Book contents
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Critical Thinking about Psychotherapy
- 2 Intellectual and Adaptive Functioning
- 3 Autism Spectrum
- 4 Inattention and Hyperactivity
- 5 Learning
- 6 Tics
- 7 Psychosis
- 8 Bipolar Spectrum
- 9 Depression
- 10 Anxiety
- 11 Obsessions and Compulsions
- 12 Trauma and Attachment
- 13 Feeding
- 14 Eating
- 15 Toileting
- 16 Sleep
- 17 Disruptive Behavior and Conduct
- 18 Substance Use
- 19 Skepticism and Psychotherapy
- Index
- References
1 - Critical Thinking about Psychotherapy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Critical Thinking about Psychotherapy
- 2 Intellectual and Adaptive Functioning
- 3 Autism Spectrum
- 4 Inattention and Hyperactivity
- 5 Learning
- 6 Tics
- 7 Psychosis
- 8 Bipolar Spectrum
- 9 Depression
- 10 Anxiety
- 11 Obsessions and Compulsions
- 12 Trauma and Attachment
- 13 Feeding
- 14 Eating
- 15 Toileting
- 16 Sleep
- 17 Disruptive Behavior and Conduct
- 18 Substance Use
- 19 Skepticism and Psychotherapy
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent PsychotherapyA Skeptical Field Guide, pp. 1 - 13Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Works Cited in Sidebar
Gerbic, S. (2013). Wikapediatrician Susan Gerbic discusses her Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia project. Retrieved from www.csicop.orgGoogle Scholar
Gerbic, S. (2017). Facilitated communication on Wikipedia gets an update. Retrieved from www.csicop.orgGoogle Scholar
References
Bunge, M. (1998). Philosophy of science: From problem to theory, Vol. 1 (rev. ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P. … & Woody, S. R. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Dimidjian, S., & Hollon, S. (2010). How would we know if psychotherapy were harmful? American Psychologist, 65, 21–33.Google Scholar
Feinstein, D. (2008). Energy psychology: A review of the preliminary evidence. Psychotherapy: Research, Practice, Training, 45, 199–213.Google Scholar
Grimes, D. R., & Bishop, D. V. (2018). Distinguishing polemic from commentary in science: Some guidelines illustrated with the case of Sage and Burgio (2017). Child Development, 89(1), 141–147.Google Scholar
Hupp, S. (2018). Child & adolescent psychotherapy: Components of evidence- based treatment for youth and their parents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupp, S., Stary, A., & Jewell, J. (2017). Science vs. silliness for parents: Debunking the myths of child psychology. Skeptical Inquirer, 41(1), 44–47.Google Scholar
Koocher, G. P., McMann, M. R., Stout, A. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2015). Discredited assessment and treatment methods used with children and adolescents: A Delphi poll. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(5), 722–729.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2005). Scientifically unsupported and supported interventions for childhood psychopathology: A summary. Pediatrics, 115(3), 761–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Distinguishing scientific from pseudoscientific psychotherapies: Evaluating the role of theoretical plausibility, with a little help from Reverend Bayes. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 18(2), 105–112.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & David, M. (2012). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 7–36.Google Scholar
Linden, M. (2013). How to define, find, and classify side effects in psychotherapy: From unwanted events to adverse treatment reactions. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20, 286–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNally, R. J. (2003). The demise of pseudoscience. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 2, 97–101.Google Scholar
Mercer, J. (2017). Evidence of potentially harmful treatments for children and adolescents. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 34, 107–125.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. (2005). Three in four Americans believe in paranormal. Retrieved from http://news.gallup.comGoogle Scholar
Olatunji, B. O., Parker, L. M., & Lohr, J. M. (2005). Pseudoscience in contemporary psychology: Professional issues and implications. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 4(2), 19–36.Google Scholar
Pignotti, M. & Thyer, B. A. (2009). Some comments on “Energy psychology: A review of the evidence”: Premature conclusions based on incomplete evidence? Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Training, Practice, 46, 257–261.Google Scholar
Rosen, G. M., & Davison, G. C. (2003). Psychology should list empirically supported principles of change (ESPs) and not credentialed trademarked therapies or other treatment packages. Behavior Modification, 27, 300–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Southam-Gerow, M. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2014). Evidence base updates: The evolution of the evaluation of psychological treatments for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/15374416.2013.855128Google Scholar
Thyer, B. A., & Pignotti, M. (2011). Evidence-based practices do not exist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 39(4), 328–333.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by