Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T10:57:53.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Foreign Bodies

from Section IV - Medical Devices: Other Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Tim B. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Mihra S. Taljanovic
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Jason R. Wild
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography and Useful Links

Ashby, B S, Hunter-Craig, I D. Foreign-body perforations of the gut. Br J Surg 1967; 54: 382384.Google Scholar
Balch, C M, Silver, D. Foreign bodies in the appendix. Arch Surg 1971; 102: 1420.Google Scholar
Barone, J E, Sohn, N, Nelson, T F. Perforations and foreign bodies of the rectum: report of 28 cases. Ann Surg 1976; 184: 601604.Google Scholar
Beerman, R, Nunez, D, Wetli, C V. Radiographic evaluation of the cocaine smuggler. Gastrointest Radiol 1986; 11: 351354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrstock, B B, Petrakis, N L. A case report: permanent subcutaneous gold acupuncture needles. West J Med 1974; 121: 140142.Google Scholar
Berger, P E, Kuhn, J P, Kuhns, L R. Computed tomography and the occult tracheobroncheal foreign body. Radiology 1980; 134: 133135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodne, D, Quinn, S F, Cochran, C F. Imaging foreign glass and wooden bodies of the extremities with CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12: 608611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J C, Otjen, J P, Drugas, G T. Too attractive: the growing problem of magnet ingestions in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013: 29(11): 11701174.Google Scholar
Bundred, N J, Blackie, R A S, Kingsnorth, A N, Eremin, O. Hidden dangers of sliced bread. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 288: 17231724.Google Scholar
Bunker, P G. The role of dentistry in problems of foreign bodies in the air and food passages. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64: 782787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busch, D B, Starling, J R. Rectal foreign bodies: case reports and a comprehensive review of the world’s literature. Surgery 1986; 100: 512519.Google Scholar
Buzzard, A J, Waxman, B P. A long standing much travelled foreign body. Med J Aust 1979; 1: 600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaikhouni, A, Kratz, J M, Crawford, F A. Foreign bodies of the esophagus. Am Surg 1985; 51: 173179.Google ScholarPubMed
Champion, H R, Holcomb, J B, Young, L A. Injuries from explosions: physics, biophysics, pathology, and required research focus. J Trauma 2009; 66(5): 14681477; discussion 1477.Google ScholarPubMed
Classen, J N, Marten, R E, Sabagal, J. Iatrogenic lesions of the colon and rectum. South Med J 1975; 68: 14171428.Google Scholar
Crass, R A, Tranbaugh, R F, Kudsk, K A, Trundey, D D. Colorectal foreign bodies and perforations. Am J Surg 1981; 142: 8588.Google Scholar
Daffner, R H. Reviewing CT scout images: observations of an expert witness. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205(3): 589591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielson, K S, Hunter, T B. Barium capsules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144: 414.Google Scholar
deLacey, G, Evans, R, Sandin, B. Penetrating injuries: how easy is it to see glass (and plastic) on radiographs? Br J Radiol 1985; 58: 2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrentes, M. Wizardry and radiography: a clinical case. Radiology 1990; 177: 115116.Google Scholar
Dhawan, S S, Ryder, K M, Pritchard, E. Massive penny ingestion: the loot with local and systemic effects. J Emerg Med 2008; 35(1): 3337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodd, G D III, Budzik, R F Identification of retained firearm projectiles on plain radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 471475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorst, J P, Reichelderfer, T E, Sanders, R C. Radiodensity of the proposed new penny. Pediatrics 1982; 69: 224225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dula, A N, Virostko, J, Shellock, F G. Assessment of MRI issues at 7 T for 28 implants and other objects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202: 401405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eftaiha, M, Hambrick, E, Abcarian, H. Principles of management of colorectal foreign bodies. Arch Surg 1977; 112: 691695.Google Scholar
Eggli, K D, Potter, B M, Garcia, V, Altman, R P, Breckbill, D L. Delayed diagnosis of esophageal perforation by aluminum foreign bodies. Pediatr Radiol 1986; 16: 511513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldridge, W W. Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract. J Am Med Ass 1961; 178: 665666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshed, I, Kushnir, T, Shabshin, N, Konen, E. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with retained metal fragments from combat and terrorist attacks? Acta Radiol 2010; 51(2): 170174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fornage, B D, Schemberg, F L. Sonographic diagnosis of foreign bodies of the distal extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 567569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R C. Foreign bodies in the rectum and colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1965; 8: 123127.Google Scholar
Garner, J, Brett, S J. Mechanisms of injury by explosive devices. Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 25(1): 147160.Google Scholar
Gharib, S D, Berger, D L, Choy, G, Huck, A E. Case 21–2015: a 37-year-old American man living in Vietnam, with fever and bacteremia. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(2): 174183.Google Scholar
Gimber, L H, Melville, D M, Klauser, A S, et al. Artifacts at musculoskeletal US: resident and fellow education feature. RadioGraphics 2016; 36(2): 479480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glauten, A, Austin, J H M. Permanent subcutaneous acupuncture needles: radiographic manifestations. J Can Assoc Radiol 1988; 398: 5456.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, L R, Howland, M A, Kirstein, R H. Arsenic. In: Goldfrank, L R, Flomebraum, N E, Lewin, N A, et al., eds. Toxicologic Emergencies. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1986; 609618.Google Scholar
Gooding, A W, Hardiman, T, Sumers, M, Stress, R, Graf, P, Grunfeld, C. Sonography of the hand and foot in foreign body detection. J Ultrasound Med 1987; 6: 441447.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. Non-metallic foreign bodies (letter). Br J Radiol 1985; 58: 574.Google Scholar
Gray, J R, Khalil, A, Prior, J C. Acute arsenic toxicity: an opaque poison. J Can Assoc Radiol 1989; 40: 226227.Google Scholar
Guelfguat, M, Kaplinskiy, V, Reddy, S H, DiPoce, J. Clinical guidelines for imaging and reporting ingested foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 3753.Google Scholar
Guindi, M M, Troster, M M, Valley, V M. Three cases of an unusual foreign body in small bowel. Gastrointest Radiol 1987; 12: 240242.Google Scholar
Gunn, A. Intestinal perforation due to swallowed fish or meat bone. Lancet 1966; 1: 125128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, R M, Reichelderfer, T E, Dorst, J P, Oh, K S. The problem with the replacement of copper pennies by aluminum pennies. Pediatrics 1974; 54: 684688.Google Scholar
Hilfer, R J, Mandel, A. Acute arsenic intoxication diagnosed by roentgenograms. N Engl J Med 1962; 266: 663664.Google Scholar
Himadi, G M, Fischer, G J. Magnetic removal of foreign bodies from the upper gastrointestinal tract. Radiology 1977; 123: 226227.Google Scholar
Hollerman, J J, Fackler, M L. Bullet, pellets, and wound ballistics. In: Hunter, T B, Bragg, D G, eds. Radiologic Guide to Medical Devices and Foreign Bodies. St Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1994.Google Scholar
Horrocks, C L. Blast injuries: biophysics, pathophysiology and management principles. JR Army Med Corps. 2001; 147(1): 2840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, L K, Jacobson, J A, Powell, A, Fessell, D P, Hayes, C W. Sonography and radiography of soft-tissue foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 11551159.Google Scholar
Humphry, A, Holland, W G. Unsuspected esophageal foreign bodies. J Can Assoc Radiol 1981; 32: 1720.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B. Bottle cap ingestion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 411412.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B. Magnetic pull from outer space (letter). AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 14981499.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Bragg, D G, eds. Radiologic Guide to Medical Devices and Foreign Bodies. St Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1994.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Hirai Gimber, L. Identification of retained surgical foreign objects: policy at a University Medical Center. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7(9): 736738.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Taljanovic, M S. Foreign bodies. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 731757.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, S O, Jue, T L, Anderson, M A, et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endos 2011; 73(6): 10851091.Google Scholar
Imray, T J, Hiramatsu, Y. Radiographic manifestations of Japanese acupuncture. Radiology 1975; 115: 625626.Google Scholar
Jackson, C L. Foreign bodies in the esophagus. Am J Surg 1957; 93: 308312.Google Scholar
Jaffe, R B, Corneli, H M. Fluoroscopic removal of ingested alkaline batteries. Radiology 1984; 150: 585586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamison, M H, Davis, R W W, Maclennan, I. A plastic bread-bag clip: cause of intermittent intestinal obstruction. Br J Clin Pract 1983; 37: 402403.Google Scholar
Karlsson, M K, Hasserius, R, Gerdhem, P, et al. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 620627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellermann, A L, Peleg, K. Lessons from Boston. N Engl J Med 2013; 368(21): 19561957.Google Scholar
Kraker, D A. Foreign bodies in the rectum and sigmoid. Am J Surg 1935; 29: 449450.Google Scholar
Kuhns, D W, Dire, D J. Button battery ingestions. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18: 293300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laberke, P J, Blum, S, Waelti, S, et al. Systematic evaluation of radiation dose reduction in CT studies of body packers: accuracy down to submillisievert levels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206: 740746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, J T K, Ong, G B. Broken and retained rectal thermometers in infants and young children. Aust Pediatr J 1981; 17: 9394.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, R L, Vargas, B. Stones in the urinary bladder in children and young adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 491495.Google Scholar
Lotan, E, Portnoy, O, Konen, E, Simon, D, Guranda, L. The role of early postmortem CT in the evaluation of support line misplacement in patients with severe trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: 37.Google Scholar
Maddu, K K, Mittal, P, Day Arepali, C, et al. Colorectal emergencies and related complications: a comprehensive imaging review-noninfectious and noninflammatory emergencies of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 12171229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maglinte, D D T, Taylor, S D, Ng, A C. Gastrointestinal perforation by chicken bones. Radiology 1979; 130: 597599.Google Scholar
Maleki, M, Evans, W E. Foreign body perforation of the intestinal tract: report of 12 cases and review of the literature. Arch Surg 1970; 101: 475477.Google Scholar
McCord, G S, Clouse, R E. Pill-induced esophageal strictures: clinical features and risk factors for development. Am J Med 1990; 88: 512518.Google Scholar
McPherson, R C, Karlon, M, Williams, R D. Foreign body perforation of the intestinal tract. Am J Surg 1957; 94: 564566.Google Scholar
Meyer, J E, Kopans, D B, Mueller, P R. Preoperative localization of radiopaque foreign bodies. Radiology 1982; 144: 179.Google Scholar
Morales, L, Rovida, J, Mongrad, M, Sancho, M A, Bach, A. Intraspinal migration of rectal foreign body. J Pediatr Surg 1983; 18: 634635.Google Scholar
Morris, C C. Pediatric iron poisonings in the United States. South Med J 2000; 93(4): 352358.Google Scholar
Muhletaler, C A, Gerlock, A J, Shull, H S, Adkins, R B The pill bottle dessicant: a cause of partial gastrointestinal obstruction. J Am Med Ass 1980; 242: 19211922.Google Scholar
Mustafa, B F, Samaan, M, Langmead, L, Khasraw, M. Small bowel video capsule endoscopy: an overview. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 7(4): 323329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naidich, T P, Bartelt, D, Wheeler, PS, Stern, W Z. Metallic mercury emboli. AJR Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1973; 117: 886891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nandi, P, Ong, G B. Foreign body in the esophagus: review of 2394 cases. Br J Surg 1978; 65: 59.Google Scholar
Neumann, H, Fry, L C, Nagel, A, Neurath, M E. Wireless capsule endoscopy of the small intestine: a review and future directions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2014; 30(5): 463471.Google Scholar
Ngan, J H K, Fox, P J, Lai, E C S, et al. A prospective study on fish bone ingestion: experience of 358 patients. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 459462.Google Scholar
Pawa, S, Khalifa, A J, Ehrinpreis, M N, Schiffer, C A, Siddiqui, F A. Zinc toxicity from massive and prolonged coin ingestion in an adult. Am J Med Sci 2008; 335(5): 430433.Google Scholar
Peterson, J J, Bancroft, L W, Kransdorf, M J. Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 557562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, N, Harvey-Smith, W, Rohrmann, C A Radiographic aspects of metallic mercury embolism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 135: 10791081.Google Scholar
Poletti, P A, Canel, L, Becker, C D, et al. Screeing of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT. Radiology 2012; 265(3): 772779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, K K, Woods, R W, Bailey, P D, Scott, W W, Johnson, P T. Positive control radiographs for identifying a suspected retained surgical item. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12: 830832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, J, Dewar, G A, Metreweli, C. Airgun pellet appendicitis. Australas Radiol 1988; 32: 368370.Google Scholar
Proud, W G. The physical basis of explosion and blast injury process. JR Army Med Corps 2013; 159(Suppl 1): i49.Google Scholar
Pugmire, B S, Lim, R, Avery, L L. Review of ingested and aspirated foreign bodies in children and their clinical significance for radiologists. RadioGraphics 2015; 35(5): 15281538.Google Scholar
Rappaport, W, Haynes, K. The retained surgical sponge following intra-abdominal surgery. Arch Surg 1990; 125: 405407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebell, F G. The problem of foreign bodies in the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1948; 76: 678686.Google Scholar
Richter, R M, Littman, L. Endoscopic extraction of an unusual colonic foreign body. Gastrointest Endosc 1975; 22: 4045.Google Scholar
Rivron, R P, Jones, D R B. A hazard of modern life (letter). Lancet 1983; 2: 334.Google Scholar
Roberts, I S, Benamore, R E, Benbow, E W, et al. Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 2012; 379(9811): 136142.Google Scholar
Rondonotti, E, Soncini, M, Girelli, C, et al. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 22(11): 13801386.Google Scholar
Rosser, C. Foreign bodies of the rectum. Texas State J Med 1931; 27: 2324.Google Scholar
Saenz, L, Lee, H, Mottram, M. Permanent acupuncture needles. J Am Med Ass 1978; 240: 14821483.Google Scholar
Schatz, C J, Fordham, S. Acupuncture needles: a “new” foreign body in the ear. Am J Roentgenol 1976; 127: 688689.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S, Hugli, O, Rizzo, E, et al. Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets-diagnostic value of unenhanced CT. Eur J Radiol 2008; 67(1): 133138.Google Scholar
Scholing, M, Saltzherr, T P, Fung Kon Jin, P H, et al. The value of postmortem computed tomography as an alternative for autopsy in trauma victims: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 2009; 19(10): 23332341.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G F, Polsky, H S. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract. Am Surg 1976; 42: 236238.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J T, Graham, D Y. Toothpick perforation of the intestines. Ann Surg 1977; 185: 6466.Google Scholar
Segal, I, Nouri, M A, Hamilton, D G, et al. Foreign body ileitis: a case report. S Afr Med J 1980; 588: 421422.Google Scholar
Selivanov, V, Sheldon, G F, Cello, J P, Crass, R A. Management of foreign body ingestion. Ann Surg 1984; 199: 187191.Google Scholar
Shaffer, H A, Alfred, B A, deLange, E E, Meyer, G A, McIlhenny, J. Basket extraction of esophageal foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147: 10101013.Google Scholar
Shellock, F G, ed. Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Health Effects and Safety. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2001.Google Scholar
Shellock, F G, Karacozoff, A M. Detection of implants and other objects using a ferromagnetic detection system: implications for patient screening before MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201: 720725.Google Scholar
Singeap, A M, Trifan, A, Cojocariu, C, Sfarti, C, Stanciu, C. Outcomes after symptomatic capsule retention in suspected small bowel obstruction. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23(10): 886890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, A K, Goralnick, E, Velmahos, G, et al. Radiologic freatures of injuries from the Boston Marathon bombing at three hospitals. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: 235239.Google Scholar
Singh, A K, Ditkofsky, N G, York, J D, et al. Blast injuries: from improvised explosive device blasts to the Boston Marathon bombing. RadioGraphics 2016; 36: 295307.Google Scholar
Smith, P C, Swischuk, L E, Fagan, C V. Elusive and often unsuspected cause of stridor or pneumonia (esophageal foreign body). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1974; 122: 8089.Google Scholar
Spiegel, S M, Hyams, B B. Radiographic demonstration of a toxic agent. J Can Assoc Radiol 1984; 35: 204205.Google Scholar
Spizarny, D L, Renzi, P. Metallic mercury pulmonary emboli. J Can Assoc Radiol 1987; 38: 6061.Google Scholar
Spouge, A R, Weisbrod, G L, Herman, S J, Chamberlain, D W. Wooden foreign body in the lung parenchyma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 9991001.Google Scholar
Staple, T W, McAlister, W H. Roentgenographic visualization of iron preparations in the gastrointestinal tract. Radiology 1964; 83: 10511056.Google Scholar
Studley, J G N, Linehan, I P, Ogilvie, A L, Dowling, B L. Swallowed button batteries: is there a consensus on management? Gut 1990; 31: 867870.Google Scholar
Sturdy, J H, Baird, R M, Gerein, A N. Surgical sponges: a cause of granuloma and adhesion formation. Ann Surg 1967; 165: 128134.Google Scholar
Sutton, G. Hidden dangers of sliced bread (letter). Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984; 288: 1995.Google Scholar
Taljanovic, M S, Hunter, T B, Freundlich, I M. Misplaced devices in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis: part I. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2006a; 27: 7897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taljanovic, M S, Hunter, T B, Freundlich, I M. Misplaced devices in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis: part II. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2006b; 27: 98110.Google Scholar
Tandberg, D. Glass in hand and foot: will x-ray film show it? J Am Med Ass 1982; 248: 18721874.Google Scholar
Vizcarrondo, F J, Brady, P G, Nord, H J. Foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc 1983; 29: 208210.Google Scholar
Volle, E, Hand, D, Berger, P, Kaufman, H J. Ingested foreign bodies: removal by magnet. Radiology 1986; 160: 407409.Google Scholar
Walter, W R, Amis, E S, Sprayregen, S, Haramati, L B. Intraoperative radiography for surgical miscounts. J Am Coll Radiol 2015; 12: 824829.Google Scholar
Webb, W A. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract: update. Gastrointest Endos 1995; 41: 3951.Google Scholar
Wenzel, V, Tuttle, R J, Zylak, C J. Intravenous self-administration of metallic mercury. Radiology 1980; 137: 313315.Google Scholar
Wilson, A J. Gunshot injuries: what does a radiologist need to know? RadioGraphics 1999; 19: 13581368.Google Scholar
Wolf, L, Geracy, K. Colonoscopic removal of balloons from the bowel. Gastrointest Endosc 1977; 24: 4144.Google Scholar
Yildiz, S Y, Kendirci, M, Akbulut, S, et al. Colorectal emergencies associated with penetrating or retained foreign bodies. World J Emerg Surg 2013; 8: 25.Google Scholar
Zelegman, B E, Feinberg, L E, Johnson, E D. A complication of cleansing enema: retained protective shield of the enema tip. Gastrointest Radiol 1986; 11: 372374.Google Scholar
Ziter, F M Intestinal perforation in adults due to ingested opaque foreign bodies. Am J Gastroenterol 1976; 68: 382385.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×