Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:26:14.836Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Structural and functional neuroimaging throughout the lifespan

from Section I - Theory and models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Jacobus Donders
Affiliation:
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital
Scott J. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Introduction

From a neuroimaging perspective, the changes that occur over the lifespan in brain structure and functional capacity, both developmental and degenerative, must be considered in combination with the cognitive, behavioral, and psychosocial status of an individual when utilizing neuroimaging for either clinical or research purposes. In this chapter we selectively review some common conventional neuroimaging techniques and their application, followed by discussion of advanced structural and functional neuroimaging methods and likely future directions.

Conventional neuroimaging methodologies

Historically speaking, older structural and functional neuroimaging techniques are often referred to as “conventional” imaging methodologies, though the categorization of what techniques are considered cutting-edge versus those which are labeled conventional continues to evolve over time as ever-newer imaging technologies are developed. Structural imaging techniques such as computed axial tomography (CAT or CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have become routine neuroimaging methodologies, with wide availability in terms of both scanning technology and technical capacity for their implementation and interpretation. CT scanning was the earliest method of structural brain imaging to come into common clinical and research use, and utilizes computerized integration of multiple X-ray images to generate cross-sectional views of the brain. While CT remains the optimal method for some neuroimaging purposes (e.g. visualization of bone or acute hemorrhage), the exposure to radiation involved in the technique and its relatively low contrast between classes of brain tissue have led CT largely to be supplanted by structural MRI in research and for many clinical applications.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anbeek, P, Vincken, KL, Osch, MJP, et al. Automatic segmentation of different-sized white matter lesions by voxel probability estimation. Med Image Anal 2004;8:205–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, EA, Takahashi, C, Berg, MJ, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of manual and semiautomated quantification of MS lesions by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:300–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sastre-Garriga, J, Ingle, GT, Chard, DT, et al. Grey and white matter atrophy in early clinical stages of primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2004;22:353–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyer, GP, Velthuizen, RP, Murtagh, FR, et al. Technical aspects and evaluation methodology for the application of two automated brain MRI tumor segmentation methods in radiation therapy planning. Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1167–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, K, Yang, J, Zhang, ZG, et al. Semi-automated brain tumor and edema segmentation using MRI. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, AT, Schuff, N, Amend, D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;71:441–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, CR Jr, Shiung, MM, Weigand, SD, et al. Brain atrophy rates predict subsequent clinical conversion in normal elderly and amnestic MCI. Neurology 2005;65:1227–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copenhaver, BR, Rabin, , Saykin, AJ, et al. The fornix and mammillary bodies in older adults with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive complaints: a volumetric MRI study. Psychiatry Res 2006;147:93–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, PJ, Saykin, AJ, Flashman, , et al. Regionally specific atrophy of the corpus callosum in AD, MCI and cognitive complaints. Neurobiol Aging 2006;27:1613–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baiano, M, David, A, Versace, A, et al. Anterior cingulate volumes in schizophrenia: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of MRI studies. Schizophr Res 2007;93:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigler, ED, Mortensen, S, Neeley, ES, et al. Superior temporal gyrus, language function, and autism. Dev Neuropsychol 2007;31:217–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleavinger, HB, Bigler, ED, Johnson, JL, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance image analysis of the cerebellum in macrocephalic and normocephalic children and adults with autism. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2008;14:401–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestor, PG, Kubicki, M, Kuroki, N, et al. Episodic memory and neuroimaging of hippocampus and fornix in chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 2007;155:21–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenton, ME, Dickey, CC, Frumin, M, et al. A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2001;49:1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberg, HS, Lozano, AM, Voon, V, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron 2005;45:651–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldapple, K, Segal, Z, Garson, C, et al. Modulation of cortical-limbic pathways in major depression: treatment-specific effects of cognitive behavior therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:34–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, SH, Evans, KR, Kruger, S, et al. Changes in regional brain glucose metabolism measured with positron emission tomography after paroxetine treatment of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:899–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, SH, Konarski, JZ, Segal, ZV, et al. Differences in brain glucose metabolism between responders to CBT and venlafaxine in a 16-week randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:778–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masdeu, JC, Arbizu, J. Brain single photon emission computed tomography: technological aspects and clinical applications. Semin Neurol 2008;28:423–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashburner, J, Friston, KJ. Voxel-based morphometry – the methods. Neuroimage 2000;11:805–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashburner, J, Friston, KJ. Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. Neuroimage 2001;14:1238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good, CD, Johnsrude, IS, Ashburner, J, et al. A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 2001;14:21–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, SS, Roberts, N. Voxel-based morphometry of temporal lobe epilepsy: an introduction and review of the literature. Epilepsia 2008;49:741–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saykin, AJ, Wishart, HA, Rabin, , et al. Older adults with cognitive complaints show brain atrophy similar to that of amnestic MCI. Neurology 2006;67:834–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, ME, Haut, MW, Reminger, SL, et al. Reduced frontal white matter volume in long-term childhood leukemia survivors: a voxel-based morphometry study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:792–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bihan, D, Mangin, JF, Poupon, C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:534–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basser, PJ, Mattiello, J, Bihan, D. MRdiffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66:259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierpaoli, C, Jezzard, P, Basser, PJ, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 1996;201:637–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zivadinov, R, Cox, JL. Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis. Int Rev Neurobiol 2007;79:449–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neema, M, Stankiewicz, J, Arora, A, et al. T1- and T2-based MRI measures of diffuse gray matter and white matter damage in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2007;17: 16S–21S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, SE, Janke, AL, Chalk, JB. Gray and white matter changes in Alzheimer's disease: A diffusion tensor imaging study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:20–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olbrich, HM, Valerius, G, Rusch, N, et al. Frontolimbic glutamate alterations in first episode schizophrenia: evidence from a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. World J Biol Psychiatry 2008;9:59–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simister, RJ, McLean, MA, Barker, GJ, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of malformations of cortical development causing epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 2007;74:107–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, KJ, Astrakas, LG, Zurakowski, D, et al. Predicting survival of children with CNS tumors using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging biomarkers. Int J Oncol 2007;30:651–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Wootton-Gorges, SL, Buonocore, MH, Kuppermann, N, et al. Cerebral proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in children with diabetic ketoacidosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:895–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Bizzi, A, Blasi, V, Falini, A, et al. Presurgical functional MR imaging of language and motor functions: validation with intraoperative electrocortical mapping. Radiology 2008;248:579–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrella, JR, Shah, LM, Harris, KM, et al. Preoperative functional MR imaging localization of language and motor areas: effect on therapeutic decision making in patients with potentially resectable brain tumors. Radiology 2006;240:793–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feigl, GC, Safavi-Abbasi, S, Gharabaghi, A, et al. Real-time 3T fMRI data of brain tumour patients for intra-operative localization of primary motor areas. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:708–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kesavadas, C, Thomas, B, Sujesh, S, et al. Real-time functional MR imaging (fMRI) for presurgical evaluation of paediatric epilepsy. Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:964–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobholz, JA, Rao, SM, Saykin, AJ, et al. Clinical use of functional magnetic resonance imaging: reflections on the new CPT codes. Neuropsychol Rev 2007;17:189–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, BC, Saykin, AJ, Williams, JM, et al. fMRI Wada test: prospects for presurgical mapping of language and memory. In Faro, SH, Mohamed, FB, eds. Functional MRI: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications. New York: Springer; 2006: 278–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, BC, Saykin, AJ. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgical planning for temporal lobe epilepsy: language, memory, and seizure outcome. In Hillary, FG, DeLuca, J, eds. Functional Neuroimaging in Clinical Populations. New York: Guilford Press; 2007: 185–218.Google Scholar
Devinsky, O, Perrine, K, Llinas, R, et al. Anterior temporal language areas in patients with early onset of temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1993;34:727–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaillard, WD, Berl, MM, Moore, EN, et al. Atypical language in lesional and nonlesional complex partial epilepsy. Neurology 2007;69:1761–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Springer, JA, Binder, JR, Hammeke, TA, et al. Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 1999;122:2033–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, B, Wellmer, J, Reuber, M, et al. Left hippocampal pathology is associated with atypical language lateralization in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain 2006;129:346–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woermann, FG, Jokeit, H, Luerding, R, et al. Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy. Neurology 2003;61:699–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bookheimer, S. Pre-surgical language mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychol Rev 2007;17:145–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frings, L, Wagner, K, Halsband, U, et al. Lateralization of hippocampal activation differs between left and right temporal lobe epilepsy patients and correlates with postsurgical verbal learning decrement. Epilepsy Res 2008;78:161–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janszky, J, Jokeit, H, Kontopoulou, K, et al. Functional MRI predicts memory performance after right mesiotemporal epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 2005;46:244–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, ML, Narayan, VM, Kimberg, DY, et al. Functional MRI predicts post-surgical memory following temporal lobectomy. Brain 2004;127:2286–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, MP, Strange, BA, Thompson, PJ, et al. Pre-operative verbal memory fMRI predicts post-operative memory decline after left temporal lobe resection. Brain 2004;127:2419–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, MP, Strange, BA, Duncan, JS, et al. Memory fMRI in left hippocampal sclerosis: optimizing the approach to predicting postsurgical memory. Neurology 2006;66:699–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllister, TW, Flashman, , McDonald, BC, et al. Mechanisms of working memory dysfunction after mild and moderate TBI: evidence from functional MRI and neurogenetics. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:1450–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryant, RA, Felmingham, K, Kemp, A, et al. Amygdala and ventral anterior cingulate activation predicts treatment response to cognitive behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychol Med 2008;38:555–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saykin, AJ, Wishart, HA, Rabin, , et al. Cholinergic enhancement of frontal lobe activity in mild cognitive impairment. Brain 2004;127:1574–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, RL, Detre, JA. Clinical neuroimaging using arterial spin-labeled perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Neurotherapeutics 2007;4:346–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez-Seara, MA, Wang, J, Wang, Z, et al. Imaging mesial temporal lobe activation during scene encoding: comparison of fMRI using BOLD and arterial spin labeling. Hum Brain Mapp 2007;28:1391–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakravarti, S, Srivastava, S, Mittnacht, AJC. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in children. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008;12:70–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoshi, Y. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: potential and limitations in neuroimaging studies. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005;66:237–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minagawa-Kawai, Y, Mori, K, Hebden, JC, et al. Optical imaging of infants' neurocognitive development: recent advances and perspectives. Dev Neurobiol 2008;68:712–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebden, JC, Austin, T. Optical tomography of the neonatal brain. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2926–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfberg, AJ, du Plessis, AJ. Near-infrared spectroscopy in the fetus and neonate. Clin Perinatol 2006;33:707–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heiss, W-D, Herholz, K. Brain receptor imaging. J Nucl Med 2006;47:302–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Forsberg, A, Engler, H, Almkvist, O, et al. PET imaging of amyloid deposition in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 2008;29:1456–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, CRLowe VJ, Jr, Senjem, ML, et al. 11C PiB and structural MRI provide complementary information in imaging of Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Brain 2008;131:665–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemppainen, NM, Aalto, S, Wilson, IA, et al. PET amyloid ligand [11C] PIB uptake is increased in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 2007;68:1603–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pike, KE, Savage, G, Villemagne, VL, et al. Beta-amyloid imaging and memory in non-demented individuals: evidence for preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2007;130:2837–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadir, A, Andreasen, N, Almkvist, O, et al. Effect of phenserine treatment on brain functional activity and amyloid in Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol 2008;63:621–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadir, A, Darreh-Shori, T, Almkvist, O, et al. PET imaging of the in vivo brain acetylcholinesterase activity and nicotine binding in galantamine-treated patients with AD. Neurobiol Aging 2008;29:1204–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mega, MS, Dinov, ID, Porter, V, et al. Metabolic patterns associated with the clinical response to galantamine therapy: a fludeoxyglucose f 18 positron emission tomographic study. Arch Neurol 2005;62:721–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potkin, SG, Anand, R, Fleming, K, et al. Brain metabolic and clinical effects of rivastigmine in Alzheimer's disease. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2001;4:223–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefanova, E, Wall, A, Almkvist, O, et al. Longitudinal PET evaluation of cerebral glucose metabolism in rivastigmine treated patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm 2006;113:205–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tune, L, Tiseo, PJ, Ieni, J, et al. Donepezil HCl (E2020) maintains functional brain activity in patients with Alzheimer disease: results of a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Geriatric Psychiatry 2003;11:169–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volkow, ND, Ding, YS, Fowler, JS, et al. Imaging brain cholinergic activity with positron emission tomography: its role in the evaluation of cholinergic treatments in Alzheimer's dementia. Biol Psychiatry 2001;49:211–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, H, Kato, M, Hayashi, M, et al. Memory and frontal lobe functions; possible relations with dopamine D2 receptors in the hippocampus. Neuroimage 2007;34:1643–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, MF, Smith, GS, Butters, M, et al. Effects of the dopaminergic agent and NMDA receptor antagonist amantadine on cognitive function, cerebral glucose metabolism and D2 receptor availability in chronic traumatic brain injury: a study using positron emission tomography (PET). Brain Inj 2005;19:471–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forssberg, H, Fernell, E, Waters, S, et al. Altered pattern of brain dopamine synthesis in male adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behav Brain Funct 2006;2:40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jucaite, A, Fernell, E, Halldin, C, et al. Reduced midbrain dopamine transporter binding in male adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: association between striatal dopamine markers and motor hyperactivity. Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:229–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, P, Howes, OD, Stone, J, et al. Functional neuroimaging in schizophrenia: diagnosis and drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2008;29:91–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, JS, Volkow, ND, Kassed, CA, et al. Imaging the addicted human brain. Sci Pract Perspect 2007;3:4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volkow, ND, Fowler, JS, Wang, G-J, et al. Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results of imaging studies and treatment implications. Arch Neurol 2007;64:1575–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werring, DJ, Clark, CA, Barker, GJ, et al. The structural and functional mechanisms of motor recovery: complementary use of diffusion tensor and functional magnetic resonance imaging in a traumatic injury of the internal capsule. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:863–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werring, DJ, Clark, CA, Parker, GJ, et al. A direct demonstration of both structure and function in the visual system: combining diffusion tensor imaging with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 1999;9:352–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hariri, AR, Weinberger, DR. Imaging genomics. Br Med Bull 2003;65:259–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viding, E, Williamson, , Hariri, AR. Developmental imaging genetics: challenges and promises for translational research. Dev Psychopathol 2006;18:877–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bookheimer, SY, Dapretto, M, Karmarkar, U. Functional MRI in children with epilepsy. Dev Neurosci 1999;21:191–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaillard, WD, Grandin, CB, Xu, B. Developmental aspects of pediatric fMRI: Considerations for image acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. Neuroimage 2001;13:239–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertz-Pannier, L, Chiron, C, Vera, P, et al. Functional imaging in the work-up of childhood epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst 2001;17:223–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slifer, KJ, Koontz, KL, Cataldo, MF. Operant-contingency-based preparation of children for functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Behav Anal 2002;35:191–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duhaime, A-C, Saykin, AJ, McDonald, BC, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the primary somatosensory cortex in piglets. J Neurosurg 2006;104:259–64.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×