Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T16:35:49.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Towards clearer legal definitions

from Part III - The protection of traditional knowledge in the international patent system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Jonathan Curci
Affiliation:
Touro International University, Rome
Get access

Summary

An intellectual property approach to the concept of traditional knowledge

TK, by gaining importance, has become the new buzzword for IP law. In an attempt to define TK with the view of eventual protection in mind, the WIPO IGC on IPGRTKF of the WIPO uses the term to refer to “tradition-based literary, artistic or scientific works; performances; inventions; scientific discoveries; designs; marks, names and symbols; undisclosed information; and, all other tradition-based innovations and creations resulting from intellectual activity in the industrial, scientific, literary or artistic fields.”

The notion “tradition-based” refers to knowledge systems, creations, innovations, and cultural expressions “which have generally been transmitted from generation to generation; are generally regarded as pertaining to a particular people or its territory; have generally been developed in a non-systematic way; and, are constantly evolving in response to a changing environment.” TK in everyday life is governed by a series of holistic and dynamic local and indigenous customary laws and where there is no distinction between the sacred and secular. This holistic outlook on life accounts for the way these communities operate with a sacred notion of the inherent “one-ness” between man and the natural order, where all living things are interrelated and interdependent. There follows from this view a pervasive respect for the environment and an acute sensitivity to its agricultural and medicinal qualities. Such communities have evolved complex relationships with their surroundings, often expressed through totemic relationships with various species and religious ceremonies involving the celebration of the human–nature interaction.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Taubman, T., ‘Genetic Resources’, in Lewinski, S., Indigenous Heritage and Intellectual Property (Kluwer, The Hague, 2nd edn, 2008) 192–216Google Scholar
,World Intellectual Property Organization, Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders: WIPO Fact Finding Mission on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (WIPO, Geneva, 2001) 50Google Scholar
Abbott, F., Cottier, T. and Gurry, F. (eds.), The Intellectual Property System: Commentary and Materials (Kluwer, The Hague, 1999) 506
Bragdon, S. and Bragdon, H., “Major Legal Regimes Affecting Plant Genetic Resources (PGR): The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the International Undertaking (IU) and the TRIPS Agreement”, in Cottier, T. and Mavroidis, P. (eds.), Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition and Sustainable Development (University of Michigan Press, 2003) vol. 3, 448–49Google Scholar
Klemm, S., “Origins and Allocation of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional PGRFA: Basic Questions”, in Cottier, T. and Biber-Klemm, S. (eds.), Rights to Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge (CABI, 2006) 165–72Google Scholar
Sorensen, J. and Johannessen, C., “Biological Evidence for Pre-Columbian Transoceanic Voyages”, in Mair, V. (ed.), Contacts and Exchange in the Ancient World (University of Hawaii Press, 2006) 238–98Google Scholar
Torremans, L. C., “The Law Applicable to Copyright: Which Rights Are Created and Who Owns Them?” (2001) 188 Revue international du droit d'auteur37, 71Google Scholar
Merrill, T. W. and Smith, H. E., “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?” (2001) 111 Yale Law Journal357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, B., “Regulating Access: Intellectual Property Law and Biodiscovery” (2003) 13 European Intellectual Property Review301Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Towards clearer legal definitions
  • Jonathan Curci
  • Book: The Protection of Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge in International Law of Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770685.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Towards clearer legal definitions
  • Jonathan Curci
  • Book: The Protection of Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge in International Law of Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770685.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Towards clearer legal definitions
  • Jonathan Curci
  • Book: The Protection of Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge in International Law of Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770685.005
Available formats
×