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate? Information, Communication, & Society, 11(4), 544–564. doi:10.1080/13691180801999050Google Scholar

Tufekci, Z. (2010, May). Who acquires friends through social media and why? “Rich get richer” versus “seek and ye shall find.” In Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Turel, O., Cavagnaro, D. R., Meshi, D. (2018). Short abstinence from online social networking sites reduces perceived stress, especially in excessive users. Psychiatry Research, 270, 947–953. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.017Google Scholar