Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
16 - Severity scoring, improved care?
from Section 2 - Quality management of the ICU
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide, pp. 124 - 133Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Moreno, RP, Jardim, AL, Godinho de Matos, R, Metnitz, PGH. Principles of risk-adjustment in the critically ill patient. In: Kuhlen, R, Moreno, R, Ranieri, M, Rhodes, A, eds. 25 Years of Progress and Innovation in Intensive Care Medicine. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2007: 409–17.Google Scholar
Halpern, NA, Pastores, SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 65–71.Google Scholar
Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America IoM. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Howard, RJ. Missed opportunities: The Institute of Medicine report – organ donation. opportunities for action. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1–3.Google Scholar
James, JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf 2013; 9: 122–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, A, Ferdinande, P, Flaatten, H, Guidet, B, Metnitz, PG, Moreno, RP. The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1647–1653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, A, Moreno, RP. Intensive care provision: a global problem. Braz J Intensive Care 2012; 24: 322–325.Google ScholarPubMed
Pearse, RM, Moreno, RP, Bauer, P, et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380: 1059–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, A, Cecconi, M. Can surgical outcomes be prevented by postoperative admission to critical care? Crit Care 2013; 17: 110.Google Scholar
Rhodes, A, Moreno, RP, Azoulay, E, et al. Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 598–605.Google Scholar
Rothen, HU, Stricker, K, Einfalt, J, et al. Variability in outcome and resource use in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 1329–1336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall Curtis, J, Cook, DJ, Wall, RJ, et al. Intensive care unit quality improvement: a “how-to” guide for the interdisciplinary team. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslow, MJ, Badawi, O. Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 1 – interpretation and accuracy of outcome prediction scoring systems. Chest 2012; 141: 245–252.Google Scholar
Breslow, MJ, Badawi, O. Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 2 – maximizing value from outcome prediction scoring systems. Chest 2012:141: 518–527.Google Scholar
Poole, D, Bertolini, G. Outcome-based benchmarking in the ICU part I: statistical tools for the creation and validation of severity scores. In: Chice, J-D, Moreno, R, Putensen, C, Rhodes, A, eds. Patient Safety and Quality of Care in Intensive Care Medicine. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftiche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2009: 141–150.Google Scholar
Poole, D, Bertolini, G. Outcome-based benchmarking in the ICU Part II: Use and limitations of severity scores in critical care. In: Chiche, J-D, Moreno, R, Putensen, C, Rhodes, A, eds. Patient Safety and Quality of Care in Intensive Care Medicine. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftiche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2009: 151–160.Google Scholar
Knaus, WA, Draper, EA, Wagner, DP, Zimmerman, JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 818–829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Gall, JR, Lemeshow, S, Saulnier, F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270: 2957–2963.Google Scholar
Moreno, RP. Outcome prediction in intensive care: why we need to reinvent the wheel. Curr Op Crit Care 2008; 14: 483–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, JE, Kramer, AA. Outcome prediction in critical care: the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation models. Curr Op Crit Care 2008; 14: 491–497.Google Scholar
Capuzzo, M, Moreno, RP, Le Gall, J-R. Outcome prediction in critical care: the Simplified Acute Physiology Score models. Curr Op Crit Care 2008; 14: 485–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, TL, Teres, D, Nathanson, B. Outcome prediction in critical care: the Mortality Probability Models. Curr Op Crit Care 2008; 14: 498–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, DA, Rowan, KM. Outcome prediction in critical care: the ICNARC model. Curr Op Crit Care 2008; 14: 506–512.Google Scholar
Moreno, RP, Afonso, S. Building and using outcome prediction models: should we be lumpers or splitters? In: Kuhlen, R, Moreno, R, Ranieri, M, Rhodes, A, eds. Controversies in Intensive Care Medicine. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftiche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2008: 415–419.Google Scholar
Poole, D, Rossi, C, Anghileri, A, et al. External validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 in a cohort of 28,357 patients from 147 Italian intensive care units. Intensive Care Medicine 2009; 35: 1916–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, K. The reliability of case mix measurements in intensive care. Curr Op Crit Care 1996; 2: 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, NA, Jenkinson, C, Hayes, JA, et al. Review of outcome measures used in adult critical care. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 2119–2124.Google Scholar
Bosman, RJ, Oudemane van Straaten, HM, Zandstra, DF. The use of intensive care information systems alters outcome prediction. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24: 953–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suistomaa, M, Kari, A, Ruokonen, E, Takala, J. Sampling rate causes bias in APACHE II and SAPS II scores. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 1773–1778.Google Scholar
Moreno, RP, Metnitz, PG, Almeida, E, et al. SAPS 3 Investigators: SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1345–1355.Google Scholar
Higgins, TL, Teres, D, Copes, WS, Nathanson, BH, Stark, M, Kramer, AA. Assessing contemporary intensive care unit outcome: an updated Mortality Probability Admission Model (MPM0-III). Critical Care Med 2007; 35: 827–835.Google Scholar
Levy, M. Including families in quality measurement in critical care. Critical Care Med 2007; 35: 324–325.Google Scholar
Wall, RJ, Engelberg, RA, Gries, CJ, Glavan, B, Randall Curtis, J. Spiritual care of families in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Med 2007; 35: 1084–1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprung, CL, Maia, P, Bulow, H-H, et al., The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33: 1732–1739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertolini, G, Boffelli, S, Malacarne, P, et al. End-of-life decision-making and quality of ICU performance: an observational study in 84 Italian units. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1495–1504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azoulay, E, Metnitz, B, Sprung, C-L, et al. End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 623–630.Google Scholar
Randall Curtis, J. End-of-life care for patients in the intensive care unit. In: Kuhlen, R, Moreno, R, Ranieri, M, Rhodes, A, eds. 25 Years of Progress and Innovation in Intensive Care Medicine. Berlin: Medizinisch Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2007: 469–479.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, JE, Kramer, AA, McNair, DS, Malila, FM, Shaffer, VL. Intensive care unit length of stay: benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV. Critical Care Med 2006; 34: 2517–2529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapoport, J, Teres, D, Lemeshow, S, Gehlbach, S. A method for assessing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive care units: a multicenter inception cohort study. Critical Care Med 1994; 22: 1385–1391.Google Scholar
Nathanson, BH, Higgins, TL, Teres, D, Copes, WS, Kramer, A, Stark, M. A revised method to assess intensive care unit clinical performance and resource utilization. Critical Care Med 2007; 35: 1853–1862.Google Scholar
Moreno, RP, Hochrieser, H, Metnitz, B, Bauer, P, Metnitz, PGH. Characterizing the risk profiles of intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36: 1207–1212.Google Scholar
Metnitz, PG, Moreno, RP, Almeida, E, et al., SAPS 3 Investigators: SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 1336–1344.Google Scholar