Protective measurement, postselection and the Heisenberg representation

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107706927.004

3 - Protective measurement, postselection and the Heisenberg representation

from Part I - Fundamentals and applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2015

Yakir Aharonov and

Eliahu Cohen

Edited by

Shan Gao

Show author details

Yakir Aharonov: Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University and Chapman University
Eliahu Cohen: Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Shan Gao: Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Classical ergodicity retains its meaning in the quantum realm when the employed measurement is protective. This unique measuring technique is re-examined in the case of post-selection, giving rise to novel insights studied in the Heisenberg rep-resentation. Quantum statistical mechanics is then briefly described in terms of two-state density operators.

Introduction

In classical statistical mechanics, the ergodic hypothesis allows us to measure position probabilities in two equivalent ways: we can either measure the appropriate particle density in the region of interest or track a single particle over a long time and calculate the proportion of time it spent there. As will be shown below, certain quantum systems also obey the ergodic hypothesis when protectively measured. Yet, since Schrödinger's wave function seems static in this case [1, 2, 3], and Bohmian trajectories were proven inappropriate for calculating time averages of the particle's position [4, 5], we will perform our analysis in the Heisenberg representation.

Indeed, quantum theory has developed along two parallel routes, namely the Schrödinger and Heisenberg representations, later shown to be equivalent. The Schrödinger representation, due to its mathematical simplicity, has become more common. Yet, the Heisenberg representation offers some important insights which emerge in a more natural way, especially when employing modular variables [6]. For example, in the context of the two-slit experiment it sheds a new light on the question of momentum exchange [7, 8, 9]. Recently studied within the Heisenberg representation are also the double Mach–Zehnder interferometer [10] and the N-slit problem [11]. As can be concluded from [11], the Heisenberg representation prevails in emphasizing the non-locality in quantum mechanics, thus providing us with insights about this aspect of quantum mechanics as well.

Equipped with the backward evolving state-vector within the framework of two-state-vector formalism (TSVF) [12], the Heisenberg representation becomes even more powerful since the time evolution of the operators includes now information from the two boundary conditions.

Type: Chapter
Information: Protective Measurement and Quantum Reality
Towards a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
, pp. 28 - 38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706927.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman, The Schrödinger wave is observable after all! In Quantum Control and Measurement, H., Ezawa and Y., Murayama (eds.), Tokyo: Elsevier Publications (1993).Google Scholar

[2] Y., Aharonov, J., Anandan and L., Vaidman, Meaning of the wave function, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4616 (1993).Google Scholar

[3] Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman, Measurement of the Schrödinger wave of a single particle, Phys. Lett. A 178, 38 (1993).Google Scholar

[4] Y., Aharonov, M. O., Scully and B. G., Englert, Protective measurements and Bohm trajectories, Phys. Lett. A 263, 137 (1999).Google Scholar

[5] Y., Aharonov, N., Erez and M. O., Scully, Time and ensemble averages in Bohmian mechanics, Physica Scripta 69, 81–83 (2004).Google Scholar

[6] Y., Aharonov, H., Pendleton and A., Petersen, Modular variables in quantum theory, Int. J. Th. Phys. 2, 213 (1969).Google Scholar

[7] M. O., Scully, B. G., Englert and H., Walther, Quantum optical tests of complementarity, Nature 351, 111–116 (1991).Google Scholar

[8] S., Durr, T., Nonn and G., Rempe, Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer, Nature 395, 33–37 (1998).Google Scholar

[9] T. J., Herzog, P. G., Kwiat, H., Weinfurter and A., Zeilinger, Complementarity and the quantum eraser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3034–3037 (1995).Google Scholar

[10] J., Tollaksen, Y., Aharonov, A., Casher, T., Kaufherr and S., Nussinov, Quantum interference experiments, modular variables and weak measurements, New J. Phys. 12, 013023 (2010).Google Scholar

[11] Y., Aharonov, On the Aharonov–Bohm effect and why Heisenberg captures nonlocal-ity better than Schrodinger. In Memory of Akira Tonomura: Physicist and Electron Microscopist, Y.A., Ono and K., Fujikawa (eds.), Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company (2013).

[12] Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman, The two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics, in Time in Quantum Mechanics,J. G., Muga et al. (eds.), Berlin: Springer, 369–112 (2002).

[13] L., Vaidman, Past of a quantum particle, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013).Google Scholar

[14] A., Danan, D., Farfurnik, S., Bar-Ad and L., Vaidman, Asking photons where have they been, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013).Google Scholar

[15] K. G., Kay, Toward a comprehensive semiclassical ergodic theory, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 3026 (1983).Google Scholar

[16] Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman, Protective measurements of two-state vectors. In Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-Distance, R. S., Cohen, M., Horne and J., Stachel (eds.), BSPS 1-8 (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997).

[17] Y., Aharonov, J., Anandan and L., Vaidman, The meaning of protective measurements, Found. Phys. 26, 117–126 (1996).Google Scholar

[18] S., Gao, Meaning of the wave function, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 111, 4124–14138 (2011).Google Scholar

[19] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen and A. C., Elitzur, Foundations andapplications of weakquantum measurement, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052105 (2014).Google Scholar

[20] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen, D., Grossman and A. C., Elitzur, Can weak measurement lend empirical support to quantum retrocausality, EPJ Web of Conferences 58, 01015 (2013).Google Scholar

[21] F., Schwabl, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edition, Berlin: Springer, 54–56 (2002).

[22] Y., Aharonov, D., Albert and L., Vaidman, How the result of a measurement of a component of a spin 1/2 particle can turn out to be 100, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351–1354 (1988).Google Scholar

[23] Y., Aharonov, E., Cohen and S., Ben-Moshe, Unusual interactions of pre- and post-selected particles, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on New Frontiens in Physics, EPJ Web of Conferences 70, 00053 (2014).Google Scholar

[24] Y., Aharonov, E. C., Lerner, H. W., Huang and J. M., Knight, Oscillator phase states, thermal equilibrium and group representations, J. Math. Physics 14, 746–756 (1973).Google Scholar

[25] B., Reznik and Y., Aharonov, Time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 52, 2538–2550 (1995).Google Scholar

Book contents

3 - Protective measurement, postselection and the Heisenberg representation

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive