Aharonov, D., Kitaev, A., and Nisan, N. 1998. Quantum circuits with mixed states. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). New York, NY: ACM.

Aharonov, Y., Anandan, J., and Vaidman, L. 1993. Meaning of the wave function. Phys. Rev. A, 47, 4616–4626.Google Scholar

Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L. 1993. Measurement of the Schrödinger wave of a single particle. Phys. Lett. A, 178, 38–42.Google Scholar

Alfsen, E. M. and Shultz, F. W. 2001. State Spaces of Operator Algebras: Basic Theory, Orientations, and C*-products. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.

Alfsen, E. M. and Shultz, F. W. 2003. Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.

Alicki, R. and Lendi, K. 1987. Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 286. Berlin: Springer.

Alter, O. and Yamamoto, Y. 1995. Inhibition of the measurement of the wave function of a single quantum system in repeated weak quantum nondemolition measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 4106–4109.Google Scholar

Araki, H. 1980. On a characterization of the state space of quantum mechanics. Comm. Math. Phys., 75(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Barnum, H., Nielsen, M. A., and Schumacher, B. 1998. Information transmission through a noisy quantum channel. Phys. Rev. A, 57, 4153–4175.Google Scholar

Barnum, H., Gaebler, C. P., and Wilce, A. 2009. Ensemble steering, weak self-duality, and the structure of probabilistic theories. arXiv, quant-ph.

Barnum, H., Mueller, M. P., and Ududec, C. 2014. Higher-order interference and singlesystem postulates characterizing quantum theory. arXiv:1403.4147.

Barrett, J. 2007. Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories. Phys. Rev. A, 75(3), 032304.Google Scholar

Barvinok, A. 2002. A Course in Convexity. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Baumeler, Ä. and Wolf, S. 2015. Device-independent test of causal order and relations to fixed-points. arXiv.org.

Belavkin, V. P. and Staszewski, P. 1986. A Radon Nikodym theorem for completely positive maps. Rep. Math. Phys., 24, 49–53.Google Scholar

Belavkin, V. P., D'Ariano, G. M., and Raginsky, M. 2005. Operational distance and fidelity for quantum channels. J. Math. Phys., 46(6), 062106.Google Scholar

Béllissard, J. and Iochum, B. 1978. Homogeneous self-dual cones, versus Jordan algebras: the theory revisited. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 28(1), v, 27–67.Google Scholar

Beltrametti, E. G., Cassinelli, G., Rota, G.-C., and Carruthers, P. A. 2010. The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Vol. 15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bennett, C. H. and Wiesner, S. J. 1992. Communication via one-and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. lett., 69(20), 2881.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., et al. 1984. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 175. New York: IEEE.

Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., and Wootters, W. K. 1993. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70(13), 1895.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S., and Schumacher, B. 1996. Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. Phys. Rev. A, 53, 2046.Google Scholar

Bernstein, E. and Vazirani, U. 1993. Quantum complexity theory. Pages 11–20 of: Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. New York, NY: ACM.

Bhatia, R. 1997. Matrix Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Birkhoff, G. 1984. Lattice theory. In: Dilworth, R. P. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Symposium in Pure Mathematics of the American Mathematical Society April 1959, vol. 175. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J. 1936. The logic of quantum mechanics. Math. Annal., 37, 823.Google Scholar

Bisio, A., Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., Facchini, S., and Perinotti, P. 2009a. Optimal quantum tomography. IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Elec., 15(6), 1646.Google Scholar

Bisio, A., Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., Facchini, S., and Perinotti, P. 2009b. Optimal quantum tomography of states, measurements, and transformations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(1), 010404.Google Scholar

Bisio, A., Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2012. Quantum networks: general theory and applications. Acta Phys. Slovaca, 61(1), 273–390.Google Scholar

Brandenburger, A. and Yanofsky, N. 2008. A classification of hidden-variable properties. J. Phys. A, 41(42), 425302.Google Scholar

Brassard, G. 2005. Is information the key? Nature Phys., 1(1), 2–4.Google Scholar

Brukner, C. 2014a. Bounding quantum correlations with indefinite causal order. arXiv.org.

Brukner, C. 2014b. Quantum causality. Nature Phys., 10(4), 259–263.Google Scholar

Bruss, D., D'Ariano, G. M., Macchiavello, C., and Sacchi, M. F. 2000. Approximate quantum cloning and the impossibility of superluminal information transfer. Phys. Rev. A, 62(6), 062302.Google Scholar

Buscemi, F., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2004. There exist nonorthogonal quantum measurements that are perfectly repeatable. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 070403.Google Scholar

Buscemi, F., Chiribella, G., and D'Ariano, G. M. 2005. Inverting quantum decoherence by classical feedback from the environment. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 090501.Google Scholar

Busch, P., Lahti, P. J., and Mittelstaedt, P. 1991. The Quantum Theory of Measurement. Berlin: Springer.

Childs, A. M., Chuang, I. L., and Leung, D. W. 2001. Realization of quantum process tomography in NMR. Phys. Rev. A, 64(Jun), 012314.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G. and Spekkens, R. (eds). 2015. Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils. Japan: Springer Verlag.

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Schlingemann, D. 2007. How continuous quantum measurements in finite dimensions are actually discrete. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(19), 190403.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2008a. Quantum circuit architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101(6), 060401.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2008b. Optimal cloning of unitary transformation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 180504.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2008c. Quantum circuit architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 060401.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2009. Theoretical framework for quantum networks. Phys. Rev. A, 80(2), 022339.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2010a. Probabilistic theories with purification. Phys. Rev. A, 81(6), 062348.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Schlingemann, D. 2010b. Barycentric decomposition of quantum measurements in finite dimensions. J. Math. Phys., 51(2), 022111.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2010c. Probabilistic theories with purification. Phys. Rev. A, 81(6), 062348.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2011. Informational derivation of quantum theory. Phys. Rev. A, 84(1), 012311.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., Perinotti, P., and Valiron, B. 2013a. Quantum computations without definite causal structure. Phys. Rev. A, 88(Aug), 022318.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2013b. A short impossibility proof of quantum bit commitment. Phys. Lett. A, 377, 1076–1087.Google Scholar

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2014. Non-causal theories with purification. arxiv.

Chiribella, G., D'Ariano, G. M., and Perinotti, P. 2015. Non-causal theories with purification. in preparation.

Choi, M.-D. 1972. Positive linear linear maps on C* algebras. Canad. J. Math., XXIV(3), 520–529.Google Scholar

Choi, M.-D. 1975. Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices. Linear Algebra Appl., 10, 285–290.Google Scholar

Chuang, I. L. and Nielsen, M. A. 2000. Quantum Information and Quantum Computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clifton, R., Bub, J., and Halvorson, H. 2003. Characterizing quantum theory in terms of information-theoretic constraints. Foundations of Phys., 33(11), 1561–1591.Google Scholar

Coecke, B. 2008. Introducing categories to the practicing physicist. Adv. Stud. Math. Logic, 30, 45.Google Scholar

Coecke, B. 2006. Introducing categories to the practicing physicist. Pages 289–355 of: What is Category Theory? Advanced Studies in Mathematics and Logic, vol. 30. Milan, Italy: Polimetrica Publishing.

Coecke, B., Moore, D., and Wilce, A. 2000. Current research in operational quantum logic: algebras, categories, languages. Vol. 111. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Cox, R. T. 1961. The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore, OH: Johns Hopkins University.

Dakic, B. and Brukner, C. 2011. Quantum theory and beyond: is entanglement special? Pages 365–392 of: Halvorson, H. (ed.), Deep Beauty: Understanding the Quantum World through Mathematical Innovation. Cambridge University Press.

D'Ariano, G. M. 1997. Homodyning as universal detection. Pages 365–392 of: Hirota, O., Holevo, A. S., and Caves, C. M. (eds), Quantum Communication, Computing and Measurement. New York and London: Plenum.

D'Ariano, G. M. 2005. Homodyning as universal detection. Pages 494–508 of: Hayashi, M. (ed.), Asymptotic Theory of Quantum Statistical Inference, Selected Papers. Singapore: World Scientific.

D'Ariano, G. M. 2006a. How to derive the Hilbert-space formulation of quantum mechanics from purely operational axioms. In: Bassi, A., Duerr, D., Weber, T., and Zanghi, N. (eds), Quantum Mechanics, vol. 844. USA: American Institute of Physics.

D'Ariano, G. M. 2006b. On the missing axiom of Quantum Mechanics. Pages 114–130 of: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 810.

D'Ariano, G. M. 2007a. Operational axioms for a C*,-algebraic formulation for Quantum Mechanics. Page 191 of: Hirota, O., Shapiro, J. H., and Sasaki, M. (eds), Proceedings of the 8th Int. Conf. on Quantum Communication, Measurement and Computing. Japan: NICT press.

D'Ariano, G. M. 2007b. Operational axioms for quantum mechanics. Page 79 of: Adenier, G., Fuchs, C. A., and Khrennikov, A. Yu. (eds), AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 889. USA: American Institute of Physics.

D'Ariano, G. M. 2010. Probabilistic theories: what is special about quantum mechanics? Chap. 5 of: Bokulich, A. and Jaeger, G. (eds), Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D'Ariano, G. M. and Lo Presti, P. 2001. Quantum tomography for measuring experimentally the matrix elements of an arbitrary quantum operation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(May), 4195–4198.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M. and Lo Presti, P. 2003. Imprinting a complete information about a quantum channel on its output state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 047902.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M. and Perinotti, P. 2005. Efficient universal programmable quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. lett., 94(9), 090401.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M. and Perinotti, P. 2007. Optimal data processing for quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 020403.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M. and Tosini, A. 2010. Testing axioms for quantum theory on probabilistic toy-theories. Quantum Inf. Proc., 9, 95–141.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M. and Tosini, A. 2013. Emergence of space-time from topologically homogeneous causal networks. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

D'Ariano, G. M. and Yuen, H. P. 1996. Impossibility of measuring the wave function of a single quantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(Apr), 2832–2835.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Macchiavello, C., and Paris, M. G. A. 1994. Detection of the density matrix through optical homodyne tomography without filtered back projection. Phys. Rev. A, 50(Nov), 4298–4302.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Lo Presti, P., and Sacchi, M. 2000. Bell measurements and observables. Phys. Lett. A, 272, 32.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Lo Presti, P., and Perinotti, P. 2005. Classical randomness in quantum measurements. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38(26), 5979–5991.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Giovannetti, V., and Perinotti, P. 2006. Optimal estimation of quantum observables. J. of Math. Phys., 47, 022102–1.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Kretschmann, D., Schlingemann, D., and Werner, R. F. 2007. Reexamination of quantum bit commitment: the possible and the impossible. Phys. Rev. A, 76, 032328.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Manessi, F., and Perinotti, P. 2014a. Determinism without causality. Physica Scripta, T163, 014013.Google Scholar

D'Ariano, G. M., Manessi, F., Perinotti, P., and Tosini, A. 2014b. Fermionic computation is non-local tomographic and violates monogamy of entanglement. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 107(2), 20009.Google Scholar

Davies, E. B. 1977. Quantum dynamical semigroups and the neutron diffusion equation. Rep. Math. Phys., 11, 169.Google Scholar

Dieks, D. G. B. J. 1982. Communication by EPR devices. Phys. Lett. A, 92(6), 271–272.Google Scholar

Dowe, P. 2007. Physical Causation. Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction and Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eberhard, P. H. 1978. Bell's theorem and the different concepts of locality. Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11, 46(2), 392–419.Google Scholar

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. 1935. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev., 47(10), 777–780.Google Scholar

Ekert, A. K. 1991. Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67(6), 661.Google Scholar

Ellis, G. F. R. 2008. On the flow of time. arXiv preprint arXiv:0812.0240.

Feynman, R. 1965. The Character of Physical Law. London: BBC Books.

Foulis, D. J. and Randall, C. H. 1984. A note on misunderstandings of Piron's axioms for quantum mechanics. Found. Phys., 14, 65–88.Google Scholar

Foulis, D. J., Piron, C., and Randall, C. H. 1983. Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics. Found. Phys., 13, 813–841.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C. A. 2002. Quantum mechanics as quantum information (and only a little more). arXiv preprint quant-ph/0205039.

Fuchs, C. A. 2003. Quantum mechanics as quantum information, mostly. J. of Modern Optics, 50(6-7), 987–1023.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C. A. and Schack, R. 2013. Quantum-Bayesian coherence. Rev. Mod. Phys., 85, 1693–1715.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C. A., et al. 2001. Quantum foundations in the light of quantum information. NATO Science Series Sub Series III Comp. Syst. Sci., 182, 38–82.Google Scholar

Ghirardi, G.-C., Rimini, A., and Weber, T. 1980. A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process. Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento (1971–1985), 27(10), 293–298.Google Scholar

Gillies, D. 2000. Philosophical Theories of Probability. Move Psychology Press.

Gordon, J. P. and Louisell, W. H. 1966. Simultaneous measurements of noncommuting observables. Phys. of Quantum Elec., 1, 833–840.Google Scholar

Gorini, V., Kossakowski, A., and Sudarshan, E. C. G. 1976. Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems. J. Math. Phys., 17, 821.Google Scholar

Goyal, P., Knuth, K. H., and Skilling, J. 2010. Origin of complex quantum amplitudes and Feynman's rules. Phys. Rev. A, 81(Feb), 022109.Google Scholar

Gregoratti, M. and Werner, R. F. 2003. Quantum lost and found. Journal of Modern Optics, 50(6-7), 915–933.Google Scholar

Gross, D., Müller, M., Colbeck, R., and Dahlsten, O. C. O. 2010. All reversible dynamics in maximally nonlocal theories are trivial. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104(Feb), 080402.Google Scholar

Grover, L. K. 1996. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. Pages 212–219 of: Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. STOC–96. New York, NY: ACM.

Haag, R. 1993. Local Quantum Physics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Haag, R. and Haag, R. 1996. Local Quantum Physics: Fields, Particles, Algebras, Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer.

Hardy, L. 2001. Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms. arXiv:quant-ph/0101012.

Hardy, L. 2011. Reformulating and reconstructing quantum theory. quant-ph, Apr.

Hardy, L. and Wootters, W. K. 2012. Limited holism and real-vector-space quantum theory. Found. Phys., 42(3), 454–473.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. 1930. The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Trans. C., Eckart and F. C., Hoyt. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Helstrom, C. W. 1976. Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory.Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 123. New York NY: Academic Press.

Herbert, N. 1982. FLASH – A superluminal communicator based upon a new kind of quantum measurement. Found. Phys., 12, 1171.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D., von Neumann, J., and Nordheim, L. 1928. Über die Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Mathematische Annalen, 98(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

Holevo, A. S. 1982. Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory. Series in Statistics and Probability, vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Holevo, A. S. 2011. The Choi–Jamiolkowski forms of quantum Gaussian channels. J. Math. Phys., 52(4), 042202.Google Scholar

Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., and Horodecki, R. 1996. Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A, 223, 1–8.Google Scholar

Imamoglu, A. 1993. Logical reversibility in quantum-nondemolition measurements. Phys. Rev. A, 47, R4577–R4580.Google Scholar

Jamiolkowski, A. 1972. Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiteness of operators. Rep. Math. Phys., 3, 275.Google Scholar

Jauch, J. M. and Piron, C. 1963. Can hidden variables be excluded in quantum mechanics? Helv. Phys. Acta, 36, 827.Google Scholar

Jaynes, E. T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, D. and Feige, U. (eds) 2007. Toward a General Theory of Quantum Games. Vol. STOC–07 Symposium on Theory of Computing Conference. New York, NY: ACM.

Jordan, P., von Neumann, J., and Wigner, E. 1934. On an algebraic generalization of the quantum mechanical formalism. Ann. Math., 35, 29.Google Scholar

Joyal, A. and Street, R. 1991. The geometry of tensor calculus, I. Adv. Math., 88(1), 55–112.Google Scholar

Kaiser, D. 2011. How the Hippies Saved Physics: Science, Counterculture, and the Quantum Revival. New York: WW Norton & Company.

Kato, T. 1980. Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. New York, NY: Springer.

Keynes, J. M. 2004. A Treatise on Probability. Dover Books on Mathematics Series. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Knill, E. and Laflamme, R. 1997. Theory of quantum error-correcting codes. Phys. Rev. A, 55(Feb), 900–911.Google Scholar

Kretschmann, D. and Werner, R. F. 2005. Quantum channels with memory. Phys. Rev. A, 72, 062323.Google Scholar

Leung, D. 2001. Towards Robust Quantum Computation PhD thesis, Stanford University. Ljys, 48, 199.

Lindblad, G. 1999. A general no-cloning theorem. Lett. Math. Phys., 47(2), 189–196.Google Scholar

Lo, H.-K. and Chau, H. F. 1997. Is quantum bit commitment really possible? Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3410.Google Scholar

Ludwig, G. 1983. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Mac Lane, S. 1978. Categories for the Working Mathematician, Vol. 5. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

Mackey, G. W. 1963. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Masanes, L. and Müller, M. P. 2011. A derivation of quantum theory from physical requirements. New J. Phys., 13(6), 063001.Google Scholar

Masanes, L., Müller, M. P, Augusiak, R., and Pérez-Garćıa, D. 2013. Existence of an information unit as a postulate of quantum theory. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 110(41), 16373–16377.Google Scholar

Mayers, D. 1997. Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 3414.Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. A. and Chuang, I. L. 1997. Programmable quantum gate arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(2), 321–324.Google Scholar

Oreshkov, O., Costa, F., and Brukner, C. 2012. Quantum correlations with no causal order. Nature Commun., 3, 1092.Google Scholar

Ozawa, M. 1984. Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables. J. Math. Phys., 25, 79.Google Scholar

Ozawa, M. 1997. Quantum state reduction and the quantum bayes principle. Pages 233– 241 of: Hirota, O., Holevo, A. S., and Caves, C. M. (eds), Quantum Communication, Computing and Measurement. New York, NY: Plenum.

Paris, M. and Rehacek, J. 2004. Quantum State Estimation, Vol. 649. Berlin: Springer.

Parthasarathy, K. R. 1999. Extremal decision rules in quantum hypothesis testing. Infin. Dimens. Anal. Quantum. Probab. Relat. Top., 02(04), 557–568.Google Scholar

Paulsen, V. I. 1986. Completely Bounded Maps and Dilations. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.

Pearl, J. 2012. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Penrose, R. 1971. Applications of negative dimensional tensors. Pages 221–244 of: Welsh, D. J. A. (ed.), Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Piron, C. 1964. Axiomatique quantique. Helvetica Phys. Acta, 37(4-5), 439.Google Scholar

Piron, C. 1976. Foundations of Quantum Physics. Mathematical Physics Monograph Series. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.

Planck, M. 1941. Der Kausalbegriff in der Physik. Verlag von S. Hirzel.

Plenio, M. B. and Virmani, S. 2007. An introduction to entanglement measures. Quantum Inf. Comput., 7, 1.Google Scholar

Procopio, L. M, Moqanaki, A., Araújo, M., Costa, F., Alonso Calafell, I., Dowd, E. G., et al. 2015. Experimental superposition of orders of quantum gates. Nature Commun., 6(Aug.), 7913.Google Scholar

Rambo, T., Altepeter, J., D'Ariano, G. M., and Kumar, P. 2012. Functional quantum computing: an optical approach. arXiv:1211.1257.

Rockafellar, R. T. 2015. Convex Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Royer, A. 1994. Reversible quantum measurements on a spin 1/2 and measuring the state of a single system. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 913–917.Google Scholar

Royer, A. 1995. Reversible quantum measurements on a spin 1/2 and measuring the state of a single system (erratum). Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 1040–1040.Google Scholar

Russel, B. 1912. On the notion of cause. Proc. Aristotelian Soc., 13, 1–26.Google Scholar

Salmon, W. 1967. The Foundations Of Scientific Inference. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Salmon, W. C. 1998. Causality and Explanation: Wesley C. Salmon. Oxford Scholarship online. Oxford University Press.

Schrödinger, E. 1935a. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807–812; 823–828; 844–849.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. 1935b. Probability relations between separated systems. Pages 555–563 of: Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc, vol. 31. Cambridge Univ Press.

Schumacher, B. 1996. Sending entanglement through noisy quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A, 54, 2614–2628.Google Scholar

Schumacher, B. and Nielsen, M. A. 1996. Quantum data processing and error correction. Phys. Rev. A, 54, 2629–2635.Google Scholar

Schumacher, B. and Westmoreland, M. D. 2012. Modal quantum theory. Found. Phys., 42(7), 918–925.Google Scholar

Scott, A. J. and Grassl, M. 2009. SIC-POVMs: a new computer study. arXiv preprint arXiv:0910.5784.

Selinger, P. A Survey of Graphical Languages for Monoidal Categories. Available at www.mathstat.dal.ca/selinger/papers/graphical.pdf.

Selinger, P. 2011. A survey of graphical languages for monoidal categories. Pages 289–355 of: New Structures for Physics. Berlin: Springer.

Shor, P. W. 1997. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J. Comp., 26(5), 1484–1509.Google Scholar

Smithey, D. T., Beck, M., Raymer, M. G., and Faridani, A. 1993. Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: Application to squeezed states and the vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70(Mar), 1244–1247.Google Scholar

Solovay, R. M. 1970. A model of set theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable. Annals of Mathematics, 92, 1–56.Google Scholar

Ueda, M. and Kitagawa, M. 1992. Reversibility in quantum measurement processes. Phys.Rev. Lett., 68, 3424–3427.Google Scholar

Uhlmann, A. 1977. Relative entropy and the Wigner–Yanase–Dyson–Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory. Commun. Math. Phys., 54(1), 21–32.Google Scholar

Varadarajan, V. S. 1962. Probability in physics and a theorem on simultaneous observability. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 15, 189.Google Scholar

Vogel, K. and Risken, H. 1989. Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. Phys. Rev. A, 40(Sep), 2847–2849.Google Scholar

von Neumann, J. 1932. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Translated as Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1955. Chap. 4.

von Neumann, J. 1996. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press.

Werner, R. F. 1989. Quantum states with Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A, 40, 4277–4281.Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. 1990. Complexity, entropy and the physics of information. In: Zurek, W. H. (ed.), Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Proceedings of the 1988 Workshop on Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Santa Fe, New Mexico, May–June, 1989. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.

Wiesner, S. 1983. Conjugate coding. Sigact News, 15, 78.Google Scholar

Wilce, A. 2010. Formalism and interpretation in quantum theory. Foundations of Physics, 40(4), 434–462.Google Scholar

Wilce, A. 2012. Conjugates, correlation and quantum mechanics. arXiv:1206.2897.

Wootters, W. K. and Zurek, W. H. 1982. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature, 299(5886), 802–803.Google Scholar

Yao, A. C.-C. 1993. Quantum circuit complexity. Pages 352–361 of: Proceedings of Thirty-fourth IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS1993).

Yuen, H. P. 1986. Amplification of quantum states and noiseless photon amplifiers. Phys. Lett. A, 113, 405–407.Google Scholar

Yuen, H. P. 2012. An unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment protocol. arXiv preprint arXiv:arXiv:1212.0938v1.