Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T23:42:49.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Attrition or expansion? Changes in the lexicon of Finnish and American adult bilinguals in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

It is within the lexicon that bilinguals report the most dramatic changes in their first language (LI) after acquiring a second language (L2). On the one hand, they report word-finding problems. On the other hand, they are appalled by the L2-origin words that creep into their speech in LI in various forms. This paper will discuss the second of these phenomena, and contrast the patterns of incorporations of Swedish-origin lexemes into the English and the Finnish of adult bilinguals living in Göteborg.

In several recent studies, researchers claim that there are general, structural constraints on certain types of incorporation, notably code-switching. In a relatively early study of incorporation, Hasselmo (1974: ch.5) proposes the ‘hypothesis’ that incorporation of English lexemes in American Swedish follows an ‘ordered choice’ hierarchy (see below). He makes no strong claims of generality, however. DiSciullo, Muysken, and Singh (1986) claim that structural constraints on code-mixing (what I and others prefer to call code-switching) follow the general principle of government. Poplack (1980 and later papers) claims that code-switching, narrowly defined, follows a general ‘equivalence constraint’ (see below). While the debate on ways of characterizing candidates for structural constraints on code-switching, borrowing or both goes on, the role of the social context of language contact seems to have been neglected. The purpose of this chapter is to examine some of these claims of universality or predictability of patterns of incorporation in relation to data of incorporation of Swedish lexemes in the Finnish and English of Finnish and American first generation immigrants in Sweden. I suggest, in this connection, that it may be premature to propose universal structural constraints on code-switching.

Type
Chapter
Information
Progression and Regression in Language
Sociocultural, Neuropsychological and Linguistic Perspectives
, pp. 384 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×