Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:46:47.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Religious Identity Politics and Genuine Support for Democracy

from Part III - For the People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

By
Gizem Arikan  and
Pazit Ben-Nun Bloom
Edited by
Ashley Weinberg
Ashley Weinberg
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access

Summary

Are group identities associated with pro- or anti-democratic orientations? We focus on the relationship between religious identity and genuine support for democracy, which refers to citizens’ endorsement of norms and procedures associated with democratic governance. We suggest that the effect of religious identity on genuine support for democracy is conditional on whether individuals belong to a minority religious tradition and the extent to which minority religions are treated differentially by the state. Using data from the World Values Surveys, we show that, while the strength of religious identity is associated with reduced genuine support for democracy, this negative effect is less pronounced for members of minority religious groups, especially when these groups face differential treatment by the state. We also find that members of minority religions are more committed to democratic norms than members of majority religions as their group identity becomes stronger and as their differential treatment by the state increases.

Keywords

Religious identityReligious minoritiesSupport for democracyReligious discriminationReligious regulationIntergroup relations
Type
Chapter
Information
Psychology of Democracy
Of the People, By the People, For the People
 , pp. 354 - 376
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, S. (2019). E pluribus unum? The fight over identity politics. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 160–163.Google Scholar
Allen, R. (2010). The bonding and bridging roles of religious institutions for refugees in a non-gateway context. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(6), 1049–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anwar, M. (2001). The participation of ethnic minorities in British politics. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(3), 533–549.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (2018). The lies that bind: Rethinking identity: Creed, country, class, culture. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Arikan, G. and Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2020). Democratic norms and religion. In Djupe, P., Rozell, M. J. and Jelen, T. G. (Eds.), The Oxford encyclopedia of politics and religion, pp. 241–261. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arikan, G. and Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2019a). ‘I was hungry and you gave me food’: Religiosity and attitudes toward redistribution. PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0214054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arikan, G. and Ben-Nun Bloom, P. (2019b). Religion and political protest: A cross-country analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 52(2), 246–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banfi, E., Gianni, M. and Giugni, M. (2016). Religious minorities and secularism: An alternative view of the impact of religion on the political values of Muslims in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(2), 292–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J. (2003). Religion adherence data. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/barro/publications/religion-adherence-data. (Accessed 28 October 2019).Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P. and Arikan, G. (2013a). Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national test of mediating mechanisms. British Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 375–397.Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P. and Arikan, G. (2013b). Priming religious belief and religious social behaviour affects support for democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 368–382.Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P. and Arikan, G. (2012). A two-edged sword: The differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy. Political Behavior, 34(2), 249–276.Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, P., Arikan, G. and Courtemanche, M. (2015). Religious social identity, religious belief, and anti-immigration sentiment. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
Bratton, M. and Mattes, R. (2000). Democratic and market reforms in Africa: What the ‘people’ say. Working Paper no.5. Afrobarometer. Accessed at: https://afrobarometer.org/publications/wp5-democratic-and-market-reforms-africa-what-people-say.Google Scholar
Del Sarto, R. A., Malmvigand, H. and Soler i Lecha, E. (2019). Interregnum: The regional order in the Middle East and North Africa after 2011. MENARA Final Reports, no. 1. Accessed at: www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/interregnum-regional-order-middle-east-and-north-africa-after-2011.Google Scholar
Dowley, K. M. and Silver, B. D. (2002). Social capital, ethnicity and support for democracy in the post-Communist states. Europe-Asia Studies, 54(4), 505–527.Google Scholar
Djupe, P. A. and Gilbert, C. P. (2009). The political influence of churches. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, P. A. and Calfano, B. R. (2013). Religious value priming, threat, and political tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 66(4), 768–780.Google Scholar
Eskelinen, V. and Verkuyten, M. (2018). Support for democracy and liberal sexual mores among Muslims in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1521715Google Scholar
Fearon, J. D. and Laitin, D. D. (2000). Violence and the social construction of ethnic identity. International Organization, 54(4), 845–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R. and Martin, R. R. (2014). Ensuring liberties: Understanding state restrictions on religious freedoms. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(4), 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R., Martin, R. R. and Fox, J. (2017). Explaining discrimination against religious minorities. Politics and Religion, 10, 389–416.Google Scholar
Fox, J. and Akbaba, Y. (2015). Restrictions on the religious practices of religious minorities: A global survey. Political Studies, 63(5), 1070–1086.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The demand for dignity and the politics of resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. L. (2010). The political consequences of religiosity: Does religion always cause political intolerance? In Wolfe, A. and Katznelson, I. (Eds.), Religion and democracy in America: Danger or opportunity?, pp.147–75. New York and Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Grundel, M. and Maliepaard, M. (2012). Knowing, understanding and practising democratic citizenship: An investigation of the role of religion among Muslim, Christian and Non-religious adolescents. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(12), 2075–2096.Google Scholar
Gundelach, P (2010). Democracy and denomination: Democratic values among Muslim minorities and the majority population in Denmark. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(3), 426–450.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. (2019). Religion, sectarianism and democracy: Theory and evidence from Lebanon. Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-019-09538-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy – And how can we measure it? PS Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamal, A. (2005). The political participation and engagement of Muslim Americans: Mosque involvement and group consciousness. American Politics Research, 33(4), 521–544.Google Scholar
Knoll, B. R. (2009). ‘And who is my neighbor?’ Religion and immigration policy attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 313–331.Google Scholar
Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maliepaard, M., Gijsberts, M. and Phalet, K. (2015). Islamic gatherings: Experiences of discrimination and religious affirmation across established and new immigrant communities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(15), 2635–2651.Google Scholar
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Cohen, A. B. and Miller, D. T. (2011). Religiosity and social welfare: Competing influences of cultural conservatism and prosocial value orientation. Journal of Personality, 79(4), 763–92.Google Scholar
Mustafa, A. and Richards, L. (2019). Immigration attitudes amongst European Muslims: Social identity, economic threat and familiar experiences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(7), 1050–1069.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2019). A closer look at how religious restrictions have risen around the world. 15 July.Google Scholar
Portes, A. and Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. and Campbell, D. E. (2010). American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Sandovici, M. E. and Listhaug, O. (2010). Ethnic and linguistic minorities and political participation in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 51(1-2), 111–136.Google Scholar
Saroglou, V., Delpierre, V. and Dernelle, R. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 721–734.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. and Sarsfield, R. (2007). Democrats with adjectives: Linking direct and indirect measures of democratic support. European Journal of Political Research, 46(5), 637–659.Google Scholar
Sides, J., Tesler, M. and Vavreck, L. (2019). Identity politics can lead to progress. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 163–166.Google Scholar
The World Factbook (2016). Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K. and Manow, P. (2009). Religion, class coalitions, and welfare states. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(3), 371–391.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, M. and Yildiz, A. A. (2009). Muslim immigrants and religious group feelings: Self-identification and attitudes among Sunni and Alevi Turkish-Dutch. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7), 1121–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, C. (2007). Are levels of democracy affected by mass attitudes? Testing attainment and sustainment effects on democracy. International Political Science Review, 28(4), 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welzel, C. and Alvarez, A. M. (2013). Enlightening people: The spark of emancipative values. In Dalton, R. J. and Welzel, C. (Eds.), The civic culture transformed: From allegiant to assertive citizens, pp. 59–89. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×