A Bibliography of Writings about the ALI/UNIDROIT Project

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511511301.011

Taruffo, Michele, “Drafting Rules for Transnational Litigation.” Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess International 449 (1997)Google Scholar

Barcelo, John III, “Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure: Introduction.” Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 30, no. 2 (1997), 493Google Scholar

Edición Especial (Special Issue): Proyecto de Normas Transnacionales del Proceso Civil (Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure): 52 Derecho PUC (1998 & 1999). Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Civil Litigation Without Frontiers: Harmonization and Unification of Procedural Law,” 575; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Litigio Civil Sin Fronteras: Armonización y Unificación del Derecho Procesal,” 583; Gidi, Antonio, “Apresentação ao Projeto de Normas Transnacionais de Processo Civil,” 593; Gidi, Antonio, “Presentación del Proyecto de Normas Transnacionales del Proceso Civil,” 607; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., and Taruffo, Michele, “Discussion Draft No. 01, Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure,” 621; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., and Taruffo, Michele, “Proyecto de Normas Transnacionales del Proceso Civil,” 679; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., and Taruffo, Michele, “Normas Transnacionais de Processo Civil,” 1047Google Scholar

Symposium: Texas International Law Journal, vol. 33 (1998). Born, Gary, “Critical Observations on the Draft Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure,” 387; Weintraub, Russell J., “Critique of the Hazard-Taruffo Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure,” 413; Dolings, Jacob and Tiburcio, Carmen, “The Forum Law Rule in International Litigation – Which Procedural Law Governs Proceedings to Be Performed in Foreign Jurisdictions: Lex Fori or Lex Diligentiae?” 425; Walters, Gerhard and Baumgartner, Samuel P., “Utility and Feasibility of Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure: Some German and Swiss Reactions to the Hazard-Taruffo Project,” 463; Kessedjian, Catherine, “First Impressions of the Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure,” 477; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure: Preliminary Draft No. 1,” 499Google Scholar

Delaygua, Joaquim-J. Forner, “El Proyecto del American Law Institute ‘Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure’: La Cooperación Judicial.” Annuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado (2000), 275Google Scholar

Stürner, Rolf, “Règles Transnationales de Procédure Civile? Quelques Remarques d'un Européen sur un Nouveau Projet Commun de l'American Law Institute et d'UNIDROIT.” Revue Internationale de Droit Comparè 845 (2000)Google Scholar

Stürner, Rolf, “Some European Remarks on a New Joint Project of The American Law Institute and UNIDROIT (Foreign Law Year in Review: 1999).” International Lawyer, vol. 34, no. 3 (2000), 1071Google Scholar

Gidi, Antonio, “Normas Transnacionais de Processo Civil.” 8 Revista dos Mestrandos em Direito Econômico da UFBA 54 (2000)Google Scholar

Freitas, José Lebre, “O Anteprojecto Hazard-Taruffo para o Processo dos Litígios Comerciais Internacionais.” 2 Themis. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Nova de Lisboa 19 (2000)Google Scholar

Kunštek, Eduard, “Transnacionalna Pravila Gradanskog Postupka.” 21 Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta Sveučilišta U Rijeci 351 (2000)Google Scholar

Gidi, Antonio, “Apresentação às Normas Transnacionais de Processo Civil.” 8 Revista dos Mestrandos em Direito Econômico da UFBA 40 (2000) [Brazil], also published in 52 Derecho PUC 593 (1999) [Peru], in Roma e America 335 (2000) [Italy], and in 102 RePro 185 (2001) [Brazil]

Gidi, Antonio, “Iniciativas para la formulación de normas uniformes en el ámbito del derecho procesal civil internacional.” 54 Derecho PUC 245 (2001) [Peru], also published in 11 Tribunales de Justicia 21 (2002) [Spain], and in 26 Revista de Direito Processual Civil 749. (2002) [Brazil]; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Stürner, Rolf, Taruffo, Michele, and Gidi, Antonio, “Principios fundamentales del proceso civil transnacional,” 54 Derecho PUC 253 (2001), also published in 11 Tribunales de Justicia 27 (2002) [Spain], and in 26 Revista de Direito Processual Civil 754. (2002) [Brazil]; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Taruffo, Michele, Stürner, Rolf, and Gidi, Antonio, “Normas del proceso civil transnacional” 54 Derecho PUC 263 (2001), also published in 11 Tribunales de Justicia 31 (2002) [Spain], and in 26 Revista de Direito Processual Civil 761 (2002) [Brazil]

Vers un Procès Civil Universel? Les Règles Transnationales de Procédure Civile de l'American Law Institute, edited by Philippe Fouchard, (Paris: Editions Panthéon-Assas, 2001). Liebman, Lance, “Allocution,” 11; Fouchard, Philippe, “Introduction,” 13; Taruffo, Michele, “La Genèse et la finalité des Règles Proposées par l'American Law Institute,” 19; Mayer, Pierre, “L'Utilité des Règles Transnationales de Procédure Civile: Une vue Critique,” 23; Watt, Horatia Muir, “Quelle Méthode?” 39; Niboyet, Marie-Laure, “Quels Litiges?” 51; Gaudemet-Tallon, Hélène, “Quel Juge?” 67; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Le Déroulement du Procès,” 81; Normand, Jacques, “La Confrontation des Principes Directeurs,” 89; Kessedjian, Catherine, “Quelques Réflexions en Matière de Preuves,” 109; Cadiet, Loïc, “Quelles Preuves? Discovery, Témoins, Experts, Rôle Respectif des Parties et du Juge,” 115; Gidi, Antonio, “‘Vers un Procès Civil Transnational’: Une Première Réponse aux Critiques,” 139; Fouchard, Philippe, “Clôture,” 151; Mecarelli, Gabriele, “Les Principes Fondamentaux de Procédure Civile Transnationale et les ‘nouvelles’ Règles Transnationales: Premières Observations, 157; “Annexes,” 171

Special Issue, Harmonising Transnational Civil Procedure: The ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules [Vers Une Procédure Civile Transnationale Harmonisée: Les Principes et Règles ALI/UNIDROIT], Uniform Law Review [Revue de Droit Uniforme], NS – vol. 6, no. 4 (2001). Kronke, Herbert, “Efficiency, Fairness, Macro-Economic Functions: Challenges for the Harmonisation of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 740; Kronke, Herbert, “Efficacité, impartialité, fonctions macro-économiques: les objectifs de l'harmonisation de la procédure civile transnationale,” 741; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Fundamentals of Civil Procedure,” 753; Storme, Marcel, “Procedural Law and the Reform of Justice: from Regional to Universal Harmonisation,” 763; Fouchard, Philippe, “Une procédure civile transnationale: Quelle fin et quels moyens?,” 779; Goldstein, Stephen, “The Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: The Utility of Such a Harmonization Project,” 789; Walker, Janet, “The Utility of the ALI/UNIDROIT Project on Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 803; Gidi, Antonio, “Notes on Criticizing the Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 819; Schack, Haimo, “Transnational Service of Process: A Call for Uniform and Mandatory Rules,” 827; Priestley, L. J., “Transnational Civil Procedure – Fact Pleading v. Notice Pleading: Its Significance in the Development of Evidence,” 841; Cooper, Edward H., “Transnational Civil Procedure: Fact Pleading or Notice Pleading? A Viewpoint from the USA,” 857; Stürner, Rolf, “Transnational Civil Procedure: Discovery and Sanctions Against Non-compliance,” 871; Lalive, Pierre, “Principe d'inquisition et principe accusatoire dans l'arbitrage commercial international,” 887; Mecarelli, Gabriele, “Quelques réflexions en matière de discovery,” 901; Carlucci, Aída Kemelmajer, “La charge de la preuve dans les Principes et Règles ALI/UNIDROIT relatifs à la procédure civile transnationale,” 915; Béraudo, Jean-Paul, “Réflexions sur les Principes ALI/UNIDROIT à propos de la preuve,” 925; Andrews, Neil, “Provisional and Protective Measures: Towards a Uniform Protective Order in Civil Matters,” 931; Beaumont, Bryan, “The Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure and their Relationship to Australian Jurisdictions,” 951; Elsen, Sheldon H., “An American Lawyer Looks at Litigation under the Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 971; Mikelénas, Valentinas, “The Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure and the New Code of Civil Procedure in Lithuania,” 981; “Frédérique Ferrand, Les ‘Principes’ relatifs à la procédure civile transnationale sont-ils autosuffisants? – De la nécessité ou non de les assortir de ‘Règles’ dans le projet ALI/UNIDROIT,” 995; Pfeiffer, Thomas, “The ALI/UNIDROIT Project: Are Principles Sufficient, Without the Rules?” 1015; ANNEX I: “ALI/UNIDROIT Draft Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 1035; ANNEXE II: “Projet ALI/UNIDROIT de Principes et Règles relatifs à la procédure civile transnationale,” 1105Google Scholar

New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 33 (2001). Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Taruffo, Michele, Stürner, Rolf, and Gidi, Antonio, “Introduction to the Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 769; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Stürner, Rolf, Taruffo, Michele, and Gidi, Antonio, “Fundamental Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 785; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Taruffo, Michele, Stürner, Rolf, and Gidi, Antonio, “Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure,” 793Google Scholar

Essays on Transnational and Comparative Civil Procedure, edited by Carpi, Federico and Lupoi, Michele (Torino: Giappichelli, 2001)

Walter, Gerhard and Baumgartner, Samuel P., Improving the Prospects of the Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure Project: Some Thoughts on Purpose and Means of Implementation, 6 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozeß International (2000), also published in 18 ritsumeikan l. rev. 169 (2001)

El Proyecto de las “Normas de Proceso Civil Transnacional,” 11 Tribunales de Justicia 19 (2002) [Spain]. Winter, Lorena Bachmaier, “El Proyecto de las ‘Normas de Proceso Civil Transnacional,’” 19; Gidi, Antonio, “Iniciativas para la formulación de normas uniformes en el ámbito del derecho procesal civil internacional,” 21; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Litigio civil sin fronteras: armonización y unificación del derecho procesal,” 24; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Stürner, Rolf, Taruffo, Michele, and Gidi, Antonio, “Principios fundamentales del proceso civil transnacional,” 27; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., Taruffo, Michele, Stürner, Rolf, and Gidi, Antonio, “Normas del proceso civil transnacional,” 31Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Samuel P., Gaining a Worldly Perspective for the World in Our Courts, unpublished manuscript (on file with ALI)

Cordero, Jorge Sánchez and Gidi, Antonio, Las reglas y procedimientos del derecho procesal civil transnacional. El Proyecto American Law Institute-UNIDROIT (2003)

Ferrand, Frédérique, La Procédure Civile Mondiale Modélisée: Le projet de l'American Law Institute et d'UNIDROIT de Principes et Règles de procédure civile transnationale: Actes du colloque de Lyon du 12 juin 2003, Collection Droit et Procédures (2004). Lavorel, Guy, “Allocution d'ouverture,” 9; Moréteau, Olivier, “Allocution,” 11; Kronke, Herbert, “Le cadre du projet ALI-UNIDROIT,” 17; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Les objectifs du projet ALI-UNIDROIT,” 23; Ferrand, Frédérique, “Rapports entre Principes et Règles dans le projet ALI-UNIDROIT,” 27; Junillon, Jacques, “Le projet ALI-UNIDROIT, vue critique d'un praticien du droit,” 35; Moussa, Tony, “Le Projet ALI-UNIDROIT, vue critique d'un magistrat,” 47; Gaudemet-Tallon, Hélène, “Les aspects de droit international privé du Projet ALI-UNIDROIT,” 71; Croze, Hervé, “L'introduction de l'instance,” 93; Normand, Jacques, “Le rôle respectif des parties et du juge dans les Principes de procédure civile transnationale,” 103; Cadiet, Loïc, “La preuve,” 119; Mecarelli, Gabriele, “Sanctions, frais et dépens. Les aspects financiers de la procédure,” 139; Guinchard, Serge, “Rapport de synthèse,” 155; Hazard, Geoffrey C. Jr., “Postface,” 345Google Scholar

The Future of Transnational Civil Litigation: English Responses to the ALI/UNIDROIT Draft Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure (London: The British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Andenas, Mads, Andrews, Neil, and Nazzini, Renato eds., 2004). Hazard, Geoffrey Jr., “The ALI/UNIDROIT Project,” 3; Stürner, Rolf, “Anglo-American and Continental Civil Procedure: The English Reform as a Model for Further Harmonization?” 9; Glasser, Cyril, “Do We Need a Transnational Civil Procedure Code? A Critical Comment,” 13; Lever, Jeremy, “Comparative Reflections,” 17; Andrews, Neil, “Embracing the Noble Quest for Transnational Procedural Principles,” 21; May, Anthony, “The ALI/UNIDROIT Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure in the Perspective of the New English and Welsh Rules,” 43; Brooke, Henry, “The ‘Overriding Objective,’ Procedural Sanctions, and Appeals,” 51; Rix, Bernard, “First Instance and Appellate Proceedings in Commercial Matters,” 65; Turner, Robert, “The Proactive Judge and the Provision of a Single Transnational Case Management System and Its Associate Procedures,” 73; Nazzini, Renato, “Transnational Litigation and ADR: The Philosophy of the CPR,” 91; Johnson, Adam, “Interim Measures under the Draft Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: Some Reflections from the English Perspective,” 109; Zuckerman, Adrian, “Compliance with Process Obligations and Fair Trial,” 127; Hollander, Charles, “Documentary Disclosure: Lessons from the English Experience,” 151; Taruffo, Michele, “Admissions and Presentation of Evidence,” 161Google Scholar

Preliminary Draft No. 1 (1998)

Preliminary Draft No. 1A (1998)

Interim Revision (1998)

Discussion Draft No. 1 (1999)

Preliminary Draft No. 2 (2000)

Discussion Draft No. 2 (2001)

Council Draft No. 1 (2001)

Discussion Draft No. 3 (2002)

Preliminary Draft No. 3 (2002)

Discussion Draft No. 4 (2003)

Council Draft No. 2 (2003)

Proposed Final Draft (2004)

1999 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 1 (Feasibility Study)

2000 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 2 (Preliminary Draft)

2001 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 3 (Secretary's Report)

2001 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 4 (Draft)

2001 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 5 (Remarks and Comments)

2002 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 6 (Secretary's Report)

2002 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 7 (Draft)

2002 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 8 (Secretary's Report)

2002 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 9 (Draft)

2003 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 10 (Draft)

2004 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 11 (Draft)

2004 – Study ⅬXXVI – Doc. 12 (Draft)