Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:23:18.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foreword

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Vincent Mor
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Tiziana Leone
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Anna Maresso
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Foreword

A key but neglected issue in long-term care is how different countries ensure that nursing homes, home care agencies and residential care facilities provide good-quality care. Although countries employ a number of strategies to accomplish this goal, the most common approach is regulation – to establish mandatory, government or government agent-imposed quality standards (Wiener et al., 2007a, 2007b). In most cases, these government regulations or other standards set the minimum quality that providers must meet to operate or to receive government funding. The role of government regulation in long-term care varies widely across countries, within countries and across services. In most countries, long-term care is heavily financed by the public sector (European Commission, 2012; OECD, 2005). Thus, governments have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that the public’s money is well spent. This book fills an important gap by analysing how a large number of countries around the world regulate the quality of long-term care services and the extent to which they make the results of their inspections and other information on quality available to the public.

Although some countries, such as the United States, have well-established regulatory systems, others, such as China, do not. But having a well-established regulatory system does not guarantee that all providers establish high quality. For example, in the United States, 23 per cent of nursing homes in 2010 were cited for causing actual harm or placing residents in jeopardy (Harrington et al., 2011). Moreover, during that same year, the US Administration on Aging received 157,962 complaints from nursing home residents or their families about poor quality of care, problematic quality of life and violations of resident rights (US Administration on Aging, 2011). Additionally, almost nothing is known about the quality of residential care facilities because these providers are regulated at the state level using highly variable standards and the provision of personal care by home care agencies and individual providers is hardly regulated.

Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
An International Comparison
, pp. xvii - xxvi
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Healthcare Association (2013). LTS Stats: nursing facility operational characteristics report, December 2012. Washington, DC. Available at: .
European Commission (2012). The 2012 aging report: economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU member states (2010–2060). Brussels: European Union. Available at: .Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Harrington, C., Carrillo, H., Dowdell, M., Tang, P. P. and Blank, B. W. (2011). Nursing facilities, staffing, residents and facility deficiencies, 2005 through 2010. San Francisco: University of California, San Francisco. Available at: .Google Scholar
Jenkens, R., O’Keeffe, J., Carder, P. and Brown-Wilson, K. (2006). A study of negotiated risk agreements in assisted living facilities: Final report. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Available at: .Google Scholar
Johnson, R. W., Toomey, D., and Wiener, J. M. (2007). Meeting the long-term care needs of the baby boomers: how changing families will affect paid helpers and institutions. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Available at: .Google Scholar
Kane, R. A. (2001). Long-term care and a good quality of life: bringing them closer together. The Gerontologist, 41(3): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, R. A. (2003). Definition, measurement, and correlates of quality of life in nursing homes: Toward a reasonable practice, research, and policy agenda. The Gerontologist, 43 (Special Issue II): 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPlante, M., Kaye, H. S., Kang, T. and Harrington, C. (2004). Unmet need for personal assistance services: estimating the shortfall in hours of help and adverse consequences. Journal of Gerontology B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 59(2): S98–S108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Association for Home Care (2010). Basic statistics about home care. Washington, DC. Available at: .
National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform (1985). A Consumer perspective on quality care: the residents’ point of view. Washington, DC: National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform. Available at: .Google Scholar
Noelker, L. S., and Harel, Z. (eds.) (2000). Quality of Life and Quality of Care in Long-Term Care. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Long-Term Care for Older People. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006). Projecting OECD health and long-term care expenditures: What are the main drivers? Economics Department Working Paper No. 477. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Available at: .Google Scholar
Park-Lee, E., Caffrey, C., Sengupta, M., Moss, A. J., Rosenoff, E., Harris-Kojetin, L. D. (2011). Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States. NCHS data brief, no 78. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: .
US Administration on Aging (2011). 2010 National Ombudsman Reporting System data tables. Washington, DC. Available at: .Google Scholar
US Census Bureau (2009). International database. Washington, DC. Available at: .Google Scholar
US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2010). Nursing home data compendium, 2010 edition. Baltimore, MD. Retrieved from: .Google Scholar
US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2012). Report to Congress: Plan to implement Medicare skilled nursing facility value-based purchasing program. Available at: .Google Scholar
Walsh, E. G., Wiener, J. M., Haber, S., Bragg, A., Freiman, M., and Ouslander, J. G. (2012). Potentially avoidable hospitalizations of dually eligible Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries from nursing facility and home- and community-based services waiver programs. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 60(5): 821–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J. M., Freiman, M. P., and Brown, D. (2007a). Strategies for improving the quality of long-term care. Washington, DC: National Commission for Quality Long-Term Care. Available at: .Google Scholar
Wiener, J. M., Tilly, J., Cuellar, A. E., Howe, A., Doyle, C., Campbell, J., and Ikegami, N. (2007b). Quality assurance for long-term care: the experiences of England, Australia, Germany, and Japan. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute. Available at: .Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Foreword
  • Edited by Vincent Mor, Brown University, Rhode Island, Tiziana Leone, London School of Economics and Political Science, Anna Maresso, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
  • Online publication: 05 February 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323711.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Foreword
  • Edited by Vincent Mor, Brown University, Rhode Island, Tiziana Leone, London School of Economics and Political Science, Anna Maresso, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
  • Online publication: 05 February 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323711.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Foreword
  • Edited by Vincent Mor, Brown University, Rhode Island, Tiziana Leone, London School of Economics and Political Science, Anna Maresso, London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Book: Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
  • Online publication: 05 February 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323711.001
Available formats
×