Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:55:36.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Procedural Autonomy in the Netherlands: A Fading Relic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Get access

Summary

A FIRM STARTING POINT IN EU LAW

The relationship between EU law and national civil procedure law is developing quite rapidly. That might be considered as surprising because the starting point is clear and simple: EU law is law of the EU and the rules and regulations concerning civil procedure are up to the Member States. Member States have the authority over their own procedural system. This outset from the start also means that proceedings concerning EU law before national courts are conducted along the lines set out by the national civil procedure system. There is no EU law that provides a general system for all types of civil cases that must be applied by Member States. EU Member States are free to set up their own system concerning civil procedural law.

That has been settled case law for many years. In the classic case Rewe from 1976, the ECJ placed emphasis on the concept of procedural autonomy. In many cases since then the ECJ has referred to this starting point. In the EOS/Danko case from September 2018 the question at the table was whether Directive 93/13 on unfair terms precludes certain national legislation which prevents a consumer protection organisation from intervening in proceedings seeking an order for payment. On its way to the answer the ECJ ruled that in the absence of EU legislation concerning the possibility for consumer protection associations to intervene in individual disputes involving consumers, it is for the national legal order of each Member State to establish such rules, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy. By doing so, the ECJ once again reconfirmed the principle of procedural autonomy. There are many more cases in which the ECJ has referred to this starting point.

By the term ‘procedural autonomy’, only the freedom of the Member States to organise their procedural law for civil proceedings is referred to. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that procedural autonomy is not the only type of autonomy that plays a role in the ECJ case law. For example, in several combined cases on possible state aid and tax measures adopted by a regional or local authority the ECJ also refers to the concept of institutional autonomy, economic autonomy and regional autonomy. This chapter deals with procedural autonomy of the Netherlands.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×